DOCSLIB.ORG

Tramway to Higham Way Outline Feasibility Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tramway to Higham Way Outline Feasibility Report REPORT NO 70016827-01 TRAMWAY TO HIGHAM WAY OUTLINE FEASIBILITY REPORT June 2016 TRAMWAY TO HIGHAM WAY OUTLINE FEASIBILITY REPORT Oxfordshire County Council Type of document (version) Project no: 70016827 Date: June 2016 – WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Mountbatten House Basing View Basingstoke Tel: +44 (0) 1256 318 800 Fax: +44 (0) 1256 318 700 www.wsp-pb.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE REVISION 1 REVISION 2 REVISION 3 Remarks Draft Final Final Date 20/05/2016 17/06/2016 28/06/2016 Prepared by Georgios Savvidis Georgios Savvidis Georgios Savvidis Signature Checked by Graham Slade Graham Slade Graham Slade Signature Authorised by Graham Slade Graham Slade Graham Slade Signature Project number Report number File reference ii PRODUCTION TEAM CLIENT Function Name Natalie Moore Oxfordshire CC Project Manager WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Function Name Project Director Graham Slade Project Manager/Structures Lead Georgios Savvidis Highways Lead Graham Hemmings Ecology Lead Rebecca Mulley Ground Engineering Lead Andrew Indoe SUBCONSULTANTS None Tramway to Higham Way WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Oxfordshire County Council Project No 70016827 June 2016 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................1 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................................2 3 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................................3 3.1 GEOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................................................3 4 REPORT PHILOSOPHY & ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TOPOGRAPHICAL CONSTRAINTS ...........................................................................................................7 4.2 DESIGN & BUILDABILITY ........................................................................................................................8 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................................8 4.4 COSTS ..................................................................................................................................................8 4.5 VALUE MANAGEMENT.......................................................................................................................... 8 5 STRUCTURAL OPTIONS ..............................................................................................................................10 5.1 OPTION A: COMPOSITE STEEL BOX GIRDER ..........................................................................................10 5.2 OPTION B: CABLE STAYED ...................................................................................................................14 6 HIGHWAY OPTIONS ................................................................................................................................... 17 6.1 REVIEW OF HIGHWAY ALIGNMENT INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS .............................................................17 6.2 DEPARTURES FROM STANDARDS (IF REQUIRED) ..................................................................................17 6.3 NON-MOTORISED USER REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 17 6.4 TIE-IN CONSIDERATION TO EXISTING NETWORK ..................................................................................18 7 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................................20 7.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 21 7.2 GEOTECHNICAL RISK ........................................................................................................................... 22 7.3 TOPOGRAPHY..................................................................................................................................... 22 7.4 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................23 7.5 GROUND CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 24 7.6 REGIONAL GEOLOGY...........................................................................................................................26 7.7 DRIFT GEOLOGY..................................................................................................................................27 7.8 SOLID GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 28 7.9 IDENTIFIED GEOLOGICAL RISKS ...........................................................................................................28 7.10 HYDROLOGY ....................................................................................................................................... 30 7.11 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................... 35 8 ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................................................................................................37 8.1 AIR QUALITY ....................................................................................................................................... 38 8.2 CULTURAL HERITAGE ..........................................................................................................................39 8.3 LANDSCAPE, TOWNSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT CULTURAL HERITAGE ................................................. 40 8.4 NATURE CONSERVATION .................................................................................................................... 41 8.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ..........................................................................................................................42 8.6 MATERIALS......................................................................................................................................... 43 8.7 NOISE AND VIBRATION ....................................................................................................................... 44 8.8 PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................................... 