Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing National Defense Authorization Act For i [H.A.S.C. No. 113–83] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2015 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUESTS FROM THE U.S. PACIFIC COMMAND, U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND, AND U.S. AFRICA COMMAND HEARING HELD MARCH 5, 2014 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 87–615 WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California, Chairman MAC THORNBERRY, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina LORETTA SANCHEZ, California J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina JEFF MILLER, Florida ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania JOE WILSON, South Carolina SUSAN A. DAVIS, California FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island ROB BISHOP, Utah RICK LARSEN, Washington MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee JOHN KLINE, Minnesota MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut TRENT FRANKS, Arizona DAVID LOEBSACK, Iowa BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JOHN GARAMENDI, California DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia COLLEEN W. HANABUSA, Hawaii DUNCAN HUNTER, California JACKIE SPEIER, California JOHN FLEMING, Louisiana RON BARBER, Arizona MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York DANIEL B. MAFFEI, New York VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri DEREK KILMER, Washington JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JON RUNYAN, New Jersey TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia SCOTT H. PETERS, California STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi WILLIAM L. ENYART, Illinois MO BROOKS, Alabama PETE P. GALLEGO, Texas RICHARD B. NUGENT, Florida MARC A. VEASEY, Texas KRISTI L. NOEM, South Dakota PAUL COOK, California JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio JACKIE WALORSKI, Indiana BRADLEY BYRNE, Alabama ROBERT L. SIMMONS II, Staff Director ALEX GALLO, Professional Staff Member MIKE CASEY, Professional Staff Member AARON FALK, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2014 Page HEARING: Wednesday, March 5, 2014, Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Budget Requests from the U.S. Pacific Command, U.S. Central Command, and U.S. Africa Command ................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 ..................................................................................... 47 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 2014 FISCAL YEAR 2015 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUESTS FROM THE U.S. PACIFIC COMMAND, U.S. CENTRAL COM- MAND, AND U.S. AFRICA COMMAND STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS McKeon, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck,’’ a Representative from California, Chair- man, Committee on Armed Services .................................................................. 1 Smith, Hon. Adam, a Representative from Washington, Ranking Member, Committee on Armed Services ............................................................................ 2 WITNESSES Austin, GEN Lloyd J., III, USA, Commander, U.S. Central Command ............. 5 Locklear, ADM Samuel J., USN, Commander, U.S. Pacific Command .............. 4 Rodriguez, GEN David M., USA, Commander, U.S. Africa Command ............... 7 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS: Austin, GEN Lloyd J., III ................................................................................ 82 Locklear, ADM Samuel J. ................................................................................ 56 McKeon, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ .................................................................... 51 Rodriguez, GEN David M. ............................................................................... 129 Smith, Hon. Adam ............................................................................................ 53 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD: [There were no Documents submitted.] WITNESS RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED DURING THE HEARING: Mrs. Davis ......................................................................................................... 147 Mr. Turner ........................................................................................................ 147 QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING: Ms. Duckworth .................................................................................................. 155 Mr. Lamborn ..................................................................................................... 154 Mr. LoBiondo .................................................................................................... 153 Mr. McKeon ....................................................................................................... 151 Mr. Shuster ....................................................................................................... 153 Ms. Speier ......................................................................................................... 154 (III) IV Page QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING—Continued Ms. Tsongas ...................................................................................................... 153 Mrs. Walorski ................................................................................................... 155 FISCAL YEAR 2015 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZA- TION BUDGET REQUESTS FROM THE U.S. PACIFIC COMMAND, U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND, AND U.S. AFRICA COMMAND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC, Wednesday, March 5, 2014. The committee met, pursuant to call, at 10:03 a.m., in room 2118, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon (chairman of the committee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, A REPRESENTATIVE FROM CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN, COM- MITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. The committee meets today to receive testimony on the fiscal year 2015 National Defense Au- thorization budget request for the U.S. Pacific Command, U.S. Cen- tral Command, U.S. Africa Command. Joining us today are Admiral Samuel Locklear, General Lloyd Austin, and General David Rodriguez. Thank you for being with us. Admiral Locklear, thank you for adapting your schedule to ac- commodate the Mid-Atlantic snow and ice. He is not here, but one of my good friends that sits on this com- mittee from Minnesota told me he was for global warming now. They have had 50 days below zero this winter. The scope of this hearing is immense and it is doubtful that we will address all of the important issues we have here today, so I encourage members to submit questions for the record. However, I do think the composite views of these three com- manders provides an interesting and interactive opportunity to dis- cuss the changing strategic environment, the global demand for