DOCSLIB.ORG

Impartiality in Opinion Content (July 2008)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impartiality in Opinion Content (July 2008) Quality Assurance Project 5: Impartiality (Opinion Content) Final Report July 2008 Advise. Verify. Review ABC Editorial Policies Editorial Policies The Editorial Policies of the ABC are its leading standards and a day-to-day reference for makers of ABC content. The Editorial Policies – • give practical shape to statutory obligations in the ABC Act; • set out the ABC’s self-regulatory standards and how to enforce them; and • describe and explain to staff and the community the editorial and ethical principles fundamental to the ABC. The role of Director Editorial Policies was established in 2007 and comprises three main functions: to advise, verify and review. The verification function principally involves the design and implementation of quality assurance projects to allow the ABC to assess whether it is meeting the standards required of it and to contribute to continuous improvement of the national public broadcaster and its content. Acknowledgements The project gained from the sustained efforts of several people, and the Director Editorial Policies acknowledges: Denis Muller, Michelle Fisher, Manager Research, and Jessica List, Executive Assistant. Thanks also to Ian Carroll and John Cameron, respectively the Directors of the Innovation Division and the News Division, and to their senior staff, whose engagement over the details of editorial decision-making gave the project layers that an assessment of this sort usually lacks. This paper is published by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation © 2008 ABC For information about the paper, please contact: Director Editorial Policies ABC Southbank Centre GPO Box 9994 Melbourne VIC 3001 Phone: +61 3 9626 1631 Email: [email protected] QA Project 05 – Final Report July 2008 ABC Editorial Policies Foreword Opinion and impartiality – are there any other words which, when paired, are more fraught for a public broadcaster? Is any other pair of words more apparently paradoxical? Opinion content is commissioned or acquired by the ABC to provide a particular perspective or point of view. It relates to matters of contention and public debate. This project is the first to test section 6.6.3 of the 2007 Editorial Policies, the essence of which states – The ABC is committed to impartiality and must demonstrate this in its opinion content through the presentation of a diversity of perspectives. This requires a diversity of perspectives to be demonstrated across a network or platform by providing content of a similar type and weight in an appropriate time-frame. We looked at a sample of opinion content relating to a longstanding matter of contention in Australian public debate, the Apology. Two forums on the online platform were examined: Unleashed, which is run by the Innovation Division, and the Opinion (News Online) forum run by the News Division. The overall conclusion is that the test for impartiality was met, according to the methodology used. Significant questions emerged about the methodology itself, and about the wording of the relevant section of the Editorial Policies. The complexities of the seemingly docile term “appropriate time-frame” became clearer as the project progressed, and a specific section of this report examines them. The challenges inherent in the phrase “of a similar type and weight” speak for themselves throughout the report – in the data, the responses and findings, and in the methodology, which is reproduced in full at Appendix II. The project showed up the importance of the ABC’s striving for consistency in basic standards across the different Divisions. Content created in isolation by each Division tends nowadays to gather and mix on the online platform, and that trend will grow. Linking, a feature unique to the online platform – with no analogues in traditional print media or radio or TV broadcasting to provide guidance – proved complex and we sought the Divisions’ responses to initial data, considered them, then sought a second round of comments from the Divisions and considered them also in reaching our conclusion. Their full responses comprise Appendix III. More than the other quality assurance projects so far conducted under the 2007 Editorial Policies, this fifth project laid bare the significance of the changes being wrought by technology on the ABC, in common with all institutional media. Audiences are using media differently now. It means mass media are behaving differently, so methods for judging media can be expected to change. Unlike earlier times, the power of widespread and irrevocable disclosure is now in the hands of anyone with a suitable device connected to the internet. Media standards used to be predicated on the notion that only a few controlled the means by which they or their invitees spoke to the many. It used to be assumed that the many were especially influenced by the few who ran newspapers and broadcasting. Online life is expanding and quickening with broadband growth and other technological improvements. Online, the many can talk back to the few, or talk to each other on forums that the traditional media do not control. Or the many can obtain the undiluted opinions of those who are only summarised by the mass media, or perhaps do not appear in mass media at all. QA Project 05 – Final Report July 2008 ABC Editorial Policies These changes will force change to traditional thinking about media accountability. Traditionally, judgements about media performance have been pronouncements made after shrouded processes performed by persons of implied Olympian detachment. On matters of contention and public debate no one comes values-free and opinion-less to the task of judging media coverage. That much can be straightforwardly acknowledged. It nevertheless remains necessary for entities like the ABC to devise credible ways to assess whether they are meeting their standards, including standards for impartiality. In future, in the field of media accountability – as in other fields – judgement is likely to become less definitive, more iterative; not so much a solo act but a shared process. Judgements will draw on more information, media decision-makers will be asked to explain more and to clarify, and conclusions will be drawn more from what the many discuss than from what the few pronounce. Of course, judgements will still be made by those with particular responsibilities to make them, as I have in this context. But the enduring value of projects like this one will not be to provide an illusory definitiveness. Rather, they will provide necessary information, explanation and discussion. For these new processes to be credible as a means of accountability there must be transparency. This is essential if the processes