El Sistema De Dominacin Azteca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

El Sistema De Dominacin Azteca UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE GEOGRAFÍA E HISTORIA Departamento de Historia de América II (Antropología de América) EL SISTEMA DE DOMINACIÓN AZTECA: EL IMPERIO TEPANECA MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Carlos Santamarina Novillo Bajo la dirección de los doctores José Luis de Rojas Gutiérrez de Gandarilla Madrid, 2005 ISBN:84-669-2855-3 TESIS DOCTORAL DE CARLOS SANTAMARINA NOVILLO EL SISTEMA DE DOMINACIÓN AZTECA: EL IMPERIO TEPANECA DIRECTOR: JOSÉ LUIS DE ROJAS Y GUTIÉRREZ DE GANDARILLA UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE GEOGRAFÍA E HISTORIA DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTORIA DE AMÉRICA II (ANTROPOLOGÍA DE AMÉRICA) - Junio de 2005 - EL SISTEMA DE DOMINACIÓN AZTECA: EL IMPERIO TEPANECA - CARLOS SANTAMARINA NOVILLO - Tesis Doctoral de Carlos Santamarina Novillo Director: José Luis de Rojas y Gutiérrez de Gandarilla Universidad Complutense de Madrid Facultad de Geografía e Historia Departamento de Historia de América II (Antropología de América) Madrid, Junio de 2005. ÍNDICE GENERAL Índice de figuras .......................................................................................................................12 Agradecimientos ......................................................................................................................16 INTRODUCCIÓN Preámbulo .................................................................................................................................23 Objetivos, fuentes y método...............................................................................................23 Planteamiento de la obra ...................................................................................................27 Algunas precisiones terminológicas ..................................................................................29 El gentilicio azteca ...........................................................................................................30 Convenciones utilizadas....................................................................................................34 I. Los sistemas de dominación: problemas y propuestas ...................................................37 1. Clases y estamentos................................................................................................. 41 2. Dominación externa o de conquista...................................................................... 43 3. La política postconquista........................................................................................ 46 4. Estadios culturales y modelos de conquista........................................................ 49 5. Ideología dominante y crítica de fuentes.............................................................. 55 6. Dominación como intercambio de servicios........................................................ 59 7. De la teoría a la práctica de la investigación ....................................................... 62 PRIMERA PARTE: EL SISTEMA DE DOMINACIÓN AZTECA II. Organización social y política entre los aztecas ..............................................................67 1. La Cultura Azteca en la evolución histórica de Mesoamérica.......................... 67 2. Sociedad y política entre los aztecas..................................................................... 76 Organización social................................................................................................. 76 Organización política.............................................................................................. 80 3. Alianzas matrimoniales y sucesión dinástica...................................................... 85 4. Mezcla étnica y entreveramiento.......................................................................... 93 5. El Imperio Mexica de la Triple Alianza................................................................ 96 Estructura político-territorial................................................................................. 96 El sistema tributario y las divisiones provinciales................................................ 102 Expansión imperial y centralización política........................................................ 105 7 III. El modelo azteca de imperio........................................................................................ 109 1. Imperio hegemónico versus imperio territorial ..................................................110 2. El Imperio Mexica ante el modelo hegemónico .................................................113 3. Reflexiones en torno al modelo azteca de imperio............................................ 116 IV. Ideología y dominación en la sociedad azteca............................................................ 125 1. Conceptos teóricos................................................................................................. 125 2. La ideología dominante en la sociedad azteca................................................... 