DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Progress Report 2018-2020 Brookhaven National Laboratory Cosmotron An Assessment of Historic Properties and Preservation Activities at the U.S. Department of Energy In response to The Ammunition Igloo at the National requirements of Renewable Energy Laboratory Executive Order 13287, Preserve America U.S. Department of Energy September 2020 Test Cell C at the Nevada National Security Site 0 Table of Contents Acronym List ............................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 8 Part I. Background and Overview ................................................................................................. 9 U.S. Department of Energy ...................................................................................................... 9 Departmental Assets .............................................................................................................. 9 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................12 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................14 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................15 Select Highlighted Successes and Opportunities.........................................................................17 Highlighted Challenges ...........................................................................................................19 Part II: Field Site Reports ............................................................................................................21 Argonne National Laboratory .....................................................................................................22 Introduction .........................................................................................................................22 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................23 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................24 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................24 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................24 Bonneville Power Administration ................................................................................................25 Introduction .........................................................................................................................25 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................27 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................30 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................31 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................32 Brookhaven National Laboratory.................................................................................................36 Introduction .........................................................................................................................36 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................38 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................40 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................40 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................41 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FERMILAB) .......................................................................42 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................42 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................42 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................43 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................43 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................44 Hanford Site.............................................................................................................................48 Introduction .........................................................................................................................48 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................50 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................51 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................52 Idaho National Laboratory Site ...................................................................................................54 Introduction .........................................................................................................................54 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................58 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................59 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................61 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................61 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory .......................................................................................63 Introduction .........................................................................................................................63 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................64 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................64 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................64 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................65 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ......................................................................................66 Introduction .........................................................................................................................66 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................66 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................67 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................67 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................68 Los Alamos National Laboratory..................................................................................................70 Introduction .........................................................................................................................70 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................71 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................72 2 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................74 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................75 National Energy Technology Laboratory .......................................................................................77 Introduction .........................................................................................................................77 Identifying Historic Properties .................................................................................................78 Protecting Historic Properties .................................................................................................79 Using Historic Properties ........................................................................................................82 Successes, Opportunities and Challenges ..................................................................................82
