Gas Processing)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gas Processing) Message from Chiyoda Corporation Chiyoda, Responding to New Challenges as a Pioneer We are responding to the changing global trends in Gas Value Chain by proposing optimal solutions. ince our establishment in 1948, we have consistently endeavoured to contribute to global society atural Gas has become an increasingly important energy source over recent years. S based on our corporate philosophy “Energy and Environment in Harmony” whilst maximizing N Energy companies are creating new business opportunities by exploiting unconventional returns on investments for our clients. As a world leading engineering company, we have an sources of gas such as Shale Gas and Coal Bed Methane (CBM). impressive track record with projects being undertaken in more than 40 countries. The majority of We are responding to these global trends by proposing optimal solutions such as the construction of our work has been focused on the energy sector and in particular to the construction of petroleum these small to mid-sized LNG plants which yield superior cost performance and offer a fast delivery with and natural gas plants. modular construction, while continuing to construct conventional LNG plants. We are also ready to provide our services to meetemerging needs in innovative concepts and execution in the harsh, Arctic environment. Chiyoda's strength and expertise lie in its ability See Page 17 and 18 to provide tailor-made responses to client needs. e offer outstanding services which encompass master planning, engineering, procurement, hiyoda’s strength and expertise lies in its ability to provide the best responses to client needs, W construction, commissioning and maintenance. C and our total willingness, as an innovator, to undertake new challenges in the LNG segment. I believe our great strength lies in the development of natural gas and, in particular, liquefied natural gas (LNG). We will continue to build on these strengths as we pursue our goal of creating a sustainable future Since completing our first LNG plant in the UAE in 1976, we have consistently satisfied client requirements for us all. See Page 16 with our state-of-the-art technical ability and unrivaled expertise in the construction of LNG plants. We have successfully completed a number of highly complex projects in recent years, including 6 trains of the world’s largest LNG plant in Qatar. See Page 9,10 and 13 We place top priority on safety, targeting zero accidents and injuries. We pride ourselves on our excellent safety record. See Page 6 Courtesy of Qatargas Operating Company Limited Courtesy of Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Courtesy of ExxonMobil PNG Limited Courtesy of JSC Yamal LNG The World's Largest LNG Trains in Qatar Execution in the harsh environment in Sakhalin Island PNG LNG Project, Papua New Guinea Yamal LNG Project, Russia 1 2 Major Achievement Figure Chiyoda’s LNG Experience (Chronological) Chiyoda’s LNG Experience (Geographical) Mozambique FLNG Qatargas 2 Train 4&5 LNG Project Eni East Africa S.p.A. Qatargas 2 Ras Laffan, Qatar Cabo Delgado,Mozambique FEED/PS 7.8mtpa x 2 2004 FEED/PS 2.5 mtpa 2015 NLNGSevenPlus Project Mozambique LNG Project Ras Laffan, Qatar Yamal Peninsula, Qalhat, Oman Nigeria LNG Bonny Island, Nigeria Anadarko Mozambique Area 1, Limitada, Russia 8.5mtpa x 2 2006 Cabo Delgado, Mozambique ■ RasGas LNG Plant Project Train 1&2 ■ Oman LNG 3rd Train Expansion Project 6.0mtpa x 4 2015 RasGas 1995 Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 2001 Tangguh LNG Project North Field Expansion Project ■ Yamal LNG Project ■ RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 3&4 Oman LNG 3rd Train Expansion Project (PS Update) PERTAMINA Tangguh, Indonesia Browse LNG Development Qatar Petroleum Yamal LNG 2013 ■ RasGas 2000 Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 2002 3.5mtpa x 2 2001 Woodside Ras Laffan, Qatar Kitimat, British Columbia, James Price Point, Australia Qatargas 2 Train 4&5LNG Project 7.8mtpa x 4 2018 ■ Canada Egypt LNG Project 4.0 mtpa x 3 2012 Qatargas 2 2004 Union Fenosa Damietta, Egypt Sakhalin Island, Russia Arrow Energy LNG Project Train 1&2 ■ RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 5 5.0mtpa x 2 2001 ■ LNG Canada Project Shell Global Solutions International B.V. RasGas 2004 Sakhalin LNG Project Train 1&2 Gladstone, Australia ■ LNG Canada Development Inc. RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 6&7 Trinidad LNG Plant Project RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 5 4.0 mtpa x 2 2012 ■ Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 2001 (non-disclose) Atlantic LNG La Brea, Trinidad & Tobago RasGas Ras Laffan Qatar RasGas 2004 Sakhalin LNG Project Train 3 Petronas LNG Train 9 Project Das Island, U.A.E. ■ 3.0mtpa 1995 4.7mtpa 2004 Qatargas 3 Train 6&7LNG Project Petronas LNG 9 Sdn. Bhd Sarawak, Malaysia ■ Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 2016 Qatar Petroleum & Conocophillips Qatar Ltd. 2005 ■ ADGAS LNG Project Train 1&2 Nigeria LNG Project (PS Rewrite) RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 6&7 3.6 mtpa 2013 ■ North Field Expansion Project ADGAS 1972 Sabine Pass, Texas, Nigeria LNG Bonny Island, Nigeria RasGas Ras Laffan Qatar Yamal LNG Project NLNG Train7 Project Qatar Petroleum 2018 2.65mtpa 1994 7.8mtpa x 2 2004 Yamal LNG Yamal Peninsula, Russia Nigeria LNG Limited ■ ADGAS LNG Plant Expansion U.S.A. 5.5mtpa x 3 2013 Bonny Island, Nigeria Project Train 3 ADGAS LNG Plant Expansion Project Train 3 Oman LNG 3rd Train Expansion Project (PS Update) 4.0mtpa+4.0mtpa 2018 ADGAS 1991 ■ Golden Pass LNG ADGAS Das Island, U.A.E. Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Qalhat, Oman LNG Canada Project Export Project 2.5mtpa 1991 3.3mtpa 2002 LNG Canada Development Inc. Golden Pass Products, LLC Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada (non-disclose) RasGas LNG Expansion Project Train 3&4 6.0mtpa x 2 (+2(option)) (non-disclosure) RasGas Ras Laffan, Qatar Golden Pass LNG Export Project Damietta, Egypt Masela, Indonesia Tangguh, Indonesia 4.4mtpa x 2 2000 Golden Pass Products, LLC Abadi Floating LNG Project Tangguh LNG Project Qatargas 3 Train 6&7 LNG Project Sabine Pass, Texas, U.S.A. ■ Egypt LNG Project ■ ■ Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Qatar Petroleum & Conocophillips Qatar Ltd. 5.2mtpa x 3 (non-disclosure) Union Fenosa 2001 INPEX Masela 2014 PERTAMINA 2001 Ras Laffan, Qatar Tangguh Expansion Project Scarborough FLNG ■ ■ PNG LNG (APCI) Project 7.8mtpa x 2 2005 BP Berau Ltd 2016 Esso AustraliaScarborough, Australia Sarawak, Malaysia ExxonMobil 2009 RasGas LNG Plant Project Train 1&2 PNG LNG (APCI) Project 7.0 mtpa 2015 RasGas Ras Laffan, Qatar ExxonMobil ■Petronas LNG Train 9 Project La Brea, Trinidad & Tobago Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Bonny Island, Nigeria 2.5mtpa x 2 1995 Sakhalin LNG Project Train 3 Petronas LNG 9 Sdn. Bhd 2013 Gladstone, Australia 3.15mtpa x 2 2009 Shell Global Solutions International B.V. ■ Nigeria LNG Project (PS Rewrite) ■ Trinidad LNG Plant Project Sakhalin Island, Russia Bontang LNG Train-I Project Petrobras FLNG Project Nigeria LNG 1994 ■ Arrow Energy LNG Project Train 1&2 Atlantic LNG 1995 PERTAMINA Bontang, Indonesia Petrobras 4.8mtpa x 1 2016 ■ NLNGSevenPlus Project Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 2012 2.95mtpa 2001 Pre-Salt Cluster, Santos Basin, Scarborough, Australia Offshore Brazil Tangguh Expansion Project Nigeria LNG Limited 2006,2018 Oman LNG 3rd Train Expansion Project Darwin, Australia 2.7mtpa 2010 BP Berau Ltd. Tangguh, Indonesia ■ Scarborough FLNG Shell Global Solutions International B.V. 3.8mtpa 2016 Qalhat, Oman Cabo Delgado, Mozambique Esso Australia 2015 ■ Ichthys Gas Field Development Onshore Facilities 3.3mtpa 2001 Ichthys Gas Field Development Onshore Facilities INPEX Browse Ltd 2011 INPEX Browse Ltd Darwin, Australia ■ Mozambique LNG Project Pre-Salt Cluster, Santos Basin, ADGAS LNG Project Train 1&2 Sakhalin LNG Project Train 1&2 4.2mtpa x 2 2011 Anadarko Mozambique Area 1, Offshore Brazil ADGAS Das Island, U.A.E. Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Limitada 2015 Bontang, Indonesia James Price Point, Australia Sakhalin Island, Russia Abadi Floating LNG Project 1.1mtpa x 2 1972 Mozambique FLNG Project Petrobras FLNG Project 4.8mtpa x 2 2001 INPEX Masela Masela, Indonesia ■ ■ Bontang LNG Train-I Project ■ Browse LNG Development Facilities ■ 2.5mtpa 2014 Eni East Africa S.p.A. 2015 PERTAMINA 2001 Woodside 2012 Petrobras 2010 1972 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Ras Laffan, Qatar Sakhalin Island, Russia ADGAS LNG Project Train 1&2 Qatargas LNG Project Train 1&2 Qalhat LNG Project ADGAS Das Island, U.A.E. Qatargas Ras Laffan, Qatar Qalhat LNG Qalhat, Oman ■ Qatargas LNG Project Train 1&2 ■ RasGas 3 LNG Project Train 6 ■ Sakhalin LNG Project Train 1&2 1.1mtpa x 2 1976 2.0mtpa x 2 1996 3.3mtpa 2005 Qatargas 1996 RasGas 3 2009 Sakhalin Energy 2008 ■ Qatargas LNG Project Train 3 ■ RasGas 3 LNG Project Train 7 Arun LNG Project Train 4&5 Qatargas LNG Project Train 3 Sakhalin LNG Project Train 1&2 Yamal LNG Project Qatargas Ras Laffan, Qatar Qatargas 1998 RasGas 3 2009 PERTAMINA Arun, Indonesia Sakhalin Energy Sakhalin Island, Russia Yamal LNG, JSC Yamal Peninsula, Russia ■ Qatargas Debottlenecking Project ■ Qatargas 3 LNG Project Train 6 1.75mtpa x 2 1983 2.0mtpa 1998 4.8mtpa x 2 2008 5.5mtpa x 3 (Nameplate) Qatargas 2003, 2004, 2005 Qatargas 3 2010 Oman LNG Project Train 1&2 ■ RasGas LNG Onshore Expansion Project Train 3 ■ Qatargas 4 LNG Project Train 7 Freeport, Texas, U.S.A. Oman LNG Qalhat, Oman GNL-3Z Project Area1, Mozambique LNG Project RasGas II 2003 Qatargas 4 2010 3.3mtpa x 2 2000 Sonatrach Arzew, Algeria Anadarko Mozambique Area1. Ltda. ■ RasGas LNG Onshore Expansion Project Train 4 ■ Freeport LNG Export Project 4.7mtpa 2015 Cabo Delgado, Mozambique RasGas LNG Onshore Expansion Project Train 3 RasGas II 2005 FLNG Liquefaction, LLC (2020) 6.44mtpa x 2 (Ongoing) RasGas II Ras Laffan, Qatar ■ RasGas LNG Onshore Expansion Project Train 5 Yamal Peninsula, Russia 4.7mtpa 2003 PNG LNG Project RasGas II 2006 Sabine Pass, Texas, U.S.A.
