DOCSLIB.ORG

Monarch Green

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MONARCH GREEN Land at Foxlydiate Lane, Webheath Design and Access Statement March 2016 MONARCH GREEN Land at Foxlydiate Lane, Webheath Barton Willmore / 101 Victoria Street Bristol BS1 6PU / tel: 0117 929 9677 email: [email protected] Desk Top Publishing and Graphic Design by Barton Willmore Graphic Design This artwork was printed on paper using fibre sourced from sustainable plantation wood from suppliers who practice sustainable management of forests in line with strict international standards. Pulp used in its manufacture is also Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF). J:\23000 - 23999\23400 - 23499\23451 - Webheath\A5 - Reports & Graphics\Graphics\InDesign\Document\23451 DAS 02 © The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of The Barton Willmore Partnership. All plans are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. Crown Copyright Reserved. License No. 100019279. Date: 11.3.16 / Status: Final / Rev: b Author: CDB / Checked by: JDH PAGE 4 MONARCH GREEN Chapter 1: Chapter 2: Chapter 3: MONARCH GREEN OUTLINE PLANNING ASSESSING THE VISION APPLICATION THE CONTEXT: PROPOSALS STRATEGIC 1.1. The Vision for Monarch Green 10 2.1. Summary and Status 3.1. Planning Context 34 of the Proposals 22 1.2. The DAS - Structure 3.2. Access and Movement 36 and Process 12 2.2. Land Use 24 3.3. Local Facilities 40 1.3. The Site 14 2.3. Access and Movement 26 3.4. Landscape baseline 42 1.4. Proposal Overview 18 2.4. Scale 28 3.5. Visual baseline 50 2.5. Green Infrastructure: Planting Retention and Removal 30 PAGE 5 MONARCH GREEN Chapter 4: Chapter 5: Chapter 6: ACCESSING THE ACCESSING THE EVALUATION CONTEXT: LOCAL CONTEXT: THE SITE 6.1. Summary of Community 4.1. Historic Context 54 5.1. Access 74 and Stakeholder Involvement 96 4.2. Local Character 58 5.2. Flooding and Drainage 76 6.2. Evaluation 98 4.3. Area 1: Oakenshaw 5.3. Landscape setting 78 6.3. Design Evolution 100 Road, Redditch 60 5.4. Landform 80 6.4. Design Principles 106 4.4. Area 2: Abbey Road, Redditch 62 5.5. Ecology 82 6.5. Design Concept 108 4.5. Area 3: Webheath, Redditch 64 5.6. Heritage 86 4.6. Area 4: Feckenham 66 5.7. Utilities and Noise 88 4.7. Area 5: Belbroughton 68 5.8. Summary of Constraints 4.8. Inspirational Qualities 70 and Opportunities 90 PAGE 6 MONARCH GREEN Chapter 7: Chapter 8: Chapter 9: ILLUSTRATING THE ILLUSTRATING THE SUMMARY QUALITY OF DESIGN: QUALITY OF DESIGN: 9.1. Summary 166 SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FORM 7.1. Sustainability and Energy 112 8.1. Approach to Character 148 7.2. Access and Movement 114 8.2. Holyoake Park 154 7.3. Street Hierarchy and 8.3. Cur Green 156 Car Parking 120 8.4. Monarch Green Village 158 7.4. The Landscape Masterplan 132 8.5. Spring Rise 162 7.5. The Play provision Strategy 136 7.6. Drainage 142 7.7. Phasing 144 PAGE 7 Chapter 1: MONARCH GREEN THE VISION MONARCH GREEN 1.1. THE VISION FOR MONARCH GREEN The development at Monarch Green will signal a new chapter in the development of Redditch. It will be underpinned by the creation of a generous green infrastructure which retains existing green capital and incorporates a connected network of sustainable transport routes and spaces. A truly distinctive place will be formed through the retention of important site features and the aspiration to create an exciting new garden neighbourhood for the future. PAGE 10 | 1. MONARCH GREEN - THE VISION MONARCH GREEN GENEROUS GREEN CONNECTED DISTINCTIVE A NEW GARDEN INFRASTRUCTURE NEIGHBOURHOOD Regard existing green capital Providing the opportunity Re-define the quality of the The proposals will reflect the on site as an important asset to for transport choice; making northern suburban interface of aims and aspirations of RCBD structure the proposals. This sustainable travel attractive Redditch with the countryside. 1.1 policy. should be maintained within and convenient. generously proportioned green Create a development which Create a new walkable spaces to form the spine of the Form a connected network of is inherently distinctive due neighbourhood where key development. green and urban connections to the incorporation of major facilities are located on the within the site and to wider existing green infrastructure doorstep. Provision of multi-functional destinations. The proposals and mature planting. green areas that are arranged should respond to key desire Provide a new local centre to to provide a legible and lines to Monarchs Way and Celebrate the integration aid the creation of a thriving meaningful structure. Sustrans Route 5. of development with the and happy neighbourhood that landscape through the encourages social interaction Fully connected green spaces Promote connections to the retention and enhancement of and community pride. which link existing assets on wealth of facilities located in visual linkages and responding and off site with new amenity Redditch town centre. to the topography. Ensure a generosity