DOCSLIB.ORG

Salmon Sans Borders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salmon Sans Borders Scandinavia TRADITIONAL FISHING Salmon Sans Borders Fishing for salmon along the Deatnu or Tana river has long been fundamental to the culture of the indigenous Sámi people along the Finland-Norway border ishing for salmon (Salmo Danish-Norwegian jurisdiction. This salar) along the over 200-km had consequences for the territorial Fwatercourse on the border of division of the Tana river valley too. Finland and Norway, called Deatnu From then until the present border (in the Sámi language) or Tana (in was drawn in 1751, Denmark-Norway Norwegian), has been going on for at had exclusive jurisdiction over the least 7,000 to 8,000 years, or for as long lowest 30-40 km of the river. Juridical as human existence after the last Ice and clerical jurisdiction over the rest Age. The Tana river valley is situated in of the valley belonged to the Swedish an area in which the Sámi are the oldest realm. But the Sámi still had to pay known ethnic group. Sámi culture, as taxes to Denmark-Norway. it exists in northern Scandinavia and Until 1809, Finland belonged to 4 the northwestern parts of Russia, is at Sweden. Then it became a Grand Duchy least 2,000 to 3,000 years old. Salmon under the Russian Tsar. The border fishing remains a fundamental part along the Tana watercourse became the of Sámi culture on both sides of the border between Finland and Norway. Finland-Norway border. Neither this change, nor the separation The first written sources from this of Norway from Denmark in 1814 river district date to the end of the 16th and its union with Sweden, had any century. They show that none of the obvious impacts on the salmon fishing surrounding States had gained sole carried out by the predominant Sámi population of the Tana river valley. Through an additional paragraph ttoo the border treaty of 1751 ‘1ste Codicil ...the Sámi–from mid-Scandinavia and northwards—were oog tillägg’ (The first Codicil with accorded the right to continue to use the land and waters AAdditional paragraphs), later called on both sides of the new border. ttheh Lapp Codicil, the Sámi—from mid- SScandinavia and northwards—were aaccorded the right to continue to use ththe land and waters on both sides of the susupremacypremacy of tthehe TTanaana ririverver vavalleylley oorr nnew border. the Sámi who lived there. Fishing and The States that drew up this hunting, especially of wild reindeer, extensive document of rights, consisting were important. By the start of the 17th of 30 paragraphs, acknowledged the century, the Sámi had established an Sámi as a people of their own with ownership-like grip over the salmon fundamental rights and a right to a This article, by Steinar Pedersen fishery. future. They, therefore, agreed to ([email protected]), Soon after 1595, Russia stopped create rules to secure the future of ‘den Principal at the Sámi University College, demanding taxes from the Sámi in Lappiske Nation’ (the Sámi nation), Norway, builds on the following of his earlier works: Laksen, allmuen og staten–Fiskerett og this area. After the Denmark-Norway even though a border had been drawn forvaltning i Tanavassdraget før 1888. Die ut and Sweden-Finland wars in 1611-12, it straight through their areas of use. nr. 2, 1986. Kautokeino, and Lappekodisillen was agreed, at peace talks in 1613, that i Nord 1751-1859–Fra grenseavtale og sikring the coastal and fjord areas of what is Reindeer herding av samenes rettigheter til grensesperring og now the northernmost part of Norway Most of the regulations in the Lapp samisk ulykke. Die ut nr. 3–2008. Kautokeino should be exclusively placed under Codicil are related to reindeer SAMUDRA REPORT NO. 54 TRADITIONAL FISHING husbandry. This is probably because the along the Tana river to claim, for the reindeer-herding Sámi was the group first time, private land properties. of Sámi who most needed to get their Paragraph 6 of the Land Acquisition access to grazing pastures secured on Resolution is of special importance both sides of the border. Sámi salmon as it evolves around the juridical fishery was not explicitly mentioned rights to salmon fishing in the Tana in the Lapp Codicil. Yet the traditional watercourse: “The goods which have so salmon fishing in Deatnu continued, far been common to whole districts or as if the border had never been drawn. Among other things, new co-operative forms and methods of fishing were ...new co-operative forms and methods of fi shing were developed, with the Sámi on both sides developed, with the Sámi on both sides of the river of the river fishing together, indifferent fi shing together, indifferent to the borderline or which to the borderline or which country they country they belonged to. belonged to. This is in line with the structural principle