DOCSLIB.ORG

Konifelenisi Hono Hivangofulu-Mā-Fitu ʻa E Siasi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Konifelenisi Hono Hivangofulu-Mā-Fitu ʻa E Siasi Huufi Konifelenisi 97 | 1 Konifelenisi hono Tohi Hivangofulu-mā-Fitu ʻa e MINITI Siasi Uesiliana Tauʻatāina ʻo Tonga KONIFELENISI KAKATO [-] Pulelulu, Siune 23 (7:30 efiafi) Huufi ʻo e Konifelenisi Tupou VI Tapu mo e ʻAfio ʻa e ʻOtua ko e Tamai, ʻAlo mo e Laumalie Maʻoniʻoni pea mo e potu toputapú ni. Tapu mo e ʻEiki Palesiteni ʻo e Siasi, Konifelenisi Kakato mo e Kainga kotoa ʻoku tau fakataha mai ki he Huufi ʻo e Konifelenisi hono 97 (hivangofulu- mā- fitu) ʻi he Falelotu Fakamanatu ʻo Kuini Lavinia, ʻi Angahā, ʻEua. Ko e Konifelenisi ko ení ʻoku ʻosi ai ʻa e fai fatongia ʻa e ʻEiki Palesiteni Mālōlō, Faifekau Dr. ʻAhio, pea ʻoku ne ʻomai ai ʻa e fekauʻaki ʻa e Vahefonua ʻEua pea mo Haʻa Ngata. ʻI he hala ʻa e Tuʻi Kanokupolu ko Ngata, ko e lahi taha ʻi hono Faleʻalo ko Vakalepo, ko hono hako eni ʻa ʻAhio. Naʻe nofo ʻEua pē ia, pea ʻomi e tala ke ne foki ange ke fakanofo Tuʻi, pea ne fakahā ange ke fili ha taha hono fototehina he kuo lata ia ʻi ʻEua. Ko ʻetau fakataha mai ko eni ki ʻEua, ʻosi e taʻu ʻe fāngofulu, ʻoku ou fakaʻamu pe ʻoku toe maama ange ʻo hā mahino mo ʻata lelei mai leva ʻa e ngaahi moʻoniʻi meʻa ʻi hotau Siasí mo e Fonua ʻoku fiemaʻu ke tau vakai ki ai, mo ha ngaahi founga ke tokoniʻi ai ʻe he Siasi ʻa e fonuá mo hono kakaí. Ko e kaveinga mahuʻinga ʻaupito kuo fokotuʻu ki he taʻu Faka-Konifelenisi ko eni: “Laumālie Māʻoniʻoni Fakafoʻou hotau Fāmilí” he ʻoku felāveʻi vāofi ia mo e ngaahi pole ʻoku fehangahangai mo e fonua ʻi he ʻaho ni. Ko e FĀMILÍ ko e ʻelito ia ʻo e faʻunga ʻo hotau sōsaietí, pea ʻoku lahi ʻa e ngaahi fili ʻoku tuʻu takai ke veteki hotau ngaahi fāmili ʻo holofa ai ʻetau nofo fakasōsaieti. Ko e fehuʻi leva ke fakatokangaʻi: Ko e hā ʻa e fatongia ʻo e Siasi ki he ngaahi fāmili, ke fakapapauʻi ʻoku nau malu mo taau, ke pukepuke ha sōsiaieti ʻoku mālohi mo melino? Ko e hā ʻa e tokoni ʻa e Siasí ki hono fakaivia ʻo e ngaahi fāmili, ke nau malava ʻo fehangahangai mo e ngaahi pole faka- sōsiale, ʻoku ne uesia ʻetau fanaú mo ʻetau nofo fakasōsaieti? ʻOku fiemaʻu lahi ʻe hotau fonua ʻa e tataki mo e fakaʻutoʻuta lelei ʻa e Siasí. ʻOku ou fakamālō atu ki he ngaahi ngāue lelei kuo fakahoko ʻe he Siasi ʻi he Potungāue Ako Faka- Kalisitiane, ʻi hono fokotuʻu ʻa e ngaahi polokalama ke tokoniʻi ʻa e toʻutupú mo e feinga ke longomoʻui ange ʻetau Lautohi Faka Sāpate. Ko e Vaʻa ki he Life-Line ʻoku ʻi ai ʻa e ngāue ki he faitoʻo kona tapu/moʻutāmakia, pea ʻi ai e fengāueʻaki mo e fānau ʻoku fakafoki mai ki ʻapi. Ko e Potungāue ʻEvangeliō, ʻi he ngāue fakaʻutumaukú, he ʻaʻahi ki he ngaahi fāmili, ʻo aʻu tonu e tokoni ki he ngaahi lotoʻi fāmili. Ko e Potungāue ʻa e Kakai Fefine, ʻoku ʻi ai ʻenau polokalama tauhi ki he kau faingataʻaʻia mo e aʻahi ki he kakai fefine ʻoku tauhi ʻi he ʻApi ko Huʻatolitoli. Pea ʻoku kei tuʻu mo tauhi ʻa e polokalama ʻaʻahi ʻa e Kau Faifekau ki he ngaahi falemahakí. ʻOku mātuʻaki mahuʻinga ke ongoʻi ʻe he fanga sipí ʻoku tokangaekina kinautolu pea ʻoku ʻiloʻi ʻe he Tauhí ʻene fanga sipí. ʻOku lelei ke fengāueʻaki ʻa e Siasi Uesiliana mo e ngaahi Siasi kehe, ke matamālohi hono kumi ha ngaahi founga ki hono fakafoʻou ʻo e ngaahi fāmili mo veteki ʻa e ngaahi pole faka-sōsialé. Ko e fakakaukau