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silica-Rich Deposits and Hydrated Minerals at Gusev Crater, Mars: Vis-NIR Spectral Characterization and Regional Mapping
    Icarus 205 (2010) 375–395 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Silica-rich deposits and hydrated minerals at Gusev Crater, Mars: Vis-NIR spectral characterization and regional mapping M.S. Rice a,*, J.F. Bell III a, E.A. Cloutis b, A. Wang c, S.W. Ruff d, M.A. Craig e, D.T. Bailey b, J.R. Johnson f, P.A. de Souza Jr. g, W.H. Farrand h a Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA b Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, Man., Canada R3B 2E9 c Department of Earth and Planetary Science and McDonnell Center for Space Science, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA d School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA e Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. Louis, Ont., Canada N6A 5B7 f Astrogeology Team, United States Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA g Tasmanian ICT Center, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia h Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, CO 80301, USA article info abstract Article history: The Mars Exploration Rover (MER) Spirit has discovered surprisingly high concentrations of amorphous Received 7 January 2009 silica in soil and nodular outcrops in the Inner Basin of the Columbia Hills. In Pancam multispectral obser- Revised 24 March 2009 vations, we find that an absorption feature at the longest Pancam wavelength (1009 nm) appears to be Accepted 31 March 2009 characteristic of these silica-rich materials; however, spectral analyses of amorphous silica suggest that Available online 8 May 2009 the 1009 nm spectral feature is not a direct reflection of their silica-rich nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of an Atomic Bomb
    (Image: Courtesy of United States Government, public domain.) INTRODUCTORY ESSAY "DESTROYER OF WORLDS": THE MAKING OF AN ATOMIC BOMB At 5:29 a.m. (MST), the world’s first atomic bomb detonated in the New Mexican desert, releasing a level of destructive power unknown in the existence of humanity. Emitting as much energy as 21,000 tons of TNT and creating a fireball that measured roughly 2,000 feet in diameter, the first successful test of an atomic bomb, known as the Trinity Test, forever changed the history of the world. The road to Trinity may have begun before the start of World War II, but the war brought the creation of atomic weaponry to fruition. The harnessing of atomic energy may have come as a result of World War II, but it also helped bring the conflict to an end. How did humanity come to construct and wield such a devastating weapon? 1 | THE MANHATTAN PROJECT Models of Fat Man and Little Boy on display at the Bradbury Science Museum. (Image: Courtesy of Los Alamos National Laboratory.) WE WAITED UNTIL THE BLAST HAD PASSED, WALKED OUT OF THE SHELTER AND THEN IT WAS ENTIRELY SOLEMN. WE KNEW THE WORLD WOULD NOT BE THE SAME. A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHED, A FEW PEOPLE CRIED. MOST PEOPLE WERE SILENT. J. ROBERT OPPENHEIMER EARLY NUCLEAR RESEARCH GERMAN DISCOVERY OF FISSION Achieving the monumental goal of splitting the nucleus The 1930s saw further development in the field. Hungarian- of an atom, known as nuclear fission, came through the German physicist Leo Szilard conceived the possibility of self- development of scientific discoveries that stretched over several sustaining nuclear fission reactions, or a nuclear chain reaction, centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy
    Transforming the Relationship between Science and Society: The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy Report on the workshop funded by the National Science Foundation held on February 14 and 15, 2013 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Workshop 2 Two Motifs 4 Core Session Discussions 6 Scientific Responsibility 6 The Culture of Secrecy and the National Security State 9 The Decision to Drop the Bomb 13 Aftermath 15 Next Steps 18 Conclusion 21 Appendix: Participant List and Biographies 22 Copyright © 2013 by the Atomic Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this book, either text or illustration, may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, reporting, or by any information storage or retrieval system without written persmission from the publisher. Report prepared by Carla Borden. Design and layout by Alexandra Levy. Executive Summary The story of the Manhattan Project—the effort to develop and build the first atomic bomb—is epic, and it continues to unfold. The decision by the United States to use the bomb against Japan in August 1945 to end World War II is still being mythologized, argued, dissected, and researched. The moral responsibility of scientists, then and now, also has remained a live issue. Secrecy and security practices deemed necessary for the Manhattan Project have spread through the govern- ment, sometimes conflicting with notions of democracy. From the Manhattan Project, the scientific enterprise has grown enormously, to include research into the human genome, for example, and what became the Internet. Nuclear power plants provide needed electricity yet are controversial for many people.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Nuclear Weapon Program