are to have legitimacy among those who, in good faith, form different judgements on the basis of the same material. Those who form those different judgements should be able to see what was done and how it all was queried, explained and argued out. This should build their confidence in the process, even if it does not, to their way of thinking, make the conclusions right. The exchanges between reviewers and editors set out in this report open up institutional media decision- making in a way that, to my knowledge, it has not been opened up before in Australian media self- regulation. Rarely do editors account in public for their choices in the systematic way this project required it. In this sense, the ABC is again innovating (one of its statutory functions), this time in the field of media self-regulation. Mutually testing and mutually respectful interaction between the reviewers conducting the assessment and the editorial teams being assessed was of critical importance to what was learned during this project. Transparency is not easy, but for the ABC and the Australia that the ABC exists to serve, I believe it will be better than the comparatively opaque complain-inquire-pronounce method of media accountability that marks the past. In today’s and tomorrow’s media environment, especially in matters as contentious as judging impartiality, accountability increasingly consists of routine transparency and continuing engagement. PAUL CHADWICK Director Editorial Policies July 2008 QA Project 05 – Final Report July 2008 ABC Editorial Policies Quality Assurance Project 5 Impartiality (Opinion Content) – Final Report July 2008 Table of contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................................................1 II. Rationale, Objectives and Guiding Principles................................................................................2 A. Objective.........................................................................................................................................2 B. Guiding Principles...........................................................................................................................2 III. Methodology summarised................................................................................................................3 A. Scope..............................................................................................................................................3 B. Collection and analysis...................................................................................................................4 C. Reporting procedures .....................................................................................................................4 IV. Findings..............................................................................................................................................5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission on Senate Enquiry Into Media Diversity in Australia The
    Submission on Senate enquiry into media diversity in Australia The state of media diversity, independence and reliability in Australia and the impact that this has on public interest journalism and democracy. DATE: 6TH DECEMBER 2020 MY BACKGROUND I am a retired business professional who has worked in the information technology and information industry all my working life. My roles have included technical, management, account management, regional sales management and worldwide product marketing. I have taken an interest is current affairs all of my life and am very cognisant of the technical capabilities of the internet and social media. MY SUBMISSION The greatest change to the media landscape in Australia over recent years is the influence of the internet and online media and advertising and the commensurate fall in advertising revenue in the traditional masthead newspapers. The arrival of Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media has changed the way users explore news, current affairs and other content of interest. The operational model of social media is to fund their business through advertising which extracts large sources of revenue from traditional media. This results in the need for commercial media to cut costs, change their business model, introduce paywalls requiring subscription to access media content, and merge into larger conglomerates. The other major media providers in Australia are the publicly funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and SBS. The internet and social media has not affected their funding source and has in fact increased their reach. The ABC receives over $1 Billion annually and is forever complaining about cuts, be they cuts in real terms or simply through a lack of inflation indexed cost increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser Minister Critical of Turnbull's Rejection Of
    Fraser minister critical of Turnbull’s rejection of indigenous voice Former Aboriginal affairs minister Fred Chaney. • The Australian • 17January 2018 • Rick Morton Malcolm Turnbull and his government, in their swift rejection of a proposed indigenous voice to parliament, have either “misunderstood or misrepresented” the idea in a way that tried to “turn the clock backward,” the former Aboriginal affairs minister Fred Chaney said. Mr Chaney, a minister in the Fraser government and a deputy leader of the Liberal Party, said there was “confusion” in the government’s response to the Referendum Council’s recommendations on constitutional recognition. “I found the government’s response very troubling because it talked about equal citizenship, an idea this nation has already addressed with a previous referendum and full legal citizenship,” he said. Speaking particularly about an indigenous body that would act as a “voice” to parliament — something some Coalition MPs dismissed as a “third chamber of parliament” — Mr Chaney said it was a “generous” concession to constitutional conservatives. “Through this whole process, Aboriginal people have removed the logs in the path, this idea that there would be a bill of rights, that it would disturb the balance between the parliament and the courts, all of these things have been removed,” he said. 2 “All we are asking is for the specific existence and survival of Aboriginal people to be acknowledged. We essentially tried to annihilate them, to wipe their culture and language from the country, and they survived. It is a heroic story. This is a very gentle proposal … which would allow Aboriginal people to be heard on legislation that affects them.” • READ MORE • They were first — we should listen University of NSW professor of law and constitutional lawyer Megan Davis, who is also a Referendum Council member, said there had been a “fundamental misunderstanding” of the issue in government.
