Higher Education Landscape: Fundamental & Policy Update

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Higher Education Landscape: Fundamental & Policy Update Education Market Monitor - March 2016 Highlights March 24, 2016 In this edition of our "Education Market Monitor," we highlight recent trends in the federal student loan portfolio, credit performance Michael Tarkan, CFA of federal and private student loans, recent FFELP developments, servicing and debt collection trends, and brief updates in the for- 202.534.1390 profit and online enabler sectors. On the policy front, we provide updates on the regulatory environment for student loan servicers, [email protected] the push for student loan refinancing legislation, and November's impact on the higher education landscape. As a reminder, this report Isaac Boltansky includes an assortment of data tracking recent trends and upcoming issues to watch in higher education. 202.534.1396 [email protected] Andrew Eskelsen Focus Items 202.534.1383 [email protected] Federal student loans - balances and credit. Federal student loans outstanding stood at $1.2T as of 12/31/15, up 7% YOY and Companies Mentioned nearly double the level in 2009. From a credit perspective, 90+ day delinquencies of 11.5% remain near all time highs and defaults continue to increase at a faster pace than the overall portfolio. Ticker Price Target Rating APOL $8.00 Neutral Private student loans - balances and credit. Private loans totaled ~$100B as of 9/30/15, or 8% of the $1.3T in total debt outstanding. DV $18.00 Neutral We estimate the top three lenders (SLM, WFC, and DFS) comprise 85% of total primary loan originations of approximately $8-$10B ESI NC Neutral annually while "marketplace lenders" like Social Finance (SoFi), CommonBond, and Earnest are driving growth in the refinance FMD $4.50 Neutral market, which primarily targets federal student loans. Private credit continues to hold up well, with delinquency rates for the top six NAVI $11.00 Neutral lenders at the lowest level since before the 2008 crisis. NNI $52.00 Buy ONE $4.50 Neutral Servicing and debt collection. As of 12/31/15, PHEAA and Great Lakes serviced $254B and $209B of loans, respectively, for 8.5M PFMT $2.50 Neutral borrowers each. NAVI and NNI serviced $194B and $156B, respectively, for 6.9M and 6.5M borrowers. The four TIVAS will receive SLM $8.00 Buy a relatively smaller share of new volume versus the non-for-profit (NFP) servicers from 3/1-6/30/15 due to recent performance metrics TWOU $36.00 Buy that ranked all of the servicers together despite varying portfolio composition. From a collection standpoint, we continue to await the award of ED's new unrestricted collection contract, but 5 unrestricted and 6 small business collectors are currently receiving new volume. For-profits and online enablers. Enrollment trends within the U.S. for-profit sector remain weak, regulatory scrutiny continues, and APOL agreed to be taken private for a relatively modest price. In the online enabler segment, TWOU continues to add new schools, verticals, and programs to its existing portfolio of top-tier institutions. Election Risk. Secretary Clinton's persistent under-performance with younger voters leads us to believe that she will aggressively advocate for her higher education plan during the general election which will drive headline risk for the whole industry. See Important Disclosures on page 33 of this report. Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC 2 Policy Corner Democrats will continue pushing the “In On March 15, almost 30 Senate Democrats introduced their higher education affordability package known as the “In the Red Act.” The the Red” legislation – which includes package would: (1) allow qualified federal and private student loan borrowers to refinance their loans into government-backed loans with student loan refinancing language – but lower rates; (2) expand federal financial support for community colleges; (3) be paid for through a series of politically divisive measures there is no path to passage in this Congress. including a change to the treatment of carried interest, an end to unlimited write-offs of performance-based executive pay, a prohibition on corporate inversions, an end to certain oil industry tax subsidies, and the enactment of the Buffet Rule. We continue to expect the campaign to generate headlines during the upcoming Higher Education Act reauthorization effort and on the campaign trail but there is simply no path to passage for this package as currently constructed. Secretary Clinton’s higher education plan Secretary Clinton continues to struggle among younger voters and as we head into the general election we expect her campaign to focus is not viable in its current form but intently on her higher education plan as a means of connecting with that voter demographic. Secretary Clinton has consistently struggled her difficulty with younger voters in the with younger voters and this election cycle is no different (e.g., she secured less than 20% of the under 29 demographics in both Iowa and primary suggests higher education policy New Hampshire). Our