A Régi Belső-Ázsia Története

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Régi Belső-Ázsia Története A régi Belső-Ázsia története Vásáry, István, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem BTK, Török Tanszék Szerkesztette Bende, IldikóZimonyi István, sorozatszerkesztő Created by XMLmind XSL-FO Converter. A régi Belső-Ázsia története írta Vásáry, István és Bende, Ildikó Készült az Oktatási Minisztérium támogatásával a Felsőoktatási Pályázatok Irodája által lebonyolított Felsőoktatási Tankönyv- és Szakkönyv-támogatási Pályázat keretében. Szerzői jog © 2003 Vásáry István, Draskovits Zsuzsa, Balassi Kiadó E könyv kutatási és oktatási célokra szabadon használható. Bármilyen formában való sokszorosítása a jogtulajdonosok írásos engedélyéhez kötött. Created by XMLmind XSL-FO Converter. Tartalom Előszó az új kiadáshoz ....................................................................................................................... iv Előszó ................................................................................................................................................. v 1. BEVEZETÉS .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. 1. Belső-Ázsia fogalma ......................................................................................................... 1 2. 2. Belső-Ázsia természeti földrajza ....................................................................................... 2 3. 3. Belső-Ázsia és a nomadizmus ........................................................................................... 3 4. 4. Belső-Ázsia történetének korszakai .................................................................................. 6 5. 5. Belső-Ázsia történetének forrásai ..................................................................................... 7 2. Belső-Ázsia a türk kor előtt .......................................................................................................... 10 1. 1. Kimmerek, szkíták, szarmaták ........................................................................................ 10 2. 2. A szkíták utóélete ............................................................................................................ 12 3. 3. Hiungnuk ......................................................................................................................... 13 4. 4. A jüecsi népvándorlás ..................................................................................................... 15 5. 5. A hiungnu hatalom hanyatlása ........................................................................................ 18 6. 6. Szienpik és topák ............................................................................................................. 19 7. 7. A zsuanzsuanok birodalma .............................................................................................. 21 8. 8. Újabb nomád hullámok az iráni világban: hjónok és heftaliták ...................................... 23 9. 9. A hunok Európában ......................................................................................................... 25 10. 10. A hunok utóélete ......................................................................................................... 29 3. Belső-Ázsia török korszaka .......................................................................................................... 31 1. 1. A türkök felemelkedése és első birodalma ...................................................................... 31 2. 2. Türk–bizánci kapcsolatok és az avar-kérdés ................................................................... 34 3. 3. Az Elsőtől a Második Türk Kaganátusig ........................................................................ 37 4. 4. A Második Türk Birodalom ............................................................................................ 40 5. 5. Ujgur hegemónia ............................................................................................................. 43 6. 6. A kirgiz epizód ................................................................................................................ 47 7. 7. Kanszui ujgurok .............................................................................................................. 48 8. 8. Turkesztáni ujgurok ........................................................................................................ 50 9. 