Recommended publications
  • Sanctions Intelligence Update
    July 17, 2014 SANCTIONS INTELLIGENCE UPDATE GENNADY TIMCHENKO & VOLGA GROUP adapting BUSINESS FOLLOWING U.S. & Canadian sanctions Overview In March and April, the US government sanctioned Russian businessman Gennady Timchenko, his Luxembourg-registered holding company Volga Group, and ten related subsidiaries. Timchenko was identified as a “member of the Russian leadership’s inner circle,” whose involvement in the energy sector was “directly linked to [President] Putin.” To date, Canada has sanctioned Timchenko, Volga Group, and nine Volga Group subsidiaries. The European Union has not acted against Timchenko or Volga Group. Since the announcement of US and Canadian sanctions, Timchenko and Volga Group- controlled firms have announced new projects in Asia, Europe, and Syria with reported financing from Chinese and Russian banks, including institutions sanctioned by the US on July 16. Financial institutions engaged in global business should consider the implications for AML and sanctions risk management. Timchenko’s post-sanctionS business ventures in China In late April 2014, President Putin appointed Gennady Timchenko to lead the Russia-China Business Council (RCBC), a body created in 2004 to expand partnerships between the two countries. Timchenko told reporters after President Putin’s RCBC announcement: “You know what Putin said? He introduced me by As head of RCBC, Timchenko is advancing Volga Group interests in saying Mr. Timchenko is the head of our business council. In other China. words – it is my words here – he is our main man for China.” • In late May 2014, Volga Group is constructing a terminal for announced a joint-venture with coal and iron ore shipments in the state-owned China Harbour Russia’s Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18
    October 2018 LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 OIES PAPER: NG137 Brian Songhurst Research Associate, OIES The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2018 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN: 978-1-78467-120-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671204 i LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Acknowledgements My thanks to fellow OIES colleague Claudio-Steuer for his contributions during the drafting of this paper. My thanks also to the following industry colleagues for their review and comments on the draft: Toby Chancellor-Weale, Chair, IChemE Oil and Natural Gas Special Interest Group (SONG) Chris Spilsbury, LNG Specialists Ltd John Rushbrook, Consultant ii LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Preface In his recent papers for OIES on the future of gas in Europe and the global energy economy, Jonathan Stern identified affordability as a key factor in determining whether gas would play a major role in Non-OECD countries. As the majority of traded gas will be LNG, the key question is therefore whether the cost of developing new liquefaction projects can be low enough to allow the gas to be competitive when it reaches the end consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION 2007 ANNUAL REPORT THIRTY-SIXTH GENERAL MEETING DECEMBER 5th, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION 1 President’s Report 2 Treasurer’s Report 3 Communications Committee Report 4 Convention Committee Report 5 Data Management Committee Report 6 Downstream Committee Report 7 Environment & Safety Committee Report 8 Finance & Tax Committee Report 9 Human Resources Committee Report 10 Indonesian Crude Price (ICP) Committee Report 11 KRIS Committee Report 12 LNG & Gas Sales Committee Report 13 Professional Division Committee Report 14 Regulatory Affairs Committee Report 15 Security & Local Relations Committee Report 16 Service Companies Committee Report 17 University Assistance Committee Report 18 List of Companies & Associates SECTION 1 INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT’S REPORT - 2007 by Chris A. Prattini On behalf of IPA Board of Directors December 2007 www.ipa.or.id Page 1 of 16 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 IPA MEMBERSHIP AND OBJECTIVES 5 IPA PERFORMANCE AGAINST OBJECTIVES 6 GENERAL COMMENTARY 9 IN CONCLUSION 11 Page 2 of 16 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 HISTORICAL OIL & CONDENSATE PRODUCTION FIGURE 2 LIQUIDS PRODUCTION VS COMSUMPTION FIGURE 3 HISTORICAL INDONESIA LICENSE AWARDS FIGURE 4 – 9 2007 IPA OBJECTIVES FIGURE 10 HISTORICAL COST RECOVERY Page 3 of 16 INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION President’s Report for 2007 INTRODUCTION Throughout this year, much emphasis has been placed on the critical need to restore and sustain growth in oil and gas production volumes. Preliminary figures suggest that gas production will continue its historical growth trend with a forecasted 7% increase from 2006 and projections of sustained growth over the next 3 years. Gas reserves have also increased as a result of numerous discoveries in both producing and exploration PSCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices and Crisis – LNG and Australia's East Coast Gas Market
