Federated Equity Income Fund, Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Equinix Inc (Eqix) 10-Q
EQUINIX INC (EQIX) 10-Q Quarterly report pursuant to sections 13 or 15(d) Filed on 04/27/2012 Filed Period 03/31/2012 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 000-31293 EQUINIX, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 77-0487526 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) One Lagoon Drive, Fourth Floor, Redwood City, California 94065 (Address of principal executive offices, including ZIP code) (650) 598-6000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) Yes x No ¨ and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). -
Interconnection
Interconnection 101 As cloud usage takes off, data production grows exponentially, content pushes closer to the edge, and end users demand data and applications at all hours from all locations, the ability to connect with a wide variety of players becomes ever more important. This report introduces interconnection, its key players and busi- ness models, and trends that could affect interconnection going forward. KEY FINDINGS Network-dense, interconnection-oriented facilities are not easy to replicate and are typically able to charge higher prices for colocation, as well as charging for cross-connects and, in some cases, access to public Internet exchange platforms and cloud platforms. Competition is increasing, however, and competitors are starting the long process of creating network-dense sites. At the same time, these sites are valuable and are being acquired, so the sector is consolidating. Having facili- ties in multiple markets does seem to provide some competitive advantage, particularly if the facilities are similar in look and feel and customers can monitor them all from a single portal and have them on the same contract. Mobility, the Internet of Things, services such as SaaS and IaaS (cloud), and content delivery all depend on net- work performance. In many cases, a key way to improve network performance is to push content, processing and peering closer to the edge of the Internet. This is likely to drive demand for facilities in smaller markets that offer interconnection options. We also see these trends continuing to drive demand for interconnection facilities in the larger markets as well. © 2015 451 RESEARCH, LLC AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. -
DTC Participant Alphabetical Listing June 2019.Xlsx
DTC PARTICPANT REPORT (Alphabetical Sort ) Month Ending - June 30, 2019 PARTICIPANT ACCOUNT NAME NUMBER ABN AMRO CLEARING CHICAGO LLC 0695 ABN AMRO SECURITIES (USA) LLC 0349 ABN AMRO SECURITIES (USA) LLC/A/C#2 7571 ABN AMRO SECURITIES (USA) LLC/REPO 7590 ABN AMRO SECURITIES (USA) LLC/ABN AMRO BANK NV REPO 7591 ALPINE SECURITIES CORPORATION 8072 AMALGAMATED BANK 2352 AMALGAMATED BANK OF CHICAGO 2567 AMHERST PIERPONT SECURITIES LLC 0413 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT SERVICES INC. 0756 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT SERVICES INC./CONDUIT 7260 APEX CLEARING CORPORATION 0158 APEX CLEARING CORPORATION/APEX CLEARING STOCK LOAN 8308 ARCHIPELAGO SECURITIES, L.L.C. 0436 ARCOLA SECURITIES, INC. 0166 ASCENSUS TRUST COMPANY 2563 ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A. 2257 ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A./ASSOCIATED TRUST COMPANY/IPA 1620 B. RILEY FBR, INC 9186 BANCA IMI SECURITIES CORP. 0136 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 2236 BANK OF AMERICA, NA/GWIM TRUST OPERATIONS 0955 BANK OF AMERICA/LASALLE BANK NA/IPA, DTC #1581 1581 BANK OF AMERICA NA/CLIENT ASSETS 2251 BANK OF CHINA, NEW YORK BRANCH 2555 BANK OF CHINA NEW YORK BRANCH/CLIENT CUSTODY 2656 BANK OF MONTREAL, CHICAGO BRANCH 2309 BANKERS' BANK 2557 BARCLAYS BANK PLC NEW YORK BRANCH 7263 BARCLAYS BANK PLC NEW YORK BRANCH/BARCLAYS BANK PLC-LNBR 8455 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC. 5101 BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC./LE 0229 BB&T SECURITIES, LLC 0702 BBVA SECURITIES INC. 2786 BETHESDA SECURITIES, LLC 8860 # DTCC Confidential (Yellow) DTC PARTICPANT REPORT (Alphabetical Sort ) Month Ending - June 30, 2019 PARTICIPANT ACCOUNT NAME NUMBER BGC FINANCIAL, L.P. 0537 BGC FINANCIAL L.P./BGC BROKERS L.P. 5271 BLOOMBERG TRADEBOOK LLC 7001 BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP. -
Executive Report
