DOCSLIB.ORG

General Election of Greater London Councillors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Election of Greater London Councillors GENERAL ELECTION OF GREATER LONDON COUNCILLORS 9 APRIL 1964 Compiled under the direction of the Clerk of the London County Council and Returning Officer September, 1964 Published by LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL The County Hall, London, SE1 No. 4258 1s. Postage extra CONTENTS ELECTION FACTS AND FIGURES Page 3 IN EACH ELECTORAL AREA: VOTES CAST FOR EACH CANDIDATE Pages 5-7 NUMBER OF ELECTORS ENTITLED TO VOTE, AND PERCENTAGE VOTING Page 8 NUMBER OF ELECTORS VOTING DURING EACH HOUR OF THE POLL Page 9 PERCENTAGE OF ELECTORS VOTING DURING EACH HOUR OF THE POLL Page 10 3 Under the provisions of the London Government Act 1963 Greater London comprises the whole of the present Administrative County of London and the county boroughs of Croydon, East Ham and West Ham, practically all of the County of Middlesex and the metropolitan parts of the counties of Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent and Surrey. While the Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent and Surrey county councils will continue to administer the remaining parts of their present areas, all other existing local authorities and areas within Greater London, except in the case of the City of London, will cease to exist after 31 March 1965. In their place will be Greater London and the Greater London Council and thirty-two London Boroughs, each with its own council. The first election of Greater London councillors was held on 9 April 1964 and of London Borough councillors on 7 May 1964. The composition of the Greater London Council is 100 councillors and sixteen aldermen. Initially each London borough (one of them - the City of Westminster - joined with the City of London and the Inner and Middle Temples) forms an electoral area returning two, three or four Greater London councillors; but when revised Parliamentary constituencies have been settled, each constituency will return one Greater London councillor. Councillors will hold office for three years and retire together. Elections will be held every third year on a day to be fixed by the Home Secretary. The aldermen, eight of whom will retire every third year, are elected by the councillors from among councillors or persons qualified to be councillors. The appointed day under the Act for the new councils to assume full power is 1 April 1965. The Greater London Council will have jurisdiction over an area of some 620 square miles with a resident population of 8,000,000 and a rateable value of £600,000,000. This return follows the series published by the London County Council after general elections of London County councillors. ELECTION FACTS AND FIGURES, 1964 Number of Candidates-all seats contested: 340 viz.: Conservative .. 100 Communist .. 36 New Liberal .. 3 Labour 100 Independent .. .. 9 Union Movement .. 2 Liberal 86 Ratepayers' Assoc­ Christian Independent .. 1 iation .. .. 3 Percentages of votes cast (main parties)-Con. 41.7 Lab.46.0 Lib. 10.3 Electorate 5,466,756 Persons voting 2,413,600 Percentage voting 44.2 Votes cast for each party Con. .. .. 3,147,805 Comm. .. 102,649 New Lib. .. 7,421 Lab. .. .. 3,467,634 Ind. 19,983 Chr. Ind. .. 2,895 Lib. 775,385 R.A. 17,574 U.M... .. 2,353 Electoral areas with poll 50 per cent and above Hounslow .. 55.7 Richmond upon Thames .. 53.6 Bexley .. 55.6 Ealing .. .. 51.8 Harrow .. .. 55.4 Merton .. .. 51.4 Bromley .. .. 54.5 Hillingdon...... 51.3 Barnet .. 53.8 Kingston upon Thames .. 50.1 In a further nine divisions the poll was still above the average of 44.2 per cent for this election Electoral areas with poll 25 per cent and below Hackney .. 22.4 Tower Hamlets .. 23.8 4 The following table shows the number voting and the percentage of the total poll recorded during each hour of the poll, arranged in numerical order: 1964 Hour Number of Percentage of persons voting total poll 7-8 p.m. .. .. .. 