sense is that as Secretary Clinton shifts into the general election, she will begin aggressively advocating for her will play a central role in the general higher education plan which could pose headline risks and possibly even entice her GOP opponent to embrace similar proposals. Recent election campaign. polling shows that over 60% of all Americans, and 58% of Independents, agree with the idea that "no family and no student should have to borrow to pay tuition at a public college or university.” As a reminder, Secretary Clinton’s plan would: (1) reduce student loan rates for ~25M borrowers through broader refinancing programs; (2) simplify income-based repayment (IBR); (3) enact a “Borrower Bill of Rights” which would increase student loan servicer responsibilities; (4) increase federal incentives for state funding of higher education; and (5) institute some form of institutional risk- sharing for colleges. Secretary Clinton’s higher education proposal is prohibitively expensive which ensures that its passage is highly unlikely if she does eventually win the White House but we expect the headlines to ramp up as we head into the general election. The policy environment for student loan In recent months, there have been a series of negative policy developments for student loan servicers including: (1) in August 2015 servicers has been inhospitable and all Navient disclosed that it had received a Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) from the CFPB; (2) in September signals suggest that will not change in the 2015 the CFPB released a report that both highlighted issues in the student loan servicing market and suggested new standards; (3) the near future. CFPB’s fall 2015 supervisory highlights included a discussion of concerns in the student loan servicing market; (4) in September 2015 the Treasury Department, Education Department, and CFPB released a detailed report outlining servicing market issues; (5) in November 2015 the CFPB released its most recent rulemaking agenda and for the first time announced that it may propose new rules covering student loan servicers; and (6) in February 2016 Secretary Clinton told an audience that Navient was “misleading people” and “doing some really terrible things.” Even after the recent regulatory avalanche, all signals suggest that the policy environment for student loan servicers will remain inhospitable through the election and possibly beyond. In the coming months, we expect a CFPB enforcement action against Navient, an unsuccessful but aggressive push for student loan servicing changes in Congress, and persistent headlines from the campaign trail. The for-profit education industry’s On March 8 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected the for-profit industry’s push to repeal the Gainful Employment rule. Gainful Employment Rule challenge As a reminder, the Gainful Employment rule, which went into effect in July 2015, requires colleges to demonstrate that their graduates failed. earn enough money to repay their loans. Michael Tarkan, CFA | 202.534.1390 | [email protected] Isaac Boltansky | 202.534.1396 | [email protected] Andrew Eskelsen | 202.534.1383 | [email protected] Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC 3 Top GOP lawmakers show interest in In February 2016 the GOP leadership of both the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee sent letters tuition increases and college tax breaks. to 56 colleges and universities with more than $1 billion in assets with questions regarding tax-free investment earnings for schools, the tax deductibility of donations, tuition increases, and numerous other issues. The letter states: “Despite these large and growing endowments, many colleges and universities have raised tuition far in excess of inflation.” There will be a heated discussion about tuition increases and higher education tax policy when lawmakers begin their work on reauthorizing the Higher Education Act, but it is difficult to see how anything meaningful can get done on this issue given access concerns and the electoral dynamics of the topic. Higher Education Act headlines ahead but In 2015 lawmakers reauthorized the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), the federal law covering primary and secondary education, passage remains unlikely. which was an unexpected bipartisan accomplishment and sets the stage for lawmakers to consider the Higher Education Act (HEA) in 2016. Senate HELP Committee Chair Lamar Alexander (R-TN) appears committed to considering the HEA in mid-2016 which should shift the conversations to FAFSA simplification, streamlining of IBR options, student loan servicing, and higher education institutional risk-sharing. Our sense is that there is only a 30% chance that lawmakers reauthorize the HEA in 2016. Higher education priorities in 2017 will Higher Education Legislative Priorities in 2017 Under Different Electoral Outcomes* differ dramatically depending on the election but there are particular policy issues that will be in focus no matter who wins in November.
Recommended publications
  • SCHEDULE of INVESTMENTS MID-CAP 1.5X STRATEGY FUND

