DOCSLIB.ORG

Response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review Response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review Tuesday, 7 September 2010 INTRODUCTION This paper is written in response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ (DEWHA) Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review (the Review). The structure of FOXTEL’s response is as follows: 1. Overview of FOXTEL’s business and reconciliation activity 2. Relevant background including: - The rise of the digital economy - Indigenous broadcasting and the digital economy 3. Policy recommendations re NITV including covering: - Importance of independence, certainty and adequate funding for NITV - Free to air broadcast of NITV and the Digital Dividend - Training and skills development For further information on this submission, please contact: Mr Adam Suckling Director, Policy & Corporate Affairs FOXTEL E: [email protected] P: 02 9813 6140 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The rise of the digital economy – including lower production and distribution costs, increased consumer empowerment and the demand for greater channel choice – mean that it is more economically feasible to produce and distribute channels such as NITV, and also to find audiences who are interested in programming such as NITV’s, than it ever has been. While such developments in the digital economy make it possible to provide, and find audiences for a channel such as NITV, there are also political, cultural and social reasons why NITV should continue to be funded on a sustainable basis and maintain an independent editorial voice and governance: Cultural – Indigenous Australians have over 40,000 years of cultural development as well as distinct and multiple perspectives on contemporary Australia. This history and contemporary perspective provides a rich source of stories from which Indigenous Australians can draw on, which are not only important for the first Australians, but can also illuminate and add to Australia’s understanding of itself and broader cultural identity. Having a sustainably funded NITV provides an important vehicle for telling and broadcasting such Aboriginal stories. Political – There is some support across the political spectrum for NITV. The channels was set up and funded by the previous coalition Government. Its continuation and expansion was also supported by the subsequent Labor Government’s creative panel at the ‘20:20 Summit’. The Government said in its response it is considering a range of options in relation to NITV. Social – NITV has provided an important vehicle for broader reconciliation, training Indigenous Australians in the digital industries of the 21st Century (for instance NITV directly employs 35 Indigenous Australians and over the past four years has worked with 40 production entities that are Indigenous controlled or have significant Indigenous input), and broadcasting programs – such as health and education programs aimed specifically at Indigenous Australians – that can play a part in educating and informing, and ‘Closing the Gap’. The outlays from the Federal budgets to support NITV have been comparatively modest – compared with the funding that the ABC and SBS receive. For instance, in 2009/10 NITV received just over $15m in funding from the Government compared with $858m for the ABC. In other words, NITV received or 1.7% compared with ABC’s $858m budget. Recommendations Against this backdrop, FOXTEL recommends the following in response to the DEWHA’s Issues Paper: 1. Funding for Indigenous Broadcasting to be distributed under the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, consistent with funding for the ABC and SBS, rather than DEWHA were it currently sits. 2. NITV continues to be funded on a basis that it can maintain an independent editorial voice and governance. 3. A minimum of five years funding to be allocated to NITV to provide certainty and to assist with planning. 4. An increase in NITV’s modest funding in comparison to the ABC and SBS, to support new productions, delivery over new digital and terrestrial platforms, such as mobile and internet, and to provide opportunities for the Independent Indigenous production sector. 5. Make NITV available free to air to provide maximum access for Indigenous and non-Indigenous audiences through allocation of one block of Digital Dividend spectrum to community broadcast (as well as providing funding for such transmission). 6. Funding for scholarships, sponsorship and dedicated placements in schools and tertiary institutions to fill a shortage of skilled Indigenous candidates in production, post production and technical operations. 