DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union Ref. Ares(2016)140624 - 11/01/2016 Proportionality Between Ownership and Control in EU Listed Companies External Study Commissioned by the European Commission Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgments 3 Executive Summary 5 Chapter One: Objectives and Scope of the Study 7 1.1 Objectives of the Study 7 1.2 List of Control Enhancing Mechanisms 7 1.2.1 CEMs analysed in the Study 7 1.2.2 Deviations not analysed in the Study 9 Chapter Two: The Theory and The Empirical Evidence 10 2.1 The Theory 10 2.2 The Empirical Evidence 12 Chapter Three: The Regulatory Framework 14 3.1 General Presentation 14 3.2 Regulatory Framework by CEM 18 3.2.1 Multiple voting right shares 18 3.2.2 Non-voting shares 19 3.2.3 Non-voting preference shares 19 3.2.4 Pyramid structures 19 3.2.5 Priority shares 20 3.2.6 Depository certificates 20 3.2.7 Voting right ceilings 20 3.2.8 Ownership ceilings 20 3.2.9 Supermajority provisions 21 3.2.10 Golden shares 21 3.2.11 Partnerships limited by shares 22 3.2.12 Cross-shareholdings 22 3.2.13 Shareholders agreements 22 Chapter Four: Control Enhancing Mechanisms in Company practice 23 4.1 Sample of Companies Analysed 23 4.2 Overall Results 24 4.3 Control Enhancing Mechanisms by Type 26 4.3.1 Multiple voting rights shares 26 4.3.2 Non-voting shares (without preference) 28 4.3.3 Non-voting preference shares 28 4.3.4 Pyramid structures 28 4.3.5 Depository certificates 30 4.3.6 Voting right ceilings 30 4.3.7 Ownership ceilings 32 4.3.8 Golden shares 32 4.3.9 Cross-shareholdings 34 4.3.10 Shareholders agreements 35 1 Table of Contents 4.4 Control Enhancing Mechanisms by Member State 36 4.4.1 Belgium 36 4.4.2 Denmark 39 4.4.3 Estonia 40 4.4.4 Finland 41 4.4.5 France 43 4.4.6 Germany 47 4.4.7 Greece 49 4.4.8 Hungary 53 4.4.9 Ireland 56 4.4.10 Italy 58 4.4.11 Luxembourg 63 4.4.12 The Netherlands 64 4.4.13 Poland 68 4.4.14 Spain 71 4.4.15 Sweden 74 4.4.16 The United Kingdom 77 4.5 Control Enhancing Mechanisms outside the EU 81 5 Chapter Five: Impact of Control Enhancing Mechanisms on Investors 82 5.1 Introduction 82 5.2 The Survey 82 5.2.1 Respondents’ profile 82 5.2.2 Investors’ perception of Control Enhancing Mechanisms 84 5.2.3 Investment decisions 85 5.2.4 Control Enhancing Mechanisms and Discounts 88 5.3 Comments to the Survey 89 5.3.1 Perception of CEMs by investors 89 5.3.2 Do CEMs affect investment decisions 89 5.3.3 Why investors invest in companies with CEMs 91 5.3.4 Why investors do no invest in companies with CEMs 92 5.3.5 Discounts 92 5.3.6 Refining the perspective 93 5.3.7 Measures to be taken 94 5.3.8 Conclusion 96 6 Annexes 97 Annex 1 Methodology: Profiling of issuers 97 Sample of companies analysed 97 Process of analysis 98 Profiling tool 98 Annex 2 List of Abbreviations 102 Annex 3 Investor Survey 103 Annex 4 Existence of Control Enhancing Mechanisms in European companies 117 Annex 5 Academic Papers 141 Annex 6 Full Legal Review 142 Annex 7 Table of Figures 143 External Study Commissioned by the European Commission Open call for Tenders N° MARKT/2006/15/F Proportionality between Ownership and Control in EU Listed Companies: 2 Acknowledgments Acknowledgments This Study, undertaken by Institutional Shareholder Services in collaboration with Sherman & Sterling LLP and the European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI), is the result of a team effort involving offices across Europe and individuals from many different backgrounds and opinions in many different EU member states. The team has striven to produce a study that provides the “full, systematic picture of the essential features of Corporate Europe that the European public opinion is waiting for” as Commissioner McCreevy called for when inviting us to undertake this project. The Project Coordinators would like to express their gratitude to all contributors. First we would like to thank the members of the European Commission who commissioned this survey. We thank Commissioner McCreevy, as well as Head of Unit Pierre Delsaux and Deputy Head of Unit Philippe Pellé, for giving us the opportunity to research this fascinating subject. We also thank Mr. Paolo Santella and Ms. Corinna Ullrich for their comments, their encouragements, and for the close working relationship built over these past months. We are