Tempelhof - Articulating the Void

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tempelhof - Articulating the Void Tempelhof - Articulating the void Niamh Lincoln 1. a Tempelhof - Articulating the void Niamh Lincoln With special thanks to Florian Kossak and Klaus DeWinder. Content January 2014 - A stroll through Tempelhof 8 - 9 Preamble 12 Chapter One - The stages of Tempelhofer Feld. History and continued discourse 16 - 47 From meadow to airfield 16 - 21 The third reich’s aerial gateway 22 - 35 Symbol of liberation 36 - 37 The end of the airport 38 - 39 Tempelhofer Feld as public space 40 - 47 Chapter Two - Tempelhof as void 48 - 88 The void as memory 54 - 59 The void as authentic space 60 - 61 The void as vulnerability 62 - 65 The void as escape 66 - 71 The void as absence of function 72 - 75 The void unrestored 76 - 79 The void as liberation 80 - 89 Chapter Three - Tempelhofer Feld für Alle 90 - 107 The power of non-intervention 108 - 115 Bibliography 118 - 129 Image credits 130 - 135 6 8 - 9 12 16 - 47 16 - 21 22 - 35 36 - 37 38 - 39 40 - 47 48 - 88 54 - 59 60 - 61 62 - 65 66 - 71 72 - 75 76 - 79 80 - 89 90 - 107 108 - 115 1. b 118 - 129 130 - 135 7 Tempelhof is defined by an overwhelming sense of absence; devoid of buildings, trees and topography. The expansive 386 hectare site sits in the midst of three of the densest boroughs in Berlin, an impassive vacuum larger than both Tiergarten and Central Park, yet bearing none of the traits of a traditional urban park. The horizontal vistas are virtually uninterrupted for miles, punctuated by the occasional kite hovering in the skyline. The geometry of the space is delineated by mud-paths and runways. Once destined for machines, these lines are now subverted for human play. On a summer’s day the place is filled with barbecue smoke and cyclists hurtling down the runway. Ernst Sagebiel’s terminal remains unchallenged: a brash, sweeping quadrant fenced off from the rest of the park, severe yet strangely serene in its juxtaposition to the vastness and flatness of the site. Today there are no barbecues or rollerbladers. It is -11 degrees and I have chal- lenged myself to walk along the perimeter of Tempelhofer Feld. The sky is deeply oppressive and Tempelhof lies under a thick blanket of snow. It is a Tuesday afternoon in late January and the place feels deserted. I have decided to confine my walk to the boundaries of the former airfield, starting on the south east tip of the Park at the junction of Oderstrasse and Warthestrasse. A continuous interlocking fence precisely defines the fringes of Tempelhofer Feld. The southern and less frequented extremity of the park extends alongside a se- quence of brown field sites running parallel to the ring-bahn. The sound of the traffic and S-bahn trains is slightly muffled by the snow. A middle-aged couple cross-ski past me. As I look towards the Terminal, I can just about make out the speckles in the sky as belonging to the kites of snowboarders gliding along the airstrip. To my left, there is an abrupt transition from the sequence of ex-industrial sites to a string of perfectly manicured allotments. I have now reached the south west tip of the airfield by Tempelhof S bahn station. The landscape beyond the fence is quite different. As I head north along the side of Tempelhofer Damm the scene to my left has changed, becoming a progression of identical single faceted apartment blocks - or Mietskaserne - in- terspersed by the occasional Spaetkauf. Advancing towards Platz der Luftbrücke, 8 the airport Terminal now reveals itself at full scale. A vast concrete apron sprawls across the base of the Terminal; this area is cordoned off so I veer back east. I am now walking into the wind surrounded by a dozen kite-snowboard- ers zigzagging across the runway. Everything is monotone. The snow is barely distinguishable from the sombre sky above. I have been in Tempel- hof for more than an hour and the bitter cold has become intolerable. I diverge onto a smaller path towards Columbiadamm. The edge borders the brick wall of a neighbouring mosque and is the only section of the air- field to have some trees. In summer people congregate here to shelter from the sun, but today I have come to shelter from the wind as I make my way back to the Neukölln entrance on Oderstrasse. 