DOCSLIB.ORG

Ciljni Raziskovalni Projekt Jezikovna Politika Republike Slovenije in Potrebe Uporabnikov (Raziskovalno Poročilo)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ciljni Raziskovalni Projekt Jezikovna Politika Republike Slovenije in Potrebe Uporabnikov (Raziskovalno Poročilo) ZRC SAZU Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša Geografski inštitut Antona Melika Inštitut za slovensko izseljenstvo in migracije Univerza v Ljubljani Akademija za radio, gledališče, film in televizijo Filozofska fakulteta Fakulteta za upravo Univerza v Mariboru Filozofska fakulteta Pravna fakulteta Inštitut za narodnostna vprašanja Pedagoški inštitut Alpineon Amebis Zveza gluhih in naglušnih Slovenije v sodelovanju z Zvezo Sožitje in Univerzo v Novi Gorici Ciljni raziskovalni projekt Jezikovna politika Republike Slovenije in potrebe uporabnikov (raziskovalno poročilo) Kozma Ahačič, Romana Bešter, Helena Dobrovoljc, Marjeta Doupona, Nataša Gliha Komac, Janja Hojnik, Damjan Huber, Živa Jakšić Ivačič, Marko Jesenšek, Matjaž Juhart, Damjana Kogovšek, Polonca Kovač, Jani Kozina, Simona Kranjc, Erika Kržišnik, Nina Ledinek, Tina Lengar Verovnik, Mojca Lipec Stopar, Mojca Medvešek, Tanja Mirtič, Katalin Munda Hirnök, Mojca Nidorfer Šiškovič, Sonja Novak Lukanovič, Matic Pavlič, Katarina Podbevšek, Mojca Poznanovič, Miro Romih, Vera Smole, Mojca Smolej, Marko Snoj, Mojca Šorli, Saška Štumberger, Hotimir Tivadar, Katja Vadnal, Marijanca Ajša Vižintin, Jerca Vogel, Alojzija Zupan Sosič, Đurđa Strsoglavec, Igor Ž. Žagar, Mitja Žagar, Nina Žavbi Milojević, Andreja Žele, Jerneja Žganec Gros, Ingrid Žolgar Jerković Uredila: Nataša Gliha Komac Vodja projekta: Kozma Ahačič Tehnična podpora: Duša Race Ljubljana, oktober 2017 Besedilo je bilo pripravljeno z vnašalnim sistemom ZRCola (http://zrcola.zrc-sazu.si), ki ga je na Znanstvenoraziskovalnem centru SAZU v Ljubljani (http://www.zrc-sazu.si) razvil Peter Weiss. 2 KAZALO Uvod ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Ocena stanja po področjih: pravni in sociolingvistični okvir ter smernice .............................. 13 I SPLOŠNI OPIS – JAVNA RABA SLOVENSKEGA JEZIKA V REPUBLIKI SLOVENIJI .......................................................................................................................... 14 1 Javna uprava .................................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Cilj 1 ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Cilj 2 ....................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Cilj 3 ....................................................................................................................... 16 2 Pravosodje ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Cilj .......................................................................................................................... 17 3 Gospodarstvo ................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 Cilj .......................................................................................................................... 18 4 Jezikovna krajina ........................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Cilj 1 ....................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Cilj 2 ....................................................................................................................... 21 5 Javno govorno izražanje: radio, televizija in gledališče ................................................ 21 5.1 Splošno ................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.1 Cilj ................................................................................................................... 22 5.2 Gledališče ............................................................................................................... 22 5.2.1 Cilj ................................................................................................................... 22 6 Osnovno- in srednješolska vzgoja in izobraževanje ..................................................... 24 6.1 Odnos do jezika ...................................................................................................... 24 6.1.1 Cilji .................................................................................................................. 24 6.2 Razmerje med knjižnimi in jezikovnimi vsebinami v osnovni in srednji šoli ....... 