GIIGNL Annual Report Profile

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GIIGNL Annual Report Profile The LNG industry GIIGNL Annual Report Profile Acknowledgements Profile We wish to thank all member companies for their contribution to the report and the GIIGNL is a non-profit organisation whose objective following international experts for their is to promote the development of activities related to comments and suggestions: LNG: purchasing, importing, processing, transportation, • Cybele Henriquez – Cheniere Energy handling, regasification and its various uses. • Najla Jamoussi – Cheniere Energy • Callum Bennett – Clarksons The Group constitutes a forum for exchange of • Laurent Hamou – Elengy information and experience among its 88 members in • Jacques Rottenberg – Elengy order to enhance the safety, reliability, efficiency and • María Ángeles de Vicente – Enagás sustainability of LNG import activities and in particular • Paul-Emmanuel Decroës – Engie the operation of LNG import terminals. • Oliver Simpson – Excelerate Energy • Andy Flower – Flower LNG • Magnus Koren – Höegh LNG • Mariana Ortiz – Naturgy Energy Group • Birthe van Vliet – Shell • Mika Iseki – Tokyo Gas • Yohei Hukins – Tokyo Gas • Donna DeWick – Total • Emmanuelle Viton – Total • Xinyi Zhang – Total © GIIGNL - International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers All data and maps provided in this publication are for information purposes and shall be treated as indicative only. Under no circumstances shall they be regarded as data or maps intended for commercial use. Reproduction of the contents of this publication in any manner whatsoever is prohibited without prior consent of the copyright owners. Editorial The LNG industry in 2019 “LNG will continue to be a flexible, safe, reliable and cleaner energy source” Jean-Marie Dauger President Dear Colleagues, In 2019, the LNG market grew at a vigorous 13.0% rate, one hand, it continued to be boosted by China despite need to remain at levels that make gas competitive reaching 354.7 MT, an expansion followed by mounting the US-China trade frictions and the slowdown of the with alternative fuels in downstream power and gas uncertainties since the start of 2020. coal-to-gas switch in the industrial sector. On the other markets but, at the same time, support the significant hand LNG demand declined in Japan and South Korea, investments needed in production, liquefaction, trans- In the near term, the disruptive impact of the Covid-19 where increasing levels of nuclear power generation portation, transmission and downstream infrastructure. outbreak on the economies of importing countries will and the pace of renewables deployment influenced the A balance will have to be found, and in the end, the exert downward pressure on LNG demand in an already role of LNG in the power mix. In Europe, the absorption scale of new developments will depend on the industry’s oversupplied market. of surplus volumes was enabled by a combination of competitiveness, as well as on its ability to demonstrate lower pipeline imports, declining domestic production, its environmental benefits, in particular by increasing ef- 2019 marked an all-time record increase in annual LNG increased storage use and additional gas-fired power forts to detect, measure and reduce methane emissions. production, driven by new liquefaction trains and ramp- generation. Imports dwindled in the Middle East as Natural gas’s effective contribution in quickly improving ups in the United States, Russia and Australia. Over Egypt increased its exports. The same dynamic occur- air quality and curbing carbon emissions should be key the last three years, the industry has added more than red in South America as Argentina started LNG produc- in positioning LNG as an enduring part of the energy mix 80 MTPA of new capacity and significant volumes are tion and exports. and as a pragmatic and lower-carbon solution for the due to come online by 2025. Besides, 2019 was a re- future, while new gases will begin to take advantage of cord year for new investment decisions, which reached For LNG sellers and buyers, business models and the versatility of LNG infrastructure. 71 MTPA worldwide by the end of the year. contractual arrangements are becoming increasingly diversified. Traders continue to take advantage of sea- In 2019, LNG commercial operations passed the mark Global LNG flows experienced a shift in patterns: sonal and local supply tensions and integrated portfolio of 100,000 delivered cargoes without major incident, Northeast Asian demand growth moderated due to players are displaying impressive growth, aiming to showing an incredible track-record of safety. As we en- economic slowdown, milder weather and competi- bridge the disconnect between LNG seller and buyer in- ter a new decade and as GIIGNL is approaching its 50th tion from nuclear and coal-fired power generation, terests. We see competing interests, a world in which anniversary, our association remains committed to pro- while most of