1. ABOUT FOXTEL FOXTEL is Australia's leading subscription television provider and is connected to over 1.63 million subscribing households on cable and satellite through retail and wholesale distribution. FOXTEL strives to ensure our six million viewers find TV they want to watch every time they switch on their television through delivery of more than 200 channels covering news, sport, general entertainment, movies, documentaries, music and children’s programming. FOXTEL commenced distributing its services on cable with 20 channels in 1995, expanding to 31 channels and satellite distribution in 1999 and increased its offering to 45 channels in 2002 following the completion of the FOXTEL-Optus Content Supply Agreement. The FOXTEL Digital service was launched in 2004, and FOXTEL is now giving Australian viewers the choice of more than 200 Digital channels. Since its launch, FOXTEL has extended its Digital innovations by adding a raft of new channels and interactive features including additional news, sports and weather applications, as well as FOXTEL iQ, a fully integrated Personal Digital Recorder, launched in 2005. FOXTEL launched its mobile service – Telstra Mobile FOXTEL in 2006 which now carries 33 channels and is one of the world’s most substantial mobile offerings. The live broadcast service FOXTEL Live2Air on Virgin Blue was launched in August 2006 and is now available across Australia on the Virgin Blue jet fleet providing 24 channels of live FOXTEL. FOXTEL launched its High Definition service in June 2008 with five dedicated 24- hour HD channels- BBC HD, Discovery HD, National Geographic Channel HD, FOX SPORTS HD and ESPN HD plus Australian television premiere blockbuster movies available immediately when you want them through the FOXTEL Box Office HD On Demand service. The new generation FOXTEL iQ2 combines HD programming with a huge disk drive and intuitive and easy to use electronic programming guide making it even easier for subscribers to watch what they want and when they want. FOXTEL launched FOXTEL Next Generation in November 2009 which provides customers with: the increased choice of 30 new channels; new navigation features such as iSuggest – which enhances navigation with 200 fresh movie and program suggestions for iQ recording every week - and Record Me – which allows you to record shows directly from an on-air program promotion; the most comprehensive HD offering in Australia of 15 HD channels; and Sky News Local which provides a dedicated local news service for each major Australian capital city. In 2010 FOXTEL announced a ground breaking partnership with Microsoft to offer around 30 FOXTEL channels over the internet direct to our customers’ television sets via Microsoft’s Xbox Live product. FOXTEL and Microsoft aim to launch the new service towards the end of the calendar year. FOXTEL will offer FOXTEL on Xbox Live with various packaging and prices and under flexible agreements. FOXTEL will also launch in late 2010 FOXTEL services over the internet direct to FOXTEL customers’ television sets via around 780,000 deployed internet enabled iQ boxes. This new service will be launched towards the end of this calendar year. The service will offer customers even more choice and control over their television viewing, liberating a video store of choice with hundreds of On Demand movies and television programs. FOXTEL directly employs more than 1900 people and a further 1400 workers are indirectly engaged by FOXTEL in sales and installation services nationally. The FOXTEL Television Centre at North Ryde in Sydney is the headquarters of FOXTEL's national subscription television operations and houses FOXTEL’s television studios, broadcast operations and cable and satellite transmission facilities. FOXTEL also operates a national Customer Solutions Centre based at Moonee Ponds in Melbourne, a purpose built state of the art call centre. FOXTEL is owned by Telstra Corporation Ltd (50%), The News Corporation Ltd (25%), and Consolidated Media Holdings Limited (25%). A full overview of FOXTEL’s products and business can be found at www.foxtel.com.au. FOXTEL & Reconciliation As a digital subscription broadcaster reaching six million viewers each week (7.5 million with AUSTAR subscribers), FOXTEL has a powerful and unique opportunity to contribute to reconciliation through reaching audiences and providing economic opportunities in one the industries of the future. FOXTEL recently published its second Reconciliation Action Plan (RAP) in conjunction with Reconciliation Australia. FOXTEL’s RAP promotes cultural respect, builds core relationships with Indigenous suppliers, and provides Indigenous employment opportunities and skills development in-house. FOXTEL’s RAP can be found at www.reconciliation.org.au. FOXTEL welcomed NITV to the platform in 2007, providing access to every subscribing household. FOXTEL continues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impartiality in Opinion Content (July 2008)