faka-ʻEkumenikale ʻeni, pea ʻoku kau ʻa e Siasi Uēsiliana Tauʻatāina ʻo Tonga ki he Kōsilio Fakatahataha ʻa e Ngaahi Siasi ʻo Māmaní. ʻOku ʻi ai e taimi ʻoku fiemaʻu ke tau kumi ha ngaahi founga ʻoku toe mālohi ange, ke tokoni mai ʻi he ngaahi taimi faingataʻá. ʻOku hoko ʻa e Laumālie Māʻoniʻoni, Fakafoʻou Hotau Fāmilí 2 | Tohi Miniti faingataʻa fakamāmani lahi ko e Covid taha hiva (19), ke ne uki kotoa e ngaahi Siasí ke lotua ʻa e faingataʻá ni, ʻo ʻikai ke toe lau Siasi, koeʻuhi ko ʻene mafatukituki ʻo e faingataʻá. ʻOku pehē tofu pē ʻa e lahi ʻo e ngaahi faingataʻa faka-sōsiale ʻi Tonga, ʻi he taimí ni. Ko ia ai, kuo pau ke tau ngāue fakataha pea tau kumi ha ngaahi founga, ke fakaivia e fatongia ʻo e Siasí, ki hono tokoniʻi hotau kakai, ʻi heʻetau lotú mo ngāue foki. Ko e anga tukufakaholo ʻo e Siasi Uesiliana ʻa e Ngāue. Ka ko e fakamoʻuí, hangē tofu pē ko e ʻofá, ʻe toki malava pē ke tafe atu ʻo aʻu ki ha taha ʻo kapau ʻe ngāueʻi. Ko e Siasí, ko e sino malohi ke ne fai ha liliu. ʻOku fiemaʻu ke tau mohu founga ange, ke ope atu ʻa e tokoni ʻa e Siasí ki he fonuá, ʻo ʻikai ngata pe ʻi he lau ʻo e folofolá, kae hulu atu ʻa hono ngāueʻi ʻa e ngaahi meʻa ʻoku fakahā mai ʻe he folofola, ke lava ke tokoniʻiʻaki hotau kakaí, hotau fonuá, hotau Siasí mo hotau ngaahi fāmili foki. ʻOku ou talamonū atu ki he Konifelenisi hono Hivangofulu- mā -fitu, he ko hono ola ʻetau ngāueʻi e kaveinga ʻa e Konifelenisi, ʻoku fakahā mai pē ʻe ʻAisea 61: veesi 9, “ʻE ʻiloa honau hakó ʻi he ngaahi puleʻangá, mo honau pikilaú ʻi he lotolotonga ʻo e ngaahi kakaí: ko kinautolu kotoa ʻoku sio kiate kinautolu te nau fakamoʻoni, ko e hako kinautolu ʻoku fai tāpuekina meia Sihova.” ʻOku ou ʻofa atu kia kimoutolu kotoa. Tali ki he Tō Folofola Lord Tangi-ʻo-Vaonukonuka Fakatapu ki he ʻAfio ʻa e ʻOtua Mafimafi ʻi he Potu Toputapú ni. ʻOku ou hapai atu ʻa e fakaʻapaʻapa mo e fakatapu ki he ʻAfio ʻa e Tuʻi ʻo Tonga, Tupou VI. Tapu ki hoʻo ʻAfio Kuini Nanasipauʻu, ko e Kuini ki he Taloní. Tapu kia Pilinisesi Salote Mafileʻo Pilolevu Tuita mo e Fale ʻo Haʻa Moheofo. Tapu ki he Palesiteni ʻo e Siasí, pea ʻoku ou kole ke u hūfanga ʻi he fakatapu kakato kuo tatakiʻaki ʻa e Kātoanga Mamalú ni, kae fakamonū ʻa e koloa kuo u lave ai. ʻOku ou maʻu ʻa e fiefia mo e loto māfana moʻoni ke fakafofongaʻi atu ʻa e Palesiteni ʻo e Siasí, ʻa e Taʻahine Kuiní, kae ʻumaʻa ʻa e Konifelenisi Kakato hono Hivangofulu-mā-Fitu. Fakamālō loto fiefia mo loto māfana ki hoʻo ʻAfió, hiki homau leʻó ʻo fakafetaʻi mo fakamālo ki he ʻOtua Mafimafí ʻi he fakalākoifie ʻa e ʻAfioná, Tupou VI ko e Tuʻi, ʻi hoʻo hāʻelea mai ʻo huufi ʻa e Konifelenisi ko hono hivangofulu mā fitu, mo fakanofo ʻa e ʻEiki Palesiteni kae ʻumaʻa ʻa e tō ʻa e koloa mahuʻinga ke fononga mo e Siasí ʻi he taʻu faka-Konifelenisi ko ʻení. Ko e taʻu ʻaki eni ʻe hongofulu ʻa hoʻo ʻAfio ʻi he fatongia faka-ʻOtua ko hono taki ʻa e Fonuá, toutou hāʻelea ʻo tuku mai ʻa e fekau mahuʻinga ki he fononga ʻa e konifelenisí ʻi he taʻu taki taha - hangē ko e Moʻui leleí, mo e Akó. ʻOku aʻu mai ki he Konfelenisi hono Hivangofulu- mā- fitu, kuo tō mai ʻa e koloa pea ʻoku kakato ki he Konifelenisí kaeʻumaʻā e Palesitení pea mo e Sekelitali Lahi kuo fakanofó, ʻa e fatongia ʻo e Siasí ki he Fāmilí. Kuo kakato ʻaupito pea ʻoku hangē ʻoku kiʻi fiefia ʻa e Siasí ʻi hoʻo Folofola ke fakaʻilongaʻi ha kiʻi ngāue kuo