additional LNG volumes were absorbed sellers require long-term commitments to support their moting cooperation between LNG players and to sup- into Europe which played a balancing role thanks to investments, whereas buyers need shorter contract porting the development of safe, efficient and sustai- its abundant infrastructure and well-connected gas durations, diversified pricing structures, increased des- nable LNG imports for a responsible energy transition. market. tination flexibility and greater volume flexibility in order to manage demand uncertainty. Yours sincerely, On the demand side, no new country joined the ranks of importers in 2019 but several countries made sound Looking further ahead, LNG will continue to be a Jean-Marie Dauger progress on infrastructure development and are set to flexible, safe, reliable and cleaner energy source to President begin importing in the coming years. In Asia, demand meet ever more flexible and climate-conscious demand. was characterized by two diverging trends: on the To allow natural gas to penetrate new markets, prices GIIGNL Annual Report 2020 Edition - 3 Key figures 2019 Key figures 2019 354.7 MT +13% imported vs. 313.8 MT in 2018 growth vs. 2018 new LNG 21 42 regasification exporting importing 7 terminals countries countries of global LNG MTPA demand in Asia 920 69% total regasification capacity of global LNG volumes MTPA supplied from the 427 41% Pacific Basin total liquefaction capacity 4 - GIIGNL Annual Report 2020 Edition Key figures 2019 119 MT imported on a spot or short-term basis or 34% 34% of total trade Contents Key Figures 4 LNG trade in 2019 6 Contracts concluded in 2019 8 Medium-term and long-term contracts in force in 2019 10 LNG shipping 18 LNG imports in 2019 30 Liquefaction plants 38 Regasification terminals 44 World LNG Maps 54 Retail LNG in 2019 58 About GIIGNL 59 GIIGNL Annual Report 2020 Edition - 5 LNG trade in 2019 LNG trade in 2019 In 2019, global LNG imports Strongest LNG supply growth since by 3.2% in 2019 to 246.2 MT, rising in all countries reached 354.7 million tons 2010 thanks to the Atlantic Basin except in the established importing countries of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Even though (MT), increasing by 40.9 MT As in 2018, new LNG supply volumes were mostly Japanese LNG imports declined by 6.8% in 2019 or 13.0% compared to the driven by new production from the United States compared to 2018, Japan remains the leading impor- (+13.1 MT), Russia (+11 MT) and Australia (+8.7 MT). ting country with 76.9 MT or a 21.7% market share. previous year, the strongest Most exporting countries experienced an increase The main reasons for declining LNG imports in Japan growth rate since 2010. in their supply exports, except for three countries: were a slowdown of economic growth, the restart of Indonesia (-2.7 MT), Equatorial Guinea (-0.7 MT) several nuclear power units and mild temperatures. Argentina exported its first due to feed gas issues and Norway (-0.5 MT) due to Like Japan, South Korea also experienced a decline LNG cargo from the Tango maintenance requirements. in LNG imports, from 44 MT in 2019 to 40.1 MT, 5 new large-scale liquefaction projects started com- remaining the third largest LNG importer in the FLNG small-scale facility in mercial operations in 2019: 4 onshore in the United world and accounting for 11.3% of global market June 2019, increasing the States (Cameron LNG Train 1, Corpus Christi LNG, share. The main reasons for the decline were better Freeport LNG Train 1 and Elba Island) and 1 FLNG in nuclear generation performance, mild weather and number of exporting coun- Australia (Prelude FLNG). In addition, 2 small-scale high inventories at the beginning of the year. tries to 21*. liquefaction plants started-up exports: 1 onshore in In 2019, China experienced continued growth of LNG Russia (Vysotsk LNG) and 1 floating unit in Argentina imports, although at a slower pace (+14% compared The number of importing coun- (Tango FLNG). with +38% in 2018) but the country remains the tries remained unchanged, The Pacific Basin remains the largest source of LNG second largest LNG importer globally, with 61.7 MT supplies to the global market with 146.7 MT or or a 17.4% market share (similar to the market ** at 42 . 41.3% of the total global market, followed by the share of 2018). In China, the main reasons for the Atlantic Basin (32.2%) and the Middle East (26.5%). slowdown of year-on-year growth of LNG imports Due to the increase in production from Australia, the were the moderating economic growth rate, general gap between supply from the Pacific Basin and the easing of coal-to-gas switching efforts, acceleration Middle East has widened, from 45 MT in 2018 to of domestic production, as well as the rising share almost 53 MT in 2019. of renewables. The Atlantic Basin was the region contributing the In other Asian countries, LNG consumption conti- most to incremental volumes (+30 MT or almost nued to grow strongly: in Bangladesh, imports three quarters of new volumes).
