DOCSLIB.ORG

KS' International Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

KS’ International Projects 2016 Annual Report KOMMUNESEKTORENS ORGANISASJON 3 The Norwegian Association of Local And Regional Authorities About KS’ International Projects KS INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS KS International Projects is the international In the outgoing EEA Grants period (2009- unit of The Norwegian Association for Local 2014) KS was Donor Programme Partner and Regional Authorities (KS). The unit (DPP) for capacity-building and institutional receives support from the Norwegian Ministry co-operation in Bulgaria, Hungary, Latvia of Foreign Affairs (NMFA) and the European and Lithuania, as well as in the field of Economic Area (EEA) financial mechanisms children and youth at risk in Estonia. through projects and participation in programmes. KS International Projects The next period runs from 2017 until the end consists of five full-time project managers. of 2021, with the possibility of prolonging Professional expertise from other KS staff projects until 2024. The total budget is €2.8 as well as from KS members is drawn into billion. The donor countries and beneficiary the projects when needed. The international states are at the moment negotiating the project unit also co-operates with other individual content of country-specific relevant organisations and ministries in programmes, but it is already clear that About KS International Projects………………………………………………………………………………........ Norway, depending on the focus and theme KS will be a donor programme partner in of the project. Romania and Bulgaria. In Romania, the Preamble.....................……………………………………………………………………………………………… programme has a budget of €70 million, for Project Overview 2016……………………………………………………………………………………………… EEA AND NORWAY GRANTS Local Development and Enhanced Roma PART 1: Review 2016…………………………………………………………………………………………….. Inclusion. In Bulgaria, the budget is €35 The Grants are the contributions of Iceland, million, for Local Development, Poverty Polish-Norwegian Co-operation Platform for Climate and Energy Efficency............................... Liechtenstein and Norway towards reducing Reduction and Enhanced Inclusion of Lithuania: Local action for better air quality and sustainable energy solutions……………..…... economic and social disparities and Vulnerable Groups. KS may also become strengthening bilateral relations with 15 EU a programme partner or project partner in Local self-governance in Georgia……………………………………………………………………... countries in Central and Southern Europe. other countries under the EEA and Norway Public sector mutual exchange programme between Norway and Russia………………............ Through the European Economic Area Grants. Capacity Building and institutional co-operation with Hungary…………………………............... (EEA) Agreement, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are partners in the Internal NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN Successful local self-governance capacity building in Latvia………………………….................. Market with the 28 EU member states. The AFFAIRS Ukraine’s future stability and local government………………………………………............…...... countries also share common values and responsibilities with other European countries KS has also received funding from the Decent Work and Tripartite Dialogue in EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021………………........ to promote equality of opportunity, tolerance, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs PART 2: General outlook and EEA and Norway Grants 2014-21……………………………………………. security, environmental sustainability and a (NMFA) for numerous co-operation projects. KS advocacy and involvement in international policy formulation.……………………….………. decent standard of living for all. Funds are set Norway has a solid local government sector aside in all beneficiary countries to support and has a lot to offer in helping build strong Relevance of EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 to KS’ long-term strategy………………....... networking and foster project partnerships and stable local democracies in partnership on initiatives of mutual interest. The local government associations in other financial mechanisms are organised around countries. KS International Projects have programmes, with pre-defined projects and NMFA-funded projects in several European open calls under each programme. For more states outside the EU. see www.eeagrants.org. 4 Preamble Many programmes and projects Roma inclusion” programmes in funded by EEA and Norway Grants Romania and Bulgaria. We are in the 2009-2014 were finalised in the past loop for partnering in programmes in year. KS contributed as donor other counties and stand ready in due programme partner to five of those course to become project partners in programmes and to a great many selected pre-defined projects relevant projects from which