DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstract This Dissertation Investigates Specific Conceptual and Ideological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstract This Dissertation Investigates Specific Conceptual and Ideological Abstract This dissertation investigates specific conceptual and ideological similarities and differences between Israelite religion on the one hand, and Canaanite (Ugaritic) and Mesopotamian religions on the other, by reexamining concrete or ritualistic cultic practices common to both. Though many of the religious practices of the Israelites mirrored ancient Near East practice in form, seemingly they would function quite differently when placed in a different, ideological context. As such, this investigation notes the theological and ideological differences that distinguish Israelite religion from ancient Near Eastern religions, specifically monotheism and the covenant relationship between Yahweh and Israel. Specific Israelite cultic practices are examined by placing them against the background of similar ancient Near Eastern religious practices. Specifically, the accoutrements in the Holy Place (the lampstand, altar of incense, and table) are test cases to determine if this differentiation is tangible. Finally, suggestions will be made as to how these practices reinforced Israel’s unique ideological framework as proponents of Yahwism sought to establish their faith amidst a sea of alternatives. Theological Function As the Key to Israelite Religious Distinctiveness in the Ancient Near East: the Holy Place As a Case Study A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Asbury Theological Seminary Wilmore, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biblical Studies Dissertation Committee: Dr. Bill Arnold, Mentor Dr. Lawson Stone, Reader Dr. John Cook, Examiner By Samuel C. Long May 2017 ii Copyright 2017 Samuel C. Long All rights reserved iii Table of Contents Lists of Tables...............................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................1 1.1 Selected Forschungsgeschichte and Current State of Scholarship .............................3 1.2 The Old Testament’s Self-Attestation of Uniqueness ...............................................14 1.3 Purpose and Parameters of the Study .........................................................................18 Chapter 2: The Question of Israelite Distinctiveness ...................................................................21 2.1 Evolutionary Model ....................................................................................................22 2.2 Transformational Model .............................................................................................26 2.3 Distinctive Ideology 1: Monotheism ..........................................................................35 2.4 Distinctive Ideology 2: Covenant ...............................................................................39 2.5 Israelite Context of their Distinctive Ideologies: The Sinai Covenant .......................45 2.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................47 Chapter 3: The Table ....................................................................................................................52 3.1 Ancient Near Eastern Practice of Feeding and Caring for the gods ...........................53 3.1.1 Atrahasis ......................................................................................................53 3.1.2 Enuma Elish.................................................................................................55 3.1.3 Epic of Gilgamesh........................................................................................55 3.1.4 Incarnating the Deity....................................................................................56 3.1.5 The Divine Meal ..........................................................................................62 3.2 Israel and its Table......................................................................................................65 3.2.1 The Blueprint: Exodus 25:23-30..................................................................68 3.2.2 The Transportation Requirements: Numbers 4:7-8 .....................................75 3.2.3 The Instructions for Cultic Use: Leviticus 24:5-9 .......................................76 3.2.4 Summary and Observations .........................................................................78 3.3 Similarities and Differences from “feeding the gods”................................................81 3.4 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................85 i Chapter 4: The Lampstand............................................................................................................88 4.1 Ancient Near East Fertility and Light Background ....................................................89 4.1.1 Light.............................................................................................................89 4.1.2 Fertility.........................................................................................................91 4.2 The Israelite Lampstand..............................................................................................94 4.2.1 Form of the Lampstand................................................................................95 4.3 Synthesis and Functional Suggestions.......................................................................103 4.3.1 Presence ......................................................................................................104 4.3.2 Life............................................................................................................ 106 4.3.3 Synthesis ................................................................................................... 109 4.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 110 Chapter 5: The Incense Altar ..................................................................................................... 111 5.1 Incense in the ancient Near East .............................................................................. 111 5.1.1 Examples in ancient Near Eastern Literature ........................................... 114 5.2 Incense in Israelite Religion..................................................................................... 