DOCSLIB.ORG

Planprogram+Datert++230911.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planprogram+Datert++230911.Pdf REGULERINGSPLAN MED KONSEKVENSUTREDNING FOR ETABLERING AV GRUVEDRIFT I BIEDJOVÁGGI KAUTOKEINO OG NORDREISA KOMMUNER FORSLAG TIL PLANPROGRAM 23.09.11 PLANPROGRAM BIEDJOVÁGGI Oppdragsnr.: 7110385A Oppdragsnavn: Planprogram for etablering av gruvevirksomhet i Biedjovággi Dokument nr.: 1 Filnavn: \\nor-s02\L:\oppdrag2011\planprogram bidjovagge gruver, Kautokeino kommune Dato 23.09.11 Utarbeidet av Reidar Olsen Kontrollert av Ulla Sennesvik Godkjent av Lars Kvernmo Beskrivelse Planprogram Revisjonsoversikt Revisjon Dato Revisjonen gjelder Adresser: Arctic Gold AB Postadresse: P.O Box 275, SE-751 05, Uppsala Besøksadresse: Telefon: +46 18 15 64 23 Mobil: +46 70 673 32 94 Epost: [email protected] Hjemmeside: www.arctic.gold.se Rambøll Postadresse: Kongleveien 45, 9510 Alta Besøksadresse: Kongleveien 45 Telefon: +47 78 44 92 22 Telefaks: +47 78 44 92 20 Epost: [email protected] Hjemmeside: www.ramboll.no Rambøll Kongleveien 45 PLANPROGRAM BIEDJOVÁGGI 3 (78) INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE 1. FORORD ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2. INNLEDNING OG BAKGRUNN ........................................................................................... 8 2.1 Kort presentasjon av Arctic Gold AB ............................................................................... 8 2.2 Om planarbeidet ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Formålet med planprogrammet ......................................................................................... 8 2.4 Krav om konsekvensutredning .......................................................................................... 9 2.5 Om reguleringsplanen ............................................................................................................ 9 3. BESKRIVELSE AV PLANOMRÅDET ............................................................................... 10 3.1 Planområdets lokalisering og avgrensning ............................................................... 10 3.2 Kort om Kautokeino og Nordreisa kommuner .......................................................... 12 3.2.1 Kautokeino kommune ............................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Nordreisa kommune .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.3 Tidligere gruvedrift og letevirksomhet ........................................................................ 14 3.4 Eiendomsforhold ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Naturforhold .............................................................................................................................. 19 3.5.1 Klimatiske forhold ...................................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.2 Landskap og naturforhold ....................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.3 Dyre- og planteliv ...................................................................................................................................... 20 3.5.4 Grunnforhold ................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.5.5 Kulturminner ................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.6 Naturressurser ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.6.1 Reindrift ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.7 Samfunnsinteresser .............................................................................................................. 22 3.7.1 Atkomstveg .................................................................................................................................................. 22 3.7.2 Øvrig teknisk infrastruktur ..................................................................................................................... 25 Ramboll 4 (78) KAUTOKEINO OG NORDREISA KOMMUNER 3.7.3 Friluftsliv/utmarksbruk ............................................................................................................................. 26 4. BESKRIVELSE AV TILTAKET ............................................................................................. 26 4.1 Kjente mineralforekomster og mineralressurser ................................................... 26 4.1.1 Generelt ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Områder med godkjent undersøkelsestillatelse .............................................................................. 