471,629 19.5 8-9 p.m. .. .. ·. 398,585 16.5 6-7 p.m. .. .. .. 359,084 14.9 5-6 p.m. .. .. .. 228,714 9.5 4-5 p.m. .. .. ·. 126,968 5.3 11-12 a.m. .. .. .. 119,963 5.0 10-11 a.m. .. .. ·. 116,645 4.8 3-4 p.m. .. .. .. 110,252 4.6 2-3 p.m. .. .. .. 102,639 4.3 9-10 a.m. .. .. .. 93,101 3.9 12-1 p.m. .. .. .. 91,518 3.8 8-9 a.m. .. .. .. 89,233 3.7 1-2 p.m. .. .. " 80,624 3.3 By post .. .. .. 24,742 1.0 Total .. 2,413,697t 100.0 t See note (a) page 8. NOTES The figures in Table I (pp. 5-7) are votes counted, of which the total is 7,543,699. The names of successful candidates, shown in heavy type, also give an indication of the number of seats available, two, three or four, in each electoral area. The number of valid ballot papers counted at this election was 2,405,890 which includes 503 papers 'rejected in part', i.e., papers in which only some of the total possible votes were valid. There were 7,710 ballot papers wholly rejected as invalid; these comprised 68 lacking the official mark; 4,308 where the elector voted for more candidates than he was entitled to; 418 marked so that the voter could be identified; 2,291 unmarked or wholly void for uncertainty; and 625 received from postal voters before the close ofthe poll which failed in various ways to comply with postal voting regulations. 6,243 spoilt papers were replaced. The total of ballot papers used, valid and invalid, but excluding spoilt papers, was 2,413,600 and this figure is used in Table /I (p. 8) for the number of ' persons voting " since each such ballot paper represents an elector who made an attempt to vote or to record a deliberate abstention. COMPOSITION OF THE COUNCIL FOLLOWING THE 1964 ELECTION Aldermen Labour .. 11 Conservative 5 total 16 Councillors Labour .. 64 Conservative .. 36 total 100 TOTAL SEATS BY PARTIES Labour .. .. 75 Conservative .. 41 5 TABLE I Number of votes recorded for each candidate at the General Election of Greater London Councillors, 9 April 1964 Successful candidates are shown in heavy type. BARKING CAMDEN Charles Prendergast,B.E. M. (Lab.) 25,380 Mrs Leila Campbell .. (Lab.) 38,198 Mrs Maud Ball .. (Lab.) 23,803 Louis W. Bondy .. .. (Lab.) 38,191 R. C. Denney .. (Con.) 7,653 Mrs Evelyn Denington .. (Lab.) 37,364 C. A. Pool .. (Con.) 7,547 Francis Bennett, C.B.E. C. H. C. Blake .. (Lib.) 4,625 J.P. .. .. .. (Con.) 30,096 J. D. Tyrrell .. (Li b.) 3,824 Mrs John Townsend .. (Con.) 28,723 K. Halpin .. (Comm.) 1,385 Miss I. C. Mansel .. (Con.) 28,588 BARNET A. J. F. Macdonald .. (Lib.) 4,839 P. B. Black, J.P. .. .. (Can.) 52,807 Miss J. M. Arram .. (Lib.) 4,614 Miss Jean L. Scott, B.Sc., M. S. Watson .. (Lib.) 4,087 .. (Comm.) 2,875 F.R.I.C. .. (Can.) 51,939 J. Nicolson ·. .. (Ind.) Colonel Sir Joseph B. W. Haines 1,016 Haygarth, C.B.E... .. (Can.) 51,612 CROYDON Reginald Marks, LL.B. .. (Can.) 51,053 John L. Aston, J.P. .. (Can.) 57,625 N. Birch ·. .. (Lab.) 34,303 G. W. Aplin, F.R.I.C.S., Mrs B. R. Scharf .. (Lab.) 33,230 M.R.S.H. .. (Can.) 57,237 .. (Lab.) 32,212 .. C. H. F. Reynolds P. A. Saunders .. (Can.) 53,828 .. (Lab.) 31,538 F. B. Groves Keith A. Edwards .. (Can.) 50,866 J. Webb .. .. (Lib.) 25,496 Arthur G. Edwards (Lab.) 34,927 .. (Lib.) 25,463 M. Medway F. T. Cole (Lab.) 31,840 (Lib.) P. H. Billenness 24,209 J. A. Clinch (Lab.) 28,957 (Li b.) 24,104 O. C. Williams S. Sutcliffe (Lab.) 27,752 (Comm.) 4,308 R. T. Gooding R. E. J. Banks .. (Lib.) 13,445 J. W. Pinder (Comm.) 3,409 Mrs B. M. Bashford (Lib.) 12,731 BEXLEY L. G. Pine .. .. (Lib.) 10,398 Edwin Furness, B.A. .. (Lab.) 41,300 R. F. Tapsell .. (Lib.) 10,112 J. N. Powrie .. .. (Lab.) 39,079 M. Rapaport .. (Comm.) 3,498 Robin Thompson .. .. (Lab.) 37,314 S. B. Stray .. .. (Ind.) 2,998 D. M. Fielding .. (Con.) 33,958 Jesse T. E. A. Waddell (Ind.) 2,578 A. F. Cobbold .. (Con.) 