DOCSLIB.ORG

Tropical Marine Invertebrates CAS BI 569 Phylum Chordata by J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tropical Marine Invertebrates CAS BI 569 Phylum Chordata by J Tropical Marine Invertebrates CAS BI 569 Phylum Chordata by J. R. Finnerty Porifera Ctenophora Cnidaria Deuterostomia Ecdysozoa Lophotrochozoa Chordata Arthropoda Annelida Hemichordata Onychophora Mollusca Echinodermata *Nematoda *Platyhelminthes Acoelomorpha Calcispongia Silicispongiae PROTOSTOMIA Phylum Chordata subPhylum VERTEBRATA subPhylum UROCHORDATA class Ascidaceae—the “sea squirts” class Larvaceae—the larvaceans class Thaliaceae—the salps subPhylum CEPHALOCHORDATA—the “lancelets” Subphylum Subphylum Subphylum Phylum Phylum Vertebrata Urochordata Cephalochordata ECHINODERMATA HEMICHORDATA Phylum CHORDATA Notochord Blastopore -> anus Dorsal hollow nerve cord Radial / equal cleavage Pharyngeal gill slits Coelom forms by enterocoely Endostyle Cross-section through a Chick embryo During Neurulation Subphylum Vertebrata Ordovician Origins—Jawless fishes vertebral column paired appendages post-anal tail Jawed fishes, gnathostomes late Ordovician, early Silurian jaws early Devonian / late Devonian tetrapods / amniotes Permian (299-251) Carboniferous subphylum VERTEBRATA (359-299) gnathostomes (with jaws) 1. Vertebral column Devonian 2. Paired appendages (416-359) 3. Jaws 4. Post anal tail Silurian (444-416) Bony fishes Cartilaginous fishes Paleozoic (543-225) Fishes with jaws & paired fins Ray-finned & Lobe-finned fishes Ordivician Jawless fishes (488-444) Vertebrate origins Jawless fishes phylum CHORDATA Cambrian 1. Dorsal nerve cord (542-488) Non-vert chordates “Cambrian explosion” 2. Notochord Rapid appearance of most 3. Gill slits Animal phyla in fossil record Including Phylum Chordata 4. Endostyle Permian (299-251) 4 3 2 1 1.Pre-mammal-like reptiles 2. Snake-lizard ancestor 3.Crocodile-Bird-Dino ancestor 4. Turtles Carboniferous (359-299) amphibians Early reptiles. Devonian (416-359) Vertebrates invade land “Age of amphibians” Silurian (444-416) Bony fishes AMNIOTES Cartilaginous fishes Paleozoic (543-225) Fishes with jaws & paired fins 1. Terrestrial Ray-finned & Lobe-finned fishes 2. Amniotic sac in egg. Ordivician Jawless fishes (488-444) Vertebrate origins Jawless fishes Cambrian (542-488) Non-vert chordates “Cambrian explosion” Rapid appearance of most Animal phyla in fossil record Including Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Archetypal vertebrate (lamprey-like) Subphylum Vertebrata Tetrapod Subphylum Cephalochordata 30 described species known as “lancelets” Blade-shaped (laterally-compressed, tapered at both ends) 4-8 cm long Looks like a skinless, headless, boneless fish Rapid undulatory swimmers Burrow in porous sediments Reach high densities in favorable environments (5000/m2) Harvested for food in southeast Asia. Thirty-five tons (=1 billion individuals) were once harvested from an area of 6 square miles in a single year. Subphylum Cephalochordata Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Subphylum Urochordata Most diverged from the basic chordate body plan. Except for one group (the larvaceans), the adults lack a notochord, a dorsal hollow nerve cord, and a post anal tail. The larva, called a tadpole, possesses all of the diagnostic chordate features. Coelom is lacking. The gut is U-shaped. Many colonial species—the only colonial chordates. Class Ascidacea—the ascidians—are sessile filter feeders. Class Thaliacea—the salps—are planktonic filter feeders. Class Larvacea—the larvaceans—are planktonic filter feeders. Urochordates make use of mucous nets in feeding. Subphylum Urochordata Class Ascidiacea (ascidians or tunicates) incurrent siphon excurrent siphon pharynx Source: Biology 7e by Raven et al. Subphylum Urochordata Class Ascidiacea (ascidians or tunicates) Source: Ruppert et al. Invertebrate Zoology Subphylum Urochordata Class Ascidiacea (ascidians or tunicates) Source: Biology 7e by Raven et al. Subphylum Urochordata Class Ascidiacea (ascidians or tunicates) Ruppert et al., Invertebrate Zoology, figure 29-25 Salp Anatomy Subphylum Urochordata Class Thaliacea (“salps”) Ruppert et al., Invertebrate Zoology, figure 29-28 Salp Feeding "We had long thought that salps were about the most efficient filter feeders in the ocean,” said Laurence P. Madin, WHOI Director of Research and one of the investigators. “But these results extend their impact down to the smallest available size fraction, showing they consume particles spanning four orders of magnitude in size. This is like eating everything from a mouse to a horse." Salps