Norwegian local to local governments. New international governments have been able to draw opportunities for our members to share significant knowledge and new and to learn will open up. competencies. Moreover, our member municipalities have gained valuable Municipalities play a vital role in experience from participating in securing safety, dignity and freedom capacity-building activities with for all citizens in Norway. They play a associations or local governments in key role in implementing many national other member states of the Council of policies. The delivery of services by Europe. local bodies controlled by elected as good practice worth studying in order reduce emissions and limit the impact of institutions in good co-ordination to enhance sustainable development in climate change, and thus contribute to 2016 marked the beginning of a with other tiers of government has other countries on several occasions in meeting the Sustainable Development new EEA and Norway Grants period proven to be an effective, efficient and 2016. Goals’ environmental targets. (2014-2021), with the EU and donors sustainable model for prosperity. (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) The Norwegian local government Nationally, KS is working to strengthen KS wants local governments to play in agreeing to allocate to €2.8 billion system therefore provides examples social inclusion. Education and their role in the new International to reducing economic and social of good practice which are relevant knowledge is a key part of preventing Development Agenda 2030. We there- disparities in Europe as well as to and useful to share as part of Norway’s exclusion. Local governments, being fore contribute to building capacity strengthening co-operation with 15 international engagement for sustain- inclusive democratic institutions close for them to better provide quality EU countries in Central and Southern able development. to and mandated by citizens, can services and be accountable for their Europe and the Baltics. Negotiations provide an excellent opportunity to actions. Access to experiences and towards Memoranda of Understanding In the past year, KS actively advocated offer inclusive education and other good practices from other countries with beneficiary states opened from for a stronger role for local government services which will prevent future is helpful. KS is proud to contribute June 2016. Priority sectors and in efforts to achieve the Sustainable exclusion, thus also preventing future to the international development programme areas were agreed after Development Goals. Goal 17 calls increases in social benefit costs. agenda for the benefit of Norwegian extensive consultations in September for stronger partnerships between local governments and their counter- 2016. Romania concluded the first different stakeholders. KS promotes In the Paris Accord on Climate Change parts in other countries and for better beneficiary negotiations and signed its co-operation between different tiers of concluded in 2015, local governments and more easily assessable inclusive agreement in October 2016. government. We represent Norway’s were recognised for their role in both services to citizens around the globe. local governments in formalised the prevention of and adaptation to KS has already been selected as donor consultation with the Norwegian climate change. Local governments in Gunn Marit Helgesen programme partner for “local develop- government. This well-established their function as planners and societal President of KS ment, poverty reduction and enhanced consultation system was put forward developers can help to significantly 6 7 Projects Overview 2016 Country Project Partners Funding to KS Country Project Partners Funding to KS Bulgaria Donor Programme Partner for the programme Technical Assistance Directorate, the Norway Grants Lithuania Pre-defined project for sustainable energy and Association of Local Authorities in Norway Grants Capacity-Building and Institutional Co-operation Council of Ministers of the Republic environmental quality management in local Lithuania between Bulgarian and Norwegian Public of Bulgaria €30 000 for 2016 governments €28 000 for 2016 Institutions, Local and Regional Authorities Bulgaria Strengthening the Capacity of the National Asso- The National Association of Bulgarian Norway Grants Moldova Effective, Consultative and Devolved Governance Congress of Local Governments of NMFA ciation of Bulgarian Municipalities and Bulgarian Municipalities and Regions - NAMRB in Moldova Moldova Municipalities through Co-operation with Norwe- €185 000 for 2009- €190 000 for 2016 gian Local Authorities 2014/16 Poland Building competences for inter-municipal and Association of Polish Cities in co- EEA Grants Estonia Donor Programme Partner for Children and Youth Estonian Ministry of Education
Recommended publications
  • Beredskapsområdene Vi Har 70 Beredskapsområder

