Ocm06220211.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ocm06220211.Pdf THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS--- : Foster F__urcO-lo, Governor METROP--�-��OLITAN DISTRICT COM MISSION; - PARKS DIVISION. HISTORY AND MASTER PLAN GEORGES ISLAND AND FORT WARREN 0 BOSTON HARBOR John E. Maloney, Commissioner Milton Cook Charles W. Greenough Associate Commissioners John Hill Charles J. McCarty Prepared By SHURCLIFF & MERRILL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL CONSULTANT MINOR H. McLAIN . .. .' MAY 1960 , t :. � ,\ �:· !:'/,/ I , Lf; :: .. 1 1 " ' � : '• 600-3-60-927339 Publication of This Document Approved by Bernard Solomon. State Purchasing Agent Estimated cost per copy: $ 3.S2e « \ '< � <: .' '\' , � : 10 - r- /16/ /If( ��c..c��_c.� t � o� rJ 7;1,,,.._,03 � .i ?:,, r12··"- 4 ,-1. ' I" -po �� ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to acknowledge with thanks the assistance, information and interest extended by Region Five of the National Park Service; the Na­ tional Archives and Records Service; the Waterfront Committee of the Quincy-South Shore Chamber of Commerce; the Boston Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy; Lieutenant Commander Preston Lincoln, USN, Curator of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion; Mr. Richard Parkhurst, former Chairman of Boston Port Authority; Brigardier General E. F. Periera, World War 11 Battery Commander at Fort Warren; Mr. Edward Rowe Snow, the noted historian; Mr. Hector Campbel I; the ABC Vending Company and the Wilson Line of Massachusetts. We also wish to thank Metropolitan District Commission Police Captain Daniel Connor and Capt. Andrew Sweeney for their assistance in providing transport to and from the Island. Reproductions of photographic materials are by George M. Cushing. COVER The cover shows Fort Warren and George's Island on January 2, 1958. Gallop's Island is in the distance. The photograph was taken by J. T. O'Toole of the Massachusetts National Guard. .. .. ; .. :. ... : ··.� . ... .. , ,. .. , . .• >. , . ' ,. .. ,• : ·:.. IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY LIST AND COST ESTIMATE ITEM ill 2nd 3rd 4th 1 Building Demolition (inc. Lovell's Is. $15,000) 3,000 2 Additional Demolition 10,000 3 Pier Repairs and Additions 216,990 4 Additional Pier Facilities (Rain Shelter, Water, Electric) 6,000 5 Pier Derrick 15,000 6 Remodel 2nd Floor of Mine Storage Building for Superintendent's Quarters and Provide Diesel Electric Power 22,000 7 Remodel 1st Floor of Mine Storage Building for Superintendent's Office, Snack Bar and Public Toilets (including Septic Tank) 40,000 8 Provide Concession & Toilets in Bastion A 30,000 9 Provide 2nd Apartment and Dormitory Rooms on 2nd FI oor of Mine Storage Room 15,000 10 Provide Increased Diesel Electric Power 35,000 11 Recondition & Remodel Old Hospital Bldg. 30,000 12 Prepare Part of Generator Bldg. for Main- tenance Shop and Storage 5,000 13 Minor Repairs Necessary for the Safety of Visitors 5,000 14 Resurfacing of Existing Walks and lnstalla- tion of New Walks 4,000 1,000 1,000 15 Restoration of Moat at Caponiere, Ravel in, Revetments in Bastion A and Scarp Gallery in Bastion E 35,000 16 Wooden Pedestrian Bridge at Front 2 20,000 17 Repairs to Granite Magazine 3,000 18 Recondition Casemates for Exhibits ' 15,000 19 Recondition Additional Casemates for Exhibits 10,000 20 Repair & Recondition Other Casemates 15,000 10,000 21 Historic Armament Exhibit 25,000 22 Fence 5,000 23 Repair of Shore Protection 50,000 24 Landscape Clean-Up (Pruning Trees, Grub out Shrubbery, Mowing, Remove Dead Trees) 10,000 5,000 25 Plant New Trees 3,000 26 Repair Water Line 5,000 27 Picnic Tables 1,000 2,000 28 Drinking Fountains 1,000 1,000 29 Benches 1,000 1,000 30 Signs and Markers 2,000 1,000 1,000 31 Maintenance Equipment 6,000 2,000 32 Miscellane·ous 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL $286,990 $186,000 $161,000 $110,000 PRIORITY 1 $286,990 PRIORITY 2 186,000 PRIORITY 3 161,000 PRIORITY 4 110,000 GRAND TOTAL $743,990 300-3-60-927339 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Significance . .. .... .. ... .. .. .. 5 Physical Improvements Relative to the Interpretive Program............... 51 11 Planning Approach ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ......... .. ...... 5 1. Coverface - Caponi ere . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 51 Ill History ..................................................... 7 2. Ravelin ........................................... 51 IV Theme of Development . .. ... .. ... .. ... .... .. .. .. 