grateful to the members of the European Parliament for the interest they displayed regarding this study throughout its drafting and for the pertinent questions they raised to ensure its independence. The authors of the Study benefited from the wealth of intellectual resources in the field of corporate governance present at the Corporate Governance Forum, represented by Mr. Peter Montagnon, Mr. Jaap Winter and Mr. Eddy Wymeersch. We are indebted to them for their time and insightful discussions. Our thanks also go to Luca Enriques for his valuable comments and his effective coordination of the legal scholar network as well as to Professors Colin Mayer, Julian Franks and Joe McCahery, our scientific committee, for overseeing the drafting teams and networks. Their dedication to the ECGI was exemplary. A special word of thanks is owed to Leo Goldschmidt, independent board member of the ECGI. He provided wise counsel throughout the nine-month project, starting from the definition of the project and setting up of a methodology, all the way to the final report, including precious comments on the many drafts during the editing and proofreading of the manuscript. His writing skills as well as his thorough understanding of the Study’s subject matter were invaluable to the project’s completion. We are deeply indebted to Professor Renée Adams, Professor Mike Burkart, Dr Daniel Ferreira and Samuel Lee, four financial economists, members of the ECGI network, for the great added value of their review of existing research and literature. We would also like to thank the ECGI’s correspondent network for providing the survey authors with useful assistance and comments, when called upon.1 We are very grateful to Shearman & Sterling’s Hervé Letréguilly (France), Hans Diekmann (Germany), Domenico Fanuele (Italy), Kenneth Lebrun (Japan), Peter King (United Kingdom) and George Casey (United States), as well as Freehills (Australia), Eubelius (Belgium), ACCURA (Denmark), Raidla & Partners (Estonia), Roschier (Finland), Karatzas and Partners (Greece), Gárdos, Füredi, Mosonyi, Tomori (Hungary), McCann FitzGerald (Ireland), Mori Hamada & Matsumoto (Japan), Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen (Luxembourg), Houthoff Buruma (the Netherlands), Soltysi`´ nski, Kawecki & Szlçzak (Poland), Despacho Albiñana & Suárez de Lezo (Spain) and Vinge (Sweden), all highly qualified law firms, for contributing their legal review for all jurisdictions. We are specifically indebted to Professor Hervé Synvet, a leading professor in French corporate and finance law, for his most valuable comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Shearman & Sterling’s Michael Buckworth, Matthias Decker, Federico Mucciarelli, Nora Pines, Brian Wheeler and Fang Xue for their precious help throughout the project. We also thank Professor Jennifer Hill (Australia), Professor Christoph Van der Elst (Belgium), Professor Mette Neville (Denmark), Professor Andres Vutt (Estonia), Professor Pierre-Henri Conac (France), Professor Matti Sillanpää (Finland), Professor Peter Mulbert (Germany), Professor Nicholas Georgakopoulos (Greece), Professor András Kisfaludi (Hungary), Professor Irene Lynch-Fannon (Ireland), Professor Ettore Scimemi (Italy), Dr Harald Baum (Japan), Professor Isabelle Corbisier (Luxembourg), Professor Erik Vermeulen (the Netherlands), Professor Arkadiusz Radwan (Poland), Professor Candido Paz-Ares (Spain), Professor Erik Nerep (Sweden), Professor Niamh Moloney (United Kingdom), Dr Allen Ferrell (United States), all highly experienced legal scholars from the ECGI network, for their careful review of the legal study. Likewise we wish to record our appreciation for the role played by the Advisory Committee of ISS: Randal Hancock, Stanley Dubiel, Geof Stapledon, Paul Frentrop and Stephen Dean, who in their capacity as senior external advisors and regional corporate governance experts, kindly reviewed and commented on various portions of the Study. 