lava. ʻOku mau kole fakamolemole atu ki hoʻo ʻAfio ʻa e ʻikai ke mau fuʻu mohu founga ki he fatongia ko ʻeni ke fakalakalaka pea mo e kuongá. Ka ʻoku māfana homau lotó, ʻi hoʻo folofola faka-Tamai ki he Konifelenisi ko ʻeni ki he fatongia ʻoku mau hanga ki ai. ʻOku tokanga maʻu pē ʻa e Konifelenisí pea mo e Siasí ki ha folofola ʻoku tō mai mei hoʻo ʻAfió pea ʻoku ou fakafofongaʻi atu ʻa e fiefia pea mo e fakamālō pea mo ʻemau tukupā te mau vakai ki ha founga ke fakalelei mo fakakakatoʻaki ʻa e folofola ko e koloa kuo tō ʻi he Konifelenisi ko ʻení. ʻOku fiefia ʻa e Konifelenisi he naʻe ʻi ai e Taha ʻo e Houʻeiki ʻo e Fonua, ʻa e ʻulu ʻo Haʻa Ngatá, naʻá ne hoko ko e Palesiteni, ʻo Taki ʻa e Siasí - mei he Fāmili. Laumālie Māʻoniʻoni, Fakafoʻou Hotau Fāmilí Huufi Konifelenisi 97 | 3 ʻOku koloaʻia ʻa e Siasí pea naʻe pehē pē ʻa e tuʻuta mai ʻa e kau misinalé naʻe tali ʻe he ʻEne ʻAfió pea tali ʻe he Houʻeikí pea mo e kakai ʻo e fonuá. ʻOku kei tauhi ʻe he Siasi Uesiliana Tauʻatāina ʻo Tonga ʻa e mahuʻinga ko eni, mo e fatongia ko ení. Tulou atu, ʻoku ʻi ai ʻeku kiʻi talanoa. Mei he Fāmili. Naʻe ʻi ai ʻa e kiʻi talavou naʻe hū mai ki he Kolisi ko Tupou ʻi Nukuʻalofa mei ʻUtui, Vavaʻu, ako ʻia Toketā Molitoni. Naʻá ne hoko ko e Matematika ʻo ʻene kau akó, pea naʻa ne hoko ko e Faifekau. Naʻa ne hoko ko e faiako ʻi he Kolisí, pea naʻa ne hoko ko e Tiuta lahi ʻi he Kolisi ko Tupou ʻi Nukuʻalofa mahalo ko e 1905 nai. Naʻa ne hiki ʻa e Kolisi ko Tupou mei Nukuʻalofa ki Nāfualu ʻi he 1921, pea kei Tiuta Lahi aipē ʻa e tangataʻeikí ni ʻi he Kolisi ko Tupoú, ʻo aʻu mai ki he 1941. Ko e Tiuta Lahi fuoloa taha ia ʻi he hisitōlia ʻo e Kolisi ko Tupoú.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Maori Authorities
    TEENA BROWN PULU Minerals and Cucumbers in the Sea: International relations will transform the Tongan state Abstract Constitution law researcher Guy Powles, a Pakeha New Zealander residing in Australia was not optimistic accurate predictions on “the [Tonga] election which is coming up now in November” could be made (Garrett, 2014). “A man would be a fool to try to guess just where the balance will finish up,” he uttered to Jemima Garrett interviewing him for Radio Australia on April 30th 2014 (Garrett, 2014). Picturing the general election seven months away on November 27th 2014, Powles thought devolving the monarch’s executive powers to government by constitutional reform was Tonga’s priority. Whether it would end up an election issue deciding which way the public voted was a different story, and one he was not willing to take a punt on. While Tongans and non-Tongan observers focused attention on guessing who would get into parliament and have a chance at forming a government after votes had been casted in the November election, the trying political conditions the state functioned, floundered, and fell in, were overlooked. It was as if the Tongans and Palangi (white, European) commentators naively thought changing government would alter the internationally dictated circumstances a small island developing state was forced to work under. Teena Brown Pulu has a PhD in anthropology from the University of Waikato. She is a senior lecturer in Pacific development at AUT University. Her first book was published in 2011, Shoot the Messenger: The report on the Nuku’alofa reconstruction project and why the Government of Tonga dumped it.
