DOCSLIB.ORG

A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2001-12 A strategic plan for the Crusader Howitzer. Lockard, William M. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9707 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE CRUSADER HOWITZER by William M. Lockard December 2001 Thesis Advisor: David Matthews Associate Advisor: Keith Snider Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Title (Mix case letters) 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer 6. AUTHOR(S) William M. Lockard 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the current state of development of the Crusader Self Propelled Howitzer and the current threat of having its funding ended. The objective is to determine what actions are being taken by the Office of the Program Manager-Crusader (OPM-Crusader), in conjunction with the TRADOC System Manager, Cannon (TSM-Cannon) and the prime contractor, United Defense Limited Partnership (UDLP), in order to keep the program’s funding uninterrupted, bring the program into production, and deploy the system to the field. This thesis will present a well know management approach known as strategic planning and apply it to the efforts being made within the Crusader program. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Crusader Howitzer, Strategic Planning 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 72 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the current state of development of the Crusader Self Propelled Howitzer and the current threat of having its funding ended. The objective is to determine what actions are being taken by the Office of the Program Manager-Crusader (OPM-Crusader), in conjunction with the TRADOC System Manager, Cannon (TSM-Cannon) and the prime contractor, United Defense Limited Partnership (UDLP), in order to keep the program’s funding uninterrupted, bring the program into production, and deploy the system to the field. This thesis will present a well know management approach known as strategic planning and apply it to the efforts being made within the Crusader program. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. GENERAL INFORMATION.........................................................................1 B. RESEARCH QUESTIONS.............................................................................1 1. Primary Research Question................................................................1 2. Secondary Research Questions...........................................................1 C. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................1 D. SCOPE OF THESIS ........................................................................................3 E. METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................3 F. CHAPTER OUTLINE.....................................................................................4 1. Introduction..........................................................................................4 2. Background ..........................................................................................4 3. Data .......................................................................................................5 4. Analysis .................................................................................................5 5. Conclusions and Recommendations...................................................5 G. BENEFITS OF STUDY...................................................................................5 II. BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................7 A. PURPOSE.........................................................................................................7 B. HISTORY OF THE CRUSADER SELF PROPELLED HOWITZER......7 1. Operation Desert Storm ......................................................................7 2. The Crusader’s Expected Capabilities ..............................................9 3. The Army’s Transformation.............................................................11 4. The Crusader’s Role in the New Army............................................14 5. Significant Changes to the Crusader Howitzer...............................16 C. STRATEGIC PLANNING FUNDAMENTALS.........................................18 1. Definition of Strategic Planning .......................................................18 2. Benefits of Strategic Planning...........................................................18 3. Strategy Change Cycle ......................................................................19 D. BRYSON’S 10 STEP STRATEGIC PLANNING MODEL ......................20 1. Purpose of 10 Step Method ...............................................................20 2. The 10 Step Method...........................................................................21 3. Other Strategic Planning tools..........................................................22 a. The Value Net..........................................................................22 b. SWOT Matrix ..........................................................................23 E. SUMMARY...........................................................................................................24 III. DATA ..........................................................................................................................25 A. PURPOSE.......................................................................................................25 B. CRUSADER QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................25 C. RESPONSE OF OPM-CRUSADER............................................................26 1. Mandates.............................................................................................26 2. Stakeholders .......................................................................................26 vii 3. Strategic Champions..........................................................................26 4. SWOT..................................................................................................27 5. Strategic Issue.....................................................................................27 6. Current Strategies..............................................................................27 7. Vision...................................................................................................27 D. RESPONSE OF TSM-CANNON .................................................................28 1. Mandates.............................................................................................28 2. Stakeholders .......................................................................................28 3. Strategic Champions..........................................................................29 4. SWOT..................................................................................................29 5. Strategic Issue.....................................................................................29 6. Current Strategies..............................................................................30 E. RESPONSE OF UDLP..................................................................................30 1. Mandates.............................................................................................31 2. Stakeholders .......................................................................................31 3. Strategic Champions..........................................................................32
Recommended publications
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery Weapons Headquarters

    Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery Weapons Headquarters

    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford

    List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford

    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
  • The Artillery News

    The Artillery News

    THE ARTILLERY NEWS. JUNE – AUGUST 2007 Official Correspondence. R.A.A Assoc. of Tas. Inc. Hon. Secretary, Norman B. Andrews OAM., SBStJ. Tara Room, 24 Robin St; Newstead. Tas. 7250. E-Mail: [email protected] R.A.A. Association of Tasmania Inc. Homepage: http://www.tasartillery.o-f.com/ R.A.A.A.T. NORTHERN HISTORICAL- SOCIAL WING. APRIL 2007 The second informal get-together for 2007 of the R.A.A.A.T. Historical- Social Wing group was held at the QVM&AG at 2.00 p.m. on Thursday 12th April, 2007 and was attended by:- Norman Andrews (Hon. Sec.), Gunter Breier, Terry Higgins, Graeme Petterwood, Lloyd Saunders, Marc Smith, Frank Stokes, Charles Tee and Rick Wood.. We did receive apologies from several members - and we were aware of others who are still on the sick list – so ‘Get Wells’ are extended We also extend our sincere sympathy to our member Bob Brown who recently lost his dear wife through illness. Hang in there Bob…! Norm read several notes he had received from other Associations regarding their activities and also advised us of an invitation from Reg Watson regarding the Annual Boer War Commemorative Day which is to be held on Sunday 10 June 2007 commencing 12.00 noon at the Boer War Memorial in Launceston’s City Park. There will be an opportunity to present flowers, posy or wreath in memory of those Tasmanians who fought in and perhaps died in the South African War (1899-1902) Further inquiries phone Reg Watson 0409 975 587. 1 Launceston contact also will be Mr.
  • The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: the Case of Turkish Chrome Sales

    The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: the Case of Turkish Chrome Sales

    The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: The Case of Turkish Chrome Sales Inaugural-Dissertation in der Philosophischen Fakultät und Fachbereich Theologie der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg Vorgelegt von Murat Önsoy Aus der Türkei D29 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15 April 2009 Dekan: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Jens Kulenkampff. Erstgutachter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Thomas Philipp Zweitgutachter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Şefik Alp Bahadır ACKNOWLEDGMENTS An interesting coincidence took place in the first year of my PhD study, I would like to share it here. Soon after I moved to Erlangen, I started thinking over my PhD thesis topic. I was searching for an appropriate subject. Turkish Chrome Sales was one of the few topics that I had in my mind. One day, I went to my Doktorvater Prof. Thomas Philipp’s office and discussed the topics with him. We decided to postpone the decision a few days while I wanted to consider the topics one last time and do the final elimination. Afterwards I went to the cafeteria of the Friedrich Alexander University to have lunch. After the lunch, just before I left the cafeteria building, I recognized somebody speaking Turkish and reflexively turned around. He was a Turkish guest worker with a large thick moustache; I paid attention to his name tag for a second. His name was Krom, the Turkish word for chrome, since, for the first time in my life I was meeting someone with the name Krom I asked him about his name. Perhaps he is the only person with this name in Turkey. He told me that, this name was given by his father, who was a worker of a chrome mine in Central Anatolia and that day, when Mr.