    Beredskapsområdene Vi Har 70 Beredskapsområder

    Beredskapsområdene Vi har 70 beredskapsområder. Oversikten under viser hvilke kommuner som hører til hvilket område. Mange av beredskapsområdene sammenfaller med prostigrensene. Beredskap 1: Oslo 1: Nordstrand, Østensjø, Søndre Nordstrand, Stovner, Grorud, Alna, Bjerke Beredskap 2: Oslo 2: Gamle Oslo, Sentrum, Frogner, St. Hanshaugen, Vestre Aker, Ullern, Nordre Aker, Sagene, Grünerløkka Beredskap 3: Asker, Bærum Beredskap 4: Eidsvoll, Gjerdrum, Hurdal, Nannestad, Ullensaker, Aurskog-Høland, Fet, Nes, Sørum, Lørenskog, Nittedal, Rælingen, Skedsmo Beredskap 5: Enebakk, Oppegård, Ski, Frogn, Nesodden, Vestby, Ås, Hobøl, Moss, Rygge, Råde, Skiptvet, Spydeberg, Våler Beredskap 6: Fredrikstad, Hvaler, Halden, Sarpsborg, Aremark, Askim, Eidsberg, Marker, Rakkestad, Rømskog, Trøgstad Beredskap 7: Hamar, Løten, Stange, Ringsaker Beredskap 8: Eidskog, Grue, Kongsvinger, Sør-Odal, Våler, Åsnes Beredskap 9: Elverum, Engerdal, Stor-Elvdal, Trysil, Åmot Beredskap 10: Alvdal, Folldal, Os, Rendalen, Tolga, Tynset Beredskap 11: Etnedal, Nord-Aurdal, Sør-Aurdal, Vang, Vestre Slidre, Øystre Slidre, Nord-Odal Beredskap 12: Gausdal, Lillehammer, Ringebu, Sør-Fron, Øyer Beredskap 13: Dovre, Lesja, Lom, Nord-Fron, Sel, Skjåk, Vågå Beredskap 14: Gjøvik, Vestre Toten, Østre Toten, Gran, Jevnaker, Lunner, Nordre Land, Søndre Land Beredskap 15: Flå, Gol, Hemsedal, Hol, Nes, Ål Beredskap 16: Flesberg, Kongsberg, Nore og Uvdal, Rollag Beredskap 17: Hole, Ringerike, Modum, Krødsherad, Sigdal Beredskap 18: Drammen, Hurum, Lier, Røyken, Øvre Eiker, Nedre Eiker, Svelvik
  • Particle Separation

    Particle Separation

    COMPACT, EFFICIENT PARTICLE SEPARATION www.krugerkaldnes.no Unique separation equipment The MUSLING® flotation equipment was developed during the 1980’s originally for removing fat and oil from fish-processing sewage outlets. Now, after more than 20 years experience, the MUSLING® has become synonymous with the treatment for both industrial and communal sewage systems. MUSLING® continually separates particles from all types of flowing liquids. Its unique hydraulic design produces a maximum flotation effect. The MUSLING® flotation efficiency is the result of a hydraulic action that influences the velocity and direction of the liquid so that particle matter becomes separated at the surface. High capacity One of the many advantages of the MUSLING® is that it can handle a large flow of liquid in a relatively small space. It can separate particle matter at surface speeds of up to 15 m/h. The result - equipment that is compact, efficient and extremely cost- effective The MUSLING® can be used for the treatment of all forms of liquid-flow systems including traditional sewage cleaning, drinking water treatment, industrial outlet separation and recycling plants where products can be extracted and returned to the production process. An environmental advantage The MUSLING® can be used as a pure mechanical plant for the removal of fat and oils. On the other hand it can be part of a chemical cleaning system or a biological treatment process. The common factor here is that the MUSLING® is always the particle-removal element. An outside influence on the separation process The flotation particle separation process of is often dependent on what is called “dispersion”.
  • Møtereferat (DGI)

    Møtereferat (DGI)