    March 2018 Prices and crisis: LNG and Australia’s East Coast gas market Introduction In 2017, a gas crisis emerged in Australia’s East Coast gas market. Gas prices had increased rapidly from mid-2016 as the full effect of the three LNG projects starting operations on Curtis Island worked through the gas market, putting domestic energy users under pressure. In March 2017, the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) forecast gas shortages in coming years, potentially leading to blackouts and industrial closures. While gas shortages are no longer forecast, challenges in the East Coast gas market remain. This paper examines recent events in Australia’s East Coast gas market, the challenges ahead, and the relevance of these developments for other countries.1 The paper identifies three phases in the East Coast gas market’s recent history. Firstly, between 2010 and mid-2016, prices in the East Coast gas market rose gradually, driven by LNG netbacks and the rising cost of gas production. Then, between mid-2016 and mid-2017, prices climbed above export parity levels, as gas that was previously being supplied to domestic consumers (both by LNG projects and by other producers) was diverted for export, leading to a deterioration in competition in the domestic market. Finally, as of mid-2017, prices appear to have stabilised around export parity levels,2 with LNG projects and other producers increasing gas sales to the domestic market. The episode of high prices during much of 2016 and 2017 highlights the impact that LNG projects can have on domestic gas prices on Australia’s East Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region
    Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies | Series 17 APEC Energy Working Group September 2020 APEC Project: EWG 01 2020S Produced by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Inui Building, Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] (administration) Website: http://aperc.or.jp/ For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-RE-01.9 ISBN: 978-981-14-7794-2 OGSS Series 17 Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region 3 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 Project coordinators .................................................................................................................. 7 Authors ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Editors
    [Show full text]
  • The Oman Liquefied Natural Gas Project L' Usine De
    THE OMAN LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS PROJECT L’ USINE DE LIQUEFACTION DE GAZ NATUREL D’ OMAN G.Searle General Manager and CEO M.J.J.Koekkoek Operations Manager Oman LNG, Qalhat Sultanate of Oman ABSTRACT Oman Liquefied Natural Gas L.L.C. (OLNG) is a limited liability incorporated joint venture Company organised, since 1994, under the Laws of the Sultanate of Oman. It engages in the business of producing and selling Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and by- product Natural Gas Liquids (NGL’s). The plant liquefies Natural gas using two identical process trains, with currently the single largest LNG production capacity of 3.3. mtpa in the world. Since the start in April 2000 the plant is now delivering LNG to Korea and Japan on a regular basis as well as spot cargoes to USA and Spain. The LNG plant has been successfully commissioned well within budget and on time due to the good collaboration between OLNG and its Contractors. Technically the plant is characterized by a very low specific capital cost, compared to other recent LNG projects. The paper describes the experience during engineering, construction and initial operation of the project characteristics that are new in the LNG industry and gives an overview of the key lessons learned. RESUME La societe Oman LNG LLC (OLNG) est une entreprise en coparticipation etablie en 1994 sous le regime du Sultanat d'Oman. Son activite premiere est la production et la commercialisation de Gaz Naturel Liquefie (GNL) et d'essence legere. L’ usine de GNL, comporte deux modules de liquefaction, chacun d’une capacite de 3,3 millions de tonnes par an qui sont actuellement les plus grands au monde de ce type.