33,906 R. J. F. Monk .. (Con.) 31,939 EALING R. J. Marsh ·. .. (Lib.) 7,435 Peter E. Anderson .. .. (Lab.) 50,949 R. H. A. Saunders .. (Lib.) 6,770 Christopher T. Higgins .. (Lab.) 49,655 C. E. Wright .. (Lib.) 5,991 G. F. Palmer, J.P. .. .. (Lab.) 49,304 L. H. Smith .. (Comm.) 2,929 Mrs E. W. Jones .. .. (Lab.) 49,253 .. (Con.) 45,688 BRENT Lady Henniker-Heaton Mrs M. R. Forbes, C.B.E., J. H. Ward .. .. (Con.) 43,971 (Lab.) 46,786 Mrs E. L. Prodham .. (Con.) 43,118 J.P. .. .. .. (Con.) 42,894 Peter Otwell .. (Lab.) 46,307 R. F. Tovell .. .. (Lib.) 8,649 IIItyd Harrington .. (Lab.) 46,284 H. C. N. Baylis .. (Lab.) 45,552 J. E. Elsom .. (Lib.) 8,272 Frank Towell .. .. (Lib.) Miss R. G. N. Freeman S. E. Smith 7,448 .. (Lib.) 7,299 (Mrs Taylor) .. .. (Con.) 38,500 J. A. Sullivan L. .. (Ind.) 3,311 C. H. Ansted .. (Con.) 38,221 J. McConville .. (Comm.) 3,137 H. J. C. Faulkner .. (Con.) 38,079 H. A. Tank A. A. Berney .. (Con.) 37,892 ENFIELD E. Baker ·. .. (Li b.) 11,180 Sir Graham Rowlandson, J. E. C. Perry .. (Lib.) 10,727 M.B.E., J.P., F.C.A. (Can.) 37,527 .. (Lib.) G. Phelps .. ·. 10,416 Gordon Dixon, M.A. (Can.) 37,284 M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALAVES - the Blessley History
    Section 7 ALAVES - The Blessley History Editor’s Note - 1 When Ken Blessley agreed to complete the ALAVES story it was decided by the new Local Authority Valuers Association that it would be printed, together with the first instalment, and circulated to members. Both parts have been printed unamended, the only liberty I have taken with the text has been to combine the appendices. As reprinting necessitated retyping any subsequent errors and omissions are my responsibility. Barry Searle, 1987 Editor’s Note - 2 As part of the preparation of “A Century Surveyed”, Ken Blessley’s tour de force has been revisited. The document has been converted into computer text and is reproduced herewith, albeit in a much smaller and condensed typeface in order to reduce the number of pages. Colin Bradford, 2009 may well be inaccuracies. These can, of course, be corrected if they are of any significance. The final version will, it is hoped, be carefully conserved in the records of the Association so that possibly some ALAVES - 1949-1986 future member may be prepared to carry out a similar exercise in perhaps ten years’ time. The circulation of the story is limited, largely because of expense, but also because of the lesser interest of the majority of the current membership in what happened all those years Kenneth Blessley ago. I have therefore, confined the distribution list to the present officers and committee members, past presidents, and others who have held office for a significant period. The story of the Association of Local Authority Valuers 1. HOW IT ALL BEGAN & Estate Surveyors, 1949-1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Abercrombie's Green-Wedge Vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944
    Abercrombie’s green-wedge vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944 Abstract This paper analyses the role that the green wedges idea played in the main official reconstruction plans for London, namely the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944. Green wedges were theorised in the first decade of the twentieth century and discussed in multifaceted ways up to the end of the Second World War. Despite having been prominent in many plans for London, they have been largely overlooked in planning history. This paper argues that green wedges were instrumental in these plans to the formulation of a more modern, sociable, healthier and greener peacetime London. Keywords: Green wedges, green belt, reconstruction, London, planning Introduction Green wedges have been theorised as an essential part of planning debates since the beginning of the twentieth century. Their prominent position in texts and plans