DOCSLIB.ORG

A Selective Glossary of Nineteenth Century Fortification Terms 77

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Last A Selective Glossary of Nineteenth Century Fortification Terms 77 A Selective Glossary of Nineteenth Century Fortification Terms Joseph H. Last This glossary is provided to assist readers who might be unfamiliar with nineteenth century military terms. Engineers developed a specialized vocabulary over a period of four centuries to describe elements of defen- sive works. Armed with a common language, military engineers could effectively convey their ideas regard- ing modifications and improvements in fort design. Consisting of Italian, French, and English expressions, the terminology illustrates the lineage of fortification theory, highlights the preoccupation with defence-in- depth, and identifies the primary countries that made the business of nineteenth century fortifications both an art and a science. Introduction Selective Glossary Nineteenth century fortifications were the prod- Advanced Works: Additional works beyond the uct of a four-hundred-year process pitting glacis, but near enough to receive protection advancements in ordnance against improvements from the main fortifications. They are designed in fort design and materials (Arnold 2002). to force an enemy to begin a siege from a great Evolving from the fortified keep into subter- distance, and to cover parts of the ground not ranean works of reinforced concrete, forts were easily seen from the main parapets (Hughes the offspring of art and science. By the 1991:241; Saunders 1989:246). Renaissance, the business of fortification design Armourer: A maker and repairer of arms or required much more than the influence of mon- armour (Barber 2004:71). archs and lords. It demanded specialized theo- Banquette: A raised ledge, sometimes stepped, at rists, engineers, and a technical vocabulary. the base of the parapet of the rampart on which Knowledge of fortifications and elements of troops stand when firing upon attacking forces defence was once an essential facet of a gentle- (also known as the firing step) (Hogg 1977:155; man’s education (Herman 1992:7). Today, our Herman 1992:175). reliance on missiles and flight technology has all Barbette: Raised platform allowing mounted but erased the need for permanent fortifications. guns to fire over the parapet en barbette (without Gone too is the pedestrian knowledge of forts the need for embrasures) (Farwell 2001:79). A and their defensive components. breastwork of a battery that is sufficiently low to This selective glossary is thus intended to assist permit fire without the use of embrasures twenty-first century readers unfamiliar with (Saunders 1989:246). nineteenth century fortification terms. The defi- Bastion: Projection from the general outline of a nitions employed are a collective amalgamation fortress from which the garrison can defend the gleaned from several sources on the subject ground before the ramparts by flanking fire. From (Duffy 1975:183-186; Herman 1992:175-185; the mid-sixteenth century on, a bastion refers to a Hogg 1977:155-158; Hughes 1991:241-248; four-sided projection consisting of two faces and Saunders 1989:246-249). Derived from Italian, two flanks (Duffy 1975:183; Saunders 1989:246). French, and the English language, the vocabulary Barracks: A purpose-built structure providing per- reflects contemporary spheres of influence and manent or semi-permanent accommodation for underscores the geographical/political arenas soldiers. Barracks can be free-standing or incorpo- where “model” fortifications were conceived, rated into casemated ramparts (Douet 1998:1; developed, and nurtured. Farwell 2001:81). 78 Ontario Archaeology No. 76, 2003 Battery: Any place, permanent or temporary, salient angle toward the country. A demi-lune is where guns or mortars are mounted. The sometimes referred to as a ravelin (Herman emplacement usually consists or a parapet and 1992:179; Saunders 1989:246). defensive ditch (Duffy 1975:183; Saunders Ditch: A wide, deep trench surrounding a defen- 1989:246). sive work, either wet or dry. Often excavated to Blast Wall: A free-standing masonry wall designed provide building material for the ramparts and to to reflect the blast from an explosion. Blast walls present a serious obstacle to an attacker (Hughes are often associated with powder magazines. 1991:243). Blockhouse: A small fortified work constructed Embrasure: An opening cut through a parapet of heavy timber or masonry and consisting of or wall through which cannon or other guns one or more rooms fitted with loopholes to per- could be fired. The sides or cheeks of the embra- mit defensive fire in various directions. Normally sure are flared outward to protect defenders while a small, detached work situated to guard an iso- offering a broader sweep or range of fire (Hogg lated point against raids (Saunders 1989:246). 