DOCSLIB.ORG

Type of Paper: Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Type of Paper: Code Transcript Q&A Iraq: Searching for Stability in an Unstable Region HE Dr Ali Al-Dabbagh Spokesman for the Iraqi Government, Republic of Iraq Dr Toby Dodge, Reader in International Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science Emma Sky Visiting Professor, War Studies Department, Kings College, London Chair: Sir Jeremy Greenstock Council, Chatham House; Special Envoy for Iraq (2003-2004); and Chairman, UN Association UK 19 June 2012 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/ speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions, but the ultimate responsibility for accuracy lies with this document’s author(s). The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. Transcript: Searching for Stability in an Unstable Region Jeremy Greenstock: Well thank you, all three of you, for those introductory remarks. Let’s get into a discussion of this. I’m about to open the floor to questions but before I do that, Minister, I would just like to give you chance to respond to what you’ve heard from the other two because there’s a clear observation there that there is a trend back towards authoritarianism. Many Iraqis might say, ‘You need a strong man in Iraq, we’re a divided and perhaps divisive people, our history shows that. You need somebody with a strong hand at the centre.’ Could you say a bit more about what is in the Prime Minister’s mind, what he wants to create in Iraq, and what the capacity is for coalition politics in Iraq? Because as other countries in the Middle East region begin to change their systems of government, once they’ve got rid of the previous lot, they’re finding it very difficult to agree amongst themselves where they go to next. Is that still the state of affairs in Iraq and how does the Prime Minister want to get out of that trend and bring the people’s interest into this? Ali Al-Dabbagh: Thank you. I almost do agree with all the presentation of our friends, what they have said. Being a Prime Minister in a country like Iraq, I think, is not an easy job. I don’t want to polish any face [sic], by the way, and I don’t want to defend the wrong policies but I do agree that a country like Iraq, which inherited huge difficulties and problems and those that live in Iraq, could understand what I mean. The additional regional influence, plus the sectarian element which we are facing now, and the regional competition, and being looked at as an Iranian [style] state, a man who is ruling Iraq or a man like the prime minister needs to have a formula and needs to make the political process inclusive of everybody, which is again with all this taking consideration, is not an easy job. Taking consideration that in 2006, when he had been elected as the prime minister, [that the] Western side of Iraq was in the hands of Al-Qaeda. In the day time the government could make a rally in Al Anbar and even Baghdad and places like Baghdad but the security was not in the hands of the government. In Basra, the people are there without the control of the government, the British were there and they could know much better the situation. The man came and he did whatever he had to do in Basra, and Baghdad and Al Anbar with the help of the Alliances and especially the Americans. Finally, the situation calms, and don’t deny that also there is www.chathamhouse.org 2 Transcript: Searching for Stability in an Unstable Region parties, as Toby had said, and the parties know how they would rule the Ministries that they would be in charge for; it is totally like their farm. I don’t exclude any of the parties which are participating in the government. So we end up with this situation. I do agree that Iraq needs a strong man but a strong man subjected to the rule of law. This is the very important issue. The Prime Minister’s thinking that there is a conspiracy from neighbouring countries against him and against Iraq. Most of you are analysts and you could read that. What is this situation? Iraq is not [in] the system, Iraq is not welcomed. None of the countries are welcoming the way of governance in Iraq – maybe Kuwait is an exception – but all of the countries have a hand and especially taking now [with] a Turkish role in the region, the situation has been escalated by both the prime ministers in Turkey and Iraq. All of this is on Maliki, to think that, you know, there is a great conspiracy by the neighbouring countries. They want to crush him and they want to destroy him. Even today [this] morning he had a meeting and he said this is a conspiracy against me and the people who want to make a no-confidence vote are a conspiracy [sic]. He is under the impression that the regional countries led by Turkey want to make this no confidence vote against him. Again you should read it in this way; that he is feeling that there is a real conspiracy to try and get him out. I’m quite sure that many of the people might know will agree with this, but again with the situation that he is running, I think he is in a very difficult situation, a very hard situation, and meeting all the demands