Executive Report Using the CyrusOne IX for Active-Active, Active-Passive and Active-DR Interconnection A better use of time and money is to use large Web-scale carrier-neutral data centers containing the resiliency required for power, cooling, seismic stability, and most importantly, connectivity. Establishing the Right DR Strategy Most enterprises today are required to operate at least a simple disaster recovery (DR) data center strategy to maintain business continuity due to regulations and other factors Single consolidated including uptime resiliency. Compliance, regulations and due diligence often necessitate data center the active synching of IT environments to each other (active-active) or asymmetrical • With all of the eggs in one basket, synching to each other (active-passive). harden the basket. These enhanced DR strategies require highly connected data centers within specific latency parameters, and also require careful site selection. Factors for site selection include power-grid resiliency (there are three grids in North America: East, West and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)), seismic mitigation and network availability. These three factors can create a daunting task for an enterprise, especially when needing to hire dedicated staff to select, build and operate these facilities. Two data centers Using in-place optical waves, multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) and Internet Protocol • Active – passive (IP) transit greatly reduces costs and removes the need for expensive telecom hardware • Active – active and the staff to operate that hardware. How a National IX Works The CyrusOne National Internet Exchange (IX) meets many requirements for connectivity by delivering carrier-class infrastructure to data centers. This neutral platform has dedicated high-speed multiple carrier waves and MPLS between sites already in place. -
SCHEDULE of INVESTMENTS MID-CAP 1.5X STRATEGY FUND
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2020 MID-CAP 1.5x STRATEGY FUND SHARES VALUE SHARES VALUE COMMON STOCKS† - 39.5% United Bankshares, Inc. 118 $ 3,823 Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 19 3,802 FINANCIAL - 9.3% Highwoods Properties, Inc. REIT 95 3,765 Medical Properties Trust, Inc. REIT 489 $ 10,655 RLI Corp. 36 3,749 Brown & Brown, Inc. 215 10,193 Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. REIT 215 3,687 Camden Property Trust REIT 89 8,893 Selective Insurance Group, Inc. 55 3,684 CyrusOne, Inc. REIT 110 8,047 Rayonier, Inc. REIT 125 3,673 Alleghany Corp. 13 7,848 Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. REIT 124 3,670 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 46 7,628 Valley National Bancorp 369 3,598 Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. REIT 207 7,518 Webster Financial Corp. 82 3,456 STORE Capital Corp. REIT 216 7,340 Bank OZK 110 3,440 Reinsurance Group of Physicians Realty Trust REIT 190 3,382 America, Inc. — Class A 62 7,186 PROG Holdings, Inc. 62 3,340 Eaton Vance Corp. 104 7,065 Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. REIT 139 3,339 Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.* 47 6,973 Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. 189 3,283 Signature Bank 49 6,629 Alliance Data Systems Corp. 44 3,260 Lamar Advertising Co. — Class A REIT 79 6,574 Wintrust Financial Corp. 53 3,238 East West Bancorp, Inc. 129 6,541 CIT Group, Inc. 90 3,231 National Retail Properties, Inc. REIT 159 6,506 JBG SMITH Properties REIT 102 3,190 First Horizon National Corp. 507 6,469 Sterling Bancorp 177 3,183 SEI Investments Co. -
4Q20 Baron Real Estate Fund Letter
December 31, 2020 Baron Real Estate Fund Dear Baron Real Estate Fund Shareholder: The Baron Real Estate Fund (the “Fund”) generated exceptionally strong performance in 2020, gaining 44.28% (Institutional Shares) for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Fund’s 44.28% gain in 2020 substantially outperformed both its primary benchmark index, the MSCI USA IMI Extended Real Estate Index (the “MSCI Real Estate Index”), that rose only 4.21%, and the MSCI US REIT Index, that declined by 8.70%. For the most recent three-month period ended December 31, 2020, the Baron Real Estate Fund increased 16.79%, exceeding the returns of 10.35% by the MSCI Real Estate Index and 11.16% by the MSCI US REIT Index. Baron Real Estate Fund Cumulative Return Since Inception (December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2020) • Baron Real Estate Fund: 446.66% • MSCI Real Estate Index: 239.73% • MSCI U.S. REIT Index: 149.50% JEFFREY KOLITCH Retail Shares: BREFX The Fund has received special recognition from Morningstar for its Institutional Shares: BREIX achievements: PORTFOLIO MANAGER R6 Shares: BREUX Morningstar Real Estate Category Ratings (as of December 31, 2020) • Morningstar Overall Rating™: • Morningstar 5-Year Ranking: - Baron Real Estate Fund received a 5-star Morningstar Overall - Baron Real Estate Fund ranked in the top 2% of all real estate Morningstar Rating™ funds • Morningstar 10-Year, 5-Year, 3-Year Ratings: We will address the following topics in this letter: - Baron Real Estate Fund received a 5-star Morningstar Rating™ for each of its full 10-year, 5-year, -
Fintech Monthly Market Update | July 2021