    Quality Assurance Project 5: Impartiality (Opinion Content) Final Report July 2008 Advise. Verify. Review ABC Editorial Policies Editorial Policies The Editorial Policies of the ABC are its leading standards and a day-to-day reference for makers of ABC content. The Editorial Policies – • give practical shape to statutory obligations in the ABC Act; • set out the ABC’s self-regulatory standards and how to enforce them; and • describe and explain to staff and the community the editorial and ethical principles fundamental to the ABC. The role of Director Editorial Policies was established in 2007 and comprises three main functions: to advise, verify and review. The verification function principally involves the design and implementation of quality assurance projects to allow the ABC to assess whether it is meeting the standards required of it and to contribute to continuous improvement of the national public broadcaster and its content. Acknowledgements The project gained from the sustained efforts of several people, and the Director Editorial Policies acknowledges: Denis Muller, Michelle Fisher, Manager Research, and Jessica List, Executive Assistant. Thanks also to Ian Carroll and John Cameron, respectively the Directors of the Innovation Division and the News Division, and to their senior staff, whose engagement over the details of editorial decision-making gave the project layers that an assessment of this sort usually lacks. This paper is published by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation © 2008 ABC For information about the paper, please contact: Director Editorial Policies ABC Southbank Centre GPO Box 9994 Melbourne VIC 3001 Phone: +61 3 9626 1631 Email: [email protected] QA Project 05 – Final Report July 2008 ABC Editorial Policies Foreword Opinion and impartiality – are there any other words which, when paired, are more fraught for a public broadcaster? Is any other pair of words more apparently paradoxical? Opinion content is commissioned or acquired by the ABC to provide a particular perspective or point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • PSB Report Definitions
    Definitions: Channel groups (1) Channel group Output & Spend definition TV Viewing Audience Opinion Legal Definition BBC One, BBC Two, BBC Three, BBC All BBC channels (BBC Four, BBC News, BBC Parliament, CBBC, One, BBC Two, BBC CBeebies, BBC streaming channels, BBC Three, BBC Four, BBC BBC One, BBC Two, BBC HD (to March 2013) and BBC Olympics News , BBC Parliament Three, BBC Four, BBC News, channels (2012 only). ITV Network* (inc ,CBeebies, CBBC, BBC PSB Channels BBC Parliament, ITV/ITV ITV Breakfast), Channel 4, Channel 5 and Alba, all BBC HD Breakfast, Channel 4, Channel S4C (S4C is added to C4 2008-2009 and channels), the Channel 3 5,, BBC CBBC, CBeebies excluded from 2010 onwards post-DSO in services (provided by ITV, Wales). HD variants are included where STV and UTV), Channel 4, applicable (but not +1s). Channel 5, and S4C. BBC One, BBC Two, ITV Network (inc ITV BBC One, BBC Two, ITV/ITV Main five PSB Breakfast), Channel 4, Channel 5. HD BBC One, BBC Two, Breakfast, Channel 4, Channel channels variants are included where applicable ITV/STV/UTV, Channel 4, 5 (but not +1s). Channel 5 BBC One, BBC Two, BBC Three, BBC Four , BBC Main PSB channels News, ITV/STV/UTV, combined Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C Commercial PSB ITV/ITV Breakfast, Channel 4, Channels Channel 5 ITV+1 Network (inc ITV Breakfast) , ITV2, ITV2+1, ITV3, ITV3+1, ITV4, ITV4+1, CITV, Channel 4+1, E4, E4 +1, More4, CITV, ITV2, ITV3, ITV4, Commercial PSB More4 +1, Film4, Film4+1, 4Music, 4Seven, E4, Film4, More4, 5*, Portfolio Channels 4seven, Channel 4 Paralympics channels 5USA (2012 only), Channel 5+1, 5*, 5*+1, 5USA, 5USA+1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market in Context