44 8.9 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................46 9 STATUTORY UNDERTAKERS ....................................................................................................................... 49 10 RISK REGISTER ...........................................................................................................................................50 Tramway to Higham Way WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Oxfordshire County Council Project No 70016827 June 2016 iv 11 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 56 12 BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................................................... 57 APPENDICES Appendix A – Structures A-1: Option A renders A-2: Option B renders Appendix B – Highways B-1: Highway alignment options Appendix C – Geotechnical C-1: Envirocheck report C-2: Historical boreholes Appendix C – Environment D-1: Environmental constraints map Tramway to Higham Way WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Oxfordshire County Council Project No 70016827 June 2016 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This outline feasibility report presents options for linking Tramway Road to Higham Way as part of the Banbury Transport Strategy, contained within the Fourth Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan (LTP4) and in response to a brief provided by Oxfordshire County Council. The main choices for a link road from Tramway Road to Highway Way are an overbridge or tunnel over / under the existing railway. The tunnel option has been ruled out of this report due to prohibitive costs and risks during construction. This report describes two structurally viable bridge options at this location and compares the parameters so that a recommendation can be reached. The recommendation of this report is subject to a number of assumptions that may influence the final outcome. The provisional recommendation is that there are a significant number of adverse issues in developing a bridge solution at this location, and that further investigation of an alternative site for a link road across the railway (east to west) should be pursued to achieve the strategic aim. Tramway to Higham Way WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Oxfordshire County Council Project No 70016827 June 2016 2 2 PROJECT BACKGROUND The Banbury Transport Strategy contained within the Fourth Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan (LTP4), identified the need for investigating the impact of a highway link within the Grimsbury area of Banbury, from east to west of the railway, and potentially, Oxford Canal and River Cherwell. WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff (WSP-PB) was appointed by Oxfordshire County Council (OCC)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quality As a Space to Spend Time Proximity and Quality of Alternatives Active Travel Networks Heritage Concluaiona Site No. Site
    Quality as a space to spend Proximity and quality of Active travel networks Heritage Concluaiona time alternatives GI network (More than 1 of: Activities for different ages/interests Where do spaces currently good level of public use/value, Within such as suitability for informal sports and play/ provide key walking/cycling links? Biodiversity, cta, sports, Public Access Visual interest such as variety and colour Number of other facilities Which sites do or Agricultural Active Travel Networks curtilage/a Historic Local Landscape value variety of routes/ walking routes Level of anti-social behaviour (Public rights of way SSS Conservation Ancient OC Flood Zone In view allotments, significant visual Individual GI Site No. Site Name (Unrestricted, Description of planting, surface textures, mix of green Level of use within a certain distance that could best provide Land SAC LNR LWS (Directly adjacent or djoining In CA? park/garde Heritage Landscape Type of open space in Local Value Further Details/ Sensitivity to Change Summary Opportunities /presence, quality and usage of play and perceptions of safety National Cycle Network I Target Areas Woodlands WS (Worst) cone? interest or townscape protections Limited, Restricted) and blue assets, presence of public art perform the same function alternatives, if any Classification containing a network) listed n Assets this area equipment/ Important local connections importance, significant area of building? presence of interactive public art within Oxford) high flood risk (flood zone 3)) Below ground Above ground archaeology archaeology Areas of current and former farmland surrounded by major roads and edge of city developments, such as hotels, garages and Yes - contains two cycle Various areas of National Cycle Routes 5 and 51 Loss of vegetation to development and Northern Gateway a park and ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options Consultation Document
    Contents Introduction 2 Bromsgrove District: An Overview 3 Why do we need to review the District Plan? 4 How will the Review affect the current District Plan policies? 4 National Planning Policy Framework 4 Strategic Planning and the Duty to Cooperate 5 The Plan Review Process 5 Evidence Base 7 Draft Green Belt Purposes Assessment Methodology 7 Draft Site Selection Methodology 7 Scoping and Sustainability Appraisal 9 About this consultation and how to respond 9 Next steps 10 Vision and Objectives of the District Plan 11 Vision 12 Objectives 12 Issues and Options 14 Strategic Issues for Bromsgrove District 16 Housing 26 Employment 34 Transport 41 Town Centre and Local Centres 48 Social Infrastructure 53 Natural and Historic Environments 58 Climate Change and Water Resources 63 Glossary 66 1 Introduction 90% The District covers of the District is In 2016 Bromsgrove 2 designated Green was home to about 217km Belt 96,800 people 2 1.2 The area is well served by motorways, with the M5 running north/south (J4, J4a and J5) and the M42 east/west 1. Introduction (J1, J2 and J3). The M5 and M42 connect with the M6 to the north of Birmingham and M40 to the east. The District also Bromsgrove District: benefits from train and bus connections into Birmingham City Centre and the wider region, and Bromsgrove Town An Overview is only 34km (21 miles) from Birmingham International Airport. 1.1 Bromsgrove District is situated in north Worcestershire and covers approximately 21,714 hectares. Although the 1.3 The main centre of population in Bromsgrove District town is located only 22km (14 miles) from the centre of is Bromsgrove Town with other larger centres being Birmingham, the District is predominantly rural with Alvechurch, Barnt Green, Catshill, Hagley, Rubery, and approximately 90% of the land designated as Green Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratford Upon Avon Parkway Station Prospectus
    STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus Integration, Community and Delivery: A Masterplan for Stratford-upon-Avon Parkway station STRATFORD-UPON-AVON PARKWAY STATION May 2020 FOREWORD Introducing the concept of Stations as Places The Stations as Places (SAP) programme is a process to help put railway stations at the heart of local communities. It is designed to create a vision for the future and to identify opportunities for delivering improvements to the local environment and create a welcoming ambience. The aim is to work in partnership with others to unlock potential and to meet shared objectives and aspirations. Railway stations are more than access points to the rail network; they can be hubs of activity that are rooted in the locality with the potential to support regeneration and development opportunities. They can also host community and business activities and offer facilities/infrastructure to encourage sustainable, multi modal travel with a view to reducing car dependency and improving local air quality. The Vision “We will develop stations as quality gateways between communities and the railway, supporting the changing needs of our passengers, residents and visitors. Stations in the West Midlands will be community assets, supporting the wellbeing and development of the areas they serve through involving local community and business.” West Midlands Station Alliance (WMSA) Mission Statement What does the prospectus do for Stratford-upon-Avon Parkway Station? There is an important role for the railways to play in both the economic and social regeneration of the local areas which our stations serve. This Opportunity Prospectus sets out the economic, social and geographic landscape of the area around our station and highlights some of the opportunities for commercial development, partnership working, inward investment and community regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Growth of Redditch Borough
    Housing Growth Background Document January 2013 Introduction Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council jointly consulted on cross boundary growth options in 2010. Since then changes to the planning system have meant that both Councils need to work together to find a solution to meet the growth needs of Redditch which cannot all be sustainably accommodated within the Borough. The Councils have agreed to work together to find land within Bromsgrove District, in the vicinity of Redditch Borough, to sustainably accommodate this additional housing growth. This is a non-technical document that has been written to explain how a location has been identified by officers of both authorities to meet this cross-boundary growth. For this reason, technical information is not included but cross-referenced or results summarised in the relevant paragraphs. This document is structured to reflect the process of site selection and the following provides a summary of what each chapter will cover: Chapter Summary 1. Background To explain why cross boundary growth is necessary and how the growth requirements have been determined. This will cover the legislation, planning policies and evidence documents that are relevant to this cross boundary growth issue. 2. Strategic Objectives To identify the Strategic Objectives which site(s) will need to contribute to. 3. Methodology To explain how the site selection process was carried out and the sources of information. 4. Area Assessment Principles To identify the principles that will be used in the area assessment process. 5. Broad Area Appraisal To identify broad area(s) that are more appropriate for accommodating the development in accordance with relevant criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX 4A – Email Responses
    1 ANNEX 4a – Email Responses RESPONDENT VIEW COMMENTS Key Stakeholders/Groups I accept this junction has been closed for a number of weeks due to road maintenance, however any longer- term proposal to restrict vehicular traffic is NOT supported. 1. Emergency response times for ALL Emergency services to this area will increase and detrimental to public Thames Valley Police Object safety. 2. Walton Street is currently a defined Diversion route for Blue light services and other vehicles during closures of St Giles. Alternative Diversions much longer and detrimental in terms of Emergency response to North Oxford. Can see this would be beneficial to the residents of Walton street, I do have some concerns regarding Emergency access. Since the current closure has been in place, we have attended quite a few minor incidents, and the only Fire & Rescue Service, access has been via St Giles and little clarendon street or St Margret’s road for the Hydraulic Platform (due (Rewley Road & Slade Concerns to the size and amount of swing on the vehicle) Park White Watch) Whilst I am not opposed to a temporary traffic closure trial myself, I would personally like the ability to access via a transponder and a bollard or some other mechanism that we could breach? Obviously, a sign would do the same, but would state only emergency vehicles have access. During the current road closures on Walton Street, our appliances have been significantly delayed in attending properties down Walton Street and the surrounding side roads/Port Meadow because of high traffic levels, tight roads for the diversion and the length of time it takes us to get to suitable diversion routes that are listed in the consultation map.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-6-1-Transport-Assessment