    SCHEDULE of INVESTMENTS MID-CAP 1.5X STRATEGY FUND

    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2020 MID-CAP 1.5x STRATEGY FUND SHARES VALUE SHARES VALUE COMMON STOCKS† - 39.5% United Bankshares, Inc. 118 $ 3,823 Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 19 3,802 FINANCIAL - 9.3% Highwoods Properties, Inc. REIT 95 3,765 Medical Properties Trust, Inc. REIT 489 $ 10,655 RLI Corp. 36 3,749 Brown & Brown, Inc. 215 10,193 Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. REIT 215 3,687 Camden Property Trust REIT 89 8,893 Selective Insurance Group, Inc. 55 3,684 CyrusOne, Inc. REIT 110 8,047 Rayonier, Inc. REIT 125 3,673 Alleghany Corp. 13 7,848 Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. REIT 124 3,670 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 46 7,628 Valley National Bancorp 369 3,598 Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. REIT 207 7,518 Webster Financial Corp. 82 3,456 STORE Capital Corp. REIT 216 7,340 Bank OZK 110 3,440 Reinsurance Group of Physicians Realty Trust REIT 190 3,382 America, Inc. — Class A 62 7,186 PROG Holdings, Inc. 62 3,340 Eaton Vance Corp. 104 7,065 Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. REIT 139 3,339 Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.* 47 6,973 Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. 189 3,283 Signature Bank 49 6,629 Alliance Data Systems Corp. 44 3,260 Lamar Advertising Co. — Class A REIT 79 6,574 Wintrust Financial Corp. 53 3,238 East West Bancorp, Inc. 129 6,541 CIT Group, Inc. 90 3,231 National Retail Properties, Inc. REIT 159 6,506 JBG SMITH Properties REIT 102 3,190 First Horizon National Corp. 507 6,469 Sterling Bancorp 177 3,183 SEI Investments Co.
  • Enforcing Federal Consumer Protection Laws

    Enforcing Federal Consumer Protection Laws

    FACTSHEET Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Enforcing federal consumer protection laws The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in the wake of the financial meltdown to stand up for consumers and make sure they are treated fairly in the financial marketplace. Supervising financial companies and enforcing federal consumer protection laws is core to the Bureau carrying out its mission. Since opening its doors in 2011, the CFPB has held law breakers accountable and helped consumers harmed by illegal practices. CFPB enforcement and supervision by the numbers . $11.9 billion: Approximate amount of ordered relief to consumers from CFPB supervisory and enforcement work, including: Approximately $3.8 billion in monetary compensation ordered to be returned to consumers as a result of enforcement activity Approximately $7.7 billion in principal reductions, cancelled debts, and other consumer relief ordered as a result of enforcement activity $398 million in consumer relief as a result of supervisory activity . 29 million: Consumers who will receive relief as a result of CFPB supervisory and enforcement work . $600 million+: Money ordered to be paid in civil penalties as a result of CFPB enforcement work 1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU – JULY 2017 Supervising financial companies The CFPB supervises certain companies to assess their compliance with federal consumer financial laws, to identify risks to consumers, and to help ensure a fair and transparent marketplace for consumers. In addition to its authority over banks and credit unions with assets over $10 billion, and their affiliates, the CFPB is the first federal agency with supervisory authority over certain nonbank financial companies. These nonbanks include mortgage lenders and servicers, payday lenders, and private student lenders of all sizes, as well as larger participants in the debt collection, consumer reporting, auto finance, student loan servicing, and international money transmission markets.
  • 2017 Annual Corporate  Governance Review

    2017 Annual Corporate  Governance Review

    2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes 2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes This page intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary & Acknowledgements 4 Methodology 6 PART 1 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL VOTING RESULTS Figure 1 Corporate Governance Proposals Submitted – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 2 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 3 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Table) 8 Figure 4 Summary Average Voting Results for Selected Proposals – 2017 (Table) 9 Figure 5 Proposals Relating to Board Issues – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 6 Proposals Relating to Shareholder Rights – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 7 Proposals Relating to Proxy Access – 2016 and 2017 (Chart and Table) 11 Figure 8 Sponsorship of Corporate Governance Proposals – 2016 and 2017 (Table) 12 Figure 9 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Company – 2017 (Table) 13 Figure 10 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Proposal – 2017 (Table) 18 Figure 11 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Sponsor – 2017 (Table) 23 PART 2 – SELECTED SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS – ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE Figure 12 Shareholder Proposals – Board Diversity, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 13 Shareholder Proposals – Political Contributions, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 14 Shareholder Proposals – Gender Pay Gap, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 32
  • Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Massmutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund Name Was Massmutual Premier Core Bond Fund

    Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Massmutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund Name Was Massmutual Premier Core Bond Fund

    Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 MassMutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund name was MassMutual Premier Core Bond Fund. Fund Weighting Security Name % Position Market Value USTREAS T-Bill Auction Ave 3 Mon 12.74 195,233,310 Us 2yr Note (Cbt) Sep21 Xcbt 20210930 10.04 153,783,578 Us Ultra Bond Cbt Sep21 Xcbt 20210921 3.37 51,640,250 Federal National Mortgage Association 3% 2.80 42,905,303 United States Treasury Bonds 3.5% 2.11 32,271,048 United States Treasury Bonds 2.25% 1.58 24,149,075 Federal National Mortgage Association 2% 1.39 21,330,781 Government National Mortgage Association 3.5% 1.29 19,783,269 United States Treasury Notes 0.5% 1.14 17,538,543 Us 5yr Note (Cbt) Sep21 Xcbt 20210930 1.12 17,156,727 Federal National Mortgage Association 2% 1.06 16,297,232 Federal National Mortgage Association 3.5% 1.06 16,265,953 BGME TRUST 2021-VR 2.99% 1.06 16,166,916 United States Treasury Notes 0.12% 0.97 14,904,792 Fnma Pass-Thru I 3.5% 0.76 11,608,875 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 2% 0.73 11,214,546 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3.5% 0.67 10,299,581 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.67 10,215,474 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.66 10,043,755 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.58 8,946,807 Government National Mortgage Association 2.5% 0.49 7,454,812 AT&T Inc 3.55% 0.44 6,810,636 JBS Finance Luxembourg S A R L 3.62% 0.43 6,547,970 Federal National Mortgage Association 3.5% 0.40 6,109,087 Government National Mortgage Association 3.5% 0.39 5,908,132 Government National Mortgage
  • Corporate Equality Index

    Corporate Equality Index

    Corporate NEWS Equality Index 2O2O Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Equality 1,059 of the Nation’s Largest Businesses Demonstrated Their Commitment to LGBTQ Equality and Inclusion CEI 2O2O Corporate Equality Index NEWS © 2020 by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation owns all right, title and interest in and to this publication and all derivative works thereof. Permission for reproduction and redistribution is granted if the publication is (1) reproduced in its entirety and (2) distributed free of charge. The Human Rights Campaign name and the Equality logo are trademarks of the Human Rights Campaign. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation and design incorporating the Equality logo are trademarks of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. ISBN-13 978-1-934765-44-9 ISBN-10 1-934765-44-9 CEI 2O2O Corporate Equality Index 3 Executive Summary 6 Equality at the Fortune-Ranked Corporate Companies NEWS 8 Accelerating Global Equality Equality Index 10 Spotlight: HRC’s Equidad Programs 13 Findings Rating Workplaces 14 Nondiscrimination Policies 2O2O on Lesbian, Gay, 16 Equal Benefits Bisexual, Transgender 20 Organizational Competency in LGBTQ Inclusion and Queer Equality 23 Public Commitment 24 Corporate Social Responsiblity 25 Equality in the Public Square 28 Rating System and Methodology 30 Criteria 33 Appendices 34 Appendix A: Employers With Ratings of 100 Percent 58 Appendix B: Ratings and Criteria Breakdowns 98 Appendix C: Ratings by Industry, Descending Score 140 About HRC Foundation’s Workplace Equality Program 140 Project Staff 141 Acknowledgments 142 HRC Business Council 1 CEI 2O2O “The impact of the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index over its 18-year history is profound.
  • Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc

    Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc

    Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc. PORTFOLIO AS OF MARCH 29, 2019 CURRENT NET ASSETS - $941,525,223 Principal Amount or Shares Value COMMON STOCKS - 95.0% Communication Services - 7.0% 587,961 AT&T, Inc. $18,438,457 473,872 Comcast Corp., Class A 18,945,403 232,549 Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. 3,511,490 182,607 News Corp., Inc. 2,271,631 58,721 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. 2,495,959 86,742 Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. 3,337,832 349,587 Telekom Austria AG 2,542,477 248,981 Verizon Communications, Inc. 14,722,246 TOTAL 66,265,495 Consumer Discretionary - 6.2% 52,335 Carnival Corp. 2,654,431 21,953 Columbia Sportswear Co. 2,287,064 129,434 D. R. Horton, Inc. 5,355,979 110,648 DSW, Inc., Class A 2,458,599 168,704 eBay, Inc. 6,265,667 39,507 Foot Locker, Inc. 2,394,124 11,912 Home Depot, Inc. 2,285,794 164,100 Isuzu Motors Ltd. 2,164,900 55,274 McDonald's Corp. 10,496,533 24,646 Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 2,824,924 98,800 Suzuki Motor Corp. 4,381,858 51,906 TJX Cos., Inc. 2,761,918 65,041 Tapestry, Inc. 2,113,182 38,319 Toyota Motor Credit Corp., ADR 4,522,408 30,590 Tractor Supply Co. 2,990,478 19,878 Yum! Brands, Inc. 1,984,023 TOTAL 57,941,882 Consumer Staples - 6.6% 110,660 British American Tobacco PLC 4,616,801 200,389 Coty, Inc. - CL A 2,304,473 29,168 Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  • SPECIALTY FINANCE MARKET UPDATE | FALL 2020 Houlihan Lokey Specialty Finance Market Update Dear Clients and Friends