capture food particles, mostly phytoplankton, with an internal mucous filter net. Until now, it was thought that their menu was limited to particles only as large as or larger than the 1.5-micron-wide holes in the mesh. But a mathematical model suggested salps somehow might be capturing food particles smaller than that, said Kelly R. Sutherland, who wrote the paper as part of her PhD thesis at the MIT/WHOI Joint Program for graduate students. In the laboratory at WHOI, Sutherland and her colleagues offered salps food particles of three sizes: smaller, around the same size as, and larger than the mesh openings. http://www.whoi.edu Salp Feeding “We found that more small particles were captured than expected,” said Sutherland, now a postdoctoral researcher at Caltech. “When exposed to ocean-like particle concentrations, 80 percent of the particles that were captured were the smallest particles offered in the experiment." .....it helps explain how salp--which can exist either singly or in “chains” that may contain a hundred or more--are able to survive in the open ocean, their usual habitat, where the supply of larger food particles is low. Madin, who served as Sutherland’s advisor at WHOI, adds: “Their ability to filter the smallest particles may allow them to survive where other grazers can't.” http://www.whoi.edu Salps & Carbon Cycling? “Free-floating sediment traps were suspended at 200 and 900 m in the northern North Pacific Ocean during 20-21 May, 1974. A considerable amount of large, dark-green particles, larger than 1 mm in diameter, was collected at both depths. These large particles corresponded morphologically with fecal pellets of salps. Vertical carbon flux was estimated to be 10.5 and 6.7 mg C m-2 d-1 at 200 and 900 m, respectively. This suggests that vertical transport of salp fecal pellets could play an important role in meeting the energy requirements of bathypelagic organisms in the open ocean.” K. Iseki (1981) Particulate organic matter transport to the deep sea by salp fecal pellets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 5:55-60. Quoted at: http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com Salps & Carbon Cycling? ....it enhances the importance of the salps’ role in carbon cycling. As they eat small, as well as large, particles, “they consume the entire 'microbial loop' and pack it into large, dense fecal pellets,” Madin says. The larger and denser the carbon-containing pellets, the sooner they sink to the ocean bottom. “This removes carbon from the surface waters,” says Sutherland, “and brings it to a depth where you won’t see it again for years to centuries.” And the more carbon that sinks to the bottom, the more space there is for the upper ocean to accommodate carbon, hence limiting the amount that rises into the atmosphere as CO2, explains co-author Roman Stocker of MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering . http://www.whoi.edu Subphylum Urochordata Class Larvacea (“larvaceans”) PHOTO BY: Russ Hopcroft, Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Ascidian vs. Larvacean development Ruppert et al., Invertebrate Zoology, figure 29-34 Hemichordata: Enteropneusta Hemichordata: Enteropneusta cleavage Radial Radial Radial Radial Radial mouth form. deut deut deut deut deut coelom form. entero- entero entero entero entero pharyngeal no yes yes yes yes slits (sometimes) D nerve cord no yes yes yes yes (sometimes) echinoderms hemichordates cephalochordates urochordates vertebrates ? Dorsal hollow nerve cord Notochord Pharyngeal gill slits Deuterostomy Endostyle Radial cleavage Enterocoely.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendicularia of CTAW
    APPENDICULARIA APPENDICULARIA a b Fig. 26. Oikopleura albicans (Leuckart, 1854), a commonly occurring appendicularian species: a, dorsal view; b, lateral view. (Scale bar = 0.1 mm). [after T. Prentiss, reproduced with permission, from Alldredge 1976] Appendicularians are small free swimming planktonic tunicates, their bodies consisting of a short trunk and a tail (containing the notochord cells) which is present through the life of the individual. Glandular (oikoplast) epithelium on the trunk secretes the mucous house which encloses the whole or part of the body and contains the complex filters which strain food from the water driven through them (Deibel 1998; Flood & Deibel 1998). Unlike other tunicates, there is no peribranchial cavity and a pair of pharyngeal perforations (spiracles) surrounded by a ring of cilia open directly to the exterior from the floor of the pharynx. The early studies of these organisms, begun with Chamisso's