116 5.2.1 Altar Construction..................................................................................... 117 5.2.2 Incense Usage ........................................................................................... 118 123 ......................................................................................................... אזכרה 5.2.3 5.2.3.1 Ancient Near Eastern Parallels .............................................................. 130 5.2.3.2 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 131 5.3 Synthesis and Function ............................................................................................ 132 5.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 135 Chapter 6—Tamid as the Uniting Feature of the Covenant....................................................... 137 Chapter 7—Summary of Investigation and Conclusions........................................................... 146 7.1 Table ........................................................................................................................ 147 7.2 Lampstand................................................................................................................ 148 7.3 Incense ..................................................................................................................... 150 7.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 150 ii Lists of Tables Table 1: Table and Bread Descriptions...................................................................................... 67 Table 2: Comparison of Hebrew and Greek in regard to the vessels......................................... 72 Table 3: Comparison of Hebrew and Greek Lampstand Terms ................................................ 100 127 ............................................................................................................. אזכרה Table 4: Usage of iii Acknowledgements It was in a Genesis class in the late ‘90s at Great Lakes Christian College when Dr. Paul Kissling introduced me to the idea of polemic. The suggestion that the biblical writers were doing more than retelling history, but were intentionally separating and distancing themselves from the surrounding culture and religious belief—this approach changed the way I viewed and interpreted the texts. The idea of distinctiveness and the transformational nature of Israelite religion captured my imagination. My interest was piqued further at Emmanuel Christian Seminary, as Dr. Chris Rollston brought his encyclopedic knowledge of aNE religion and culture to bear in and out of the classroom. Upon arriving at Asbury Theological Seminary, I was fortunate enough to learn from professors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Israelite Household and the Decalogue: the Social Background and Significance of Some Commandments*
    Tyndale Bulletin 30 (1979) 101-124. THE ISRAELITE HOUSEHOLD AND THE DECALOGUE: THE SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME COMMANDMENTS* By Christopher J. H. Wright Decalogue study is still in a state of some confusion, with little apparent consensus in any of the critical disciplines./1/ Nevertheless, most scholars, whatever their views on authorship, date, original form, history, etc., agree in recognizing the position of unique importance accorded to the Decalogue in Israel's understanding of her relationship with God. The evidence that it was assigned a unique place of importance by the Old Testament itself, and not just by subsequent Jewish and Christian interpreters, is manifold. The commandments have a special name, the "ten words" . (cf. also Ex. 31:8; Deut. 4:13; 9:9, etc.). Again, they are repeated in Deuteronomy as providing the foundation for the new promulgation of the covenant. The narrative framework of Exodus, but particularly of Deuteronomy, stressed the finality of the commandments: "These words Yahweh spoke . and added no more" (Deut. 5:22). Finally, the reflection of the commandments in the prophets (Hos. 4:lff; Jer. 7:9ff), and in the Psalms (50 and 81) testify to their influence upon Israel's faith./2/ * A paper read at the Tyndale Fellowship Old Testament Study Group in Cambridge, July 1977. 1. For surveys of the critical literature, see J. J. Stamm and M. E. Andrew, The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (London, 1967), and B. S. Childs, Exodus: A Commentary (London, 1974). 2. B. S. Childs, op. cit., 397. 102 TYNDALE BULLETIN 30 (1979) The strength of this influence is reflected in the association of the Decalogue with Sinai, which indicates that it was felt to be essential as the revelation of what in practice was required of those who there became God's people.
    [Show full text]
  • RELI 2110A: Judaism
    Carleton University Summer 2015 The College of the Humanities Religion Program RELI 2110A: Judaism Rabbi Ely M. Braun Office: 2A35 PA Home Phone: 613-721-7629 Email:[email protected] Lectures: Tuesday and Thursday 6:05 pm – 8:55 pm Office Hours: Thursdays 5:00 – 6:00 or by appointment Course description This 2000 level course explores Judaism as a lived religious tradition. We begin with the premise that Judaism is defined by the teachings, beliefs and practices that form the core of Jewish communal life. From this point of view, Judaism is both historical and evolving; rooted in tradition, responding to changing contexts, looking towards its own future. Practiced by Jews in community all around the world, Judaism is a dynamic and richly diverse tradition that includes a range of teachings and practices. This diversity can be a challenge for students who are at the early stages of studying Judaism. One way into this problem is to begin where Jewish communities begin in defining their own identity: Jews understand themselves as standing in relationship to, and in continuity with, a historical past, practices and traditions. We will examine Jewish practices as they relate to the calendar and life cycle. We will examine the response of Judaism to history, culture conflicts and geographic changes. Course Evaluation: The final grade of this course is based on the followings: 10% creating questions on readings and lectures 90% 3 tests (2 will be take-home*, the last will be an electronically graded multiple-choice test to be given as part of the scheduled final exam period – the date will be announced and scheduled by the University) * Due dates: May 21st and June 4th.