    /.i. - y _-. --_- -. : _ - . i - DOE/ES4005 (Draft) I _ __ _ _ _____-. 67521 - __ __-. -- -- .-- THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR - %”WEAPQN PROGRA,hik ..I .La;*I* . , ASUMMARYHISTORY \ ;4 h : . ,‘f . March 1983 \ .;_ U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division -. DOE/ES4005 (Draft) THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WEAPON PROG.RAM: ASUMMARYHISTORY .' . c *. By: . Roger M. Anders Archivist With: Jack M. Hall Alice L. Buck Prentice C. Dean March 1983 ‘ .I \ . U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary, Management and Administration Office of The Executive Secretariat History Division Washington, D. C. 20585 ‘Thelkpaemlt of Energy OqanizationAct of 1977 b-mughttcgether for the first tim in one departxrmtrmst of the Federal GovenmTle?t’s - Programs-With these programs cam a score of organizational ‘ . ? entities,eachwithi+ccxmhistoryandtraditions,frmadozendepart- . .‘I w ’ mnts and independentagencies. The EIistoryDivision,- prepareda . seriesof paqhlets on The Institutional Originsof the De-t of v Eachpamphletexplainsthehistory,goals,and achievemzntsof a predecessoragency or a major prqrm of the -to=-TY* This parquet, which replacesF&ger M. Anders'previous booklet on "The Office of MilitaxxApplication," traces the histoe of the UrL+& Statesnuclearweapx prcgramfrmits inceptionduring World War II to the present. Nuclear weqons form the core of America's m&z defenses. Anders'history describes the truly fo&idable effortscf 5e Atanic Energy Cmmission, the F;nergy Rfzsearch and Develqmlt z4dmCstratian,andtheDep&m- to create adiverse a* sophistica~arsenzl ofnucleaz ~accctqli&mentsofL~se agenciesandtheirplants andlabc J zrsatedan "atanic shie2 WMchp- Psrrericatoday. r kger M. Anders is a trained historianworking in the Eistzq Divisbn.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Energy National Laboratories and Plants: Leadership in Cloud Computing (Brochure), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
    Department of Energy National Laboratories and Plants Leadership in Cloud Computing Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; NREL is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. JJJTABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE ........................................34 LABORATORIES AND PLANTS ......................................................4 Current State ...............................................................................34 Cloud Vision .................................................................................34 ABOUT THIS REPORT .....................................................................8 Key Initiatives ..............................................................................34 History of Computing ...............................................................9 Evolution of Computing Models ...........................................9 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY ....................................36 What is Cloud Computing? ....................................................9 Current State and Future Work ............................................36 Cloud Security .............................................................................10 RightPath – DOE/NNSA Cloud Strategy ...........................11 PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY ..............38 Vision ..............................................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Fukun Tang Enrico Fermi Institute, the University of Chicago 5640 S. Ellis
    Fukun Tang Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago 5640 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Tel: (773)-834-4286 Fax: (773)-702-2971 Email: [email protected] Professional Employment: 1994.12-present: Sr. Electronics Engineer, Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, USA. 1994.6-1994.12: Research Associate, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. 1993.1-1994.5: Electronics Engineer, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA. 1988.3-1992.12: Electronics Engineer, IHEP, China. 1986.3-1988.2: Electronics Engineer, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA 1979.1-1986.2: Assistant Engineer, IHEP, China. Professional Service: Member of IEEE. Member of Scientific Advisory Committee of Computer Applications in Nuclear and Plasma Sciences, IEEE. Elsevior Reviewer of Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A. Peer Reviewer of Transactions on Nuclear Science. Referee of IEEE NSS/MIC Conference. Member of Nuclear Electronics and Detector Technology Society of China (1980-1986). Member of Nuclear Medical Imaging Technology Society of China (1980-1986). USA Patents: (1): 2011/0220,802 Use of Flat Panel Micro-channel Photomultipliers in Sampling Calorimeter with Timing. (2) US Patent No: 7485872, Large area, Pico-second Resolution, Time of Flight Detectors Education: 1978, Nuclear Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China 2005, Project Management Program, The University of Chicago. Fields of Expertise: Very high speed, low-noise analog front-end, data acquisition and trigger electronics for high energy physics experiments, astronomy and cosmology researches. Ultra-high speed pulse sampling techniques for large-area, pico- seconds timing resolution of time-of-flight applications for high energy experiments and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) instrumentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Chicago Sep 2008—Aug 2009 FINAL REPORT
    The world’s largesT science celeBraTion. science chicago sep 2008—aug 2009 Final REPORT Spearheaded by the Museum of Science and Science is essential for our Industry and in partnership with Chicago’s leading civic, academic, scientific, corporate collective health and well-being, and nonprofit institutions, Science Chicago began as a year-long collaborative initiative to: economic viability and our > Highlight science and technology achievements > Increase access to science learning future. As Chicagoans, we each experiences > Promote dialogue about the importance of have a stake in ensuring that science and technology in the Chicago region. our region continues to respect, From September 2008 — August 2009, citizens enjoyed unparalleled access to more than 1,200 support and value science. dynamic in-person science experiences and countless ways to explore and share science on the web. This report presents highlights of the Science Chicago initiative; for more detailed highlights please refer to the website. We are grateful to the following donors for their generous support of The John D. and Catherine Abbott Science Chicago: T. MacArthur Foundation The Boeing Company The Searle Funds at The Chicago Illinois Tool Works Inc. Community Trust Motorola Table of Contents > 1 About Science Chicago 3 Letters 4 Executive Director letter Board of Advisor Co-Chair letters Board of Advisors Vice-Chair letter Science Council Chair letter Leadership and Staff 8 Board of Advisors Science Council Leadership Committee Honorary Committee Staff Project