description of Appendicularia flagellum Chamisso, 1821, were confounded by questions of its phylogenetic affinity. Chamisso classified his species with medusoids, Mertens (1830) with molluscs, and Quoy & Gaimard (1833) with zoophytes. Only in 1851 were appendicularians correctly assigned to the Tunicata by Huxley. At the time of this placement, the existence of more than one taxon was only just beginning to be recognised, and despite Huxley's work, they were not universally regarded as adult organisms—some authors still insisting that they were ascidian larvae or a free swimming generation of the sessile ascidians (Fenaux 1993). Subsequently, these questions were resolved by the work of Fol (1872) on material from the Straits of Messina, which forms the basis of later studies on the large collections of the great expeditions of the 19th century that revealed their true diversity in the oceanic plankton.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurochordata and Cephalochordata of Persian Gulf & Oman See
    Subphylum Urochordata : Tunicates Class Ascidacea Class Larvacea Class Thaliacea Subphylum Cephalochordata : Amphioxus Phylum Chordata : 1 - Subphylum Urochordata 2 Subphylum Cephalochordata (Subphylum Urochordata : Tunicates ) Class Ascidiacea Class Larvacea Class Thaliacea (Subphylum Cephalochordata ) Class Ascidiacea Ascidia Kowalevsky Patricia Kott D. lane David George & Gordon Paterson Herdmania momus savigny Herdmania momus kiamanensis Didemnum candidum savigny Phallusia nigra savigny Styela canopus savigny Class Ascidiacea : Order : Aplousobranchia Family : Polyclinidae : Aplidium cf. rubripunctum C.Monniot & F. Monniot 1997 Polyclinum constellatum Savigny, 1816 Family Didemnidae Didemnum candidum Savigny, 1816 Didemnum cf. granulatum Tokioka, 1954 Didemnum obscurum F. Monniot 1969 Didemnum perlucidum F. Monniot, 1983 Didemnum sp. Didemnum yolky C.Monniot & F. Monniot 1997 Diplosoma listerianum Milne Edwards, 1841 Order : Phlebobranchia Family : Ascidiidae Ascidia sp. Phallusia julinea Sluiter, 1915 Phallusia nigra Savigny, 1816 Order : Stolidobranchia Family : Styelidae Botryllus gregalis Sluiter, 1898 Botryllus niger Herdman, 1886 Botryllus sp. Eusynstyela cf. hartmeyeri Michaelsen, 1904 Polyandrocarpa sp. Styela canopus Savigny, 1816 Symplegma bahraini C.Monniot & F. Monniot 1997 Symplegma brakenhielmi Michaelsen, 1904 Family pyuridae Herdmania momus Savigny, 1816 Pyura curvigona Tokioka, 1950 Pyurid sp. Class Larvacea Larva Seymour Sewell Phylum Chordata Subphylum Urochordata * Class Larvacea Order Copelata Family Fritillariidae
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom
    lopmen ve ta e l B Williamson, Cell Dev Biol 2012, 1:1 D io & l l o l g DOI: 10.4172/2168-9296.1000101 e y C Cell & Developmental Biology ISSN: 2168-9296 Research Article Open Access The Origins of Chordate Larvae Donald I Williamson* Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, United Kingdom Abstract The larval transfer hypothesis states that larvae originated as adults in other taxa and their genomes were transferred by hybridization. It contests the view that larvae and corresponding adults evolved from common ancestors. The present paper reviews the life histories of chordates, and it interprets them in terms of the larval transfer hypothesis. It is the first paper to apply the hypothesis to craniates. I claim that the larvae of tunicates were acquired from adult larvaceans, the larvae of lampreys from adult cephalochordates, the larvae of lungfishes from adult craniate tadpoles, and the larvae of ray-finned fishes from other ray-finned fishes in different families. The occurrence of larvae in some fishes and their absence in others is correlated with reproductive behavior. Adult amphibians evolved from adult fishes, but larval amphibians did not evolve from either adult or larval fishes. I submit that [1] early amphibians had no larvae and that several families of urodeles and one subfamily of anurans have retained direct development, [2] the tadpole larvae of anurans and urodeles were acquired separately from different Mesozoic adult tadpoles, and [3] the post-tadpole larvae of salamanders were acquired from adults of other urodeles. Reptiles, birds and mammals probably evolved from amphibians that never acquired larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing a Species As a Threatened Or Endangered Species Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Listing a Species as a Threatened or Endangered Species Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, is one of the most far- reaching wildlife conservation laws