DOCSLIB.ORG

Mini Pine PRA Datsheets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mini Pine PRA Datsheets 2014 On the cover: Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) in Randolph County, Alabama. The image was modified from a photograph taken by David Stephens. This photograph was provided by Forestry Images (www.forestryimages.org). Edited by: R.C. Venette Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN The authors gratefully acknowledge partial funding provided by USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Center for Plant Health Science and Technology. Contributing authors E.M. Albrecht, E.E. Davis, and A.J. Walter are with the Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. Table of Contents Draft Log ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 ARTHROPODS: BEETLES .................................................................................. 6 Chlorophorus strobilicola ............................................................................... 7 Dendroctonus micans ................................................................................... 14 Hylobius abietis ............................................................................................. 26 Ips subelongatus ........................................................................................... 41 Monochamus alternatus ................................................................................ 50 Monochamus saltuarius ................................................................................ 62 Monochamus sutor ........................................................................................ 71 Orthotomicus erosus ..................................................................................... 79 Tetropium fuscum .......................................................................................... 91 Tomicus destruens ...................................................................................... 101 ARTHROPODS: MOTHS ................................................................................. 113 Dendrolimus pini .......................................................................................... 114 Dendrolimus punctatus ............................................................................... 124 Dendrolimus sibiricus ................................................................................. 133 Dendrolimus superans ................................................................................ 134 Lymantria mathura ....................................................................................... 135 Panolis flammea ........................................................................................... 140 ARTHROPODS: SAWFLIES ............................................................................ 150 Diprion pini ................................................................................................... 151 FUNGI ............................................................................................................... 162 Cronartium flaccidum .................................................................................. 163 Leptographium truncatum .......................................................................... 178 Mycosphaerella gibsonii ............................................................................. 190 Phellinus noxius .......................................................................................... 199 PHYTOPLASMAS ............................................................................................ 212 ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’ ................................................................... 213 1 Draft Log July 2010: 1) Addition of CAPS-Approved Method for Survey and Key Diagnostics for all pests from the CAPS Approved Methods table (Appendix M in CAPS National Survey Guidelines). 2) Updated information in “Reason for Inclusion” and “Easily Confused Pests” sections from information listed in Appendix M. 3) Addition of Mycosphaerella gibsonii (Needle blight of pine), a pest on the FY2011 AHP Prioritized Pest List. 4) Addition of most current host/risk maps. February 2011: 1) Addition of Cronartium flaccidum (Scots pine blister rust), a pest on the FY2011 AHP Prioritized Pest List. March 2012: 1) Addition of datasheets for Dendrolimus punctatus and Panolis flammea. 2) Updated available maps and survey information. 3) Addition of Dendrolimus sibiricus datasheet placeholder. Datasheet is under development. 4) Addition of Diprion pini datasheet placeholder. An attractant is not available at this time for D. pini. 5) Removal of datasheet for Dendrolimus superans. An attractant is not available at this time for Dendrolimus superans. Dendrolimus superans should not be listed as a survey target for 2012 or 2013. 6) 2012 version posted to the CAPS Resource and Collaboration website. October 2012: 1) Removal of datasheet for Hylurgops palliatus. It is present in four states. It has been added to the 2013 Additional Pests of Concern List. 2) Removal of datasheet for Hylurgus ligniperda. In 2012, PPQ and the National Plant Board concurred on deregulating Hylurgus ligniperda. 