    [Show full text]
  • Pe Structure Cf Tongan Dance a Dissertation
    (UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII LIBRARY P E STRUCTURE CF TONGAN DANCE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION CF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FUIFILDffiNT CF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE CF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ANTHROPOLOGY JUNE 1967 By _\G Adrienne L? Kaeppler Dissertation Committee: Alan Howard, Chairman Thomas W. Maretzki Roland W. Force Harold E. McCarthy Barbara B. Smith PREFACE One of the most conspicious features of Polynesian life and one that has continually drawn comments from explorers, missionaries, travelers, and anthropologists is the dance. These comments have ranged from outright condemnation, to enthusiastic appreciation. Seldom, however, has there been any attempt to understand or interpret dance in the total social context of the culture. Nor has there been any attempt to see dance as the people themselves see it or to delineate the structure of dance itself. Yet dance has the same features as any artifact and can thus be analyzed with regard both to its form and function. Anthropologists are cognizant of the fact that dance serves social functions, for example, Waterman (1962, p. 50) tells us that the role of the dance is the "revalidation and reaffirmation of the aesthetic, religious, and social values shared by a human society . the dance serves as a force for social cohesion and as a means to achieve the cultural continuity without which no human community can persist.” However, this has yet to be scientifically demonstrated for any Pacific Island society. In most general ethnographies dance has been passed off with remarks such as "various movements of the hands were used," or "they performed war dances." In short, systematic study or even satisfactory description of dance in the Pacific has been virtually neglected despite the significance of dance in the social relations of most island cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tongan Pentecost of 1834 : a Revival in the Kingdom of Tonga
    ABSTRACT The Tongan Pentecost of 1834: A Revival in the Kingdom of Tonga: A Possible Key for Renewal and Unity for the Tongan Church Today by Manase Koloamatangi Tafea The Tongan Pentecost was a revival that took place in the kingdom of Tonga ' when Aisea Vovole Latu preached in the village of 'Utui in 1 834. During the service the Holy Spirit moved in a mighty way empowering the congregation until prayers, singing, and testimonies began in such a way that the preacher could not control them. The fire of the Holy Spirit which started in 'Utui spread within a month to all the islands in the Tonga group. The king and the people were converted, resulting in unity and a new motivation for mission and evangelism. After a year the momentum of this Tongan Pentecost spread to the other Pacific islands, first to the Fijian and Samoan groups. Although the Tongan people today tend to remember the history of the 1 834 Tongan Pentecost, their experience of the Holy Spirit is, by and large, limited and perfunctory resulting in division and lack of purpose. Therefore, the purpose of this project dissertation is to rediscover how the Tongan Pentecost of 1 834 affected the Tongan worldview, establishing a sense of unity and mission, and to see if a fresh encounter with the Holy Spirit can renew that sense of unity and mission today. In this project I examined the history of the 1834 experience. With a questionnaire I discovered: (1) that the experience actually happened; (2) that the experience created unity and purpose; and, (3) that the experience could be renewed so the Tongan church can be reunited and motivated toward mission and evangelism.