    Dato 09.10.2012 Referat Tid 10 – 13:30 Faggruppe Vann og Avløp Møte nr. 2. Sted Ullensaker Rådhus Møte innkalt av: Kristian Moseby (prosjektleder) Møtedeltakere:, Gorm Gullberg (Rygge kommune), Marie Strand (Ullensaker), Leiv Knutson (Nes), Mona Ellingsen (Nes), Simon Haraldsen (Fylkesmannen i Oslo og Akershus), Harald Foss (Trøgstad), Kjersti Vik Strandli (Ullensaker) Henning Colbjørnsen (Rælingen), Anne-Marie Heidenreich (Enebakk), Kristian Moseby (Prosjektleder). Ikke møtt: Aurskog- Høland, Eidsberg, Eidsvoll, Nord-Odal, Sør-Odal, Fet, Spydeberg, Sørum og Akershus Fylkeskommune. Referent: Kristian Moseby Møteagenda 1. Velkommen og godkjenning av dagsorden / referat 2. Innlegg - Gorm Gullberg (Rygge kommune) - Opprydding i spredt avløp i Morsa 3. Innlegg - Ullensaker kommune – opprydding i spredt avløp 4. Kommunene orienterer kort om hvordan de dokumenterer sine utslipp 5. Eventuelt 6. Neste møte 1. Velkommen, godkjenning av referat og dagsorden Ansvarlig Frist Det var ingen merknader til referat fra møte 30.5.2012, dagsorden ble godkjent. I tillegg til punkt 4 ble det tatt med at kommunene informerer om de har lokale forskrifter i tilknytning til avløp. 2. Innlegg v/ Gorm Gullberg (Rygge kommune) – Opprydding i spredt avløp i Morsa Vannområde Morsa ligger nesten utelukkende under marin grense og består av 8 kommuner der innsjøen Vansjø er hovedresipient, som også er drikkevannskilde. Innsjøen har tidvis hatt omfattende algeoppblomstringsproblematikk med etterfølgende badeforbud. Status for Morsas 2000 spredte avløpsanlegg ble kartlagt av UMB studenter i 1997- 1999. Dataene ble lagt inn i WebGis Avløp. Det viste seg at mer enn 50 % av anleggene ikke fungerte tilfredsstillende. Morsa utarbeidet en tiltaksanalyse i 2001, som ble et meget viktig dokument i det videre arbeidet.
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
  • Edu Immigration ACCEPTED.Pdf (882.2Kb)

    Edu Immigration ACCEPTED.Pdf (882.2Kb)

    ARTICLE Does education affect immigration attitudes? Evidence from an education reform / Henning Finseraas, Øyvind Søraas Skorge, Marte Strøm VERSION: POST PRINT/GREEN OPEN ACCESS This document is the author’s post print (final accepted version). The document is archived in the institutional archive of Institute for Social Research. The final publication is available in: Electoral Studies 2018, / DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.06.009 does education affect immigration attitudes? Evidence from an education reform∗ Henning Finseraas,y Øyvind Skorge,z and Marte Strømx Accepted for publication in Electoral Studies July 2, 2018 Abstract Empirical research consistently finds that people with high education have more liberal immigration attitudes. To what extent this relationship reflects a causal effect of education is, however, largely unknown. We rely on the staggered introduction of a major Norwegian education reform to get exogenous variation in respondents’ level of education. The reform lifted the bottom of the education distribution by increasing the compulsory years of education by two years. We find no significant differences in immigration attitudes between those who were educated in the old and the new education system. Our results suggest that if education has a causal effect on immigration attitudes, it is likely to operate on other education margins. ∗We would like to thank seminar participants at the Institute for Social Research, Frisch Center for Economic Research, and University of Bergen for comments on a previous draft of the paper. Funding from the Research Council of Norway is acknowledged (grant no. 270687). yInstitute for Social Research, Oslo, P.O. Box 3233 Elisenberg, 0208 Oslo, Norway.
  • Forskrift Om Skolerute for Viken Skoleåret 2021-2022

    Forskrift Om Skolerute for Viken Skoleåret 2021-2022

    Forskrift om skolerute for Viken skoleåret 2021-2022 Forskrift gitt med hjemmel i opplæringslovens §3-2. Vedtatt av fylkestinget i Viken fylkeskommune dato 21.oktober 2020 Skoleruta for skoleåret 2021-2022 for skoler i Hurdal, Eidsvoll, Nes, Aurskog-Høland, Marker, Aremark, Halden, Hvaler, Sarpsborg, Rakkestad, Fredrikstad, Råde, Moss, Våler, Skiptvedt, Indre Østfold, Vestby, Ås, Frogn, Nesodden, Nordre Follo, Enebakk, Lørenskog, Rælingen, Lillestrøm, Nittedal, Gjerdrum, Ullensaker, Nannestad, Asker og Bærum Skoledager elever Ferier, fridager, kommentarer August 10 Første skoledag: uke 33, onsdag 18.08 September 22 Oktober 16 Høstferie: uke 40: f.o.m. mandag 04.10 t.o.m. fredag 08.10 November 21 Onsdag 17.11 Fri for elever, felles plandag for lærere Desember 15 Juleferie f.o.m. onsdag 22.12 Januar 21 Juleferie t.o.m. søndag 02.01 Februar 15 Vinterferie uke 8: f.o.m. mandag 21.02 t.o.m. fredag 25.02 Mars 23 April 15 Påskeferie f.o.m lørdag 09.04 t.o.m. mandag 18.04 Mai 20 Fri/helgedag: 17.05, 26.05 Juni 12 Fri 06.06 Siste skoledag: fredag 17.06 Sum 190 Offentlige fridager: Søndag 01.05 Tirsdag 17.05 Torsdag 26.05 Kr. Himmelfartsdag Mandag 06.06 2. pinsedag Oslo, 25.06.2020 Skoleruta for skoleåret 2021-2022 for skoler i Hemsedal, Gol, Ål, Nes i Hallingdal, Hol, Nore og Uvdal, Modum, Flå, Ringerike, Hole, Krødsherad, Sigdal, Rollag, Flesberg, Øvre Eiker, Kongsberg, Drammen, Lier, Jevnaker og Lunner Skoledager elever Ferier, fridager, kommentarer August 10 Første skoledag: uke 33, onsdag 18.08 September 22 Oktober 16 Høstferie: uke 40: f.o.m.
  • 1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    1768-1830S a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate

    A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Washington, DC December 17, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Andrew Robarts All Rights Reserved ii A PLAGUE ON BOTH HOUSES?: POPULATION MOVEMENTS AND THE SPREAD OF DISEASE ACROSS THE OTTOMAN-RUSSIAN BLACK SEA FRONTIER, 1768-1830S Andrew Robarts, M.S.F.S. Dissertation Advisor: Catherine Evtuhov, Ph. D. ABSTRACT Based upon a reading of Ottoman, Russian, and Bulgarian archival documents, this dissertation examines the response by the Ottoman and Russian states to the accelerated pace of migration and spread of disease in the Black Sea region from the outbreak of the Russo-Ottoman War of 1768-1774 to the signing of the Treaty of Hünkar Iskelesi in 1833. Building upon introductory chapters on the Russian-Ottoman Black Sea frontier and a case study of Bulgarian population movements between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, this dissertation analyzes Russian and Ottoman migration and settlement policies, the spread of epidemic diseases (plague and cholera) in the Black Sea region, the construction of quarantines and the implementation of travel document regimes. The role and position of the Danubian Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia as the “middle ground” between the Ottoman and Russian Empires
  • Transformation and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe & Russia

    Transformation and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe & Russia

    PERPETUAL MOTION? Transformation and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe & Russia Edited by TUL’SI BHAMBRY, CLARE GRIFFIN, TITUS HJELM, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON AND OLGA G. VORONINA Papers from the 9th International Postgraduate Conference held at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL 2011 PERPETUAL MOTION? TRANSFORMATION AND TRANSITION IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA EDITED BY TUL’SI BHAMBRY, CLARE GRIFFIN, TITUS HJELM, CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON AND OLGA G. VORONINA Studies in Russia and Eastern Europe No. 8 ISBN: 978-0-903425-85-8 Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Tul’si Bhambry, Clare Griffin, Titus Hjelm, Christopher Nicholson and Olga G. Voronina 2011. Individual chapters © contributors 2011 All rights reserved. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Contents List of Tables and Figures iv Acknowledgements v Introduction vi Minorities and Human Rights 1. Categorisation and Instruction: IOM’s Role in Preventing Human Trafficking in the Russian Federation 2 Susanne Schatral 2. Ethno-business - the Manipulation of Minority Rights in Romania and Hungary 16 Andreea Carstocea Spaces, Regions, Borders 3. Working the Field: Rural Experts and the ‘Agrarian Question’ in the Romanian Principalities 1864-1914 30 Raluca Muşat 4. The Role of the ‘Agrarian overpopulation’ in German Spatial and Economic Planning for South-East Europe before and during the Second World War 43 Ian Innerhofer 5. Europeanisation and The Built Environment: The Re-scaling of the Border City Goerlitz-Zgorzelec 57 Siarhei Liubimau 6.
  • Hvaler Menighetsblad 2020 Nr. 4.Pdf