Fintech Monthly Market Update JULY 2021 EDITION Leading Independent Advisory Firm Houlihan Lokey is the trusted advisor to more top decision-makers than any other independent global investment bank. Corporate Finance Financial Restructuring Financial and Valuation Advisory 2020 M&A Advisory Rankings 2020 Global Distressed Debt & Bankruptcy 2001 to 2020 Global M&A Fairness All U.S. Transactions Restructuring Rankings Advisory Rankings Advisor Deals Advisor Deals Advisor Deals 1,500+ 1 Houlihan Lokey 210 1 Houlihan Lokey 106 1 Houlihan Lokey 956 2 JP Morgan 876 Employees 2 Goldman Sachs & Co 172 2 PJT Partners Inc 63 3 JP Morgan 132 3 Lazard 50 3 Duff & Phelps 802 4 Evercore Partners 126 4 Rothschild & Co 46 4 Morgan Stanley 599 23 5 Morgan Stanley 123 5 Moelis & Co 39 5 BofA Securities Inc 542 Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters). Announced Locations Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) or completed transactions. No. 1 U.S. M&A Advisor No. 1 Global Restructuring Advisor No. 1 Global M&A Fairness Opinion Advisor Over the Past 20 Years ~25% Top 5 Global M&A Advisor 1,400+ Transactions Completed Valued Employee-Owned at More Than $3.0 Trillion Collectively 1,000+ Annual Valuation Engagements Leading Capital Markets Advisor >$6 Billion Market Cap North America Europe and Middle East Asia-Pacific Atlanta Miami Amsterdam Madrid Beijing Sydney >$1 Billion Boston Minneapolis Dubai Milan Hong Kong Tokyo Annual Revenue Chicago New York Frankfurt Paris Singapore Dallas -
MRAC Minutes for December 11, 2019
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION’S MARKET RISK ADVISORY COMMITTEE December 11, 2019 The Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC or Committee) convened for a public meeting on December 11, 2019, at 9:30 a.m., at the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC or Commission) Headquarters Conference Center, located at Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC. The MRAC received reports from its subcommittees on Climate-Related Market Risk (CRMR), Market Structure, Central Counterparty (CCP) Risk and Governance (CCPRG), and Interest Rate Benchmark Reform (IRBR). Additionally, there would be a follow-up discussion on Central Counterparty Adjustments to Discounting/Price Alignment Interest Environment. The MRAC also discussed other issues involving the transition from the LIBOR to alternative risk-free reference rates (RFRs); including the recent consultation of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) on the final parameters for the spread and term adjustments that will apply to RFRs if derivatives fallbacks are triggered. MRAC Members in Attendance Nadia Zakir, MRAC Chair and Executive Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO) B. Salman Banaei, Executive Director, Global Head of Clearance and Settlement, IHS Markit Stephen Berger, Managing Director and Global Head of Government & Regulatory Policy, Citadel Dr. Richard Berner, Clinical Professor of Management Practice in Finance and Co-Director of the Stern Volatility -
Enforcing Federal Consumer Protection Laws
FACTSHEET Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Enforcing federal consumer protection laws The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in the wake of the financial meltdown to stand up for consumers and make sure they are treated fairly in the financial marketplace. Supervising financial companies and enforcing federal consumer protection laws is core to the Bureau carrying out its mission. Since opening its doors in 2011, the CFPB has held law breakers accountable and helped consumers harmed by illegal practices. CFPB enforcement and supervision by the numbers . $11.9 billion: Approximate amount of ordered relief to consumers from CFPB supervisory and enforcement work, including: Approximately $3.8 billion in monetary compensation ordered to be returned to consumers as a result of enforcement activity Approximately $7.7 billion in principal reductions, cancelled debts, and other consumer relief ordered as a result of enforcement activity $398 million in consumer relief as a result of supervisory activity . 29 million: Consumers who will receive relief as a result of CFPB supervisory and enforcement work . $600 million+: Money ordered to be paid in civil penalties as a result of CFPB enforcement work 1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU – JULY 2017 Supervising financial companies The CFPB supervises certain companies to assess their compliance with federal consumer financial laws, to identify risks to consumers, and to help ensure a fair and transparent marketplace for consumers. In addition to its authority over banks and credit unions with assets over $10 billion, and their affiliates, the CFPB is the first federal agency with supervisory authority over certain nonbank financial companies. These nonbanks include mortgage lenders and servicers, payday lenders, and private student lenders of all sizes, as well as larger participants in the debt collection, consumer reporting, auto finance, student loan servicing, and international money transmission markets. -
2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review
