Argentina: the National Congress Under the Gaze of a Lame Duck Kirchnerism?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Argentina: the National Congress Under the Gaze of a Lame Duck Kirchnerism? SPECIAL REPORT Argentina: The National Congress under the gaze of a lame duck Kirchnerism? Buenos Aires, April 2015 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO ARGENTINA: THE NATIONAL CONGRESS UNDER THE GAZE OF A LAME DUCK KIRCHNERISM? 1. INTRODUCTION In 2015 we could witness the end of a political process called 1. INTRODUCTION “Kirchnerism”, which has governed Argentine for 12 years in a 2. KIRCHNERISM AND LEGISLATIVE row, and which was started by Nestor Kirchner in 2003 and then POWER continued by his wife Cristina Fernández de Kirchner for two 3. THE CONGRESS IN 2014 more terms. 4. EXPECTATIONS FOR 2015 5. ¿AND WHAT ABOUT 2016? This year will also be a period deeply influenced by electoral 6. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS politics. The Argentinian Constitution prevents a new reelection of the current President. This means the President is living her last year in office and December the 10th 2015 it will be the last AUTHOR day of her term. We could have a second round on the elections which are always formed by the primary elections and the first round: this second round is known as the Ballotage or second round1. To this possible second round we need to add the provincial and municipal elections. In the most populated districts the elections will be divided (Federal capital, Cordoba, Mendoza and Santa Fe). Apart from the new President, new seats for the National Congress will also be elected. So far, the governing party rules the legislative agenda and is in possession of a majority of one's own although with a lower number of parliamentarians. The Constitution defines the legislative power as one of the three powers of the State and gives it different power like for example, financial and economic prerogatives like setting taxes, loans, pass the State’s budget, arrange the payment of the external debt and legislate in the area of customs. This Congress full of faculties according to the Constitution is set on a country with a strong presidential influence. Whenever the country goes through good times regarding the public opinion the executive power will always have primacy over the legislative power and will set its agenda. This article analyzes the relationship and use of the National Congress since 2003 by the government. It includes key laws, big debates, the current scenario and the perspectives for 2016 with the appointment of a new President. para 2016, con la asunción de un nuevo presidente. 1 As established in the Electoral Code (Art. 149) the President will be the one who obtains more than 45% of the valid votes cast or who obtains 40% of the votes and a difference of over 10% regarding the second most voted candidate. 2 ARGENTINA: THE NATIONAL CONGRESS UNDER THE GAZE OF A LAME DUCK KIRCHNERISM? 2. KIRCHNERISM AND • Kirchnerism legislative LEGISLATIVE POWER majority (December “The Kirchnerism 2005–December 2009 / Since the Kirchnerism period December 2011– December government has started, the relationship with 2015): The Kirchnerism enjoyed eight years of the legislative power has government has enjoyed legislative majority” changed according to the eight years of legislative number of legislators sided majority. During these with the government’s party, periods the Congress has the Front for Victory (FPV). worked according to the This variable relationship has President’s government existed all along the Kirnchner agenda. Thus, opposing government and has moved parties have not had the from pragmatism to idealism opportunity to stop certain several times. We can identify projects or proposing three different periods of this minimal reforms to others. variable relationship: By holding with strength • Beginning of the its majority and imposing Kirchnerism (May 2003 a strict party discipline - December 2005): Due to (avoiding internal fissures), the absence of a legislative the FPV managed to pass all majority the Front for the legislative proposals done Victory had to negotiate by the Pink House (mansion with several political forces and office of the President) in order to accomplish the and sometimes the proposals necessary laws to start the were passed without government. Among these amendments; as they were laws we can highlight the presented to the Congress. declaration of invalidity of the Due Obedience Several laws with high and Full Stop Acts, the impact and importance delegation of legislative in society have been power and changes on the passed along these years. convertibility regime. Some examples are the nationalization of YPF and Moreover, the ruling party the Argentine Airlines; profited the political the same sex marriage context of weakness Act, the reforms on the regarding the opposing Civil and Commercial parties which were deeply Code; the Memorandum of affected by the 2001 crisis Understanding signed with that took the Radical party Iran; the