    [Show full text]
  • Similarities and Differences Between the Old Testament and the Ancient Near Eastern Texts
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, 5-32. Copyright © 2011 Andrews University Press. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE OLD TESTAMENT AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EASTERN TEXTS ROBE R TO OU R O Adventist School of Theology Sagunto, Valencia, Spain Introduction In 1902, the noted Assyriologist Friedrich Delitzsch presented a series of lectures on comparative studies under the auspices of the German Oriental Society. Delitzsch’s lectures, entitled “Babel und Bibel,” claimed that the literature of the Bible was dependent on, and even borrowed from, the literature of Mesopotamia. He questioned the appropriateness of the traditional theological terminology used to describe the Bible (e.g., revelation, inspiration) in light of its now evident dependency.1 Delitzsch’s work spawned a movement called “Pan-Babylonianism,” which argued that all world myths and Christian Scriptures (OT and NT) were simply versions of Babylonian mythology.2 As the series developed, however, it became clear that the lecturer’s motives were not entirely pure. His interest was to minimize the values of OT teaching so that it could be contrasted with that of the NT.3 The widespread interest in finding connections between the Bible and other ANE cultures has bred its own reaction in the warning raised by several scholars against exaggerating the importance of such similarities, a practice baptized with the name “parallelomania.”4 Of particular concern has been the often tacit assumption that such parallels can be construed as evidence for a genetic connection between the cultures that share them. Despite such warnings, the pendulum of biblical studies has continued to swing back and forth with remarkable regularity over the generations, as initial archeological discoveries have led to enthusiastic claims of similarities with various biblical practices and the implied, if not always stated, conclusion that these constitute the source for the biblical practice in question.
    [Show full text]
  • F.F. Bruce, "Babylon and Rome," the Evangelical Quarterly 13
    F.F. Bruce, “Babylon and Rome,” The Evangelical Quarterly 13 (October 15th, 1941): 241-261. Babylon and Rome F.F. Bruce [p.241] I It cannot seriously be denied that most of the features of advanced Catholic1 ritual have little or no direct warrant in the New Testament. It is frequently urged in support of such ritual that it can be traced in unbroken sequence back to the fourth century. “No sooner did the primitive Church emerge from the centuries of persecution, and acquire freedom from external repression, than it gave full and wonderful expression to its devotional spirit in elaborate and beautiful Symbolic ways.”2 Antiquity, however, is no guarantee of apostolic authority, especially as there is a gap of nearly three centuries between apostolic days and the introduction of the greater part of these ritual practices into the Church. Indeed, far from our being able to find Scriptural authority for these practices, all the available evidence on their provenance goes to show that they were taken over into the Church from the various Mystery cults which were so popular throughout the Roman Empire in the early centuries o£ our era. The appeal to the Fathers cannot take the place of an appeal to the Apostles. “The most honoured of the Fathers were men whose minds were impregnated by the superstitions of Pagan religion, or the subtleties of Pagan philosophy.... They were ‘near the fountain’ of Christianity, forsooth; yes, but they were nearer still to the cesspool of Paganism. And inquiry will show that it is to the cesspool that we should attribute every perversion of the truth which to-day defaces what is called the Christian religion.”3 The proof of the descent of Catholic ritual from the Mysteries is not the object of this paper; for such proof, the reader may consult such works as R.