131 Temas fundamentales de la ideología mexica.........................................................131 Religión mexica y política...................................................................................... 132 Transmisión de la ideología estatal....................................................................... 135 Sacrificios humanos .............................................................................................. 141 Ideología de los dominados.................................................................................... 146 3. Historia, ideología y propaganda ....................................................................... 149 Memoria y olvido, ostracismo y propaganda........................................................ 149 Ancestros legitimadores........................................................................................ 153 Ritualización política de la guerra........................................................................ 154 4. Comunidad de intereses entre los pipiltin ......................................................... 158 5. El pacto social tenochca........................................................................................ 164 V. Política Postconquista azteca ...........................................................................................177 1. Definición y planteamiento ..................................................................................177 2. Referencias genéricas en las fuentes....................................................................181 El contexto novohispano: Zorita y Alva Ixtlilxóchitl ............................................190 Un testimonio indígena discordante......................................................................194 3. Estrategias de conquista........................................................................................195 4. Hacia un modelo de política postconquista .......................................................198 Sometimiento militar.............................................................................................201 Alianza matrimonial subordinante .......................................................................211 5. Consideraciones en torno a la política postconquista.......................................214 Tributo y reparto de tierras ...................................................................................218 Intrusión étnica y colonización .............................................................................220 Mercados................................................................................................................224 Hegemonía regional...............................................................................................226 Muerte de señores..................................................................................................227 Imposición cultural y religiosa ..............................................................................232 Destrucción de registros históricos........................................................................241 Residencia de señores.............................................................................................242 6. Hacia una tipología de los dominados ...............................................................248 8 SEGUNDA PARTE : EL IMPERIO TEPANECA VI. Las fuentes aztecas y el Imperio Tepaneca...................................................................259 1. Las fuentes aztecas: problemática general ...............................................................260 Los códices indígenas ...................................................................................................262 Obras y autores novohispanos .....................................................................................264 2. La crítica de las fuentes aztecas .................................................................................270 Acerca de la historicidad de las fuentes: una propuesta narratológica.........................271 3. El Imperio Tepaneca: fuentes e historiografía .........................................................280 Introducción.................................................................................................................280 La visión de los pipiltin...............................................................................................283 Fuentes para el estudio del Imperio Tepaneca..............................................................287 El Imperio