9. Kitajok és dzsürcsik ........................................................................................................ 52 10. 10. Tibetiek és tangutok .................................................................................................... 55 4. Az iszlám térhódítása Belső-Ázsiában ......................................................................................... 58 1. 1. Az első muszlim török dinasztia: a Karahanidák ............................................................ 58 2. 2. Oguzok és szeldzsukok ................................................................................................... 61 3. 3. Karakitajok ...................................................................................................................... 65 4. 4. Hvárezm .......................................................................................................................... 68 5. Belső-Ázsia nyugati nyúlványa: a kelet-európai steppevidék ...................................................... 71 1. 1. Onogurok és bolgárok ..................................................................................................... 71 2. 2. Volgai Bulgária ............................................................................................................... 74 3. 3. Avarok ............................................................................................................................. 76 4. 4. A Kazár Birodalom ......................................................................................................... 78 5. 5. Magyarok ........................................................................................................................ 81 6. 6. Besenyők és úzok ............................................................................................................ 86 7. 7. Kunok .............................................................................................................................. 88 6. Utószó helyett ............................................................................................................................... 91 7. Rövidítések ................................................................................................................................... 92 8. Időrendi táblázat ........................................................................................................................... 94 9. TÉRKÉPEK .................................................................................................................................. 99 10. Mutató ...................................................................................................................................... 103 iii Created by XMLmind XSL-FO Converter. Előszó az új kiadáshoz {7} 1993-ban jelent meg Szegeden A régi Belső-Ázsia története című könyvem a Magyar Őstörténeti Könyvtár 7. köteteként. Azóta sok víz lefolyt a Dunán, s a kis példányszámban megjelent könyv hamar elfogyott, a munka mára gyakorlatilag megszerezhetetlen lett. Mivel egyetemi hallgatók és kutatók részéről egyaránt igény mutatkozott könyvem iránt, örömmel vettem a sorozat egykori és jelenlegi szerkesztőjének, Zimonyi Istvánnak a mű új kiadása iránti kérését. A könyv megjelenése óta azonban tíz év telt el, a könyv kéziratát pedig lényegében 1989-ben lezártam, így értelmetlen lett volna, hogy a könyv szövegét teljesen változatlan formában nyomják újra. Bár a könyv lényegén és koncepcióján nem változtattam (közismerten ugyanazt a témát ugyanaz a szerző nem tudja kétszer, teljesen eltérően feldolgozni), de igen sok apróbb-nagyobb szövegbeli változtatást hajtottam végre, legjobb meggyőződésem szerint jobbítván a szöveget. Elsősorban pedig a bibliográfiai kiegészítés vált elkerülhetetlenné. Az elmúlt évtizedben a könyv témája iránti érdeklődés világszerte hihetetlenül megnőtt, és ez a témával foglalkozó szakirodalom ugrásszerű növekedését eredményezte. A jelenség okát elsősorban abban kereshetjük, hogy a Szovjetunió 1991 decemberében felbomlott, és a Kaukázusban három, Közép-Ázsiában pedig öt új független állam jött létre, melyek területei nagyrészt a történeti Belső-Ázsia alkotórészei voltak. Elsősorban a „globalizáció” nyelvén, az angolon írt szakirodalom szaporodott el, a térségre vetülő szuperhatalmi érdeklődésnek nyilvánvaló és leplezetlen jeleként. Egy évtized távlatából nézve, a terjedelmes, újabb szakirodalom áttekintése után is úgy látom, hogy könyvem újra megjelentetése nem fölösleges. S itt nemcsak arra a tényre gondolok, hogy máig ez az egyetlen összefoglalás magyar nyelven a mongol kor előtti Belső-Ázsia történetéről. Sokkal inkább egy másik szempont indokolja a könyv újra kiadását. Az eddig megjelent számos kiváló új monográfia és résztanulmány ellenére nagyon kevesen kísérelték meg a mongol kor előtti Belső-Ázsiát olvasmányos, áttekinthető, összefüggő történeti elbeszélés keretében ismertetni. Olyan elbeszélésben, amelyet a keleti nyelvekkel és kultúrákkal közelebbi ismeretségben nem levő történészek, egyetemi hallgatók és olvasók egyaránt haszonnal forgathatnak. Magyarán szólva mindig az érthető szintézisre fektettem a fő hangsúlyt, mely egy