    SPECIALTY FINANCE MARKET UPDATE | FALL 2020 Houlihan Lokey Specialty Finance Market Update Dear Clients and Friends

    SPECIALTY FINANCE MARKET UPDATE | FALL 2020 Houlihan Lokey Specialty Finance Market Update Dear Clients and Friends, We are pleased to present our Specialty Finance Market Update for the fall of 2020. We hope that you and your families remain safe and healthy and that your fall/Q4 is off to a great start. We wrapped up a relatively busy summer and remain encouraged by the “regular-way” new activity that picked up post-Labor Day. As always, please reach out if you’d like to connect or brainstorm any current needs or relevant topics with us. As in prior newsletters, we have included select recent transaction announcements, a public markets overview, and industry insights to help you stay ahead in our dynamic and constantly evolving industry. We hope you find this quarterly update to be informative and that it serves as a valuable resource to you in staying abreast of the market. We look forward to staying in touch with you. Regards, Brent Ferrin Director, Financial Institutions Group [email protected] 212.497.4203 Additional Specialty Finance Team Contacts Jonathan Sloan Oscar Aarts Managing Director, Director, Financial and Valuation Advisory Financial and Valuation Advisory [email protected] [email protected] 212.497.4232 212.497.7869 Specialty Finance Subverticals Covered ALTERNATIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSET-BASED LENDING AUTO LOANS/BHPH CREDIT CARDS DEBT BUYING/COLLECTION EQUIPMENT LEASING FACTORING FLEET LEASING HEALTHCARE FINANCE INSTALLMENT LOANS LITIGATION FINANCE PAYDAY LENDING/PAWN PREMIUM FINANCE POINT-OF-SALE FINANCE SMALL BUSINESS LOANS STUDENT LENDING TRANSPORTATION FINANCE 2 Houlihan Lokey is the trusted advisor to more top decision-makers than any other independent global investment bank.
  • Penn Series Funds, Inc. Schedule of Investments — March 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Limited Maturity Bond Fund

    Penn Series Funds, Inc. Schedule of Investments — March 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Limited Maturity Bond Fund

    Penn Series Funds, Inc. Schedule of Investments — March 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Limited Maturity Bond Fund Par Par (000) Value† (000) Value† ASSET BACKED SECURITIES — 27.6% ACIS CLO Ltd., Series 2014-4A Class B Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding Ltd., (3 M ICE LIBOR + 1.770%), 144A Series 2015-2A Class AR (3 M ICE 1.975%, 05/01/26@,• $ 1,261 $ 1,260,353 LIBOR + 1.080%, Floor 1.080%), Adams Mill CLO Ltd., Series 2014-1A 144A Class B2R, 144A 1.298%, 07/25/27@,• $ 1,357 $ 1,357,182 3.350%, 07/15/26@ 2,750 2,751,719 JFIN CLO Ltd., Series 2015-1A ASSURANT CLO Ltd., Series 2018-2A Class DR (3 M ICE LIBOR + 2.650%, Class A (3 M ICE LIBOR + 1.040%, Floor 2.650%), 144A Floor 1.040%), 144A 2.834%, 03/15/26@,• 1,500 1,457,273 1.264%, 04/20/31@,• 2,400 2,391,667 Marble Point CLO XVIII Ltd., Babson CLO Ltd., Series 2020-2A Class D2 (3 M ICE Series 2014-IA Class BR (3 M ICE LIBOR + 5.410%, Floor 5.410%), LIBOR + 2.200%), 144A, 2.424%, 144A 07/20/25@,• 2,500 2,500,987 5.651%, 10/15/31@,• 1,500 1,509,861 Series 2014-IA Class C (3 M ICE Navient Private Education Loan Trust, LIBOR + 3.450%), 144A, 3.674%, Series 2015-AA Class A3 (1 M ICE 07/20/25@,• 1,500 1,500,648 LIBOR + 1.700%), 144A, 1.806%, Barings CLO Ltd., Series 2017-1A 11/15/30@,• 1,500 1,546,166 Class B1 (3 M ICE LIBOR + 1.700%), Series 2014-AA Class A3 (1 M ICE 144A LIBOR + 1.600%), 144A, 1.706%, 1.923%, 07/18/29@,• 1,500 1,500,303 10/15/31@,• 1,499 1,525,185 Benefit Street Partners CLO VIII Ltd., Series 2015-BA Class A3 (1 M ICE Series 2015-8A Class A1AR (3 M ICE LIBOR + 1.450%), 144A, 1.556%, LIBOR
  • Fund Holdings As of 06/30/2021 MM S&P® Mid Cap Index Fund Northern Trust

