GFP Q2 Investor Letter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

July 2019 Investor Letter REVIEW OF 2nd QUARTER PERFORMANCE RESEARCH SPOTLIGHT – SLM CORPORATION The Fund lagged the Financials sector benchmark Sallie Mae is an attractive stock at the current price. We and the overall market, but continues to understand the reasons Sallie Mae’s stock is cheap and think other outperform our benchmarks on a year-to-date investors should not be concerned about them. basis. The Fund gained 3.85% in the 2nd quarter. Dear Gator Financial Partner: We are providing you with Gator Financial Partners, LLC’s (the “Fund” or “GFP”) Q2 2019 investor letter. This letter reviews the Fund’s investment performance for the second quarter of 2019, discusses the current upside opportunity we see in our portfolio, analyses our investment in SLM Corp., and discusses the Fund’s current net exposure and positioning by sub-sector. 2nd QUARTER PERFORMANCE For the 2nd quarter of 2019, we lagged the Financials sector benchmark and the overall market, but we continue to outperform our benchmarks on a year-to-date basis. The Fund gained 3.85% in the second quarter. Fannie Mae preferred stock, Blackstone, Carlyle Group, and Ally Financial were top contributors to performance. The largest detractors were Kingstone Companies, Ambac, BBX Capital, and Barclays. We did not sell any positions of note. We added a new position in Goldman Sachs. We forwarded our investment thesis on Goldman to you in late June. Total Return Since Annualized Return Since Q2 2019 YTD 2019 Inception¹ Gator’s Inception¹ Gator Financial Partners, LLC² 3.85% 24.39% 760.95% 21.62% S&P 500 Total Return Index³ 4.30% 18.54% 190.84% 10.09% S&P 1500 Financials Index³ 7.84% 17.18% 120.17% 7.44% Source: Gator Capital Management & Bloomberg The Fund’s portfolio had a positive return in Q2. The private equity firms were strong during Q2. As we anticipated, Blackstone announced that it would convert from a publicly-traded partnership to a C Corporation as of July 1, 2019. The announcement of the C Corp conversion led to an increase in Blackstone’s stock price in anticipation of increased demand from an expanded universe of potential investors and likely demand from index funds as Blackstone’s shares are added to various stock market indicies. 1The Fund’s inception date was July 1, 2008. 2Performance presented assumes reinvestment of dividends, is net of fees, brokerage and other commissions, and other expenses an investor in the Fund would have paid. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please see General Disclaimer on page 10. 3Performance presented assumes reinvestment of dividends. No fees or other expenses have been deducted. Gator Financial Partners July 2019 Investor Letter Among the detractors during the quarter was our position in Kingstone Companies, which we wrote about in April 2017. Kingstone is a homeowner’s insurance company based in New York. We purchased the position as the company grew quickly on Long Island as State Farm and Allstate pulled back after Super Storm Sandy. Since then, Kingstone has continued to grow quickly and profitably. Recently, the company expanded into additional states in the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions. Earlier this year, the company added to its loss reserves after reviewing its claims. We think the stock has overreacted and represents a good value. CURRENT UPSIDE OPPORTUNITY We believe the stocks in our portfolio have significant upside. We are selective when we tell you in these letters that we feel strongly about the potential upside in the portfolio. The last time we made this statement was in our September 2016 letter in the section titled “Low Multiples within Portfolio.” While we did not predict how stocks in the Financials sector would respond to the 2016 election, we know “good things tend to happen to cheap stocks.” We have a similar view of the current environment. Even though the broader stock market averages are making record highs, we believe stocks in the Financials sector remain generally inexpensive, and stocks in our portfolio, in particular, are very attractively priced. The S&P 1500 Financials Index is still 5% below where it was 18 months ago. During this time, the companies have generally been growing earnings and using their excess capital to buyback shares. 