Recommended publications
  • 4 Vol. 2 2020
    ISSN 2664-5157 (print) ISSN 2708-7360 (online) №4 Turkic Studies Vol. 2 Journal 2020 Nur-Sultan ISSN (print)2664-5157 ISSN (online)2708-7360 Turkic Studies Journal 2020, Volume 2, Number 4 2019 жылдан бастап шығады Founded in 2019 Издается с 2019 года Жылына 4 рет шығады Published 4 times a year Выходит 4 раза в год Нұр-Сұлтан, 2020 Nur-Sultan, 2020 Нур-Султан, 2020 ISSN 2664-5157. Turkic Studies Journal, 2020, Volume 2, Number 4 1 Бас редакторы: Ерлан Сыдықов, т.ғ.д., проф., ҚР ҰҒА академигі, Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті (Нұр-Сұлтан, Қазақстан) Бас редактордың орынбасары Шакимашрип Ибраев, ф.ғ.д., проф., Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті (Нұр-Сұлтан, Қазақстан) Бас редактордың орынбасары Ирина Невская, доктор, проф., Гете университеті (Франкфурт, Германия) Редакция алқасы Ғайбулла Бабаяров т.ғ.д., Өзбекстан ғылым академиясы Ұлттық археология орталығы (Ташкент, Өзбекстан) Ұлданай Бахтикиреева ф.ғ.д., проф., Ресей халықтар достастығы университеті (Мәскеу, Ресей Федерациясы) Дмитрий Васильев т.ғ.д., проф., Ресей ғылым академиясының Шығыстану институты (Мәскеу, Ресей Федерациясы) Гюрер Гульсевин доктор, проф., Эгей университеті (Измир, Түркия) Анна Дыбо ф.ғ.д., проф., Ресей ғылым академиясының Тіл білімі институты (Мәскеу, Ресей Федерациясы) Мырзатай Жолдасбеков ф.ғ.д., проф., Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті (Нұр-Сұлтан, Қазақстан) Дания Загидуллина ф.ғ.д., проф., Татарстан Республикасы ғылым академиясы (Қазан, Ресей Федерациясы) Зимони Иштван доктор, проф., Сегед университеті (Сегед, Венгрия). Болат Көмеков т.ғ.д., проф., Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті (Нұр-Сұлтан, Қазақстан) Игорь Кызласов т.ғ.д., проф., Ресей ғылым академиясы Археология институты (Мәскеу, Ресей Федерациясы) Дихан Қамзабекұлы ф.ғ.д., проф., Л.Н.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eurasian Transformation of the 10Th to 13Th Centuries: the View from Song China, 906-1279
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications History 2004 The Eurasian Transformation of the 10th to 13th centuries: The View from Song China, 906-1279 Paul Jakov Smith Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/history_facpubs Repository Citation Smith, Paul Jakov. “The Eurasian Transformation of the 10th to 13th centuries: The View from the Song.” In Johann Arneson and Bjorn Wittrock, eds., “Eurasian transformations, tenth to thirteenth centuries: Crystallizations, divergences, renaissances,” a special edition of the journal Medieval Encounters (December 2004). This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Medieval 10,1-3_f12_279-308 11/4/04 2:47 PM Page 279 EURASIAN TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE TENTH TO THIRTEENTH CENTURIES: THE VIEW FROM SONG CHINA, 960-1279 PAUL JAKOV SMITH ABSTRACT This essay addresses the nature of the medieval transformation of Eurasia from the perspective of China during the Song dynasty (960-1279). Out of the many facets of the wholesale metamorphosis of Chinese society that characterized this era, I focus on the development of an increasingly bureaucratic and autocratic state, the emergence of a semi-autonomous local elite, and the impact on both trends of the rise of the great steppe empires that encircled and, under the Mongols ultimately extinguished the Song. The rapid evolution of Inner Asian state formation in the tenth through the thirteenth centuries not only swayed the development of the Chinese state, by putting questions of war and peace at the forefront of the court’s attention; it also influenced the evolution of China’s socio-political elite, by shap- ing the context within which elite families forged their sense of coorporate identity and calibrated their commitment to the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Formation Models and Semantic Features of Derived Words in Orhon Inscriptions (Derivations of Nouns and Adjectives)
