DOCSLIB.ORG

Tires for Trimet's Non-Revenue Vehicles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tires for Trimet's Non-Revenue Vehicles ITB No.: BO190226LJ TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON INVITATION TO BID FOR TIRES FOR TRIMET’S NON-REVENUE VEHICLES (NRVs) ADDENDUM #1 The following changes, clarifications and TriMet responses to questions posed to date are hereby provided to all bidders: Question: 1. Is there a vehicle list available for the NRV's showing the specific vehicle these tires are going on, or a list of the Load/Ply rating of the tires on this list; something to help us determine the load rating/ply rating needed for the Passenger and Light Truck tires listed? Answer: Please see attached Tire Size by Vehicle List Bidders are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this Addendum on Bid Form 1.1.2 – Receipt of Addenda when submitting/uploading their bid package. NO OTHER CHANGES TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON BY: Linda Joy Issue Date: May 8, 2019 Contract Administrator Procurement & Supply Chain Mgmt. Addendum #1 Tire Size by Vehicle ITB No. BO190226LJ VEH # Year Make Model VIN Tire Size 104 2007 FORD F-350 CREW SERVICE TRUCK 1FTWW32Y77EA38383 245/75/17 188 1993 GMC C7000 TOPKICK C SERIES (SAND TRUCK) 1GDM7H1J0PJ517527 11R/22.5 203 1986 FORD KNUCKLE CRANE TRUCK 1FDYK87U9HVA01937 295/75/22.5 501 2009 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID 1FMCU49329KA28885 235/70/16 503 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53FX96200244 235/60/17 504 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53F496241372 235/60/17 506 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53F796241754 235/60/17 508 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53F496241968 235/60/17 509 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53F296241967 235/60/17 510 2009 CHEVY EQUINOX LT 4-DOOR CROSSOVER 2CNDL53F996241965 235/60/17 512 2012 FORD ESCAPE XLT 4WD 1FMCU9DG4CKB33698 235/70/16 515 2012 FORD ESCAPE XLT 4WD 1FMCU9DG0CKB33696 235/70/16 521 2012 JEEP LIBERTY SPORT 4X4 1C4PJMAK7CW218540 235/70/16 601 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25C691153207 245/75/16 603 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25CX91153310 245/75/16 604 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25C091153218 245/75/16 605 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25C891153659 245/75/16 606 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25C991154044 245/75/16 607 2009 CHEVY EXPRESS CARGO VAN 1GCGG25C491153240 245/75/16 612 2007 FORD ESCAPE CROSSOVER 1FMCU92Z17KA35304 225/75/15 614 2012 FORD ESCAPE XLT 4WD 1FMCU9DG2CKB92247 235/70/16 615 2012 FORD ESCAPE XLT 1FMCU0D76CKC46421 235/70/16 620 2012 JEEP LIBERTY SPORT 4X4 1C4PJMAK2CW215495 225/75/16 621 2012 JEEP PATRIOT SPORT 4X4 1C4NJRBB9CD638282 215/65/17 703 2009 FORD F-250 SUPERDUTY PICKUP 1FTSX20569EA47772 245/75/17 704 2009 FORD F-250 SUPERDUTY PICKUP 1FTSX20589EA47773 245/75/17 705 2009 FORD E-350 CARGO VAN (BUCKET) 1FTSE34L49DA56819 245/75/16 843 1996 FORD 1 TON HIGH CUBE VAN SIGNALS 1FDKE37H7SHB74946 225/75/16 857 1997 FORD ECONOLINE VAN 1FTJE34L3VHB26860 245/75/16 859 1997 FORD RADIO VAN (E30Q) 1FDJE30S1VHB78139 245/75/16 883 1997 FORD 1 TON VAN (FACILITY MAINT.) 