rivalled that of the green belt, despite the comparatively disproportionate attention given to the latter by planning historians (see, for example, Purdom, 1945, 151; Freestone, 2003, 67–98; Ward, 2002, 172; Sutcliffe, 1981a; Amati and Yokohari, 1997, 311–37). From the mid-nineteenth century, the provision of green spaces became a fundamental aspect of modern town planning (Dümpelmann, 2005, 75; Dal Co, 1980, 141–293). In this context, the green wedges idea emerged as a solution to the need to provide open spaces for growing urban areas, as well as to establish a direct 1 connection to the countryside for inner city dwellers. Green wedges would also funnel fresh air, greenery and sunlight into the urban core.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's 76
    CHILDREN'S 76 this Committee agree to make provision in revenue estimates for continuing, on a proportionate basis, the financial aid at present being afforded by Middlesex County Council to the extent shown hereunder to the Voluntary Organisations respectively named, viz.: — £ The Middlesex Association for the Blind ... ... 150 approx. The Southern Regional Association for the Blind ... 49 approx. Middlesex and Surrey League for the Hard of Hearing ... 150 approx. 27. Appointment of Deputy Welfare Officer: RESOLVED: That the Com­ mittee note the appointment by the Establishment Committee (Appointments Sub-Committee) on 16th November, 1964, of Mr. Henry James Vagg to this post (Scales A/B). (The meeting dosed at 9.10 p.m.) c Chairman. CHILDREN'S COMMITTEE: 30th December, 1964. Present: Councillors Mrs. Nott Cock (in the Chair), Cohen, G. Da vies, Mrs. Edwards, Mrs. Haslam, Mrs. Rees, Rouse, Tackley and B. C. A. Turner. PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS.—NIL. PART n.—MINUTES. 10. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 30th September, 1964, having been circulated, be taken as read and signed as a correct record. 11. Appointment of Children's Officer: RESOLVED: That the Committee re­ ceive the report of the Town Clerk that the London Borough of Harrow Appointments Sub-Committee on 16th November, 1964, appointed Miss C. L. J. S. Boag, at present Area Children's Officer Middlesex County Coun­ cil, to the post of Children's Officer in the Department of the Medical Officer of Health with effect from 1st April, 1965, at a salary in accordance with lettered Grades C/D.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government in London Had Always Been More Overtly Partisan Than in Other Parts of the Country but Now Things Became Much Worse
    Part 2 The evolution of London Local Government For more than two centuries the practicalities of making effective governance arrangements for London have challenged Government and Parliament because of both the scale of the metropolis and the distinctive character, history and interests of the communities that make up the capital city. From its origins in the middle ages, the City of London enjoyed effective local government arrangements based on the Lord Mayor and Corporation of London and the famous livery companies and guilds of London’s merchants. The essential problem was that these capable governance arrangements were limited to the boundaries of the City of London – the historic square mile. Outside the City, local government was based on the Justices of the Peace and local vestries, analogous to parish or church boundaries. While some of these vestries in what had become central London carried out extensive local authority functions, the framework was not capable of governing a large city facing huge transport, housing and social challenges. The City accounted for less than a sixth of the total population of London in 1801 and less than a twentieth in 1851. The Corporation of London was adamant that it neither wanted to widen its boundaries to include the growing communities created by London’s expansion nor allow itself to be subsumed into a London-wide local authority created by an Act of Parliament. This, in many respects, is the heart of London’s governance challenge. The metropolis is too big to be managed by one authority, and local communities are adamant that they want their own local government arrangements for their part of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Dials Guidelines