of the services of the people, under the pressure of the election he is behaving in a way to maintain at least the unity. Again one more issue which is Kurdistan. Kurdistan is a dispute which, I think, is more and more on hand. He will not agree that what al-Mutlaq said and what Allawi was saying because at the end they are a competitor. Because others, they would like to share his power which is defined in the constitution. With the security, he is Commander-in-Chief. This is not shared with the other parties. He should take their opinion in the national council, a security council which takes the important and main decisions of security there. There, there is a committee, like a ministerial committee. He cannot take the opinion of Saleh al-Mutlaq, Tariq al-Hashemi, Ayad Allawi or the others while taking any decision on the security. He thought that the security is not shared with the others. The other thing is all the decisions have been taken in the cabinet and I think the cabinet proved to be out of all the problems and disputes and the differences which is going on right now. I think the Prime Minister, www.chathamhouse.org 3 Transcript: Searching for Stability in an Unstable Region remarkably, has managed to chair the cabinet in a professional way, not to politicise it, and not making it any reflection of the political disputes of the cabinet. Thank you. Right, open to the floor. If I call you, please stand up, state your name and ask a question quite quickly. Not any statements please. I’ll move from the left at the front there and I’ll come through the hands that have been raised. Question 1: One of the things that Mr Mailiki said a little while ago was that one of the reasons he was unhappy with the constitution was that it had been foisted on them rather quickly and needed some adjustment. I was surprised at that because in October, November and December, way back in 2002, all the major parties in opposition met together and produced a detailed paper – you probably remember this, The Transition to Democracy in Iraq – and one of things the paper called for was a democratically and federally structured Iraq based on principles of separation of powers, the protection of individual and group human rights and setting out a road map for transition to a permanent constitution. I’m rather worried that in fact the excuse of a slightly underdeveloped constitution is being used to actually just coalesce centralised power and I certainly reject any idea that the Kurdistan regional government isn’t particularly playing fairly. So could I ask the question, why is Mr Maliki centralising power? And, frankly, you’re making him sound paranoid. Jeremy Greenstock: Let’s take one or two more questions so we can see what the tone of the room is. The fourth row there and the back left. Question 2: My question is it seems from what Your Excellency said that what Prime Minister Maliki needs at the moment is allies and he seems to be creating enemies so do you think that there will be a solution with his confrontation with [inaudible] that is more political and do you think that any of the remaining so called ‘Resistance of Saddam’ people are still doing some of the violent acts on the Iraqi scene? Thank you.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suez 1956 24 Planning the Intervention 26 During the Intervention 35 After the Intervention 43 Musketeer Learning 55
    Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd i 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East Louise Kettle 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iiiiii 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Louise Kettle, 2018 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road, 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/1 3 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3795 0 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3797 4 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3798 1 (epub) The right of Louise Kettle to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 55842_Kettle.indd842_Kettle.indd iivv 006/09/186/09/18 111:371:37 AAMM Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Learning from History 1 Learning from History in Whitehall 3 Politicians Learning from History 8 Learning from the History of Military Interventions 9 How Do We Learn? 13 What is Learning from History? 15 Who Learns from History? 16 The Learning Process 18 Learning from the History of British Interventions in the Middle East 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016