2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes 2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes This page intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary & Acknowledgements 4 Methodology 6 PART 1 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL VOTING RESULTS Figure 1 Corporate Governance Proposals Submitted – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 2 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 3 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Table) 8 Figure 4 Summary Average Voting Results for Selected Proposals – 2017 (Table) 9 Figure 5 Proposals Relating to Board Issues – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 6 Proposals Relating to Shareholder Rights – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 7 Proposals Relating to Proxy Access – 2016 and 2017 (Chart and Table) 11 Figure 8 Sponsorship of Corporate Governance Proposals – 2016 and 2017 (Table) 12 Figure 9 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Company – 2017 (Table) 13 Figure 10 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Proposal – 2017 (Table) 18 Figure 11 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Sponsor – 2017 (Table) 23 PART 2 – SELECTED SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS – ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE Figure 12 Shareholder Proposals – Board Diversity, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 13 Shareholder Proposals – Political Contributions, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 14 Shareholder Proposals – Gender Pay Gap, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 32 -
Spare the Air Employer Program Members
Spare the Air Employer Program Members 511 Affymetrix Inc. 1000 Journals Project Agilent Technologies ‐ Sonoma County 3Com Corporation Public Affairs 511 Contra Costa Agnews Developmental Center 511 Regional Rideshare Program AHDD Architecture 7‐Flags Car Wash Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. A&D Christopher Ranch Air Systems Inc. A9.com Akeena Solar AB & I Akira ABA Staffing, Inc. Akraya Inc. ABB Systems Control Alameda Co. Health Care for the Homeless Abgenix, Inc. Program ABM Industries, Inc Alameda County Waste Management Auth. Above Telecommunications, Inc. Alameda Free Library Absolute Center Alameda Hospital AC Transit Alameda Unified School District Academy of Art University Alder & Colvin Academy of Chinese Culture & Health Alexa Internet Acclaim Print & Copy Centers Allergy Medical Group Of S F A Accolo Alliance Credit Union Accretive Solutions Alliance Occupational Medicine ACF Components Allied Waste Services/Republic Services Acologix Inc. Allison & Partners ACRT, Inc Alta Bates/Summit Medical Center ACS State & Local Solutions Alter Eco Act Now Alter Eco Americas Acterra ALTRANS TMA, Inc Actify, Inc. Alum Rock Library Adaptive Planning Alza Corporation Addis Creson American Century Investment Adina for Life, Inc. American International (Group) Companies Adler & Colvin American Lithographers ADP ‐ Automatic Data Processing American Lung Association Advance Design Consultants, Inc. American Musical Theatre of San Jose Advance Health Center American President Lines Ltd Advance Orthopaedics Amgen, Inc Advanced Fibre Communications Amtrak Advanced Hyperbaric Recovery of Marin Amy’s Kitchen Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Ananda Skin Spa Advantage Sales & Marketing Anderson Zeigler Disharoon Gallagher & Advent Software, Inc Gray Aerofund Financial Svcs.,Inc. Anixter Inc. Affordable Housing Associates Anomaly Design Affymax Research Institute Anritsu Corporation Anshen + Allen, Architects BabyCenter.com Antenna Group Inc BACE Geotechnical Anza Library BackFlip APEX Wellness Bacon's Applied Biosystems BAE Systems Applied Materials, Inc. -
Virtu Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results
Virtu Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results Authorizes Additional $70 Million Share Repurchase NEW YORK, NY, February 11, 2021 - Virtu Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIRT), a leading provider of financial services and products that leverages cutting edge technology to deliver innovative, transparent trading solutions to its clients and liquidity to the global markets, today reported results for the fourth quarter ended and full year ended December 31, 2020. Fourth Quarter 2020: • Net income of $197.7 million; Normalized Adjusted Net Income1 of $234.0 million • Basic earnings per share of $0.89 and diluted earnings per share of $0.88; Normalized Adjusted EPS1 of $1.18 • Total revenues of $676.7 million; Trading income, net, of $505.5 million; Adjusted Net Trading Income1 of $455.9 million • Adjusted EBITDA1 of $343.9 million; Adjusted EBITDA Margin1 of 75.4% • Additional $70 million share repurchase authorized, bringing total to $170 million authorized; $50 million executed to date Full Year 2020: • Net income of $1,120.9 million; Normalized Adjusted Net Income1 of $1,135.1 million • Basic earnings per share of $5.19 and diluted earnings per share of $5.16; Normalized Adjusted EPS1 of $5.76 • Total revenues of $3,239.3 million; Trading income, net, of $2,493.2 million; Adjusted Net Trading Income1 of $2,271.4 million • Adjusted EBITDA1 of $1,648.0 million; Adjusted EBITDA Margin1 of 72.6% The Virtu Financial, Inc. Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share. This dividend is payable on March 15, 2021 to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2021.