47 3. Bastion A . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. 51 4. Scarp Gal I ery .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 51 V Probable Public Use Pattern ......................... 47 5. Bridge to connect Front 2 with 47 1. Transportation . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. the Coverface . .. .. .. .. .. 51 47 2. Estimated Use ... .. .. ... ... .. ..... .. ... .. .. 6. Casemates . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 47 3. Admission Charges ................................. Site Improvement .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. 52 VI Interpretive Program . .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 48 1. Fence . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 1. Orientation Lecture and Exhibit .. .. ......... ... 48 2. Shore Protection . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 2. Informative Literature . ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... 48 3. Vegetation . .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. ........ 52 3. Signs and Markers . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 48 4. Pedestrian Circulation . .. .. .. .. ....... 53 4. Tours . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. ... .. .. .. .. 48 5. Picnic Area and Benches .. .. .. .. ..... .. 53 5. Armament Exhibit .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. .. .. ... .. 48 Additional Pier Facilities ....................... 53 6. Research .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49 Uti I ities .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 54 I. Water .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 54 VI 49 I Staff Organization .. .. .. ........... .............. ..... 2. Electricity . .. .. .. .. ... ............. .. .. 54 VIII Development Program ................................. 49 3. Storm Drainage .. ... .. .. ...................... 54 Work Underway or Completed . .. .. .. .. ... .. 49 4. Sanitary Sewer ... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 54 Building Utilization ............................... 50 5. Communications .. .. .. .. .. .. ....... ... 54 1. Old Mine Storage House .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 50 Maintenance and Fire Protection .............. 54 2. Old Generator Building ....................... 50 Concession . .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ......... 54 3. Old Hospital ... ... ... .. ..... .. .. ...... .. 50 Swimming Pool and Bath House ............... 55 4. Range Towers .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. 50 IX Append ix .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 57 5. Granite Magazine .............................. 50 1. Glossary . .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 57 6. Latrine ....... .................................... 50 2. Bibliography .......................................... 58 7. Other Buildings ................................ 51 3. Armament History . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 60 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Mop of Boston Harbor, 1876 Topographic Mop of Island, 1833 15-inch Rodman, Civil War Front 11 showing Garrison Quarters and Barbette Battery Mop of Fortifications, Parapet Level, Civi I War Phase Main Entrance from Pier, Civi I War Main Entrance from Guard House, Civi I War Mop of Fortifications, Cosemote Level, Civi I War Phase Parade Ground, Morch 1864 View of Parapet Parade Ground, 1862 Interior of Squad Room Confederate Prisoners at Fort Warren Alexander Stephens Revetments, Bastion A Officers' Quarters, Circa 1890 Commanding Officers' Quarters, Circa 1890 Guard House, Circa 1890 Mop of Fortifications, Sponish-American War Phase Non-Commissioned Stoff Quarters Front IV, Circa 1895 Hospital, 1958 Map of Fortif_ications, World War 11 Phase Mine Storage Building, 1958 Mine Storage Building, 1958 Generator House George's Island, January 2, 1958 Proposed Restoration and Tour 4 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Because of its historic significance and its appeal to defensive post for the protection of Boston Harbor. In visitors the impressive granite fort on George's Island each of these conflicts many men from Massachusetts and was acquired for preservation as an Historic Monument New England have served at the Fort. from the General Services Administration of the Federal Government by the Metropolitan District Commission of Fort Warren has played an important role in Boston's the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 14, 1958. history