1977:156; Hughes 1991:243). Breastwork: Similar to a parapet but also thrown En Barbette: A gun or battery is said to be en up along entrenchments to provide shelter and barbette when it is placed so as to fire over a low protection to defending troops (Hogg 1977:155) parapet without embrasure (Duffy 1975:183; Caponnière: A casemated work projecting per- Hogg 1977:155). pendicularly across a ditch for the purpose of Enceinte: The main body or area of a fort as delivering flanking or enfilade fire. Also covered defined by the outline of the ramparts excluding passage constructed across a ditch, sometimes outworks (Herman 1992:179; Hughes 1991:243). with loopholes for muskets or rifles, intended to Enfilade Fire: Fire directed along the length of a provide sheltered communication with the out- fortification or a body of troops (also known as works (Hughes 1991:241; Saunders 1989:246). flanking fire) (Herman 1992:179). Canteen: A shop selling necessities or liquor in Face (of a bastion): The exposed, outer wall of barracks or camp (Barber 2004:224; Farwell the bastion forming the salient angle projecting 2001:161). towards “the country” (Hogg 1977:156). Casemates: A bombproof vaulted chamber built Flank (of a bastion): The portion of the bastion in the thickness of the ramparts to permit artillery lying between its face and adjoining curtain wall fire, or to provide storage or barrack accommoda- (Hughes 1991:244). tion (Hogg 1977:155; Hughes 1991:241). Glacis: A natural or person-made slope descend- Coupe de main: A sudden vigorous attack ing from the crest of the ditch towards “the coun- (Barber 2004:347). try,” the purpose of which was to expose the Counterscarp: The outer face or slope of the attacker and to provide defenders with a clear ditch below the glacis. The side of the ditch clos- fire. Since much labour went into the contouring est to “the country” and the besieging force of the glacis, they are normally found only (Hogg 1977:156; Saunders 1989:246). around permanent fortifications (Herman Curtain Wall: The main wall or rampart of a 1992:179). defensive work, lying between two bastions, tow- Gorge: The neck, or rear face (either open or ers, or gates (Herman 1992:179). closed) of a bastion or other work (Herman Demi-Bastion: A work with one face and one 1992:179; Saunders 1989:249). flank. Half the entrance to a bastion measured Guardhouse: A building used to accommodate a from the angle of its adjoining curtain. A work military guard or to detain prisoners (Barber resembling one half of a bastion (Hughes 2004:670). 1991:243). Keep: A stronghold within a fort and the final Demi-lune: A detached work constructed to point of defence. A keep often refers to the main cover the curtain and the shoulders of the bas- castle tower (Hogg 1977:157; Saunders tion. It was composed of two faces forming a 1989:247). Last A Selective Glossary of Nineteenth Century Fortification Terms 79 Loophole: A long, narrow opening in a parapet Redoubt: A closed, independent work of square or wall to provide for vision and allow small arm or polygonal trace, without bastions. Usually, a fire (Farwell 2001:504). redoubt had little or no means of flanking Martello Tower: A British coastal tower, conical in defence. Redoubts commonly form a chain of shape, mounting guns on its terreplein and bar- detached works designed to support each other racks for the gun crew. Its design was inspired by a (Hogg 1977:158; Hughes 1991:247). Corsican work that withstood a naval encounter Reverse Fire Chamber: A work (casemate or and a two-day investment of 1400 men before its passage) constructed behind the counterscarp 32-man garrison surrendered (Clements 1999:10- from which the ditch could be enfiladed with 16; Hughes 1991:246; Grimsley 1998:13-15). reverse fire (Herman 1992:178). A reverse fire Moat: Common usage for a ditch. A deep, defen- chamber is also called a Counterscarp Gallery. sive trench enveloping the work (Hogg 1977:157). Ricochet Fire: The method of firing by which Palisade: A series of wooden posts, close-set and the projectile is made to glance or bounce along pointed, driven into the earth and used as an the length of a work (Saunders 1989:249). obstacle or barricade about a defensive position. Rifling: Technique of cutting spiral grooves into Palisades are normally positioned within a defen- the bore of the barrel of artillery and firearms, sive ditch to delay assault and act as an antiper- resulting in greater accuracy and distance of the sonnel device (Hughes 1991:247). projectile (Farwell 2001:698). Parade: The ground on which regular musters Salient: An angle pointing outwards toward the and exercises are held (Saunders 1989:249). field or country, such as the apex of a bastion Parapet: A stout wall or earthen breastwork, (Saunders 1989:249). crowning the rampart, providing shelter and pro- Scarp: The slope or face of the rampart from tection to defending troops (Hogg 1977:156; below the parapet to the bottom of the ditch. Saunders 1989:249).
Recommended publications
  • The Northgate Reconstruction

