Franz Baermann Steiner Exil Und Verwandlung

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Franz Baermann Steiner Exil Und Verwandlung Leseprobe Ulrich van Loyen Franz Baermann Steiner Exil und Verwandlung Zur Biografie eines deutschen Dichters und jüdischen Ethnologen AISTHESIS VERLAG Bielefeld 2011 Abbildung auf dem Umschlag: Franz Baermann Steiner, Selbstporträt, Bleistift auf Papier, ca. 1950. Der Abdruck sämtlicher Bilder in diesem Band erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Deutschen Literaturarchivs Marbach. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © Aisthesis Verlag Bielefeld 2011 Postfach 10 04 27, D-33504 Bielefeld Satz: Germano Wallmann, www.geisterwort.de Druck: docupoint GmbH, Magdeburg Alle Rechte vorbehalten ISBN 978-3-89528-788-6 www.aisthesis.de Inhaltsverzeichnis Ein Autor zwischen Verehrung und Vergessen. Einleitende Bemerkungen ............................................................................ 9 Die Neugier eines Meisterdenkers ................................................. 9 A Writer’s Writer .............................................................................. 12 Dichtung und Wahrheit .................................................................. 18 Die Erfindung eines Autors I. Prager Kreise (1909-1930) ............................................................ 25 I.1 Herkunft in Scherben ...................................................................... 25 I.2 Kindheit und Jugend in Prag .......................................................... 40 II. „Rief nicht die Stimme: Wo weilst du, wo weilst du?“ Poesie und Palästina (1928-1931) ............................................... 66 II.1 Von deutscher Universität ............................................................... 66 II.2 Frühe Gedichte und Umschwünge ............................................... 76 II.3 Palästina als Wendepunkt ................................................................ 85 II.4 Bei Hugo Bergmann ......................................................................... 93 II.5 Jerusalem schreiben .......................................................................... 113 III. Kreisen im Prager Orbit (1931-1936) ....................................... 123 III.1 Das „jüdische Grunderlebnis“ und seine Folgen ....................... 123 III.2 Von der Berufung des Dichters und der Unerreichbarkeit der Frauen ........................................................................................... 129 III.3 Geheime Reiche. Im Bann der Mystiker ...................................... 136 III.4 Profilsuche in der Prosa und im „Prager Kreis“ um Max Brod 160 III.5 Zionistischer Ausblick. Die Publikation in der Selbstwehr ..... 180 Die Zeit der Nordwanderung IV. „Dem Urgrund zunächst“. Ethnologische Lehrjahre (1935-1937) ....................................... 189 IV.1 Vormittags im Institut, nachmittags im ‚Gänsehäufel‘. Studienjahr in Wien ......................................................................... 189 IV.2 „Kleine vermerke am stürzenden pfad“ ........................................ 203 IV.3 Ein Argonaut in London ................................................................ 209 IV.4 Im Spiegel des Anderen. Erste ethnologische Arbeiten ............ 223 IV.5 Der Aborigine aus Grinzing. Erste Begegnungen mit Elias Canetti ............................................................................... 244 V. Passagen. Einbruch der Gegenwart (1938-1942) ................... 255 V.1 Staatenlos ............................................................................................ 255 V.2 Von Oxforder Anfängen, Hoffnungen und Missgeschicken ... 270 VI. „Vom kriege schweig, aber verschweig ihn nicht…“ Die Exilpoetik der Eroberungen in ihrem Kontext (1940-1945) ...................................................................................... 289 VI.1 Voraussetzungen. Exil und Exzentrizität ...................................... 289 VI.2 Hölderlinbilder – Zur Vorgeschichte ........................................... 295 VI.3 Zu Aufbau und Motivik der Eroberungen .................................. 303 VI.4 Der Einsame ....................................................................................... 313 VI.5 Zwischen Mythos und Wissenschaft, Romantik und Moderne: Zur Verortung der Eroberungen ........................ 320 VI.6 Steiners Poetik im Spiegel Rilkes ................................................... 330 VI.7 Identifikation mit dem Leiden der Welt: Der Brief an Georg Rapp ................................................................ 344 VI.8 „In Babylons Nischen“. London und seine Dichter .................. 352 VII. „Meine Heimatlosigkeit ist die Welt“. Entgrenzung und Exterritorialität in Wissenschaft und Prosa zwischen 1942 und 1949 ........................................... 376 VII.1. Opferstätten ....................................................................................... 376 VII.2 „Hilfloser als Tasmanier im Gewitter“. Die dämonische Zivilisation .......................................................... 