25 6.2.1 Cilj ................................................................................................................... 25 6.3 Pouk drugega tujega jezika v osnovnih šolah ........................................................ 25 6.3.1 Cilj ................................................................................................................... 26 7 Znanost, visoko šolstvo in raziskovanje ........................................................................ 27 7.1 Slovenski knjižni jezik – vloga in opredelitev ....................................................... 27 7.1.1 Cilji .................................................................................................................. 27 7.2 Visoko šolstvo in raziskovanje ............................................................................... 28 7.2.1 Cilj 1 ................................................................................................................ 30 7.2.2 Cilj 2 ................................................................................................................ 30 7.3 Znanost in raziskovanje .......................................................................................... 31 7.3.1 Cilji .................................................................................................................. 32 3 8 Literarno ustvarjanje in poustvarjanje ........................................................................... 32 8.1 Splošno ................................................................................................................... 32 8.1.1 Cilj 1 ................................................................................................................ 33 8.1.2 Cilj 2 ................................................................................................................ 33 8.2 Literarno poustvarjanje .......................................................................................... 33 8.2.1 Cilj 1 ................................................................................................................ 34 8.2.2 Cilj 2 ................................................................................................................ 34 II OPIS PO IZPOSTAVLJENIH PODROČJIH ................................................................... 35 1. Drugi jeziki v Republiki Sloveniji ............................................................................... 35 1.1 Italijanski in madžarski jezik .................................................................................. 35 1.1.1 Raba italijanskega jezika v Republiki Sloveniji .............................................. 36 1.1.1.1 Cilj 1 ......................................................................................................... 36 1.1.1.2 Cilj 2 ......................................................................................................... 37 1.1.1.3 Cilj 3 ......................................................................................................... 37 1.1.1.4 Cilj 4 ......................................................................................................... 38 1.1.2 Raba madžarskega jezika v Republiki Sloveniji ............................................. 39 1.1.2.1 Cilj 1 ......................................................................................................... 39 1.1.2.2 Cilj 2 ......................................................................................................... 40 1.1.2.3 Cilj 3 ......................................................................................................... 40 1.1.2.4 Cilj 4 ......................................................................................................... 41 1.2 Romski jezik ........................................................................................................... 41 1.2.1 Raba romskega jezika v Republiki Sloveniji .................................................. 42 1.2.1.1 Cilj 1 ......................................................................................................... 42 1.2.1.2 Cilj 2 ......................................................................................................... 42 1.2.1.3 Cilj 3 ......................................................................................................... 43 1.2.1.4 Cilj 4 ......................................................................................................... 43 1.2.1.5 Cilj 5 ......................................................................................................... 44 1.2.1.6 Cilj 6 ......................................................................................................... 44 1.3 Slovenski znakovni jezik ........................................................................................ 45 1.3.1 Cilj ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenske Akademije Znanosti in Umetnosti