  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0

    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
  • The Land Warfare Papers

    The Land Warfare Papers

    THE LAND WARFARE PAPERS No. 21 AUGUST 1995 The North Korean Military Threat in Perspective Edward B. Atkeson A National Security Affairs Paper Published on Occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington. Virginia THE NORTH KOREAN MILITARY THREAT IN PERSPEC TIVE by Edward B. Atkeson The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publica­ tion as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indi­ cate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned aboutimportant defense issues. LAND WARFARE PA PER NO. 21, AUGUST 1995 The North Korean Military Threat in Perspective by Edward B. Atkeson Major General Edward B. Atkeson, USA Ret., is a senior fellow at the Institute of Land Warfare, AUSA, and a private consultant on national and international security affairs. His final assignment prior to retirement from the Army in 1984 was to the Na­ tional Intelligence Council, where he served as National Intelligence Officerfor General Purpose Forces.
  • Weapons Transfers and Violations of the Laws of War in Turkey

    Weapons Transfers and Violations of the Laws of War in Turkey

    WEAPONS TRANSFERS AND VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR IN TURKEY Human Rights Watch Arms Project Human Right Watch New York AAA Washington AAA Los Angeles AAA London AAA Brussels Copyright 8 November 1995 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-81502 ISBN 1-56432-161-4 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords. It also includes five collaborative projects on arms transfers, children's rights, free expression, prison conditions, and women's rights. It maintains offices in New York, Washington, Los Angeles, London, Brussels, Moscow, Dushanbe, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong. Human Rights Watch is an independent, nongovernmental organization, supported by contributions from private individuals and foundations worldwide. It accepts no government funds, directly or indirectly. The staff includes Kenneth Roth, executive director; Cynthia Brown, program director; Holly J.
  • An Investigation of Aiming Point Strategies for Field Artillery Against Area Targets a T H E S I S Presented to T H E F a C

    An Investigation of Aiming Point Strategies for Field Artillery Against Area Targets a T H E S I S Presented to T H E F a C

    AN INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF GRADUATE STUDIES By LAWRENCE CARL PETERSEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1978 INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS Approved: Dougl&i C Montgome&fy, Chairman Leslie G. Callahan ' \ r-—: —' rrv[^rpvyvrm —~ Harrison M. Wadsworth Date approved by Chairman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Douglas C. Montgomery who served as my advisor and provided much assistance and guidance throughout this research. I am also grateful to the other members of the reading committee, Dr. Leslie G. Callahan and Dr. Harrison M. Wadsworth. Their suggestions and observations have greatly improved this thesis. I wish to thank Mr. Keith Myers and the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity for sponsoring the research; as well as Mr. Lonnie Minton of the Material Development Team, USAFAS, Fort Sill; Captain Allen Young of the TACFIRE Branch, Department of Combat Development, USAFAS, Fort Sill; and Mr. Merlyn Smith, BCS Technical Consultant for the Norden Division of United Technologies, for their valuable assistance. My most special thanks go to my wife, Barbara, for her patience, encouragement, and understanding during this research. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi SUMMARY viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 Description of the Problem Objective of the Research Scope of the Research II. LITERATURE REVIEW 6 The Coverage Problems Models III.
  • EXPORTS of Military Goods

    EXPORTS of Military Goods

    2019 EXPORTS of Military Goods www.exportcontrols.gc.ca - 0 - Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Summary of Key Data ........................................................................................................................... - 4 - 2. Canada’s Policy on the Export and Brokering of Military Items ........................................................... - 6 - Military Goods and Technology – “Groups 2 and 9” ............................................................................ - 7 - Export and Brokering Permit Assessment Process ............................................................................... - 8 - Brokering Controls ................................................................................................................................ - 9 - Notes on the Export of Firearms ........................................................................................................ - 10 - International Cooperation on Military Trade ..................................................................................... - 11 - The Canadian Defence, Security and Aerospace Industry………………………………………………………………- 11 - 3. Developments in 2019 ....................................................................................................................... - 11 - Coming into Force of Amendments to the Export and Import Permits Act ......................................
  • Record of Service of 147Th Field Artillery in France to 11Th November