389 VII.3. Wissen und Herrschen: Grundzüge der Thesis .......................... 408 Der Überlebende und der Tod VIII. Provinzen des Überlebens. Verwandtschaftssuche im Nachexil (1945-1949) ................... 423 VIII.1 Der lange Abschied .......................................................................... 423 VIII.2. „Wenn einer dies weiß/ Und stehend noch standhält im Sturze…“ H.G. Adler kehrt zurück .......................................... 432 VIII.3. „Seine eigenen Gedanken sind zwar besser, aber es gefallen ihm nur fremde.“ Canetti als Dritter im Bunde ........... 444 VIII.4. „To serve the god of all mankind“: Steiners Werben um Mahatma Gandhi ...................................................................... 461 VIII.5 Trost und Gedächtnis – Das „Gebet im Garten“ ....................... 483 VIII.6 Mentor und Mahner ........................................................................ 493 VIII.7 Robinson 1949 .................................................................................. 511 IX. Überlebender und „Überlebsel“ (1949-1952) ......................... 518 IX.1 Rettung durch, mit, in der Ethnologie ......................................... 518 IX.2 Für eine jüdische Ethnologie .......................................................... 537 IX.3 Marginalien. Zu Steiners Oxforder Prosa .................................... 549 IX.4. Orthodoxie und Tabu ...................................................................... 555 X. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Zeit (1951-1952) ............ 579 X.1 Kampf mit einem Engel. Die Beziehung zu Iris Murdoch ....... 579 X.2 „Überhaupt wandelte ich in Oviedo in meiner Jugend umher“. Serenaden einer spanischen Reise .................................. 592 X.3 Über dem Tod ................................................................................... 605 Bibliographie ..................................................................................................... 617 Abspann ............................................................................................................. 643 Personenregister ............................................................................................... 645 Ein Autor zwischen Verehrung und Vergessen. Einleitende Bemerkungen Für den Juden ist die Welt unbekannt. Das Prinzip des Gekannten ist das Gesetz: es ist offenbart. Der Talmud erforscht den Bereich des Bekanntgegebenen. Er ist das Kompendium aller möglichen Kreuz- und Quergänge im Gesetz. Darum das Nebeneinander widersprechender Auslegungen: nicht auf Entscheidungen kommt es an, sondern auf das Herumgehen im Gesetz, das Abschreiten und sich immer wie- der neu, und in immer wieder wechselnder Weise Zueigenmachen des Offenbarten. Von der Begrenztheit des Talmud zu sprechen ist Unsinn. Genauso begrenzt ist ein Afrikareisender durch die Küsten des Erdteils. Die Neugier eines Meisterdenkers Im Januar 1954 erhielt der Schriftsteller und Privatgelehrte H.G. Adler in Kensington folgenden Brief: Sehr geehrter Herr Doktor, der Anlass, unsere leider seit 1951 unterbrochene Korrespondenz wieder auf- zunehmen, ist Ihre Publikation aus dem Nachlass von Franz Baermann Steiner. Der Eindruck, den ich davon empfing, war ganz außerordentlich. Einmal um der Sache selbst willen, die eine Qualität hat, wie man sie ganz selten findet – es ist ein Symptom des Weltzustandes, daß man von einem solchen Mann, dem man sich wirklich bis ins Innerste verbunden fühlt, erst nach seinem Tode etwas erfährt; – dann aber noch aus einem mir wesentlichen Grunde: seine Kafka-Interpretation scheint mit meiner eigenen in einer fast bestürzenden Weise – im Gegensatz zu fast allem anderen, was je über Kafka geschrieben wurde, übereinzustimmen. Ich schicke Ihnen hier meine Arbeit über Kafka, die Anfang Dezember in der Neuen Rundschau erschien. Wenn Sie die Notiz „Kafka und das Alte Testament“ mit dem Anfang meiner Arbeit, vor allem aber die darauf folgenden „Ähnlichkeiten mit Dostojewskij“ mit dem Anfang des neunten Kapitels (und auch schon dem achten) meiner Sache vergleichen, so wird Ihr Erstaunen kaum geringer sein, als mein eige- nes es war. Meine Vorstellung von Kafkas antinomistischer Theologie trifft bis ins Innerste zusammen mit Steiners These, daß die Erlösung „weder von dieser Ordnung gewollt ist, noch sie will“, und die mythische Gottheit, von der ich rede, ist nichts anderes als der gnostische Demiurg, der bei
Recommended publications
  • Common Sayings and Expressions in Kafka Hartmut Binder