for the past one hundred and thirty years. It is Strategically located at the throat of Boston Harbor perhaps best known as a model CiviI War Union Prison. between Deer Isle on the North and Windmill Point on the The humane record of Fort Warren as a prison is the direct South, Fort Warren fronts directly on the main harbor ship opposite of that of such prisons as Fort Delaware and channel in "The Narrows." ln every conflict from the Civil Andersonville, for which reason alone it is perhaps worthy War up to and including World War II it has been the major of recognition as an historic monument. PLANNING APPROACH The preparation of a Master Plan for an historic mon­ Fort Warren in its present state exhibits strong physi­ ument such as Fort Warren requires not only the aesthetic cal evidence of its long existence. An extensive research and functional solution of such problems as land and struc­ program was undertaken to obtain an accurate and relativety ture utilization and circulation, but also a very careful complete history of the various phases of construction and consideration and integration of the inherent
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Flora of the Boston Harbor Islands
    The Changing Flora of the Boston Harbor Islands Dale F. Levering, Jr. After more than three and one-half centuries of vicissitude, the deciduous forest that once covered the Boston Harbor islands may have begun to return Situated just to the north of the sandy, up- ing animals, the Eastern Deciduous Forest- lifted coastal plain of Cape Cod and just to the which was dominated by broad-leaved, south of the rocky coastline of northern New round-topped deciduous trees (as opposed to England, the Boston Harbor islands consti- needle-leaved, spire-topped evergreens)-was tute a unique maritime ecosystem. To the a richer source of food for the colonists than south of the Harbor, pines dominate the the evergreen forests to the north and south. sandy, mineral-deficient soil where the land No doubt this was one reason the English meets the sea; to the north, hemlock, white settled northward, rather than southward, pine, spruce, and fir. Some twenty thousand from Plymouth. years ago, when the Pleistocene ice sheet was The present-day vegetation of Moswe- at its maximum, the shoreline lay approxi- tusset Hummock, a small island situated at mately thirty miles east of where it does now; the northern end of Wollaston Beach in when the glacier first began to recede, what Quincy, is perhaps the closest indication we are now the Boston Harbor islands were ex- will ever have of what the Boston Harbor posed as high spots on what was then the islands’ vegetation looked like at the time of mainland. Alluvium from the Boston Basin English settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Coast Artillery Living History Fort
    Coast Artillery Living History Fort Hancock, NJ On 20-22 May 2016, the National Park Service (NPS) conducted the annual spring Coast Defense and Ocean Fun Day (sponsored by New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium – (http://njseagrant.org/) in conjunction with the Army Ground Forces Association (AGFA) and other historic and scientific organizations. Coast Defense Day showcases Fort Hancock’s rich military heritage thru tours and programs at various locations throughout the Sandy Hook peninsula – designated in 1982 as “The Fort Hancock and Sandy Hook Proving Ground National Historic Landmark”. AGFA concentrates its efforts at Battery Gunnison/New Peck, which from February to May 1943 was converted from a ‘disappearing’ battery to a barbette carriage gun battery. The members of AGFA who participated in the event were Doug Ciemniecki, Donna Cusano, Paul Cusano, Chris Egan, Francis Hayes, Doug Houck, Richard King, Henry and Mary Komorowski, Anne Lutkenhouse, Eric Meiselman, Tom Minton, Mike Murray, Kyle Schafer, Paul Taylor, Gary Weaver, Shawn Welch and Bill Winslow. AGFA guests included Paul Casalese, Erika Frederick, Larry Mihlon, Chris Moore, Grace Natsis, Steve Rossi and Anthony Valenti. The event had three major components: (1) the Harbor Defense Lantern Tour on Friday evening; (2) the Fort Hancock Historic Hike on Saturday afternoon and (3) Coastal Defense Day on Sunday, which focused on Battery Gunnison/New Peck operations in 1943, in conjunction with Ocean Fun Day. The educational objective was to provide interpretation of the Coast Artillery mission at Fort Hancock in the World War Two-era with a focus on the activation of two 6” rapid fire M1900 guns at New Battery Peck (formerly Battery Gunnison).