1. c 9 10 1. d 11 Tempelhofer Feld presents a very particular form of public space, as a Tempelhofer Feld presents a very particular form of public space, as a 386-hectare vacuum in the city of Berlin. Exploring the dynamics and 386-hectare vacuum in the city of Berlin. Exploring the dynamics and peculiarities that contribute to the experience and understanding of such peculiarities that contribute to the experience and understanding of such a unique space requires not only an exploration of Tempelhof ’s histori- a unique space requires not only an exploration of Tempelhof ’s histori- cal and architectural context, but an examination of the notion of ‘void’ cal and architectural context, but an examination of the notion of ‘void’ space in an urban setting. space in an urban setting. In the particular context of Berlin’s history, “even empty of objects, these In the particular context of Berlin’s history, “even empty of objects, these spaces retain an immense amount of content and weight.” spaces retain an immense amount of content and weight.”1 What is the value of respecting the emptiness of such sites? The concept of ‘void’ is related to theories of urban sociology, in partic- ular Henri Lefebvre’s approach to the production of space and the right The concept of ‘void’ is related to theories of urban sociology, in partic- to the city. Does framing Tempelhof within these paradigms suggest a ular Henri Lefebvre’s approach to the production of space and the right potential trajectory or future? to the city. Does framing Tempelhof within these paradigms suggest a potential trajectory or future? Can the success of Tempelhof ’s reclamation as public space translate to other contexts? Does the prolonged ambiguity of Tempelhof ’s status Can the success of Tempelhof ’s reclamation as public space translate to contribute to a sense of vacuum or, as Tempelhof transcends into a more other contexts? Does the prolonged ambiguity of Tempelhof ’s status formalised public space, could the sense of liberation intrinsic to its cur- contribute to a sense of vacuum or, as Tempelhof transcends into a more rent state disappear? formalised public space, could the sense of liberation intrinsic to its cur- rent state disappear? 1 Christophe Girot, “Eulogy of the void. The lost power of Berlin landscapes after the wall”, Disp 156, (2004), p.39 12 13 2. a CHAPTER 1 The stages of Tempelhofer Feld History and continued discourse What significance does Tempelhof present in terms of Berlin’s wider narrative? Is it just another landscape scarred by ferment and destruc- tion? From meadow to airfield The great expanse of Tempelhof sits in a landscape defined by a virtual absence of topography: flatlands dubbed by postwar West German Chan- cellor, Konrad Adenauer, as the beginning of the Russian steppes.2 It was not a promising site, though representative of Berlin Brandenburg, a region characterized by its “vast inhospitaBle post- glacial floodplains with poor agricultural soil and desolate sand beds strewn with pine tree thickets”3. Today the former Brandenburg glacial plain is partly exploited for agricultural purposes and urban settlement, the remainder covered in dense pine forest, interspersed by some 3,000 lakes.4 2 Reinhard Mohr, “The myth of Berlin’s Tempelhof ”, Spiegel Online International <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-myth-of-berlin-s-tempelhof- the-mother-of-all-airports-a-549685.html > [ accessed on 07/08/2014] 3 Christophe Girot, “Eulogy of the void. The lost power of Berlin landscapes after the wall”, p. 35 4 Dorothy Elkins, TH Elkins and B Hofmeister, Berlin. The Spatial structure of a divided city, (New York: Methuen and Co, 1988), p. 89 16 It was here, on the southern edge of the medieval settlement that became Berlin that the sheep meadows belonging to the Knights Templar became known as Tempelhof. Nearer our time, in the late 19th century the former sheep meadow became a site for military exercises, serving as a parade ground for infantry and cavalry units. In due course the field became a testing ground for military and civilian aviation. It was the inevitaBle lo- cation for early flight demonstrations by both the French aviation pioneer Armand Zipfel and the American Orville Wright in 1909. 5 The former meadow was also a popular destination for workers from the rapidly industrializing city in search of space and sunlight, escaping for a Sunday outing from their crowded courtyard dwellings. The first public debates regarding the use of the field date back to the 1870’s, with 2. b 29th August 1909 First Zeppelin landing at Tempelhofer Feld before the eyes of 300,000 spectators. 2. c Football game between Viktoria and Germania teams, 1895, Tempelhofer Feld. 5 Reinhard Mohr, “The myth of Berlin’s Tempelhof ”, Spiegel Online International <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/the-myth-of-berlin-s-tempelhof- the-mother-of-all-airports-a-549685.html > [ accessed on 07/08/2014] 17 the Prussian military seeking to estaBlish Tempelhofer Feld as a lufts- chiffhafen or aviation centre for zeppelin and airship prototypes, while others favored surrendering the site to the needs of the expanding and overcrowded city, either for housing or as a dedicated recreation space6: alternative visions which continue to provide a source of contention to the present day.