3) Removal of datasheet for Sirex noctilio. It is present in several states and is no longer a PPQ Program Pest. 4) Removal of datasheet for Urocerus gigas gigas. August 2013: 1) Addition of Diprion pini datasheet. An attractant is now available for D. pini. Diprion pini may be included as a survey target for 2013. 2) Addition of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’ datasheet, a pest on the FY2014 AHP Prioritized Pest List. 2010-2013 Revisions by Talitha Molet, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST August, 2016: Removed outdated maps (Dan Mackesy, PPQ-CPHST). 2 Introduction Fig. 1. Total pine trees (Pinus spp.) on forestland based on 2004-2006 surveys (USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis). Pines (Pinus spp.) are remarkably diverse and abundant in the United States. At least 97 species occur in the country. Some are exotic to North America, but most are native. An estimated 54 billion pines occur in the contiguous United States on forestland acres. Pines dominate four forest type groups in the western United States: ponderosa pine, western white pine, lodgepole pine, and piñon pine-juniper. In 2002, these cover types accounted for 8.6%, 0.1%, 5.1%, and 1.0%, respectively, of total forestland area in the West including Alaskan forests (Smith et al. 2004). In the eastern United States, pines dominate four cover types: white-jack-red pine, longleaf-slash pine, loblolly-shortleaf pine, and oak-pine (mixed cover type). In 2002, these cover types accounted for 3.1%, 3.6%, 14.1%, and 8.8%, respectively, of total forestland area in the East (Smith et al. 2004). No Pinus spp. are listed as federally threatened or endangered, but five species (P. banksiana, P. echinata, P. pungens, P. resinosa, and P. virginiana) are considered threatened or endangered in at least one of six states. This document addresses 21 non-native species of insects and fungi that have the potential to adversely affect pines. Most of these species do not occur in the United States. However, at least four of the species are known to be established in pockets of the United States as a result of recent introductions. Established 3 non-native pests continue to present risks to pine forests as they spread into previously unaffected areas. Additionally, new geographic variants of established species may arise and impact pines in ways not previously known. The 21 species addressed in this document were considered a serious threat by the Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey or the North American Forestry Commission. This list was developed in consultation with the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and is not intended to address all exotic pests that may attack pines. In this document, we present biological details that are relevant to the survey and detection of each species. The following information can be found within each subsection: Pest Description - a description of the morphology of the species. For technical accuracy, most descriptions are quoted directly from taxonomic authorities. Biology and Ecology - a summary of the life history of each species in its native range. A particular emphasis is placed on when various life stages may be present and active. Pest Importance - a description of the ecological and economic impact each species may have. Impacts are not always limited to pine. Some pests also may be problematic on other trees, shrubs, or crops. Symptoms - a description of damage the species may cause on a host plant. This description may be useful for surveying pine stands. Known Hosts - a complete listing of plants on which the pest has been reported to feed. Not all host associations have been thoroughly tested. Known Distribution - a list of countries from where the species has been reported. Potential Distribution within the United States - a summary of regions within the United States that may have suitable environmental conditions for the species. Survey - available techniques that have been used to detect the species. This section includes the CAPS-approved method for surveying for the species. Key Diagnostics- available techniques that have been used to identify the species. This section includes the CAPS-approved method for identifying the species. Easily Confused Pests- a listing of other species that might
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS ROMANIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/28E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Romania. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Romania TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution and Historical Dynamics of Threatened Conifers of the Dalat Plateau, Vietnam