Recommended publications
  • Highlights of Qatar; Places to Visit, Things to Do, Where to Eat?
    Highlights of Qatar; Places to visit, things to do, where to eat? There are a number of attractions and activities within easy reach of the Marriott Marquis Hotel: we are highlighting some here for your convenience. During the conference, you may also ask our volunteers who will be around to make your visit most memorable. Looking forward to welcoming you in Qatar, Ilham Al-Qaradawi; 9ICI Chair Hotspots and Highlights Doha Corniche (10 minutes) A seven-kilometre long waterfront promenade around Doha Bay, the Corniche offers spectacular views of the city, from the dramatic high-rise towers of the central business district to the bold shapes of the Museum of Islamic Art. Traditional wooden dhows lining the Bay evoke echoes of Qatar’s great seafaring past. The Corniche provides a green, vehicle-free pedestrian space in the heart of the capital. Katara (10 minutes) An innovative interpretation of the region’s architectural heritage, this purpose- built development’s impressive theatres, galleries and performance venues stage a lively year-round programme of concerts, shows and exhibitions. Among Katara’s recreational attractions are a wide choice of dining options, including top class restaurants offering a variety of cuisines, and a spacious, well- maintained public beach with water sports. The Pearl (10 minutes) The Pearl-Qatar is a man-made island off the West Bay coast featuring Mediterranean-style yacht-lined marinas, residential towers, villas and hotels, as well as luxury shopping at top brand name boutiques and showrooms. A popular dining spot, its waterfront promenades are lined with cafes and restaurants serving every taste – from a refreshing ice cream to a five-star dining experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekofish Kiest Voor Pon Power En EST-Floattech
    DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2018 – 328 Number 328 *** COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS *** Saturday 24-11-2018 News reports received from readers and Internet News articles copied from various news sites. 2 EGS technicians working back deck onboard the Research Vessel (RV) “Northern Endeavour” off the Kolombangara volcano, 20th November 2018. Both EGS technicians are from Cebu City, Philippines as is many of the crew, and are involved in a large and thus far successful geophysical and geotechnical campaign for fibre optic cable lay 5Distribution : daily to 40.750+ active addresses 24-11-2018 Page 1 DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2018 – 328 Your feedback is important to me so please drop me an email if you have any photos / articles that may be of interest to the maritime interested people at sea and ashore PLEASE SEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE / PHOTOS / ARTICLES TO : [email protected] this above email address is monitored 24/7 PLEASE DONT CLICK ON REPLY AS THE NEWSLETTER IS SENt OUT FROM AN UNMANNED SERVER If you don't like to receive this bulletin anymore : please send an e-mail to the above e- mail adress for prompt action your e-mail adress will be deleted ASAP from the server EVENTS, INCIDENTS & OPERATIONS The splendid MARCO POLO last week in Trondheim, Norway Photo : John Spedding (c) China to build its first cruise liner By : Li Xinran Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co is to build the nation’s first cruise liner following an agreement between parent company China State Shipbuilding Corp, US-based Carnival Corp and Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Update: Frozen 3? Keeping an Eye on Budgeting Process For
    December 5, 2019 Export Infrastructure Michael Webber, CFA Export Infrastructure 646-993-0693 LNG Update: Frozen 3? Keeping An Eye [email protected] Export Infrastructure On Budgeting Process For Arctic 2 Greg Wasikowski, CFA Funding Hot Potato May Be A Drag On Operational Timeline 646-993-0694 [email protected] Who Picks Up The Check For Arctic 2? The timeline for Novatek’s high-profile Arctic Export Infrastructure LNG 2 (19.8mpta) may have hit a modest speedbump, as the ~$1.9BN request to help Chris Tsung, CFA 646-998-8290 finance critical aspects of Arctic 2 [the Utrenneye LNG terminal on Gydan peninsula (page [email protected] 4), and reloading terminals in Murmansk (for European cargoes) and Kamchatka (for Asia cargoes)] are absent from Russia’s 2020 draft budget. While the project has Use already reached a positive FID, and is clearly a national priority – we think it’s worth watching whether any squabble over the ultimate funding source ends up delaying its operational timeline (which is already ambitious). The primary options appeared to be (1) the state budget (absent), or (2) funding from the ~$124B National Wealth Fund, which appears to be a more complicated and competitive process (below). Considering that Arctic 2 is being used as a fulcrum to revitalize/create local content industries - For including the Zvvezda shipyard for the required LNG carriers (Arc-7s or similar - which cost ~$350MM each in Korea) and some local fabrication of key equipment, we ultimately expect continued sovereign support. However, given narrower pricing/economics and (potentially) some budgeting hot-potato, we think its worth watching the Arctic 2 operational timeline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journey Continues