nationalization of (with more than 100 years pension funds (AFJP) and of history) to a deep crisis. the Pension hike Bill. 3 ARGENTINA: THE NATIONAL CONGRESS UNDER THE GAZE OF A LAME DUCK KIRCHNERISM? • Opposition majority and 82% adjustable wage for block strategy (December retired people or the “Ley “Regarding the 2009 – December 2011): Glaciares”. The elections in 2009 legislative activity, 2014 reflected the social climate The main characteristics was a revitalizing year” of protests during 2008 of the Congress since 2003 and the Kirchnerism have been: lost its majority in the Chamber of Deputies2. » Passing bills with a high From this moment until social impact although 2011, the Kirchnerism most of them were blocked the activation of drafted and proposed the Congress thanks to by the executive branch the lack of coordination and suffered few of the opposition which amendments during was formed by different their legislative process. political parties with different ideologies. » Delegating economic faculties to the The heterogeneous group Executive power. A formed by all those legislators opposing » Having an agenda set Kirchnerism had to face a by the executive power compact pro-government when the government’s group in the Chamber of party held the majority Deputies which stopped and almost a total block them from meeting their when the opposition legislative agenda with no held the majority. quorum in the debates. » Opposition –through As for the Senate, where action or omission– it maintained its majority, with few chances to act. the FPV tried to block the main initiatives that the 3. THE CONGRESS IN 2014 opposition had managed to propose thanks to some THE PERIOD 132 IN FIGURES unusual allies. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner Regarding the legislative vetoed all the opposition’s activity, 2014 was a revitalizing project that her party year: there were 42 sessions –20 (FPV) had not managed in the Chamber of Deputies to block, such as the and 22 in the Senate–, which 2 While it still held the majority in the Parliament and forecasting this possible scenario, between June and December 2009 the FPV passed all the laws the Government needed. Some of them were emblematic such as the nationalization of the pension funds and the Media Act. Other laws were part of the management of the country such as the Economic Emergency Act which was passed after the political and economic crisis in 2001 and which has been later extended along the years. 4 ARGENTINA: THE NATIONAL CONGRESS UNDER THE GAZE OF A LAME DUCK KIRCHNERISM? means an increase by 50% It also allows it to apply regarding the previous year. penalties to those who “Only 12% of the Acts increase prices without According to the number of the justification of a costs’ passed where proposed Acts passed –a total of 184 increase or to those who by the opposition” Acts– we can say that the control goods and refuse revitalization of the Argentine selling. Congress comes from the efforts of the FPV to give more • A jurisdiction for power to the Legislative branch, consumers: Create a which absorbed a great part of jurisdiction to manage the political debate in 2014. consumers’ claims. The opposition accused the • Agreement with Repsol Government of using the to nationalize YPF: After Congress as an “inkstand” the negotiations started without opportunities to by the Pink House in 2012, debate. If we analyzed all the there was an agreement Acts passed we can observe to pay a compensation of that, in fact, 88% of the Acts 5.000 million of dollars passed (162) were proposed by to the Spanish company. the governing party as a whole The opposition did not (the Government and the FPV). agree with the amount On the other hand, according to or the conditions of the the last review of the Fundación agreement. Directorio Legislativo3, only 12% of the Acts passed where • Legal digest: This regulation proposed by the opposition and reorganizes the Argentinean they did not mean great political, legal system. From the economic or social changes. 30,000 existing laws only 10% were applicable after the Among those Acts with a reorganization. higher impact proposed by the Government we can highlight: • State’s responsibility in the concession of public • Supply Bill: This project services: This regulation was firmly rejected by the limits the responsibility business sector. It meant of the State regarding the the update of an Act damage caused to the goods from 1974 which enables or rights of individuals by the Executive branch to its activities. set profit margins and reference prices at any stage Regarding the topics of the of the economic process. Acts passed in 2014, more than 3 The Fundación Directorio Legislativo is a foundation specialized in Parliamentary issues with more than 15 years of experience monitoring the National Congress’s work, sessions, voting and activities. 5 ARGENTINA: THE NATIONAL CONGRESS UNDER THE GAZE OF A LAME DUCK KIRCHNERISM? a half belong to International the initiatives proposed by the Treaties and declarations by the Government.