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the Old Testament Civil Laws Apply Today
    Liberty University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 12 March 2008 How Should the Old Testament Civil Laws Apply Today Joe M. Sprinkle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Sprinkle, Joe M. (2008) "How Should the Old Testament Civil Laws Apply Today," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 2 : Iss. 3 , Article 12. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol2/iss3/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW SHOULD THE OLD TESTAMENT CIVIL LAWS APPLY TODAY? Joe M Sprinklet I. INTRODUCTION What is the role of the Mosaic civil laws today under the new covenant? There have been a number of Christian approaches to this question: the Reformed approach, dispensational approaches, the approach of theonomy (Christian Reconstructionism), and finally the principalizing approach. Each will be discussed in turn. II. THE APPROACH OF REFORMED THEOLOGY TO THE LAW The first approach to the law, an approach that remains influential, is that of Reformed theology. A. The Approach of Reformed Theology to the Law Defined Reformed theology's approach to the law is spelled out in the Westminster Confession of Faith (A.D. 1646) in Chapter XIX "Of the Law of God."' This approach begins by dividing the laws into three categories: moral, ceremonial, and civil. The moral law refers to the broad moral principles of the law, especially as expressed in the Decalogue (Ten Commandments).
    [Show full text]
  • World History--Part 1. Teacher's Guide [And Student Guide]
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 462 784 EC 308 847 AUTHOR Schaap, Eileen, Ed.; Fresen, Sue, Ed. TITLE World History--Part 1. Teacher's Guide [and Student Guide]. Parallel Alternative Strategies for Students (PASS). INSTITUTION Leon County Schools, Tallahassee, FL. Exceptibnal Student Education. SPONS AGENCY Florida State Dept. of Education, Tallahassee. Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services. PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 841p.; Course No. 2109310. Part of the Curriculum Improvement Project funded under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B. AVAILABLE FROM Florida State Dept. of Education, Div. of Public Schools and Community Education, Bureau of Instructional Support and Community Services, Turlington Bldg., Room 628, 325 West Gaines St., Tallahassee, FL 32399-0400. Tel: 850-488-1879; Fax: 850-487-2679; e-mail: cicbisca.mail.doe.state.fl.us; Web site: http://www.leon.k12.fl.us/public/pass. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom - Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF05/PC34 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Accommodations (Disabilities); *Academic Standards; Curriculum; *Disabilities; Educational Strategies; Enrichment Activities; European History; Greek Civilization; Inclusive Schools; Instructional Materials; Latin American History; Non Western Civilization; Secondary Education; Social Studies; Teaching Guides; *Teaching Methods; Textbooks; Units of Study; World Affairs; *World History IDENTIFIERS *Florida ABSTRACT This teacher's guide and student guide unit contains supplemental readings, activities,
    [Show full text]
  • The Babylonian and Hebrew Views of Man's Fate After Death
    THE BABYLONIAN AND HEBREW VIEWS OF MAN'S FATE AFTER DEATH. BY THE EDITOR. THE Jewish ideas concerning the state after death exhibit in several important details a close agreement with Babylonian views. The Hebrew word s/ieo/ C'i^W) "the pit," corresponds ex- actly with the Assyrian sudlu ; both denote the place under the ground where the dead reside. In Assyrian the term is explained as the place of judgment, among the Jews as the place where every living being shall finally be demanded'— a place of ingathering. Habakkuk compares the vicious man's desire to sheol or death who "cannot be satisfied but gathereth unto him all people" (ii. 5). The conception of sheol is modeled after the nature of the grave. Bodies were buried in pits or in holes dug in the ground, only that the pit of sheol was supposed to be deeper than any grave : it was situated underneath the aboriginal tehom, the waters of the deep, viz., the underground flood which in the beginning of the world was divided into the waters above and the waters below the firmament. Sheol is called by the Assyrio-Babylonians, as well as by the Hebrews, " the land whence no traveller returns."^ Istar goes down "to the land without return," and Job describes it as the place "Whence I shall not return, even the land of darkness, and the shadow of death ; a land of darkness, as darkness itself ; and of the shadow of death, without any order, and where the light is as darkness" (x. 21-22).