    Hvaler Menighetsblad 2020 Nr. 4.Pdf

    Nr. 4 - Advent 2020 - 73. årgang Hvaler Menighetsblad Innholdsfortegnelse Julehilsen fra Grethe . 3 Menighetsrådet melder . 4 Menighetsrådets leder har ordet . 5 Biskopens julehilsen . 6 Ordføreren har ordet . 8 Advent og jul i Hvalerkirkene . 9 Under himmelbuen . 10 M/S Sandø av Halden . 12 Kunstlotteriet . 15 Arkimedesskruen i Arekilen . 16 Brudestolene i Hvaler kirke . 18 Barnedåp 1942 . 20 En dråpe i havet . 22 Ekstraordinært menighetsmøte . 23 Julekonsert i Hvaler kirke 22 .desember . 24 Alpefiol . 25 På to hjul med post og omsorg . 26 Konfirmantene i Hvaler 2020 . 28 Normisjon . 30 Når gode krefter slår seg sammen . 31 Juleevangeliet . 32 Indigo Velvære . 34 Konfirmantlørdag og fargeglade Zatter . 36 H .C . Andersen og julehjertet . 38 Lag ditt eget julehjerte . 39 Bestemormysteriet . 40 Bøker til fireåringer . 42 Puttenlegatet . 43 Konsert i Hvaler kirke med Soli trio . 44 Juletrefest på Helligtrekongersdag . 45 Barn og unge - hva skjer? . 46 Siden sist . 48 Julekonsert 29 . november i Spjærøy kirke . 49 Korsang og korona . 50 Fra foreningslivet . 60 Sorg og glede i våre kirker . 61 Gudstjenester vinteren 2021 . 62 Infoside om Hvaler menighet . 63 Foto side 2: Einar Morland Tegning forside: H. Hofmann 1887 Julehilsen fra Grethe Grethe Hummel «Forandring fryder» heter det i et gammelt konserter og andre arrangementer med færre ordtak . Endringer i livet kan være godt og gi deltakere . rom for nye muligheter . Men det gjelder kanskje ikke for julen og julefeiringen? Alt blir ikke helt som i fjor, men det kan bli bra allikevel . Når jeg skriver dette, har statsministeren igjen varslet nye tiltak for å redusere smitten Livet er fullt av endringer og omstillinger .
  • Hva Er Viktig for Deg-Dagen 6. Juni 2018

    Hva Er Viktig for Deg-Dagen 6. Juni 2018

    1 Summary ‘What matters to you?’ day in Norway 2019 ks.no/pasientforlop 27.06.2019 2 Background • It started in Norway in 2014. Participants in Gode pasientforløp (Learning networks for whole, coordinated and safe pathways in the municipalities) were very positive about the ‘ What matters to you? ’ message, and it was decided to conduct such a day in Norway. • Gode pasientforløp is carried out by KS (The Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities) in collaboration with NIPH (the Norwegian Institute of Public Health). • An article in the New England journal of Medicine i 2012 introduced the question ‘What matters to you?’ • One of the goals in Gode pasientforløp is to strengthen the role of the user in improvement of patient pathways. 27.06.2019 3 Buttons • KS has distributed 60,605 buttons to 172 municipalities (of a total of 422), including all 15 districts in Oslo in 2019 • 31 hospitals have also ordered buttons and celebrated the day • A total of approx. 200,000 buttons has been distributed since 2014 The first buttons New design in 2017 Norway has two written standard, and in 2018 we also offered buttons in Nynorsk as well as in Sami language. 27.06.2019 4 The Ministry of Health and Care Services produced their own film 27.06.2019 5 ‘What matters to you?’ films Gode pasientforløp have produced several short videos where the participants either receives or gives health care services • Solveig* – approx. 9,2 k views på FB • Silje – approx. 8,2 k views på FB • Marius* – approx. 2,6 k views på FB • Gro* • Torbjørn In addition a longer film* (4:23) with excerpts from all the individual films has been produced * English subtitles 27.06.2019 6 Activities all over Norway Sør-Varanger Municipality Åsnes Municipality 27.06.2019 7 Activities all over Norway, contd.
  • Rik På Historie - Et Riss Av Kulturhistoriens Fysiske Spor I Bærum