28 4.1.3 Områder med godkjent utvinningsrett ............................................................................................... 29 4.1.4 Planlagt lete- og prospekteringsvirksomhet .................................................................................... 30 4.2 Uttaksområder og driftsformer ....................................................................................... 31 4.2.1 Generelt ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Lokalisering av malmuttaksområder og driftsformer innenfor disse ...................................... 31 4.2.3 Driftsmetoder ............................................................................................................................................... 33 4.3 Oppredningsmetode (anrikning) .................................................................................... 36 4.4 Massedeponering .................................................................................................................... 37 4.4.1 Avgangsmasser ........................................................................................................................................... 37 4.4.2 Gråberg .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 4.5 Bygningsanlegg ....................................................................................................................... 44 4.6 Størrelse og omfang på drifta .......................................................................................... 46 4.7 Transportbehov (atkomstveg) ......................................................................................... 46 4.8 Utslipp og støy ......................................................................................................................... 46 4.9 Øvrig teknisk infrastruktur ................................................................................................ 47 4.10 Personell og arbeidskraft ................................................................................................ 48 4.11 Nødvendige tillatelser/godkjenninger/planer ..................................................... 49 4.11.1 Behov for tillatelser/godkjenninger: ................................................................................................... 49 4.11.2 Oppstart og driftstid .................................................................................................................................. 49 5. OVERORDNEDE PLANER OG RETNINGSLINJER ................................................ 50 5.1 Statlige og regionale føringer .......................................................................................... 50 5.1.1 Nasjonale miljømål .................................................................................................................................... 50 5.1.2 Rikspolitisk retningslinje for samordnet areal- og transportplanlegging ............................... 50 5.1.3 Forskrift om vern for Reisa nasjonalpark (Ráisa álmotlas meahcci). ..................................... 50 5.1.4 Utkast til verneplan for myrer og våtmarker ................................................................................... 51 5.1.5 Verneplan III for vassdrag ...................................................................................................................... 52 5.1.6 Retningslinje for behandling av støy i arealplaner ........................................................................ 52 5.1.7 Inngrepsfrie naturområder (INON): .................................................................................................... 53 5.1.8 Sametingets retningslinjer for endret bruk av utmark (meahcci) ........................................... 53 5.1.9 Sametingets mineralveileder for undersøkelser og drift på mineralressurser .................... 53 5.1.10 Sametingets planveileder ........................................................................................................................ 53 5.1.11 Fylkesplaner ................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Troms Og Finnmark
    Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Partiet De Kristne Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Svein Svendsen 1993 Alta 2 Karl Tobias Hansen 1992 Tromsø 3 Torleif Selseng 1956 Balsfjord 4 Dag Erik Larssen 1953 Skånland 5 Papy Zefaniya 1986 Sør-Varanger 6 Aud Oddrun Grønning 1940 Tromsø 7 Annbjørg Watnedal 1939 Tromsø 8 Arlene Marie Hansen 1949 Balsfjord 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 1 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Christine Bertheussen Killie 1979 Tjeldsund 2 Jo Inge Hesjevik 1969 Porsanger 3 Benjamin Nordberg Furuly 1996 Bardu 4 Tove Alstadsæter 1967 Sør-Varanger 5 Line Fusdahl 1957 Tromsø 6 Geir-Inge Sivertsen 1965 Senja 7 Kristen Albert Ellingsen 1961 Alta 8 Cecilie Mathisen 1994 Tromsø 9 Lise Svenning 1963 Vadsø 10 Håkon Rønning Vahl 1972 Harstad 11 Steinar Halvorsen 1970 Loppa 12 Tor Arne Johansen Morskogen 1979 Tromsø 13 Gro Marie Johannessen Nilssen 1963 Hasvik 14 Vetle Langedahl 1996 Tromsø 15 Erling Espeland 1976 Alta 16 Kjersti Karijord Smørvik 1966 Harstad 17 Sharon Fjellvang 1999 Nordkapp 18 Nils Ante Oskal Eira 1975 Lavangen 19 Johnny Aikio 1967 Vadsø 20 Remi Iversen 1985 Tromsø 21 Lisbeth Eriksen 1959 Balsfjord 22 Jan Ivvar Juuso Smuk 1987 Nesseby 23 Terje Olsen 1951 Nordreisa 24 Geir-Johnny Varvik 1958 Storfjord 25 Ellen Kristina Saba 1975 Tana 26 Tonje Nilsen 1998 Storfjord 27 Sebastian Hansen Henriksen 1997 Tromsø 28 Ståle Sæther 1973 Loppa 29 Beate Seljenes 1978 Senja 30 Joakim Breivik 1992 Tromsø 31 Jonas Sørum Nymo 1989 Porsanger 32 Ole Even Andreassen 1997 Harstad 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 2 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Sans Borders
    Scandinavia TRADITIONAL FISHING Salmon Sans Borders Fishing for salmon along the Deatnu or Tana river has long been fundamental to the culture of the indigenous Sámi people along the Finland-Norway border ishing for salmon (Salmo Danish-Norwegian jurisdiction. This salar) along the over 200-km had consequences for the territorial Fwatercourse on the border of division of the Tana river valley too. Finland and Norway, called Deatnu From then until the present border (in the Sámi language) or Tana (in was drawn in 1751, Denmark-Norway Norwegian), has been going on for at had exclusive jurisdiction over the least 7,000 to 8,000 years, or for as long lowest 30-40 km of the river. Juridical as human existence after the last Ice and clerical jurisdiction over the rest Age. The Tana river valley is situated in of the valley belonged to the Swedish an area in which the Sámi are the oldest realm. But the Sámi still had to pay known ethnic group. Sámi culture, as taxes to Denmark-Norway. it exists in northern Scandinavia and Until 1809, Finland belonged to 4 the northwestern parts of Russia, is at Sweden. Then it became a Grand Duchy least 2,000 to 3,000 years old. Salmon under the Russian Tsar. The border fishing remains a fundamental part along the Tana watercourse became the of Sámi culture on both sides of the border between Finland and Norway. Finland-Norway border. Neither this change, nor the separation The first written sources from this of Norway from Denmark in 1814 river district date to the end of the 16th and its union with Sweden, had any century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP)
    The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) Your ref Our ref Date 18/2098-13 27 February 2019 The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) – Norway's contribution to the report focusing on recognition, reparation and reconciliation With reference to the letter of 20th November 2018 from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights where we were invited to contribute to the report of the Expert Mechanism on recognition, reparation and reconciliation initiatives in the last 10 years. Development of the Norwegian Sami policy For centuries, the goal of Norwegian Sami policy was to assimilate the Sami into the Norwegian population. For instance Sami language was banned in schools. In 1997 the King, on behalf of the Norwegian Government, gave an official apology to the Sami people for the unjust treatment and assimilation policies. The Sami policy in Norway today is based on the recognition that the state of Norway was established on the territory of two peoples – the Norwegians and the Sami – and that both these peoples have the same right to develop their culture and language. Legislation and programmes have been established to strengthen Sami languages, culture, industries and society. As examples we will highlight the establishment of the Sámediggi (the Sami parliament in Norway) in 1989, the Procedures for Consultations between the State Authorities and Sámediggi of 11 May 2005 and the Sami Act. More information about these policies can be found in Norway's reports on the implementation of the ILO Convention No. 169 and relevant UN Conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Statusrapport for Artsregistrering Av Virvelløse Dyr, Sopp Og Karplanter 2017 Øygarden, Hordaland, Kautokeino, Porsanger Og Nordkapp, Finnmark