    TRAMES, 2015, 19(69/64), 2, 171–188 WORD FORMATION MODELS AND SEMANTIC FEATURES OF DERIVED WORDS IN ORHON INSCRIPTIONS (DERIVATIONS OF NOUNS AND ADJECTIVES). A. K. Kupayeva L. N. Gumilyev Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan Abstract. In modern Turkological studies, the scientific interest in word formation arises not only from the need to study the ways of forming new words and enriching the vocabulary stock. The interest also comes from the fact that the word-formation process is often closely connected with grammatical structures and linguistic phenomena, which leads to new word formation. This work is devoted to studying the problems connected with word formation set in the language of Orhon Old Turkic inscriptions that recorded the language. These inscriptions are valuable written data about all aspects of studies of Turkology such as linguistics, history, culture etc. Furthermore, this paper considers suf- fixation and compounding as the main productive ways of word formation of language of Orhon inscriptions and gives semantic interpretation of noun and adjective derivatives. The author offers word-formation, morphemic and etymological analysis of structure of words, grouped according to word formation models. At the same time, data is given about modern Turkic languages, revealing unique features of word formation in the language of Orhon inscriptions. This data describes the phonological and semantic changes in word forming morphemes. Key words: Orhon Inscriptions, word formation models, semantic analysis, suffixation, compounding, word formation meaning DOI: 10.3176/tr.2015.2.05 1. Introduction Recently, the language of one of the oldest Turkic written records, dating back to the 7th–9th centuries, the Orhon Old Turkic, has been studied from different aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongols, Turks, and Others Brill’S Inner Asian Library
    MONGOLS, TURKS, AND OTHERS BRILL’S INNER ASIAN LIBRARY edited by NICOLA DI COSMO DEVIN DEWEESE CAROLINE HUMPHREY VOLUME 11 MONGOLS, TURKS, AND OTHERS Eurasian Nomads and the Sedentary World EDITED BY REUVEN AMITAI AND MICHAL BIRAN BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2005 On the cover: Mongol horsemen in combat, from RashÊd al-DÊn’s J§mi" al-taw§rÊkh, MS Supp. Persan 1113, fol. 231v. © Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mongols, Turks, and others : Eurasian nomads and the sedentary world / edited by Reuven Amitai and Michal Biran. p. cm. — (Brill’s Inner Asian library ; vol. 11) Includes bibliographical references and index ISBN 90-04-14096-4 1. Mongols—History. 2. Turkic peoples—History. 3. Eurasia—History. I. Title : Eurasian nomads and the sedentary world. II. Amitai, Reuven. III. Biran, Michal. IV. Series. DS19.M648 2004 950’.04942—dc22 2004054503 ISSN 1566-7162 ISBN 90 04 14096 4 © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Gokturk History
    HUMANITIES INSTITUTE Richard Dietrich, Ph.D. GOKTURK HISTORY Contents Political History (Government – Military) Social History (Class – Gender Relations) Economic History (Innovations – Trade) Cultural History (Religion – Art – Literature) GOVERNMENT Political Structure The Gök Türks Although many details about the internal structure and titles of the Türk state remain unclear, contemporary Chinese sources and the Orkhon inscriptions from the Second Türk Empire do provide a general picture of how the state was ruled. Within its territo ry the Gök Türk state was a union (or confederation) of ethnically related tribes and tribal groups that were hierarchically grouped. The tribes and tribal groups were culturally linked by common beliefs, legal practices and commonly accepted genealogies. Politically, their tribal structure (bodun) and their unified political and military structure (el) was under the under the control of the kaghan (also khan). At the center of the empire were twelve main Gök Türk tribes, the most important of which was the Ashina; the kaghan was always a member of this tribe. Next in order of precedence were the Tokuz Oghuz, who were numerically superior to the Gök Türk, but less united until the early 7th century. At that point the Uighurs, a tribal grouping of ten tribes led ty the Yaghlakar tribe, were able to unite the Tokuz Oghuz under them. In addition to the Tokuz Oghuz, the Basmil and Karluk were two other important tribal groups in the Gök Türk Empire. Every tribal group was led by an elteber, and below him each tribe was headed by an irkin, officials whose titles frequently appear in the Orkhon inscriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • INAS 019 02 02-Lee and Kuang.Indd