1 A full list of the network members can be found at http://www.ecgi.org/osov/correspondent_network.php 3 Acknowledgments Our gratitude also goes to project managers Christel Dumas, Kristian Pedersen and Cristina Vespro for coordinating all aspects of the research. They led the project teams, coordinated them across borders, liaised between the partners and were instrumen- tal in drafting and producing the Final Report. They were assisted by Anna Brunialti whom we thank for tirelessly making and sending copies of company profiles to issuers. They also received the precious help of Alexis Hul who gave technical assistance and answered the many questions of investors wishing to participate in the survey. Finally we would especially like to thank the many country analysts from ISS who helped with the collection of data and its treatment: Gabriel Alsina, Eva Chauvet, James Clarke, Roland Escher, Torsten Frey, Kristof Ho Tiu, Daniel Jarman, Kenneth Kabuye, Jan Kluck, Etelvina Martinez, Aneta McCoy, Tosin Osoko, Juan Pajuelo, Catherine Salmon, Brendan Sargent, Antigoni Skylakou, Maria Vologni, Natalie Defilette and Sergio Schuchner. They contributed their time, diligence and expertise to the Study, notwithstanding many other current projects and commitments. The Project Coordinators Jean-Nicolas Caprasse Christophe Clerc Marco Becht Managing Director, Europe and UK European Counsel Executive Director Institutional Shareholder Services Europe Shearman & Sterling ECGI 4 Executive Summary Executive Summary Scope of the Study The structure of share ownership may have an important impact on a company’s behaviour and performance, and also on investors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invitation to Subscribe for Shares in Wayfinder Systems AB (Publ) Wayfinder Omslag E 13Sep.Qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida II
    Wayfinder_omslag_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida I Invitation to subscribe for shares in Wayfinder Systems AB (publ) Wayfinder_omslag_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida II Wayfinder Navigator™ turns your mobile phone into a complete navigation system. Install the software, connect to the GPS and you are ready to navigate throughout Europe and North America. Wayfinder Navigator is a network-based tool that gives you the opportunity to see maps, routes and points-of-interest wherever you are. Turn left in hundred metres Wayfinder_1-60_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.29 Sida 1 Contents Invitation to subscribe for shares in Wayfinder Systems ....................................................................................................... 3 Conditions and Offer particulars ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Background and reasons.................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Comments by the CEO.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wayfinder Systems in brief .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Edge
    CLICK HERE YOURTO IP HREADONE /ONIPAD BUSINESS ANALYSIS FOR TELECOMS PROFESSIONALS APRIL 2011 LEADER CONTENTS NEWS IN BRIEF COMPETITIVE EDGE 5 Timeline A roundup of some of the Competition is back in the spotlight as operators try to tackle major stories reported in our daily news service mobile and Internet service growth and look to build scale www.totaltele.com CONTENT STRATEGIES any telecoms markets and the telecoms landscape is chang- have opened up to much ing fast. As regulators mandate 8 Location-based Mgreater competition since greater access to (former) incum- services BT became the first national opera- bent networks—BT faces further Operators are looking for tor to go down the path to reductions in wholesale pricing after new business models to privatisation some 26 years ago. new proposals from Ofcom—fresh make revenues from Today many mobile markets players are springing up to deliver location-based services. continue on that path, with new new services and in some cases Ian Kemp BUSINESS AND FINANCE Editor licence awards a regular occurence bypass those networks altogether. 11 Competition in Total Telecom+ and virtual network operators Where once operators hoped to take receiving clearance from regulators a lead in location-based services, mobile markets to provide targeted services that now they are playing catch-up with A new report shows that give consumers greater choice than Internet and handset heavyweights regulation has had mixed results in terms of ever. Regulators are also going to and still trying to use their network boosting competition in work on tariffs, with the UK and assets to make revenues (p.8).