    [Show full text]
  • What Public? Wayne Parsons (1995) Has Considered the Changing Use of the Term ‘Public’, and Suggests a Range of Terms in Common Use, Including
    This page intentionally left blank AN INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC POLICY THEORY AND PRACTICE Sarah Maddison and Richard Denniss An Introduction to Australian Public Policy: Theory and Practice is the fi rst book to comprehensively address both the theoretical and the practical aspects of policy making in Australia. Written in an accessible style, this text is designed to introduce students to the real world challenges and skills involved in working in a range of policy roles. Drawing on their own experiences, the authors ground public policy theory in a number of key controversies to illustrate the contestable nature of the policy process. Key economic concepts are explained in detail using plain language, paving the way for discussion about the main roles and responsibilities of policy making. Each chapter features case studies that outline contemporary policy issues, such as the deregulation of the fi nancial system, ‘Knowledge Nation’, paid maternity leave, and the Northern Territory intervention. Including practical exercises on how to write policy briefs and media releases, this book is essential reading for anyone who needs to know how public policy is developed in Australia. Sarah Maddison is Senior Associate Dean in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales. Richard Denniss is Executive Director of the Australia Institute, a Canberra-based policy think tank, and Adjunct Associate Professor in the Crawford School of Economics and Government at the Australian National University. AN INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC POLICY THEORY AND PRACTICE Sarah Maddison Richard Denniss CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521705714 © Sarah Maddison & Richard Denniss 2009 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Edition
    NATIONAL COUNCIL of WOMEN WA Inc PATRON: Hon Kerry Sanderson AO VICE PATRON: Janet Davidson AOM JP PRESIDENT: Marion Ward SECRETARY: Helen McDonagh Act TREASURER: Sally Warner Rod Evans Community Centre 160 Hay St East Perth WA 6004 GPO Box 6224 East Perth 6892 Phone: 9325 8897 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncwwa.org.au President’s Message November 2014 Dear Members The COTA AGM was held at the State Library e and Mr. Fred Chaney gave the most interesting m ur year is drawing to a close and this will a address “Reinventing Aging”. Mr. Chaney felt i be our last newsletter for 2014. During that aging is a time of loss – loss of friends, ability l January you will receive an update on the : O to do all the things we have enjoyed in the past, arrangements for International Women’s Day so sometimes loss of memory. As usual his talk was n that we will have numbers in early for catering c thought provoking but with a great deal of humor. w purposes. You have already received your 2015 Marie Moloney was returned to the Board for a w calendar so you will be able to plan your year. further term of three years. Congratulation Marie! a @ Another of our wonderful women, volunteering i The highlight of this month has been the ANZAC i Commemoration for the departure of the many hours to assist in delivering service to n Expeditionary Forces from Albany one hundred others. e t years ago. Hopefully many of you were able to .
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting
    Heat treatment This is a list of greenhouse gas emitting companies and peak industry bodies and the firms they employ to lobby government. It is based on data from the federal and state lobbying registers.* Client Industry Lobby Company AGL Energy Oil and Gas Enhance Corporate Lobbyists registered with Enhance Lobbyist Background Limited Pty Ltd Corporate Pty Ltd* James (Jim) Peter Elder Former Labor Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development and Trade (Queensland) Kirsten Wishart - Michael Todd Former adviser to Queensland Premier Peter Beattie Mike Smith Policy adviser to the Queensland Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, LHMU industrial officer, state secretary to the NT Labor party. Nicholas James Park Former staffer to Federal Coalition MPs and Senators in the portfolios of: Energy and Resources, Land and Property Development, IT and Telecommunications, Gaming and Tourism. Samuel Sydney Doumany Former Queensland Liberal Attorney General and Minister for Justice Terence John Kempnich Former political adviser in the Queensland Labor and ACT Governments AGL Energy Oil and Gas Government Relations Lobbyists registered with Government Lobbyist Background Limited Australia advisory Pty Relations Australia advisory Pty Ltd* Ltd Damian Francis O’Connor Former assistant General Secretary within the NSW Australian Labor Party Elizabeth Waterland Ian Armstrong - Jacqueline Pace - * All lobbyists registered with individual firms do not necessarily work for all of that firm’s clients. Lobby lists are updated regularly. This
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis
    AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals .........................