    Conservation area statement Seven Dials (Covent Garden) 7 Newman Street Street Queen Great akrStreet Parker Theatre London tklyStreet Stukeley New aki Street Macklin Drury Lane This way up for map etro Street Betterton Endell St hrsGardens Shorts Neal Street Theatre Cambridge ala Street Earlham Mercer Street omuhStreet Monmouth Dials page 3 Location Seven page 6 History page 10 Character page 19 Audit Tower Street page 26 Guidelines West Street hfebr Avenue Shaftesbury SEVEN DIALS (Covent Garden) Conservation Area Statement The aim of this Statement is to provide a clear indication of the Council’s approach to the preservation and enhancement of the Seven Dials (Covent Garden) Conservation Area. The Statement is for the use of local residents, community groups, businesses, property owners, architects and developers as an aid to the formulation and design of development proposals and change in the area. The Statement will be used by the Council in the assessment of all development proposals. Camden has a duty under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to designate as conservation areas any “areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or historic interest of which it is desirable to preserve.” Designation provides the basis for policies designed to preserve or enhance the special interest of such an area. Designation also introduces a general control over the demolition of unlisted buildings. The Council’s policies and guidance for conservation areas are contained in the Unitary Development Plan (UDP) and Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG). This Statement is part of SPG and gives additional detailed guidance in support of UDP policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, August 30, 1898
    5216 THE LONDON GAZETTE, AUGUST 30, 1898. DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACTS, 1894 AND 1896. RETURN of OUTBREAKS of the undermentioned DISEASES for the Week ended August 27th, 1898, distinguishing Counties fincluding Boroughs*). ANTHRAX. GLANDERS (INCLUDING FARCY). County. Outbreaks Animals Animals reported. Attacked. which Animals remainec reported Oui^ Diseased during ENGLAND. No. No. County. breaks at the the reported. end of Week Northampton 2 6 the pre- as At- Notts 1 1 vious tacked. Somerset 1 1 week. Wilts 1 1 WALES. ENGLAND. No. No. No. 1 Carmarthen 1 1 London 0 15 Middlesex 1 • *• 1 Norfolk 1 SCOTLAND. Kirkcudbright 1 1 SCOTLAND. Wigtown . ... 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 8 " 12 TOTAL 10 3 17 * For convenience Berwick-upon-Tweed is considered to be in Northumberland, Dudley is con- sidered to be in Worcestershire, Stockport is considered to be in Cheshire, and the city of London ia considered to be in the county of London. ORDERS AS TO MUZZLING DOGS, Southampton. Boroughs of Portsmouth, and THE Board of Agriculture have by Order pre- Winchester (15 October, 1897). scribed, as from the dates mentioned, the Kent.—(1.) The petty sessional divisions of Muzzling of Dogs in the districts and parts of Rochester, Bearstead, Mailing, Cranbrook, Tun- districts of Local Authorities, as follows :—• bridge Wells, Tunbridge, Sevenoaks, Bromley, Berkshire.—The petty sessional divisions of and Dartford (except such portions of the petty Reading, Wokinghana, Maidenhead, and sessional divisions of Bromley and Dartford as Windsor, and the municipal borough of are subject to the provisions of the City and Maidenhead, m the county of Berks.