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Son of Jehozadak 5. Son of Eliezer Joshua (Book and Person)
    757 Joshua (Book and Person) 758 4. Son of Jehozadak from him (in contrast to Moses). He is an isolated Joshua, the son of Jehozadak, is mentioned in Hag- figure, a “one-task hero.” His tomb is extra-territo- gai, Zechariah, and 1 Chronicles (see “Joshua [Son rial in the lot of Ephraim (Josh 19 : 50), even if he of Jehozadak], the High Priest”). He is also men- has been “constructed” to represent this tribe (Num tioned in Ezra 3 as Jeshua (see “Jeshua 6. Son of Je- 14 : 8). This information indicates that Joshua, as hozadak”). opposed to Abraham, Jacob, and Moses, was a Ellen White scribal creation, rather than a figure of tribal tradi- tion. Veneration for the tombs of the prophets be- 5. Son of Eliezer gan in Israel no later than the 4th century BCE (2 Kgs 13 : 20–21, cf. also 1 Kgs 13 : 30–32; 2 Kgs According to Luke 3 : 28–29, one of the ancestors of 23 : 16–18), i.e., around the time the first “book of Jesus was Joshua, son of Eliezer and father of Er. Joshua” ends. The literary history of Joshua began Nothing else is known about him. in the second half of the 7th century BCE, provid- Dale C. Allison, Jr. ing ample time for his tomb to “materialize” by the time the book was concluded. Martin Noth’s hy- Joshua (Book and Person) pothesis, according to which Joshua’s tomb is the (only) attestation of a “historical Joshua,” should I. Hebrew Bible/Old Testament therefore be abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • One More Monotheism in Biblical Israel
    JISMOR 1 Special Issue Once More: Monotheism in Biblical Israel Peter Machinist 1. May I begin with a sincere thank you to my colleagues at Doshisha University for making this lecture and the visit connected with it possible. It is indeed a distinct honor and privilege to be here with you. I have heard a great deal, particularly in the last week since my arrival in Japan, about Doshisha. May I add also that this is not my fi rst visit to Japan. But it is so many years since the last that I feel as if I am on a voyage of new discovery. I came, in fact, 43 years ago with my grandparents, and our travels took us to Tokyo, Kyoto, and Nara. In Kyoto, we were very fortunate to be present at the summer Gion Festival, and it remains a highlight of my memories. Now you have aff orded me the chance to return in a most meaningful way, and I stand in gratitude to you. Th e importance of the theme of monotheism to the study of the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament probably does not need any explanation or defense. Most of us understand the concept of monotheism, however we defi ne it—and we shall come back to the issue of defi nition shortly—as a principal, if not the principal contribution that the Bible has made to human history and culture. Within the traditions that grew out of the Hebrew Bible, namely, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, the concept of a single god remains central, even if they have had various ways of perceiving this.
    [Show full text]
  • YUL.Hamevaser.1.2000-Winter.39.01
    Volume XXXIX, No. Winter 5760 IN HIS Issue: 4 Message from the EditNs YEHODiT ROBINSON 4 Letters STEPHEN Jlt\. TOLANY RABBI ALAM J. YUTER SHANI HOLZEFI i!XCUUIVE INTERVIEW 6 Hamevaser Exclusive Interview RABBI DR. NORMAN LAMM TliUCT AND TEXTUAUSM The of Dovid Tzvl Hoff'man CHANA KOEl'!!GSBERG 14 Reading Difference in Torah FJJYArlU S1ERN 18 Kri U't,tiv: Rabbinic Views on Textual Vai'iance ZEMIRA BARON 18 Kri U'Ktiv: The Spanish Exegetes DEBORAH GELLER 21 Rebecca: The Interpretive Creation of a Matriarch YEHUDIT ROBINSON 24 fire: Gift or Theft YEHUDA SEPTIMUS 26 From the Rabbinic Luminaries to Freud BENJAMIN ,JOFFE 30 An Introduction to Talmud Study RABBI SHMUEL NACHAM 34 Teaching Texts and their Pretexts Views · 36 Modesty and Modernity R,.,BBI YosEF BLAU Interviews 38 Rabbi Shalom Carmy ASHER FRIED.N\AN Dr. Lawrence Schiffman DAVID REGEV 46 Rabbi Mordekhai Sabato EZRA FRAZER . 50 Rabbi Dr. Alan Brill JASON LEIB Rabbi Meidan ARlWE!SEN IU!iVUEWS 54 BOOK· REVIEWS: and Liminality in the Bible SHARI L ROSENBERG 55 A RIVALRY OF GENIUS Uri Goldstein 56 Survey of Recent Orthodox Jewish Periodical Literature MORDY FRlEDMA!'I 58 CvaERToRAH JONATHAN PRICE TO Bl A PART Of fUTUREISSUE.S, PLEASE CONTACT: Itsther Donath~ 212.252.0149 eszado@aotcom - 212.795.0371 [email protected] . a.n e,maU to [email protected] JQBS AVA!lABLf !NCl.!IDE WRmNG, ED!TiNG, BUSINESS, tAYOI.IT, GRAPHICS & WEB. • oll 1 r t rt. ffAMil/1\SU, Whiter 5760 3 e apologize fi.,r the numerous technical diffi. I greatly enjoyed the cxcd!,;;nt imervicv,' culties that dda,_·ed our publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Reli 2110A - Judaism