    The Northgate Reconstruction

    131 7 THE NORTHGATE RECONSTRUCTION P Holder and J Walker INTRODUCTION have come from the supposedly ancient quarries at Collyhurst some few kilometres north-east of the The Unit was asked to provide advice and fort. As this source was not available, Hollington assistance to Manchester City Council so that the Red Sandstone from Staffordshire was used to form City could reconstruct the Roman fort wall and a wall of coursed facing blocks 200-320 mm long by defences at Manchester as they would have appeared 140-250 mm deep by 100-120 mm thick. York stone around the beginning of the 3rd century (Phase 4). was used for paving, steps and copings. A recipe for the right type of mortar, which consisted of This short report has been included in the volume three parts river sand, three parts building sand, in order that a record of the archaeological work two parts lime and one part white cement, was should be available for visitors to the site. obtained from Hampshire County Council. The Ditches and Roods The Wall and Rampart The Phase 4a (see Chapter 4, Area B) ditches were Only the foundations and part of the first course re-establised along their original line to form a of the wall survived (see Chapter 4, Phase 4, Area defensive circuit consisting of an outer V-shaped A). The underlying foundations consisted of ditch in front of a smaller inner ditch running interleaved layers of rammed clay and river close to the fort wall. cobble. On top of the foundations of the fort wall lay traces of a chamfered plinth (see Chapter 5g) There were three original roads; the main road made up of large red sandstone blocks, behind from the Northgate that ran up to Deansgate, the which was a rough rubble backing.
  • Galway City Walls Conservation, Management and Interpretation Plan

    Galway City Walls Conservation, Management and Interpretation Plan

    GALWAY CITY WALLS CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT & INTERPRETATION PLAN MARCH 2013 Frontispiece- Woman at Doorway (Hall & Hall) Howley Hayes Architects & CRDS Ltd. were commissioned by Galway City Coun- cil and the Heritage Council to prepare a Conservation, Management & Interpre- tation Plan for the historic town defences. The surveys on which this plan are based were undertaken in Autumn 2012. We would like to thank all those who provided their time and guidance in the preparation of the plan with specialist advice from; Dr. Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Dr. Kieran O’Conor, Dr. Jacinta Prunty & Mr. Paul Walsh. Cover Illustration- Phillips Map of Galway 1685. CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 6 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 17 4.0 ASSESSMENT & STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 28 5.0 DEFINING ISSUES & VULNERABILITY 31 6.0 CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES 35 7.0 INTERPRETATION & MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES 37 8.0 CONSERVATION STRATEGIES 41 APPENDICES Statutory Protection 55 Bibliography 59 Cartographic Sources 60 Fortification Timeline 61 Endnotes 65 1.0 INTRODUCTION to the east, which today retains only a small population despite the ambitions of the Anglo- Norman founders. In 1484 the city was given its charter, and was largely rebuilt at that time to leave a unique legacy of stone buildings The Place and carvings from the late-medieval period. Galway City is situated on the north-eastern The medieval street pattern has largely been shore of a sheltered bay on the west coast of preserved, although the removal of the walls Ireland. It is located at the mouth of the River during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Corrib, which separates the east and western together with extra-mural developments as the sides of the county.
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142