1.) VALUE VS. GROWTH Growth stocks have been outperforming Value stocks since late 2016. If we compare the price-to-earnings ratio (“P/E ratio”) of the S&P 500 Growth Index to the P/E ratio of the S&P 500 Value Index, the disparity is currently at a level not seen since 2002. We believe in reversion to the mean and think we are at an unsustainable point. A reversion to the mean in the earnings multiple of Value stocks versus Growth stocks is not guaranteed. The big tech companies are great businesses with seemingly endless growth, business models with great economics, and strong competitive positions. However, we think at this point the low multiples on Value stocks are compressed enough to favor a near-term reversal. As you know, market participants divide the market between Value stocks and Growth stocks. As investors in the Financials sector, most of the sector is defined as Value stocks. For example, Financials stocks make up only about 3% of the Russell 1000 Growth Index, but they make up almost 24% of the Russell 1000 Value Index. 2.) FINANCIALS VS. MARKET Over time, the Financials sector has traded at 80% of the broader market’s price-to-earnings (“P/E”) multiple. Right now, the Financials sector trades at 68% of the broader market’s P/E multiple. The Financials sector would have to outperform the broader market by 18% to bring this ratio back to its historical average. 2 Gator Financial Partners July 2019 Investor Letter 3.) OUR INDIVIDUAL STOCK ARE INEXPENSIVE 56% of our portfolio has a P/E ratio of 10x or less. 13% of the portfolio holdings trade at less than 8x. As for the remainder of the portfolio, 21% trades below tangible book value and are asset plays rather than earnings stories. So, a full 77% of our portfolio trades below 10x earnings multiple or below tangible book value. The final 23% of our portfolio is composed of growth-at-a-reasonable price (“GARP”) companies which we do not believe are expensive by any measure. Price/Tangible 2021 Street EPS Ticker Symbol 2020 Price/Earning Book Growth Expectation ALLY 8.2 1.02 11% AMP 8.4 NA 10% This table shows the 77% of our portfolio that have P/E ratios below 10x CG 9.3 4.31 10% or price-to-tangible book (“P/TB”) ratios COWN 4.7 1.00 13% below 1x. As you can see, the Street CS 8.0 0.79 13% expects growth around 10% for these GS 8.8 1.08 7% companies in 2021, therefore we do not believe these firms are impaired or KINS 7.1 1.09 NA decaying businesses. We admit these MS 8.5 1.21 11% businesses are pro-cyclical, so their NMIH 9.5 2.50 17% 2021 earnings will depend on the OMF 5.9 2.02 9% economy two years from now. But, we believe these businesses will grow and SLM 7.2 1.65 14% maintain their market positions five and SYCRF NA 0.77 NA ten years from now. UBS 8.6 0.96 12% VCTR 4.8 NA 4% ZION 9.7 1.27 10% 4.) WE EXPECT CONTINUED ECONOMIC GROWTH One potential argument to justify the low valuations in our portfolio is the risk of a recession. We do not believe that we are poised to have a recession in the near term. Even if there was a pullback in economic growth, we believe the pause or downturn would be short and shallow. In the 2001-2002 recession, stocks in the Financials sector outperformed through the recession because the downturn was focused on the Technology sector rather than the Banking or Real Estate industries. We believe the bank regulators have kept close tabs on bank lending during this economic expansion, forcing banks to pause or retrench in several areas, such as apartment lending and leveraged lending. We do not see evidence of any area of the banking sector where overheated lending is an issue. We have mild concerns about peer-to-peer lending, private credit funds, and collateralized loan obligations, but for the most part, these loans are not made directly by the banking system. 3 Gator Financial Partners July 2019 Investor Letter 5.) THE UPCOMING RATE CUT COULD BE A CATALYST FOR THE FINANCIALS SECTOR In 1995, the Federal Reserve cut rates after deciding they had raised rates too far in 1994. Stocks in the Financials sector performed very well in the 1995-1997 period. One key similarity that we see between 1995 and the current environment was the Fed rate cut was a reversal of tightening too much in the prior cycle rather than cutting rates after a recession has already started. SLM CORPORATION SLM Corporation (“SLM” or “Sallie Mae”) is the holding company for Sallie Mae, the largest lender in the private student loan market. We have owned Sallie Mae for three years and wrote to you about it in our Q2 2016 letter when we reviewed our investment theses on several consumer finance stocks. We believe Sallie Mae is an attractive stock at the current price. We understand the reasons Sallie Mae’s stock is cheap and think other investors should not be concerned about them. Also, we believe the market is missing a free option in Sallie Mae if the federal government decides to end or privatize its Direct Student Loan program.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Online Trust Audit & Honor Roll Report