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF THREATENED CONIFERS OF THE DALAT PLATEAU, VIETNAM A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By TRANG THI THU TRAN Dr. C. Mark Cowell, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND HISTORICAL DYNAMICS OF THREATENED CONIFERS OF THE DALAT PLATEAU, VIETNAM Presented by Trang Thi Thu Tran A candidate for the degree of Master of Arts of Geography And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor C. Mark Cowell Professor Cuizhen (Susan) Wang Professor Mark Morgan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research project would not have been possible without the support of many people. The author wishes to express gratitude to her supervisor, Prof. Dr. Mark Cowell who was abundantly helpful and offered invaluable assistance, support, and guidance. My heartfelt thanks also go to the members of supervisory committees, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Cuizhen (Susan) Wang and Prof. Mark Morgan without their knowledge and assistance this study would not have been successful. I also wish to thank the staff of the Vietnam Initiatives Group, particularly to Prof. Joseph Hobbs, Prof. Jerry Nelson, and Sang S. Kim for their encouragement and support through the duration of my studies. I also extend thanks to the Conservation Leadership Programme (aka BP Conservation Programme) and Rufford Small Grands for their financial support for the field work. Deepest gratitude is also due to Sub-Institute of Ecology Resources and Environmental Studies (SIERES) of the Institute of Tropical Biology (ITB) Vietnam, particularly to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration Methods to Reduce Pine Weevil Damage to Conifer Seedlings
    Regeneration Methods to Reduce Pine Weevil Damage to Conifer Seedlings Magnus Petersson Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre Alnarp Doctoral thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp 2004 Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Silvestria 330 ISSN: 1401-6230 ISBN: 91 576 6714 4 © 2004 Magnus Petersson, Alnarp Tryck: SLU Service/Repro, Alnarp 2004 Abstract Petersson, M. 2004. Regeneration methods to reduce pine weevil damage to conifer seedlings. ISSN: 1401-6230, ISBN: 91 576 6714 4 Damage caused by the adult pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) can be a major problem when regenerating with conifer seedlings in large parts of Europe. Weevils feeding on the stem bark of newly planted seedlings often cause high mortality in the first three to five years after planting following clear-cutting. The aims of the work underlying this thesis were to obtain more knowledge about the effects of selected regeneration methods (scarification, shelterwoods, and feeding barriers) that can reduce pine weevil damage to enable more effective counter-measures to be designed. Field experiments were performed in south central Sweden to study pine weevil damage amongst planted Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) seedlings. The reduction of pine weevil damage by scarification, shelterwood and feeding barriers can be combined to obtain an additive effect. When all three methods were used simultaneously, mortality due to pine weevil damage was reduced to less than 10%. Two main types of feeding barriers were studied: coatings applied directly to the bark of the seedlings, and shields preventing the pine weevil from reaching the seedlings. It was concluded that the most efficient type of feeding barrier, reduced mortality caused by pine weevil about equally well as insecticide treatment, whereas other types were less effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Climate Change Impacts Report Card Technical Paper 12. the Impact of Climate Change on Biological Phenology In
    Sparks Pheno logy Biodiversity Report Card paper 12 2015 Biodiversity Climate Change impacts report card technical paper 12. The impact of climate change on biological phenology in the UK Tim Sparks1 & Humphrey Crick2 1 Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, CV1 5FB 2 Natural England, Eastbrook, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8DR Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 1 Sparks Pheno logy Biodiversity Report Card paper 12 2015 Executive summary Phenology can be described as the study of the timing of recurring natural events. The UK has a long history of phenological recording, particularly of first and last dates, but systematic national recording schemes are able to provide information on the distributions of events. The majority of data concern spring phenology, autumn phenology is relatively under-recorded. The UK is not usually water-limited in spring and therefore the major driver of the timing of life cycles (phenology) in the UK is temperature [H]. Phenological responses to temperature vary between species [H] but climate change remains the major driver of changed phenology [M]. For some species, other factors may also be important, such as soil biota, nutrients and daylength [M]. Wherever data is collected the majority of evidence suggests that spring events have advanced [H]. Thus, data show advances in the timing of bird spring migration [H], short distance migrants responding more than long-distance migrants [H], of egg laying in birds [H], in the flowering and leafing of plants[H] (although annual species may be more responsive than perennial species [L]), in the emergence dates of various invertebrates (butterflies [H], moths [M], aphids [H], dragonflies [M], hoverflies [L], carabid beetles [M]), in the migration [M] and breeding [M] of amphibians, in the fruiting of spring fungi [M], in freshwater fish migration [L] and spawning [L], in freshwater plankton [M], in the breeding activity among ruminant mammals [L] and the questing behaviour of ticks [L].