    [Show full text]
  • CEU Political Science Journal
    Vol. 4, No. 2 April 2009 CEU Political Science Journal Department of Political Science Central European University CEU Political Science Journal Department of Political Science Central European University, Budapest April 2009 Advisory Board S.M. Amadae, Ohio State University Carol Harrington, Victoria University of Wellington Karen Henderson, University of Leicester Herbert Kitschelt, Duke University Cristian Pirvulescu, SNSPA Bucharest Phillippe C. Schmitter, EUI Florence Carsten Q. Schneider, CEU Budapest Jan Zielonka, University of Oxford Managing Editors Sergiu Gherghina, University of Leiden Arpad Todor, European University Institute, Florence Editorial Board Dorothee Bohle, CEU Budapest Andras Bozoki, CEU Budapest Anil Duman, CEU Budapest Enyedi Zsolt, CEU Budapest Robert Sata, CEU Budapest Stela Garaz, CEU Budapest Fouad Touzani, CEU Budapest Daniela Sirinic, CEU Budapest Jakub Parusinski, CEU Budapest Editorial Assistants Gabriela Borz, University of Birmingham Megan Thornton George Jiglau, Babes-Bolyai University Oana Lup, CEU Budapest Stefan Cibian, CEU Budapest CONTENTS ARTICLES Dylan Kissane Kevin07, web 2.0 and young voters at the 2007 Australian Federal elections 144 Christian W. Martin Towards An Explanation Of Electoral Rules Change 169 Mihail Chiru and Ionuţ Ciobanu Legislative Recruitment And Electoral System Change: The Case Of Romania 192 Ilir Kalemaj and Dorian Jano Authoritarianism In The Making? The Role Of Political Culture And Institutions In The Albanian Context 232 Dennis P. Patterson and Leslie Fadiga-Stewart
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Ray's Bitterness
    Sugar Ray's bitterness By Greg Roberts Sydney Morning Herald 5 October 2002 Rivalry over government funding and political power has spilled over into a nasty brawl in outback Queensland. Greg Roberts reports. ONE of Australia's most powerful Aboriginal leaders points to a patch of dry mulga scrub outside the south-west Queensland town of Charleville. "That's where I grew up as a kid; that's where the tin shed was," says "Sugar" Ray Robinson, deputy chairman of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC). "It had a dirt floor; eight of us lived there. We carted water in a bucket from a tap every day. We ate bread and water with sugar sprinkled on it. There wasn't a day went past that I wasn't hungry." Robinson, 56, has come a long way. Today he heads the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services Secretariat and 13 other indigenous bodies. A powerbroker in ATSIC, he is a constant thorn in the side of the commission chairman, Geoff Clark. Robinson predicts that after the October 19 ATSIC elections, Clark will no longer be chairman. "Geoff Clark has a problem and the problem is he is not going to get in as chairman while I'm there," he booms in his trademark gravelly voice. "He hasn't got the numbers. He knows that if he's ever to get back as chairman, I'm his biggest threat." Robinson insists he does not covet the top job. Clark infuriated Robinson recently when he called for an investigation into allegations against his deputy in a series of articles in Brisbane's The Courier-Mail newspaper.