    [Show full text]
  • Business Segments Ranging from Small- Proportionate Mobile Customers Across the World
    Proportionate mobile customers across the globe. 341.1m (2009: 302.6m; 2008: 260.5m) BrandFinance global ranking 7th most valuable brand (2009: 8th; 2008: 11th) Customers and distribution Customers are at the core of everything we do. Through our products and services we endeavour to address all our customers’ communications needs. International customer base with diverse needs Enterprise Vodafone has a truly international customer base with 341.1 million Vodafone also caters to all business segments ranging from small- proportionate mobile customers across the world. We continually office-home-office (‘SoHo’) and small-medium enterprises (‘SMEs’) to seek to develop new and innovative propositions that deliver relevance corporates and multinational corporations (‘MNCs’). While our core and value to all our customers and build a long lasting relationship mobile voice and data business continues to grow, our enterprise meeting their expectations and needs. As customers move between customers are increasingly asking for combined fixed and mobile work and home environments and look for integrated solutions, solutions for their voice and data needs as well as integrated services we have a suite of propositions which often bundle together and productivity tools. voice, messaging, data and increasingly fixed line services to meet their needs. Brand We have continued to build brand value by delivering a superior, consistent and differentiated customer experience. During the 2010 financial year we evolved our brand positioning to “power to you” emphasising our role of empowering customers to be able to live their lives to the full. It is a further expression of the importance of the customer being central to everything we do and is reinforced in communications substantiating how products and services impact and empower our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodafone Group Plc Plc Vodafone Group
    Vodafone Group Plc Group Vodafone Plc Registered Office Vodafone Group Plc Vodafone House The Connection Annual Report Newbury Berkshire For the year ended 31 March 2010 RG14 2FN England Registered in England No. 1833679 Tel: +44 (0) 1635 33251 2010 March 31 ended year the Report for Annual Fax: +44 (0) 1635 45713 www.vodafone.com We are one of the world’s largest Contact details mobile communications companies Investor Relations by revenue, operating across the Telephone: +44 (0) 1635 33251 globe providing a wide range of Media Relations communications services. Our vision Telephone: +44 (0) 1635 664444 is to be the communications leader Corporate Responsibility in an increasingly connected world. Fax: +44 (0) 1635 674478 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.vodafone.com/responsibility This constitutes the annual report of Vodafone Group Plc (the ‘Company’) for the year Contents ended 31 March 2010 and is dated 18 May 2010. The content of the Group’s website (www.vodafone.com) should not be considered to form part of this annual report or the Executive summary# Company’s annual report on Form 20-F. 1 Highlights 2 Chairman’s statement In the discussion of the Group’s reported financial position, operating results and cash flow 4 Telecommunications industry for the year ended 31 March 2010, information is presented to provide readers with additional financial information that is regularly reviewed by management. However this 6 Chief Executive’s review additional information is not uniformly defined by all companies, including those in the 10 Global presence Group’s industry. Accordingly, it may not be comparable with similarly titled measures and # disclosures by other companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Guidance Systems Expanding Options
    Michael L. Sena Consulting AB Mobility Research Report Route Guidance Systems Expanding Options for the Market Author: Michael L. Sena Original Date of Writing: March 15, 2005 Revision Date: Number: POSP009 Recipients: Date Provided: (REF: \GENERAL\POSP009_VO3) Note: This Mobility Research Report is provided to the recipient on the condition that it is not copied or distributed in any form without the express written consent of the author. The Mobility Research Report is Copyrighted © Michael L. Sena. MICHAEL L. SENA CONSULTING AB Åsa Stationsväg 22 • S-430 31 Åsa • Sweden Phone: +46 340 656 890 • Fax: + 46 340 656 880 Mobile: +46 733 961 341 E-MAIL - [email protected] . MARCH 15, 2005. MOBILITY RESEARCH REPORT II . Preface Mobility Research Reports are intended to generate discussion within the Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) community. The community is defined in its broadest scope, and includes environmental and city planners and map and travel guide publishers, as well as the individuals associated with organizations that have thus far been the drivers behind ITS efforts. This widening of the forum for discussion is recognition of the important role that can be played by those who are responsible for designing the environments in which ITS solutions will operate, and by those who have traditionally provided the tools used for human orientation and wayfinding. Each paper expresses the personal views of the author, with a focus on the interrelationships between the designs of the systems, services and infrastructure which are proposed to improve personal and collective mobility, and the planning and design of our habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Color Process