    The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142

    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
  • Ocm06220211.Pdf

    Ocm06220211.Pdf

    THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS--- : Foster F__urcO-lo, Governor METROP--�-��OLITAN DISTRICT COM MISSION; - PARKS DIVISION. HISTORY AND MASTER PLAN GEORGES ISLAND AND FORT WARREN 0 BOSTON HARBOR John E. Maloney, Commissioner Milton Cook Charles W. Greenough Associate Commissioners John Hill Charles J. McCarty Prepared By SHURCLIFF & MERRILL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL CONSULTANT MINOR H. McLAIN . .. .' MAY 1960 , t :. � ,\ �:· !:'/,/ I , Lf; :: .. 1 1 " ' � : '• 600-3-60-927339 Publication of This Document Approved by Bernard Solomon. State Purchasing Agent Estimated cost per copy: $ 3.S2e « \ '< � <: .' '\' , � : 10 - r- /16/ /If( ��c..c��_c.� t � o� rJ 7;1,,,.._,03 � .i ?:,, r12··"- 4 ,-1. ' I" -po �� ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to acknowledge with thanks the assistance, information and interest extended by Region Five of the National Park Service; the Na­ tional Archives and Records Service; the Waterfront Committee of the Quincy-South Shore Chamber of Commerce; the Boston Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy; Lieutenant Commander Preston Lincoln, USN, Curator of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion; Mr. Richard Parkhurst, former Chairman of Boston Port Authority; Brigardier General E. F. Periera, World War 11 Battery Commander at Fort Warren; Mr. Edward Rowe Snow, the noted historian; Mr. Hector Campbel I; the ABC Vending Company and the Wilson Line of Massachusetts. We also wish to thank Metropolitan District Commission Police Captain Daniel Connor and Capt. Andrew Sweeney for their assistance in providing transport to and from the Island. Reproductions of photographic materials are by George M. Cushing. COVER The cover shows Fort Warren and George's Island on January 2, 1958.
  • The Star Fort, September, 1814

    The Star Fort, September, 1814

    D-JLJ- UNITED STATES DEPARTHEI'irrr OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE BALTIMORE 30, MARYLAND \\St ARtftlOlOGY The .Star Fort, September, 1814 Prepared by: Dr. W. Richard Walsh Contract Historian · Georgetown University Georgetown, D.C. November, 1958 r~ , .. I . ,. .. - •• '' I• ,•' --:• ' . '·· ~ -,, .. ., . · .· .. :· .·. • , :: .:'~ .: :/ F.1 _r1 .. .J '~ l. \ '. \~ IJ li :i. /:i1('fl ---. \J .. •• 1 : ... .. .. .. ,,.. - l ~ j Table of Contents Page Frontispiece ••••••••••••••• • • • • ii I. Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 II. The Star Fort, September 12-14, 1814 • • • • • • • 7 24 III. Conclusions. • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • ._: I f ,\ .. i ) ~ ',...___/ Errata p .. 2, line 60 '0 indiaten should read '0 indicate.io p. 3, line 4o "war-fare" should read 10 warfareo 18 p. a, line 8. "amatuer" should read "amateur.~ p .. 7, fn. 1, line 5. "principle" should read ~principal." p. 9, line 12. "wa.tteries" should read "batteries. ~ p. 10, · line 10. Delete "which." p .. 10, line 11. "patforms" should read "platforms." p. 10, line 17. "Descius" should read "Decius." p. 13, fn. \:1 9 line 5. "Jessup" should read "Jesupn in this and all subsequent mention of the name. o. 19, line 16~ "orciinarilly" should read "ordinarily .. '° p. 26, line 5. "Carrol" should read "Carroll." p. 26, line 7. "confederates" should read "Confederates." .a- -. ( ... ~ "'·. / I Introduction In 1776, Baltimore prepared itself for. attack by the British~ Already apprehensive because of threats from the sea by His Majesty's vessel, the Otter, the Committee of Safety choose Whetstone Point as the best fortifiable site against enemy destruction to the Baltimore harbor. A fort of sorts was therefore erected, but because the threat of a general naval attack never materialized and the actual fight­ ing of the war of the Revolution by-passed Baltimoreans, a well armed Fort vVhetstone was not accomplished.
  • 1 Coast Artillery Living History Fort

    1 Coast Artillery Living History Fort

    Coast Artillery Living History Fort Hancock, NJ On 20-22 May 2016, the National Park Service (NPS) conducted the annual spring Coast Defense and Ocean Fun Day (sponsored by New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium – (http://njseagrant.org/) in conjunction with the Army Ground Forces Association (AGFA) and other historic and scientific organizations. Coast Defense Day showcases Fort Hancock’s rich military heritage thru tours and programs at various locations throughout the Sandy Hook peninsula – designated in 1982 as “The Fort Hancock and Sandy Hook Proving Ground National Historic Landmark”. AGFA concentrates its efforts at Battery Gunnison/New Peck, which from February to May 1943 was converted from a ‘disappearing’ battery to a barbette carriage gun battery. The members of AGFA who participated in the event were Doug Ciemniecki, Donna Cusano, Paul Cusano, Chris Egan, Francis Hayes, Doug Houck, Richard King, Henry and Mary Komorowski, Anne Lutkenhouse, Eric Meiselman, Tom Minton, Mike Murray, Kyle Schafer, Paul Taylor, Gary Weaver, Shawn Welch and Bill Winslow. AGFA guests included Paul Casalese, Erika Frederick, Larry Mihlon, Chris Moore, Grace Natsis, Steve Rossi and Anthony Valenti. The event had three major components: (1) the Harbor Defense Lantern Tour on Friday evening; (2) the Fort Hancock Historic Hike on Saturday afternoon and (3) Coastal Defense Day on Sunday, which focused on Battery Gunnison/New Peck operations in 1943, in conjunction with Ocean Fun Day. The educational objective was to provide interpretation of the Coast Artillery mission at Fort Hancock in the World War Two-era with a focus on the activation of two 6” rapid fire M1900 guns at New Battery Peck (formerly Battery Gunnison).
  • 6-Ingh Barbette . Carriage Model of 1910