    2018 Online Trust Audit & Honor Roll Report

    Internet Society’s Online Trust Alliance (OTA) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview & Background .......................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary & Highlights ............................................................................................................. 4 Best Practices Highlights ......................................................................................................................... 9 Consumer Protection .......................................................................................................................... 9 Site Security ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Privacy Trends ................................................................................................................................... 10 Domain, Brand & Consumer Protection ................................................................................................. 12 Email Authentication ......................................................................................................................... 12 Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) ................................... 14 Opportunistic Transport Layer Security (TLS) for Email ...................................................................... 15 Domain Locking ................................................................................................................................
  • The Sallie Mae Saga: a Government-Created, Student Debt Fueled Profit Machine

    The Sallie Mae Saga: a Government-Created, Student Debt Fueled Profit Machine

    _Why The Sallie Mae Saga: A Government-Created, Student Debt Fueled Profit Machine January 2014 Deanne Loonin National Consumer Law Center® © Copyright 2014, National Consumer Law Center, Inc. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Deanne Loonin is an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) and the Director of NCLC’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project. Deanne assists attorneys representing low-income consumers, and teaches consumer law to legal services, private consumer attorneys, and other advocates. Deanne is the co-author of NCLC’s publications Student Loan Law and Guide to Surviving Debt as well as numerous reports on the student loan industry and borrower issues. Prior to joining NCLC in 1997, Deanne worked as a legal aid attorney in Los Angeles. She is a member of the California and Massachusetts bars. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a release of the National Consumer Law Center’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project. NCLC research assistant Marina Levy provided extensive research and editorial content. The author thanks NCLC colleagues Carolyn Carter, Jan Kruse, Robyn Smith and Persis Yu for valuable comments and assistance. We also thank NCLC colleague Beverlie Sopiep for layout assistance. The findings and conclusions presented in this report are those of the authors alone. NCLC’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project provides information about student loan rights and responsibilities for borrowers and advocates. We also seek to increase public understanding of student lending issues and to identify policy solutions to promote access to education, lessen student debt burdens, and make loan repayment more manageable. www.studentloanborrowerassistance.org ABOUT THE NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER Since 1969, the nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) has used its expertise in consumer law and energy policy to work for consumer justice and economic security for low- income and other disadvantaged people, including older adults, in the United States.
  • SCHEDULE of INVESTMENTS MID-CAP 1.5X STRATEGY FUND