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Invasive Species and International Trade
    Forest Research Institute Alien Invasive Species and International Trade Edited by Hugh Evans and Tomasz Oszako Warsaw 2007 Reviewers: Steve Woodward (University of Aberdeen, School of Biological Sciences, Scotland, UK) François Lefort (University of Applied Science in Lullier, Switzerland) © Copyright by Forest Research Institute, Warsaw 2007 ISBN 978-83-87647-64-3 Description of photographs on the covers: Alder decline in Poland – T. Oszako, Forest Research Institute, Poland ALB Brighton – Forest Research, UK; Anoplophora exit hole (example of wood packaging pathway) – R. Burgess, Forestry Commission, UK Cameraria adult Brussels – P. Roose, Belgium; Cameraria damage medium view – Forest Research, UK; other photographs description inside articles – see Belbahri et al. Language Editor: James Richards Layout: Gra¿yna Szujecka Print: Sowa–Print on Demand www.sowadruk.pl, phone: +48 022 431 81 40 Instytut Badawczy Leœnictwa 05-090 Raszyn, ul. Braci Leœnej 3, phone [+48 22] 715 06 16 e-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction .......................................6 Part I – EXTENDED ABSTRACTS Thomas Jung, Marla Downing, Markus Blaschke, Thomas Vernon Phytophthora root and collar rot of alders caused by the invasive Phytophthora alni: actual distribution, pathways, and modeled potential distribution in Bavaria ......................10 Tomasz Oszako, Leszek B. Orlikowski, Aleksandra Trzewik, Teresa Orlikowska Studies on the occurrence of Phytophthora ramorum in nurseries, forest stands and garden centers ..........................19 Lassaad Belbahri, Eduardo Moralejo, Gautier Calmin, François Lefort, Jose A. Garcia, Enrique Descals Reports of Phytophthora hedraiandra on Viburnum tinus and Rhododendron catawbiense in Spain ..................26 Leszek B. Orlikowski, Tomasz Oszako The influence of nursery-cultivated plants, as well as cereals, legumes and crucifers, on selected species of Phytophthopra ............30 Lassaad Belbahri, Gautier Calmin, Tomasz Oszako, Eduardo Moralejo, Jose A.
    [Show full text]
  • And Its Glucoside in Pinus Sylvestris Needles Consumed by Diprion Pini Larvae
    Original article Quantitative variations of taxifolin and its glucoside in Pinus sylvestris needles consumed by Diprion pini larvae MA Auger C Jay-Allemand C Bastien C Geri 1 INRA, Station de Zoologie Forestière; 2 INRA, Station d’Amélioration des Arbres Forestiers, F-45160 Ardon, France (Received 22 March 1993; accepted 2 November 1993) Summary — The relationships between quantitative variations of 2 flavanonols in Scots pine needles and Diprion pini larvae mortality were studied. Those 2 compounds were characterized as taxifolin (T) and its glucoside (TG) after hydrolysis and analysis by TLC, HPLC and spectrophotometry. Quantitative differences between 30 clones were more important for TG than for T, nevertheless clones which presented a content of taxifolin higher than 1.5 mg g-1 DW showed a T/TG ratio equal to or greater than 0.5 (fig 2). Quantitative changes were also observed throughout the year. The amount of taxifolin peaked in autumn as those of its glucoside decreased (fig 3). Darkness also induced a gradual increase of T but no significant effect on TG (fig 4). Storage of twigs during feeding tests and insect defoliation both induced a strong glucosilation of taxifolin in needles (table I). High rates of mortality of Diprion pini larvae were associated with the presence of T and TG both in needles and faeces (table II). Preliminary experiments of feeding bioassay with needles supplemented by taxifolin showed a significant reduction of larval development but no direct effect on larval mortality (table III). Regulation processes between taxifolin and its glucoside, which could involve glucosidases and/or transferases, are discussed for the genetic and environmental factors studied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Entomologist
    The Canadian Entomologist Vol. 107 Ottawa, Canada, March 1975 No. 3 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ATTEMPTS BY INTRODUCTIONS AGAINST PEST INSECTS IN THE FIELD IN CANADA B. P. BEIRNE Pestology Centre, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia Abstract Can. Ent. 107: 225-236 (1975) This is an analysis of the attempts to colonize at least 208 species of parasites and predators on about 75 species of pest insects in the field in Canada. There was colonization by about 10% of the species that were introduced in totals of under 5,000 individuals, 40% of those introduced in totals of between 5,000 and 31,200, and 78% of those introduced in totals of over 31,200. Indications exist that initial colonizations may be favoured by large releases and by selection of release sites that are semi-isolated and not ecologically complex but that colonizations are hindered when the target species differs taxonomically from the species from which introduced agents originated and when the release site lacks factors needed for introduced agents to survive or when it is subject to potentially-avoidable physical disrup- tions. There was no evidence that the probability of colonization was increased when the numbers of individuals released were increased by laboratory propagation. About 10% of the attempts were successful from the economic viewpoint. Successes may be overestimated if the influence of causes of coincidental, actual, or supposed changes in pest abundance are overlooked. Most of the successes were by two or more kinds of agents of which at least one attacked species additional to the target pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Pinus Merkusii Growing in Central Thailand