    SABIMA kartleggingsnotat 20-2017 Statusrapport for artsregistrering av virvelløse dyr, sopp og karplanter 2017 Øygarden, Hordaland, Kautokeino, Porsanger og Nordkapp, Finnmark Av Sissel og Nigel Goodgame Blektuppet småkøllesopp Clavulinopsis laeticolor Kartleggingsnotat 20, 2017 – Artskartlegging i Hordaland og Finnmark 2017 1 av 23 Sammendrag Emneord: Kartlegging, sopp, insekter, planter; Hordaland, Finnmark Årets artsregistreringer har i hovedsak konsentrert seg om områder i Porsanger, Kautokeino og Nordkapp, hvor vi har forsøkt å finne så mange arter som mulig i ved tre forskjellige anledninger. Vi har brukt mye tid til feltobservasjoner av planter, sopp og innsekter i flere områder i Goarahat og Sandvikhalvøya, i tillegg noen registreringer i forbindelse med et TOV-E prosjekt for fugletelling på Finnmarksvidda og i Nordkapp kommune på en dagstur. Resultatet for feltobservasjonene ble 194 totalt arter registrert, med 85 nye arter registrert for Goarahat og Sandvikhalvøya, 16 nye arter for Porsanger og 4 første og 2 andre for Finnmark. Disse tallene er basert på data registrert Artsobservasjoner. I tillegg registrerte vi 21 arter i Kautokeino kommune og 33 arter i Nordkapp kommune. Vi gjorde en liten innsats med lysfelle i Øygarden noen få netter i 2017, men det var lite oppholdsvær og vanskelige forhold å jobbe under. I tillegg var vi i Finnmark store deler av sesongen. Personer involvert Bidragsytere til årets artsregistreringer har også i år vært Sissel og Nigel Goodgame, med god hjelp fra vår kollega Jeff Blincow fra England, som har bidratt med sin ekspertise og hjulpet til med artsbestemmelse og fotografier. Calathus micropterus Hygrocybe conica Helvella arctoalpina Kartleggingsnotat 20, 2017 – Artskartlegging i Hordaland og Finnmark 2017 2 av 23 Aktivitet Registreringen har pågått i to perioder: 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
    Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Randomised Trial Ane Kokkvoll,1 Sameline Grimsgaard,2,3 Rønnaug Ødegaard,4,5 Trond Flægstad,6,7 Inger Njølstad3
    ADC Online First, published on December 11, 2013 as 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303571 Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303571 on 11 December 2013. Downloaded from Original article Single versus multiple-family intervention in childhood overweight—Finnmark Activity School: a randomised trial Ane Kokkvoll,1 Sameline Grimsgaard,2,3 Rønnaug Ødegaard,4,5 Trond Flægstad,6,7 Inger Njølstad3 1Department of Paediatrics, ABSTRACT Hammerfest Hospital, Objective To compare a new comprehensive lifestyle What is already known Hammerfest, Norway 2Clinical Research Department, programme performed in groups of families with overweight (included obese) children with a more University Hospital of North ▸ Standard hospital treatment for childhood Norway, Tromsø, Norway conventional single-family programme. The study design 3 obesity has been reported to be ineffective. Department of Community and interim anthropometrical results after 12 months are ▸ Reviews evaluating child obesity interventions Medicine, Faculty of Health presented. Sciences, University of Tromsø, conclude that comprehensive treatment models Design Altogether 97 overweight and obese children Tromsø, Norway appear effective, but underline that the 4 aged 6–12 years with body mass index (BMI) Department of Paediatrics, knowledge base to inform treatment strategies St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, corresponding to cut-off point ≥27.5 in adults were is limited. Norway included. Study participants were randomised to 5 ▸ Most childhood obesity programmes are Department of Laboratory multiple-family intervention (MUFI) or single-family Medicine, Children’s and performed in hospital settings and there is ’ intervention (SIFI) in a parallel design. MUFI comprised a Women s Health, Norwegian limited data on long-term effects (beyond University of Science and 3-day inpatient programme at the hospital with other 1 year).