Recommended publications
  • THE DAILY DIARY of PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER DATE ~Mo
    THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER DATE ~Mo.. Day, k’r.) U.S. EMBASSY RESIDENCE JULY 15, 1978 BONN, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY THE DAY 6:00 a.m. SATURDAY WOKE From 1 To R The President received a wake up call from the White House signal board operator. The President had breakfast with Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance. 7: 48 The President and the First Lady went to their motorcade. 7:48 8~4 The President and the First Lady motored from the U.S. Embassy residence to the Cologne/Bonn Airport. 828 8s The President and the First Lady flew by Air Force One from the Cologne/Bonn Airport to Rhein-Main Air Base, Frankfurt, Germany. For a list of passengers, see 3PENDIX "A." 8:32 8: 37 The President talked with Representative of the U.S. to the United Nations Andrew J. Young. Air Force One arrived at Rhein-Main Air Base. The President and the First Lady were greeted by: Helmut Schmidt, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) Mrs. Helmut Schmidt Holger Borner, Minister-President, Hesse Mrs. Holger Borner Hans-Dietrich Genscher, Minister of Foreign Affairs, FRG Hans Apel, Minister of Defense, FRG Wolfgang J, Lehmann, Consul General, FRG Mrs. Wolfgang J. Lehmann Gen. William J. Evans, Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Air Force, Europe Col. Robert D. Springer, Wing Commander, Rhein-Main Air Base Gen. Gethard Limberg, Chief of the German Air Force 8:45 g:oo The President and Chancellor Schmidt participated in a tour of static display of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • He Big “Mitte-Struggle” Politics and Aesthetics of Berlin's Post
    Martin Gegner he big “mitt e-struggl e” politics and a esth etics of t b rlin’s post-r nification e eu urbanism proj ects Abstract There is hardly a metropolis found in Europe or elsewhere where the 104 urban structure and architectural face changed as often, or dramatically, as in 20 th century Berlin. During this century, the city served as the state capital for five different political systems, suffered partial destruction pós- during World War II, and experienced physical separation by the Berlin wall for 28 years. Shortly after the reunification of Germany in 1989, Berlin was designated the capital of the unified country. This triggered massive building activity for federal ministries and other governmental facilities, the majority of which was carried out in the old city center (Mitte) . It was here that previous regimes of various ideologies had built their major architectural state representations; from to the authoritarian Empire (1871-1918) to authoritarian socialism in the German Democratic Republic (1949-89). All of these époques still have remains concentrated in the Mitte district, but it is not only with governmental buildings that Berlin and its Mitte transformed drastically in the last 20 years; there were also cultural, commercial, and industrial projects and, of course, apartment buildings which were designed and completed. With all of these reasons for construction, the question arose of what to do with the old buildings and how to build the new. From 1991 onwards, the Berlin urbanism authority worked out guidelines which set aesthetic guidelines for all construction activity. The 1999 Planwerk Innenstadt (City Center Master Plan) itself was based on a Leitbild (overall concept) from the 1980s called “Critical Reconstruction of a European City.” Many critics, architects, and theorists called it a prohibitive construction doctrine that, to a certain extent, represented conservative or even reactionary political tendencies in unified Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • African Swine Fever in Germany