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    TEENA BROWN PULU “Ma’afu’s Word is in the Hills” What is a Noble’s Role in a Democratised Tonga? Foreword Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time. Winston Churchill The Kingdom of Tonga’s nobility, a land owning class of thirty three title holders and estates – all men – have been the subject of scrutiny and criticism in the political reform of this small island developing state from an absolute monarchy to a democratised state and society. A range of viewpoints have emerged since the November 2010 general election signalling the advent of a new parliamentary arrangement. This afforded greater representation of seventeen people’s representatives elected from registered voters on the general role to that of the nobility, nine nobles elected to the House from their class group of landed gentry. Opinions are put forward by ordinary citizens. The nobility, by comparison, have been reluctant to respond as a collective. However, individual nobles have reacted against arguments that their election to parliament is altered (Radio New Zealand 2012a). An idea which has surfaced is that the nobles should not be elected by their class group, but made to stand for election on the general roll and compete with Dr. Teena Brown Pulu is a lecturer at AUT University “Ma’afu’s Word is in the Hills” 139 What is a Noble’s Role in a Democratised Tonga? ordinary citizen candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Commons at The
    http://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Kakai Tonga ‘i ‘Okalani Nu’u Sila Tongan Generations in Auckland New Zealand Teena Joanne Brown Pulu A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology at the University of Waikato 2007 Hamilton, New Zealand ii Abstract This thesis is written in the format of a three act play. The author has elected this structure to frame the ethnographic data and analysis because it seemed befitting for telling my own life story alongside the memories of three generations of my matrilateral and patrilateral Tongan family residing in Auckland New Zealand. Thus, actors and scenes play out the thesis storyline in three parts where each act is titled Prologue, Dialogue and Epilogue. The Prologue, part one of this three act play, is three chapters which sets in motion the main actors – the research participants, and the scenes – the ethnographic context in which data was collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ko E Tohi Miniti 'O E Konifelenisi Kakato Hono Hivangofulu 'A E Siasi Uēsiliana Tau'atāina 'O Tonga