    2. Television and audio visual 0 Figure 2.1 Industry metrics UK television industry 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total TV industry revenue (£bn) 10.5 10.6 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.7 Proportion of revenue generated by public funds 25% 25% 25% 24% 25% 23% Proportion of revenue generated by advertising 35% 33% 32% 31% 28% 30% Proportion of revenue generated by subscriptions 35% 36% 37% 39% 41% 41% TV as a proportion of total advertising spend 30% 28% 27% 27% 28% 29% Spend on originated output by 5 main networks (£bn) 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.5 Digital TV take-up 61.9% 69.7% 86.3% 87.1% 91.4% 92.5% Proportion of DTV homes paying for TV (Q1) 64% 60% 55% 53% 55% 55% Viewing per head, per day (hours) in all homes 3.65 3.60 3.63 3.74 3.75 4.04 Share of the five main channels in all homes 70% 67% 64% 61% 58% 56% Number of channels broadcasting in the UK 416 433 470 495 490 510 Source: Ofcom/broadcasters/Advertising Association/Warc/BARB/GfK. Note: Public funds include the DCMS grant to S4C and BBC funding that is allocated to TV; TV as a proportion of total advertising spend excludes direct mail and is based on Advertising Association/Warc Expenditure Report (www.warc.com/expenditurereport); spend on originations includes spend on nations and regions programming (not Welsh and Gaelic language programmes but some Irish language). Note that digital television take-up in Q1 2011 had reached 93%.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents
    TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents This report covers 238 international channels/networks across 152 major operators in 34 EMEA countries. From the total, 67 channels (28%) transmit in high definition (HD). The report shows the reader which international channels are carried by which operator – and which tier or package the channel appears on. The report allows for easy comparison between operators, revealing the gaps and showing the different tiers on different operators that a channel appears on. Published in September 2012, this 168-page electronically-delivered report comes in two parts: A 128-page PDF giving an executive summary, comparison tables and country-by-country detail. A 40-page excel workbook allowing you to manipulate the data between countries and by channel. Countries and operators covered: Country Operator Albania Digitalb DTT; Digitalb Satellite; Tring TV DTT; Tring TV Satellite Austria A1/Telekom Austria; Austriasat; Liwest; Salzburg; UPC; Sky Belgium Belgacom; Numericable; Telenet; VOO; Telesat; TV Vlaanderen Bulgaria Blizoo; Bulsatcom; Satellite BG; Vivacom Croatia Bnet Cable; Bnet Satellite Total TV; Digi TV; Max TV/T-HT Czech Rep CS Link; Digi TV; freeSAT (formerly UPC Direct); O2; Skylink; UPC Cable Denmark Boxer; Canal Digital; Stofa; TDC; Viasat; You See Estonia Elion nutitv; Starman; ZUUMtv; Viasat Finland Canal Digital; DNA Welho; Elisa; Plus TV; Sonera; Viasat Satellite France Bouygues Telecom; CanalSat; Numericable; Orange DSL & fiber; SFR; TNT Sat Germany Deutsche Telekom; HD+; Kabel
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Senate Enquiry Into Media Diversity in Australia The
    Submission on Senate enquiry into media diversity in Australia The state of media diversity, independence and reliability in Australia and the impact that this has on public interest journalism and democracy. DATE: 6TH DECEMBER 2020 MY BACKGROUND I am a retired business professional who has worked in the information technology and information industry all my working life. My roles have included technical, management, account management, regional sales management and worldwide product marketing. I have taken an interest is current affairs all of my life and am very cognisant of the technical capabilities of the internet and social media. MY SUBMISSION The greatest change to the media landscape in Australia over recent years is the influence of the internet and online media and advertising and the commensurate fall in advertising revenue in the traditional masthead newspapers. The arrival of Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media has changed the way users explore news, current affairs and other content of interest. The operational model of social media is to fund their business through advertising which extracts large sources of revenue from traditional media. This results in the need for commercial media to cut costs, change their business model, introduce paywalls requiring subscription to access media content, and merge into larger conglomerates. The other major media providers in Australia are the publicly funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and SBS. The internet and social media has not affected their funding source and has in fact increased their reach. The ABC receives over $1 Billion annually and is forever complaining about cuts, be they cuts in real terms or simply through a lack of inflation indexed cost increases.