of space spaces. within the development, Encourage and enhance social Ensure a generosity of space setting it apart from other new View the setting of Spring connections between the new within green space and the developments and aiding the Brook as a unique and and existing community. development as a whole; creation of a landmark new attractive asset. The creation setting the site apart from garden neighbourhood. of Spring Brook Walk will other new developments and form a major new countryside setting a landmark for creating edge, providing a linear space a garden neighbourhood for for recreation, wildlife habitat the future. creation and play. PAGE 11 | 1. MONARCH GREEN - THE VISION MONARCH GREEN 1.2. THE DAS - STRUCTURE AND PROCESS This Design and Access AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Outline Planning Application OF THE DAS Statement (DAS) has » Presentation of parameter plans and been prepared by Barton associated wording that are to be ‘fixed’ as 1.2.1. The DAS sets out and justifies the design part of the outline planning application. Willmore on behalf of the rationale for the proposals. It has been applicants. It has been prepared in accordance with guidance and Assessment written in conjunction policy contained in the following documents; with Bilfinger GVA, Phil » Guidance on Information Requirements » An analysis of the wider context. Jones Associates, Wardell and Validation (CLG, March 2012) » Key design influences within Webheath, Armstrong and Barton » Development Management Procedure Redditch and the wider area. Willmore Landscape. This Order (DPMO) (2015) » Site assessment. » Streamlining the Planning Application document supports a Hybrid Involvement and Evaluation Planning Application for Process: Consultation (CLG, 2013) mixed use development at » Planning Practice Guidance (2014) » A summary of stakeholder and community involvement. Monarch Green, Webheath 1.2.2. The document is part of a (also known as land at comprehensive package of information » Evaluation based on assessment and involvement stages to inform a design Foxlydiate Lane). submitted with the application and provides a detailed framework of guidance and concept and strategies. specification to guide and control the elements of the development. It will explain Design the proposals in a concise and structured » Illustrative strategy plans which help to way to ensure that those considering the further explain the proposals. application will understand the rationale that underpins it. 1.2.5. As per regulation 8(3) of the DMPO the DAS shall; DAS STRUCTURE (c) Explain the policy adopted as to access, and how policies relating to access in relevant 1.2.3. The CABE document ‘Design and Access Statements – how to write, read and local development documents have been use them’ (2006) refers to an ‘assessment- taken in to account. involvement-evaluation-design process’ (d) State what, if any, consultation has been which it states, closely mirrors a good design undertaken on issues relating to access to process and enables the final design proposals the development and what account has to be informed by a clear understanding of been taken of the outcomes of any such the site and the wider context. consultation; and 1.2.4. The DAS is structured in accordance (e) Explain how any specific issues which with this CABE guidance and sets out the might affect access to the development have following; been addressed. PAGE 12 | 1. MONARCH GREEN - THE VISION MONARCH GREEN Red Line Boundary plan PAGE 13 | 1. MONARCH GREEN - THE VISION MONARCH GREEN 1.3. THE SITE The site is located within 1.3.1. Bromsgrove is located approximately 1.3.5. The Monarch’s Way footpath runs Worcestershire on the 6.5km to the north west of the site, whereas directly adjacent to and between the site as central Birmingham lies approximately 20km it passes along the south eastern boundary western edge of Redditch, to the north. and Cur Lane. Elsewhere, other public rights approximately 3km west of way can be found within the site near of the town centre. It sits 1.3.2. The ownership area (edged red) the southern boundary of Pumphouse Lane extends to approximately 136.03 hectares and the western boundary of Cur Lane. A across the administrative of agricultural land which falls under the Bridleway also crosses the site connecting boundaries of Redditch control of the applicants. between Cur Lane and Birchfield Lane. Borough Council and 1.3.3. The south eastern edge of the site is Bromsgrove District defined by the residential area of Webheath. VIEWS FROM SOUTH Council. Further north the boundary is formed the TO NORTH A448 dual carriageway. By contrast much of the southern and western boundary is more 1.3.6. The view from south to north shows the rural in character, defined by the hedgerow- site within its context of the residential area lined Cur Lane, Gypsy Lane and the Spring of Webheath to the east and the wider urban Brook.
Recommended publications
  • Employment Land Review 2012