    Ko e Tohi Miniti ‘o e Konifelenisi Kakato hono Hivangofulu ‘‘aa ee SSiiaassii UUēēssiilliiaannaa TTaauu‘‘aattāāiinnaa ‘‘oo TToonnggaa ‘Ilo pea tui mo mo’ui’aki ‘a e Folofola ‘a e ‘Otua ‘i he Tohitapu Palesiteni ‘o e Siasi – Rev. Dr. ‘Ahio Sekellitali Lahi – Rev. Dr. Tevita K. Havea Falelotu Fakamanatu Senituli Tūsite 25 Siune – Tūsite 02 Siulai Nuku‘alofa, Tongatapu 2013 ii | Tohi Miniti Hokohoko Peesi Taliui mo e Pāloti ki he Palesiteni mo e Sekelitali 1 Huufi ‘o e Konifelenisi 2 Fehuʻi 1(i): Ko hai ʻa e kau Mēmipa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 7 Kau Fakafofonga Pāloti 7 ‘I Honau Lakanga 7 Ngaahi Vahefonua 8 Ngaahi Potungāue Faka-Konifelenisi 10 Kau Fakafofonga Kaumeʻa 13 Fehuʻi 1(ii): Ko hai kuo fili ke kau ki he Kōmiti Siʻi Fakaikiiki ʻa e Konifelenisi? 21 Fehuʻi 1(iii): Pe kuo pekia ha Faifekau ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 31 Fehuʻi 1(iv): Pe kuo pekia ha Fakafofonga ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 31 Fehuʻi 1(v): Pe kuo pekia ha Setuata FakaKonifelenisi ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 31 Fehuʻi 1(vi): Pe kuo pekia ha Faiako Siasi ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 32 Fehuʻi (2): Pe ʻoku ʻi ai ha kole mei ha Vāhenga ke maʻu ha Faifekau? 32 Fehuʻi (3): Pe ʻoku tau pehē ke vahevahe pe liliu ha Vahe pe ha Vāhenga Ngāue? 32 Fehuʻi (4): Pe ʻoku tau pehē ke kamata ha Vāhenga Ngāue foʻou? 32 Fehuʻi (5): ʻOku fēfē ʻetau Tohi Kakai? 32 Fehuʻi (6): Ko e hā ʻa e Fakamatala ki he Ngaahi Potungāue ‘a e Konifelenisi? 32 Fehuʻi (7): Ko e hā ʻa e Fakamatala ki he Potungāue Ako mo e ngaahi Akoʻanga? 32 Fehuʻi (8): Ko e hā haʻatau tuʻutuʻuni ki he ngāue ki Muli?
    [Show full text]
  • Ko E Miniti ‘O E Konifelenisi Kakato Hono Hivangofulu-Ma-Taha
    Ko e Miniti ‘o e Konifelenisi Kakato hono Hivangofulu-ma-taha ‘‘aa ee SSiiaassii UUēēssiilliiaannaa TTaauu‘‘aattāāiinnaa ‘‘oo TToonnggaa Laumālie Mā‘oni‘oni, Fakafo‘ou hotau Siasi Palesiteni ‘o e Siasi – Rev. Dr. ‘Ahio Sekelitali Lahi – Rev. Dr. Tevita K. Havea Falelotu Laumālie Mā’oni’oni Tūsite 24 Siune – Monite 30 Siune Neiafu, Vava’u 2014 ii | Tohi Miniti Hokohoko Peesi Taliui & Pāloti ki he Palesiteni mo e Sekelitali 1 Ko e Huufi ‘o e Konifelenisi 2 Tō Folofola Huufi ‘o e Konifelenisi 3 Tali ‘o e Tō Folofola 3 Fakamatala Fakata’u ‘a e Palesiteni 4 Fehuʻi 1(i): Ko hai ʻa e kau Mēmipa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 9 Kau Fakafofonga Pāloti 9 ‘I Honau Lakanga 9 Ngaahi Vahefonua 10 Ngaahi Potungāue Faka-Konifelenisi 12 Kau Fakafofonga Kaumeʻa 14 Fehu’i 1(ii): Ko hai kuo fili ke kau ki he Kōmiti Si’i Fakaikiiki ‘a e Konifelenisi? 23 Fehuʻi 1(iii): Pe kuo pekia ha Faifekau ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 34 Fehuʻi 1(iv): Pe kuo pekia ha Fakafofonga ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 34 Fehuʻi 1(vi): Pe kuo pekia ha Setuata Faka-Konifelenisi ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 34 Fehuʻi 1(vi): Pe kuo pekia ha Faiako Siasi ʻi he vahaʻa ʻo e Konifelenisi? 34 Fehuʻi (2): Pe ʻoku ʻi ai ha kole mei ha Vāhenga ke maʻu ha Faifekau? 34 Fehuʻi (3): Pe ʻoku tau pehē ke vahevahe pe liliu ha Vahe pe ha Vāhenga Ngāue? 34 Fehuʻi (4): Pe ʻoku tau pehē ke kamata ha Vāhenga Ngāue foʻou? 35 Fehuʻi (5): ʻOku fēfē ʻetau Tohi Kakai? 35 Fehuʻi (6): Ko e hā ʻa e Fakamatala ki he: 35 Fehuʻi (7): Ko e hā ʻa e Fakamatala ki he Potungāue Ako mo e ngaahi Akoʻanga? 36 Fehuʻi (8): Ko
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of Groundwater in Tongatapu, Kingdom of Tonga Groundwater Evaluation and Monitoring Assessment