1FTJE34L3VHB23960 245/75/16 887 1997 CHEVY VAN (PLANT MECHANICS) 1GBKP32R5V3300399 225/70/19.5 900 2009 GMC 5500 TOPKICK 4X4 1GDE5C3989F402325 245/70/19.5 1001 1998 FORD 3/4 TON VAN (SUBSTATION) 1FTNE2426WHB67259 245/75/16 1032 1999 FORD PICK UP TRUCK 1FTSF31L4XEB65886 26S/75/16 1044 1998 DODGE New Eng UTILITYBOX TRUCK 4X2 3B6MC3651WM282379 215/85/16 1046 1999 FORD OCS PLATFORM TRUCK 1FDYF70J8WVA11130 11R/22.5 1053 1998 BRANDT CAR MOVER - POWER UNIT 2WLPCCJ2XK956176 445/65/22.5 1061 1999 GMC SAVANNA (RADIO/ELEC.) 1GDHG31R1X1061824 245/75/16 1065 1999 GMC 1 TON STAKE BODY TRUCK 1GDJC34F9XF087704 225/75/16 1068 1999 FORD F-350 1 TON TRUCK (HI-RAIL) 1FTSW31F1XEE53407 245/70/19.5 1071 1999 CHEVY BUCKET TRUCK 1GBM7HIC9XJ105326 11R/22.5 1074 2000 FORD 1 TON W/HYDRO PRE WASH 1FTSX30L8YEC67711 265/75/16 1081 2000 CHEVY C7H042 (HI-RAIL PLATFORM TRUCK) 1GBM7H1C6YJ500355 11R/22.5 1082 2000 CHEVY C70 (HI-RAIL BUCKET TRUCK) 1GBM7H1C5YJ502310 11R/22.5 1090 2001 FORD (F-350 PICK UP) DUALLY 1FTWX33L91ED80148 235/85/16 1091 2001 FORD F-350 EXTENDED CAB DUALLY 1FTWX33L01ED80149 235/85/16 1105 1991 CHEVY GRUMMEN VAN (TICKET BOOTH) 1GBHP32K7M3303140 235/85/16 1124 2002 FORD E-350 CEDAR MILL SHUTTLE VAN 1FDSS34L72HB20533 245/75/16 1124 2002 FORD E-350 CEDAR MILL SHUTTLE VAN 1FDSS34L72HB20533 245/75/16 1139 2002 GMC DUMP TRUCK, HI-RAIL 1GDT7H4C92J511873 315/80/22.5 1143 2003 FORD HI-CUBE VAN 1FDXE45S73HA31605 225/75/16 Addendum #1_BO190226LJ 1 of 3 Addendum #1 Tire Size by Vehicle ITB No. BO190226LJ VEH # Year Make Model VIN Tire Size 1144 2003 TYMCO STREET SWEEPER 1FVAB6BV54DM31611 11R/22.5 1145 2013 FORD F-250 SUPERCAP SD PICKUP 4x4 1FT7X2BT5DEA05202 245/75/17 1146 2013 FORD E-350 VAN 1FTSE3ELODDA22318 245/75/16 1149 2013 FORD F-550 SERVICE BODY 4X4 SUPERCAB 1FD0X5HT1DEA05204 225/70/19.5 1150 2013 FORD F-550 SERVICE BODY w/MANLIFT 1FD0X5HTXDEA05203 225/70/19.5 1151 2014 FORD F-550 SERVICE BODY 4X4 SUPERCAB 1FD0X5HTXEEB28162 225/70/19.5 1152 2014 FORD F-350 4X4 SUPERCAB 1FT8X3B64EEB28155 245/75/17 1154 2014 FORD F-350 4X4 SUPERCAB 1FT8X3B68EEB28157 245/75/17 1158 2014 FORD F-450 4X4 CHASSIS CAB 1FD9X4HT6EEB28161 225/70/19.5 1163 2014 FORD E350 CARGO VAN 1FTSE3EL0EDA46992 245/75/16 1164 2014 FORD E350 CARGO VAN 1FTSE3EL4EDA46994 245/75/16 1166 2014 FORD E350 CARGO VAN 1FTSE3EL7EDA46990 245/75/16 1169 2014 FORD E350 CARGO VAN 1FTSE3ELXEDA46997 245/75/16 1170 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B81EGB43972 245/65/17 1172 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B87EGB43975 245/65/17 1175 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B84EGB43979 245/65/17 1176 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B80EGB43980 245/65/17 1178 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B84EGB43982 245/65/17 1180 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B8XEGB43971 245/65/17 1182 2014 FORD EXPLORER 4X4 (Base Model) 1FM5K8B82EGB43978 245/65/17 1183 2014 FORD F150 SUPERCAB 4X4 1FTEX1EM0EFA71285 245/70/17 1184 2014 FORD F150 SUPERCAB 4X4 1FTEX1EM2EFA71286 235/75/17 1192 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van SWB NM0LS6F77E1140611 215/55/16 1193 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van SWB NM0LS6F79E1140612 215/55/16 1194 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F77E1148159 215/55/16 1197 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F74E1148149 215/55/16 1198 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F7XE1148155 215/55/16 1202 2004 INTERNATIONAL TOW TRUCK 1HTWCADN34J093502 11R/22.5 1205 2013 PETERBILT 337 CARGO TRUCK/MONEY VAULT 2NP2HM6X3EM224914 295/75/22.5 1206 2013 FORD EXPLORER FWD 4DR BASE 1FM5K7B89DGC25134 245/65/17 1207 2013 FREIGHTLINER SPRINTER WDYPF4CC1D5779013 215/85/16 1208 2014 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F73E1148160 215/55/16 1209 2015 FORD F250 SUPERCAB 4X2 {PLMR} 1FT7X2A62FEA46918 245/75/17 1210 2015 FORD F250 SUPERCAB 4X2 {PLMR} 1FT7X2A64FEA46919 245/75/17 1219 2015 FORD TRANSIT WAGON 15 PASSENGER 1FBVU4XGFKA95006 195/75/16c 1221 2015 FORD TRANSIT WAGON 15 PASSENGER 1FBVU4XG2FKA95005 195/75/16c 1222 2015 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT WAGON CARGO NM0LS6E78F1210023 215/55/16 1223 2015 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT WAGON CARGO SWB NM0LS6E77F1209980 215/55/16 1227 