    The Magazine of Volume 67 Moran Towing Corporation November 2020 The J our ney Continu es In Moran’s New Training Programs, Boots, Books, and Technology Redouble a Shared Vision of Safety PHOTO CREDITS Page 25 (inset) : Moran archives Cover: John Snyder, Pages 26 –27, both photos: marinemedia.biz Will Van Dorp Inside Front Cover: Pages 28 –29: Marcin Kocoj Moran archives Page 30: John Snyder, Page 2: Moran archives ( Fort marinemedia.biz Bragg ONE Stork ); Jeff Thoresen ( ); Page 31 (top): Dave Byrnes Barry Champagne, courtesy of Chamber of Shipping of America Page 31 (bottom): John Snyder, (CSA Environmental Achievement marinemedia.biz Awards) Pages 32 –33: John Snyder, Page 3 : Moran archives marinemedia.biz Pages 5 and 7 –13: John Snyder, Pages 3 6–37, all photos: Moran marinemedia.biz archives Page 15 –17: Moran archives Page 39, all photos: John Snyder, marinemedia.biz Page 19: MER archives Page 40: John Snyder, Page 20 –22: John Snyder, marinemedia.biz marinemedia.biz; Norfolk skyline photo by shutterstock.com Page 41: Moran archives Page 23, all photos: Pages 42 and 43: Moran archives Will Van Dorp Inside Back Cover: Moran Pages 24 –25: Stephen Morton, archives www.stephenmorton.com The Magazine of Volume 67 Moran Towing Corporation November 2020 2 News Briefs Books 34 Queen Mary 2: The Greatest Ocean Liner of Our Time , by John Maxtone- Cover Story Graham 4 The Journey Continues Published by Moran’s New Training Programs Moran Towing Corporation Redouble a Shared Vision of Safety The History Pages 36 Photographic gems from the EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Grandone family collection Mark Schnapper Operations REPORTER John Snyder 14 Moran’s Wellness Program Offers Health Coaching Milestones DESIGN DIRECTOR Mark Schnapper 18 Amid Continued Growth, MER Is 38 The christenings of four new high- Now a Wholly Owned Moran horsepower escort tugs Subsidiary People Moran Towing Corporation Ship Call Miles tones 40 50 Locust Avenue Capt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Wave of Chinese Lng Importers
    THE NEXT WAVE OF CHINESE LNG IMPORTERS Jenny Yang Xizhou Zhou (Presenter) Director, IHS Markit Greater China Power, Gas, Coal, and Renewables Managing Director, IHS Markit Many new and potential LNG importers have emerged in China, thanks to a combination of policy support and market fundamentals. Together, these new players present an important new source of LNG demand in the global market and significant opportunities for suppliers. However, further reforms are needed to transform the current market structure and remove obstacles for these new players. What are the challenges facing new LNG importers? What is being done to release their full potential? How will international suppliers get familiar with them? Jenny Yang, IHS Markit Key implications1 Chinese government policies allowing more players in wholesale natural gas supply had and will continue to affect the global LNG market. The country’s three national oil companies (NOCs) have traditionally monopolized China’s gas importing business, but this has changed. The Chinese non-NOCs have been increasingly active in LNG importing activities. Several non-NOCs have procured new LNG supply agreements and successfully imported cargoes. Many more companies are building or proposing new LNG receiving terminals. Together, China’s non-NOCs will provide significant opportunities for suppliers. These companies vary from large end-users and citygas distributors seeking to minimize their gas procurement costs to energy companies looking for new market opportunities. However, China will need to carry out further reforms to remove obstacles for these new players. Allowing midstream access, removing barriers to downstream gas market, and reducing pricing regulations are critical steps toward realizing the full potential of China’s domestic natural gas industry.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18
    October 2018 LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 OIES PAPER: NG137 Brian Songhurst Research Associate, OIES The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2018 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN: 978-1-78467-120-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671204 i LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Acknowledgements My thanks to fellow OIES colleague Claudio-Steuer for his contributions during the drafting of this paper. My thanks also to the following industry colleagues for their review and comments on the draft: Toby Chancellor-Weale, Chair, IChemE Oil and Natural Gas Special Interest Group (SONG) Chris Spilsbury, LNG Specialists Ltd John Rushbrook, Consultant ii LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Preface In his recent papers for OIES on the future of gas in Europe and the global energy economy, Jonathan Stern identified affordability as a key factor in determining whether gas would play a major role in Non-OECD countries. As the majority of traded gas will be LNG, the key question is therefore whether the cost of developing new liquefaction projects can be low enough to allow the gas to be competitive when it reaches the end consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION 2007 ANNUAL REPORT THIRTY-SIXTH GENERAL MEETING DECEMBER 5th, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION 1 President’s Report 2 Treasurer’s Report 3 Communications Committee Report 4 Convention Committee Report 5 Data Management Committee Report 6 Downstream Committee Report 7 Environment & Safety Committee Report 8 Finance & Tax Committee Report 9 Human Resources Committee Report 10 Indonesian Crude Price (ICP) Committee Report 11 KRIS Committee Report 12 LNG & Gas Sales Committee Report 13 Professional Division Committee Report 14 Regulatory Affairs Committee Report 15 Security & Local Relations Committee Report 16 Service Companies Committee Report 17 University Assistance Committee Report 18 List of Companies & Associates SECTION 1 INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT’S REPORT - 2007 by Chris A. Prattini On behalf of IPA Board of Directors December 2007 www.ipa.or.id Page 1 of 16 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 4 IPA MEMBERSHIP AND OBJECTIVES 5 IPA PERFORMANCE AGAINST OBJECTIVES 6 GENERAL COMMENTARY 9 IN CONCLUSION 11 Page 2 of 16 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 HISTORICAL OIL & CONDENSATE PRODUCTION FIGURE 2 LIQUIDS PRODUCTION VS COMSUMPTION FIGURE 3 HISTORICAL INDONESIA LICENSE AWARDS FIGURE 4 – 9 2007 IPA OBJECTIVES FIGURE 10 HISTORICAL COST RECOVERY Page 3 of 16 INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION President’s Report for 2007 INTRODUCTION Throughout this year, much emphasis has been placed on the critical need to restore and sustain growth in oil and gas production volumes. Preliminary figures suggest that gas production will continue its historical growth trend with a forecasted 7% increase from 2006 and projections of sustained growth over the next 3 years. Gas reserves have also increased as a result of numerous discoveries in both producing and exploration PSCs.
    [Show full text]
  • GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3Rd Edition
    1 2 GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin 2019 3rd edition Authors and Contributors Namely in Alphabetical Order Amira Remadna Data Analysis and Research Diana Cueto ICT and Software Support Katrien Hermans Public Relations and Marketing Maria Arteaga Graphic Design & Administrative Support Mohamed Arafat Data Engineering and Curation Mona Shokripour, PhD Data Modelling and Integration Rixio Morales, PhD ICT Solutions Architect and Maintenance Roberto Arenas Lara, PhD Team Leader 3 Disclaimer The GECF Annual Statistical Bulletin (ASB) 2019 is the result of the data gathering collection and processing obtained directly from GECF Member and Observer Countries through the GECF Data Exchange Mechanism and in part using processed data from secondary sources examined and analysed by GECF Secretariat. The data contained in the GECF ASB 2019 are for information purposes only and do not necessary reflect the views of GECF Member and Observer Countries. Neither GECF Secretariat nor any of GECF Member and Observer Countries nor any of their agents or their employees are liable for any errors in or omissions from such information and materials and does not assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy completeness or reasonableness of data. Unless copyrighted by a third party, the information presented in the GECF ASB 2019 may be used and/or reproduced for research educational and other non-commercial purposes without GECF Secretariat’s prior written permission provided, fully acknowledging GECF as the copyright holder. Written permission from GECF Secretariat is required for any commercial use. The GECF ASB 2019 contains references to materials from third parties. GECF Secretariat will not be responsible for any unauthorized use of third party materials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weakest Link: the Consistent Refusal to Consider Far-Removed Indirect Effects of the Expansion of Lng Terminals