    African swine fever in Germany Update on ASF situation in Brandenburg and Saxony PAFF-committee in November 2020 ASF in wild boar in Brandenburg As of November 17th 2020 → since first confirmation of ASF in September 153 positive ASF cases in wild boar have been confirmed in the eastern part of Brandenburg → On October 30th 2020 postitive carcasses have been found outside the first core area but within the infected area off the first site (districts Oder-Spree and Spree-Neisse) → Third core area was established (230 km²) → White zone around it is beeing established with wire fencing closing the gap to the already existing wire fence → Infected areas submitted as Part II areas (1649 km²) ASF in wild boar in Brandenburg Infected areas and buffer zone As of November 17th 2020 Submitted as: Part I – green Part II –light blue Seite 3 Core areas and white zones Within infected areas of Brandenburg Bleyen Neuzelle/ Sembten Core areas and white zones in Brandenburg Bleyen Friedland and Neuzelle/Sembten Epidemiological results in Brandenburg Presumably seperate disease spot in Bleyen Presumably introduction via migrating wild boar crossing the river/border in Bleyen Human introduction in Neuzelle/Sembten cannot be excluded Spread by vehicles neglectable Interviewing of residents and hunters helpfull Surveillance ASF in wild boar in Brandenburg September 10st – November 17th 2020 ASF in wild boar in Saxony As of November 17th 2020 → On October 31st 2020 one healthy shot wild boar was confirmed positive of ASF in Saxony, district of Görlitz 170 m
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Do in Berlin – a List of Options 19Th of June (Wednesday
    Things to do in Berlin – A List of Options Dear all, in preparation for the International Staff Week, we have composed an extensive list of activities or excursions you could participate in during your stay in Berlin. We hope we have managed to include something for the likes of everyone, however if you are not particularly interested in any of the things listed there are tons of other options out there. We recommend having a look at the following websites for further suggestions: https://www.berlin.de/en/ https://www.top10berlin.de/en We hope you will have a wonderful stay in Berlin. Kind regards, ??? 19th of June (Wednesday) / Things you can always do: - Famous sights: Brandenburger Tor, Fernsehturm (Alexanderplatz), Schloss Charlottenburg, Reichstag, Potsdamer Platz, Schloss Sanssouci in Potsdam, East Side Gallery, Holocaust Memorial, Pfaueninsel, Topographie des Terrors - Free Berlin Tours: https://www.neweuropetours.eu/sandemans- tours/berlin/free-tour-of-berlin/ - City Tours via bus: https://city- sightseeing.com/en/3/berlin/45/hop-on-hop-off- berlin?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI_s2es 9Pe4AIVgc13Ch1BxwBCEAAYASAAEgInWvD_BwE - City Tours via bike: https://www.fahrradtouren-berlin.com/en/ - Espresso-Concerts: https://www.konzerthaus.de/en/espresso- concerts - Selection of famous Museums (Museumspass Berlin buys admission to the permanent exhibits of about 50 museums for three consecutive days. It costs €24 (concession €12) and is sold at tourist offices and participating museums.): Pergamonmuseum, Neues Museum,
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Colloque Chasse.Pdf
    FONDATION MUSÉE DE LA CHASSE ACTES DE COLLOQUE FRANÇOIS SOMMER ET DE LA NATURE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS RECONNUE D’UTILITÉ PUBLIQUE 62, RUE DES ARCHIVES DÉCRET DU 30-11-1966 75003 PARIS, FRANCE 19 & 20 MARS 2015 WWW.CHASSENATURE.ORG EXPOSER LA CHASSE ? EXHIBITING HUNTING? SYNTHÈSE DU COLLOQUE À travers le monde, de nombreux musées sont consacrés à la chasse. La nature de leurs collections comme leur agencement muséographique expriment différentes conceptions de la relation de l’homme à l’animal sauvage. Si leurs concepteurs poursuivent des fins artistiques, naturalistes ou ethnographiques, la perception du visiteur est influencée par sa sensibilité et le rapport qu’il entretient lui-même à la chasse. Alors que la chasse est aujourd’hui de moins en moins familière, il peut s’avérer nécessaire d’adapter l’agencement des collections ainsi que les dispositifs d’interprétation afin de pallier la méconnaissance du public. « Exposer la chasse ? » constitue l’un des aboutissements du projet initial de la division Culture du C.I.C. (conseil international de la chasse et de la conservation du