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F7XF1214852 215/55/16 1228 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F73F1214840 215/55/16 1229 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Pass Van SWB NM0AS8F74F1214832 215/55/16 1232 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van LWB NM0LS7E74F1219985 215/55/16 1234 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van SWB NM 0L27E75F1219980 215/55/16 1235 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van SWB NMOLS7E75F1219977 215/55/16 1236 2015 FORD Transit Connect XLT Cargo Van SWB NMOLS7E76F1219972 215/55/16 1237 2015 FORD Explorer 4dr 4x4 1FM5K8B84GGA78330 245/60/18 1241 2015 FORD Explorer 4dr 4x4 1FM5K8B86GGA78331 245/60/18 1241 2015 FORD Explorer 4dr 4x4 1FM5K8B86GGA78331 245/60/18 1242 2016 FORD F450 CrewCab 4x4 DRW ServiceBody 176" WB 1FD9W4HY6GEB17999 225/70/19.5 1243 2016 FORD F450 CrewCab 4x4 DRW ServiceBody 176" WB 1FD9W4HY7GEB18000 225/70/19.5 1244 2016 FORD F450 CrewCab 4x4 DRW ServiceBody 176" WB 1FD9W4HY9GEB18001 225/70/19.5 1249 2016 FORD F450 CrewCab 4x4 DRW Landscaper Lift 176" WB 1FDOW4HY7GEB43844 225/70/19.5 Addendum #1_BO190226LJ 2 of 3 Addendum #1 Tire Size by Vehicle ITB No. BO190226LJ VEH # Year Make Model VIN Tire Size 1251 2016 FORD Transit T-350 HD Extended 1FTRS4XG6GKB03143 195/75/16c 1254 2016 FORD Transit T-350 HD Extended 1FTRS4XG4GKB03142 195/75/16c 1256 2016 FORD F-150 4X4 Supercab Long-Bed 1FTFX1EG8GKE19228 265/70/17 1259 2016 FORD F250 SUPERCAB 4X4 Reg Bed 1FT7X2B67GEC57838 245/75/17 1260 2016 FORD F250 SUPERCAB 4X4 Reg Bed 1FT7X2B65GEC61872 245/75/17 1261 2016 FORD F350 SUPERCAB 4x4 Reg Bed 1FT8X3B66GEC61874 245/75/17 1263 2016 INTERNATIONAL H8GW Bucket Truck 1HTGSSNT4HH452718 445/50/22.5 1264 2016 INTERNATIONAL H4GW Platform Truck 1HTGSSNT6HH452719 445/50/22.5 1265 2016 INTERNATIONAL H4GW Platform Truck 1HTGSSNT6HH452720 445/50/22.5 1267 2017 FORD Ford F-350XL 2X4 1FTBF3A65HED94461 245/75/17 1268 2017 FORD Ford F-350XL 2X4 1FTBF3A65HED94459 245/75/17 1272 2017 FORD F-150 Regular Cab- 2X4 1FTMF1C89HKE39527 245/70/17 1273 2017 FORD F-150 Regular Cab- 2X4 1FTMF1C80HKE39528 245/70/17 1274 2017 FORD F-150 Regular Cab- 2X4 1FTMF1C80HKE39529 245/70/17 1278 2017 FORD T250 transit van 1FTYR3XM6HKB43066 235/65/16 1279 2017 FORD T250 transit van 1FTYR3XM6HKB43067 235/65/16 1281 2017 FORD FORD F-450 Lanscaper bed truck 1FDUF4GY5HEE20348 225/70/15 1288 2017 FORD Ford F-550 BUCKET TRUCK 1FDUF5GY4HDA10152 225/70/19.5 1289 2018 FORD Ford F-350 Pickup 1FT8X3B63JEC11389 245/75/17 1291 2018 FORD Ford F-150 Pickup Truck 1FTEX1E59JKD95362 265/70/17 1292 2018 FORD Ford F-150 Pickup Truck 1FTEX1E59JKD95359 265/70/17 1293 2018 FORD Ford F-150 Pickup Truck 1FTEX1E5XJKD95354 265/70/17 1298 2018 FORD Ford F-150 Pickup Truck 1FTEX1E55JKD95360 265/70/17 1301 2018 Ford Ford F-150 Pickup Truck 1FTEX1E55JKD95357 265/70/17 1302 2018 FORD FORD ESCAPE SE 4WD 1FMCU9GD2JUC20163 235/55/17 1303 2018 FORD TRANSIT VAN (radio van Center Street) 1FTYR2XG1JKA69244 235/65/16 1306 2018 FORD T150 TRANSIT SHORT SHORT (SUBSTATIONS) 1FTYE1YMXJKA80270 235/65/16 1311 2018 FORD Transit T-250 Radio (Radio van Powell) 1FTYR2XGXJKA69243 235/65/16 Addendum #1_BO190226LJ 3 of 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Competing in the Global Truck Industry Emerging Markets Spotlight