    Record of Service of 147Th Field Artillery in France to 11Th November

    p - Hilton M. Briggs Library South Dakota State University RECORD OF SERVICE OF -- 147th. t FIELD ARTILLERY I J In France '. To 11th November 1918 , PETER NORBECK, Governor, South Dakota W. A. MORRIS, Adjutant General, South Dakota HQ. 147TH F. A. 1 JANUARY 1919. MEMORANDUM Sketch Showing Manner in Which the 147th F. A., 66th F. A. Brig., 41st Div., Was Organized ·a Oct. 1917 After Arrival 4th S. Dak. Inf. at Camp Greene, Charlotte, N. C., on 2 Oct 1917. Pursuant to verbal order, Commanding General, 41st Division, 3 October, 1917, the 4th S. Dak. Inf·antry was df.sorganized and new units formed as indicated. Field and Stat! _________ Field a.nd Sta!! "All State V~a.d.)uartera Co1;,pany _________ -readguartera Co anton• . ~~l~lX Com~any _ ________,_~C~JlL. ote.te ,,.(/ Company A " ; / Bat ter_y A 1 "Pierre• -....... , .,, 1 "Portiand"- - ~or,rp~i____ ,_,..: ,., 9atterLJL_._ Sioux Fa~le" --'-<. .'" ', 11 "Portl:i.nd" - 147th F. A. Company C ---··- -~--'.:.::,, ~7t~Battery C -) u. s. "Brookings" :::: :: ~ _ ~..,. r - A r m y. ) Con.ps.ny D . '... -1':.....,_ Battery 0 • 11 Pa.rker" ------ - _ ' 1' ---- Company E__ - -,'f:: ..::-,.,.Battary_ E & 4th "Howard Webster"~ 11 ----- S.De.k. (­ .Q_q__~ny F _ ', 1 1 Battery F In!, - "Uitohell" ---..,, '-,,/ .., ,;' . N. G. COrQl2ill:!x_Q_ ____ ___ , ,i..,..,- / Uedical Det. _ "Redfield" -- ... '>-1'r::., / / - ~...P~.!1I..l!11 ---··--·- __ ,, ;:- ... '~ / ( Lead 11 : '::;~,-l116th Su-rply ~an.Y._I 1 / / , , _ l 1 -"Rapid City" ~, !/. 1 / 1 T r a 1 n, K 1 ._/ / 1 Company 1 "Lemmon 11 -- - - -- f.,,:.
  • Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond

    Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond

    Army Fires Capabilities for 2025 and Beyond John Gordon IV, Igor Mikolic-Torreira, D. Sean Barnett, Katharina Ley Best, Scott Boston, Dan Madden, Danielle C. Tarraf, Jordan Willcox C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2124 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9967-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Army photo by Spc. Josselyn Fuentes. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Army Fires for Army 2025, sponsored by the Field Artil- lery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma (a part of the U.S.
  • The Korean War

    The Korean War

    N ATIO N AL A RCHIVES R ECORDS R ELATI N G TO The Korean War R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 1 0 3 COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 N AT I ONAL A R CH I VES R ECO R DS R ELAT I NG TO The Korean War COMPILED BY REBEccA L. COLLIER R EFE R ENCE I NFO R MAT I ON P A P E R 103 N ATIO N AL A rc HIVES A N D R E C O R DS A DMI N IST R ATIO N W ASHI N GTO N , D C 2 0 0 3 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives records relating to the Korean War / compiled by Rebecca L. Collier.—Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2003. p. ; 23 cm.—(Reference information paper ; 103) 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration.—Catalogs. 2. Korean War, 1950-1953 — United States —Archival resources. I. Collier, Rebecca L. II. Title. COVER: ’‘Men of the 19th Infantry Regiment work their way over the snowy mountains about 10 miles north of Seoul, Korea, attempting to locate the enemy lines and positions, 01/03/1951.” (111-SC-355544) REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 103: NATIONAL ARCHIVES RECORDS RELATING TO THE KOREAN WAR Contents Preface ......................................................................................xi Part I INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF THE PAPER ........................................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW OF THE ISSUES .................................................................................................................1