    SOPAC/EU EDF 8 Reducing the Vulnerability of Pacific APC States Vulnerability of Groundwater in Tongatapu, Kingdom of Tonga Groundwater Evaluation and Monitoring Assessment Ian White, Tony Falkland and Tevita Fatai Australian National University Canberra, Australia June 2009 Tongatapu Groundwater Vulnerability, June 2009 page i Table of Contents Table of Contents i List of Tables viii List of Figures xi List of Annexes xviii List of Abbreviations and Units xviii Summary 1 Introduction 1 Work carried out 1 Principle findings 2 Recommendations 6 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Vulnerability of Small Island States 12 1.2 SOPAC/EDF8 Study of Groundwater in Tongatapu 12 1.3 Vulnerability of groundwater in Tongatapu 16 1.4 Goal of this project 18 1.5 Project objectives 18 2 Outline of the Project 19 2.1 Terms of Reference 19 2.2 Activities 19 2.3 Project team members 19 2.4 Objectives 19 2.5 Project Work Plan 19 2.6 Project outputs 20 3 Water Monitoring, Institutional Issues and Demographics 21 3.1 Key monitoring data 21 3.1.1 Rainfall, evaporation and SOI 21 3.1.2 Groundwater data 21 3.1.3 Pumping, consumption and leakage 21 3.1.4 Groundwater data checking, analysis and reporting 22 3.2 Relevant agencies 22 3.3 Management and monitoring activities and responsibilities 22 3.3.1 Geology Section, MLSNRE 22 3.3.2 Public Health Section of the Environmental Health Division, MoH 23 3.3.3 Tonga Water Board, TWB 23 3.3.4 Tonga Meteorological Service, TMS 23 3.3.5 Ministry of Agricultural, Food, Forestry and Fisheries, MAFFF 24 3.3.6 Waste Authority, WA 25 3.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Village Day in Diaspora
    TEENA BROWN PULU Village day in diaspora Photograph Credit: Teena Brown Pulu On New Zealand Labour Day, October 26th 2015, affiliates of a rural farming village in Tonga residing in Auckland held a feast for Kolonga Day. It was convened at the Otahuhu Library, Pool, and Leisure Centre with over one thousand people in attendance. The centre is an Auckland Council hub for the diverse communities of Otahuhu to use. Why celebrate a Tongan village in New Zealand? Commemorating communities in Tonga by hosting village days overseas is an invented cultural practice in diaspora. In developed countries where Tongans have migrated to – New Zealand, Australia, and the United States – village days have taken off as the instigator of sub-nationalism. Sub-nationalism is a social phenomenon transpiring at the community level. It is distinguishable from Tongan nationalism, a weightier and widespread model of patriotism, which applauds the South Pacific Kingdom as the cornerstone Teena Brown Pulu is a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Maori and Indigenous Development at Auckland University of Technology. Village day in diaspora 29 of its motto, God and Tonga are my inheritance. Contrastingly, sub-nationalism evokes the individuality and unique characteristics that a village is remembered for. Rampant Tongan nationalism is reproduced by manoeuvring history from above and below. The current monarch, King Tupou VI, appeals to loyalists and royalists, while the country’s rugby team, ‘Ikale Tahi, charms all classes of citizens and expatriates. Therefore, it seems remarkable that amidst the pomp of Tongan patriotism, overseas settlements have diverged to put village loyalties on parade.