    Employment Land Review 2012

    Bromsgrove District Employment Land Review 2012 December 2012 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Methodology 6 3 Policy Context 15 4 Socio-Economic Context 29 5 Employment Land and Premises – Quantitative Assessment of Supply 31 6 Existing Employment Land & Premises – Qualitative Assessment of Supply 44 7 Overview of Market Demand 87 8 Forecasting Employment Land Requirements – Methodology and Findings 94 9 Findings from the Employer Survey 120 10 Conclusions and Recommendations 150 Bromsgrove District Employment Land Review Executive Summary Drivers Jonas Deloitte and WM Enterprise were initially commissioned by Bromsgrove District Council to prepare an Employment Land Review of the District as part of the Council’s Development Plan evidence base. This Study was published in 2009 and has been updated in mid 2012, in line with progress on the Council’s emerging Bromsgrove District Plan. The study and this update has been carried out in accordance with the following three stage process as advocated in good practice advice issued on behalf of the CLG: Stage 1: Taking stock of the existing employment land situation; Stage 2: Creating a picture of future requirements; and Stage 3: Identifying a new portfolio of sites. For the purposes of this review, the District has been divided into 4 sub-areas, as illustrated on the plan below: 1 Bromsgrove District Employment Land Review Stage 1: The Existing Employment Land Situation Gross employment land supply within Bromsgrove District equates to just over 47 hectares. This figure includes Areas of Development Restraint (several of which now have planning permission for development or are at the pre-application stage) and existing commitments at Ravensbank Business Park (which are intended to meet the employment development needs of Redditch) and Longbridge (which is related to the Birmingham area).
  • NOTICE of ELECTION AGENTS' NAMES and OFFICES Date of Election : Thursday 5 May 2016

    NOTICE of ELECTION AGENTS' NAMES and OFFICES Date of Election : Thursday 5 May 2016

    Redditch Borough Council NOTICE OF ELECTION AGENTS' NAMES AND OFFICES Date of Election : Thursday 5 May 2016 I HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the names and addresses of election agents of the candidates at this election, and the addresses of the offices or places of such election agents to which all claims, notices, writs, summons, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows: Batchley & Brockhill Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate WEBSTER 8 Southcrest Road, Lodge Park, Redditch, Worcs, B98 7JQ GEE Ian David Pamela Ann (Commonly Known As: Ann Gee) HARRIS 51 Church Road, Astwood Bank, Redditch, B96 6DH HARRIS John Leonard John Leonard (Commonly Known As: Len Harris) WITHERSPOON 109 Bromsgrove Road, Redditch, Worcs, B97 4RL LAILEY Pat Patricia Anne (Commonly Known As: Pattie Hill) WAUGH 381 Birchfield Road, Webheath, Redditch, B97 4NE POUND Alistair Derek Steven William (Commonly Known As: Steve Pound) POTTER 4 Acre Lane, Redditch, B97 5WN TORRINGTON Jane Ann Scott Royston Central Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate POTTER 4 Acre Lane, Redditch, B97 5WN AKBAR Jane Ann Salman BLAKE 16 Other Road, St. Georges, Redditch, B98 8DY BLAKE Trevor Stephen Trevor Stephen WAUGH 381 Birchfield Road, Webheath, Redditch, B97 4NE BOWES Alistair Derek Thomas William (Commonly Known As: Tom Bowes) WITHERSPOON 109 Bromsgrove Road, Redditch, Worcs, B97 4RL CHANCE Pat Gregory Phillip (Commonly Known As: Greg Chance) WEBSTER 8 Southcrest Road, Lodge Park, Redditch,
  • Quality As a Space to Spend Time Proximity and Quality of Alternatives Active Travel Networks Heritage Concluaiona Site No. Site