    6-Ingh Barbette . Carriage Model of 1910

    1073 1073 • SERVICE HANDBOOK_ OF THE 6-INGH BARBETTE . CARRIAGE MODEL OF 1910 FOR 6-INCH GU- NO MODEL OF 1908 Mu PREPARED IN THE OFFICE Of' THE CHIEF OF ORDNANCE May, 1923 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 1073 1073 SERVICE HANDBOOK OF THE 6-INCH BARBFYFFE CAR IAGH MODEL OF 1910 FOR 6-INCH GUNS MODEL OF 1908 Mil PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ORDNANCE May, 1921 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 WAR DEPARTMENT Document No. 1073 Office of The Adjutant General NOTE.-This document supersedes Ordnance Pamphlet No. 1713. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, May 31,1921. The following publication, entitled "Service Handbook of the 6-inch Barbette Carriage, Model of 1910 for 6-inch Guns, Model of 1908 Mu," is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. • [062.1, A. G. O.] BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF WAR: PEYTON C. MARCH, Major General, Chiqfof Staff: OFFICIAL: P. C. HARRIS, The Adjutant General. (3) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. 6 List of plates 7 General description 7 Emplacement 7 The carriage 7 Principal parts 7 Pedestal Pivot yoke 8 Cradle 9. Recoil and counterrecoil system 10 Gunner's platforms 10 Elevating mechanism 10 Range disk 11 Traversing mechanism 12 Sight 12 Shield and supports 12 Gas-ejector system 13 Electrical fittings, cables, and wiring 14 Lighting circuits 15 The firing circuits 15 Shot trucks 16 Shot barrows 16 Instructions for assembling the carriage 19 Care of the carriage Generalinstructions 19 Oil holes 19 20 To pack a stuffing box 20 Instructions for cleaning recoil cylinders 21 Approximate weight of principal parts of carriage 22 List of articles packed in armament chest List of parts 23 (5) LIST OF PLATES.
  • The Dutch Wars of Independence and the Republic's Golden Age C.1570-C

    The Dutch Wars of Independence and the Republic's Golden Age C.1570-C

    The Dutch Wars of Independence and the Republic’s Golden Age c.1570-c.1680 Marjolein C. ’t Hart University of Amsterdam [email protected] 1 Contents Introduction – The Dutch Revolt, the Global Context, and the Military Revolution Interpretations of the Dutch Revolt The Military Revolution and its Societal Impact Warfare, Territorial State Formation, and Capital Accumulation About this Book Chapter 1 - The Wars: from the Dutch Revolt to ‘la Guerre de Hollande’, c. 1570-c.1680 The Dutch Revolt and the Struggle for Survival, 1570s-1580s Respite and Consolidation in the 1590s Stalemate and Truce, 1600-1621 Frederick Henry’s Counteroffensive and the Renewed Stalemate, 1620s-1640s Independence, the Stadholderless period, and the Wars with England and Munster 1672: The Year of Disaster and its Aftermath Conclusion: The Different Strategies of the Belligerents Chapter 2 – A Professional Military Force in the Making From Beggars and Landsknechts to a Standing Profeesional Army Pay, Mustering, Medical Care and the Prisoners of War Appointment of Officers and Decreasing Professionalization after 1648 Conclusion: Civilian Control over the Army Chapter 3 – The Dutch “Schoole of War”: Drill, Tactics, and Siege Warfare Increasing Standardization and the Proportion of Firearms Regular Exercises and New Formations Fortresses and Fortifications The Art of Siege Warfare Tactical Limits, Provisioning, and Army Size Conclusion: The Model of a Disciplined Army Chapter 4 – Garrisons and Civic Communities: Strengthening the Local Bonds The Difficult Start in
  • Fish Terminologies