    Environment and Natural Resources Journal 2020; 18(3): 234-248 Effects of Climate Variability on the Annual and Intra-annual Ring Formation of Pinus merkusii Growing in Central Thailand Nathsuda Pumijumnong1 and Kritsadapan Palakit2* 1Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol University, Thailand 2Laboratory of Tropical Dendrochronology, Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Thailand ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 5 Aug 2019 The research clarifies which climatic factors induce annual and intra-annual ring Received in revised: 3 Feb 2020 formation in merkus pine (Pinus merkusii) growing in the low lying plains of Accepted: 19 Feb 2020 central Thailand and reconstructs the past climate by using climate modelling Published online: 26 May 2020 derived from climate-growth response. Not only are climate variations longer DOI: 10.32526/ennrj.18.3.2020.22 than a century in central Thailand explained, but the study also explores for the first time the variability in climate using the formation of intra-annual rings in Keywords: Climate reconstruction/ Thai merkus pines. The tree-ring analysis of wood core samples indicated that Dendrochronology/ False ring/ the pine stand was more than 150 years old with the oldest tree being 191 years Merkus pine/ Pinus latteri old. The annual variation in tree growth significantly correlated with local climate variables, the number of rainy days in each year (r=0.520, p<0.01) and *Corresponding author: the extreme maximum temperature in April (r=-0.377, p<0.01). The regional E-mail: [email protected] climate of the Equatorial Southern Oscillation in March (EQ_SOIMarch) also highly correlated with the pine growth (r=0.360, p<0.01).
    [Show full text]
  • Softwood Insect Pests
    Forest & Shade Tree Insect & Disease Conditions for Maine A Summary of the 2011 Situation Forest Health & Monitoring Division Maine Forest Service Summary Report No. 23 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION March 2012 Augusta, Maine Forest Insect & Disease—Advice and Technical Assistance Maine Department of Conservation, Maine Forest Service Insect and Disease Laboratory 168 State House Station, 50 Hospital Street, Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 phone (207) 287-2431 fax (207) 287-2432 http://www.maine.gov/doc/mfs/idmhome.htm The Maine Forest Service/Forest Health and Monitoring (FH&M) Division maintains a diagnostic laboratory staffed with forest entomologists and a forest pathologist. The staff can provide practical information on a wide variety of forest and shade tree problems for Maine residents. Our technical reference library and insect collection enables the staff to accurately identify most causal agents. Our website is a portal to not only our material and notices of current forest pest issues but also provides links to other resources. A stock of information sheets and brochures is available on many of the more common insect and disease problems. We can also provide you with a variety of useful publications on topics related to forest insects and diseases. Submitting Samples - Samples brought or sent in for diagnosis should be accompanied by as much information as possible including: host plant, type of damage (i.e., canker, defoliation, wilting, wood borer, etc.), date, location, and site description along with your name, mailing address and day-time telephone number or e-mail address. Forms are available (on our Web site and on the following page) for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 UDAF Insect Report
    2019 Insect Report UTAH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD DIVISION OF PLANT INDUSTRY LARGE PINE WEEVIL H y l o b i u s a b i e ti s ( L i n n a e u s ) PROGRAM 2019 PARTNERS Insect Report MORMON CRICKET - VELVET LONGHORNED BEETLE - EMERALD ASH BORER - NUN MOTH - JAPANESE BEE- TLE - PINE SHOOT BEETLE - APPLE MAGGOT - GYPSY MOTH - PLUM CURCULIO - CHERRY FRUIT FLY - LARGE PINE WEEVIL - LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH - ROSY GYPSY MOTH - EUROPEAN HONEY BEE - BLACK FIR SAW- YER - GRASSHOPPER - MEDITERRANEAN PINE ENGRAVER - SIX-TOOTHED BARK BEETLE - NUN MOTH - EU- ROPEAN GRAPEVINE MOTH - SIBERIAN SILK MOTH - PINE TREE LAPPET - MORMON CRICKET - VELVET LONGHORNED BEETLE - EMERALD ASH BORER - NUN MOTH - JAPANESE BEETLE - PINE SHOOT BEETLE - AP- PLE MAGGOT - GYPSY MOTH - PLUM CURCULIO - CHERRY FRUIT FLY - LARGE PINE WEEVIL - LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH - ROSY GYPSY MOTH - EUROPEAN HONEY BEE - BLACK FIR SAWYER - GRASSHOPPER - MEDI- TERRANEAN PINE ENGRAVER - SIX-TOOTHED BARK BEETLE - NUN MOTH - EUROPEAN GRAPEVINE MOTH - SIBERIAN SILK MOTH - PINE TREE LAPPET - MORMON CRICKET - VELVET LONGHORNED BEETLE - EMERALD ASH BORER - NUN MOTH - JAPANESE BEETLE - PINE SHOOT BEETLE - APPLE MAGGOT - GYPSY MOTH - PLUM CURCULIO - CHERRY FRUIT FLY - LARGE PINE WEEVIL - LIGHT BROWN APPLE MOTH - ROSY GYPSY MOTH - EUROPEAN HONEY BEE - BLACK FIR SAWYER - GRASSHOPPER - MEDITERRANEAN PINE ENGRAVER - SIX-TOOTHED BARK BEETLE - NUN MOTH - EUROPEAN GRAPEVINE MOTH - SIBERIAN SILK MOTH - PINE TREE LAPPET - MORMON CRICKET - VELVET LONGHORNED BEETLE - EMERALD ASH BORER - NUN MOTH - JAPANESE
    [Show full text]
  • Panolis Flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller)
    Pine Beauty Screening Aid Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller) Todd M. Gilligan1 and Steven C. Passoa2 1) Identification Technology Program (ITP) / Colorado State University, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology (S&T), 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 U.S.A. (Email: [email protected]) 2) USDA-APHIS-PPQ, The Ohio State University and USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212 U.S.A. (Email: [email protected]) This CAPS (Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey) screening aid produced for and distributed by: Version 2.0 USDA-APHIS-PPQ National Identification Services (NIS) 30 Jun 2014 This and other identification resources are available at: http://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/taxonomic_services The pine beauty, Panolis flammea (Denis & Schiffermüller), is a serious pest of Pinaceae in Europe. Larvae have been recorded on Douglas-fir, fir, juniper, larch, pine (lodgepole pine, Scots pine), and spruce. Early instar larvae feed inside the needles of new growth and later instars feed on older foliage. Outbreaks of P. flammea in pine plantations in the United Kingdom and Continental Europe have caused damage to thousands of acres and resulted in significant tree mortality. In the UK, adults are present from March through May. Twenty to eighty year old pine monocultures are especially at risk, and lodgepole pine, common in the western U.S., has been attacked when planted in Scotland (see Bradshaw et al. 1983; Sukovata et al. 2003). Panolis flammea is a member of the Noctuidae (tribe Hadenini), the family of moths (Lepidoptera) with the largest number of total species and also the most pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Alien Species: the Application of Classical Biological Control for the Management of Established Invasive Alien Species Causing Environmental Impacts
    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/COP/14/INF/9 12 November 2018 ENGLISH ONLY CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Fourteenth meeting Item 26 of the provisional agenda* Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 17-29 November 2018 INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: THE APPLICATION OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ESTABLISHED INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES CAUSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Note by the Executive Secretary BACKGROUND 1. The Executive Secretary is circulating herewith, for the information of participants in the fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, a document on the application of classical biological control for the management of established invasive alien species causing environmental impacts. 2. The document is relevant to the work of the Convention on Biological Diversity, in particular with regard to addressing (a) tools for conducting analysis for the management of invasive alien species, (b) the risks associated with trade in live alien organisms, and (c) achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 9. 3. The document is being circulated in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. * CBD/COP/14/1. The application of classical biological control for the management of established invasive alien species causing environmental impacts Summary for Policy Makers Prepared by: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Species Survival Commission Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) *Note that the full report follows on from this Summary for Policy Makers document. Summary for policy makers Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) COP13 Decision XIII on Invasive Alien Species (IAS) recognized ‘that classical biological control can be an effective measure to manage already established invasive alien species’, and encouraged ‘Parties, other Governments and relevant organizations, when using classical biological control to manage already established invasive alien species, … [to take] into account the summary of technical considerations1’ that was annexed to the decision.
    [Show full text]