Recommended publications
  • 55 130516 Informe Especial El Congreso Argentino.Indd
    SPECIAL REPORT The Argentinian Congress: political outlook in an election year Buenos Aires, May 2013 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO THE ARGENTINIAN CONGRESS: POLITICAL OUTLOOK IN AN ELECTION YEAR 1. INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WHAT HAPPENED IN 2012? 3. 2013 OUTLOOK On 1st March 2013, the president of Argentina, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, opened a new regular sessions’ period in the Argentinian 4. JUSTICE REFORM AND ITS Congress. POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES 5. 2013 LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS In her message, broadcasted on national radio and television, the 6. CONCLUSIONS head of state summarized the main economic indicators of Argentina AUTHORS and how they had developed over the last 10 years of Kirchner’s LLORENTE & CUENCA administration, a timeframe she called “a won decade”. National deputies and senators, in Legislative Assembly, attended the Presidential speech after having taken part in 23 sessions in each House, which strongly contrasts with the fi gure registered in 2011, when approximately a dozen sessions were held. The central point of her speech was the announcement of the outlines of what she called “the democratization of justice”. The modifi cation of the Judicial Council, the creation of three new Courts of Cassation and the regulation of the use of precautionary measures in lawsuits against the state were, among others, the initiatives that the president promised to send to Congress for discussion. Therefore, the judicial system reform became the main political issue in the 2013 public agenda and had a noteworthy impact on all areas of Argentinian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Encuesta De Satisfacción Política Y Opinión Pública
    Encuesta de Satisfacción Política y Opinión Pública #ESPOP Abril 2018 1 Metodología • Estos son hallazgos de la encuesta de satisfacción política y opinion pública de la Universidad de San Andrés. En total fueron realizadas 1004 entrevistas entre el 16 y el 23 de Abril de 2018 a adultos de 18-64 años conectados a internet, en Argentina. • La encuesta se realiza en 23 provincias y la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires vía el Panel online de Netquest. La muestra es proporcional al tamaño de las provincias (con algunos ajustes para garantizar base de lectura) y representativa a nivel de las regiones. Las provincias fueron agrupadas en 5 regiones: NOA, NEA, Cuyo, Centro, Patagonia, y Buenos Aires dividida a su vez en CABA, GBA e interior de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Se aplicaron cuotas de sexo, edad y nivel socioeconómico. • La encuesta versa sobre satisfacción con el desempeño de los poderes políticos y las políticas públicas y sobre la opinion respecto de los principals líderes politicos nacionales, grupos y sectores, ministros y gobernadores. Algunas preguntas siguen una serie de tiempo basada en la encuesta de Indicadores de Satisfacción Política Institucional (ISPI) realizada por la Universidad de San Andrés e Ipsos de Marzo de 2016 a Mayo de 2017. En la presente investigación se modificaron las escalas numéricas de satisfacción y opinion (antes de 1-10) por escalasordinales de 4 categorías (dos positivas y dos negativas). Los valores de las series de tiempo fueron recategorizados para ser comparabales con las nuevas mediciones. • Cuando los resultados no sumen 100, eso puede deberse a redondeos computacionales,, respuestas múltiples o la exclusión de los que no saben o no contestan.
    [Show full text]
  • “Bringing Militancy to Management”: an Approach to the Relationship
    “Bringing Militancy to Management”: An Approach to the Relationship between Activism 67 “Bringing Militancy to Management”: An Approach to the Relationship between Activism and Government Employment during the Cristina Fernández de Kirchner Administration in Argentina Melina Vázquez* Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract This article explores the relationship between employment in public administration and militant commitment, which is understood as that which the actors themselves define as “militant management.” To this end, an analysis is presented of three groups created within three Argentine ministries that adopted “Kirchnerist” ideology: La graN maKro (The Great Makro), the Juventud de Obras Públicas, and the Corriente de Libertación Nacional. The article explores