    [Show full text]
  • Reindeer Husbandry and Barents 2030 Impacts of Future Petroleum Development on Reindeer Husbandry in the Barents Region
    Sven Skaltje REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 IMPACTS OF FUTURE PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT ON REINDEER HUSBANDRY IN THE BARENTS REGION A REPORT PREPARED FOR STATOILHYDRO BY THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR REINDEER HUSBANDRY REINDEER HUSBANDRY AND BARENTS 2030 1 This work is linked to the framework of the International Polar Year as part of the International Polar Year (IPY) con- sortium EALÁT (IPY Project #399): Climate change and reindeer husbandry. This report and implementation of the recommendations included herein are seen as a further contribution to the legacy of the IPY. Layout: UNEP/GRID-Arendal Printing: Fagtrykk Idé AS, Alta, Norway Disclaimer I The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organisa- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Disclaimer II This report has been commissioned by StatoilHydro ASA and un- dertaken by the International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry. Sta- toilHydro ASA has commissioned four parallel scenario reports for the Barents Region on respectively climate change, socio-econom- ic consequences, environmental issues and reindeer husbandry. The joint project was initiated as part of StatoilHydro’s preparations for a strategic action plan for future oil and gas developments in the High
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Studies
    JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES Volume 16 Number 2 May 2013 JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS OFFICE Journal of Finnish Studies, Department of English, 1901 University Avenue, Evans 458 (P.O. Box 2146), Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TEXAS 77341-2146, USA Tel. 1.936.294.1402; Fax 1.936.294.1408 SUBSCRIPTIONS, ADVERTISING, AND INQUIRIES Contact Business Office (see above & below). EDITORIAL STAFF Helena Halmari, Editor-in-Chief, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hanna Snellman, Co-Editor, University of Helsinki; [email protected] Scott Kaukonen, Associate Editor, Sam Houston State University; [email protected] Hilary Joy Virtanen, Assistant Editor, University of Wisconsin; [email protected] Sheila Embleton, Book Review Editor, York University; [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Börje Vähämäki, Founding Editor, JoFS, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Raimo Anttila, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Michael Branch, Professor Emeritus, University of London Thomas DuBois, Professor, University of Wisconsin Sheila Embleton, Distinguished Research Professor, York University, Toronto Aili Flint, Emerita Senior Lecturer, Associate Research Scholar, Columbia University, New York Anselm Hollo, Professor, Naropa Institute, Boulder, Colorado Richard Impola, Professor Emeritus, New Paltz, New York Daniel Karvonen, Senior Lecturer, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Andrew Nestingen, Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle Jyrki Nummi, Professor, Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics
    Dieđut 1/2011 Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics Writings from the Arbediehtu Pilot Project on Documentation and Protection of Sami Traditional Knowledge Edited by Jelena Porsanger Gunvor Guttorm Sámi allaskuvla / Sámi University College Working with Traditional Knowledge: Communities, Institutions, Information Systems, Law and Ethics Acknow ledge ments Many individuals, local Sami com mu nities and institutions have contri buted to the Árbediehtu pilot project in the period from 2008 to 2011. One of the important objectives of the project has been to listen to and take into account what Sami people expect from the work on documentation and protection of their traditional know ledge. Special gratitude is owed to communities and individuals in the Norwegian, Swedish and Finnish parts of Sápmi, who eagerly participated in community meetings and other project activities. Sami communities have been important partners in the project, which would not have been possible without their support, collabo ration and genuine interest. We are grateful to the communities and all individual árbečeahpit (tradition- bearers) in the following places: In the Coastal Sami area c/o the Sea Sami Centre of Expertise: Jáhkovuotna/Kokelv, Čuđegieddi/Kistrand, Billávuotna/Bille fjord, Cuop pogieddi/Sandvik, Jovnnanjárga/Jonsnes, Ráigešája/Igeldas, Rávt toš njárga/Stabbursnes, Leavdnja/Lakselv, Breannjá/Brenna, Keaisa/Kjæs. In the Lule Sami area c/o the Árran – Lule Sami Centre: Ájluokta/Drag, Gásluokta/Kjøps vik, Ájládde/Hellands berg, Måsske/Musken, Vuodnabahta/Hellemobotn. In the Northern Sami area c/o the museum association RiddoDuottarMuseat: Kárášjohka/Karasjok, Näkkälä järvi, Áidejávri, Guovdageaidnu/ Kauto keino. In the Southern Sami area c/o Saemien Sijte (South Sami Museum and Cultural Centre): The following reindeer herding communities: Luvlie-Nåamesjen Båatsoe/Østre Namdal, Åarjel-Njaarke/Vestre Namdal, Fovsen-Njaarke/Fosen, Låarte/Luru, and Trollheimen Sijte.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating 137Cs Ingestion Doses to Saamis in Kautokeino (Norway) Using Whole Body Counting Vs