    SLOVENSKE AKADEMIJE ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI 66. KNJIGA 2015 LJUBLJANA 2016 ISSN 0374-0315 LETOPIS SLOVENSKE AKADEMIJE ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI 66/2015 THE YEARBOOK OF THE SLOVENIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS VOLUME 66/2015 ANNALES ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM ET ARTIUM SLOVENICAE LIBER LXVI (2015) SLOVENSKE AKADEMIJE ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI 66. KNJIGA 2015 THE YEARBOOK OF THE SLOVENIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS VOLUME 66/2015 LJUBLJANA 2016 SPREJETO NA SEJI PREDSEDSTVA SLOVENSKE AKADEMIJE ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI DNE 23. FEBRUARJA 2016 Naslov - Address SLOVENSKA AKADEMIJA ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI SI-1000 LJUBLJANA, Novi trg 3, p.p. 323, telefon (01) 470-61-00, faks (01) 425-34-23, elektronska pošta: [email protected] spletna stran: www.sazu.si VSEBINA / CONTENTS I ORGANIZACIJA SAZU/ SASA ORGANIZATION .............................................................9 Skupščina, redni, izredni, dopisni člani / SASA Assembly, Full Members, Associate Members and Corresponding Members ................................... 11 II POROČILO O DELU SAZU / REPORT ON THE WORK OF SASA ..............................19 Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti v letu 2015 .....................................................21 The Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts in the year 2015 .........................................27 Delo skupščine ............................................................................................................................35 I. Razred za zgodovinske in družbene vede ..............................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenski Lingvistični Atlas 2
    Zbirka Jezikovni atlasi ISSN 2232-5255 Urednica zbirke Jožica Škofic Slovenski lingvistični atlas 2 Kmetija 2 Komentarji (= SLA 2.2) Spletno mesto www.fran.si Avtorji Jožica Škofic (vodja projekta), Januška Gostenčnik, Vito Hazler, Mojca Horvat, Tjaša Jakop, Janoš Ježovnik, Karmen Kenda-Jež, Vlado Nartnik, Vera Smole, Matej Šekli, Danila Zuljan Kumar Skice Urša Kogelnik Uredila Jožica Škofic, Matej Šekli Recenzirala Irena Stramljič Breznik, Marko Snoj Izdal Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša ZRC SAZU Zanj Marko Snoj Založila Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU Zanjo Oto Luthar Glavni urednik založbe Aleš Pogačnik Podlaga na naslovnici Tine Logar, zapis govora vasi Horjul (SLA T176), 1946, arhiv Dialektološke sekcije ISJ FR Oblikovanje naslovnice Brane Vidmar Prelom Syncomp, d. o. o. Tisk Collegium Graphicum, d. o. o. Naklada 400 Prva izdaja, prvi natis Ljubljana 2016 Izid knjige so podprli Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti (SAZU) in Javna agencija za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije (ARRS) s sredstvi iz leta 2015 Besedilo je bilo pripravljeno z vnašalnim sistemom ZRCola (ZRCola.zrc-sazu.si), ki ga je na Znanstveno razisko - valnem centru SAZU v Ljubljani (www.zrc-sazu.si) razvil Peter Weiss. Knjiga je prosto dostopna tudi v elektronski obliki (pdf) na spletni strani Dialektološke sekcije ISJFR ZRC SAZU (http: //sla.zrc-sazu.si) in kot html na portalu www.fran.si. CIP – Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 811.163.6'282(084.4) 912.44(497.4):811 SLOVENSKI lingvistični atlas. 