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Pile-1 - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Chicago Pile-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Chicago Pile-1 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates : 41°47′32″N 87°36′3″W Main page Contents Chicago Pile-1 (CP-1) was the world's first nuclear Site of the First Self Sustaining Nuclear Featured content reactor to achieve criticality. Its construction was part of Reaction Current events the Manhattan Project, the Allied effort to create atomic U.S. National Register of Historic Places Random article bombs during World War II. It was built by the U.S. National Historic Landmark Donate to Wikipedia Manhattan Project's Metallurgical Laboratory at the Wikipedia store Chicago Landmark University of Chicago , under the west viewing stands of Interaction the original Stagg Field . The first man-made self- Help sustaining nuclear chain reaction was initiated in CP-1 About Wikipedia on 2 December 1942, under the supervision of Enrico Community portal Recent changes Fermi, who described the apparatus as "a crude pile of [4] Contact page black bricks and wooden timbers". Tools The reactor was assembled in November 1942, by a team What links here that included Fermi, Leo Szilard , discoverer of the chain Related changes reaction, and Herbert L. Anderson, Walter Zinn, Martin Upload file D. Whitaker, and George Weil . It contained 45,000 Drawing of the reactor Special pages graphite blocks weighing 400 short tons (360 t) used as Permanent link a neutron moderator , and was fueled by 6 short tons Page information Wikidata item (5.4 t) of uranium metal and 50 short tons (45 t) of Cite this page uranium oxide.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Department of Energy's Ten-Year-Plans for the Office Of
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The U.S. Department of Energy’s Ten-Year-Plans for the Office of Science National Laboratories FY 2019 FY 2019 Annual Laboratory Plans for the Office of Science National Laboratories i Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................1 Ames Laboratory ........................................................................................................................................................3 Lab-at-a-Glance ......................................................................................................................................................3 Mission and Overview ............................................................................................................................................3 Core Capabilities .....................................................................................................................................................4 Science Strategy for the Future ..............................................................................................................................8 Infrastructure .........................................................................................................................................................8 Argonne National Laboratory .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Supplement Analysis for the Final
    DOE/EIS-0225-SA-06 June 2018 FINAL SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE PANTEX PLANT AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON COMPONENTS U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration NNSA Production Office SA for the Pantex Plant SWEIS June 2018 SUMMARY The Pantex Plant (Pantex or Plant) is located in the Texas Panhandle, approximately 17 miles northeast of Amarillo, Texas. Pantex is the primary site for the assembly of nuclear weapons for the nation’s stockpile and disassembly of nuclear weapons being retired from the stockpile. Pantex also evaluates, repairs, and retrofits nuclear weapons in the stockpile; provides interim storage for nuclear material; develops, fabricates, and tests chemical explosives and explosive components for nuclear weapons; and supports the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiatives. In November 1996, DOE issued the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued Operation of the Pantex Plant and Associated Storage of Nuclear Weapon Components (DOE/EIS-0225; DOE 1996a) (referred to as the Pantex Site-Wide EIS [or SWEIS]). The SWEIS assessed impacts on areas of the human and natural environment potentially affected by operations performed at Pantex. The SWEIS evaluated activities associated with ongoing operations, including onsite nuclear material storage, transportation of nuclear material to an alternate site for interim storage, and transportation of classified components between Pantex and other sites occurring over
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), As Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E
    The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), as Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E. Martens Two of the pictures I took during an early visit to the he Common Field site occurs near the bluffs in the site are shown in Figure 1. The first shows Mound A, the TMississippi River floodplain 3 km south of St. Gen- largest of the six then-existing mounds. The nose of my evieve and approximately 90 km south of St. Louis. It is brand-new 1980 Volkswagen parked on the farm road is a large Mississippian-period site that once had as many as in the lower right corner of the picture. The second photo eight mounds (Bushnell 1914:666). It was long considered shows the outline of a burned house structure typical of to be an unoccupied civic-ceremonial center because very many evident across the site. Although it has been noted few surface artifacts were found. This all changed due that many people visited the site shortly after the flood, I to a flood in December 1979, when the Mississippi River did not meet anyone during several visits in 1980 and 1981. swept across the Common Field site. The resulting erosion I subsequently learned that Dr. Michael O’Brien led removed up to 40 cm of topsoil, exposing: a group of University of Missouri (MU) personnel in a [a] tremendous quantity of archaeological material limited survey and fieldwork activity in the spring of 1980. including ceramic plates, pots and other vessels, articu- The first phase entailed aerial photography (black-and- lated human burials, well defined structural remains white and false-color infrared) of the site.
    [Show full text]