    INNER ASIA �9 (�0�7) �97–�39 Inner ASIA brill.com/inas A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Historical Sources and Y-DNA Studies with Regard to the Early and Medieval Turkic Peoples Joo-Yup Lee University of Toronto [email protected] Shuntu Kuang University of Toronto [email protected] Abstract In the past 10 years, geneticists have investigated the genetic variation of modern Turkic populations as well as ancient DNA of the Xiongnu and others. The accumu- lated findings of these surveys, however, have not been adequately noted by specialists in Inner Asian history. In order to fill this gap, we conducted a comparative analy- sis of textual information and genetic survey data on the early and medieval Turkic peoples. First, we examined the information on the origins, identity, and physiognomy of the early and medieval Turkic peoples contained in the Chinese Standard Histories (zhengshi 正史). We then discussed how the findings of genetic surveys complement the textual information. Both Chinese histories and modern DNA studies indicate that the early and medieval Turkic peoples were made up of heterogeneous popula- tions. The Turkicisation of central and western Eurasia was not the product of migra- tions involving a homogeneous entity, but that of language diffusion. Keywords Turkic peoples – Chinese Standard Histories – Y-DNA haplogroup – Turkicization – physiognomy © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/���050�8-��340089Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 08:24:26PM via free access 198 Lee and Kuang Introduction In the past 10–15 years, geneticists have traced the genetic origins of various human populations by studying their paternally inherited Y-chromosomes and maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA.1 In the process, geneticists have also investigated the genetic variation of modern Inner Asian populations (Wells et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on the Turkicisation of the Mongols in Post-Mongol Central Asia and the Qipchaq Steppe
    Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 71 (2), 121 – 144 (2018) DOI: 10.1556/062.2018.71.2.1 SOME REMARKS ON THE TURKICISATION OF THE MONGOLS IN POST-MONGOL CENTRAL ASIA AND THE QIPCHAQ STEPPE JOO-YUP LEE Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies Marston Road, Oxford, OX3 0EE, U.K. e-mail: [email protected] The Turkic nomads of the Mongol successor states in Central Asia and the Qipchaq Steppe arose from the merging of various Turkic groups and the Mongols. The former had consisted of hetero- geneous elements that did not coalesce into a single entity sharing a common identity and historical consciousness. They thus did not constitute a uniform majority in relation to the more cohesive Mongols. In terms of tribal and genetic compositions, the Turkic nomads of the Mongol successor states were closer to the Mongols than to the pre-Mongol Turkic groups. Naturally, they held on to a predominantly Mongol orientation rather than reverting to pre-Mongol identities. Key words: Turkic nomads, Mongol Empire, Mongol descendants, Turkicisation, Mongolness, Y-DNA haplogroup, Central Asia, Qipchaq Steppe. Introduction By the late 14th century, the Mongol descendants in Central Asia and the Qipchaq Steppe, including the members of the Chinggisid dynasty and such tribes of Mongol origin as the Barlas, Manghit, and Qunghrat, had become speakers of Turkic lan- guages. Historians accordingly remark that these Mongol descendants were “Turki- cised” and refer to them as “Turks” or “Turkicised Mongols”.1 However, we hear of no Turkic amīrs or tribal leaders of the Mongol successor states2 in Central Asia and 1 For instance, Peter Golden (2011, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortem Et Gloriam Army Lists Use the Army Lists to Create Your Own Customised Armies Using the Mortem Et Gloriam Army Builder