    Rik På Historie - Et Riss Av Kulturhistoriens Fysiske Spor I Bærum

    Rik på historie - et riss av kulturhistoriens fysiske spor i Bærum Regulering Natur og Idrett Forord Velkommen til en reise i Bærums rike kulturarv, - fra eldre Det er viktig at vi er bevisst våre kulturhistoriske, arki- steinalder, jernalder, middelalder og frem til i dag. Sporene tektoniske og miljømessige verdier, både av hensyn til vår etter det våre forfedre har skapt finner vi igjen over hele kulturarv og identitet, men også i en helhetlig miljø- og kommunen. Gjennom ”Rik på historie” samles sporene fra ressursforvaltning. vår arv mellom to permer - for å leses og læres. Heftet, som er rikt illustrert med bilder av kjente og mindre Sporene er ofte uerstattelige. Også de omgivelsene som kjente kulturminner og -miljøer, er full av historiske fakta kulturminnene er en del av kan være verdifulle. I Bærum og krydret med små anekdoter. Redaksjonsgruppen, som består kulturminner og kulturmiljøer av om lag 750 eien- består av Anne Sofie Bjørge, Tone Groseth, Ida Haukeland dommer, som helt eller delvis er regulert til bevaring, og av Janbu, Elin Horn, Gro Magnesen og Liv Frøysaa Moe har ca 390 fredete kulturminner. utarbeidet det spennende og innsiktsfulle heftet. I ”Rik på historie” legger forfatterne vekt på å gjenspeile Jeg håper at mange, både unge og eldre, lar seg inspirere til å kommunens særpreg og mangfold. Heftet viser oss hvordan bli med på denne reisen i Bærums rike historie. utviklingen har påvirket utformingen av bygninger og anlegg, og hvordan landskapet rundt oss er endret. Lisbeth Hammer Krog Det som gjør “Rik på historie” særlig interessant er at den er Ordfører i Bærum delt inn i både perioder og temaer.
  • Supplementary File for the Paper COVID-19 Among Bartenders And

    Supplementary File for the Paper COVID-19 Among Bartenders And

    Supplementary file for the paper COVID-19 among bartenders and waiters before and after pub lockdown By Methi et al., 2021 Supplementary Table A: Overview of local restrictions p. 2-3 Supplementary Figure A: Estimated rates of confirmed COVID-19 for bartenders p. 4 Supplementary Figure B: Estimated rates of confirmed COVID-19 for waiters p. 4 1 Supplementary Table A: Overview of local restrictions by municipality, type of restriction (1 = no local restrictions; 2 = partial ban; 3 = full ban) and week of implementation. Municipalities with no ban (1) was randomly assigned a hypothetical week of implementation (in parentheses) to allow us to use them as a comparison group. Municipality Restriction type Week Aremark 1 (46) Asker 3 46 Aurskog-Høland 2 46 Bergen 2 45 Bærum 3 46 Drammen 3 46 Eidsvoll 1 (46) Enebakk 3 46 Flesberg 1 (46) Flå 1 (49) Fredrikstad 2 49 Frogn 2 46 Gjerdrum 1 (46) Gol 1 (46) Halden 1 (46) Hemsedal 1 (52) Hol 2 52 Hole 1 (46) Hurdal 1 (46) Hvaler 2 49 Indre Østfold 1 (46) Jevnaker1 2 46 Kongsberg 3 52 Kristiansand 1 (46) Krødsherad 1 (46) Lier 2 46 Lillestrøm 3 46 Lunner 2 46 Lørenskog 3 46 Marker 1 (45) Modum 2 46 Moss 3 49 Nannestad 1 (49) Nes 1 (46) Nesbyen 1 (49) Nesodden 1 (52) Nittedal 2 46 Nordre Follo2 3 46 Nore og Uvdal 1 (49) 2 Oslo 3 46 Rakkestad 1 (46) Ringerike 3 52 Rollag 1 (52) Rælingen 3 46 Råde 1 (46) Sarpsborg 2 49 Sigdal3 2 46 Skiptvet 1 (51) Stavanger 1 (46) Trondheim 2 52 Ullensaker 1 (52) Vestby 1 (46) Våler 1 (46) Øvre Eiker 2 51 Ål 1 (46) Ås 2 46 Note: The random assignment was conducted so that the share of municipalities with ban ( 2 and 3) within each implementation weeks was similar to the share of municipalities without ban (1) within the same (actual) implementation weeks.