    KPMG INTERNATIONAL Competing in the Global Truck Industry Emerging Markets Spotlight Challenges and future winning strategies September 2011 kpmg.com ii | Competing in the Global Truck Industry – Emerging Markets Spotlight Acknowledgements We would like to express our special thanks to the Institut für Automobilwirtschaft (Institute for Automotive Research) under the lead of Prof. Dr. Willi Diez for its longstanding cooperation and valuable contribution to this study. Prof. Dr. Willi Diez Director Institut für Automobilwirtschaft (IfA) [Institute for Automotive Research] [email protected] www.ifa-info.de We would also like to thank deeply the following senior executives who participated in in-depth interviews to provide further insight: (Listed alphabetically by organization name) Shen Yang Senior Director of Strategy and Development Beiqi Foton Motor Co., Ltd. (China) Andreas Renschler Member of the Board and Head of Daimler Trucks Division Daimler AG (Germany) Ashot Aroutunyan Director of Marketing and Advertising KAMAZ OAO (Russia) Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinz Junker Chairman of the Management Board MAHLE Group (Germany) Dee Kapur President of the Truck Group Navistar International Corporation (USA) Jack Allen President of the North American Truck Group Navistar International Corporation (USA) George Kapitelli Vice President SAIC GM Wuling Automobile Co., Ltd. (SGMW) (China) Ravi Pisharody President (Commercial Vehicle Business Unit) Tata Motors Ltd. (India) © 2011 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved. Competing in the Global Truck Industry – Emerging Markets Spotlight | iii Editorial Commercial vehicle sales are spurred by far exceeded the most optimistic on by economic growth going in hand expectations – how can we foresee the with the rising demand for the transport potentials and importance of issues of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Class 2B Trucks (Vehicles of 8,500 to 10,000 Lbs GVWR)
    ORNL/TM-2002/49 Investigation of Class 2b Trucks (Vehicles of 8,500 to 10,000 lbs GVWR) March 2002 Stacy C. Davis Lorena F. Truett DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge: Web site: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD: 703-487-4639 Fax: 703-605-6900 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: 865-576-8401 Fax: 865-576-5728 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport Utility Vehicles, Mini-Vans and Light Trucks: an Overview of Fuel Economy and Emissions Standards
    Order Code RS20298 Updated June 28, 2002 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Sport Utility Vehicles, Mini-Vans and Light Trucks: An Overview of Fuel Economy and Emissions Standards Brent D. Yacobucci Environmental Policy Analyst Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary Most sport utility vehicles, mini-vans, and pickups are classified as “light trucks” and thus are regulated less stringently than passenger cars under two major laws—the Energy Policy and Conservation Act for fuel economy standards, and the Clean Air Act for emissions standards. These differences came about because at the time the laws were passed, light trucks were used differently, and because they represented a much smaller share of the automobile market. Over the past decade, however, these vehicles have dramatically increased their share of the new automobile market. Therefore, the share of total fuel consumption and emissions attributable to these vehicles has steadily increased. In response to this trend, the Environmental Protection Agency has ruled that by model year 2009, emissions from all light trucks and passenger cars will be regulated equally. However, between fiscal years 1996 and 2001, provisions in the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) annual appropriations prohibited DOT from changing fuel economy standards. The issue for Congress is whether these vehicles should continue to be treated differently from passenger cars. This report discusses the discrepancy between emissions and fuel economy standards for passenger cars and light trucks, how that discrepancy is changing, and legislative activity related to these issues. Introduction Sport utility vehicles and other light trucks are regulated through two laws that affect their fuel use and emissions: the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA)1 and the Clean Air Act (CAA).2 EPCA first set fuel economy standards for the 1977 model year (MY1977).