    [Show full text]
  • What Public? Wayne Parsons (1995) Has Considered the Changing Use of the Term ‘Public’, and Suggests a Range of Terms in Common Use, Including
    This page intentionally left blank AN INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC POLICY THEORY AND PRACTICE Sarah Maddison and Richard Denniss An Introduction to Australian Public Policy: Theory and Practice is the fi rst book to comprehensively address both the theoretical and the practical aspects of policy making in Australia. Written in an accessible style, this text is designed to introduce students to the real world challenges and skills involved in working in a range of policy roles. Drawing on their own experiences, the authors ground public policy theory in a number of key controversies to illustrate the contestable nature of the policy process. Key economic concepts are explained in detail using plain language, paving the way for discussion about the main roles and responsibilities of policy making. Each chapter features case studies that outline contemporary policy issues, such as the deregulation of the fi nancial system, ‘Knowledge Nation’, paid maternity leave, and the Northern Territory intervention. Including practical exercises on how to write policy briefs and media releases, this book is essential reading for anyone who needs to know how public policy is developed in Australia. Sarah Maddison is Senior Associate Dean in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. Richard Denniss is Executive Director of the Australia Institute, a Canberra-based policy think tank, and Adjunct Associate Professor in the Crawford School of Economics and Government at the Australian National University. AN INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC POLICY THEORY AND PRACTICE Sarah Maddison Richard Denniss CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521705714 © Sarah Maddison & Richard Denniss 2009 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of IDEAS This Work Is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/V3.0)
    less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page i THE FUTURE OF IDEAS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/v3.0). Noncommercial uses are thus permitted without any further permission from the copyright owner. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are administered by Random House. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.randomhouse.com/about/ permissions.html The book maybe downloaded in electronic form (freely) at: http://the-future-of-ideas.com For more permission about Creative Commons licenses, go to: http://creativecommons.org less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iii the future of ideas THE FATE OF THE COMMONS IN A CONNECTED WORLD /// Lawrence Lessig f RANDOM HOUSE New York less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iv Copyright © 2001 Lawrence Lessig All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Random House and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Lessig, Lawrence. The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world / Lawrence Lessig. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-375-50578-4 1. Intellectual property. 2. Copyright and electronic data processing. 3. Internet—Law and legislation. 4. Information society. I. Title. K1401 .L47 2001 346.04'8'0285—dc21 2001031968 Random House website address: www.atrandom.com Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 24689753 First Edition Book design by Jo Anne Metsch less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page v To Bettina, my teacher of the most important lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]
  • A Day in the Life of Your Data
    A Day in the Life of Your Data A Father-Daughter Day at the Playground April, 2021 “I believe people are smart and some people want to share more data than other people do. Ask them. Ask them every time. Make them tell you to stop asking them if they get tired of your asking them. Let them know precisely what you’re going to do with their data.” Steve Jobs All Things Digital Conference, 2010 Over the past decade, a large and opaque industry has been amassing increasing amounts of personal data.1,2 A complex ecosystem of websites, apps, social media companies, data brokers, and ad tech firms track users online and offline, harvesting their personal data. This data is pieced together, shared, aggregated, and used in real-time auctions, fueling a $227 billion-a-year industry.1 This occurs every day, as people go about their daily lives, often without their knowledge or permission.3,4 Let’s take a look at what this industry is able to learn about a father and daughter during an otherwise pleasant day at the park. Did you know? Trackers are embedded in Trackers are often embedded Data brokers collect and sell, apps you use every day: the in third-party code that helps license, or otherwise disclose average app has 6 trackers.3 developers build their apps. to third parties the personal The majority of popular Android By including trackers, developers information of particular individ- and iOS apps have embedded also allow third parties to collect uals with whom they do not have trackers.5,6,7 and link data you have shared a direct relationship.3 with them across different apps and with other data that has been collected about you.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Digital on Screen Graphics Executive Sum M Ary