    SCHEDULE of INVESTMENTS MID-CAP 1.5X STRATEGY FUND

    SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2020 MID-CAP 1.5x STRATEGY FUND SHARES VALUE SHARES VALUE COMMON STOCKS† - 39.5% United Bankshares, Inc. 118 $ 3,823 Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. 19 3,802 FINANCIAL - 9.3% Highwoods Properties, Inc. REIT 95 3,765 Medical Properties Trust, Inc. REIT 489 $ 10,655 RLI Corp. 36 3,749 Brown & Brown, Inc. 215 10,193 Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. REIT 215 3,687 Camden Property Trust REIT 89 8,893 Selective Insurance Group, Inc. 55 3,684 CyrusOne, Inc. REIT 110 8,047 Rayonier, Inc. REIT 125 3,673 Alleghany Corp. 13 7,848 Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. REIT 124 3,670 RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. 46 7,628 Valley National Bancorp 369 3,598 Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. REIT 207 7,518 Webster Financial Corp. 82 3,456 STORE Capital Corp. REIT 216 7,340 Bank OZK 110 3,440 Reinsurance Group of Physicians Realty Trust REIT 190 3,382 America, Inc. — Class A 62 7,186 PROG Holdings, Inc. 62 3,340 Eaton Vance Corp. 104 7,065 Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. REIT 139 3,339 Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.* 47 6,973 Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. 189 3,283 Signature Bank 49 6,629 Alliance Data Systems Corp. 44 3,260 Lamar Advertising Co. — Class A REIT 79 6,574 Wintrust Financial Corp. 53 3,238 East West Bancorp, Inc. 129 6,541 CIT Group, Inc. 90 3,231 National Retail Properties, Inc. REIT 159 6,506 JBG SMITH Properties REIT 102 3,190 First Horizon National Corp. 507 6,469 Sterling Bancorp 177 3,183 SEI Investments Co.
  • Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Their Implicit Federal Subsidy

    Government-Sponsored Enterprises and Their Implicit Federal Subsidy

    GovernmentSponsored Enterpriks and Their Implicit Federal Subsi*: The Case of Sallie Mae GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED ENTERPRISES AND THEIR IMPLICIT FEDERAL SUBSIDY: THE CASE OF SALLIE MAE The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office PREFACE This report on the Student Loan Marketing Association (Sallie Mae) is part of an ongoing study of government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). The Con- gressional Budget Office undertook the study at the request of the Senate Budget Committee and the Subcommittee on Federal Credit Programs of the Senate Banking Committee. Government-sponsored enterprises include, in addition to the Student Loan Marketing Association, the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Farm Credit Banks, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Home Loan Banks. Although the emphasis in this report is on Sallie Mae, the analysis is applicable to the other sponsored enterprises. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide ob- jective analysis, the paper offers no recommendations. This paper was prepared by Marvin Phaup of.the Budget Process Unit under the supervision of Richard P. Emery, Jr. A significant contribution to the study was made by Robert W. Hartman, Senior Analyst for Budget Pro- cess. Useful comments and suggestions were also made by Ron Boster, Jim Carr, Samuel Chase, Barry L. Cooper, Alfred B. Fitt, Ray Garea, Janet Hansen, Carol Hartwell, Timothy Howard, Ronald F. Hunt, Jan Lilja, Fred- erick C. Meltzer, Carl Mintz, William Schmidt, Robin Seiler, Kevin E. Villani, and Dan A. Woods. CBO analysts Deborah Kalcevic, Maureen McLaughlin, Roy Meyers, Mitchell Mutnick, Pearl Richardson, and Mark Weatherly also contributed to the paper.
  • PORTFOLIO of INVESTMENTS – As of September 30, 2020 (Unaudited)

    PORTFOLIO of INVESTMENTS – As of September 30, 2020 (Unaudited)

    PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS – as of September 30, 2020 (Unaudited) Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Principal ________________________________Amount Description ____________________________________________________________ Value (†) Bonds and Notes – 94.5% of Net Assets Non-Convertible Bonds – 93.6% ABS Car Loan – 6.4% $ 16,590,000 Ally Auto Receivables Trust, Series 2019-1, Class A3, 2.910%, 9/15/2023 $ 16,913,658 7,865,000 American Credit Acceptance Receivables Trust, Series 2019-3, Class D, 2.890%, 9/12/2025, 144A 8,047,444 1,965,000 AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2018-2, Class D, 4.010%, 7/18/2024 2,087,775 10,515,000 AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2018-3, Class D, 4.040%, 11/18/2024 11,116,717 25,880,000 AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2019-1, Class D, 3.620%, 3/18/2025 26,998,148 12,340,000 AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2019-2, Class D, 2.990%, 6/18/2025 12,984,709 1,395,000 AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust, Series 2020-2, Class D, 2.130%, 3/18/2026 1,413,280 4,800,000 Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP LLC, Series 2020-2A, Class A, 2.020%, 2/20/2027, 144A 4,841,880 3,650,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust, Series 2018-3, Class D, 3.910%, 1/15/2025 3,759,026 13,585,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust, Series 2019-1, Class D, 4.040%, 8/15/2025(a)(b) 13,970,250 5,811,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust, Series 2019-2, Class D, 3.410%, 10/15/2025 5,945,447 2,315,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust, Series 2019-3, Class D, 2.850%, 1/15/2026 2,393,670 4,625,000 CarMax Auto Owner
  • Fedwire Securities Service