    [Show full text]
  • China Light Vehicle Sales Update
    December 2018 China Light Vehicle Sales Update Will the Current Boom in China’s NEV Market Stand the Test of Time? China’s Passenger Vehicle (PV) sales in November fell by 15.7% year-on-year (YoY) to 2.24 mn units, while the Light Commercial Vehicle (LCV) sector increased by 5.1% YoY. This led to an overall decline in the Light Vehicle (LV) market of 13.7% YoY, on total sales of 2.54 mn units. PV production fell by 20.1% in the month, dragging year-to-date (YTD) growth down to -3.2%. Total LV output amounted to 24.04 mn units in the year to November, a decline of 2.6% YoY. The seasonally adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) of LV sales in November was 25.3 mn units, a 3.3% drop from October, the seventh consecutive month of month-on-month (MoM) decline, and a clear indication of an extended market downturn. The CADA dealer inventory index stood at 1.92 months at the end of November, 50% up compared with the same month last year, and 2% up on October. The rate was still above the warning level of 1.5 months and much higher than the levels recorded in the month of November over the last six years. The considerable pressure exerted by such inflated inventories on OEMs will continue to impact wholesales in December 2018 and into the first quarter of 2019. The decline in the PV market in November came as little surprise, given the elevated base set in the same month of 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Automobile and Light Truck Fuel Economy: the CAFE Standards
    Order Code IB90122 Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Automobile and Light Truck Fuel Economy: The CAFE Standards Updated April 2, 2003 Robert Bamberger Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Refocusing on Fuel Economy: SUVs, OPEC, and Kyoto CAFE in Congress (1994-2000): Freezing the Standard The Freeze Is Thawed: CAFE in the 107th Congress Past Role of CAFE Standards Growth of Light-Duty Trucks and SUVs A Summary of the CAFE Debate in the 107th Congress NHTSA Rulemaking for MY2005-MY2007 Light Truck Fuel Economy Improving Fuel Economy: Other Policy Approaches The Hydrogen Initiative, FreedomCAR and the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) (1993-2003) Price of Gasoline CAFE and Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Historical Note on the CAFE Debate in the 102nd Congress LEGISLATION CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS, REPORTS, AND DOCUMENTS IB90122 04-02-03 Automobile and Light Truck Fuel Economy: The CAFE Standards SUMMARY One of the least controversial provisions appropriated funds for any rulemaking on of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of CAFE, effectively freezing the standards. 1975 (P.L. 94-163) established corporate However, facing growing concern over the average fuel economy (CAFE) standards for higher penetration of SUV sales as part of the new passenger cars. As oil prices rose, there national fleet, the Senate conferees to the was little expectation that manufacturers FY2001 appropriations insisted upon a study would have any difficulty complying with the of CAFE by the National Academy of Sci- standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford RSC 1 ROLL RATE BASED STABILITY CONTROL