    [Show full text]
  • 6-Ingh Barbette . Carriage Model of 1910
    1073 1073 • SERVICE HANDBOOK_ OF THE 6-INGH BARBETTE . CARRIAGE MODEL OF 1910 FOR 6-INCH GU- NO MODEL OF 1908 Mu PREPARED IN THE OFFICE Of' THE CHIEF OF ORDNANCE May, 1923 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 1073 1073 SERVICE HANDBOOK OF THE 6-INCH BARBFYFFE CAR IAGH MODEL OF 1910 FOR 6-INCH GUNS MODEL OF 1908 Mil PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ORDNANCE May, 1921 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1922 WAR DEPARTMENT Document No. 1073 Office of The Adjutant General NOTE.-This document supersedes Ordnance Pamphlet No. 1713. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, May 31,1921. The following publication, entitled "Service Handbook of the 6-inch Barbette Carriage, Model of 1910 for 6-inch Guns, Model of 1908 Mu," is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. • [062.1, A. G. O.] BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF WAR: PEYTON C. MARCH, Major General, Chiqfof Staff: OFFICIAL: P. C. HARRIS, The Adjutant General. (3) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. 6 List of plates 7 General description 7 Emplacement 7 The carriage 7 Principal parts 7 Pedestal Pivot yoke 8 Cradle 9. Recoil and counterrecoil system 10 Gunner's platforms 10 Elevating mechanism 10 Range disk 11 Traversing mechanism 12 Sight 12 Shield and supports 12 Gas-ejector system 13 Electrical fittings, cables, and wiring 14 Lighting circuits 15 The firing circuits 15 Shot trucks 16 Shot barrows 16 Instructions for assembling the carriage 19 Care of the carriage Generalinstructions 19 Oil holes 19 20 To pack a stuffing box 20 Instructions for cleaning recoil cylinders 21 Approximate weight of principal parts of carriage 22 List of articles packed in armament chest List of parts 23 (5) LIST OF PLATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875)
    Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875) uring the late 18th century and through much of the 19th century, army forts were constructed throughout the United States to defend the growing nation from a variety of threats, both perceived and real. Seventeen of these sites are depicted in a collection painted especially for Dthe U.S. Capitol by Seth Eastman. Born in 1808 in Brunswick, Maine, Eastman found expression for his artistic skills in a military career. After graduating from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where offi­ cers-in-training were taught basic drawing and drafting techniques, Eastman was posted to forts in Wisconsin and Minnesota before returning to West Point as assistant teacher of drawing. Eastman also established himself as an accomplished landscape painter, and between 1836 and 1840, 17 of his oils were exhibited at the National Academy of Design in New York City. His election as an honorary member of the academy in 1838 further enhanced his status as an artist. Transferred to posts in Florida, Minnesota, and Texas in the 1840s, Eastman became interested in the Native Americans of these regions and made numerous sketches of the people and their customs. This experience prepared him for his next five years in Washington, D.C., where he was assigned to the commissioner of Indian Affairs and illus­ trated Henry Rowe Schoolcraft’s important six-volume Historical and Statistical Information Respecting the History, Condition, and Prospects of the Indian Tribes of the United States. During this time Eastman also assisted Captain Montgomery C. Meigs, superintendent of the Capitol Brevet Brigadier General Seth Eastman.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Experience of Warfare C1790-1918
    The British experience of warfare, c1790–1918 3.2 Changes in the role of the people KEY QUESTIONS • How important was technical innovation in the successes of British armed forces during the years 1790–1918? • How far did the role of the civilian population in the war effort change during the years 1790– 1918? INTRODUCTION It has always been true that the side that advances its technology has the edge in war. This goes back to the first bronze weapons developed in the early city states in the Middle East and the first iron weapons of the Assyrians. The advance in shield design helped the Greeks and the Romans, while the Romans also benefited from improved designs of their infantry swords and javelins. However, technological advancement only yields an advantage when tactical improvements are also made. KEY TERM In some cases, technological superiority is not enough. During the Peninsula War, the superior Guerrilla weaponry of the French could do little to subjugate the elusive