    Civil Courage News Journal of the Civil Courage Prize Vol. 12, No. 2 • September 2016 For Steadfast Resistance to Evil at Great Personal Risk Sir Jeremy Greenstock to RBSS Wins the 2016 Civil Courage Deliver Keynote Address at Prize for Risking Their Lives to Expose Civil Courage Prize Ceremony the Atrocities in ISIS-Controlled Raqqa n October 27th, the Civil he 2016 Civil Courage OCourage Prize Ceremony's TPrize has been awarded to keynote address will be given by Sir RBSS, "Raqqa Is Being Slaughtered Jeremy Greenstock, Train Foundation Silently." RBSS is a group of usually Advisor and until recently, Chairman of anonymous young men and women the United Nations Association of the U.K. who secretly film the kidnappings, Prior to his long and distinguished torture and murders carried out by career with the the Islamic State (ISIS) in Raqqa, British Diplo- Syria, and expose these atrocities to matic Service, Sir the world. monitored by ISIS. It is now too Jeremy worked Raqqa was a bustling and fairly dangerous for them to post on Twit- as an assistant prosperous city on the Euphrates ter and Facebook or talk to journal- master at Eton River in north central Syria when ists. Members outside the city College from ISIS took it over. Their powerful in- continue to contribute to social 1966 to 1969, ternet propaganda campaign at- media and use fake names with jour- when he left to tracted fanatical followers from all nalists, since they can no longer trust join the Foreign Sir Jeremy Greenstock over the world, making Raqqa a anyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Partnership Spring Newsletter 2006
    Atlantic Partnership Spring Newsletter 2006 Atlantic Partnership Editorial CLIMBING BACK When two climbers roped together fall on a rock face, it’s likely to be terminal. For a while that seemed on the cards for American and Europe at the depths of the crisis over Iraq, despite all the common interests and historic bonds which have kept them together for a century and more. Memories are short and we tend to put out of our minds how close we came to disaster. Europe was split down the middle: Old Europe and New Europe. France and Germany seemed minded to drift off into a separate orbit. The United States was on virtual no-speaks with both, and close to writing off Europe altogether. Public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic was in truculent mood – remember Freedom Fries? - and anti-Americanism rampant in Europe. We are not out of the woods yet. Echoes of the split over Iraq are still reverberating in the growing European clamour for Guantanamo to be closed and the resentment over 1 renditions. On each side of the Atlantic, there is a feeling that the other side is in trouble. Europeans see President Bush’s standing in the opinion polls plummeting and wonder what it presages for the mid-term elections. A change of control in House or Senate could spell paralysis for the remainder of President Bush’s Administration. Americans for their part see a series of political crises in Western Europe – scandal in France, the loss of a key American ally in Signor Berlusconi, and Tony Blair increasingly sabotaged by a divided and fractious Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Seminar 3 the United Nations and International Peace and Security
    The United Nations at 70 - Witness seminar 3 The United Nations and international peace and security: Navigating a divided world? British perspectives Programme 1000-1015 Welcome and introduction Mr Edward Mortimer CMG, President of the British Association of Former United Nations Civil Servants (BAFUNCS) 1015-1130 Session 1: The UK on the Security Council: Assessing the Record after 70 Years Chair: Dame Glynne Evans Panellist 1: Ambassador Matthew Rycroft, UK Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Panellist 2: Mr Andrew Whitley, Policy and Advocacy Director, The Elders Respondent 1: Mr Sam Daws, Director, Project on UN Governance and Reform, Centre for International Studies, Oxford University Respondent 2: Mr Yves Doutriaux, former Deputy Permanent Representative of France to the UN 1130-1145 Refreshment break 1145-1300 Session 2: Prevention and early action Chair: Professor Dominik Zaum, University of Reading Panellist 1: Lord Williams of Baglan, Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Chatham House Panellist 2: Sir Kieran Prendergast Respondent 1: Dr Jennifer Welsh, UN Special Adviser for the Responsibility to Protect Respondent 2: Dr Francesc Vendrell, former UN Mediator at the Department of Political Affairs 1 The United Nations at 70 - Witness seminar 3 13 January 2016, Church House, London 1300-1400 Lunch 1400-1515 Session 3: Peacekeeping and peacebuilding Chair: Professor Mats Berdal, King's College London Panellist 1: Dr Babu Rahman, Deputy Head of Research Analysts, Multilateral Policy Directorate, Foreign and Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION 1 CONTENTS 03 Message from the Chairman 04 Forward Thinking: The Foward Way 06 Forward Thinking: Our Philosophy 07 The Current Cost of Conflict in the Middle-East 08 Foreword: What has happened to ‘Noblesse oblige’? by Sir Jeremy Greenstock 10 Middle East Programme 16 Helsinki Policy Forum 22 Tunisia Programme 24 UK Programme 28 Our Finances 29 Our Staff 2 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN It has been another challenging year, with a sense of deepening crisis in large parts of the Middle East. Conflicts, with their tragic humanitarian consequences, continue to rage in Libya, Syria and Yemen. Regional tensions are mounting and threaten to unleash further violence unless checked. Meanwhile there are still few public signs of any meaningful progress towards a durable resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In this difficult context, the demand for Forward Thinking’s services as mediators and facilitators remains exceptionally high. We continue to work on the principle that only through maintaining confidential spaces for dialogue is it possible to resolve challenges and build the conditions for a peaceful, prosperous and secure Middle East. In this spirit, the past twelve months of activity have been highly significant for Forward Thinking. In the Middle East, in spite of all the current challenges, we have successfully established an avenue for Israelis and Palestinians political figures to directly meet and exchange honest reflections on how to begin moving beyond the current impasse. In the Helsinki Policy Forum, we have maintained a channel for key figures from Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey to exchange ideas on where co- operation might be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
    Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 6 July 2016 for The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors Volume V Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 6 July 2016 HC 265-V 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 1 17/06/2016 12:48 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474110136 Web ISBN 9781474110143 ID 23051601 46561 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 2 17/06/2016 12:48 Volume V CONTENTS 5 Advice on the legal basis for military action, November 2002 to March 2003 1 6.1 Development of the military options for an invasion of Iraq 171 6.2 Military planning for the invasion, January to March 2003 385 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 3 17/06/2016 12:48 46561_17b Viking_Volume V Title Page.indd 4 17/06/2016 12:48 SECTION 5 ADVICE ON THE LEGAL BASIS FOR MILITARY ACTION, NOVEMBER 2002 TO MARCH 2003 Contents Introduction and key findings ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UN at 70 – Prelims
    Broken Chair Monument, Palais des Nations, Geneva A symbol of interdependence: Development cooperation, humanitarian action, peace and security and human rights This wooden sculpture is by the Swiss artist Daniel Berset and was constructed by the carpenter Louis Genève from a project by Paul Vermeulen, co-founder and director of Handicap International Suisse. Situated near the entrance to the Palais des Nations in Geneva, this monumental giant chair with one broken leg symbolises opposition to land mines and cluster bombs and is intended as thought-piece for politicians and other visitors. Standing 39 feet high and weighing 5.5 tons it was erected in 1997 and dedicated to support the signature of an international treaty on a ban on cluster bombs in 2008 (the Convention on Cluster Munitions). This Evidence Report reinterprets the meaning of the sculpture to illustrate some of the key themes of the UN at 70 Witness Seminar programme, to show: ● The interdependence of the four key pillars of UN support: development cooperation, humanitarian action, peace and security and human rights; ● The principle that these themes should be integrated together, and not considered as independent ‘silos’: if one or more themes are not adequately addressed, the total impact of UN support, norms and standards are weakened; ● The UN is uniquely placed to provide legitimacy, standards, norms and goals to address international challenges in all four areas. i Acknowledgements The Editors would like to thank the following for their many and varied contributions
    [Show full text]
  • The Territorial Integrity of Iraq, 2003-2007 : Invocation, Violation, Viability.', Geoforum., 40 (3)
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 20 May 2010 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Elden, Stuart and Williams, Alison J. (2009) 'The territorial integrity of Iraq, 2003-2007 : invocation, violation, viability.', Geoforum., 40 (3). pp. 407-417. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.009 Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk The Territorial Integrity of Iraq: Invocation, Violation, Viability Authors Professor Stuart Elden Geography Department Durham University South Road Durham DH1 3LE 0191 334 1945 [email protected] Dr Alison J Williams (corresponding author) Geography Department University of Liverpool Roxby Building Liverpool L69 7RX 0151 794 2855 [email protected] 1 The Territorial Integrity of Iraq: Invocation, Violation, Viability Abstract This paper considers the ways in which Iraq‘s territorial integrity has been invoked by the international community, how it has been violated by the US-led coalition both before and since 2003, and how these acts have called into question the future viability of the Iraqi state.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL STRATEGY FORUM Lecture Series 2015 - 2016