    2142-01-TA01d July 2017 PROPOSED HOTEL AT PARC CYBI, HOLYHEAD TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Prepared on behalf of: The Conygar Investment Company Plc & Premier Inn Limited AXIS Camellia House 76 Water Lane Wilmslow SK9 5BB Tel: 0844 8700 007 www.axisped.co.uk Proposed 80-bed Hotel Development Parc Cybi, Holyhead, Anglesey Transport Assessment DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposal Site Planning History .......................................................................... 1 1.3 Report Structure ................................................................................................ 2 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORT CONDITIONS ............................................................ 3 2.1 Site Location ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Existing Site and Access ................................................................................... 3 2.3 Description of the Local Highway Network ......................................................... 3 2.4 Highway Safety: Personal Injury Accident Data ................................................. 5 2.5 Site Sustainability .............................................................................................. 5 2.6 Summary ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus
    STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus An integrated masterplan vision and delivery plan for Longbridge Station MULTI-STOREY CAR PARK PROPOSED LONGBRIDGE BUSINESS PARK 2 DEVON WAY LONGBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY PARK OFFICES AND YOUTH CENTRE NEW PARK AND RIDE RAILWAY STATION LONGBRIDGE STATION JUNE 2020 Foreword Introducing the concept of Stations as Places The Stations as Places programme aims to promote local railway stations as community ‘hubs’ rather than simply access points onto the rail network. The vision is to develop local railway stations as an asset highly valued within the community, contributing to economic growth and acting as a hub for creativity, heritage and social amenity. The Vision “We will develop stations as quality gateways between communities and the railway, supporting the changing needs of our passengers, residents and visitors. Stations in the West Midlands will be community assets, supporting the wellbeing and development of the areas they serve through involving local community and business.” -West Midlands Station Alliance (WMSA) Mission Statement What does the prospectus do for Longbridge? There is an important role for the railways to play in both the economic and social regeneration of the local areas which our stations serve. This Opportunity Prospectus sets out the economic, social and geographic landscape of the area around our station and highlights some of the opportunities for commercial development, partnership working, inward investment and community regeneration. We have included a profile of Longbridge Station in this document and looked at different types of activity neighbouring our station, from local businesses providing facilities to the travelling public, local authorities using existing assets in different ways, businesses looking for investment opportunities, and the impact of new development in the surrounding area.
    [Show full text]
  • Land to the North and West of Bishopton Lane, Stratford-Upon- Site Address Avon
    COMMITTEE REPORT Application Ref. 15/04499/OUT Land To The North And West of Bishopton Lane, Stratford-upon- Site Address Avon Outline planning application with means of site access from Bishopton Lane and The Ridgeway (internal access, layout, scale, Description of appearance and landscaping reserved for subsequent approval) for Development the erection of up to 500 dwellings (Use Class C3) safeguarding land for a single form entry Primary School (Use Class D1), public open space and all other necessary ancillary and enabling works. Applicant Miller Homes Ltd & Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd Reason for Referral Scale of Development, Objection from Town Council, Objection from to Committee Ward Member Case Officer David Jeffery Presenting Officer David Jeffery Ward Member(s) Councillor Vaudry Town/Parish Stratford Town Council Council . Highway Constraints . Flood Risk . Canal embankment Description of Site . Hedgerows and mature trees Constraints . Public Footpaths within the site . Listed buildings . Non-designated heritage assets Summary of . GRANT SUBJECT TO S106 AGREEMENT Recommendation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The proposal before members is to create an urban extension to the north west of Stratford Upon Avon on land to the north and west of Bishopton Lane and south east of the A46 in Bishopton ward. The site comprises approximately 25.3 hectares of agricultural land which would be accessed via a roundabout and a priority junction on Bishopton Lane and from a priority junction on The Ridgeway. The site would deliver up to 500 dwellings at densities between 25 and 35 dwellings per hectare and would also safeguarded land for a primary school. 8.92 Hectares of public open space would be provided in a mix of uses including informal open space sports pitches and play facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratford-Upon-Avon Station
    STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus Integration, Community and Delivery: A Masterplan for Stratford-upon-Avon station STRATFORD-UPON-AVON STATION May 2020 FOREWORD Introducing the concept of Stations as Places The Stations as Places (SAP) programme is a process to help put railway stations at the heart of local communities. It is designed to help create a vision for the future and to identify opportunities for delivering improvements to the local environment and create a welcoming ambience. The aim is to work in partnership with others to unlock potential and to meet shared objectives and aspirations. Railway stations are more than access points to the rail network; they can be hubs of activity that are rooted in the locality with the potential to support regeneration and development opportunities. They can also host community and business activities and offer facilities/infrastructure to encourage sustainable, multi modal travel with a view to reducing car dependency and improving local air quality. The Vision “We will develop stations as quality gateways between communities and the railway, supporting the changing needs of our passengers, residents and visitors. Stations in the West Midlands will be community assets, supporting the wellbeing and development of the areas they serve through involving local community and business.” West Midlands Station Alliance (WMSA) Mission Statement What does this prospectus do for Stratford-upon-Avon Station? There is an important role for the railways to play in both the economic and social regeneration of the local areas which our stations serve. This Opportunity Prospectus sets out the economic, social and geographic landscape of the area around our station and highlights some of the opportunities for commercial development, partnership working, inward investment and community regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromsgrove Stations As Places Prospectus
    STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus An integrated masterplan vision and delivery plan for Bromsgrove Bromsgrove Station November 2020 Contents Page Introducing the concept of Stations for Places The Stations as Places programme aims to promote local railway stations as community ‘hubs’ rather than simply access points onto the rail network. The vision is to develop local railway stations as an asset highly valued within the community, contributing to economic growth and acting as a hub for creativity, heritage and social amenity. The Vision “We will develop stations as quality gateways between communities and the railway, supporting the changing needs of our passengers, residents and visitors. Stations in the West Midlands will be community assets, supporting the wellbeing and development of the areas they serve through involving local community and business.” West Midlands Station Alliance (WMSA) Mission Statement Chapter Page Chapter Page Why ‘Stations as Places’ for 3-7 Listening to our Community 23 Bromsgrove? Development Opportunities 24 Bringing our Partners Together 8 Opportunities for Investment 25 Key Facts 9 Action Plan and Targets 26 The Next Steps 27 What do we know? 10-12 Who to contact and how to get 28 The Station – Services and Trains 13 involved Headline Opportunities 14-16 ‘Last Mile’ Concept Plan 17-18 Get in touch and keep up to date Opportunity Plan 19 Community Insight 20 You can email [email protected] and one of The Aspiration 21-22 the team will get back to you! You can also follow progress on Stations as Places at: www.wmre.org.uk/stationsalliance 2 Coronavirus (Covid-19) Reviving our Railway The Covid-19 pandemic has caused massive economic and social disruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy
    ISLE OF ANGLESEY COUNTY COUNCIL Committee: Executive Committee Date: 13 January 2014 Portfolio Holder: Councillor Richard A Dew Corporate Director: Arthur W Owen Title: Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy 1.0 Purpose of Report 1.1 To gain Executive approval for the Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy. 2.0 Background 2.1 The need for a co-ordinated approach across the Council to maximise the benefits to Anglesey of cycling has been highlighted by a number of issues. A strategy has therefore been produced to address these points and assist Anglesey to grow economically, in health and with an improved environment. 2.2 In November 2013 the Active Travel (Wales) Act 2013 was given Royal Assent and it will bring with it a number of new statutory functions which aim to encourage active travel to work, education and other destinations which would otherwise be made by car. 2.3 A number of potential major projects across the island are set to be developed over the next few years which emphasise the need for a strategy to ensure that the island receives the legacy benefits which should come from such schemes. 2.4 Tourism initiatives such as the Ymweld â Môn project will be assisted by a cycling strategy helping to target funding to encourage Anglesey as a cycling destination. 3.0 Recommendations 3.1 That the Council approve the Cycling Strategy for use as a lead document for the development of cycle facilities on Anglesey. Report by: Dewi R Williams Job Title: Head of Service (Environment and Technical Service) Department: Sustainable Development Department Date: 20th November 2013 Appendices: Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy Background Papers: None Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy November 2013 Isle of Anglesey County Council Cycling Strategy Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OCC Northern Gateway.Indd
    7 Settlement Form Urban Form Located in the north of Oxford, at the settlement edge, The existence of high capacity highway infrastructure has the site is characterised as an area of scattered roadside dictated the scattered development within the site. The development in an agricultural landscape. The area was land uses are largely there to service passing traffic or previously known as the Wolvercote Fields, an open car bound customers and have been engineered around arable and pastoral landscape, but today it is dominated vehicle movements and car parking. Consequently they by the A40 and A44 road corridors that trisect the are not locally distinctive nor offer any real sense of place. site and the elevated A34 highway to the north, which isolates the site from the surrounding countryside. The Within the wider area, Sunnymead is most distinctive for historic pattern of fields and hedgerows partly survives the substantial, mainly detached, dwellings that address to the west of the A40 and between the A40 and A44. Sunderland Avenue (A40) and Woodstock Road. These homes are set back from the main road within their own The land is formed by smooth, gently undulating and grounds and follow a fairly regular rhythm in terms of plot low-lying areas of Oxford Clay. The Oxford to Bicester width and building height (generally two stories) but the railway line defines the eastern boundary of the site. It variation in style and materials adds to the interest of the lies in a cutting and rises above grade as it continues streetscape. Upper Wolvercote is focused around the northward, restricting the possibility of connections 14th century Church of St Peter.
    [Show full text]