    [Show full text]
  • (De)Constructing Tongan Creativity: a Talanoa About Walking in Two Worlds
    (De)constructing Tongan Creativity: a Talanoa about Walking in Two Worlds A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Janet Fatafehi Lupe ‘O Talau Tupou School of Communication Studies Auckland University of Technology, 2018 Abstract The growing number of Tongan creators searching for a place of belonging and acceptance between the two worlds Tonga and Aotearoa New Zealand has contributed to cultural spaces shifting in terms of identity negotiation, effects on expressions of traditional and contemporary and Tongan values in creative work and confusion around the notion of ‘creativity’. This study deconstructs the concept of creativity, in the walk between two worlds. Being a creative in New Zealand equals being innovative, invoking “the shock of the new” (O’Connor, 2010, p. 15). However, being creative in Tonga equals honouring tradition in one’s work, the ideals of “interdependence, collectivity, cooperation and authoritarianism” (Weiner, 2000, p. 18). In this study the method of gathering data was carried out by conducting in-depth talanoa (cross- cultural process of storytelling derived from Pacific islands traditions) with Tongan artists and spokespersons investigating their lived experiences and cultural identity. To further enhance each voice and richness of the talanoa, thematic analysis assisted in n elucidating meaningful insights. From the intercultural communication literature, key cultural values of each ‘world’ can be identified. The key values of western societies are often said to relate to individual rights and freedoms; justice in terms of equity and equal access; intellectual property, promotion of competition and consumerism; and, scientific-rational thinking (Kornelly, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Fakaongo and Tau'ataina :|B the Influences of the Tongan Traditional
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. FAKAONGO AND TAU’ATAINA: The Influences of the Tongan Traditional Religion, the European Civilization and Wesleyan Teachings on the formation of Tongan religious identities. Paula Onoafe Latu Student ID. 10186501 A Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at Massey University, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND 2011. Map of the Kingdom of Tonga Page0of193 Source: GIS, Ministry of Lands, Survey and Natural Resources, Kingdom of Tonga. Page1of193 Dedication To the memory of His Majesty King Tupou I, Shirley Waldemar Baker, Jabez Bunting Watkin, Sione Latu II and the kau Tau’ataina; and Her Royal Highness Princess Salote Pilolevu, James Egan Moulton, John Havea, Sione Latu I and the kau Fakaongo, whose loyalties, sufferings, and faithful commitments inspired this thesis writing. Page2of193 Acknowledgement This study, on the influence of the Tongan traditional religion, the European civilization and Wesleyan doctrine on the formation of the Tongan religious identity: Fakaongo and Tau’ataina, was conducted through the College of Humanities and Social Sciences of Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand. The completion of this work was made possible with the support of many, whom I would like to acknowledge. First, I extend a very sincere thanks to my supervisor, Professor Peter Lineham for his advice, guidance and assistance in the shaping of this thesis. I thank Miss Lavinia Ongo ‘Olive ‘e Ua Manoa and Mrs Jeniffer Ma’u for proof reading of the drafts of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The State and the Church, the State of the Church in Tonga Heneli T
    The State and the Church, the State of the Church in Tonga Heneli T. Niumeitolu Ph.D. Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2007 I hereby declare that this thesis constitutes my own research and writing, and it has not been submitted in any previous application for a degree. All quotations have been distinguished and the source information acknowledged. Heneli Taliai Niumeitolu February 2007 i Dedication This thesis is dedicated with deep gratitude to my parents Rev. Dr. Siaosi and Sauliloa Afa Niumeitolu who taught me about loving and living for others. ii Abstract This dissertation examines the impact of ‘Tongan culture’ as represented by those with power in the Free Wesleyan Church of Tonga (FWC). The word “free” in the name of a church usually denotes the desire to be independent of the State or any other outside control but in this context it was often the contrary. From the outset of the Wesleyan Mission in 1826, the chiefs who embodied and controlled Tonga, welcomed the early European explorers yet with the twin underlying aims of gaining benefits while simultaneously maintaining their supremacy. The dissertation argues that the outcome leaves the FWC in dire need of inculturation, with Gospel challenging ‘Culture.’ Historical and anthropological approaches are used to substantiate this claim. Encouraged by Captain Cook’s report the missionaries arrived and were welcomed by the chiefs. The conversion of the powerful Taufa‘ahau was pivotal to the spread of the Wesleyan Mission yet this marriage of convenience came at a cost because Taufa‘ahau had his own agenda of what a church should be.
    [Show full text]