ever enacted by any nation. Congress, on behalf of the American people, passed the ESA to prevent extinctions facing many species of fish, wildlife and plants. The purpose of the ESA is to conserve endangered and threatened species and the ecosystems on which they depend as key components of America’s heritage. To implement the ESA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service works in cooperation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), other Federal, State, and local USFWS Susanne Miller, agencies, Tribes, non-governmental Listed in 2008 as threatened because of the decline in sea ice habitat, the polar bear may organizations, and private citizens. spend time on land during fall months, waiting for ice to return. Before a plant or animal species can receive the protection provided by What are the criteria for deciding whether refer to these species as “candidates” the ESA, it must first be added to to add a species to the list? for listing. Through notices of review, the Federal lists of threatened and A species is added to the list when it we seek biological information that will endangered wildlife and plants. The is determined to be an endangered or help us to complete the status reviews List of Endangered and Threatened threatened species because of any of for these candidate species. We publish Wildlife (50 CFR 17.11) and the List the following factors: notices in the Federal Register, a daily of Endangered and Threatened Plants n the present or threatened Federal Government publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity 3: Six Kingdoms Brochure
    Activity 3: Six Kingdoms Brochure Objective: You will demonstrate your knowledge of the six kingdoms of organisms by gathering information (from your class notes, the internet, and the biology textook) and creating a brochure on the six kingdoms in which scientists classify organisms. Your brochure will be organized as follows: 1. Making the Brochure- the brochure is made of one piece of paper. Fold the paper into thirds. 2. Cover- your cover should have a picture and an appropriate title. Your name should be written in the bottom right corner of the cover. 3. Inside the Brochure- inside your brochure, you should have one section for each of six kingdoms. Use the front and back of the paper. Since there will only be five open sections left in the brochure, you should place both the Eubacteria Kingdom and Archaebacteria Kingdom in the same section. You must include the following information for each of the six kingdoms: • Are the organisms unicellular (one cell) or multicellular (many cells) or both? • Do they have a nucleus in their cells? • Do they make their own food or get it from other organisms? • Other important characteristics • A picture or a diagram of sample organisms (one or a few) The Kingdom Fungi The Kingdom Fungi includes some of the most important organisms, both in terms of their ecological and economic roles. By decomposing dead material, they continue the cycle of nutrients through ecosystems. In addition, most plants could not grow without the fungi, or mycorrhizae, that live in their roots and supply essential nutrients. Other fungi provide numerous drugs (such as penicillin and other antibiotics), foods like mushrooms, truffles and morels, and the bubbles in bread (yeast), champagne, and beer.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Guidance on Awards of Grants to Indian Tribes Under Section 106 of the Clean Water Act
    Final Guidance on Awards of Grants to Indian Tribes under Section 106 of the Clean Water Act For Fiscal Years 2007 and Beyond United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Office of Wastewater Management EPA 832-R-06-003 i This page intentionally left blank ii Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose of this Guidance ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 106 Tribal Program Background .................................................................................................................................... 1-2 Need for this Guidance .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-2 GPRA, PART, and Environmental Results .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 EPA’s Strategic Plan ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Oct. 2014, Vol. 66:02