    [Show full text]
  • 22. Gender and the 2013 Election: the Abbott 'Mandate'
    22. Gender and the 2013 Election: The Abbott ‘mandate’ Kirsty McLaren and Marian Sawer In the 2013 federal election, Tony Abbott was again wooing women voters with his relatively generous paid parental leave scheme and the constant sight of his wife and daughters on the campaign trail. Like Julia Gillard in 2010, Kevin Rudd was assuring voters that he was not someone to make an issue of gender and he failed to produce a women’s policy. Despite these attempts to neutralise gender it continued to be an undercurrent in the election, in part because of the preceding replacement of Australia’s first woman prime minister and in part because of campaigning around the gender implications of an Abbott victory. To evaluate the role of gender in the 2013 election, we draw together evidence on the campaign, campaign policies, the participation of women, the discursive positioning of male leaders and unofficial gender-based campaigning. We also apply a new international model of the dimensions of male dominance in the old democracies and the stages through which such dominance is overcome. We argue that, though feminist campaigning was a feature of the campaign, traditional views on gender remain powerful. Raising issues of gender equality, as Julia Gillard did in the latter part of her prime ministership, is perceived as electorally damaging, particularly among blue-collar voters. The prelude to the election Gender received most attention in the run-up to the election in 2012–13 rather than during the campaign itself. Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s famous misogyny speech of 2012 was prompted in immediate terms by the Leader of the Opposition drawing attention to sexism in what she perceived as a hypocritical way.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review
    Response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review Tuesday, 7 September 2010 INTRODUCTION This paper is written in response to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts’ (DEWHA) Issues Paper, Indigenous Broadcasting and Media Sector Review (the Review). The structure of FOXTEL’s response is as follows: 1. Overview of FOXTEL’s business and reconciliation activity 2. Relevant background including: - The rise of the digital economy - Indigenous broadcasting and the digital economy 3. Policy recommendations re NITV including covering: - Importance of independence, certainty and adequate funding for NITV - Free to air broadcast of NITV and the Digital Dividend - Training and skills development For further information on this submission, please contact: Mr Adam Suckling Director, Policy & Corporate Affairs FOXTEL E: [email protected] P: 02 9813 6140 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The rise of the digital economy – including lower production and distribution costs, increased consumer empowerment and the demand for greater channel choice – mean that it is more economically feasible to produce and distribute channels such as NITV, and also to find audiences who are interested in programming such as NITV’s, than it ever has been. While such developments in the digital economy make it possible to provide, and find audiences for a channel such as NITV, there are also political, cultural and social reasons why NITV should continue to be funded on a sustainable basis and maintain an independent editorial voice and governance: Cultural – Indigenous Australians have over 40,000 years of cultural development as well as distinct and multiple perspectives on contemporary Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcondon.Apology.Feb0
    The Hardest Word Author: Matthew Condon QWeekend Magazine (Brisbane, Australia) - Courier Mail Saturday, February 7, 2009 Was Kevin Rudd's "sorry" speech an act of heartfelt reconciliation or an empty gesture? One year on, Qweekend asks 14 indigenous Australians. To read it now, one year on, it no longer contains the fire glow of its initial delivery, nor does it make its way so directly to the human heart, removed from its astonishing emotional context on that morning of February 13 last year. But Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's now famous "sorry" speech to Australia's Stolen Generations, his first major act of parliamentary business as leader of the nation, remains a significant specimen of political rhetoric. Flat on the page it continues to show life because we can still readily connect it to the memory of that cloudy Canberra day, and how the nation stopped in the manner of great sporting events or great tragedy. More than 1.3 million Australians watched Rudd read the speech live on television. Thousands of indigenous Australians converged on the capital, filling the House of Representatives visitors' gallery and spilling outside. As Australians, we are largely unused to witnessing first-hand the making of history, unless it comes from the blade of a cricket bat or the lunging head of a horse. Here we would be spectators to something as intangible, yet as elementary, as an apology from one group of human beings to another. Here, at nine o'clock on a Wednesday morning in late summer, a prime minister would open the 42nd Parliament of the Commonwealth by attempting to build a metaphorical bridge between white and black Australians using words alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Robson on Toowoomba Mosque by Frank Robson
    SBS report by Frank Robson on Toowoomba Mosque https://www.sbs.com.au/topics/life/feature/garden-city-burning-who-set-mosque-fire By Frank Robson Grainy CCTV shows the man police believe set fire to a mosque – twice. Who is the arsonist targeting Toowoomba’s Muslim community? Published August 3, 2016. Reading time: 20 mins On a cold and starry night during the holy month of Ramadan, wind whistles through the fire-damaged timbers of Toowoomba’s Garden City Mosque. Once a Christian church, the brick and timber chapel with its distinctive arched roof became the city’s first mosque amid much rejoicing early in 2014. CCTV released by Queensland Police shows the suspected arsonist. At the time, there were predictions “10,000 rednecks” would oppose the mosque, set on a large corner block in a leafy residential suburb near the CBD. But it didn’t happen. Apart from some neighbours' complaints over parking problems, and a few obscenities shouted from passing vehicles, peace and harmony prevailed in the Darling Downs city once described as “the buckle on Queensland’s Bible belt”. Then, in January and April last year, the mosque in West Street, Harristown, was hit by two still unsolved arson attacks. The first, in a wooden outbuilding, did little damage. But the second effectively destroyed the interior of the mosque, rendering it unusable. Both fires were deliberately lit between 1am and 2am, probably by the same person, but despite an ongoing investigation, police admit they’re no closer to making an arrest than when they began. Imam of Garden City Mosque, Abdul Kader, explains what happened.
    [Show full text]