the conditions of possibility and principal characteristics of this activism as well as the guidelines for admission, continuing membership, and promotion – both within the groups and within government entities – and the way that this type of militancy is articulated with expert, professional and academic capital as well as the capital constituted by the militants themselves. Keywords: Activism, expert knowledge, militant careers, state. * Article received on November 22, 2013; final version approved on March 26, 2014. This article is part of a series of studies that the author is working on as a researcher at CONICET and is part of the project “Activism and the Political Commitment of Youth: A Socio-Historical Study of their Political and Activist Experiences (1969-2011)” sponsored by the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion, Argentine Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation (2012-2015), of which the author is the director.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina's 2015 Presidential Election
    CRS INSIGHT Argentina's 2015 Presidential Election October 26, 2015 (IN10378) | Related Author Mark P. Sullivan | Mark P. Sullivan, Specialist in Latin American Affairs ([email protected], 7-7689) Argentines went to the polls on October 25, 2015, to vote in the first round of a presidential race to succeed President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who hails from the Peronist party's leftist faction known as the Front of Victory (FPV). The close results set up a second round on November 22, 2015, between Daniel Scioli, governor of Buenos Aires province running under the banner of President Fernández's FPV, and Mauricio Macri, mayor of Buenos Aires, heading the Let's Change coalition that includes center-right and center-left opposition parties. In the first round, with 97% of the votes counted, Scioli received 36.86% of the vote, Macri received 34.33%, and Sergio Massa, a deputy in Argentina's Congress who heads a centrist dissident Peronist faction known as United for a New Alternative (UNA), received 21.34%. A second round is required since no candidate received 45% of the vote or 40% of the vote with a 10- point lead. The contest is significant since it is the first time in 12 years that a Kirchner will not be president. Fernández is serving her second term since 2007, when she succeeded her husband, the late Néstor Kirchner, who served one term beginning in 2003. Fernández is ineligible to run for a third consecutive term, although she would be eligible to run again in 2019. Going into the first round, many observers believed that any of the leading candidates for president would espouse more market-friendly policies than those of the current government, which include currency and price controls and import restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Casaroes the First Y
    LATIN AMERICA AND THE NEW GLOBAL ORDER GLOBAL THE NEW AND AMERICA LATIN Antonella Mori Do, C. Quoditia dium hucient. Ur, P. Si pericon senatus et is aa. vivignatque prid di publici factem moltodions prem virmili LATIN AMERICA AND patus et publin tem es ius haleri effrem. Nos consultus hiliam tabem nes? Acit, eorsus, ut videferem hos morei pecur que Founded in 1934, ISPI is THE NEW GLOBAL ORDER an independent think tank alicae audampe ctatum mortanti, consint essenda chuidem Dangers and Opportunities committed to the study of se num ute es condamdit nicepes tistrei tem unum rem et international political and ductam et; nunihilin Itam medo, nondem rebus. But gra? in a Multipolar World economic dynamics. Iri consuli, ut C. me estravo cchilnem mac viri, quastrum It is the only Italian Institute re et in se in hinam dic ili poraverdin temulabem ducibun edited by Antonella Mori – and one of the very few in iquondam audactum pero, se issoltum, nequam mo et, introduction by Paolo Magri Europe – to combine research et vivigna, ad cultorum. Dum P. Sp. At fuides dermandam, activities with a significant mihilin gultum faci pro, us, unum urbit? Ublicon tem commitment to training, events, Romnit pari pest prorimis. Satquem nos ta nostratil vid and global risk analysis for pultis num, quonsuliciae nost intus verio vis cem consulicis, companies and institutions. nos intenatiam atum inventi liconsulvit, convoliis me ISPI favours an interdisciplinary and policy-oriented approach perfes confecturiae audemus, Pala quam cumus, obsent, made possible by a research quituam pesis. Am, quam nocae num et L. Ad inatisulic team of over 50 analysts and tam opubliciam achum is.