2, Kmetija [Kartografsko gradivo] / avtorji Jožica Škofic … [et al.] ; uredila Jožica Škofic, Matej Šekli. – 1. izd., 1. natis. – Ljubljana : Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Marc L. Greenberg Dept. of Slavic Languages & Literatures University of Kansas (785) 864-2349 (voice) Wescoe Hall (785) 864-4298 (fax) 1445 Jayhawk Blvd., Room 2133 [email protected] Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7594, USA Present position: Chair, Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures; Professor of Slavic Languages & Literatures; Professor of Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies, University of Kansas (KU); Courtesy Professor of Linguistics; European Studies Program (Core Faculty Member) Education PhD: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1990, UCLA. Thesis: A Historical Analysis of the Phonology and Accentua- tion of the Prekmurje Dialect of Slovene; Co-Chairs: Henrik Birnbaum, Alan Timberlake. MA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1984, University of Chicago BA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1983, UCLA; Magna cum Laude (For details of study abroad in former USSR, former Yugoslavia, Hungary and former Czechoslovakia, see below under Foreign experience.) Employment, positions, rank 2012– Chair, Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures, KU 2012 Acting Associate Dean, Humanities, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, (6-mo. appt.) 2001– Full Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 2000–11 Department Chair, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures 1995– Associate Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 2001 1990–95 Assistant Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; Russian and East European Studies, KU 1990 Slovene language instructor, intensive 1st year course, Summer Workshop in East European Lan- guages, Indiana U., Bloomington 1986–87 Russian language graduate teaching assistant, 2nd year Russian, UCLA; 1st and 2nd year Russian, Self-paced (individualized) program, UCLA Honors/Awards 2004 Award for Outstanding Achievement in the field of Slovene Studies, Slavic Studies Society of Slove- nia, Novo mesto, Slovenia, October 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc L. Greenberg
    Marc L. Greenberg School of Languages, Literatures & Cultures University of Kansas (785) 864-4803 (voice) Wescoe Hall (785) 864-4298 (fax) 1445 JayhawK Blvd., Room 2080 [email protected] Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7594, USA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8419-8779 Web page: https://sllc.ku.edu/marc-l-greenberg Blog: http://slavist-semistrunniK.blogspot.com/ KUScholarWorKs archive: https://goo.gl/Q88a9L LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marclgreenberg Twitter: https://twitter.com/marek4 WiKipedia: https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_L._Greenberg (in Slovene, Russian) Present position: Director, School of Languages, Literatures & Cultures; Professor of Slavic Lan- guages & Literatures; Professor of Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies, University of Kansas (KU); Courtesy Professor of Linguistics; European Studies Program (Core Faculty Mem- ber) Education PhD: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1990, UCLA. Thesis: A Historical Analysis of the Phonol- ogy and Accentuation of the Prekmurje Dialect of Slovene; Co-Chairs: HenriK Birnbaum, Alan Tim- berlake. MA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1984, University of Chicago BA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1983, UCLA; Magna cum Laude (For details of study abroad in former USSR, former Yugoslavia, Hungary and former Czecho- slovaKia, see below under International experience.) Employment, positions, rank 2014– Director, School of Languages, Literatures & Cultures, KU 2012–14 Chair, Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures, KU 2012 Acting Associate Dean, Humanities, College of Liberal Arts &
    [Show full text]
  • The Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language ZRC SAZU In
    The Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language ZRC SAZU in collaboration with the Department of Slovenian studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana invites you to Slovenian Dialectological Conference 3 (SDC 3) to be held in Prešernova Dvorana SAZU, Novi trg 4, Ljubljana 11–12 February 2016 Prof Marko Snoj, Associate Member of SAZU Head of the Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language ZRC SAZU The Dialectological Section of the Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language is delighted to invite you to a Slovenian dialectological conference to be held in Prešernova Dvorana SAZU, Novi trg 4, Ljubljana (the Institute’s building) from 11–12 February 2016. This third dialectological conference has been