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 10:25 p.m. TTR Traduction, terminologie, re?daction Common Sayings and Expressions in Kafka Hartmut Binder Kafka pluriel : réécriture et traduction Volume 5, Number 2, 2e semestre 1992 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037123ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/037123ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Association canadienne de traductologie ISSN 0835-8443 (print) 1708-2188 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Binder, H. (1992). Common Sayings and Expressions in Kafka. TTR, 5(2), 41–105. https://doi.org/10.7202/037123ar Tous droits réservés © TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction — Les auteurs, This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit 1992 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Common Sayings and Expressions in Kafka Hartmut Binder Translation by Iris and Donald Bruce, University of Alberta "Bild, nur Büd"1 [Images, only images] Proverbial sayings are pictorially formed verbal phrases2 whose wording, as it has been handed down, is relatively fixed and whose meaning is different from the sum of its constituent parts. As compound expressions, they are to be distinguished from verbal metaphors; as syntactically dependant constructs, which gain ethical meaning and the status of objects only through their embedding in discursive relationships, they are to be differentiated from proverbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Language and Literature Peter Zusi
    chapter 17 Czech Language and Literature Peter Zusi Recent years have seen a certain tendency to refer to Kafka as a ‘Czech’ author – a curious designation for a writer whose literary works, without exception, are composed in German. As the preceding chapter describes, Kafka indeed lived most of his life in a city where Czech language and society gradually came to predominate over the German-speaking minor- ity, and Kafka – a native German-speaker – adapted deftly to this changing social landscape. Referring to Kafka as Czech, however, is inaccurate, explicable perhaps only as an attempt to counterbalance a contrasting simplification of his complicated biography: the marked tendency within Kafka scholarship to investigate his work exclusively in the context of German, Austrian or Prague-German literary history. The Czech socio-cultural impulses that surrounded Kafka in his native Prague have primarily figured in Kafka scholarship through sociological sketches portraying ethnic animosity, lack of communication and, at times, open violence between the two largest lin- guistic communities in the city. These historical realities have given rise to the persistent image of a ‘dividing wall’ between the Czech- and German- speaking inhabitants of Prague, with the two populations reading different newspapers, attending separate cultural institutions and congregating in segregated social venues. This image of mutual indifference or antagonism has often made the question of Kafka’s relation to Czech language and cul- ture appear peripheral. Yet confronting the perplexing blend of proximity and distance, famil- iarity and resentment which characterized inter-linguistic and inter- cultural contact in Kafka’s Prague is a necessary challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Fin-De-Siècle Vienna and the Larger Central Europe 1900: the Experience of Prague's Intellectuals
    Fin-de-siècle Vienna and the Larger Central Europe 1900: The Experience of Prague's Intellectuals Gary B. Cohen, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities The modernist breakthroughs in Viennese intellectual and artistic life around 1900 have attracted great interest over many decades. The remarkable concentration of innovative figures, the originality and significance of their work, the important personal connections among of them, and the apparent cultural fertility of the Viennese environment in that era have captured the attention of scholars and the educated public alike. Carl Schorske's masterful Fin-de-siecle Vienna, now some thirty-six years old, has introduced many readers to the intellectual and cultural world of Vienna and offered students a basic framework for understanding the foundations and patterns of some of the most important innovations. One must be careful, though, not to exaggerate the uniqueness of Vienna around 1900 or to see the city as the single most important cradle of twentieth-century modernism. We recognize that intellectuals and artists in Paris, Berlin, New York, Munich, Budapest, and other major European and North American cities were also breaking away from the nineteenth-century liberal rational synthesis in ways that had wide impact, engaging in their own secessions from established modes of thought and expression with the particular fields or disciplines involved and the exact timing of the revolts dependent on local circumstances. It is good to remember that for Schorske and others who have investigated particular cities in this or other eras of radical breakdown, examining intellectuals and artists in a single urban community has been a means to understand better the parallels and connections between activities in the various disciplines or genres and to identify the conditions, motivations, and impulses that were common to the 2 innovators in various fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Fruitman