gibier - présidée par Alexandre Poniatowski) de réactualiser l’Annuaire des musées de chasse dans le monde édité en 1975. Le colloque, organisé par la Fondation François Sommer pour la chasse et la nature en collaboration avec le C.I.C. est placé sous l’autorité d’un comité scientifique composé de Claude d’Anthenaise (directeur du musée de la Chasse et de la Nature), d’Yves Bergeron (professeur de muséologie et de patrimoine à l’Université du Québec à Montréal), de Sergio Dalla Bernardina (professeur d’ethnologie à l’Université de Bretagne occidentale), de Philippe Descola (anthropologue et professeur au Collège de France) et de Nélia Dias (professeur au département d’anthropologie de l’université de Lisbonne).
    [Show full text]
  • German History Reflected
    The Detlev Rohwedder Building German history reflected GFE = 1/2 Formathöhe The Detlev Rohwedder Building German history reflected Contents 3 Introduction 44 Reunification and Change 46 The euphoria of unity 4 The Reich Aviation Ministry 48 A tainted place 50 The Treuhandanstalt 6 Inception 53 The architecture of reunification 10 The nerve centre of power 56 In conversation with 14 Courage to resist: the Rote Kapelle Hans-Michael Meyer-Sebastian 18 Architecture under the Nazis 58 The Federal Ministry of Finance 22 The House of Ministries 60 A living place today 24 The changing face of a colossus 64 Experiencing and creating history 28 The government clashes with the people 66 How do you feel about working in this building? 32 Socialist aspirations meet social reality 69 A stroll along Wilhelmstrasse 34 Isolation and separation 36 Escape from the state 38 New paths and a dead-end 72 Chronicle of the Detlev Rohwedder Building 40 Architecture after the war – 77 Further reading a building is transformed 79 Imprint 42 In conversation with Jürgen Dröse 2 Contents Introduction The Detlev Rohwedder Building, home to Germany’s the House of Ministries, foreshadowing the country- Federal Ministry of Finance since 1999, bears wide uprising on 17 June. Eight years later, the Berlin witness to the upheavals of recent German history Wall began to cast its shadow just a few steps away. like almost no other structure. After reunification, the Treuhandanstalt, the body Constructed as the Reich Aviation Ministry, the charged with the GDR’s financial liquidation, moved vast site was the nerve centre of power under into the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Lusatia) and Its Role in Fe Fluxes, Precipitation and Coating of the River Bed
    EGU2020-4975 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-4975 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Mapping and quantifying groundwater inflow to the Spree River (Lusatia) and its role in Fe fluxes, precipitation and coating of the river bed. Benjamin Gilfedder1,2, Fabian Wismeth1, and Sven Frei2 1Limnologische Forschungsstation Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Deutschland 2Lehrstuhl für Hydrologie Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Deutschland The spatial distribution and temporal dynamics of groundwater inflow to rivers is often poorly defined but central to understanding water and matter fluxes. This is especially true for the Spree River which drains the Lusatia mining district, Brandenburg Germany. In the Spree catchment iron and sulphate fluxes to the river stem from the pyrite rich groundwater system, and the area’s history of open-pit lignite mining and re-flooding of many of these mines at the end of their lifetime. This iron flux threatens the river ecosystem, tourism in downstream communities (Spreewald) and the drinking water of Berlin. Iron is often observed as precipitates along the river bed, as well as colouring the river water yellow-brown, indicating the presence of iron (oxy)hydroxides such as ferrihydrite and goethite. In this work we have used radon as a natural groundwater tracer to delimited areas of active groundwater discharge to both the main Spree River and the Kleine Spree River to better understand the spatial destitution of groundwater input to the system. This was combined with mass-balance modelling to quantify the groundwater flux along the river using the FINIFLUX model.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Berlin Tiergarten Tunnel Verkehrsanlagen Im Zentralen