    [Show full text]
  • Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront
    Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront 1. Introduction 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port 2.2. The medieval port 2.3. London’s Port trough the ages 3. The end of the harbour 4. The Revitalisation 4.1. Development of a new quarter 4.2. New Infrastructure 5. The result 6. Criticism 7. Sources 1. Introduction Docklands is the semi-official name for an area in east London. It is composed of parts of the boroughs of Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Newham and Greenwich. Docklands is named after docks of the London port which had been in this area for centuries. Between 1960 and 1980, all of London's docks were closed, because of the invention of the container system of cargo transportation. For this system the docks were too small. Consequently London had a big area of derelict land which should be used on new way. The solution was to build up a new quarter with flats, offices and shopping malls. Map with 4 the parts of London Docklands and surrounding boroughs (Source: Wikipedia.org) 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port Within the Roman Empire which stretched from northern Africa to Scotland and from Spain to Turkey, Londinium (London) became an important centre of communication, administration and redistribution. The most goods and people that came to Britain passed through Londinium. Soon this harbour became the busiest place of whole Londinium. On the river a harbour developed were the ships from the west countries and ships from overseas met. 2.2. The medieval port From 1398 the mayor of London was responsible for conserving the river Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • TWICE a CITIZEN Celebrating a Century of Service by the Territorial Army in London
    TWICE A CITIZEN Celebrating a century of service by the Territorial Army in London www.TA100.co.uk The Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association for Greater London Twice a Citizen “Every Territorial is twice a citizen, once when he does his ordinary job and the second time when he dons his uniform and plays his part in defence.” This booklet has been produced as a souvenir of the celebrations for the Centenary of the Territorial Field Marshal William Joseph Slim, Army in London. It should be remembered that at the time of the formation of the Rifle Volunteers 1st Viscount Slim, KG, GCB, GCMG, GCVO, GBE, DSO, MC in 1859, there was no County of London, only the City. Surrey and Kent extended to the south bank of the Thames, Middlesex lay on the north bank and Essex bordered the City on the east. Consequently, units raised in what later became the County of London bore their old county names. Readers will learn that Londoners have much to be proud of in their long history of volunteer service to the nation in its hours of need. From the Boer War in South Africa and two World Wars to the various conflicts in more recent times in The Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan, London Volunteers and Territorials have stood together and fought alongside their Regular comrades. Some have won Britain’s highest award for valour - the Victoria Cross - and countless others have won gallantry awards and many have made the ultimate sacrifice in serving their country. This booklet may be recognised as a tribute to all London Territorials who have served in the past, to those who are currently serving and to those who will no doubt serve in the years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Gb0046 D-Ebz
    GB 0046 D/EBz Hertfordshire Archives and Local Studies This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 38720 The National Archives HERTFORDSHIRE RECORD OFFICE D/EBz Deeds and other papers relating to Barnet and other parishes in Hertfordshire and Middlesex, 17th - 20th centuries, deposited between 1987 and 1992 by Messrs Boyes, Sutton and Perry. [Accessions 2292, 2414, 2693, 2711, 2733] Catalogue completed July 1993 EG HERTFORDSHIRE RECORD OFFICE D/EBz TITLE DEEDS Arkley D/EBz/T l 2 Jones Cottages 1863 ­ 1958 [Descent of title: James George Longham of Holborn, Middlesex, gent; William Temple of Sarratt, beer retailer; Henry Jones of Barnet, builder; Catherine Matilda Jones of Arkley, spinster; and Sidney John Bateman and his wife Florence [Original bundle] 14 items Barnet D/EBz/T2 Deed of Common Recovery concerning land in the 17 Dec 1825 manor of Chipping Barnet between Chadwick Marriott Walker Aytown of Edinburgh esq and his wife Eliza and Robert Longford of Gravesden, Kent, yeoman and his wife Jane D/EBz/T3 Abstract of the title of Messrs Morland and 1854 Wilkinson to freehold estates in Chipping Barnet and East Barnet D/EBz/T4 Unspecified land in High Barnet 1923 [Descent of title: William Hayes of Little Wittenham, Buckinghamshire, and Richard Raymond Weale of New Barnet] 2 items D/EBz/T5 32 Wood Street 1920 - 1966 [Descent of title: Henry Bennett of Hounslow, Middlesex, gent; Victor Alphonso Merchant of Barnet, general dealer; Annie Nellie Merchant of Barnet, wife of the above; Dorothy Bath of Barnet, married woman; Hubert Michael Cresswell Corfield of London, M.D ; and Marjorie Bateman of Barnet, widow] 11 items D/EBz/T6 5,6,7,8,9,10 Thornton Road - George Dickinson 1889 - 1918 Byfield of the City of London, gent to Samuel Dorman of North Finchley, Middlesex, estate agent; 8,9,10 Thornton Road - George Dickinson Byfield to William Marcos of Wandsworth, Surrey, gent; and 12,13,14 Thornton Road - William continued ..