convened to mark the publication of the second volume of the Slovenian Linguistic Atlas (SLA 2.1 Atlas and SLA 2.2 Commentaries) and the 100th anniversary of the birth of Slovene dialectologist, our late mentor and professor Tine Logar and the 80th birthday of Slovene dialectologist, Professor Emeritus Zinka Zorko. Professor Logar was born on 11 February 1916 in Horjul, a small town in the Notranjska region of Slovenia. He graduated from the Ljubljana Faculty of Arts in 1940, and in 1941 he was awarded his PhD with a dissertation on the local dialect of Horjul. From 1947 to 1958 he worked as a dialectologist at the Fran Ramovš Institute of the Slovenian Language, afterwards working as a professor of the history of the Slovenian language and Slovenian dialectology at the Ljubljana Faculty of Arts until retirement. He was a member of Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SAZU) from 1992 and an Emeritus Professor at the University of Ljubljana from 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Review for the 12Th Slavic Linguistics Society Annual Meeting
    US-China Foreign Language, June 2018, Vol. 16, No. 6, 347-350 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2018.06.008 D DAVID PUBLISHING Review for the 12th Slavic Linguistics Society Annual Meeting Ivan G. Iliev Plovdiv University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria This is a critical review for the 12th Slavic Linguistics Society Annual Meeting held between the 21st and 24th of September 2017 in Ljubljana (Slovenia). The reviewer prooves with examples that the conference was not organized professionaly and the proceedings from it (in fact, containing only the abstracts of the articles) were not properly reviewed and published. As week points of the book of abstracts, he shows lack of bibliography, unclear abstracts without examples, technical mistakes, etc. Keywords: Slavic Linguistics Society (SLS), 12th SLS Annual Meeting, Ljubljana Of late, the Slavic Linguistics Society (SLS) has turned into an organization whose main goal is to collect money in the form of annual fees from the latter’s members, without allowing many of them to participate in the conferences held each year. The criterion for selecting the members allowed is unclear and is definitely not based on their professional qualities. Proof of that is the carelessly compiled and badly printed collection, reviewed here, of the conference of the SLS held between the 21st and 24th of September 2017 in Ljubljana (Slovenia), containing a huge amount of weak abstracts with insipid and imprecise titles. From them, in most cases, it does not even become clear what the articles deal with. Let alone the presence of illustrative examples which as a rule are lacking, and even less any scholarly contribution in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenski Jezik in Književnost V Srednjeevropskem Prostoru
    Slovenski slavistični kongres Gradec/Graz in Maribor 2020 Zbornik Slavističnega društva Slovenije 30 Slovenski jezik in književnost v srednjeevropskem prostoru Uredila Matej Šekli in Lidija Rezoničnik Zveza društev Slavistično društvo Slovenije Ljubljana 2020 Zbornik Slavističnega društva Slovenije 30 Slovenski slavistični kongres, Gradec/Graz in Maribor, 1.–3. oktober, 8.–9. oktober 2020 SlovenSki jezik in književnoSt v SrednjeevropSkem proStoru Urednika: Matej ŠEKLI, Lidija Rezoničnik Recenzenti: Agnieszka Będkowska-KOPCZYK, Aleš Bjelčevič, Milena Mileva Blažić, Helena doBRovoljc, Tanja FajFaR, Lara Godec soRšak, Lilijana F. Gustinčič, Nataša jakop, Miha javoRnik, Alenka jelovšek, Boris KERN, Tatjana KOREN, Boža kRakaR voGel, Erika kRžišnik, Andrej LEBEN, Andreja leGan RavnikaR, Tina lenGaR veRovnik, Špela petRic žižić, David PUC, Luka Repanšek, Juana RoBida, Špela sevšek šRaMel, Marko snoj, Irena stRaMljič BREZNIK, Matej ŠEKLI, Natalija ulčnik, Alojzija zupan sosič, Petra zupančič, Alenka žBoGaR, Andreja žele, Sonja žilavec NEMEC Tehnični urednik: Rok MRvič Izdala in založila Zveza društev Slavistično društvo Slovenije v Ljubljani oktobra 2020. To delo je ponujeno pod licenco: Creative Commons mednarodna licenca 4.0: priznanje avtorstva, deljenje pod enakimi pogoji. Prva e-izdaja. Publikacija je v PDF obliki brezplačno dostopna na spletni strani ZDSDS. Naslov: <https://zdsds.si/tiski/zborniki-slavisticnega-drustva-slovenije/>. Deli besedil so bili pripravljeni z vnašalnim sistemom ZRCola, ki ga je na Znanstveno­ raziskovalnem centru