    Germany Berlin Tiergarten Tunnel Verkehrsanlagen im zentralen Bereich – VZB This report was compiled by the German OMEGA Team, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Please Note: This Project Profile has been prepared as part of the ongoing OMEGA Centre of Excellence work on Mega Urban Transport Projects. The information presented in the Profile is essentially a 'work in progress' and will be updated/amended as necessary as work proceeds. Readers are therefore advised to periodically check for any updates or revisions. The Centre and its collaborators/partners have obtained data from sources believed to be reliable and have made every reasonable effort to ensure its accuracy. However, the Centre and its collaborators/partners cannot assume responsibility for errors and omissions in the data nor in the documentation accompanying them. 2 CONTENTS A PROJECT INTRODUCTION Type of project Project name Description of mode type Technical specification Principal transport nodes Major associated developments Parent projects Country/location Current status B PROJECT BACKGROUND Principal project objectives Key enabling mechanisms Description of key enabling mechanisms Key enabling mechanisms timeline Main organisations involved Planning and environmental regime Outline of planning legislation Environmental statements Overview of public consultation Ecological mitigation Regeneration Ways of appraisal Complaints procedures Land acquisition C PRINCIPAL PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Detailed description of route Detailed description of main
    [Show full text]
  • Travel with the Metropolitan Museum of Art
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Travel with Met Classics The Met BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB May 9–15, 2022 Berlin with Christopher Noey Lecturer BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Berlin Dear Members and Friends of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Berlin pulses with creativity and imagination, standing at the forefront of Europe’s art world. Since the fall of the Wall, the German capital’s evolution has been remarkable. Industrial spaces now host an abundance of striking private art galleries, and the city’s landscapes have been redefined by cutting-edge architecture and thought-provoking monuments. I invite you to join me in May 2022 for a five-day, behind-the-scenes immersion into the best Berlin has to offer, from its historic museum collections and lavish Prussian palaces to its elegant opera houses and electrifying contemporary art scene. We will begin with an exploration of the city’s Cold War past, and lunch atop the famous Reichstag. On Museum Island, we
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 6 N.Roseau, L'espace Aér
    (! ?»8FC4684uE<8A8G?8F9BE@8F 6BAG8@CBE4<A8F78?4I<??8 A4G;4?<8EBF84H Au début du vingtième siècle, deux nouveaux instruments de déplacement font leur apparition, l’automobile et l’avion. Même si l’avion est réservé aux pionniers de l’air, nombreux sont ceux qui considèrent que cette inven- tion peut révolutionner la mobilité et la perception de l’espace. Les espoirs qui accompagnent sa naissance témoignent d’une grande con!ance dans l’avenir. Des perspectives sont alors ouvertes aux urbanistes, qui vont capter les attributs aériens : la conquête de l’espace aérien et la colonisation des hauteurs, la fascination pour l’instantanéité du déplacement, le désir de pureté et de détachement. Peu à peu, la thématique aérienne fait une entrée remarquée dans l’imaginaire urbain. Les images produites révèlent souvent l’absence relative d’une infrastructure médiatrice entre l’avion et la ville. Dé!ant la pesanteur et les hauteurs, compri- mant un peu plus l’espace-temps, l’avion semble pouvoir s’en affranchir et arriver directement en ville. Il ne nécessite pas de réseau physique spéci!que, et l’objet est suf!samment compact pour que certains visionnaires puissent l’imaginer se poser n’importe où. La notion d’aéroport n’apparaît d’ailleurs qu’à la !n des années 20, n’empêchant pas la poursuite des ré"exions sur 82 ?¹8FC4684uE<8A8G?8F9BE@8F6BAG8@CBE4<A8F78?4I<??8 l’accueil de l’avion en ville, comme l’atteste par exemple, le projet d’Aéroparis proposé en 1932 par André Lurçat sur l’Ile aux Cygnes1.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Berlin Walking Disabilities Or Visual Impairments