    Quality As a Space to Spend Time Proximity and Quality of Alternatives Active Travel Networks Heritage Concluaiona Site No. Site

    Quality as a space to spend Proximity and quality of Active travel networks Heritage Concluaiona time alternatives GI network (More than 1 of: Activities for different ages/interests Where do spaces currently good level of public use/value, Within such as suitability for informal sports and play/ provide key walking/cycling links? Biodiversity, cta, sports, Public Access Visual interest such as variety and colour Number of other facilities Which sites do or Agricultural Active Travel Networks curtilage/a Historic Local Landscape value variety of routes/ walking routes Level of anti-social behaviour (Public rights of way SSS Conservation Ancient OC Flood Zone In view allotments, significant visual Individual GI Site No. Site Name (Unrestricted, Description of planting, surface textures, mix of green Level of use within a certain distance that could best provide Land SAC LNR LWS (Directly adjacent or djoining In CA? park/garde Heritage Landscape Type of open space in Local Value Further Details/ Sensitivity to Change Summary Opportunities /presence, quality and usage of play and perceptions of safety National Cycle Network I Target Areas Woodlands WS (Worst) cone? interest or townscape protections Limited, Restricted) and blue assets, presence of public art perform the same function alternatives, if any Classification containing a network) listed n Assets this area equipment/ Important local connections importance, significant area of building? presence of interactive public art within Oxford) high flood risk (flood zone 3)) Below ground Above ground archaeology archaeology Areas of current and former farmland surrounded by major roads and edge of city developments, such as hotels, garages and Yes - contains two cycle Various areas of National Cycle Routes 5 and 51 Loss of vegetation to development and Northern Gateway a park and ride.
  • Redditch Circuit Bates Hill

    Redditch Circuit Bates Hill

    WESLEYAN METHODIST HISTORIC ROLL VOLUME 22 REDDITCH CIRCUIT BATES HILL Page 267 YOXALL Richard In Memoriam YOXALL Jane In Memoriam SMALLWOOD James In Memoriam SMALLWOOD Betty In Memoriam YOXALL Henry H Park Road Redditch YOXALL Elizth Park Road Redditch YOXALL Jane E Park Road Redditch YOXALL Annie E Hamilton Road Liverpool YOXALL Alfred Richard In Memoriam PEEL John Oakley Road Redditch PEEL Ann Oakley Road Redditch PEEL Annie Oakley Road Redditch EDKINS Albert E Peakman St Redditch JARVIS William Henry Sunny Bank Redditch JARVIS Lucy Sarah Sunny Bank Redditch JARVIS Constance May Sunny Bank Redditch WILKES William Walker 15 Wellington St Redditch WILKES Hannah 15 Wellington St Redditch In Memoriam WILKES Mary Louisa 15 Wellington St Redditch SIMMONS Wm 14 Unicorn Hill Redditch SIMMONS Sarah Anne 14 Unicorn Hill Redditch SIMMONS Arthur Morley 14 Unicorn Hill Redditch JARVIS William 57 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Sarah Jane 26 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Finemore 26 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Edith Mabel 26 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Reginald George 26 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Leslie Finemore 26 Mount Pleasant Redditch SPENCER Annie Louise In Memoriam SMITH Harriet 12 Smallwood Row DYSON Mary Ann 175 Beoley Road DYSON Emily 175 Beoley Road DYSON Annie Louisa 175 Beoley Road DAYKIN Harry South Street Redditch DAYKIN Gertrude South Street Redditch GAZEY William Skinners St Redditch GARNER Anne 177 Beoley Road SARSONS Fanny Beoley Road Page 268 THOMAS Henry The Laurels Redditch THOMAS Mary Louisa The Laurels Redditch
  • Issues and Options Consultation Document