    Fund Holdings As of 06/30/2021 MM S&P® Mid Cap Index Fund Northern Trust

    Fund Holdings As of 06/30/2021 MM S&P® Mid Cap Index Fund Northern Trust Fund Shares or Par Position Market Security Name Ticker CUSIP Weighting (%) Amount Value ($) Future on S&P MidCap 400 PR Sep21 0 0 1.00 1,800 4,846,320 Bio-Techne Corp TECH 09073M104 0.73 7,864 3,540,845 Cognex Corp CGNX 192422103 0.62 35,763 3,005,880 Molina Healthcare Inc MOH 60855R100 0.62 11,826 2,992,688 Fair Isaac Corp FICO 303250104 0.60 5,814 2,922,582 SolarEdge Technologies Inc SEDG 83417M104 0.60 10,527 2,909,347 XPO Logistics Inc XPO 983793100 0.59 20,563 2,876,558 Signature Bank SBNY 82669G104 0.59 11,650 2,861,822 Camden Property Trust CPT 133131102 0.54 19,774 2,623,417 Fixed Inc Clearing Corp.Repo 0 0 0.54 2,616,203 2,616,203 Graco Inc GGG 384109104 0.54 34,316 2,597,721 FactSet Research Systems Inc FDS 303075105 0.53 7,646 2,566,074 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc CDAY 15677J108 0.53 26,540 2,545,717 Brown & Brown Inc BRO 115236101 0.52 47,253 2,511,024 Masimo Corp MASI 574795100 0.51 10,220 2,477,839 Williams-Sonoma Inc WSM 969904101 0.51 15,399 2,458,450 Lennox International Inc LII 526107107 0.50 6,960 2,441,568 Steel Dynamics Inc STLD 858119100 0.50 40,629 2,421,488 Nordson Corp NDSN 655663102 0.50 10,916 2,396,171 Medical Properties Trust Inc MPW 58463J304 0.49 118,811 2,388,101 Trex Co Inc TREX 89531P105 0.49 23,300 2,381,493 The Toro Co TTC 891092108 0.49 21,624 2,376,045 RPM International Inc RPM 749685103 0.48 26,159 2,319,780 RH RH 74967X103 0.48 3,404 2,311,316 Axon Enterprise Inc AXON 05464C101 0.48 13,061 2,309,185 Cree Inc CREE 225447101 0.47
  • Investment Holdings As of December 31, 2019

    Investment Holdings As of December 31, 2019

    Investment Holdings As of December 31, 2019 Transparency of the Montana Investment Holdings The Montana Board of Investment’s holdings file is a comprehensive listing of all manager funds, separately managed and commingled, and aggregated security positions. Securities are organized across common categories: Pension Pool, Asset Class, Manager Fund, Aggregated Individual Holdings, and Non‐Pension Pools. Market values shown are in U.S. dollars. The market values shown in this document are for the individual investment holdings only and do not include any information on accounts for receivables or payables. Aggregated Individual Holdings represent securities held at our custodian bank and individual commingled accounts. The Investment Holdings Report is unaudited and may be subject to change. The audited Unified Investment Program Financial Statements will be made available once the Legislative Audit Division issues the Audit Opinion. Once issued, the Legislative Audit Division will have the Audit Opinion available online at http://leg.mt.gov/css/publications/audit/reports.asp and the complete audited financial statements will also be available on the Board’s website http://investmentmt.com/AnnualReportsAudits. Additional information can be found at www.investmentmt.com Table of Contents Consolidated Asset Pension Pool (CAPP) 4 CAPP ‐ Domestic Equities 5 CAPP – Core Fixed Income 24 CAPP ‐ International Equities 29 CAPP ‐ Private Equities 45 CAPP ‐ Real Estate 48 CAPP ‐ Natural Resources 50 CAPP – Non Core Fixed Income 52 CAPP ‐ Cash 62 Short
  • Quarterly Holdings Template 6-30-2021.Xlsx