    Estimating 137Cs ingestion doses to Saamis in Kautokeino (Norway) using whole body counting vs. dietary survey results and food samples Lavrans Skuterud, Tone Bergan and Hanne Mehii Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, P.O.Box 55, N-1332 østeras, Norway Introduction Following the findings of elevated concentrations of radioactive caesium (i.e., 137 Cs) in humans consuming reindeer meat in the early 1960'ies, Norwegian authorities initiated a monitoring programme among reindeer keeping Saamis in Kautokeino (690N, 230E) in 1965. Results of the studies for the period 1965-1983 were summarised by Westerlund et al. (1987). Updates on the results of the whole body monitoring (up to 1999) and analyses of reindeer meat samples (to 1996) were presented by Skuterud et al. (1999). From 1965 to 1990 whole body measurements were carried out on an annual basis. Since then, 3- year cycles have been followed. In most years, the reindeer keepers have provided samples of reindeer meat for radiocaesium analysis. In 1989-1990 and 1999 dietary surveys were performed in conjunction with the whole-body monitoring. Earlier diet information is available from a separate study in 1963. Rough estimates of the radiocaesium intake by the studied population in Kautokeino have indicated that the dietary surveys have overestimated the radiocaesium intake. The aim of the present study (a part of the NKS-BOK-2.1.2 project) was to evaluate the available information from Kautokeino, and to derive some conclusions regarding the reindeer meat consumption by today's reindeer keepers, and what 137 Cs ingestion doses they are exposed to. Materials and methods Every year the monitoring has taken place in end March or early April, as this is assumed to give results representative of the annual mean whole body activity concentrations (Berteig et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to Sámi Indigenous Sovereignty in an Era of Climate Change
    Challenges to Sámi Indigenous Sovereignty in an Era of Climate Change BY Paula I. Smith Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and Atmospheric Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. _____________________________ Chairperson: Stephen L. Egbert _____________________________ Committee Member: Peter Herlihy ______________________________ Committee Member: Daniel Wildcat Date Defended: August 28, 2017 The Thesis Committee for Paula I. Smith certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Challenges to Sámi Indigenous Sovereignty in an Era of Climate Change _____________________________ Chairperson: Stephen L. Egbert Date approved: August 31, 2017 ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank those who saw this thesis to the end. Especially, my advisor Dr. Stephen L. Egbert for his support, patience, and respect during the thesis process. Dr. Daniel Wildcat who always had words of wisdom and a funny story to share. Dr. Joane Nagel asking, “Paula, what is it you want?” and soon thereafter, making the impossible possible and pushing my limits. I will forever be indebted to her. To my dear friend Dr. Megan Holroyd who took on my children while I travelled abroad and the countless video chats during this time. To my father, Chippy, for saying “yes” when I needed him and my mother who saw me to the end. Also, thank you to my grandma “B” for visiting with me throughout these last few years. The Turi family, I am forever grateful to have participated in the reindeer migration and allowing me to learn and make mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Arctic Council
    Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Arctic Council Working Group Kautokeino, Finnmark, Norway February 1-2, 2017 TRAVEL AND LOGISTICAL INFORMATION Meeting The CAFF meeting will be held in the town of Kautokeino, Finnmark, Norway from February 1-2, 2017 and will take place at the Diehtosiida knowledge and conference centre [see map here]. Accommodations: A block of rooms has been reserved at the Thon Hotel Kautokeino. In order to take advantage of the block booking rate of NOK 985 (approximately $120 US/ night including breakfast) delegates are asked to book their accommodation by January 2. Reservations at the Thon Hotel Kautokeino can be made by emailing [email protected] and quoting the reference code: 24451061. Registration: All delegates are required to register for the CAFF Biennial through the following website [http://caff.is/caff-biennial-kautokeino]. The registration website will be open from until December 19. Entry formalities All delegates must possess valid travel documents and, where necessary, a visa for entry into Norway. Visa requests should be submitted via the Norwegian Embassy in the delegation’s national capital. For current information on which countries require a visa to travel to Norway, please visit https://www.udi.no/en/want-to-apply/visit-and-holiday/ Transportation Travel options to Kautokeino will entail a flight to Alta and a bus journey from Alta to Kautokeino. Flight options from Oslo to Alta are: January 30: SAS SK4546 Oslo – Alta kl. 12:15 – 14:10 January 31: SAS SK4546 Oslo – Alta kl. 12:15 – 14:10 February 3: Norwegian DY321, Alta – Oslo kl.
    [Show full text]