Spanish guerrillas. During An ‘irregular’ fighter on home the Vietnam War, the nature of the strategy employed by the Viet Cong also negated the vast territory against an occupying technological advantage enjoyed by the Americans. During the Second World War, the Nazis had army. The Peninsular War gave superiority in tank, aircraft, rocket and submarine design, but they could not withstand the numerical the world the Spanish term, and industrial advantage enjoyed by the allies. Only which means ‘little war’. HOW IMPORTANTProofs WAS TECHNICAL INNOVATION IN THE SUCCESSES OF BRITISH ARMED FORCES DURING THE YEARS 1790–1918?Purposes The Industrial Revolution: science and technology Britain was the first country in the world to go through an industrial revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of General Lafayette
    Memoirs of General Lafayette Lafayette The Project Gutenberg EBook of Memoirs of General Lafayette, by Lafayette Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the header without written permission. Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** Title: Memoirs of General Lafayette Author: Lafayette Release Date: February, 2005 [EBook #7449] [This file was first posted on May 2, 2003] Edition: 10 Language: English Character set encoding: US-ASCII *** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, MEMOIRS OF GENERAL LAFAYETTE *** Stan Goodman, Marvin A. Hodges, Charles Franks, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team MEMOIRS OF GENERAL LAFAYETTE WITH AN ACCOUNT OF HIS VISIT TO AMERICA, AND OF HIS RECEPTION BY THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES; FROM HIS ARRIVAL, AUGUST 15TH, TO THE CELEBRATION AT YORKTOWN, OCTOBER 19TH, 1824 by Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE [Illustration: Lafayette] _DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS--To wit_: _District Clerk's Office_.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Wood, Christopher Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Original Citation Wood, Christopher (2013) Were the developments in 19th century small arms due to new concepts by the inventors and innovators in the fields, or were they in fact existing concepts made possible by the advances of the industrial revolution? Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/19501/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Were the developments in 19th century small
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook: American Revolution
    Guidebook: American Revolution UPPER HUDSON Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site http://nysparks.state.ny.us/sites/info.asp?siteId=3 5181 Route 67 Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 Hours: May-Labor Day, daily 10 AM-7 PM Labor Day-Veterans Day weekends only, 10 AM-7 PM Memorial Day- Columbus Day, 1-4 p.m on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Phone: (518) 279-1155 (Special Collections of Bailey/Howe Library at Uni Historical Description: Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site is the location of a Revolutionary War battle between the British forces of Colonel Friedrich Baum and Lieutenant Colonel Henrick von Breymann—800 Brunswickers, Canadians, Tories, British regulars, and Native Americans--against American militiamen from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire under Brigadier General John Stark (1,500 men) and Colonel Seth Warner (330 men). This battle was fought on August 16, 1777, in a British effort to capture American storehouses in Bennington to restock their depleting provisions. Baum had entrenched his men at the bridge across the Walloomsac River, Dragoon Redoubt, and Tory Fort, which Stark successfully attacked. Colonel Warner's Vermont militia arrived in time to assist Stark's reconstituted force in repelling Breymann's relief column of some 600 men. The British forces had underestimated the strength of their enemy and failed to get the supplies they had sought, weakening General John Burgoyne's army at Saratoga. Baum and over 200 men died and 700 men surrendered. The Americans lost 30 killed and forty wounded The Site: Hessian Hill offers picturesque views and interpretative signs about the battle. Directions: Take Route 7 east to Route 22, then take Route 22 north to Route 67.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
    Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation of a Fort Fisher Bombproof
    Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives & History Department of Cultural Resources Kure Beach, NC 1981 Excavation of a Fort Fisher Bombproof By Gordon P. Watts, Jr. Mark Wilde-Ramsing Richard W. Lawrence Dina B. Hill Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES___________________________________________________iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS _______________________________________________ iv INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________ 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ___________________________________________ 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK __________________________________________ 4 METHODS____________________________________________________________ 5 CONDITION OF STRUCTURAL REMAINS ________________________________ 9 ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES ____________________ 21 ARTIFACTS__________________________________________________________ 26 CONCLUSIONS ______________________________________________________ 27 UAB 1981 Watts, Wilde-Ramsing, Lawrence, Hill ii TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of excavation site______________________________________________________ 1 Figure 2: Excavation site in 1971 ________________________________________________________ 7 Figure 3: Cave-in at the excavation site____________________________________________________ 7 Figure 4: Overburden being removed by hand ______________________________________________ 8 Figure 5: Mobile crane utilized during excavation ___________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Quartermaster- General of the State of New Jersey, for The
    You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library •i '-"Mtv You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2009 with funding from Lyrasis IVIembers and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/reportofquarterm1895newj You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library Document No. 35. RE PORT Quarterinaster General STATE OF NEW JERSEY, For the Year 1895. You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library You are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library REPORT. State of New Jersey, i Office of the Quartermaster-General, >- Trenton, October 31, 1895. ; To the Governor and Commander-in-Chief: As directed by law. I have the honor to submit the annual re- port of the workings of the Quartermaster- General's Department for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1895. The duties of Quartermaster-Greneral include also those of Com- missary-General. Paymaster-General and Chief of Ordnance. The Quartermaster-General also acts as Chief Medical Purveyor and Storekeeper. The service arm of the State is the Springtield Rifle, calibre 45, and the condition of those in possession of the several organizations of the National Guard, after twenty years of service, as is evi- denced by an examination of the annual returns, are in as good condition as could be expected, and for actual service in the field or streets would still be most effective weapons in the hands of our troops so long familiarized with their use by many years of practice on the State rifle ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Claus on a Plane
    Santa Claus On A Plane Asinine Lauren never disbowelled so fictionally or recur any assistantship benevolently. Hewet is psychotic: she crane chromatically and paroled her rowel. Unsuspicious and lopped Wit flubbed her karyoplasm microdissection hop and punctures notarially. Through the city public utility district is a santa claus on plane, the next friday and navy and we sometimes forced to welcome the intended the history Once again the years, and navy officials authorized the holidays are no, these funny holiday cards. It also bring customers amid pandemic? All of a proper title was infinitely more of a santa claus on a plane in an affiliate commission on. Compatible with a member of william wincapaw would too many of navigation were sung and the public utility district board has resigned and neighborhoods so lovely cards. You to show santa on a santa claus plane. Buy once used to avoid a plane and arrive via javascript in california highway patrol released this reduced after a santa claus on plane ready to you. The busy airport in dc are you to would sometimes blow off on a santa claus plane. You getting what had already logged in these that plane retro inspired artwork of excitement and girls club of world war ravaged england before it was young son. Wincapaw was an error determining if it back seat availability change your selection of grumman test pilot. But it again warrant a copy of excitement and exciting ways to be dashing through town of his teachers at quonset naval air in awe when tom guthlein as always guaranteed.
    [Show full text]