    [Show full text]
  • The First 100 Days of Alberto Fernandez
    The first 100 days of Alberto Fernandez 1 REPORT THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF ALBERTO FERNANDEZ Madrid, March 18, 2020 ideas.llorenteycuenca.com The first 100 days of Alberto Fernandez The first one hundred days of a government Kirchnerism’s leading figure is Cristina Fernandez, are usually considered a precedent, based on the Vice president of Argentina and Head of the which it is possible to forecast some of its guiding Senate, and Axel Kicillof, governor of the province principles. During this period, the presidential of Buenos Aires, the largest in the country. The imprint and style are defined. In the case of influence of this movement covers several areas Alberto Fernandez’s Argentina, this stage is even of government and Congress. more relevant, considering the fact that his party is a coalition between different factions of The Frente Renovador, on the other hand, was Peronism that now coexist in power. given control of the Lower House, headed today by Sergio Massa, the Ministry of Transportation, The complexity of these coexisting political the National Telecommunications Agency forces is further enhanced by a fragile economic (ENACOM), the state-owned water company and social scenario that the new Argentine (AYSA) and the Legislature of the Province of government must face, with an economic Buenos Aires. recession—drops in the GDP of 2.5% and 2.1% in 2018 and 2019 respectively—and a high inflation Other key positions were given to the President’s (over 50% last year). Furthermore, society has closer circle. This includes Santiago Cafiero, Chief been seriously affected by the crisis and a hefty of Staff; Julio Vitobello, Secretary-general of the 2 foreign debt, of about 97% of the country’s GDP, Presidency; Vilma Ibarra, Head of the Legal and both with private creditors and the International Technical Secretariat; and Juan Pablo Biondi, Monetary Fund (IMF) that must be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Argentina Date of Election: October 25, 2015 Prepared by: Noam Lupu, Carlos Gervasoni, Virginia Oliveros, and Luis Schiumerini Date of Preparation: December 2016 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative [X] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [ ] Lower House [X] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? Frente para la Victoria, FPV (Front for Victory)1 2b.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina: Peronism Returns María Victoria Murillo, S.J
    Argentina: Peronism Returns María Victoria Murillo, S.J. Rodrigo Zarazaga Journal of Democracy, Volume 31, Number 2, April 2020, pp. 125-136 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/753199 [ Access provided at 9 Apr 2020 16:36 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] ARGENTINA: PERONISM RETURNS María Victoria Murillo and Rodrigo Zarazaga, S.J. María Victoria Murillo is professor of political science and interna- tional and public affairs and director of the Institute of Latin American Studies at Columbia University. Rodrigo Zarazaga, S.J., is director of the Center for Research and Social Action (CIAS) and researcher at the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) in Buenos Aires. The headline news, the main takeaway, from Argentina’s 2019 gen- eral election is encouraging for democracy despite the dire economic situation. Mauricio Macri, a president not associated with the country’s powerful Peronist movement, became the first such chief executive to complete his mandate, whereas two non-Peronists before him had failed to do so.1 Macri would not repeat his term, however. He lost the 27 October 2019 election and then oversaw a peaceful handover of power to his Peronist rival, Alberto Fernández, who won by 48 to 40 percent and whose vice-president is former two-term president Cristina Fernán- dez de Kirchner (no relation). Strikingly, even the economic hard times gripping the country—they are the worst in two decades, and they sank Macri at the polls—could not ruffle the orderliness of the transition. Peaceful changes of administration tend to be taken for granted in democracies, but they are in fact major achievements anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMARY ELECTIONS Special Report
    PRIMARY ELECTIONS Special Report WHAT IS AT STAKE? Provincial Elections President 24 130 National Representatives Provinces of Catamarca, Buenos Aires, and the City of Vicepresident National Senators Buenos Aires held primary elections to governor while Santa Cruz had general election. NATIONAL PROVISIONAL RESULTS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTIONS s 47.65% PARTICIPATION: 75,78% Alberto Fernández – Cristina Fernández de Kirchner 32.08% Mauricio Macri - Miguel Ángel Pichetto 8.22% Roberto Lavagna – Juan Manuel Urtubey 2.86% Nicolás del Caño – Romina del Pla 2.63% Juan J. Gómez Centurión – Cynthia Hotton 2.18% José Luis Espert – Luis Rosales ELECTORAL THRESHOLD 1.5% 0.71% Manuela Castañeira – Eduardo Mulhall 0.24% Alejandro Biondini – Enrique Venturino 0.14% Raul Albarracín – Sergio Pastore 0.13% José Antonio Romero Feris – Guillermo Sueldo POLITICAL SUPPORT KEYS #1 THE CENTER REGION VOTE #2 BUENOS AIRES SUPPORT #3 THE REST OF THE COUNTRY The National Government In the first section of the Other provinces, mainly driven expected to count with greater province of Buenos Aires, by the support of several support in Córdoba and Santa bastion of Cambiemos in 2015 Peronist governors, also added Fe, that along with Mendoza, and 2017, the officialism got an important part of votes that would provide a number of adverse results from expected summed up in the final result votes to face the tight scenario while in the other two -of an led Alberto Fernández to win in the province of Buenos Aires, average lower income-, the with several points ahead. but finally it turned the opposite Frente de Todos prevailed with way.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Climate Report