    Quarterly Holdings Template 6-30-2021.Xlsx

    MML Series Investment Fund and MML Series Investment Fund II Portfolio Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Fund Name Asset Class Security Name Base Market Value Shares/Par Value Percent of Fund Interest Rate Maturity Date MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML GLOBAL FD 19797970.79 1267475.723 11.54079 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML FOCUSED EQUITY FUND 16027898.53 2016087.866 9.34311 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML MID CAP GROWTH FD 12519472.6 632616.099 7.29795 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML BLUE CHIP GROWTH FD 11389485.44 493906.567 6.639249 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML INCOME AND GROWTH FD 11088381.27 927122.18 6.463727 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML EQUITY INCOME FD 10378462.5 852790.674 6.049896 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML FUNDAMENTAL VALUE FUND 10262960.65 729421.51 5.982566 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUND 8761542.43 773304.716 5.107348 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML MID CAP VALUE FD 8723106.33 710929.611 5.084942 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML FUNDAMENTAL GROWTH FUND 8475444.38 679666.751 4.940573 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML FOREIGN FD 7841520.67 705807.441 4.571041 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML STRG EMERGING MARKETS FUND 7675189.26 496776.004 4.474082 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML TOTAL RETURN BOND FUND 5286620.8 474136.395 3.081719 0 MML Aggressive Allocation Fund EQUITY MML SMALL COMPANY VALUE FUND 4157279.35 233949.316 2.423394 0 MML Aggressive
  • New Covenant Growth Fund

    New Covenant Growth Fund

    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) March 31, 2020 New Covenant Growth Fund Market Value Market Value Description Shares ($ Thousands) Description Shares ($ Thousands) COMMON STOCK — 96.0% COMMON STOCK (continued) Bosnia and Herzegovina — 0.0% IMAX * 2,244 $ 20 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 248 $ 37 Intelsat * 8,389 13 – Interpublic Group of Cos Inc/The 8,487 137 Canada — 0.1% Iridium Communications * 366 8 Lululemon Athletica Inc * 1,014 192 – John Wiley & Sons Inc, Cl A 236 9 Cayman Islands — 0.0% Liberty Broadband, Cl A * 113 12 Herbalife * 1,088 31 Lions Gate Entertainment, Cl A * 7,278 44 – Ireland — 1.0% Live Nation Entertainment Inc * 181 8 Accenture PLC, Cl A 11,297 1,844 Match Group * 703 46 Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC * 616 62 Meredith 1,401 17 Mallinckrodt * 13,812 27 MSG Networks * 2,988 31 Medtronic PLC 19,976 1,801 New York Times, Cl A 1,515 47 NortonLifeLock 13,065 245 Nexstar Media Group, Cl A 455 26 Perrigo Co PLC 211 10 Omnicom Group Inc 10,137 557 Scholastic 1,266 32 3,989 – Shenandoah Telecommunications 1,286 63 Puerto Rico — 0.0% Sirius XM Holdings 7,153 35 Popular Inc 1,507 53 – Spotify Technology SA * 608 74 Switzerland — 0.0% Sprint Corp * 2,200 19 Garmin Ltd 1,092 82 Take-Two Interactive Software Inc * 830 98 – TechTarget * 1,986 41 United Kingdom — 0.2% TEGNA 3,052 33 Aon PLC 2,921 482 T-Mobile US Inc * 2,824 237 Healthpeak Properties 9,384 224 Twitter Inc * 7,369 181 706 – Verizon Communications Inc 62,462 3,356 United States — 94.7% ViacomCBS, Cl B 1,000 14 Communication Services — 8.3% Walt Disney Co/The 26,709