of the Lapp Codicil, namely, that it should secure the material tthto the general l population, ltibthfih be they fish foundations of Sámi culture. There in the sea or the great rivers, as well as are many other examples of the Lapp docking places and such, will remain Codicil playing an important role in available for general use.” securing both rights and administration This meant that salmon fishing within the salmon fishing sphere. was secured and could be carried out The Danish-Norwegian authorities as before, without being hindered argued, at the end of the 18th century, by private land claims along the that the 1751 regulations were central watercourse. It also meant that the 5 juridical fundaments for the salmon general principle in Norway, by which a fishing rights of the settled Sámi on the landowner along a lake or watercourse Norwegian side of the border. also owns the fishing rights adjacent In 1852, the most important to his or her property, would not be provisions of the Lapp Codicil were applied in this case. This was clearly disregarded, and the border between in favour of the common Sámi fishing Norway and Finland was closed for methods used then. reindeer crossings. There were several In 1888, however, the Norwegian reasons for this: the growth in the parliament passed an act which tied population of reindeer owned by the fishing rights to land ownership. Norwegian Sámi who used Finnish KJELL SAETER territory during winter; restrictions imposed by Norwegian authorities on fishing by Finnish citizens in the fjords and coast of northern Norway; diplomatic pressure from Britain on Sweden and Norway not to give undue concessions in negotiations with Russia and Finland; and growing Norwegian nationalism, which led to greater disregard of the Sámi rights laid down in the Lapp Codicil. Salmon fishing, however, remained unaffected, and writings from the 188os indicate that the Lapp Codicil remained a juridical fundament for Sámi salmon fishing in the Tana river. In 1775, the king in Copenhagen introduced the Land Acquisition Resolution, which soon gained legal force and allowed the people living A salmon caught more than 200 km from the river mouth. Salmon fi shing is a fundamental part of Sámi culture on both sides of the Finland-Norway border NOVEMBER 2009 SCANDINAVIA KJELL SAETER The act accorded sole law was passed, also to ensure that any fishing rights in the Tana possible rights of which the Norwegian river to those living in parliament was unaware in 1888 should the river area, either on remain. their own or on leased The permission to allow ‘others’ to land. These were the so- fish with rods for a fee brings up the called ‘entitled owners question of ‘others’. Were these the of fishing’. Additionally, remainder of the valley’s inhabitants it was laid down that the who did not own land, or were they bailiff could allow others visitors? Written records indicate that to fish with rods, for a the ‘others’ were people who travelled fee. in the region, namely, visitors, those Nonetheless, this did who did not belong to the Tana river not mean that the old valley. Neither in the law of 23 July principle of collective 1888 nor in the Royal Resolution fishing rights for the of 4 May 1872—when, for the first inhabitants of the Tana time, it was officially stated that the river valley was broken. bailiff could grant permission for The collective principle angling—is the right of the rest of the was emphasized in the valley’s inhabitants to fish with rods preparatory work for the mentioned. The regulations were only act. It was pronounced meant to secure the admittance of the that salmon fishing until few anglers (tourists) who visited the 1888 had been carried area. out in accordance with Clearly, the ‘others’ clause was 6 the regulations of 1775, introduced only because the authorities Kjell Saeter, the mayor of Karasjok, Norway. Laws have ensured that fi shing is not hindered by private land claims and that the right to fish considered the fundamental rights had been “...considered of the valley’s inhabitants as already Common for the general established. There was no contradiction population along the river, in the between Paragraph 6 in the Land Valley, from the Mouth of the River to Acquisition Resolution of 1775, and the its Outflow”. stipulation of land ownership to obtain Why then did the authorities fishing rights in the law of 1888. regard it necessary to approve a Over a hundred years have new law concerning fishing rights passed since the law of 1888 and it is, in the watercourse, and link it to therefore, likely that both customs and land ownership? It was due to the conceptions of justice have changed. felt responsibility to protect the The true growth of the local hook-and- fishing rights of the population in the line rod fishing occurred at the end of valley—mainly Sámi—against large the 19th century, after the law of 1888 and uncontrolled competition from had gained legal force.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Troms Og Finnmark
    Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Partiet De Kristne Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Svein Svendsen 1993 Alta 2 Karl Tobias Hansen 1992 Tromsø 3 Torleif Selseng 1956 Balsfjord 4 Dag Erik Larssen 1953 Skånland 5 Papy Zefaniya 1986 Sør-Varanger 6 Aud Oddrun Grønning 1940 Tromsø 7 Annbjørg Watnedal 1939 Tromsø 8 Arlene Marie Hansen 1949 Balsfjord 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 1 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Christine Bertheussen Killie 1979 Tjeldsund 2 Jo Inge Hesjevik 1969 Porsanger 3 Benjamin Nordberg Furuly 1996 Bardu 4 Tove Alstadsæter 1967 Sør-Varanger 5 Line Fusdahl 1957 Tromsø 6 Geir-Inge Sivertsen 1965 Senja 7 Kristen Albert Ellingsen 1961 Alta 8 Cecilie Mathisen 1994 Tromsø 9 Lise Svenning 1963 Vadsø 10 Håkon Rønning Vahl 1972 Harstad 11 Steinar Halvorsen 1970 Loppa 12 Tor Arne Johansen Morskogen 1979 Tromsø 13 Gro Marie Johannessen Nilssen 1963 Hasvik 14 Vetle Langedahl 1996 Tromsø 15 Erling Espeland 1976 Alta 16 Kjersti Karijord Smørvik 1966 Harstad 17 Sharon Fjellvang 1999 Nordkapp 18 Nils Ante Oskal Eira 1975 Lavangen 19 Johnny Aikio 1967 Vadsø 20 Remi Iversen 1985 Tromsø 21 Lisbeth Eriksen 1959 Balsfjord 22 Jan Ivvar Juuso Smuk 1987 Nesseby 23 Terje Olsen 1951 Nordreisa 24 Geir-Johnny Varvik 1958 Storfjord 25 Ellen Kristina Saba 1975 Tana 26 Tonje Nilsen 1998 Storfjord 27 Sebastian Hansen Henriksen 1997 Tromsø 28 Ståle Sæther 1973 Loppa 29 Beate Seljenes 1978 Senja 30 Joakim Breivik 1992 Tromsø 31 Jonas Sørum Nymo 1989 Porsanger 32 Ole Even Andreassen 1997 Harstad 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 2 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr.
    [Show full text]
  • Development in the Pink Salmon Catches in the Transboundary Rivers
    Development in the Pink salmon catches in the transboundary rivers of Tana and Neiden-in Norway and Finland Niemelä, Hassinen, Johansen, Kuusela, Länsman, Haantie, Kylmäaho • Who can identify pink and Atlantic salmon • Feelings against pink salmon • First catches in the history • Distribution in the River Tana watershed • Total catches in the rivers Tana and Neiden • Timing of the catches • Ecology ©© NaturalNatural ResourcesResources InstituteInstitute FinlandFinland To recognize silvery pink salmon might be difficult for tourist fishermen or even for some local fishermen early in the summer 2 6.2.2018 © Natural Resources Institute Finland In the second half of July and especially in August fishermen have no problem to distinguish Atlantic salmon and Pacific salmon in the catches 3 6.2.2018 © Natural Resources Institute Finland Fishermen do not like this new fish species in their catches especially in the end of July and August. Why? 4 6.2.2018 © Natural Resources Institute Finland Why not pink salmon in the catches? • Local fishermen are not get used to catch other species than salmon and seatrout • Tourist fishermen have payed a lot of money to catch silvery Atlantic salmon • Local fishermen catching Atlantic salmon with gillnets and weirs have an opinion that pink salmon in their fishing gears are scaring the real target, Atlantic salmon, away. Does this scaring help Atlantic salmon to avoid to be caught with traditional fishing methods? • In rod fishing from shore and boat pink salmon is disturbing the real Atlantic salmon fishery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP)
    The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) Your ref Our ref Date 18/2098-13 27 February 2019 The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) – Norway's contribution to the report focusing on recognition, reparation and reconciliation With reference to the letter of 20th November 2018 from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights where we were invited to contribute to the report of the Expert Mechanism on recognition, reparation and reconciliation initiatives in the last 10 years. Development of the Norwegian Sami policy For centuries, the goal of Norwegian Sami policy was to assimilate the Sami into the Norwegian population. For instance Sami language was banned in schools. In 1997 the King, on behalf of the Norwegian Government, gave an official apology to the Sami people for the unjust treatment and assimilation policies. The Sami policy in Norway today is based on the recognition that the state of Norway was established on the territory of two peoples – the Norwegians and the Sami – and that both these peoples have the same right to develop their culture and language. Legislation and programmes have been established to strengthen Sami languages, culture, industries and society. As examples we will highlight the establishment of the Sámediggi (the Sami parliament in Norway) in 1989, the Procedures for Consultations between the State Authorities and Sámediggi of 11 May 2005 and the Sami Act. More information about these policies can be found in Norway's reports on the implementation of the ILO Convention No. 169 and relevant UN Conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • General Fishing Rules for Visitors Anglers in Tana River System