    Army Lists Ghenghis Contents Khitan-Liao v02 907 to 1125 CE Khwarazmian 1186 to 1246 CE Goryeo Korean 918 to 1399 CE Mongol Conquest 1207 to 1259 CE Later Zhou and Early Northern Song v02 951 to 1005 CE Golden Horde 1251 to 1502 CE Later Northern Song v02 1006 to 1127 CE Ilkhanate 1256 to 1357 CE Xi Xia 1038 to 1227 CE Chagatai Khanate 1259 to 1370 CE Pre-Conquest Mongol 1100 to 1206 CE Yuan Dynasty 1260 to 1368 CE Ghurid 1100 to 1222 CE Later Nomadic Mongol 1264 to 1508 CE Jin 1113 to 1234 CE Ming Chinese 1356 to 1500 CE Qara Khitan 1124 to 1211 CE Joseon Korean 1400 to 1500 CE Southern Song 1127 to 1279 CE Version 2020.02: 1st January 2020 © Simon Hall Creating an army with the Mortem et Gloriam Army Lists Use the army lists to create your own customised armies using the Mortem et Gloriam Army Builder. There are few general rules to follow: 1. An army must have at least 2 generals and can have no more than 4. 2. You must take at least the minimum of any troops noted and may not go beyond the maximum of any. 3. No army may have more than two generals who are Talented or better. 4. Unless specified otherwise, all elements in a UG must be classified identically. Unless specified otherwise, if an optional characteristic is taken, it must be taken by all the elements in the UG for which that optional characteristic is available. 5. Any UGs can be downgraded by one quality grade and/or by one shooting skill representing less strong, tired or understrength troops.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 the Türk Empire
    ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 THE TÜRK EMPIRE 14 THE TÜRK EMPIRE* D. Sinor and S. G. Klyashtorny Contents THE FIRST TÜRK EMPIRE (553–682) ........................ 327 Ethnogenesis ...................................... 327 The economy ...................................... 331 Political history ..................................... 332 THE SECOND TÜRK EMPIRE (682–745) ...................... 335 Resurgence of the Türk Empire ............................. 335 Political and social structure .............................. 336 Relations with China .................................. 338 The empire in crisis ................................... 339 The last war with T’ang China ............................. 340 The final decade ..................................... 341 Epigraphic memorials of the Türks ........................... 342 The Türgesh state .................................... 346 The Uighurs and the Karluks .............................. 347 * See Map 7. 326 ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 Ethnogenesis Part One THE FIRST TÜRK EMPIRE (553–682) (D. Sinor) The two centuries during which the Türks were the dominant power in Inner Asia would seem to mark a turning point since, for the first time in recorded history, an essentially nomad empire bordered simultaneously on three major sedentary civilizations: those of China, Iran, and the Western world as represented by Byzantium. A more or less permanent link was established between these three civilizations, allowing the free flow of trade and with it, one must presume, a range of ideas and information. There
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2776-1010 Volume 2, Issue 7, July, 2021 ANALYSIS of LEXICAL
    ISSN: 2776-1010 Volume 2, Issue 7, July, 2021 ANALYSIS OF LEXICAL UNITS EXPRESSING SPIRITUAL VALUES IN ANCIENT WRITTEN MONUMENTS Allambergenova Muqaddas Ruslanovna Karakalpak State University ABSTRACT In this article elemenating of ancient inscription stones sipiritual customes and traditions, loyalty to duty, realizing the nationalism and talking about necessary quality in managing the state by basing on texts of writing ancient monuments. In this days youth have high sipiritual immunity and publicity works that are carried out to educate them are compared with ancient inscription. Keywords: Bilghahakhan, Kultikhin, Tonyukhuk, nationalism, sacred duty, patriotism, trophy, calamity. Introduction Every nation has its own spiritual treasures that are precious to it. These are masterpieces that have been passed down from generation to generation for centuries and have not lost their significance and value today, and have become a source of pride for this nation. For example, just as the Kyrgyz people are proud of the Manas epic, the ancient Egyptians are proud of the Pyramids, the French are proud of the Louvre in Paris, so we should be proud of our national spiritual wealth. Along with the unique historical heritage, art and literature of nations and peoples, their customs and rituals, cultural attitudes and moral qualities are also included in the system of spiritual values. They play an important role in preserving the identity of the people, in educating the younger generation, in the socialization of the individual. National spiritual values reflect the worldview and attitude of the people to life, their inner nature and way of life. They reflect the spiritual world and way of thinking, dreams and ideals, conscience and honor of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Baku Engineering University ISSN 2521-6333 PHILOLOGY and Volume 1 Number 1 PEDAGOGY Journal Is Published Twice a Year Number - 1
