International Journal for Philosophy and Theology PHILOTHEOS PHIL
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ISSN 1451-3455 UDC 1:2 е-ISSN 2620-0163 PHILOTHEOS International Journal for Philosophy and Theology Philotheos (Φιλόθεος) is an international scholarly jour- nal that provides a forum for a dialogue in philosophy and in theology respectively, with a special focus on the dialogue between the two. Founded in 2001, it brings together articles and book reviews of philosophical and 19.2 (2019) theological interest in the broader Christian tradition. Contributions are published in several European languag- es and they cover diverse field of inquiry from antiquity to the present. The overarching goal is to overcome the disciplinarian entrenchments in philosophy and theolo- gy and reintegrate professional questions with the need to answer to problems placed before us by life itself. PHILOTHEOS 19.2 2019 ΦΙΛΟΘΕΟΣ 19.2 (2019) PHILOTHEOS International Journal for Philosophy and Theology 19.2 2019 Sebastian Press GNOMON Center for Philosophy Los Angeles Center for the Humanities and Theology, Trebinje Belgrade 2019 ISSN 1451-3455 UDC 1:2 е-ISSN 2620-0163 International Journal for Philosophy and Theology Founding Editor and Editor-in-Chief Bogoljub Šijaković (Belgrade) Executive Editors Georgios Arabatzis (Athens), David Bradshaw (Lexington, KY), Predrag Čičovački (Worcester, MA), Alexey G. Dunaev (Moscow), Markus Enders (Freiburg i. Br.), Jens Halfwassen (Heidelberg), Andrej Jeftić (Belgrade), Dmitriy Makarov (Ekaterinburg), Mikonja Knežević (Kosovska Mitrovica), Vladan Perišić (Belgrade), Marko Vilotić (Belgrade) Book Review Editors Rade Kisić (Belgrade), Bogdan Lubardić (Belgrade) Editorial Board Petar Bojanić (Belgrade), Jean-François Colosimo (Paris), Ingolf Ulrich Dalferth (Claremont, CA), John A. Demetracopoulos (Patras), Darko Djogo (Foča), Christophe Erismann (Wien), Thomas Sören offmannH (Hagen), Vittorio Hösle (Notre Dame, IN), Georgi Kapriev (Sofia), Basil Lourié (Saint Petersburg), Krzysztof Narecki (Lublin), Gorazd Kocijančič (Ljubljana), Časlav Koprivica (Belgrade), Nicholaos Loudovikos (Thessaloniki), Dragan Prole (Novi Sad), Philipp W. Rosemann (Maynooth), Christos Terezis (Patras), Werner Theobald (Kiel), Maksim Vasiljević (Belgrade / Los Angeles) Editorial Assistant and Secretary Jovana Šijaković (Belgrade) Advisory Board Konstantine Boudouris (Athens), Thomas Bremer (Münster), Grigorije Durić (Düsseldorf ), Alois Maria Haas (Zürich), Christoph Jamme (Lüneburg), Václav Ježek (Prešov), Andrew Louth (Darlington), Klaus Müller (Münster), Friedo Ricken (München), Josef Seifert (Granada), Walter Sparn (Erlangen), Wolfgang Speyer (Salzburg), Torstein Theodor ollefsenT (Oslo), Christos Yannaras (Athens) ISSN 1451-3455 UDC 1:2 е-ISSN 2620-0163 International Journal for Philosophy and Theology PHILOTHEOS Vol. 19.2 (2019) pp. 145–292 Christos Terezis, Lydia Petridou: Investigating the terms of transition from a dialogue to dialectics in Plato’s Charmides .......................................................................................... 149 Branko Aleksić: L’image-représentation hypomnématique, tenant lieu du Platon non-écrit .......... 166 Srećko Petrović: Τὸν ἄρτον ἡμῶν τὸν ἐπιούσιον in Mt 6:11 as ‘Our Super-Substantial Bread’: Echoes of Some Patristic Interpretations in Contemporary Orthodox Understanding ...................................................... 184 John Zizioulas: Patristic Anthropology and the Modern World .................................................. 204 Larry Hart: Process Thought and the Eclipse of God ............................................................ 218 Abbas Ahsan: The Paradox of an Absolute Ineffable God of Islam ............................................ 227 Adalberto Mainardi: The Quest for Ultimate Freedom Person and Liberty in the Russian and Italian Personalism in the 20th Century .... 260 Radoje Golović: Eschatological Perspective of N. Berdyaev’s Philosophy of History ...................... 275 In Memoriam – Alfons Reckermann: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Werner Beierwaltes (8. 5. 1931 – 22. 2. 2019) .................................................................................. 284 Book Review – Bogdan Lubardić: Ph. W. Rosemann, Charred Root of Meaning (2018) ................................................................................................ 