    Tanavassdragets fiskeforvaltning- Deanučázádaga guolástanhálddahus-Tana River Fish Management General fishing rules for visitors anglers in Tana River System 1. Fishing areas Persons living permanently in Norway are permitted to fish on the border area, in the Norwegian tributaries and in the lower, Norwegian part of Tana River. Persons not living permanently in Norway, are not allowed to fish in the Norwegian tributaries of Tana river, except in the lower part of Tana main stem and the lower part of Kárášjohka downstream the joint of Iešjohka and Kárášjohka. The fishing rules for the Tana River applies for the salmon-area. In some of the tributaries that area is marked with signs. Above the salmon-area, the ordinary rules and fishing license for freshwater fisheries in Finnmark, apply. 2. Fishing time Fishing is prohibited from Sunday 18:00 hrs to Monday 180:0 hrs (Norwegian time). There is one exception: the area from Tana River mouth up to Langnes. 3. Minimum size Catching salmon, trout or char smaller than 25 cm is prohibited. Kelts must be released to the river. 4. Forbidden methods and areas Prohibited baits: prawns, shrimps, fish and earthworms. Using the fishing gear to hook the fish is not allowed. Rod fishing is prohibited within the fish fence guide-nets, within 50 m downstream of the fence, and 10 m to either side. Fishing is also prohibited within a 10 m distance from gill nets. In the main river it is prohibited to fish with rod from shore and boat within a 50 m distance downstream and upstream of the river mouths of salmon tributaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Statusrapport for Artsregistrering Av Virvelløse Dyr, Sopp Og Karplanter 2017 Øygarden, Hordaland, Kautokeino, Porsanger Og Nordkapp, Finnmark
    SABIMA kartleggingsnotat 20-2017 Statusrapport for artsregistrering av virvelløse dyr, sopp og karplanter 2017 Øygarden, Hordaland, Kautokeino, Porsanger og Nordkapp, Finnmark Av Sissel og Nigel Goodgame Blektuppet småkøllesopp Clavulinopsis laeticolor Kartleggingsnotat 20, 2017 – Artskartlegging i Hordaland og Finnmark 2017 1 av 23 Sammendrag Emneord: Kartlegging, sopp, insekter, planter; Hordaland, Finnmark Årets artsregistreringer har i hovedsak konsentrert seg om områder i Porsanger, Kautokeino og Nordkapp, hvor vi har forsøkt å finne så mange arter som mulig i ved tre forskjellige anledninger. Vi har brukt mye tid til feltobservasjoner av planter, sopp og innsekter i flere områder i Goarahat og Sandvikhalvøya, i tillegg noen registreringer i forbindelse med et TOV-E prosjekt for fugletelling på Finnmarksvidda og i Nordkapp kommune på en dagstur. Resultatet for feltobservasjonene ble 194 totalt arter registrert, med 85 nye arter registrert for Goarahat og Sandvikhalvøya, 16 nye arter for Porsanger og 4 første og 2 andre for Finnmark. Disse tallene er basert på data registrert Artsobservasjoner. I tillegg registrerte vi 21 arter i Kautokeino kommune og 33 arter i Nordkapp kommune. Vi gjorde en liten innsats med lysfelle i Øygarden noen få netter i 2017, men det var lite oppholdsvær og vanskelige forhold å jobbe under. I tillegg var vi i Finnmark store deler av sesongen. Personer involvert Bidragsytere til årets artsregistreringer har også i år vært Sissel og Nigel Goodgame, med god hjelp fra vår kollega Jeff Blincow fra England, som har bidratt med sin ekspertise og hjulpet til med artsbestemmelse og fotografier. Calathus micropterus Hygrocybe conica Helvella arctoalpina Kartleggingsnotat 20, 2017 – Artskartlegging i Hordaland og Finnmark 2017 2 av 23 Aktivitet Registreringen har pågått i to perioder: 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the River Tana Salmon Populations
    STATUS OF THE RIVER TANA SALMON POPULATIONS REPORT 1-2012 OF THE WORKING GROUP ON SALMON MONITORING AND RESEARCH IN THE TANA RIVER SYSTEM Contents 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 The group mandate and presentation of members ..................................................................... 10 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 11 4 The River Tana, the Tana salmon, salmon fisheries and management ........................................ 12 4.1 The Tana and its salmon ....................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Tana salmon fisheries ........................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Management of the Tana salmon fishing ............................................................................. 28 5 Local/traditional knowledge and local contact ............................................................................. 29 5.1 How the Group will approach these issues........................................................................... 29 5.2 Current locally raised issues .................................................................................................. 31 5.2.1 Predation ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
    Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Randomised Trial Ane Kokkvoll,1 Sameline Grimsgaard,2,3 Rønnaug Ødegaard,4,5 Trond Flægstad,6,7 Inger Njølstad3
    ADC Online First, published on December 11, 2013 as 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303571 Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303571 on 11 December 2013. Downloaded from Original article Single versus multiple-family intervention in childhood overweight—Finnmark Activity School: a randomised trial Ane Kokkvoll,1 Sameline Grimsgaard,2,3 Rønnaug Ødegaard,4,5 Trond Flægstad,6,7 Inger Njølstad3 1Department of Paediatrics, ABSTRACT Hammerfest Hospital, Objective To compare a new comprehensive lifestyle What is already known Hammerfest, Norway 2Clinical Research Department, programme performed in groups of families with overweight (included obese) children with a more University Hospital of North ▸ Standard hospital treatment for childhood Norway, Tromsø, Norway conventional single-family programme. The study design 3 obesity has been reported to be ineffective. Department of Community and interim anthropometrical results after 12 months are ▸ Reviews evaluating child obesity interventions Medicine, Faculty of Health presented. Sciences, University of Tromsø, conclude that comprehensive treatment models Design Altogether 97 overweight and obese children Tromsø, Norway appear effective, but underline that the 4 aged 6–12 years with body mass index (BMI) Department of Paediatrics, knowledge base to inform treatment strategies St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, corresponding to cut-off point ≥27.5 in adults were is limited. Norway included. Study participants were randomised to 5 ▸ Most childhood obesity programmes are Department of Laboratory multiple-family intervention (MUFI) or single-family Medicine, Children’s and performed in hospital settings and there is ’ intervention (SIFI) in a parallel design. MUFI comprised a Women s Health, Norwegian limited data on long-term effects (beyond University of Science and 3-day inpatient programme at the hospital with other 1 year).
    [Show full text]
  • Sámi Salmon, State Salmon: LEK, Technoscience and Care1
    Sámi Salmon, State Salmon: LEK, Technoscience and Care1 Solveig Joksa and John Law b a Sámi Allaskuvla, Sámi University of Applied Science Hánnoluohkká 45, NO-9520 Guovdageaidnu, Norway [email protected] b Department of Sociology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK, [email protected] and Centre for Science Studies, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YN 10 March 2016; JoksLaw2016SamiSalmonScienceSalmon.pdf 1 We are grateful to Petter Somby, Aslak Varsi, Johannes Varsi and all the other fishing people on the Deatnu who talked with Solveig and so willingly shared their knowledge with her in the course of her fieldwork. Solveig would also like to thank Sámi Allaskuvla for financial support for the PhD-research on which this paper is based. Finally she thanks her supervisor Britt Kramvig who has supported her during the fieldwork and the writing of her dissertation. 1 ‘Nowadays there are so many people fishing. And of course they will catch fish if they fish day and night. The problem is that the fish never get any peace, not even for an hour.’ (The words of Petter Somby, Tana River fisherman) ‘An overview of threat factors in the Tana show that overexploitation of salmon in the different parts of the salmon migratory system is the major threat factor for Tana salmon.’ (A view from the biologists)2 Introduction In Sámi ‘Deatnu’ means ‘the big river’. It is also the Sámi name for a major river in Sápmi in north Norway and Finland.3 Deatnu is one of the most important salmon rivers of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Cultures in Sápmi