    Carleton University 2010-2011 The College of the Humanities (Religion Program) RELI 2110A - JUDAISM Rabbi Ely M. Braun Office: Paterson Hall 329C Home Phone: 613-721-7629 Email:[email protected] Lectures: Tues. and Thurs. 1735-2025 Office Hours: Thursdays 1700-1730 and by appointment Course description This 2000 level course explores Judaism as a lived religious tradition. We begin with the premise that Judaism is defined by the teachings, beliefs and practices that form the core of Jewish communal life. From this point of view, Judaism is both historical and evolving; rooted in tradition, responding to changing contexts, looking towards its own future. Practiced by Jews in community all around the world, Judaism is a dynamic and richly diverse tradition that includes a range of teachings and practices. This diversity can be a challenge for students who are at the early stages of studying Judaism. One way into this problem is to begin where Jewish communities begin in defining their own identity: Jews understand themselves as standing in relationship to, and in continuity with, a historical past, practices and traditions. We will examine Jewish practices as they relate to the calendar and life cycle. We will examine the response of Judaism to history, culture conflicts and geographic change Course Evaluation: The final grade of this course is based on the followings: 10% creating questions on readings and lectures 90% 3 short answer tests (2 will be take-home*, the last will be an electronically graded multiple-choice test to be given during the final exam period) * Due dates: May 31st and June 14th.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism Eliezer Segal
    1 Judaism Eliezer Segal The term Judaism, which implies a definable belief-system, has no real equivalent in the traditional vocabulary of the reli­ gion itself. Its widespread use in European languages owes largely to the encounter with Christianity, which attaches greater im­ portance to creeds and doctrines. In Jewish tradition, theology and religious concepts rarely have been perceived as defining features. It is more accurate to employ the term Judaism in a broader cultural sense to denote the full range of religious expressions of the people of Israel (as they almost invariably have referred to themselves). This usage correctly underscores the national char­ acter of the religion, inextricably bound to historical experience, without attaching disproportionate weight to its theological com­ ponent. As we shall observe, Judaism contains a complex variety of elements, including law, ethics, morality, observances, wor­ ship, and beliefs. Technically, the wordJudaism-like its cognate termsJew and Jewish-refers to a more narrowly defined time frame within the longer national history, commencing at the conclusion of (he biblical era. Whereas earlier epochs had known of cwelve tribes of Israel, or of the cwo rival monarchies ofJudah and Israel, a sequence of conquests and exiles brought about a situation in 11 Judaism 13 12 ElrezerSegal Torah can refer to the rich spectrum of Jewish religious tradi­ which only a vestige of the original people, dominated by the tions as they evolved through the ages. The delicate interplay of ancient tribe of Judah and inhabiting its ancestral territory Oral and Written Torahs will be very much in evidence when we Uudea), was able to maintain its religious and cultural identity attempt to trace the evolution ofJewish conceptions of the after­ through subsequent generations.
    [Show full text]