    ROLL RATE BASED STABILITY CONTROL - THE ROLL STABILITY CONTROL ™ SYSTEM Jianbo Lu Dave Messih Albert Salib Ford Motor Company United States Paper Number 07-136 ABSTRACT precise detection of potential rollover conditions and driving conditions such as road bank and vehicle This paper presents the Roll Stability Control ™ loading, the aforementioned approaches need to system developed at Ford Motor Company. It is an conduct necessary trade-offs between control active safety system for passenger vehicles. It uses a sensitivity and robustness. roll rate sensor together with the information from the conventional electronic stability control hardware to In this paper, a system referred to as Roll Stability detect a vehicle's roll condition associated with a Control™ (RSC), is presented. Such a system is potential rollover and executes proper brake control designed specifically to mitigate vehicular rollovers. and engine torque reduction in response to the The idea of RSC, first documented in [10], was detected roll condition so as to mitigate a vehicular developed at Ford Motor Company and has been rollover. implemented on various vehicles within Ford Motor Company since its debut on the 2003 Volvo XC90. INTRODUCTION The RSC system adds a roll rate sensor and necessary control algorithms to an existing ESC system. The The traditional electronic stability control (ESC) roll rate sensor, together with the information from systems aim to control the yaw and sideslip angle of a the ESC system, help to effectively identify the moving vehicle through individual wheel braking and critical roll conditions which could lead to a potential engine torque reduction such that the desired path of vehicular rollover.
    [Show full text]
  • New Light Commercial Vehicles in China, 2010
    WHITE PAPER OCTOBER 2014 NEW LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN CHINA, 2010 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS AUTHORS: JUN TU, WEI ZOU, AND HUI HE www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are grateful to John German, Anup Bandivadekar and Zifei Yang for providing constructive comments. This project was sponsored by ClimateWorks Foundation. © 2014 International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 www.theicct.org | [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ii 2. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 2.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Existing literature and added values of this study............................................................... 3 2.4 Organization .......................................................................................................................................4 3. DATA DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Technical Requirements and Gaps for Lightweight and Propulsion Materials
    VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE WORKSHOP REPORT: Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Technical Requirements and Gaps for Lightweight and Propulsion Materials February 2013 FINAL REPORT This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. WORKSHOP REPORT: Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Technical Requirements and Gaps for Lightweight and Propulsion Materials EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) hosted a Lightweight and Propulsion Materials Workshop in March 2011 in Dearborn, Michigan. The Materials area of the Vehicle Technologies Office focuses on developing lightweight materials for structures and propulsion materials for more efficient powertrain systems. This meeting focused on gaining industry’s perspective on the out-year material requirements of trucks and heavy duty vehicles (HDVs) as well as current technology gaps that limit adoption of designs utilizing these lighter weight materials. The industry experts who participated in this workshop included original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) tier-one suppliers and materials suppliers to the light truck and HDV value chain.