    Telecom, Media & Entertainment the way we see it TechnoVision™ 2012 in the TME Industry Telecom & Media Insights Issue 44 Contents 1 Abstract 2 2 TechnoVision™ in TME 3 – Introduction – TechnoVision™ – You Experience – We Collaborate – Process-on-the-fly – Thriving on Data – Sector-as-a-Service – Invisible Infostructure – LiberArchitecture 3 Putting TechnoVision™ into Practice in TME 8 – New Revenue Streams – Transformation to Cut Costs – Recreate Barriers to Entry – Convergence and the Digital Supply Chain Telecom, Media & Entertainment the way we see it 1 Abstract The Telecom, Media and Entertainment (TME) industries are highly technology-dependant and prone to rapid and disruptive changes due to the evolution of technology. Capgemini’s TechnoVision framework is designed to enable organizations align technology trends with business objectives. The framework identifies twenty-two developing technologies that are mapped to six operational and one technology cluster. Developments in access technologies and devices are enabling highly personalized and rich multimedia services delivery, allowing TME players to create the “You Experience” for consumers. The changing nature of services is mandating that TME players look outside their organizations for sources of innovation. Telecom players are achieving this by leveraging the “We Collaborate” cluster – many are opening up their network and data assets in a controlled manner to the external development community through Open Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). The new environment also demands a high-level of agility from TME players, and requires organizations to adopt “Process-on-the-fly”, which refers to modular, reusable process and IT solutions that allow companies to respond to change in real-time. TME players are increasingly “Thriving on Data”, as new business models and services are expected to make extensive use of customer data analytics.
    [Show full text]
  • Vodafone Italia Bilancio Di Responsabilità 2008 - 2009
    Vodafone Italia e il Gruppo Vodafone Vodafone Vodafone Italia Bilancio di Responsabilità 2008 - 2009 We said, we have, we will. 1 Vodafone Italia Bilancio di Responsabilità 2008 - 2009 We said, we have, we will. Contributo in sintesi di Vodafone Italia al Paese 4 Lettera del Presidente e dell’Amministratore Delegato 5 indice Premessa metodologica 7 Verifica del Bilancio di Responsabilità 9 Vodafone Italia e il Gruppo Vodafone 11 La CR in Vodafone Italia e nel Gruppo Vodafone 17 La Governance di Vodafone Italia 23 Il contesto regolamentare e il contesto legale 29 My Future 33 Sviluppo della rete e campi elettromagnetici 39 Efficienza energetica e cambiamenti climatici 45 Attenzione al cliente 55 Attenzione alle risorse umane 63 La Fondazione Vodafone Italia 77 Integrità dei rapporti con i fornitori 81 Performance patrimoniali ed economiche 85 Impegni per il futuro 95 Glossario e acronimi 103 3 Contributo in sintesi di Vodafone Italia al Paese 8.245 dipendenti (incluse 81 persone di Tele2) 25.000 persone occupate nell’indotto* 120.908 giornate di formazione erogate in un anno (personale interno ed esterno) 1.673 mln di euro a favore dell’Erario e di altre istituzioni pubbliche 17 mld di euro fra spese e investimenti realizzati in Italia negli ultimi cinque anni** 96% dei volumi di acquisto ordinati concentrati su realtà industriali italiane o sussidiarie locali di realtà multinazionali Fondazione Vodafone Italia: dal 2002 ad oggi realizzate 240 iniziative a favore del sociale, erogati fondi per oltre 38 mln di euro di cui il 40% investiti al sud * Stima interna Vodafone Italia ** Inclusi investimenti, spese operative, spese di acquisizione e retention dei clienti, remunerazioni, costi di materie prime.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressing Forward
    Pressing forward Vodafone Group Plc Sustainability Report For the year ending 31 March 2010 About our reporting About us This is Vodafone’s 10th annual Group report detailing the environmental and Contents social impacts of our business and covers the financial year ended 31 March 2010. About our reporting 1 Previously known as our Corporate Responsibility Report, in 2009/10 we changed the Customers change Climate Operations chain Supply Foundations Report scope Assurance against objectives Progress CEO message 2 title to Sustainability Report. We believe this shift in terminology better reflects the role Vodafone can play in promoting a more sustainable society (see our approach, page 5). About Vodafone 3 Our approach 5 This Report outlines our performance in 2009/10 on each of the environmental and social issues most material to our business. It also includes links to our sustainability Customers 15 website, where we provide more general information about our approach to each issue, Climate change 31 our policies and management processes. See www.vodafone.com/responsibility. Operations 40 Scope Supply chain 54 The scope of this Report includes sustainability data and activities from all local markets Foundations 59 managed by Vodafone for the full 2009/10 financial year, with the exception of Vodafone Report scope 61 Ghana and Vodafone Qatar (for more information see page 61). However, these markets are included in the discussion of issues where they are particularly material and we have Assurance 63 also included separate pullouts on both these markets to outline our progress there Progress against objectives 65 during 2009/10 (see pages 12–13).