    Fedwire Securities Service

    Federal Reserve Banks Fedwire Securities Service Issuer Guide V1.1 Last Updated - August 2021 Fedwire is a registered service mark of the Federal Reserve Banks 1 African Development Bank 6 Avenue Joseph Anoma, Plateau http://www.afdb.org/ 01 BP 1387 [email protected] Abidjan 01 (225) 20.20.44.44 Côte d‘Ivoire The African Development Bank (AFDB) is a multilateral development bank established in 1963 to encourage sustainable economic growth and reduce poverty in Africa. Regional members include any African country that has the status of an independent state. Non- regional countries that are participants in, or contributing to, the African Development Fund, a separate legal entity administered by the African Development Bank to provide loan financing to regional member countries, may be admitted as non-regional member countries. The United States became a non-regional member of the African Development Bank in 1983 pursuant to the African Development Bank Act. Class Product Interest Minimum Multiple Record Date Payment Date Corresponding Code Description Payment Clearing Memo AFDB Bond Semi-annually $1,000 $1,000 Varies Varies 250 AFNT Note Semi-annually $100,000 $1,000 TBD TBD 250 2 Asian Development Bank 815 Connecticut Street, NW http://www.adb.org/ Washington, DC 20006 (202) 728-1500 The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is a multilateral development bank established in 1966 to promote economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration to reduce poverty in Asia and the Pacific region. The Asian Development Bank is owned by its 67 members, including regional and non-regional members. The United States became a member in 1966.
  • Private Equity in the 2000S 1 Private Equity in the 2000S

    Private Equity in the 2000S 1 Private Equity in the 2000S

    Private equity in the 2000s 1 Private equity in the 2000s Private equity in the 2000s relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although interrelated tracks. The development of the private equity and venture capital asset classes has occurred through a series of boom and bust cycles since the middle of the 20th century. As the 20th century ended, so, too, did the dot-com bubble and the tremendous growth in venture capital that had marked the previous five years. In the wake of the collapse of the dot-com bubble, a new "Golden Age" of private equity ensued, as leveraged buyouts reach unparalleled size and the private equity firms achieved new levels of scale and institutionalization, exemplified by the initial public offering of the Blackstone Group in 2007. Bursting the Internet Bubble and the private equity crash (2000–2003) The Nasdaq crash and technology slump that started in March 2000 shook virtually the entire venture capital industry as valuations for startup technology companies collapsed. Over the next two years, many venture firms had been forced to write-off large proportions of their investments and many funds were significantly "under water" (the values of the fund's investments were below the amount of capital invested). Venture capital investors sought to reduce size of commitments they had made to venture capital funds and in numerous instances, investors sought to unload existing commitments for cents on the dollar in the secondary market.
  • Enforcing Federal Consumer Protection Laws