    RHODES FINAL 11/16/17 THE WEAKEST LINK: THE CONSISTENT REFUSAL TO CONSIDER FAR-REMOVED INDIRECT EFFECTS OF THE EXPANSION OF LNG TERMINALS Synopsis: The D.C. Circuit has recently ruled on numerous cases challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of the expansion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals to allow both export and import activity. Much of its analysis has focused on the delegation of authority between the De- partment of Energy (DOE) and FERC under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). Envi- ronmental groups raised challenges to the Environmental Assessment (EA) com- pleted by FERC in each case, arguing that FERC failed to adequately consider direct and indirect effects of the expansion. The indirect effects would arise via a chain of events ultimately depending on the increased production and consump- tion of LNG. In each case, the Court has pointed out that FERC only has authority to regulate the expansion of the facilities themselves. Without approval by the DOE to allow the additional import or export at the individual terminal at issue, FERC’s approval can cause no indirect effects. Moreover, the Court has reiterated multiple times that since FERC’s approval does not cause these indirect effects, but the DOE’s approval does, these suits should have been brought against the DOE. In this note, I discuss one of these cases, EarthReports v. FERC, at length, as well as incorporate portions of other similar cases to come to an understanding regarding what steps potential challengers to similar approvals should take. If challengers hope to convince a court, particularly the D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Side of Migration: Spotlight on Qatar's Construction Sector Ahead of the World Cup
    THE DARK SIDE OF MIGRATION: SPOTLIGHT ON QATAR'S CONSTRUCTION SECTOR AHEAD OF THE WORLD CUP Amnesty International Publications First published in 2013 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2013 Index: MDE 22/010/2013 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom [ISBN:] [ISSN:] All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Doha skyline © Lubaib Gazir Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 1 Neste 57.4 / 100 8.1 / 20 B 2 Engie 56.9 / 100 7.9 / 20 B 3 Naturgy Energy 44.8 / 100 6.8 / 20 C 4 Eni 43.6 / 100 7.3 / 20 C 5 bp 42.9 / 100 6.0 / 20 C 6 Total 40.7 / 100 6.1 / 20 C 7 Repsol 38.1 / 100 5.0 / 20 C 8 Equinor 37.9 / 100 4.9 / 20 C 9 Galp Energia 36.4 / 100 4.3 / 20 C 10 Royal Dutch Shell 34.3 / 100 3.4 / 20 C 11 ENEOS Holdings 32.4 / 100 2.6 / 20 C 12 Origin Energy 29.3 / 100 7.3 / 20 D 13 Marathon Petroleum Corporation 24.8 / 100 4.4 / 20 D 14 BHP Group 22.1 / 100 4.3 / 20 D 15 Hellenic Petroleum 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D 15 OMV 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 17 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt 20.2 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 18 Ampol Limited 18.8 / 100 0.9 / 20 D 19 SK Innovation 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 19 YPF 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 21 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA) 17.9 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 22 CPC Corporation, Taiwan 17.6 / 100 2.4 / 20 D 23 Ecopetrol 17.4 / 100 2.3 / 20 D 24 Formosa Petrochemical Corp 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 24 Cosmo Energy Holdings 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 26 California Resources Corporation 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 26 Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen) 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 28 Reliance Industries 16.7 / 100 1.0 / 20 D 29 Bharat Petroleum Corporation 16.0 / 100 1.7 / 20 D 30 Santos 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 30 Inpex 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 32 Saras 15.2 / 100 1.4 / 20 D 33 Qatar Petroleum 14.5 / 100 1.1 / 20 D 34 Varo Energy 12.4 / 100
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Imports and Exports Second Quarter Report 2019
    DOE/FE- 0615 Natural Gas Imports and Exports Second Quarter Report 2019 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Regulation, Analysis, and Engagement Division of Natural Gas Regulation Map shows the Exports of Domestically-Produced LNG Delievered by Vessel. (Cumulative starting from February 2016 through June 2019.) NATURAL GAS IMPORTS AND EXPORTS SECOND QUARTER REPORT 2019 Division of Natural Gas Regulation Office of Regulation, Analysis, and Engagement Office of Oil & Natural Gas Office of Fossil Energy U.S. Department of Energy 202-586-7991 [email protected] Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................... 1 1 Quarterly Summary ...................................................................... 3 Maps of Imports & Exports by Point of Entry/Exit ........................................ 5 Graphical Summaries & Comparisons ............................................................ 11 Tabular Summaries & Comparisons ............................................................... 23 1a Quarter in Review ........................................................................................................................ 25 1b All Import/Export Activities YTD 2019 vs. YTD 2018 ........................................................... 26 1c All Import/Export Activities 1st Quarter 2019 vs. 4th Quarter 2018 ...................................... 27 1d All Import/Export Activities 1st Quarter 2019 vs. 1st Quarter 2018 .....................................
    [Show full text]