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Portraying the Here it is told and put forth how the ancient ones, those called and named Teochichimeca, people of Aztlan, Mexitin, Chicomoz- Aztec Past toca, as they sought and merited the land here, arrived and came into the great altepetl, the altepetl of Mexico Tenochtitlan, the place of renown, the sign, the site of the rock tuna cactus, in the midst of the waters; the place where the eagle rests, where the eagle screeches, where the eagle stretches, where the eagle eats; where the serpent hisses, where the fish fly, where the blue and yellow waters mingle—where the waters burn; where suffering came to be known among the sedges and reeds; the place of encountering and awaiting the various peoples of the four quarters; where the thirteen Teochichimeca arrived and settled, where in misery they settled when they arrived. Behold, here begins, here is to be seen, here lies written, the most excel- lent, most edifying account—the account of [Mexico’s] renown, pride, history, roots, basis, as what is known as the great altepetl began, as it commenced: the city of Mexico Tenochtitlan in the midst of the waters, among the sedges, among the reeds, also called and known as the place where sedges whisper, where reeds whisper. It was becoming the mother, the father, the head of all, of every altepetl everywhere in New Spain, as those who were the ancient ones, men and women, our grandmothers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers, great-great-grandparents, great- grandmothers, our forefathers, told and established in their accounts
    [Show full text]
  • Las Fuentes Aztecas Como Narración: Los" Casus Belli"
    LAS FUENTES AZTECAS COMO NARRACIÓN: LOS CASUS BELLI CARLOS SANTAMARINA NOVILLO UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID RESUMEN: PROPONEMOS AQUÍ CONTEMPLAR LAS FUENTES AZTECAS COMO NARRACIÓN LITERARIA, PARA APRENDER A RECONOCER SU COMPONENTE LITERARIO Y DE FICCIÓN, IDENTIFICANDO LOS ESTEREOTIPOS NARRATIVOS UTILIZA- DOS, Y ESTABLECER ASÍ LA NECESARIA DISTANCIA ENTRE LA NARRACIÓN Y LOS HECHOS HISTÓRICOS MISMOS OBJETO DE NUESTRA INVESTIGACIÓN. NUESTRA CONTRIBUCIÓN AQUÍ SE REFIERE A LAS CAUSAS INMEDIATAS –O CASUS BELLI– DE LAS GUERRAS MEXICAS SEGÚN LAS FUENTES AZTECAS NOS LAS PRESENTAN. ENTALES ARGUMENTOS ES POSIBLE RECONOCER, ADEMÁS DE LA INTENCIONALIDAD POLÍTICA DE LEGITIMAR LA AGRESIÓN DESCARGANDO SOBRE LOS OTROS LA RESPONSABILIDAD DE LA GUERRA, LA CONFLUENCIA DE FACTORES ECONÓMICOS Y POLÍTICOS EN LA EXPAN- SIÓN MEXICA. PALABRAS CLAVE: Fuentes, narración, Imperio contribution here refers to casus belli, or the Azteca, guerra, ideología, propaganda. events which were alleged in the Aztec sources as a justification of the Mexica wars. In such argu- ABSTRACT: We propose here a consideration ments, a premeditated political legitimation of the about the Aztec sources as a literary narration, in aggression can be recognised as well as a con- order to recognise their literary and fictitious fluence of economic and political factors in the component, identifying the narrative stereotypes Mexica expansion. used, and stablishing the needed distance between the narration and the real historical facts, which KEY WORDS: Sources, narration, Aztec Empire, are
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Ancient Mesoamerica, 12 (2001), 87 Copyright © 2001 Cambridge University Press. Printed in the U.S.A. SPECIAL SECTION: OTUMBA AND ITS NEIGHBORS INTRODUCTION we are using an etic concept that may be somewhat misleading In this issue we present the second part of the special section on with regard to the structure of the polity and the behavior of its recent research on Late Aztec Otumba, Tepeapulco, and Teotihua- residents. can by Thomas H. Charlton, Deborah L. Nichols, Cynthia L. Otis The Aztecs had their own emic term for their city-states. The Charlton, and their colleagues. The background to this research altepetl lay at the center of the organization of the Nahua world. was discussed by those authors in our previous issue (Charlton, The word itself can be glossed in English as “the water(s), the Nichols, and Otis Charlton 2000), and, as I pointed out in the mountain(s),” and, according to James Lockhart (1992:14), it re- introduction to the first part (Fowler 2000), a distinct advantage fers in the first instance to territory, but the intended meaning is provided by the Otumba research is that the data generated allow probably an organization of people holding sway over a given us to assess general models proposed for the origin and develop- territory. The constituent parts of the altepetl were the calpolli, ment of city-states in the Basin of Mexico during the last few and Lockhart (1992:17) notes that in many respects they were centuries before the Spanish Conquest. To summarize briefly, two microcosms of the altepetl.
    [Show full text]
  • "Comments on the Historicity of Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl, Tollan, and the Toltecs" by Michael E