    Researching Digital On Screen Graphics Executive Sum m ary Background In Spring 2010, the BBC commissioned independent market research company, Ipsos MediaCT to conduct research into what the general public, across the UK thought of Digital On Screen Graphics (DOGs) – the channel logos that are often in the corner of the TV screen. The research was conducted between 5th and 11th March, with a representative sample of 1,031 adults aged 15+. The research was conducted by interviewers in-home, using the Ipsos MORI Omnibus. The key findings from the research can be found below. Key Findings Do viewers notice DOGs? As one of our first questions we split our sample into random halves and showed both halves a typical image that they would see on TV. One was a very busy image, with a DOG present in the top left corner, the other image had much less going on, again with the DOG in the top left corner. We asked respondents what the first thing they noticed was, and then we asked what they second thing they noticed was. It was clear from the results that the DOGs did not tend to stand out on screen, with only 12% of those presented with the ‘less busy’ screen picking out the DOG (and even fewer, 7%, amongst those who saw the busy screen). Even when we had pointed out DOGs and talked to respondents specifically about them, 59% agreed that they ‘tend not to notice the logos’, with females and viewers over 55, the least likely to notice them according to our survey.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting
    Heat treatment This is a list of greenhouse gas emitting companies and peak industry bodies and the firms they employ to lobby government. It is based on data from the federal and state lobbying registers.* Client Industry Lobby Company AGL Energy Oil and Gas Enhance Corporate Lobbyists registered with Enhance Lobbyist Background Limited Pty Ltd Corporate Pty Ltd* James (Jim) Peter Elder Former Labor Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development and Trade (Queensland) Kirsten Wishart - Michael Todd Former adviser to Queensland Premier Peter Beattie Mike Smith Policy adviser to the Queensland Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, LHMU industrial officer, state secretary to the NT Labor party. Nicholas James Park Former staffer to Federal Coalition MPs and Senators in the portfolios of: Energy and Resources, Land and Property Development, IT and Telecommunications, Gaming and Tourism. Samuel Sydney Doumany Former Queensland Liberal Attorney General and Minister for Justice Terence John Kempnich Former political adviser in the Queensland Labor and ACT Governments AGL Energy Oil and Gas Government Relations Lobbyists registered with Government Lobbyist Background Limited Australia advisory Pty Relations Australia advisory Pty Ltd* Ltd Damian Francis O’Connor Former assistant General Secretary within the NSW Australian Labor Party Elizabeth Waterland Ian Armstrong - Jacqueline Pace - * All lobbyists registered with individual firms do not necessarily work for all of that firm’s clients. Lobby lists are updated regularly. This
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Economic and Political Overview in Brisbane
    2019 Economic and Political Overview in Brisbane Thursday 14 February 2019, 10.00am to 2.00pm Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre EVENT MAJOR SPONSOR www.ceda.com.au morning agenda 10.00am Registration 10.15am Welcome Kyl Murphy State Director and Company Secretary, CEDA 10.25am Speaker address Michael Blythe Chief Economist and Managing Director, Economics, Commonwealth Bank of Australia 10.45am Speaker address Sara James, Journalist and author 11.00am Speaker address Peter van Onselen Journalist and Professor of Politics and Policy, Griffith Business School 11.15am Close of morning session Kyl Murphy State Director, CEDA . lunch agenda 11.55am Welcome (back) Kyl Murphy State Director and Company Secretary, CEDA 12.00pm Introduction Professor Nick James Executive Dean, Faculty of Law, Bond University 12.10pm Speaker address Professor Simon Jackman Chief Executive Officer, United States Studies Centre 12.25pm Speaker address Peter Varghese AO Chancellor, The University of Queensland 12.40pm Lunch 1.10pm Moderated discussion and questions Moderator: Melinda Cilento, Chief Executive, CEDA • Michael Blythe, Chief Economist and Managing Director, Economics, Commonwealth Bank of Australia • Professor Simon Jackman, Chief Executive Officer, United States Studies Centre • Sara James, Journalist and author • Peter van Onselen, Journalist and Professor of Politics and Policy, Griffith Business School • Peter Varghese AO, Chancellor, The University of Queensland 1.50pm Close Kyl Murphy CEDA will be tweeting from this State Director and Company Secretary, CEDA event using #EPO2019 Join the conversation and follow us on Twitter @ceda_news sponsor Event major sponsor Bond University A student experience powerfully focused on the individual. Our programs are geared towards inspiring students to achieve beyond their expectations - and to strive to pursue their dreams and aspirations.
    [Show full text]