    Creating Heart Stephen fruitman Creating a New Heart Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism Akademisk avhandling med tillstånd av rektorsämbetet vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen offentligen försvaras i Humanisthuset, hörsal E fredagen den 12 oktober 2001, klockan 09.15 av Stephen Fruitman <*3 V Stephen Fruitman: Creating a New Heart: Marcus Ehrenpreis on Jewry and Judaism English text Department of Historical Studies, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden Monograph 2001. 252 pages Idéhistoriska skrifter nr 35 ISBN: 91-7305-111-X ISSN: 0282-7646 Abstract This dissertation represents the first attempt to take account of the entire Swedish œuvre of Marcus Ehrenpreis and view it as a single, coherent statement, recognizing the very fundamental confrontation taking place between tradi­ tional and modern ways of viewing reality and its possible resolution. A reading of his work reveals that the one constant in his life in letters was the struggle to reconcile the apparent logical antithesis of universalism and particu­ larism, which this dissertation sees as one with resonance for all ethnic minorities. In the Chapter One, a general orientation in the modern Jewish world is provided, including the traditional worlds of Orthodoxy and Hasidism into which he was born; the trend toward the political emancipation of the Jews in Western and Central Europe and the subsequent waves of assimilation among young Jews; the exacerbation of antisemitic tendencies in both Eastern and Western Europe; the emergence of Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • A Father, What For? in Connection with the Show “Lettre Au
    Document generated on 09/26/2021 9:45 a.m. Sens public A Father, What for? In connection with the show “Lettre au père” of Jean-Yves Ruf, according to the text of Franz Kafka "Dearest Father" Gérard Wormser, Bernard Lahire and Christine Castelain-Meunier Repenser le numérique au 21ème siècle Article abstract 2014 Can the young man of today visualize the impossible dialogue of Kafka with his father? The evolution of the society has questioned the father's long time role URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1052427ar of supervision and authority. However, does that not open up a restructuring DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1052427ar of his figure? The depth of the father's influence is far-reaching. The English paediatrician and psychoanalyst Donald W. Winnicott said, “He can become a See table of contents maternal substitute for infants, providing child care from the ages of birth to two years as is maternity care”. Paternal love and everyday father/child relationship has a critical role in the development of early childhood. However, is this structuring enough? Does this not open up an era lacking references? Publisher(s) Today, what is the father's place at a time of contemporary changes in family Département des littératures de langue française life? ISSN 2104-3272 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this document Wormser, G., Lahire, B. & Castelain-Meunier, C. (2014). A Father, What for? In connection with the show “Lettre au père” of Jean-Yves Ruf, according to the text of Franz Kafka "Dearest Father". Sens public. https://doi.org/10.7202/1052427ar Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Grzegorz Gazda
    Grzegorz Gazda The Final Journey of Franz Kafka's Sisters Through me into the city full of woe; Through me the message of eternal pain; Through me the passage where the lost souls go. Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy 1 Magic Prague, esoteric Prague, Golden Prague. 2 The capital of the Czech Republic bears those names and nicknames not without reason. It is a truly extraordinary and fascinating city. A cultural palimpsest of texts written through the ages, texts that have been magnificently preserved until our times. "An old in folio of stone pages," as V. Nezval wrote. 3 A Slavic city with over a thousand years of history, but a city which at the same time, due to historical conditions, belongs rather to the culture of the West. The capital of the Czechs in which, however, an important part has always been played by foreign ethnic communities. But this arti- cle is no place to present historical panoramas and details. Our subject matter goes back to the turn of the 20 t h century, so let us stop at that. 1 Fragment of an inscription at the gates of hell which begins the third canto of the Divine Comedy (trans. C. Carson). This quote was used as a motto in the novel Kruta leta (1963, The Cruel Years ) by Frantisek Kafka, a Czech writer and literary scholar. 1 will speak more of him and his novel in this article. 2 Among numerous books dealing with the cultural and artistic history of this city, see, for example, K. Krejci, Praga. Legenda i rzeczywistość, Warszawa 1974, trans, from the Czech by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Prague's Public Space and Franz Kafka's Readings of Prague