    31 COMMENTARY "Comments on the Historicity of Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl, Tollan, and the Toltecs" by Michael E. Smith University at Albany, State University of New York Can we believe Aztec historical accounts about Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl, Tollan, and other Toltec phenomena? The fascinating and important recent exchange in the Nahua Newsletter between H. B. Nicholson and Michel Graulich focused on this question. Stimulated partly by this debate and partly by a recent invitation to contribute an essay to an edited volume on Tula and Chichén Itzá (Smith n.d.), I have taken a new look at Aztec and Maya native historical traditions within the context of comparative oral histories from around the world. This exercise suggests that conquest-period native historical accounts are unlikely to preserve reliable information about events from the Early Postclassic period. Surviving accounts of the Toltecs, the Itzas (prior to Mayapan), Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl, Tula, and Chichén Itzá all belong more to the realm of myth than history. In the spirit of encouraging discussion and debate, I offer a summary here of my views on early Aztec native history; a more complete version of which, including discussion of the Maya Chilam Balam accounts, will be published in Smith (n.d.). I have long thought that Mesoamericanists have been far too credulous in their acceptance of native historical sources; this is an example of what historian David Fischer (1970:58-61) calls "the fallacy of misplaced literalism." Aztec native history was an oral genre that employed painted books as mnemonic devices to aid the historian or scribe in their recitation (Calnek 1978; Nicholson 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • LOS REYES DE TOLLAN Y COLHUACAN·
    LOS REYES DE TOLLAN y COLHUACAN· HANNSJ. PREM La historia del centro de México se pierde algunos siglos antes de la conquista española en el crepúsculo entre historia, leyendas y mitos. Exactamente en este momento transitorio se sitúa lo que las fuentes nos cuentan sobre la ciudad de Tollan, sus reyes, su esplendor y su caída. A pesar de lo poco que se conoce sobre el lugar histórico (no el escenario mítico) de Tollan, éste ocupa un papel central en el desarro­ llo de la configuración histórica del centro de México que existía en el momento de la conquista española, como lo han destacado los investi­ gadores eminentes Wigberto Jiménez Moreno y Paul Kirchhoffy, más tarde, Nigel Davies. Los acontecimientos acaecidos en Tollan1 o, mejor dicho, el significado atribuido a ellos en tiempos posteriores, no tienen importancia decisiva para la historia sólo del área adyacente, especial­ mente del Valle de México, sino también para regiones mesoamericanas más lejanas, como para el mejor entendimiento de la época posclásica temprana en la región Maya, fundamentalmente la de las tierras bajas. Las fuentes procedentes del Valle de México y las regiones vecinas ponen de manifiesto que casi cada "grupo étnico" tenía ciertas relacio­ nes, a veces bastante efímeras, con Tollan. Pero solamente Colhuacan, una ciudad pequeña de poca importancia política al momento de la Conquista española, reclamaba de manera comprensible y al parecer más o menos plausible una conexión dinástica con Tollan. Sin embargo, con una única excepción2 las fuentes disponibles no proceden de Col­ huacan misma sino que son referencias desde el punto de vista de Tenoch­ * Una versión española anterior fue preparada con la ayuda de Nydia Heber.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Nahuatl Poetry - Brinton's Library of Aboriginal American Literature Number VII
    Ancient Nahuatl Poetry - Brinton's Library of Aboriginal American Literature Number VII. Daniel G. Brinton The Project Gutenberg EBook of Ancient Nahuatl Poetry, by Daniel G. Brinton This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Ancient Nahuatl Poetry Brinton's Library of Aboriginal American Literature Number VII. Author: Daniel G. Brinton Release Date: April 30, 2004 [EBook #12219] Language: (English and Nahuatl) Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ANCIENT NAHUATL POETRY *** Produced by David Starner, GF Untermeyer and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team [* Transcriber's note: The following substitutions have been made for diacritical marks in the original text which are not available at DP: For vowels with a breve: [)a], [)e], [)i], [)o], [)u]. For vowels with a macron: [=a], [=e], [=i], [=o], [=u]. *] ANCIENT NAHUATL POETRY, CONTAINING THE NAHUATL TEXT OF XXVII ANCIENT MEXICAN POEMS. BRITON'S LIBRARY OF ABORIGINAL AMERICAN LITERATURE, NUMBER VII. WITH A TRANSLATION, INTRODUCTION, NOTES AND VOCABULARY. BY DANIEL G. BRINTON 1890 PREFACE. It is with some hesitation that I offer this volume to the scientific public. The text of the ancient songs which it contains offers extreme and peculiar difficulties to the translator, and I have been obliged to pursue the task without assistance of any kind. Not a line of them has ever before been rendered into an European tongue, and my endeavors to obtain aid from some of the Nahuatl scholars of Mexico have, for various reasons, proved ineffectual.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL NOT for DISTRIBUTION Figure 0.3