    Theses and Papers in Scientific Archaeology 16 Markus Fjellström This thesis concerns the study of diet and mobility of humans and animals living in Sápmi between 600 and 1900 AD. It is through the Food Cultures in Sápmi employment of stable isotope analysis, elemental analysis and radiocarbon dating of human and faunal skeletal remains that food An interdisciplinary approach to the study of the heterogeneous culture in (pre-)historic Sápmi is highlighted. Moreover, the ethics of cultural landscape of northern Fennoscandia AD 600–1900 repatriation and reburial is discussed. The investigations demonstrate that Sápmi is a culturally heterogeneous landscape, which constantly Cultures in Sápmi Food changes. Markus Fjellström The results from the different case studies have demonstrated that differences in food consumption reflect a multicultural landscape, where intra-individual analysis of diet and mobility provided information on more complex societies. Further, the results indicated that reindeer protein was not a major food source at the sites studied. Finally, the mining activities at Silbojokk can be seen as the result of colonial infraction on nature and people in Sápmi by the Swedish state. Markus Fjellström is an archaeologist at the Archaeological Research Laboratory. His main research concerns diet and mobility patterns from the Late Iron Age to the Early Modern period in Sápmi. He also has an interest in glacial archaeology and climate change. ISBN 978-91-7911-064-2 ISSN 1400-7835 Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies Doctoral Thesis in Scientific Archaeology at Stockholm University, Sweden 2020 Food Cultures in Sápmi An interdisciplinary approach to the study of the heterogeneous cultural landscape of northern Fennoscandia AD 600–1900 Markus Fjellström Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Scientific Archaeology at Stockholm University to be publicly defended on Friday 8 May 2020 at 13.00 in Nordenskiöldsalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Reindeer Husbandry and Barents 2030 Impacts of Future Petroleum Development on Reindeer Husbandry in the Barents Region
    Sven Skaltje REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 IMPACTS OF FUTURE PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT ON REINDEER HUSBANDRY IN THE BARENTS REGION A REPORT PREPARED FOR STATOILHYDRO BY THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR REINDEER HUSBANDRY REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 1 This work is linked to the framework of the International Polar Year as part of the International Polar Year (IPY) con- sortium EALÁT (IPY Project #399): Climate change and reindeer husbandry. This report and implementation of the recommendations included herein are seen as a further contribution to the legacy of the IPY. Layout: UNEP/GRID-Arendal Printing: Fagtrykk Idé AS, Alta, Norway Disclaimer I The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organisa- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Disclaimer II This report has been commissioned by StatoilHydro ASA and un- dertaken by the International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry. Sta- toilHydro ASA has commissioned four parallel scenario reports for the Barents Region on respectively climate change, socio-econom- ic consequences, environmental issues and reindeer husbandry. The joint project was initiated as part of StatoilHydro’s preparations for a strategic action plan for future oil and gas developments in the High
    [Show full text]
  • TANA RIVER SYSTEM Prices of a Day License
    Fishing in the TANA RIVER SYSTEM Prices of a day license INFORMATION TO VISITING ANGLERS shoreline Tana River Fish Management - Tanavassdragets fiskeforvaltning (TF) Fishing of the shoreline the of Fishing Youth (16-18years Youth old) is responsible for selling the fishing licenses and providing information Fishing from a boat, 3 rods 3 boat, a from Fishing Fishing form a boat and of the the of and boat a form Fishing to anglers on the Norwegian side of the Tana River. In this folder we Tana munning - Langnes (munningssonen) 250,- 100,- present the fishing rules and some of the most relevant information for visiting anglers. For further information, see our web-page Tana munning til Riksgrensen 500,- 800,- 100,- www.tanafisk.no. Riksgrensen - Láksjohka 500,- 800,- * Fishing license Láksjohka - Luossnjargguoika 500,- 800,- * Visiting anglers are only allowed to buy day licenses. Each fishing day Luosnjagguoika - Borsejohka 500,- 800,- * starts at 1800 hours, Norwegian time. The boat licenses are valid 24 Borsejohka - Ráidennjarga 500,- 800,- * hours from. On the border stretch visiting anglers must be accompanied by a local rower from 1800 to 0600 hours next day. In the Anárjohka 500,- 800,- * lower Norwegian part of the Tana river visiting anglers must be Anárjohka, øvre norsk del 500,- 100,- accompanied by a local rower at all time during boat fishing. The shore Luovvtejohka/Luftjok 100,- 100,- licenses at the border stretch are valid from 2200 to 1500 hours the next day. Máskejohka/Masjok 450,- 100,- Only permanent residents in Norway can buy a fishing license for the Buolmátjohka/Polmakelva 350,- 100,- Norwegian tributaries.
    [Show full text]