    [Show full text]
  • Yamal Lng: Meeting the Challenges of Natural Gas Liquefaction in the Arctic
    YAMAL LNG: MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF NATURAL GAS LIQUEFACTION IN THE ARCTIC Christopher Ott1, Igor Chasnyk2, Sander Kaart2, Christian Bladanet3, Benoit Laflotte3, Guillaume Le-Ridant3, Benoit Delva3, and Oriano Zucchi4 1 3 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Yamgaz (TechnipFMC) 2 4 JSC Yamal LNG Baker Hughes, a GE Company The Yamal liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility is an integrated project located north of the arctic circle on the Yamal Peninsula in northern Russia. The project consists of three LNG trains that produce a total of 16.5 million tonnes per annum (mtpa), along with substantial infrastructure that includes extensive living accommodations, power generation utilities, an ice-free deep-water sea port, and an international airport. The geo-political context, project finance and the extraordinary human endeavor of a project of this size in the arctic were challenges rarely seen in the past. As this is the northern-most operating LNG facility in the world, this paper will cover the achievements of the project, including developing the largest Air Products AP-C3MR™ LNG Process train, constructing a highly modularized project in a harsh environment and successfully loading the first cargo during the polar winter night. This paper focuses on technological features that had to be carefully managed, for example: - Successfully implementing a new high availability, maximum capacity, parallel C3/MR compressor arrangement that required extensive collaboration between the main contractor, compressor supplier, plant operator, and process licensor to achieve the 5.5 mtpa capacity per train - Ethane and propane refrigerant make-up could be produced early due to the turbo-expander based NGL recovery unit - The commissioning and defrosting, under conditions where water exists only as a solid, also required adapting the warm climate methodology - Managing hydrates - Air cooling, in an environment with a very large winter-to-summer range (-40°C to +10°C) The paper will conclude by describing the successful operation and performance test of all three Yamal LNG trains.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Unlimited 17 November Layout 1
    LNG Unlimited LNG JOURNAL PUBLICATION 17 November 2020 French shipping line CMA CGM begins new era for European LNG bunkering UNLIMITED Marseille-based firm AGENDA starts fuel operations ENGINEERING in Rotterdam for its growing LNG-fueled fleet Japan’s JGC says LNG Canada is LNG News Editor progressing as other contracts expected The bunkering programme has started in the port of Rotterdam 2 for France-based container group CMA CGM with its first vessel, one PROJECTS of 26 the Marseilles shipping line has ordered, being refuelled after arriving on its maiden voyage from Dutch port will be main provider of LNG for container- Asia. The CMA CGM group pro- late head of CMA CGM after whom The bunkering vessel in the gramme to operate a new class of the newly-bunkered vessel is Rotterdam operation, the “Gas LNG-powered vessels is now well named. Agility”, is currently the largest in Kosmos venture for underway with the “CMA CGM “As well as being reliable, LNG the LNG fuel sector. CMA CGM has Mauritania-Senegal FLNG is advancing Jacques Saade” receiving fuel on is the best available technology a contract with French energy amid output boost November 12. for significantly improving air major Total for LNG bunkering for quality and contributing towards its container fleet. 3 Key role tackling global warming,” added The “Gas Agility” is owned The Port of Rotterdam will play Saadé. by Japanese shipping company CORPORATE a key role in refuelling the LNG- In November 2017, CMA CGM Mitsui OSK Lines and chartered Air Products reports powered fleet, which will operate made the decision to order the to Total.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas in Indonesia Investment and Taxation Guide
    Oil and Gas in Indonesia Investment and Taxation Guide September 2019, 10th Edition www.pwc.com/id This page and cover photo courtesy of: PT Medco Energi Internasional Tbk. DISCLAIMER: This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication and, to the extent permitted by law, KAP Tanudiredja, Wibisana, Rintis & Rekan, PT Prima Wahana Caraka, PT PricewaterhouseCoopers Indonesia Advisory, PT PricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting Indonesia, and Melli Darsa & Co., Advocates & Legal Consultants, its members, employees, and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility, or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance upon the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. Regulatory information is current to 31 July 2019. 1 Contents Glossary 4 Foreword 10 1 Industry Overview 12 2 Regulatory Framework 24 3 (Conventional) Upstream Sector 40 106 4 Gross Split PSCs 5 Downstream Sector 118 Service Providers 6 to the Upstream Sector 136 Appendices 142 About PwC | PwC Oil & Gas Contacts Insertion - Indonesian Oil & Gas Concessions and Major Infrastructure Map 147 Glossary Term Definition AFE Authorisation for Expenditure APBN Anggaran