    MAREK NEKULA The Divided City: Prague’s Public Space and Franz Kafka’s Readings of Prague It is no surprise that the monuments on Prague’s squares, riverbanks, and hills reflect the national ideologies from which they emanated. In the nineteenth century, when the first memorial monuments were founded, middle-class civic society used them to present and pass on its values to viewers in public space, viewers who themselves may have been nationally indifferent. In nineteenth-century Prague, these values were above all national in character: for the Czech and German mid- dle classes, language-based nationalism dominated all other values; it determined the political programs of most Czech and German political parties, as well as more private choices, such as where parents sent their children to schools. Czech middle-class nationalists demanded that the Czech language and Czech people be given equal standing with the Germans, while German middle-class nationalists wanted to maintain the status quo. Both groups were becoming more and more interested in creating linguistically distinct spaces that would be dominated by the language and symbols of Czech and German nationalism. In Prague, public space became the staging ground for national discourse, where adherents of monolingual national ideologies competed with one another and attempted to control public opinion in various ways, including the domina- tion of public space. One of the ways to control and speak to the public was to properly stage ceremonial acts, for example the funerals of Václav Hanka, Karel Havlíček Borovský and Božena Němcová or the laying of the first stone of the Czech National Theater.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Drawn from Life: Mary Douglas's Personal Method
    INTRODUCTION Drawn from life: Mary Douglas’s personal method Richard Fardon Mary Douglas (1921–2007) was the most widely read British anthropolo- gist of the second half of the twentieth century. Her writings continue to inspire researchers in numerous fields in the twenty-first century.1 This vol- ume of papers, first published over a period of almost fifty years, provides insights into the wellsprings of her style of thought and manner of writing. More popular counterparts to many of Douglas’s academic works – either the first formulation of an argument, or its more general statement – were often published around the same time as a specialist version. These first thoughts and popular re-imaginings are particularly revealing of the close relation between Douglas’s intellectual and personal concerns, a convergence that became more overt in her late career, when Mary Douglas occasionally wrote autobiographi- cally, explaining her ideas in relation to her upbringing, her family, and her experiences as both a committed Roman Catholic and a social anthropologist in the academy. The four social types of her theoretical writings – hierarchy, competition, the enclaved sect, and individuals in isolation – extend to remote times and distant places, prototypes that literally were close to home for her. This ability to expand and contract a restricted range of formal images allowed Mary Douglas to enter new fields of study with startling rapidity, to link unlikely domains of thought (through analogy, most frequently with religion), and to accommodate the most diverse examples in comparative frameworks. It was the way, to put it baldly, she made things fall into place.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Exile Literature and the Early Novels of Iris Mur- Doch
    University of Szeged Faculty of Arts Doctoral Dissertation The German Exile Literature and the Early Novels of Iris Mur- doch Dávid Sándor Szőke Supervisors: Dr. Zoltán Kelemen Dr. Anna Kérchy 2021 Acknowledgements I have a great number of people to thank for their support throughout this thesis, whether this support has been academic, financial, or spiritual. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr Zoltán Kelemen and Dr Anna Kérchy for their unending help, encouragement and faith in me during my research. Their knowledge about the Holocaust, 20th century English woman writers and minorities has given exceptional depth to my understanding of Murdoch, Steiner, Canetti and Adler. The eye-opening essays and lectures by Dr Peter Weber about the Romanian painter and Holocaust survivor Arnold Daghani’s time in England provided a genesis for this thesis. Had it not for him, I would not have thought about putting Murdoch’s thinking in the context of Cen- tral European refugee literature and culture during and after the Second World War. This thesis owes much to the 2017 Holocaust Conference in Szeged (19 October) and the 2019 International Holocaust Conference in Halle (14-16 November). I would like to express my gratitude to the March of the Living Hungary, the Holocaust Memorial Centre Budapest, the Memory Point of Hódmezővásárhely, the synagogues of Szeged and Hódmezővásárhely, Professor Werner Nell (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg), Professor Thomas Bremer (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg), Professor Sue Vice (University of Shef- field), and Dr Zoltán Kelemen for making these events possible. During my PhD, as part of the Erasmus ++ programme I spent an entire year at Martin- Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, where I made a great deal of research about the German coming to terms with the past.