    GLOBAL STRATEGY FORUM Lecture Series 2015 - 2016 www.globalstrategyforum.org Professor Margaret MacMillan and Lord Lothian General Sir Peter Wall and Lord Lothian Sir Jeremy Greenstock and Lord Lothian Stephen Grey and Sir Malcolm Rifkind Rob Wainwright and Lord West of Spithead The 10th Anniversary Lecture: Lord Lothian and Lord Stirrup www.globalstrategyforum.org GLOBAL STRATEGY FORUM Lecture Series 2015 - 2016 3 www.globalstrategyforum.org 4 www.globalstrategyforum.org GLOBAL STRATEGY FORUM President Johan Eliasch is the President of Global Strategy Forum. He is Chairman and CEO of HEAD (the global sporting goods group), Chairman of Aman Resorts, Equity Partners, London Films and Co- Chairman of Cool Earth. He is an advisory board member of Brasilinvest, Societe du Louvre, Capstar, the Centre for Social Justice, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Foundation for Renewable Energy and Environment and a member of the Mayor of Rome’s and Jerusalem’s International Business Advisory Councils. He is a Patron of Stockholm University and a trustee of the Kew Foundation. He is the Founder of the Rainforest Trust which is conserving 400,000 acres of rainforest in the Amazonas. He was part of the Conservative Shadow Foreign Office team as Special Advisor on European Affairs (1999-2003) and responsible for foreign relations (2003-2005). He was Conservative Party Deputy Treasurer (2003-2007). He is the former Special Representative of the Prime Minister of the UK for Deforestation and Clean Energy (2007-2010). Chairman The Most Hon the Marquess of Lothian PC QC DL is the Chairman of Global Strategy Forum. He was first elected to Parliament as Michael Ancram in 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • The P-5 and Nuclear Nonproliferation Working Group Report
    THE P-5 AND NUclEAR NONprOLIFERATION Working Group Report Working Group Members Yury Belobrov Sir Jeremy Greenstock Li Chang-he Thomas R. Pickering Guillaume Schlumberger Cover photo credits: (top) UN Security Council briefing on nonproliferation, 19 September 2007, Project Director UN photo/Ryan Brown, © United Nations; (bottom) flags of the UN Security Council, © Corbis Corp. December 2007 Robert J. Einhorn THE P-5 AND NUclEAR NONprOLIFERATION Working Group Report Working Group Members Yury Belobrov Sir Jeremy Greenstock Li Chang-he Thomas R. Pickering Guillaume Schlumberger Project Director December 2007 Robert J. Einhorn Blank Contents About the P-5 Working Group IV Introduction 1 Observations 2 Suggestions for Consideration by P-5 Governments 7 Conclusions 14 Annex 1. About the Authors 17 Annex 2. Supplementary Observations 20 Annex 3. The P-5 and Nonproliferation: The Historical Record 24 iii About the P-5 Working Group This report was prepared by a five-member working group of nongovernmental experts (all of whom previously served in government) from each of the five countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council. The members were Mr. Yury Belobrov, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Mr. Li Chang-he, Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering, and Mr. Guillaume Schlumberger. The project director was Mr. Robert J. Einhorn. Short biographies of the participants are contained in annex 1. The P-5 and Nonproliferation Project was organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based, bipartisan policy research institute, and supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. iv The P-5 and Nuclear Nonproliferation Introduction The nuclear nonproliferation regime that for decades helped promote international peace and security today faces serious challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
    Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 6 July 2016 for The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors Volume III Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 6 July 2016 HC 265-III 46561_10b Viking_Volume III Title Page.indd 1 21/06/2016 12:56 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474110136 Web ISBN 9781474110143 ID 23051601 46561 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce 46561_10b Viking_Volume III Title Page.indd 2 21/06/2016 12:56 Volume III CONTENTS 3.6 Development of UK strategy and options, November 2002 to January 2003 1 3.7 Development of UK strategy and options, 1 February to 7 March 2003 177 3.8 Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003 399 46561_10b Viking_Volume III Title Page.indd 3 21/06/2016 12:56 46561_10b Viking_Volume III Title Page.indd 4 21/06/2016 12:56 SECTION 3.6 DEVELOPMENT OF UK STRATEGY AND OPTIONS, NOVEMBER 2002 TO JANUARY 2003 Contents Introduction and key findings ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army and the Battle for Baghdad: Lessons Learned
    C O R P O R A T I O N The U.S. Army and the Battle for Baghdad Lessons Learned—And Still to Be Learned David E. Johnson, Agnes Gereben Schaefer, Brenna Allen, Raphael S. Cohen, Gian Gentile, James Hoobler, Michael Schwille, Jerry M. Sollinger, Sean M. Zeigler For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3076 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019940985 ISBN: 978-0-8330-9601-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Lessons Learned from 13 Years of Conflict: The Battle for Baghdad, 2003–2008, spon- sored by the Office of Quadrennial Defense Review, U.S.
    [Show full text]