    Contents Acknowledgments ix A Brief Note on Usage xiii Introduction: History and Tlaxilacalli 3 Chapter 1: The Rise of Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1272–1454 40 Chapter 2: Acolhua Imperialisms, ca. 1420s–1583 75 Chapter 3: Community and Change in Cuauhtepoztlan Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1544–1575 97 Chapter 4: Tlaxilacalli Religions, 1537–1587 123 COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Chapter 5: TlaxilacalliNOT FOR Ascendant, DISTRIBUTION 1562–1613 151 Chapter 6: Communities Reborn, 1581–1692 174 Conclusion: Tlaxilacalli and Barrio 203 List of Acronyms Used Frequently in This Book 208 Bibliography 209 Index 247 vii introduction History and Tlaxilacalli This is the story of how poor, everyday central Mexicans built and rebuilt autono- mous communities over the course of four centuries and two empires. It is also the story of how these self-same commoners constructed the unequal bonds of compul- sion and difference that anchored these vigorous and often beloved communities. It is a story about certain face-to-face human networks, called tlaxilacalli in both singular and plural,1 and about how such networks molded the shape of both the Aztec and Spanish rule.2 Despite this influence, however, tlaxilacalli remain ignored, subordinated as they often were to wider political configurations and most often appearing unmarked—that is, noted by proper name only—in the sources. With care, however, COPYRIGHTEDthe deeper stories of tlaxilacalli canMATERIAL be uncovered. This, in turn, lays bare a root-level history of autonomy and colonialism in central Mexico, told through the powerfulNOT and transformative FOR DISTRIBUTION tlaxilacalli. The robustness of tlaxilacalli over thelongue durée casts new and surprising light on the structures of empire in central Mexico, revealing a counterpoint of weakness and fragmentation in the canonical histories of centralizing power in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuauhnahuac Ante La Hegemonía Tepaneca 1 Introducción: La
    CUAUHNAHUAC ANTE LA HEGEMONÍA TEPANECA 1 CARLOS SANTAMARINA NOVILLO Introducción: la hegemonía de Azcapotzalco En nuestro trabajo de tesis doctoral, a partir del marco político azteca genéricamente considerado, hemos tratado de determinar la extensión del imperio dirigido desde Azcapotzalco, las relaciones que unían a los diversos tlatocayotl sometidos con la metrópoli y cómo fue posible el triunfo de los insurgentes en la guerra tepaneca. Para ello, hemos definido previamente el problema de la que hemos denominado “política posconquista”, concepto con el cual nos quere- mos preguntar acerca de las medidas tomadas por el altepetl dominan- te tras haber sometido —mediante el uso efectivo o no de la violencia militar— a otro altepetl, de modo que ese estado de dominación fuera estable en el tiempo y contribuyera al engrandecimiento de la unidad política hegemónica.2 Nuestra propuesta consiste en estudiar las va- riantes políticas que nos ofrecen los diferentes estudios de caso, como el del país tlahuica que nos ocupa en el presente artículo. Una primera cuestión que está en el principio de nuestra conside- ración sobre el imperio tepaneca es el grado en que forma parte de una estructura política tradicional, común a otras realidades históricas si- milares del área, el que hemos denominado como sistema de domina- ción azteca. 1 Este artículo es producto de la tesis doctoral presentada por el autor en la Univer- sidad Complutense de Madrid, la cual fue aceptada para su publicación por la Fundación Universitaria Española con el título El sistema de dominación azteca. El imperio tepaneca. Agradezco los comentarios críticos de José Luis de Rojas y Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuauhtémoc's Heirs the Ordenanza Del Señor Cuauhtémoc Re-Visited In
    CUAUHTÉMOC’s HEIRS AMOS MEGGED The Ordenanza del Señor Cuauhtémoc Re-Visited In a recent study of the famous Ordenanza del señor Cuauhtémoc Perla Valle and Rafael Tena provide us with a scrupulous analysis and an excellent translation of the full text, the glyphs, the various depictions and Náhuatl annotations, the historic personalities, hydraulic works, and local ecology, seen on the cadastral map of attached to this manuscript. Nonetheless, throughout her study, Valle voices doubts as to the authen- ticity of the given date of execution of this map, which was supposedly composed in 1523, still during Cuauhtémoc’s lifetime and by his order; she is absolutely right to lean towards a far more probable date of com- position, around 1560, and bases her doubts on the Náhuatl paleogra- phy, which is visibly that of the 1560s and not of the 1520s, as well as on the dating of the hydraulic works that appear there. The date of 1523 can possibly be associated with the entire process of upheaval that took place around Lake Texcoco concerning the division of the waters and lands around it during Cuauhtémoc’s captivity. Ending her study, Valle makes an important emphasis when she adheres towards viewing this manuscript as perhaps an inseparable part of the Primordial Titles’/Techialoyans’ genre.1 She may well refer there to what I would like to further address here, namely, the powerful sense of the longue durée that this particular manuscript as well as the rest of the sources studied below manifest in conjunction with what the ‘’supra- texts’’ of Lake Texcoco’s social memory expresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Peoples Activity Sheet: the Aztecs