    [Show full text]
  • World Hau Books
    WORLD Hau BOOKS Executive Editor Giovanni da Col Managing Editor Sean M. Dowdy Editorial Board Anne-Christine Taylor Carlos Fausto Danilyn Rutherford Ilana Gershon Jason Throop Joel Robbins Jonathan Parry Michael Lempert Stephan Palmié www.haubooks.com WORLD AN ANthrOPOLOgical EXAMINatION João de Pina-Cabral The Malinowski Monographs Series Hau Books Chicago © 2017 Hau Books and João de Pina-Cabral The Malinowski Monographs Series (Volume 1) The Malinowski Monographs showcase groundbreaking monographs that contribute to the emergence of new ethnographically-inspired theories. In tribute to the foundational, yet productively contentious, nature of the ethnographic imagination in anthropology, this series honors Bronislaw Malinowski, the coiner of the term “ethnographic theory.” The series publishes short monographs that develop and critique key concepts in ethnographic theory (e.g., money, magic, belief, imagination, world, humor, love, etc.), and standard anthropological monographs—based on original research—that emphasize the analytical move from ethnography to theory. Cover and layout design: Sheehan Moore Typesetting: Prepress Plus (www.prepressplus.in) ISBN: 978-1-912808-24-3 LCCN: 2016961546 Hau Books Chicago Distribution Center 11030 S. Langley Chicago, IL 60628 www.haubooks.com Hau Books is marketed and distributed by The University of Chicago Press. www.press.uchicago.edu Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Table of Contents Preface vii Acknowledgments xi chapter one World 1 chapter two Transcendence 31
    [Show full text]
  • From Martin Buber’S Iand Thou to Mikhail Bakhtin’Sconcept of ‘Polyphony’ 21
    Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept Studia Judaica Forschungen zur Wissenschaft des Judentums Begründet von Ernst Ludwig Ehrlich Herausgegeben von Günter Stemberger, Charlotte Fonrobert und Alexander Samely Band 83 Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception Edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr DE GRUYTER An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-037915-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-040222-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-040237-7 ISSN 0585-5306 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com TableofContents Paul Mendes-Flohr Introduction: Dialogue as aTrans-DisciplinaryConcept 1 Jürgen
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: After Society
    INTRODUCTION AFTER SOCIETY João Pina-Cabral and Glenn Bowman Introductory Remarks This book brings together a group of scholars who were shaped by Oxford anthropology in the late 1970s and early 1980s, each reflect- ing on their academic trajectories. This was a period of major political and academic change in Great Britain and, more generally, around the globe. A decade earlier, the student revolts had had a profound effect on the way the social sciences saw their role in society. Yet, it is only with the impact of the neoliberal reaction, at the time of Mrs Thatcher’s first government, that the full implications of the earlier crisis made themselves felt in anthropology. These implications were both internal, in theoretical terms, leading to a deep questioning of the central tenets that had shaped the social sciences throughout the twentieth century; and external, in academic terms, when scholarly discourse was suddenly treated by those in power as being largely irrelevant to the economy and to society – a kind of perverse luxury. Those of us who started our anthropological careers at the time faced the need to respond to a further set of aspects of intellectual decentring: (a) a second wave of psychoanalytic feminism was mak- ing important theoretical inroads; (b) poststructuralist critique was upturning the dominant individualist consensus that had dominated since the Second World War; (c) postmodernist dispositions were challenging traditional modes of ethnographic writing; and (d) a new Marxist-inspired postcolonial historiography was affecting the assumed perspectival roles of anthropological research, proposing radically new approaches to the very meaning of power.
    [Show full text]