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Gas
    UPSTREAM 17 SHELL INVESTORS’ HANDBOOK 2013 INTEGRATED GAS Strong growth in gas markets is a major opportunity The Repsol LNG portfolio acquisition in late 2013 LNG LEADERSHIP [A] for Shell. Our integrated gas earnings have is another growth leg for integrated gas, with new increased by around 400% since 2009 to some equity supply in South America, and new year-end mtpa $9 billion in 2013 or about 60% of Upstream trading opportunities. earnings. This was mainly driven by several large 40 liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas-to-liquids (GTL) LNG projects that came on-stream, including Pearl GTL, Shell is a pioneer of the LNG industry with expertise Pluto LNG Train 1 (Woodside), North Rankin based on 50 years of experience. Shell was 30 Redevelopment, Qatargas 4 and Sakhalin-2. instrumental in delivery of the world’s first LNG Integrated gas earnings incorporate LNG, including plant, in Algeria, which came on-stream in 1964. LNG marketing and trading, and GTL operations. In the years since, LNG has become a truly global 20 In addition, the associated upstream oil and gas commodity with demand expected to grow rapidly production activities from the Sakhalin-2, North in the coming years. Currently around 240 mpta, West Shelf, Pluto LNG Train 1 (Woodside), the global LNG market is expected to reach about 10 Qatargas 4 and Pearl GTL projects are included 430 mtpa by 2025. This growth will be driven by in integrated gas earnings. Power generation expanding economies in China, India and the and coal gasification activities are also part Middle East, by demand in Europe and by new 0 of integrated gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping LNG from a Remote Arctic Plant
    Shipping LNG from a Remote Arctic Plant Frederic Hannon LNG Shipping Project Manager TOTAL – Gas, Renewables & Power Division YAMAL LNG, a Pilot Project in the Arctic – Some Key Features Shareholders 9.9% 20.0% 50.1% Source: Public information 20.0% ● LNG Plant located in Sabetta, North-East Wells 208 directional and horizontal of the Yamal Peninsula, Russia Capacity 3 x 5.5 MMtpa + 1 x 0,94 MMtpa LNG, 1.2 MMtpa Condensates ● Arctic conditions (Temperatures -52°C / 3 months of polar night) Capex 27 G$ (Yamal LNG) ● Ice free port: 5 months Trains 1,2,3 started ( nameplate 16,5 Mmtpa) T4 pilot under Construction Status ● South Tambey Gas-Condensate Field: construction exploration and development license until 15 ARC7 LNG Carriers, 11 Conventional LNGCs , 2 ARC7 2045 Shipping Condensate tankers Trans-shipment capacity in Zeebrugge and Ship-to-Ship Transfers ● Reservoirs: 1000- 3500 m deep LNG Deliveries Asia, Europe ● Proved & Probable Reserves : 926 billion cubic meters of natural gas An Integrated Project : • Presidential decree on October 10th, 2010 • Final Investment Decision on December 13th, 2013 with Pioneering Solutions in field of logistics and transportation schemes : The Shipping Scheme for the Export of LNG Westbound : annual ice Eastbound : pluri-annual ice Average ice extension : 830 Nmiles / 2,900 Average ice extension 2,100 Nm / 4,900 Nm – 7/9 days Nm – 14/16 days Year Round Northern Sea Route Route Sabetta 16,5 mtpa LNG / Trans-shipment # 220 cargoes Terminal /year Summer Route TRANSHIPMENT : SHIP – STORAGE - SHIP Winter
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-2009 Financial and Operational Information
    FIVE-YEAR FACT BOOK Royal Dutch Shell plc FINaNcIAL aND OPERATIoNAL INFoRMATIoN 2005–2009 ABBREVIATIONS WE help meet ThE world’S growing demand for energy in Currencies € euro economically, environmentally £ pound sterling and socially responsible wayS. $ US dollar Units of measurement acre approximately 0.4 hectares or 4 square kilometres About This report b(/d) barrels (per day) bcf/d billion cubic feet per day This five-year fact book enables the reader to see our boe(/d) barrel of oil equivalent (per day); natural gas has financial and operational performance over varying been converted to oil equivalent using a factor of timescales – from 2005 to 2009, with every year in 5,800 scf per barrel between. Wherever possible, the facts and figures have dwt deadweight tonnes kboe/d thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day been made comparable. The information in this publication km kilometres is best understood in combination with the narrative km2 square kilometres contained in our Annual Report and Form 20-F 2009. m metres MM million Information from this and our other reports is available for MMBtu million British thermal unit online reading and downloading at: mtpa million tonnes per annum www.shell.com/annualreports mscm million standard cubic metres MW megawatts The webpages contain interactive chart generators, per day volumes are converted to a daily basis using a downloadable tables in Excel format, hyperlinks to other calendar year webpages and an enhanced search tool. Sections of the scf standard cubic feet reports can also be downloaded separately or combined tcf trillion cubic feet into a custom-made PDF file.
    [Show full text]