    Early Peoples Activity Sheet: The Aztecs Pre-Columbian life in the Americas: Social organisation, city life and beliefs 1. Where did the Aztec live? The Aztec lived in an area centred on the Valley of Mexico, which is a huge, oval region surrounded by mountains and volcanoes. The valley is the site of present-day Mexico City. 2. What was the name of the city at the centre of the Aztec empire? Tenochitilan was the city at the centre of the Aztec empire. 3. What did the Aztecs believe the gods needed to keep them strong? The Aztecs believed that the gods needed fresh blood to keep them strong. Many Aztec religious ceremonies included the killing of prisoners and other victims. Often, these ceremonies took place in temples at the top of pyramids. 4. Why did Montezuma I conquer new lands? A drought caused the crops to fail. Many thousands of the Aztec starved to death in the resulting famine. Montezuma was determined that that his people should not starve again so he set out to conquer lands to the south and east, where there was plenty of rain and crops grew well. 5. Under which ruler did the Aztec empire reach its height? The Aztec empire reached its height during the reign of Ahutizotl. He made the borders of the Aztec empire stronger and seized control of land to the north and west to protect his territory from the Tarascan. He also invaded areas to the south and east. Roles of key groups in society 6. Who was the Tlatoani? The tlatoani was a male member of the royal family who was chosen from a council of noblemen to rule all the land and people inside the Aztec empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basin of Mexico Pp
    Cambridge Histories Online http://universitypublishingonline.org/cambridge/histories/ The Cambridge World Prehistory Edited by Colin Renfrew, Paul Bahn Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139017831 Online ISBN: 9781139017831 Hardback ISBN: 9780521119931 Chapter 2.19 - The Basin of Mexico pp. 986-1004 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139017831.067 Cambridge University Press 2.19 THE BASIN OF MEXICO LINDA R. MANZANILLA Introduction Palerm, Piña Chan, Sanders and Wolf. The research objectives concerned environmental and settlement-pattern changes, Mesoamerica is one of the few areas in the world where archaic patterns of land use, relations between settlements, social, state societies emerged. In this vast territory that includes political and ceremonial control and so on (Sanders, Parsons & more than half of Mexico, as well as Guatemala, Belize and Santley 1979: 3). Twelve years later another conference took parts of Honduras and El Salvador, different types of states place, also headed by Eric R. Wolf, and a book was published coexisted in the so-called Classic Period (100–900 CE). This with the research results (Wolf 1976). chapter will deal with one of the major regions where large During the fifteen years after the first conference (1960–74), multiethnic states and cities developed, a volcanic and seis- William T. Sanders headed a large settlement-pattern project mic region characterised by a lacustrine environment and a in this important area, particularly around the lacustrine basin diversity of resources (obsidian to the northeast, aquatic ani- and immediate piedmont, as well as in the Valley of Teotihuacan mals and plants, forest resources, agricultural land, volcanic (Sanders, Parsons & Santley 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • El Método De Galarza Aplicado Al Mapa De Otumba, Un Documento Pictográfico Poco Conocido Del México Colonial Desacatos, Núm
    Desacatos ISSN: 1607-050X [email protected] Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social México Genotte, Jean François El método de Galarza aplicado al Mapa de Otumba, un documento pictográfico poco conocido del México colonial Desacatos, núm. 22, septiembre-diciembre, 2006, pp. 119-134 Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=13902206 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto El método de Galarza aplicado al Mapa de Otumba, un documento pictográfico poco conocido del México colonial Jean-François Genotte En 1994 el autor emprendió el estudio iconográfico y la interpretación completa del Mapa de Otum- ba, un documento pictográfico del siglo XVI que representa ciertos lugares de los alrededores de Otumba (México). Un cuidadoso análisis del documento con el método de Joaquín Galarza reveló la asombrosa riqueza de su contenido.El mapa representa una sección pequeña del altepetl de Otompan (Otumba) y de sus sucesores administrativos durante la Colonia, la parroquia y el corregimiento de Otumba. El análisis de los elementos del mapa permite definir su localización geográfica y su pro- bable datación. Al mismo tiempo, pone en relieve los cambios en la organización sociopolítica y religiosa de los pueblos indígenas durante los primeros cincuenta años del periodo colonial tem- prano. 4 PALABRAS CLAVE: Otumba, altepetl, mapa, escritura pictográfica In 1994, Joaquín Galarza entrusted me a detailed iconographical study and interpretation of the Map of Otumba, a sixteenth-century pictographical manuscript which represents some places near Otum- ba (Mexico).
    [Show full text]