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Completed Response to London Borough of Waltham Forest Development Management Policies Consultation
    APPENDIX 1 Completed Response to London Borough of Waltham Forest Development Management Policies Consultation Open Spaces Department Sue Ireland BSc, MSc, MIPGS Director of Open Spaces Mr Gordon Glenday Head of Planning Policy and Regeneration Telephone 020 8532 5305 Sycamore House Fax 020 8508 2176 Waltham Forest Town Hall Email sue.rigley @cityoflondon.gov.uk Forest Road Our ref LBWF/DMP London E17 4JF Date 17 September 2012 Dear Gordon, LONDON BOROUGH of WALTHAM FOREST DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES CONSULTATION RESPONSE of the CONSERVATORS of EPPING FOREST The Conservators of Epping Forest wholeheartedly welcome and support the Core Strategy (CS) Objectives and Policies upon which the Development Management Policies (DMPs) are founded. The Conservators also support the general approach taken to drawing out the DMPs from the CS and the justifications for the range and scope of the DMPs. In particular, the Conservators welcome the inclusion of Policy DM42 specifically recognising the strategic importance, contribution and significance of Epping Forest in the Borough. In the Appendix to this letter we set out our detailed comments on the DMPs and the accompanying Justification texts. These detailed comments have already been submitted online through the LBWF Planning Portal and are brought together here to provide a comprehensive overview of the Conservators‟ submission. We look forward to your Council‟s response to our submission and to further refinement of the DMPs, which we hope will provide the basis for a fruitful working partnership aimed at protecting and enhancing Epping Forest. Yours sincerely Paul Thomson Superintendent of Epping Forest Appendix –Response to LBWF’s Development Management Policies Consultation DM13 - Issues Correction to Green Box The Strategic Objective should be no.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 - County of London Sessions
    RESEARCH GUIDE 67 - County of London Sessions CONTENTS Introduction References and Catalogues Judicial Records Mental Deficiency Acts Licensing Records Indexes of records deposited with the Clerk of the Peace Parliamentary Deposited Plans Other copies of Parliamentary Deposited Plans Other Plans Highway Diversion and Stopping Up Orders Electrical Lighting Provisional Orders Introduction This research guide is a brief introduction to some of the more used series of records of the County of London Sessions. Until 1971 the Justices of the Peace for each county and many boroughs were responsible for holding Sessions of the Peace where criminal cases were tried before a jury. These were usually known as the Quarter Sessions because originally they were held four times a year, but in London they were held every month. More serious cases such as murder, rape, blasphemy, bigamy, libel, certain types of bribery and forgery, and offences under the Official Secrets Acts, were referred to the Central Criminal Court or outside London, to the assizes. The Justices also had other responsibilities including the confirmation of new licences granted to public houses, the stopping up and diversion of highways, and the registration and deposit of maps and documents for public record. The County of London was a new county which was formed in April 1889 from part of Middlesex north of the Thames and parts of Kent and Surrey south of the Thames. The Local Government Act 1888 which created the County of London also provided for a new court of quarter sessions which was given jurisdiction over the whole of the new administrative county except for the City of London which retained its own quarter sessions, the City of London Sessions, whose records are held by London Metropolitan Archives (CLA/047).
    [Show full text]
  • The Artist As Leader: Research Report. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University
    DOUGLAS, A. and FREMANTLE, C. 2009. The artist as leader: research report. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. The artist as leader: research report. DOUGLAS, A. and FREMANTLE, C. 2009 This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk The Artist as Leader Research Report Professor Anne Douglas Chris Fremantle On the Edge Research, Gray’s School of Art, The Robert Gordon University with Performing Arts Labs Cultural Enterprise Office Scottish Leadership Foundation 2009 The Artist as Leader Research Report Professor Anne Douglas Chris Fremantle On The Edge Research, Gray’s School of Art, The Robert Gordon University with Cultural Enterprise Office Performing Arts Labs Scottish Leadership Foundation Funded by: Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Research Networks and Workshops (Creativity) Scheme 2009 1 On The Edge Research Gray’s School of Art The Robert Gordon University Garthdee Road Aberdeen AB10 7QD www.ontheedgeresearch.org © Douglas, A. & Fremantle, C., 2009 ISBN 978-1-901085-98-3 Photographs courtesy of Susan Benn, Director of Performing Arts Lab 2 Acknowledgements The Authors wish to thank the other partners in the programme of work including Susan Benn and the team at Performing Arts Labs (PAL); Deborah Keogh and the team at Cultural Enterprise Office (CEO) including Tim Nunn; and Zoe van Zwanenberg of the Scottish Leadership Foundation. The Artist as Leader Research Report is the primary output from the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Research Networks and Workshops (Creativity) Scheme award. The Artist as Leader
    [Show full text]