    Issues and Options Consultation Document

    Contents Introduction 2 Bromsgrove District: An Overview 3 Why do we need to review the District Plan? 4 How will the Review affect the current District Plan policies? 4 National Planning Policy Framework 4 Strategic Planning and the Duty to Cooperate 5 The Plan Review Process 5 Evidence Base 7 Draft Green Belt Purposes Assessment Methodology 7 Draft Site Selection Methodology 7 Scoping and Sustainability Appraisal 9 About this consultation and how to respond 9 Next steps 10 Vision and Objectives of the District Plan 11 Vision 12 Objectives 12 Issues and Options 14 Strategic Issues for Bromsgrove District 16 Housing 26 Employment 34 Transport 41 Town Centre and Local Centres 48 Social Infrastructure 53 Natural and Historic Environments 58 Climate Change and Water Resources 63 Glossary 66 1 Introduction 90% The District covers of the District is In 2016 Bromsgrove 2 designated Green was home to about 217km Belt 96,800 people 2 1.2 The area is well served by motorways, with the M5 running north/south (J4, J4a and J5) and the M42 east/west 1. Introduction (J1, J2 and J3). The M5 and M42 connect with the M6 to the north of Birmingham and M40 to the east. The District also Bromsgrove District: benefits from train and bus connections into Birmingham City Centre and the wider region, and Bromsgrove Town An Overview is only 34km (21 miles) from Birmingham International Airport. 1.1 Bromsgrove District is situated in north Worcestershire and covers approximately 21,714 hectares. Although the 1.3 The main centre of population in Bromsgrove District town is located only 22km (14 miles) from the centre of is Bromsgrove Town with other larger centres being Birmingham, the District is predominantly rural with Alvechurch, Barnt Green, Catshill, Hagley, Rubery, and approximately 90% of the land designated as Green Belt.
  • PDF Timetable

    PDF Timetable

    YOUR BRAND NEW New Timetable 11 DIAMOND 11 SERVICE Redditch to Washford Mill via Webheath, Crabbs Cross & Alexandra Hospital from 29th August 2021 Monday to Saturday Redditch Bus Station 0610 0640 0710 0740 10 40 1710 1740 1810 1840 1910 Tynsall Ave 0615 0645 0715 0745 15 45 1715 1745 1815 1845 1915 a brighter diamond Walkwood, Boulton's Lane 0625 0655 0725 0755 25 55 1725 1755 1825 1855 1925 until Crabbs Cross, Fleece Inn 0628 0658 0728 0758 28 58 1728 1758 1828 1858 1928 Alexandra Hospital 0636 0706 0736 0806 past each hour 36 06 1736 1806 1836 1906 1936 Then at these mins Then at these Redditch to Washford Drive 0639 0709 0739 0809 39 09 1739 1809 1839 1909 1939 Washford Mill Sunday 11 via Webheath, Crabbs Cross Redditch Bus Station 0745 0845 0945 45 1645 1745 1845 & Alexandra Hospital Tynsall Ave 0750 0850 0950 50 1650 1750 1850 Walkwood, Boulton's Lane 0800 0900 1000 00 until 1700 1800 1900 Crabbs Cross, Fleece Inn 0803 0903 1003 03 1703 1803 1903 past each hour Alexandra Hospital 0811 0911 1011 mins Then at these 11 1711 1811 1911 Washford Mill to Redditch via Alexandra Hospital, Crabbs Cross & Webheath Monday to Saturday Washford Drive 0640 0710 0740 0810 40 10 1710 1740 1810 1840 1910 1940 Alexandra Hospital 0644 0714 0744 0814 44 14 1714 1744 1814 1844 1914 1944 Crabbs Cross, Fleece Inn 0652 0722 0752 0822 52 22 1722 1752 1822 1852 1922 1952 until NEW SERVICE Walkwood, Boulton's Lane 0655 0725 0755 0825 55 25 1725 1755 1825 1855 1925 1955 Replaces Services 47 & 48 Tynsall Ave 0705 0735 0805 0835 past each hour 05 35 1735 1805
  • Town Investment Plan (Draft) Redditch Town Deal Board January 2020