    Fish Terminologies

    FISH TERMINOLOGIES Monument Type Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: Classification of monument type records by function.
  • Isurium Brigantum

    Isurium Brigantum

    Isurium Brigantum an archaeological survey of Roman Aldborough The authors and publisher wish to thank the following individuals and organisations for their help with this Isurium Brigantum publication: Historic England an archaeological survey of Roman Aldborough Society of Antiquaries of London Thriplow Charitable Trust Faculty of Classics and the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge Chris and Jan Martins Rose Ferraby and Martin Millett with contributions by Jason Lucas, James Lyall, Jess Ogden, Dominic Powlesland, Lieven Verdonck and Lacey Wallace Research Report of the Society of Antiquaries of London No. 81 For RWS Norfolk ‒ RF Contents First published 2020 by The Society of Antiquaries of London Burlington House List of figures vii Piccadilly Preface x London W1J 0BE Acknowledgements xi Summary xii www.sal.org.uk Résumé xiii © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2020 Zusammenfassung xiv Notes on referencing and archives xv ISBN: 978 0 8543 1301 3 British Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to this study 1 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data 1.2 Geographical setting 2 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the 1.3 Historical background 2 Library of Congress, Washington DC 1.4 Previous inferences on urban origins 6 The moral rights of Rose Ferraby, Martin Millett, Jason Lucas, 1.5 Textual evidence 7 James Lyall, Jess Ogden, Dominic Powlesland, Lieven 1.6 History of the town 7 Verdonck and Lacey Wallace to be identified as the authors of 1.7 Previous archaeological work 8 this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
  • Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne

    FORTIFICATION RENAISSANCE: THE ROMAN ORIGINS OF THE TRACE ITALIENNE Robert T. Vigus Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Co-Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Co-Chair Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Vigus, Robert T. Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne. Master of Arts (History), May 2013, pp.71, 35 illustrations, bibliography, 67 titles. The Military Revolution thesis posited by Michael Roberts and expanded upon by Geoffrey Parker places the trace italienne style of fortification of the early modern period as something that is a novel creation, borne out of the minds of Renaissance geniuses. Research shows, however, that the key component of the trace italienne, the angled bastion, has its roots in Greek and Roman writing, and in extant constructions by Roman and Byzantine engineers. The angled bastion of the trace italienne was yet another aspect of the resurgent Greek and Roman culture characteristic of the Renaissance along with the traditions of medicine, mathematics, and science. The writings of the ancients were bolstered by physical examples located in important trading and pilgrimage routes. Furthermore, the geometric layout of the trace italienne stems from Ottoman fortifications that preceded it by at least two hundred years. The Renaissance geniuses combined ancient bastion designs with eastern geometry to match a burgeoning threat in the rising power of the siege cannon. Copyright 2013 by Robert T. Vigus ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and encouragement of many people.
  • Coastal Adaptation Stategies: Case Studies (Chapter 5)

    Coastal Adaptation Stategies: Case Studies (Chapter 5)

    Case Study 5: Strategic Planning and Responsible Investments for Threatened Historic Structures, Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida Contributing Authors: Dan Kimball (Everglades / Dry Tortugas National Parks, retired), Marcy Rockman (NPS Climate Change Response Program), and Kelly Clark (Dry Tortugas National Park) Goals Sea level rise and increased tropical storm intensity pose a serious risk to the long-term sustainability of historic Fort Jefferson at Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida. The park is trying to mitigate these effects over time through strategic planning, informed decision making, and responsible investments that consider historical integrity and long-term sustainability of the fort and island on which it was built. Historic Fort Jefferson is a six-sided structure built on a landform that is impacted by coastal processes. Image credit: Marcy Rockman, NPS. Challenges and Needs Located 110 km (70 mi) west of Key West, Florida, in the Gulf of Mexico, the seven small islands and historic Fort Jefferson of Dry Tortugas National Park sit on the front lines of the climate change discussion and decision-making process within the National Park Service. The most pressing climate change issues that could directly affect the resources and operations of Dry Tortugas National Park are sea level rise and increased tropical storm intensity. These two factors pose a serious risk to long-term sustainability of Fort Jefferson, the main cultural resource and the base of all park operations, as well as the other islands and accompanying natural resources of the park. For more than 165 years, Fort Jefferson on Garden Key has exhibited incredible resilience to storms and the marine environment of the Dry Tortugas.