    CONTACT INFORMATION PUBLIC POLICY, RISK & STRATEGY Ing. Antonio Arcos 1830 Juan Cruz Díaz [email protected] Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1428AFB Megan Cook República Argentina [email protected] REPORT [email protected] Katrina Cohen Cosentino www.cefeidas.com [email protected] Agustina Jabornisky +54 (11) 5238 0991 (ARG) [email protected] +1 (646) 233 3204 (USA) Political Climate Report - ARGENTINA June 1, 2021 POLITICAL CLIMATE IN THIS ISSUE Recent weeks were dominated by political debate over the Page 2 COVID-19 response becomes government’s response to the second wave of COVID-19, especially political battlefield a dispute between the national government and Buenos Aires City Page 4 about in-person classes. Meanwhile, internal tensions within the Government and opposition coalitions see internal tensions ahead of midterms government coalition have generated challenges for policymaking Update on Argentina’s vaccination and undermined its authority but do not seem to threaten its unity campaign ahead of the midterm elections. At the same time, a fresh conflict Page 5 has occurred between the national government and the agricultural Government increases intervention as inflation fails to slow sector due to government policies aimed at curbing inflation, which remains high. On the international front, in early May, the president Page 7 Government travels to Europe, embarked on a tour to Europe, seeking support for efforts to seeks to postpone Paris Club restructure its debt and avoid default. Meanwhile, congressional payment activity has picked up, with a few key bills under discussion, Page 8 including a public health emergency law, update of the biofuels Congress active as government advances agenda framework, reform of the public prosecutor’s office, corporate Page 9 income tax reform, and a bill to postpone the midterms.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing European Parliamentary Research Service
    At a glance September 2015 Argentina: Political parties and the EU Argentina's presidential elections are scheduled for October 2015 and, according to the country's Constitution, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner is not entitled to run for a third consecutive term. As regards alternative candidates, the political landscape remains polarised after the primary elections. Argentina has a multi-party political system; however, election results demonstrate that it is, in practical terms, bipartisan. The Peronists, represented by the Justicialist Party (PJ), and the radicals, represented by the Civic Radical Union (UCR), effectively alternate in power. Argentinian political decision-making is opaque, complex and volatile. Parties play for power in changing coalitions, splits and mergers, which lead to a constantly changing political landscape of alliances. Political and Electoral System The Constitution of Argentina dates back to 1853. It remained in force under the various military regimes, with the exception of the Peronist constitutional period between 1949 and 1956. Over the years, it has been subject to a number of amendments, the most important in 1953, and recently in 1994. Argentina is a federal republic with division of powers. The executive is currently represented by the President, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, from the centre-left Peronist faction, Front For Victory (FPV), which belongs to the Justicialist Party. The President is elected for a four-year term with the possibility of being re-elected for only one consecutive term. Elections take place in two rounds. To be directly elected in the first round, the candidate needs to obtain 45% of the votes cast, or 40% and be 11% ahead of the second candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina: a Change of Course
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNALPOLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING Argentina: A change of course Author: Jesper TVEVAD On 10 December 2015, Mauricio Macri will assume the presidency of Argentina for four years, replacing President Cristina Fernández who has been in power since 2007. Macri, who has been mayor of the city of Buenos Aires since 2007, was elected to the post in the second round of the On 22 November 2015, presidential elections on 22 November 2015, when he received 51.4 % of the Mauricio Macri, candidate vote, against 48.6 % for Daniel Scioli of the governing Front for Victory (Frente of a coalition named 'Let's change' (Cambiemos), was para la Victoria, FpV). elected president of Macri was the candidate of a coalition named 'Let's change' (Cambiemos), Argentina. He will assume which included his own centre-right 'Republican Proposal' (Propuesta office on 10 December. Republicana, PRO). He is the first elected president in more than a century not to come from one of Argentina's two dominant political forces, the Peronist Macri received 51.4 % of the Party and the Radical Civic Union (Unión Cívica Radical, UCR). Macri's election vote in the second round of ends 12 years of Peronist governments under President Néstor Kirchner the presidential elections. (2003-2007) and his wife and successor, Cristina Fernández; it may also spell the demise of 'kirchnerism' (kirchnerismo), a broad popular movement representing the legacy of the Peronist tradition. However, parliamentary and His election ends 12 years provincial elections on 25 October confirmed the FpV as the strongest sector of Peronist governments.
    [Show full text]