    [Show full text]
  • California Auto Outlook
    California Auto Outlook TM Publication Sponsored By: Comprehensive information on the California vehicle market Volume 16, Number 3 Released August 2020 Covering Second Quarter 2020 Sales Low Point Likely Reached in Second Quarter; 11 Percent Increase Predicted for 2021 California Annual New Light Vehicle Registrations - 2008 thru 2021 New vehicle registrations in Cal- ifornia are expected to decline to 2.5 2.21 1.63 million units in 2020, down 2.16 2.20 2.15 2.09 ANNUAL 1.93 22 percent from last year. 1.80 1.81 2.0 1.62 1.63 TRENDS 1.45 Latest projections are for the 1.29 1.5 1.17 1.04 market to exceed 1.8 million units 1.0 in 2021, an increase of more than 10 percent from this year. 0.5 Although the trend is positive, New vehicle regs. (millions) 0.0 sales will be subject to periods '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20* '21* of ups and downs due to possible Years surges in the virus and any busi- Historical data source: AutoCount data from Experian. *‘20 and ‘21 forecasts by Auto Outlook. ness shutdowns. California Total New Light Vehicle Registrations and U.S. New Vehicle Sales - YTD 2019 & 2020, thru June California U.S. YTD '19 YTD '20 Change YTD '19 YTD '20 Change Registrations California new light vehicle mar- TWO YEAR TOTAL 1,075,658 786,219 -26.9% 8,471,317 6,480,506 -23.5% ket declined 26.9 percent during Car 457,835 294,783 -35.6% 2,523,734 1,620,012 -35.8% the first six months of this year PERSPECTIVE Light Truck 617,823 491,436 -20.5% 5,947,583 4,860,494 -18.3% versus a year earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Activity of On-Road Vehicles in MOVES201X
    Population and Activity of On-road Vehicles in MOVES201X August, 2017 Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Disclaimer This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that are currently available. The purpose of the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments which may form the basis for a final EPA decision, position, or regulatory action. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. MOVES Vehicle and Activity Classifications ........................................................................ 9 2.1. HPMS Class .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Source Use Types ........................................................................................................... 9 2.3. Regulatory Classes ........................................................................................................ 10 2.4. Fuel Types ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.5. Road Types ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Auto Outlook
    Covering Fourth Quarter 2018 Volume 19, Number 1 San Diego Auto Outlook Comprehensive information on the San Diego County new vehicle market FORECAST New Vehicle Sales Should Remain Strong in 2019 Below is a summary of eight key trends and Alternative powertrain market improves Non Luxury SUVs account for 32% of market developments in the San Diego County new County registrations of hybrid and electric cars Market share for Non Luxury SUVs increased vehicle market. and trucks increased 30% during the first 11 to 32% during the first eleven months of last months of 2018, while the overall market de- year. Small Car market share has fallen by County new retail light vehicle registrations clined the entire year. more than eight points during the past five exceeded 150,000 units in 2018 years. The new vehicle market declined slightly last Toyota, Honda, Ford, Nissan, and Chevrolet year, but sales remained at elevated levels. are leaders in county market 2018 marked the fifth consecutive year that Toyota was the best selling brand last year, Percent Change in County new registrations exceeded 145,000 units, with a 17.6% share. Honda’s county share was Light Truck and Car Registrations which is a lofty total for the county market. 12.2%, well above its 10.0% share in the U.S. 2018* vs. 2017 New vehicle sales likely to soften in 2019 Tesla, Alfa Romeo, Volvo, Land Rover, and Light Trucks (Pickups, SUVs, and Vans) There are a few signs pointing to a market Subaru posted gains slowdown. GDP growth appears to be easing New retail registrations for each of these five UP while there are increasing concerns about brands were up more than 5% from 2017 to 2.0% financial market stability and the prospects 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • California Auto Outlook
    California Auto Outlook TM Publication Sponsored By: Comprehensive information on the California vehicle market Volume 16, Number 1 Released February 2020 Covering Fourth Quarter 2019 State New Vehicle Market Predicted to Remain Strong in 2020 California Annual New Light Vehicle Registrations - 2008 thru 2020 New vehicle registrations in California are expected to slip to 2.5 1.82 million units in 2020. ANNUAL 2.05 2.09 2.05 2.00 1.85 1.89 2.0 1.71 1.82 The state’s new vehicle market is 1.53 TRENDS 1.40 predicted to decline 3.7 percent 1.5 1.22 1.04 1.11 from 2019 to 2020, a smaller 1.0 decline than the 5.5 percent drop in 2019. 0.5 New vehicle regs. (millions) Although the market is shifting 0.0 lower, new vehicle registrations '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 '20* this year should exceed the 2009 Years total by more than 780,000 units. Historical data source: IHS *2020 forecast by Auto Outlook. California and U.S. Total New Light Vehicle Registrations - YTD thru September California U.S. 2018 2019 Change 2018 2019 Change Registrations California new light vehicle TWO YEAR TOTAL 2,002,047 1,892,672 -5.5% 17,115,072 16,931,012 -1.1% market declined 5.5 percent PERSPECTIVE Car 896,525 787,397 -12.2% 5,337,244 4,760,967 -10.8% from 2018 to 2019, while the Light Truck 1,105,522 1,105,275 0.0% 11,777,828 12,170,045 3.3% U.S.
    [Show full text]