288 philotheos.gnomon.rs PHILOTHEOS International Journal for Philosophy and Theology Published by Gnomon Center for the Humanities, Belgrade in cooperation with Sebastian Press, Los Angeles Center for Philosophy and Theology, Trebinje Philotheos is indexed in the following databases: ATLA Religion Database, EBSCO Discover, Gnomon Bibliographische Datenbank, Google Scholar, International Bibliography of Periodical Literature on the Humanities and Social Sciences (IBZ), International Philosophical Bibliography, L'Année philologique, Philosophy Documentation Center, ProQuest Summon, Revue philosophique de Louvain, WorldCat Local. Call for papers Unpublished papers should be sent per e-mail to [email protected] prof. dr. Bogoljub Šijaković Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet “Philotheos” Mije Kovačevića 11b 11060 Beograd Serbia All rights reserved. © Gnomon Center for the Humanities, Belgrade CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 1:2 PHILOTHEOS : International Journal for Philosophy and Theology / Founding Editor and Editor-in-Chief Bogoljub Šijaković. - Vol. 1 (2001)- . - Belgrade : Gnomon Center for the Humanities, 2001- . - 24 cm Polugodišnje. - Uporedni naslov na grčkom jeziku. - Tekst na svetskim jezicima. ISSN 1451-3455 = Philotheos COBISS.SR-ID 185353479 Philotheos is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia Christos Terezis, Lydia Petridou: Investigating the terms of transition from a dialogue to dialectics in Plato’s Charmides Philotheos 19.2 (2019) 149–165 Christos Terezis Lydia Petridou Department of Philosophy, University of Department of Greek Civilization, Hellenic Open Patras, Greece University, Patras, Greece Investigating the terms of transition from a dialogue to dialectics in Plato’s Charmides Abstract: In this article, following the introductory chapters of the Platonic dialogue Charmides (153a1-154b7), we attempt to investigate the terms of transition from a simple dialogue to dialec- tics. Interpreting the expressive means used, we attempt to explain how Plato goes from historicity to systematicity, in order to create the appropriate conditions to build a definition about a funda- mental virtue as well as to set the criteria to be followed in a philosophical debate. Our study is di- vided in two sections, each of which is also divided in two subsections. In the first section, we in- vestigate the historical context of the dialogue and the terms of transition from a single dialogue to dialectics. In the second section, we attempt to define according to Socrates’ judgments the men- tal and moral quality of the young men as well as the terms and conditions of the right interlocutor. At the end of each section, we present a table of concepts to bring to light the conceptual structures that Plato builds, which reveal the philosophical development in this dialogue. Key-words: Plato, Charmides, dialogue, dialectics, historicity, systematicity Introduction TheCharmides , at least as to its form, is included in the first period of Plato’s literary activi- ty, since it involves Socrates and an unknown interlocutor. Yet, it is a dialogue that follows the method of nested stories, for Socrates is presented as someone who describes in indi- rect speech the argumentation on sophrosyne (temperance) that was used by him, Chaire- phon, Critias and the young beautiful Charmides. The debate is supposed to have tak- en place immediately after the Athenian philosopher came back from Potidea in 432 BC. The place of that debate is the palaistra of Taureas, where the protagonist meets some old friends and acquaintances. Taking into consideration that Socrates, at the age between for- ty and fifty, is presented as a man who becomes a friend or a special consultant of young men, or, their mentor, the main question raised at the beginning of the dialogue is whether there are any young men who excel at wisdom and beauty, or even both. In fact, the topic of the dialogue rebuilds the famous Platonic model of searching for a definition – in the sense not only of giving a particular name but also of defining moral thought and action, that is, a prolific combination of the Theoretical with the Practical Reason –, an attempt that leads to identifying a particular virtue, in this case self-control and self-awareness, with the Christos Terezis, Lydia Petridou 150 knowledge of good1. The whole discussion proceeds inductively and deductively, so the ac- tual question discussed is about the holistic virtue as a requirement for young politicians. Due to this holistic nature of virtue the Charmides could be easily described as a precursor of Plato’s middle dialogues. Furthermore, since, as already mentioned, the topic of the di- alogue is about building a definition related with moral behaviors, both individually and collectively, the purpose is actually to define a moral ideal, which is approached through the process of understanding the relations that should be developed between political fac- tors. It is to be mentioned here that the concept “political” is used to describe the all kinds of relationship in a state and not primarily the relationships of its institutions. In this study, we shall investigate the introductory chapters of the dialogue