    Accessible Berlin accessible.visitBerlin.com © Dagmar Schwelle © Dagmar 2 3 Out and About in Berlin Information in Berlin Berlin’s system of buses, U-Bahn (subway) Hauptbahnhof (Central Station) and S-Bahn (city railway) provide accessible HauptbahnhofEntrance Europaplatz, mobility around the city. BVG (Berlin public ground floor, daily 8am–10pm transport services) buses all offer step-free + access, with space for wheelchairs, wheeled + Hauptbahnhof © Weiland/Gesellschaftsbilder.de Andi walkers, prams and buggies. BVG personnel Travel for All are happy to assist you into the buses and Tegel Airport (TXL) trains. Terminal A, Gate 1 Accessibility in Berlin BVG.de/en daily 8am–9pm TXL, X9, 109, 128 Welcome to Berlin! Discover a city with a character all its own – tolerant, Unique in Europe: The VBB (Verkehrsver- bund Berlin-Brandenburg) transport associ- ZOB-Zentraler Omnibusbahnhof Berlin open and hospitable. Berlin is a vibrant destination accessible for all ation offers an assistance service. If required, (Central Coach Station Berlin) visitors. As early as 2013, Berlin was honoured by the European Com- an accompanying person is provided for passengers on BVG buses and trains or the Masurenallee 4–6 mission’s Access City award for disabled-friendly cities. Public transport daily 8am–8pm in particular and the many accessible new buildings meet the needs of S-Bahn (city railway). The service is available for people who use wheelchairs just as much Kaiserdamm people with activity limitations. as the elderly, those travelling with prams or Messe Nord/ICC buggies, and people with limited mobility, visitBerlin is committed to an accessible Berlin walking disabilities or visual impairments.
    [Show full text]
  • Spree Riverbanks for Everyone! What Remains of “Sink Mediaspree”?1
    Spree Riverbanks for Everyone! What Remains of “Sink Mediaspree”?1 Jan Dohnke In recent years, the protests against the large-scale investment project “Media- spree” in Kreuzberg-Friedrichshain have repoliticized the public debate on ur- ban development more than any other event in Berlin. In the context of urban development that is increasingly dominated by neoliberal concepts in the wake of German reunification, the “Sink Mediaspree” initiative has been especially effective in putting fundamental questions about the sense and purpose of the urban development in Berlin back on the agenda. In a manner that drew the wider public’s attention, this movement also succeeded in challenging “entre- preneurial urban policy” in general. In fact, the planning decisions that have provoked citizens’ protest since 2006 contained many elements that seam- lessly fit into Berlin’s neoliberal restructuring. The commitment to large-scale, investor-friendly projects at the expense of local organisational structures and needs in order to create locational advantages for the city in the international competition to attract investors; advancing privatisation and commercialisation to the disadvantage of the broader public good; and, overall, the increasingly one-dimensional orientation of planning and land utilisation toward economic targets. In the light of the state of Berlin’s difficult financial situation, development is largely expected to come from the private sector, whose investments facili- tate construction projects and, on this basis, are supposed to create new jobs. Apart from marketing strategies, Berlin (like many other cities) also draws on particular incentive strategies, e.g. the affordable provision of infrastructure, public subsidies, tax concessions, and a form of planning that privileges major investors by means of its large-scale and dense nature.
    [Show full text]