    [Show full text]
  • POWER SHIFT 2 Cloud Services New Partnership Deals This Year Marked a Shift in Power in Mobile
    BUSINESS ANALYSIS For TELECOMS proFESSioNALS DEC 2010–JAN 2011 LEADER CONTENTS NETWORK STRATEGIES POWER SHIFT 2 Cloud services New partnership deals This year marked a shift in power in mobile. We look at 2010 show telcos are raising the stakes to provide cloud highlights as well as cloud services and fibre business models services to enterprises. TECHnoLogY TRENDS his has been the year when September it sold its 3.2% stake in merger and acquisition China Mobile for £4.3 billion and 6 Policy Tactivity sprung back to life with barely a whisper in November management in the telecoms and ICT sectors. offloaded its interests in Japan’s Mobile operators needing M&A activity accelerated as the Softbank for £3.1 billion. to better manage data year drew to a close as we showed in In mobile, at least, the global traffic flow and improve the last issue of Total Telecom Plus. balance of power is shifting towards service quality are looking to policy management. It is in the mobile sector where the BRIC countries and the Middle Ian Kemp Editor the biggest upheaval is playing out. East. That is sure to be reflected in OPerator RANKING Total Telecom Plus Bharti Airtel in April moved up to Total Telecom’s Global 100 ranking of 8 Global 100 the number five spot among global fixed and mobile network operators An extract from Total mobile operators by subscribers going forward. This year’s Global Telecom’s ranking of the when it bought the African assets of 100 marks the fall of Zain and world’s biggest network Kuwait mobile operator Zain for charts the major risers and fallers, operators, plus figures on US$10.7 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing in Times of Convergence: the Use of Strategic Alliances by Nokia, Apple and Google
    Competing in Times of Convergence: The Use of Strategic Alliances by Nokia, Apple and Google By Marina Shchipanova Master of Science Strategic Market Creation 27 October 2009 Copenhagen Business School Supervisor: Sigvald Harryson Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics 1 RESUME This thesis is focused on how firms use strategic alliances when competing in converging environments. I use a case study approach, combined with the research method of abduction. The companies chosen for case studies are Nokia, Apple and Google. In the recent years they have made some strategic choices that resulted in them becoming direct competitors. The industry where they are facing each other is mobile Internet services. An important element of their related strategies has been the use of strategic alliances. My goal is to explore and understand the motives behind their alliance strategies in the context of convergence. As the theoretical base of this thesis, I utilize theories on convergence, strategic alliances, and the compound product-service offering framework. I identify main points that would help me address the research question. For the empirical base, I use information on the case companies‘ strategies related to the mobile Internet services. Through the lens of the above mentioned theories, I identify the main trends and offer explanations on the industry developments and the alliance strategies. The main findings of this thesis are: 1) The case companies are now in direct competition with each other within the mobile Internet services industry. 2) The industry is undergoing a turbulent stage, accompanied by a search for a dominant platform. 3) The case companies are actively forming alliances with companies that possess complementary competences in the context of the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Publication in Accordance with Section 14, Sub-Sec