    The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Oct. 2014, vol. 66:02 MycoDigest: October 21 General Meeting Speaker William Bridge Cooke: an avid collector and much more Else Vellinga Chances are that you have never heard of William Bridge Cooke – an Ohio-born mycologist who lived from 1908 till 1991. Yet he played a big role in the history of California mycology. I came across his name over and over again while working on the digitization of the herbarium collections at UC Berkeley. He contributed over 2100 mushroom collections to the herbarium, more than any other collector. Cooke spent the summers of 1936–1941 and again 1946–1947 as custodian of the Shasta Alpine Lodge at the Horse Camp halfway along the route to the peak of Mount Shasta. That meant providing hikers with food, warmth and a shelter, but also ample time to investigate the plants, mushrooms, and other Katrina Blair fungi of the area. And that he did. He made a set of collections of Mount Shasta fungi, “Foraging on the Wild Side: which he offered to the University of California, Berkeley. Even more im- Edible Plants, Mushrooms, and Medicine portantly, Cooke discovered that in spring and early summer, certain mush- rooms fruited beside the melting snow, coining the term “snowbank fungi” to Katrina Blair began studying wild plants describe this phenomenon. Melting snow provides the fungi with the dearly in her teens when she camped out alone for a summer with the intention of eating primarily wild foods. She later wrote “The Wild Edible and Medicinal Plants of the San Juan Mountains” for her senior project at Colorado College.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Embryologist Gavin Rylands De Beer (1899–1972)
    Homology and Heterochrony: The Evolutionary Embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer (1899–1972) Ingo Brigandt Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 1017 Cathedral of Learning Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA E-mail: [email protected] Preprint of an article published in 2006 in the Journal of Experimental Zoology (Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 306B: 317–328 www.interscience.Wiley.com GAVIN RYLANDS DE BEER (1899–1972) 2 Abstract The evolutionary embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer can be viewed as one of the forerunners of modern evolutionary developmental biology in that he posed crucial questions and proposed relevant answers about the causal relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. In his developmental approach to the phylogenetic phenomenon of homology, he emphasized that homology of morphological structures is to be identified neither with the sameness of the underlying developmental processes nor with the homology of the genes that are in involved in the development of the structures. De Beer’s work on developmental evolution focused on the notion of heterochrony, arguing that paedomorphosis increases morphological evolvability and is thereby an important mode of evolution that accounts for the origin of many taxa, including higher taxa. GAVIN RYLANDS DE BEER (1899–1972) 3 Gavin Rylands de Beer (Fig. 1) was born in England in 1899, but spent the first 13 years of his life in France, where his father worked as a correspondent of a telegraph company. After returning to England, he went to Harrow School, where he became interested in zoology. In 1917 he entered Magdalen College at Oxford, graduating in 1922 after a leave for serving in the British Army during World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 8 2007 A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Prince, Linda M. (2007) "A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol24/iss1/8 Aliso 24, pp. 105–121 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A BRIEF NOMENCLATURAL REVIEW OF GENERA AND TRIBES IN THEACEAE LINDA M. PRINCE Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Ave., Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The angiosperm family Theaceae has been investigated extensively with a rich publication record of anatomical, cytological, paleontological, and palynological data analyses and interpretation. Recent developmental and molecular data sets and the application of cladistic analytical methods support dramatic changes in circumscription at the familial, tribal, and generic levels. Growing interest in the family outside the taxonomic and systematic fields warrants a brief review of the recent nomenclatural history (mainly 20th century), some of the classification systems currently in use, and an explanation of which data support various classification schemes. An abridged bibliography with critical nomen- clatural references is provided. Key words: anatomy, classification, morphology, nomenclature, systematics, Theaceae. INTRODUCTION acters that were restricted to the family and could be used to circumscribe it.