    Town Investment Plan (Draft) Redditch Town Deal Board January 2020

    Redditch Town Deal - Town Investment Plan (Draft) Redditch Town Deal Board January 2020 Mott MacDonald 35 Newhall Street Birmingham B3 3PU United Kingdom T +44 (0)121 234 1500 mottmac.com Redditch Town Deal - Town Investment Plan (Draft) Redditch Town Deal Board January 2020 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Redditch Town Deal - Town Investment Plan (Draft) Redditch Town Deal Board Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description 1A 18/12/2020 H Danks/A J Barlow V Hurst Working draft Bennett 1B 23/12/2020 H Danks/A J Barlow V Hurst Revised working draft Bennett 1C 30/12/2020 H Danks NWEDR NWEDR Draft submission for MHCLG 1D 12/01/2020 H Danks/A J Barlow V Hurst Revised draft for RBC Cabinet Bennett Scrutiny. Pre-graphic design Document reference: Click or tap here to enter text.100763 | 1 | A Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property.
  • Worcestershire. [ Kelly's

    Worcestershire. [ Kelly's

    420 GHO WORCESTERSHIRE. [ KELLY'S GROCERS &. TEA DEALERs-continued. Evans Edward, Holloway, Droitwich Harrison Thos.G.17 Unicorn hl.Rddtch Butler William, 5 Causeway Green I'd. Evans E. 66 Halesowen st. Oldbury Harrold John, Long lane, Cakemore, Langley, Birmingham Evans Mrs. E. Severn Stoke,WrcstI' Blackheath, Dudley tCarpent.er Allan C.60 St.Jhn's.Wrcstr Evans Richard, 57 High .street & tHartland Edmund, Worcester street Carrick T. G. 22 High street, Evesham Baldwin road, Stourport & 61 High street, Bromsgrove Cashmore Thos. Webheath, Redditch Evans Mrs. Sarah, Oldbury road, St. Hartwell E. 54 Stourbridge st.Kdmstl' CashIe Charles & Miss Mary Ann, John's, Worcester Hawkeswood Edwd. Overend, Cradley Corse Lawn, Chaseley, Tewkesbury Evans Thomas, 96 Wolverhampton st. Hawkins J.Barnard's grn. Gt. Malvern Cal;well Ann (Miss), I Peel street, Snow hill & 43 New street, Dudley Haylings W. Barnard's gm. Gt. Mlvrn Kidderminster Evans T. M. 43~ Bridge st.Evesham Haynes Isaiah, Alcester st. Redditch ChaloneI' Joseph, 36 Shaw I'd. Dudley Everton C. H. Hanbury st. Droitwich Hehir Henry, Mathon, Great Malvern Chance W. 'H. Vicarage rd.Lye.Strbdg Farmer C. T. Hagley st. Halesowen Hemming .Alfred, Causeway green, tChaplin T. G. 31 Sidbury, Worcester Farmer N. High st. Lye, Stourbridge Langley, Birmingham Church Charles John, Claws top, Bay- Farrington Misses Annie & Maria, 61 Hemming Harry, Overend, Cradley ton, Bewdle Load street, Bewdley tHiggins .Alex. 23 Sidbury, Worcester Clark T. 67 Bath row.Rnd'sgn.Oldby Fawdry W.& Co.II1Astwood I'd.Wrcstr Higgs Banj. 125 Queen's erss. Dudley tClark T. High st. Shipston-on-Stour Findon John, 92 Worcester street, Hill & Reading, I Coventry street !j Clarke C,W'73Coventry st.Kdrmnstr Kidderminster 141 High street, Stourbridge Clarke Mrs.
  • Stratford Upon Avon Parkway Station Prospectus

    Stratford Upon Avon Parkway Station Prospectus

    STATIONS AS PLACES Opportunity Prospectus Integration, Community and Delivery: A Masterplan for Stratford-upon-Avon Parkway station STRATFORD-UPON-AVON PARKWAY STATION May 2020 FOREWORD Introducing the concept of Stations as Places The Stations as Places (SAP) programme is a process to help put railway stations at the heart of local communities. It is designed to create a vision for the future and to identify opportunities for delivering improvements to the local environment and create a welcoming ambience. The aim is to work in partnership with others to unlock potential and to meet shared objectives and aspirations. Railway stations are more than access points to the rail network; they can be hubs of activity that are rooted in the locality with the potential to support regeneration and development opportunities. They can also host community and business activities and offer facilities/infrastructure to encourage sustainable, multi modal travel with a view to reducing car dependency and improving local air quality. The Vision “We will develop stations as quality gateways between communities and the railway, supporting the changing needs of our passengers, residents and visitors. Stations in the West Midlands will be community assets, supporting the wellbeing and development of the areas they serve through involving local community and business.” West Midlands Station Alliance (WMSA) Mission Statement What does the prospectus do for Stratford-upon-Avon Parkway Station? There is an important role for the railways to play in both the economic and social regeneration of the local areas which our stations serve. This Opportunity Prospectus sets out the economic, social and geographic landscape of the area around our station and highlights some of the opportunities for commercial development, partnership working, inward investment and community regeneration.
  • Cross-Boundary Growth of Redditch Borough