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 1 Introduction „The increase in funds, the first such occurrence in a number of years, is a trend that needs to continue.” In 2016 the Slovenian Research Past year was the first since 2010 devoted to promoting science and to date on the consequences of Agency has spent (co-)financing when the financing of research via international cooperation, and the reduced resources, both financial research activities within the con- the Agency took a turn for the bet- Agency continued to play an active and human, for the operation of the firmed work programme, introduc- ter. Although the increased financ- role in the Science Europe associa- Agency and the research sector in ing a new instrument and further ing fell short of the amount required tion. general. The increase in funds, the improving operating conditions and to implement substantial changes, The Agency presents the results first such occurrence in a number of support for researchers. Time was the Agency was able to cover the of the standard bibliometric and years, is a trend that needs to con- also spent preparing for the start of assumed commitments that re- other quantitative indicators used tinue. The impact funding has on the application of the new Rules on sulted primarily from the increase globally to monitor research activ- indicators manifests itself over the the Procedures for Financing, Co-fi- in research projects. These limited ities in the chapter entitled Inter- long term; therefore, we cannot yet nancing, Evaluating and Monitoring funds notwithstanding, the Agency national comparisons. Note should properly assess the full implications the Implementation of Research participated in a European Research be made that the relative impact that the austerity measures enact- Activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fakulteta Za Podiplomski Študij
    Univerza v Novi Gorici Fakulteta za podiplomski študij Spremljanje, ugotavljanje in zagotavljanje kakovosti Poročilo za študijsko leto 2013/2014 November 2014 »Operacijo delno financira Evropska unija iz Evropskega socialnega sklada ter Ministrstvo za izobraževanje, znanost in šport. Operacija se izvaja v okviru Operativnega programa razvoja človeških virov za obdobje 2007-2013, razvojne prioritete 3: Razvoj človeških virov in vseživljenjskega učenja; prednostne usmeritve 3.3: Kakovost, konkurenčnost in odzivnost visokega šolstva.« GRADIVO UREDILA: dr. Martina Bergant Marušič Pri pripravi poročila so sodelovali (po abecednem vrstnem redu): prof. dr. Iztok Arčon, Marina Artico, doc. dr. Martina Bergant Marušič, Tanja Božič, prof. dr. Anton Brancelj, prof. dr. Saša Dobričič, prof. dr. Elsa Fabbretti, Kristien Fauconnier, doc. dr. Sandra Gardonio, prof. dr. Martin Knez, Teja Komel, Renata Kop, Nadja Lovec-Santaniello, doc. dr. Tanja Pipan, Tea Stibilj Nemec, prof. dr. Samo Stanič, prof. dr. Arthur Stepanov, doc. dr. Ana Toroš, Vanesa Valentinčič, Tiva Vlaj, Sabina Zelinšček. Dekan: Prof. dr. Iztok Arčon Zaključno poročilo o spremljanju in zagotavljanju kakovosti pedagoškega in raziskovalnega dela je obravnaval in sprejel Senat UNG na svoji redni 62 seji dne 14. 1. 2014. 2 Kazalo 1. PREDSTAVITEV FAKULTETE ZA PODIPLOMSKI ŠTUDIJ ........................... 5 2. STRATEGIJA, ORGANIZIRANOST IN VODENJE ZAVODA, UREJENOST EVIDENC TER SKRB ZA KAKOVOST .................................................... 9 2.1 ORGANIZIRANOST ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marc L. Greenberg
    Marc L. Greenberg School of Languages, Literatures & Cultures University of Kansas (785) 864-4803 (main office) Wescoe Hall (785) 864-9171 (voicemail) 1445 Jayhawk Blvd., Room 2080 [email protected] Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7594, USA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8419-8779 Web page: https://sllc.ku.edu/marc-l-greenberg Blog: http://slavist-semistrunnik.blogspot.com/ Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=m6EZq4IAAAAJ KUScholarWorks archive: https://goo.gl/Q88a9L LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marclgreenberg Twitter: https://twitter.com/marek4 Wikipedia: https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_L._Greenberg (in Slovene, Russian) Present position (University of Kansas): Director, School of Languages, Literatures & Cultures; Professor of Slavic Languages & Litera- tures; Professor of Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies; Courtesy Professor of Linguis- tics; European Studies Program (Core Faculty Member) Honorary Corresponding Member, Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SAZU), Ljubljana. Induction June 2017 Education PhD: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1990, UCLA. Thesis: A Historical Analysis of the Phonol- ogy and Accentuation of the Prekmurje Dialect of Slovene; Co-Chairs: Henrik Birnbaum, Alan Tim- berlake. MA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1984, University of Chicago BA: Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1983, UCLA; Magna cum Laude (For details of study abroad in former USSR, former Yugoslavia, Hungary and former Czecho- slovakia, see below under International experience.) Employment, positions, rank 2014– Director,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Iz recenzij: Monografija Frazeološka simfonija je delo, ki smo si ga na Slovenskem že dolgo želeli. Je simfonija v pravem pomenu besede, saj skladno in dopolnjujoče se niza Frazeološka vsa temeljna teoretična in aplikativna vprašanja frazeološkega raziskovanja. S pričujočim delom je mozaik frazeološkega raziskovanja na Slovenskem končno dobil celostno in smiselno povezano podobo, ki obenem odpira vrata nadaljnjim simfonija: frazeološkim, pa tudi drugim jezikoslovnim raziskavam. Mojca Smolej Sodobni pogledi Frazeološka simfonija je nabor nekaterih najnovejših pogledov na frazeologijo kot vse izzivalnejšo jezikoslovno vedo. Avtorji in avtorice teoretično in praktično osvetljujejo tisti pomembni delež besedišča, brez katerega bi bil jezik bled in suhoparen. Z znotrajjezikovnim razkrivanjem pomenskih in strukturnih na frazeologijo značilnosti odstirajo zakonitosti in tudi nepredvidljivosti bogate jezikovne metaforike oz. idiomatičnosti. Medjezikovne primerjave odslikavajo jezikovna in kulturna (kulturološka) ujemanja in razhajanja ter nakazujejo poti do prevodnih rešitev. Rojstvo slovenske Darko Čuden frazeologije Skrivnosti frazeološkega pomena Zidaki frazeološke Frazeološka simfonija: Sodobni pogledi na frazeologijo Frazeološka zgradbe Cena: 19 € Poti do frazeoloških ustreznikov http://zalozba.zrc-sazu.si Frazeološka simfonija: Sodobni pogledi na frazeologijo Uredili Nataša Jakop Mateja Jemec Tomazin Ljubljana 2013 Frazeološka simfonija: Sodobni pogledi na frazeologijo Avtorji Agnieszka Będkowska-Kopczyk, Natal’ja Bragina, Aleksandra Derganc,
    [Show full text]
  • Melioration in South Slavic. the Case of Slavic *Gyzd
    ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC WORK UDK 811.16'373 DOI: 10.33669/KJ2020-31-01 primljeno / received: 29. 8. 2020. MARC L. GREENBERG prihvaćeno / accepted: 16. 11. 2020. Department of Slavic and Eurasian Languages & Literatures University of Kansas 1445 Jayhawk Blvd. Lawrence, KS 66045-7590, USA [email protected] Melioration in South Slavic. The case of Slavic *gyzd- Abstract: The article discusses the origin and development of the Proto-Slavic word *gyzd-ъ/-a and its derivatives in the Slavic daughter languages with particular attention to the formal and semantic deve- lopments that help to explain why the word went from a negative meaning (‘mud, excrement’, ‘something disgusting’) in Northern Slavic (West and East) to a positive meaning (‘adornment, embellis- hment’, ‘showiness, suavity’) in South Slavic. Keywords: etymology, Proto-Slavic, word-formation, semantic change This text is licenced with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For details, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. 9 KNJIŽEVNI JEZIK 31, 2020. (9–23) Introduction This paper focus on the semantic development of PSl. *gyzd‑ъ/‑a and its derivatives in South Slavic, where the word has shifted in meaning from negative to positive.1 Details are added to the reconstruction to provide a richer account of the semantic development. The etymo- logy of the word is still open to some interpretation for at least the following reasons: (1) The full development of the word in Slavic has not yet been adequately explained, (2) the semantics of the word in West vs. South Slavic are strikingly opposite, raising questions of how the semantic reevaluation occurred, and (3) in relation to the previous notion, the distribution of the word is indicative of lexical relationships of Slavic dialects dating to the time of the disintegration of Common Slavic and presumed migrations (ca.
    [Show full text]