    Enforcing Federal Consumer Protection Laws

    FACTSHEET Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Enforcing federal consumer protection laws The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) was created in the wake of the financial meltdown to stand up for consumers and make sure they are treated fairly in the financial marketplace. Supervising financial companies and enforcing federal consumer protection laws is core to the Bureau carrying out its mission. Since opening its doors in 2011, the CFPB has held law breakers accountable and helped consumers harmed by illegal practices. CFPB enforcement and supervision by the numbers . $11.9 billion: Approximate amount of ordered relief to consumers from CFPB supervisory and enforcement work, including: Approximately $3.8 billion in monetary compensation ordered to be returned to consumers as a result of enforcement activity Approximately $7.7 billion in principal reductions, cancelled debts, and other consumer relief ordered as a result of enforcement activity $398 million in consumer relief as a result of supervisory activity . 29 million: Consumers who will receive relief as a result of CFPB supervisory and enforcement work . $600 million+: Money ordered to be paid in civil penalties as a result of CFPB enforcement work 1 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU – JULY 2017 Supervising financial companies The CFPB supervises certain companies to assess their compliance with federal consumer financial laws, to identify risks to consumers, and to help ensure a fair and transparent marketplace for consumers. In addition to its authority over banks and credit unions with assets over $10 billion, and their affiliates, the CFPB is the first federal agency with supervisory authority over certain nonbank financial companies. These nonbanks include mortgage lenders and servicers, payday lenders, and private student lenders of all sizes, as well as larger participants in the debt collection, consumer reporting, auto finance, student loan servicing, and international money transmission markets.
  • 2017 Annual Corporate  Governance Review

    2017 Annual Corporate  Governance Review

    2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes 2017 Annual Corporate Governance Review > Annual Meetings > Shareholder Proposals > Say-on-Pay Votes This page intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary & Acknowledgements 4 Methodology 6 PART 1 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL VOTING RESULTS Figure 1 Corporate Governance Proposals Submitted – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 2 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Chart) 8 Figure 3 Corporate Governance Proposals Voted On – 2013 to 2017 (Table) 8 Figure 4 Summary Average Voting Results for Selected Proposals – 2017 (Table) 9 Figure 5 Proposals Relating to Board Issues – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 6 Proposals Relating to Shareholder Rights – 2013 to 2017 (Chart and Table) 10 Figure 7 Proposals Relating to Proxy Access – 2016 and 2017 (Chart and Table) 11 Figure 8 Sponsorship of Corporate Governance Proposals – 2016 and 2017 (Table) 12 Figure 9 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Company – 2017 (Table) 13 Figure 10 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Proposal – 2017 (Table) 18 Figure 11 Shareholder Proposal Voting Results Sorted by Sponsor – 2017 (Table) 23 PART 2 – SELECTED SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS – ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE Figure 12 Shareholder Proposals – Board Diversity, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 13 Shareholder Proposals – Political Contributions, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 30 Figure 14 Shareholder Proposals – Gender Pay Gap, Voting Results – 2017 (Table) 32
  • CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2021 CEI 2021 Table of Contents

    CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2021 CEI 2021 Table of Contents

    Rating Corporate Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Equality Transgender and Queer Index 2021 Equality NEWS CEI 2021 Corporate Equality Index © 2021 by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation owns all right, title and interest in and to this publication and all derivative works thereof. Permission for reproduction and redistribution is granted if the publication is (1) reproduced in its entirety and (2) distributed free of charge. The Human Rights Campaign name and the Equality logo are trademarks of the Human Rights Campaign. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation and design incorporating the Equality logo are trademarks of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. ISBN-13 978-1-934765-58-6 CORPORATE EQUALITY INDEX 2021 CEI 2021 Table of Contents Rating Workplaces Corporate on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Equality Transgender and Queer Index 2021 Equality 2 Message from the HRC Foundation President NEWS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Key Findings 7 Equality at the Fortune-Ranked Companies 8 Accelerating Global Equality 10 Spotlight: HRC’s Equidad Programs 13 FINDINGS 14 Criteria 1: Workforce Protections 16 Criteria 2: Inclusive Benefits 17 Continued Need for Partner Benefits 18 Understanding Transgender-Inclusive Healthcare Coverage 19 Criteria 3: Supporting an Inclusive Culture & Corporate Social Responsibility 19 Internal Education and Training Best Practices 20 LGBTQ Employee Resource Group or Diversity Council 22 Outreach or Engagement with the LGBTQ Community 24 Corporate Social Responsibility 25 Spotlight: Equality
  • Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Massmutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund Name Was Massmutual Premier Core Bond Fund

    Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Massmutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund Name Was Massmutual Premier Core Bond Fund

    Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 MassMutual Core Bond Fund Barings Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund name was MassMutual Premier Core Bond Fund. Fund Weighting Security Name % Position Market Value USTREAS T-Bill Auction Ave 3 Mon 12.74 195,233,310 Us 2yr Note (Cbt) Sep21 Xcbt 20210930 10.04 153,783,578 Us Ultra Bond Cbt Sep21 Xcbt 20210921 3.37 51,640,250 Federal National Mortgage Association 3% 2.80 42,905,303 United States Treasury Bonds 3.5% 2.11 32,271,048 United States Treasury Bonds 2.25% 1.58 24,149,075 Federal National Mortgage Association 2% 1.39 21,330,781 Government National Mortgage Association 3.5% 1.29 19,783,269 United States Treasury Notes 0.5% 1.14 17,538,543 Us 5yr Note (Cbt) Sep21 Xcbt 20210930 1.12 17,156,727 Federal National Mortgage Association 2% 1.06 16,297,232 Federal National Mortgage Association 3.5% 1.06 16,265,953 BGME TRUST 2021-VR 2.99% 1.06 16,166,916 United States Treasury Notes 0.12% 0.97 14,904,792 Fnma Pass-Thru I 3.5% 0.76 11,608,875 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 2% 0.73 11,214,546 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3.5% 0.67 10,299,581 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.67 10,215,474 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.66 10,043,755 Government National Mortgage Association 3% 0.58 8,946,807 Government National Mortgage Association 2.5% 0.49 7,454,812 AT&T Inc 3.55% 0.44 6,810,636 JBS Finance Luxembourg S A R L 3.62% 0.43 6,547,970 Federal National Mortgage Association 3.5% 0.40 6,109,087 Government National Mortgage Association 3.5% 0.39 5,908,132 Government National Mortgage
  • Matching Gift Companies American Express Company American International Group, Inc

    Matching Gift Companies American Express Company American International Group, Inc

    Matching Gift Companies American Express Company American International Group, Inc. Matching Gifts are a vital part of our fundraising efforts. You can increase your contribution to American Nuclear Insurers ASH if your company has a Matching Gifts American Ref-Fuel Company Program. If your company is listed below American Trading and please contact your personnel office to obtain a Production Corporation matching gift form and return it with your Ameriprise Financial, Inc contribution, or contact the Development AmerUs Group Company Office at 504-269-1210 Amgen, Inc. Amica Companies Thank you for your support! AmSouth BanCorp Foundation Anadarko Petroleum Corporation List of Participating Companies Anchor Brewing Co. A & E Television Networks Anchor Capital Advisors, LLC Abbott Laboratories Anchor Russell Capital Abell-Hanger Foundation Advisors, Inc. Aboda, Inc. Andersons, Inc., The Acco Brands Corporation Andrew Corporation ACE Group Anheuser- Busch Acxiom Corporation Apache Corporation Adaptec Inc APC - MGE (American Power Conversion) ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Applera Corporation Administaff, Inc. Arch Chemicals Inc. Adobe Systems, Inc. Archer-Daniels Midland Advanced Financial Services, Inc. Argonaut Group, Inc. Advanced Micro Devices Arkwright Foundation Advanta Corp. Armstrong World Industries Advisor Technologies Art Technology Group, Inc. AES Corporation, The Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Aetna, Inc. Aspect Software, Inc. AIG Assent LLC Air Liquide USA LLC Assurant Employee Benefits AK Steel Holding Corporation Assurant Health Albemarle Corporation Assurant, Inc. Alliant Energy Corporation AT&T Alliant Energy Corporation (retirees) Autodesk, Inc. Alliant Techsystems, Inc. Autoliv North America Allianz Global Risks US Autozone Insurance Company Automatic Data Processing, Inc. Allied World Assurance (U.S.) Inc Aviva USA Altria Group, Inc.