    [Show full text]
  • BLY 202 (Basic Chordates Zoology) Sub-Phylum Urochordata (Tunicata)
    BLY 202 (Basic Chordates Zoology) Sub-Phylum Urochordata (Tunicata) Objectives are to; a) understand the characteristics of Urochordata b) have knowledge on Urochordata evolution c) understand the different classes and their physiology The urochordates (“tail-chordates”), more commonly called tunicates, include about 3000 species. Tunicates are also called sea squirts. They are found in all seas from near shoreline to great depths. Most are sessile as adults, although some are free living. The name “tunicate” is suggested by the usually tough, non-living tunic, or test that surrounds the animal and contains cellulose. As adults, tunicates are highly specialized chordates, for in most species only the larval form, which resembles a microscopic tadpole, bears all the chordate hallmarks. During adult metamorphosis, the notochord (which, in the larva, is restricted to the tail, hence the group name Urochordata) and the tail disappear altogether, while the dorsal nerve cord becomes reduced to a single ganglion. The body of the adult urochordates is unsegmented and lacks a tail. Nephrocytes are responsible for the excretion of urochordates. The asexual reproduction of urochordates occurs by budding. Urochordates are bisexual and the external fertilization is the mode of sexual reproduction. Urochordates have an unsegmented body. Urochordates are exclusively marine animal. The earliest probable species of tunicate appears in the fossil record in the early Cambrian period. Despite their simple appearance and very different adult form, their close relationship to the vertebrates is evidenced by the fact that during their mobile larval stage, they possess a notochord or stiffening rod and resemble a tadpole. Their name derives from their unique outer covering or "tunic", which is formed from proteins and carbohydrates, and acts as an exoskeleton.
    [Show full text]
  • Oikopleura Dioica
    To: [email protected] o ABSTRACT We propose that a BAC library should be constructed for the larvacean urochordate Oikopleura dioica. This animal may be the most similar among extant animals to the last common ancestor of all chordates, and thus, its investigation can illuminate the mechanisms causing the vertebrate genome expansion, the principles that guide the evolution of functions of duplicate genes in development, and the origin of vertebrate developmental innovations. Oikopleura dioica has a genome of about 70 Mb, the smallest of any chordate. o IMPORTANCE OF THE ORGANISM TO BIOMEDICAL OR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH. The Animal. Oikopleura dioica is a 3 mm long urochordate, an abundant filter-feeder in marine plankton. Oikopleura and other members of its phylogenetic class, the larvaceans (or appendicularians) remain free swimming and tadpole-like into sexual maturity. Because larvaceans are basally diverging among the urochordates, this free-swimming life style may have been ancestral (Wada 1998). Larvaceans have more functional organ systems than do ascidian larvae; their embryos, tadpole larvae, and adults are transparent, which facilitates observations on all aspects of development (Fig. 1); embryonic development takes only 14 hours; and the generation time is less than two weeks. Furthermore, Oikopleura dioica is readily available from plankton tows for much of the year off Northern hemisphere coasts. Oikopleura dioica can be among the most abundant animals in offshore waters, even more than copepods, amounting to several animals per liter (Dagg & Ortner 1994; Capitano & Esnal 1998). With Oikopleura, one can perform single-pair matings, and culture the offspring in the lab continuously in the presence of fresh sea water (Fenaux & Gorsky, 1983; Bassham, unpubl).
    [Show full text]