    Pflichtveröffentlichung gemäß §§ 34, 14 Abs. 2 und 3 des Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetzes (WpÜG) Aktionäre der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG, insbesondere mit Wohnsitz, Sitz oder ge- wöhnlichem Aufenthaltsort außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, sollten die Hinwei- se in Ziffer 1 „Allgemeine Informationen und Hinweise für Aktionäre“, Ziffer 6.8 „Mögliche Parallelerwerbe“ und Ziffer 11.9 „Hinweise für Inhaber von American Depositary Receipts“ dieser Angebotsunterlage besonders beachten. ANGEBOTSUNTERLAGE Freiwilliges Öffentliches Übernahmeangebot (Barangebot) der Vodafone Vierte Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH (deren Rechtsformwechsel in eine Aktiengesellschaft mit der Firma Vodafone Vierte Verwaltungs AG beschlossen wurde) Ferdinand-Braun-Platz 1, 40549 Düsseldorf, Deutschland an die Aktionäre der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG Betastraße 6 – 8, 85774 Unterföhring, Deutschland zum Erwerb sämtlicher nennwertlosen auf den Inhaber lautenden Stückaktien der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG für eine Geldleistung in Höhe von EUR 84,50 je Aktie der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG Darüber hinaus sollen die Aktionäre der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG an der durch Kabel Deutschland Holding AG für das am 31. März 2013 endende Geschäftsjahr angekündigten Divi- dende in Höhe von EUR 2,50 je Aktie der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG partizipieren. Wenn der Vollzug des Übernahmeangebots vor dem Tag erfolgt, an dem die Hauptversammlung der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG stattfindet, die über die Verwendung des Bilanzgewinns für das am 31. März 2013 endende Geschäftsjahr beschließt, wird die Geldleistung um EUR 2,50 je Aktie der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG erhöht auf EUR 87,00 je Aktie der Kabel Deutschland Holding AG. Annahmefrist: 30. Juli bis 11. September 2013, 24:00 Uhr (Ortszeit Frankfurt am Main) KDH Aktien: ISIN DE000KD88880 Zum Verkauf Eingereichte KDH Aktien: ISIN DE000KD88872 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Seite 1 ALLGEMEINE INFORMATIONEN UND HINWEISE FÜR AKTIONÄRE ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Update October 2009 MOBILE SECTOR
    INDEPENDENT TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH Sector Update MOBILE SECTOR BUCKING THE M&A TREND – October 2009 ACQUISITION VALUES UP 77% FROM 2008 Media & Technology After Numerous False Starts Mobile M&A Enters New Phase 750 65 63 2009 has seen a major turnaround in M&A activity in the mobile sector with YTD 650 603 60 transaction value reaching $603m vs. $340m in 2008 – an increase of 77%. 550 59 Sub-sectors that have received particular interest include Advertising, Payments 450 55 340 350 and Entertainment as strategic players seek to fill gaps in their portfolio and lay 250 50 foundations for new revenue streams. 150 Transaction Number Transaction Value ($m) 45 50 (50) 40 Jan - Sep 2008 Jan - Sep 2009 Mobile Sector Overcoming Early Restraints and Entering Transaction Value Transaction Number Commercial Phase with Force Mobile Advertising Initially, many mobile players faced difficulties scaling their businesses due to limited infrastructure technologies, including handsets and wireless broadband. With the emergence of higher speed networks, intelligent (OS based) smartphones, and the iPhone in particular, consumers are using their mobile devices in a fundamentally different way – as extensions to their PCs. In parallel with this, operators have adapted their strategies to take advantage of the new data-usage revolution and are collaborating with device manufacturers, Mobile Payments and Billing developers and mobile technology companies to create engaging services for consumers. These factors have fostered a mobile internet installed base of over 100m in 2009 and it is our belief that finally the mobile infrastructure and ecosystem are in place for the industry to enter a new level of monetisation with significant M&A activity as a consequence.
    [Show full text]