    Cross-Boundary Growth of Redditch Borough

    Housing Growth Background Document January 2013 Introduction Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council jointly consulted on cross boundary growth options in 2010. Since then changes to the planning system have meant that both Councils need to work together to find a solution to meet the growth needs of Redditch which cannot all be sustainably accommodated within the Borough. The Councils have agreed to work together to find land within Bromsgrove District, in the vicinity of Redditch Borough, to sustainably accommodate this additional housing growth. This is a non-technical document that has been written to explain how a location has been identified by officers of both authorities to meet this cross-boundary growth. For this reason, technical information is not included but cross-referenced or results summarised in the relevant paragraphs. This document is structured to reflect the process of site selection and the following provides a summary of what each chapter will cover: Chapter Summary 1. Background To explain why cross boundary growth is necessary and how the growth requirements have been determined. This will cover the legislation, planning policies and evidence documents that are relevant to this cross boundary growth issue. 2. Strategic Objectives To identify the Strategic Objectives which site(s) will need to contribute to. 3. Methodology To explain how the site selection process was carried out and the sources of information. 4. Area Assessment Principles To identify the principles that will be used in the area assessment process. 5. Broad Area Appraisal To identify broad area(s) that are more appropriate for accommodating the development in accordance with relevant criteria.
  • Download Consultation Response Document

    Download Consultation Response Document

    First Draft Submission Consultation Consultation Response Document December 2010 1 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 Summary of responses ........................................................................................ 3 General issues.................................................................................................. 3 Setting the Context ........................................................................................... 4 Vision and objectives ........................................................................................ 4 Identification of Areas of Search ....................................................................... 5 Policy proposals ............................................................................................... 6 Full consultation comments and the council's initial response .............................. 7 Overview of Waste Management in Worcestershire ............................................. 8 Question 1: Does the Overview adequately identify the main issues which make the County distinctive? ............................................................................ 8 Question 2: Do you agree with the Broad Geographic Hierarchy.................... 14 Question 3: Do you agree with the figures relating to arising and capacity gap? ....................................................................................................................... 20 Question 4:
  • ANNEX 4A – Email Responses

    ANNEX 4A – Email Responses

    1 ANNEX 4a – Email Responses RESPONDENT VIEW COMMENTS Key Stakeholders/Groups I accept this junction has been closed for a number of weeks due to road maintenance, however any longer- term proposal to restrict vehicular traffic is NOT supported. 1. Emergency response times for ALL Emergency services to this area will increase and detrimental to public Thames Valley Police Object safety. 2. Walton Street is currently a defined Diversion route for Blue light services and other vehicles during closures of St Giles. Alternative Diversions much longer and detrimental in terms of Emergency response to North Oxford. Can see this would be beneficial to the residents of Walton street, I do have some concerns regarding Emergency access. Since the current closure has been in place, we have attended quite a few minor incidents, and the only Fire & Rescue Service, access has been via St Giles and little clarendon street or St Margret’s road for the Hydraulic Platform (due (Rewley Road & Slade Concerns to the size and amount of swing on the vehicle) Park White Watch) Whilst I am not opposed to a temporary traffic closure trial myself, I would personally like the ability to access via a transponder and a bollard or some other mechanism that we could breach? Obviously, a sign would do the same, but would state only emergency vehicles have access. During the current road closures on Walton Street, our appliances have been significantly delayed in attending properties down Walton Street and the surrounding side roads/Port Meadow because of high traffic levels, tight roads for the diversion and the length of time it takes us to get to suitable diversion routes that are listed in the consultation map.