    Journal of Baku Engineering University ISSN 2521-6333 PHILOLOGY and Volume 1 Number 1 PEDAGOGY Journal is published twice a year Number - 1. June, Number - 2. December 2017 A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l http://journal.beu.edu.az Founder Havar Mammadov Editor-in-chief Niftali Qodjayev Co - Editors Islam Huseynov Jamil Mammadov Editorial board Ajdar Agayev (Azerbaijan, Baku Engineering University) M.Bahaddin Acat (Turkey, Osmangazi University) Aida Qasimova (Azerbaijan, Baku State University) Minaxanım Təkləli (Azerbaijan, Baku Engineering University) Akif Huseynli (Azerbaijan, Baku Engineering University) Seyran Gayibov (Azerbaijan, Baku Engineering University) Kenan Beshirov (Azerbaijan, Baku Engineering University) Tarana Haciyeva (Azerbaijan,Baku Engineering University) International Advisory board Abdul Aziz Abdul Hafis El Khouli (Egupt, Cairo University) Nazim Hikmet Polat (Turkey, Gazi University) Dogan Kaya (Turkey, Cumhuriyet University) Nizami Cafarov (Azerbaijan, Baku State University) Gholam Reza Sabri Tabrizi (London, Edinburg Uni. King College) Sheref Boyraz (Turkey, Cumhuriyet University) Isa Habibbeyli (Azerbaijan, National Academy of Science) Yavuz Akpinar (Turkey, Ege University) Nazan Bekiroglu (Turkey, Karadeniz Technical University) Celil Nagiyev (Azerbaijan, Baku State University) Executive Editors Shafag Alizade Design Ilham Aliyev Contact address Journal of Baku Engineering University AZ0102, Khirdalan city, Hasan Aliyev str. 120, Absheron, Baku, Azerbaijan Tel: 00 994 12 - 349 99 95 Fax: 00 994 12 349-99-90/91 e-mail: [email protected] web: http://journal.beu.edu.az facebook: Journal Of Baku Engineering University Copyright © Baku Engineering University ISSN 2521-6333 ISSN 2521-6333 Journal of Baku Engineering University Baku - AZERBAIJAN Journal of Baku Engineering University 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • A Kazak Nyelv Színnevei
    Grezsa Bence A kazak nyelv színnevei Cikkem elkészülésében nyújtott folyamatos segítségéért és támogatásáért hálával tarto- zom tanáromnak és témavezetőmnek, dr. Khabtagaeva Bayarmának. Köszönettel tartozom to- vábbá a Szegedi Tudományegyetem Altajisztika Tanszék munkatársainak; dr. Ivanics Mária tanszékvezetőnek, dr. Mukusheva Rausangül, kazak lektornak, Biacsi Mónikának és Olach Zsuzsannának, akik hasznos tanácsokkal láttak el a cikkemet illetően. Bevezetés Tanulmányom a turkológiában egy kevésbé kutatott témával, a kazak nyelv színneveivel foglalkozik nyelvészeti szempontból. A kazak nyelv szókincse számos olyan elemmel rendel- kezik, amely valamilyen ótörök eredetű színnévre vezethető vissza. Noha több olyan munka is született, amely a török nyelvek színneveit tárgyalja – beleértve a kazakot is –, részletes áttekintést nem nyújtanak.1 A kazak színnevek többféle szempont alapján is csoportosíthatók. Munkámban a színneveket kulturális, jelentéstani és etimológiai szempontból vizsgálom. Elsődleges célom azon összetett szavak és szókapcsolatok bemutatása, illetve csoportosítása, amelyekben színnevek fordulnak elő. Annak érdekében, hogy megfelelően ismertessem a nyelv színrendszerét, rövid áttekintést nyúj- tok a kazak szóképzés szabályairól. Majd az alapszínnevek tárgyalása után a színnevekből képzett szavakat és szóösszetételeket vizsgálom a körülbelül ezer adatot tartalmazó szójegyzék alapján, amelyet Kenan Koç Kazak-török szótárából,2 Bektaev kazak–orosz, orosz–kazak nagyszótárából3 és Balakaev, Baskakov és Kenesbaev Kazak akadémiai nyelvtanából4 állítottam össze. A színek fi zikai tulajdonságainak, elnevezéseinek és jelentéseinek kutatásával több tudo- mányág is foglalkozik, mint például a fi zika, a neurológia, a szemiotika, a művészetelmélet, a szemantika és a fi lozófi a. A téma érdekessége abban áll, hogy a színnév-rendszerek nyelven- ként különbözőek. Sipőcz szerint5 létezhet olyan nyelv, ahol egy bizonyos szín jelölésére nem létezik elnevezés, ezért valamilyen árnyalattal vagy más színnel helyettesítve fejezik ki.
    [Show full text]