forces, the implications of budget cuts and force reductions and risk among the commands. Today’s hearing is a study in contrast. The crisis unfolding in Ukraine is a sobering reminder that military strength, presence, and staying power in the world still matter. And just yesterday, we received a budget request and new de- fense strategy that continues to cut our military strength and re- duces our ability to respond to crises around the world. The President’s assumption that the tide of war is receding and that we can safely reduce American hard power in favor of soft power to assure our national security lies in stark contrast to re- ality. The majority of our vexing security challenges emanate from your three regions of the world: deterring an increasingly assertive (1) 2 China; preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons; denying Al Qaeda and its affiliates safe havens in Afghanistan and elsewhere to launch attacks against us and our allies; and stemming the vio- lence and instability in the Middle East and North Africa within the context of the Arab Awakening. These actors and others are surely watching how the United States responds to Russian aggression and some might be emboldened to further test U.S. resolve. Our allies and partners are also closely watching. But in con- trast, they worry about U.S. disengagement and the staying power of U.S. security agreements. The administration has committed to a rebalance to the Asia- Pacific while also sustaining a heightened alert posture in the Mid- dle East and North Africa. How well are we doing both? A declining defense budget, reduc- tion in troop strength and force structure, and diminished readi- ness, suggests that we can’t do both; or if we do, we do so at an increased risk to our forces and their missions. Nevertheless, the Department’s new defense strategy and budget request take us down this path. I hope you can provide us with your best military judgment on the advisability of such an ap- proach; how the strategy and budget reflect your mission require- ments; and the implications for your command’s force structure and needed capabilities. This is a challenging time and we appreciate the leadership
Recommended publications
  • An Ally at the Crossroads: Thailand in the US Alliance System Kitti Prasirtsuk
    8 An Ally at the Crossroads: Thailand in the US Alliance System Kitti Prasirtsuk In the second decade of the 21st century, the United States is increasingly finding itself in a difficult situation on several fronts. The economic turbulence ushered in by the Subprime Crisis of 2008 led to long-term adverse effects on the US economy. This economic crisis has signified the relative decline of Western supremacy, as the economic difficulties have been lengthy and particularly spread to the Eurozone, the recovery of which is even more delayed than that of the United States. In terms of security, the War on Terror turned out to be a formidable threat, as demonstrated in the form of extremist terrorism wrought under the banner of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which is now involving more people and is spreading beyond the Middle East. Europe’s immigrant crisis is also giving the West a headache. The rise of China insists that the United States has to recalibrate its strategy in managing allies and partner countries in East Asia. The ‘pivot’, or rebalancing, towards Asia, as framed under the US administration of Barack Obama since 2011, is a case in point. While tensions originating from the Cold War remain a rationale to keep US alliances intact in North-East Asia, this is less the case in South-East Asia, particularly in Thailand and the Philippines, both of which are traditional US allies. While American troops have remained in both Japan and Korea, they withdrew from the Philippines in 1992. The withdrawal from Thailand happened in 1976 following the end of the Vietnam War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thickening Web of Asian Security Cooperation: Deepening Defense
    The Thickening Web of Asian Security Cooperation Deepening Defense Ties Among U.S. Allies and Partners in the Indo-Pacific Scott W. Harold, Derek Grossman, Brian Harding, Jeffrey W. Hornung, Gregory Poling, Jeffrey Smith, Meagan L. Smith C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3125 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0333-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photo by Japan Maritime Self Defense Force. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Since the turn of the century, an important trend toward new or expanded defense cooperation among U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand: Background and U.S
    Thailand: Background and U.S. Relations Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs February 8, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32593 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Thailand: Background and U.S. Relations Summary U.S.-Thailand relations are of interest to Congress because of Thailand’s status as a long-time military ally and a significant trade and economic partner. However, ties have been complicated by deep political and economic instability in the wake of the September 2006 coup that displaced Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. After December 2007 parliamentary elections returned many of Thaksin’s supporters to power, the U.S. government lifted the restrictions on aid imposed after the coup and worked to restore bilateral ties. Meanwhile, street demonstrations rocked Bangkok and two prime ministers from Thaksin-aligned parties were forced to step down because of court decisions. A coalition of anti-Thaksin politicians headed by Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva assumed power in December 2008. Bangkok temporarily stabilized, but again erupted into open conflict between the security forces and anti-government protestors in March 2010. By May, the conflict escalated into the worst violence in Bangkok and other cities in decades. Although the government has remained in place, parliamentary elections are required by the end of 2011 and threaten to again spark conflict within a deeply divided society. With this uncertainty, many questions remain on how U.S. relations will fare as Bangkok seeks some degree of political stability. Despite differences on Burma policy and human rights issues, shared economic and security interests have long provided the basis for U.S.-Thai cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepening Interoperability a Proposal for a Combined Allied Expeditionary Strike Group Within the Indo-Pacific Region by Capt Eli J
    IDEAS & ISSUES (CHASE PRIZE ESSAYS) 2019 MajGen Harold W. Chase Prize Essay Contest: First Place Deepening Interoperability A proposal for a combined allied expeditionary strike group within the Indo-Pacific region by Capt Eli J. Morales o restore readiness and en- 40,000 gallons of water from a nearby 1 hance interoperability, co- >Capt Morales is an Instructor at the supply ship. alition partners and allies MAGTF Intelligence Officer Course, Currently, the Navy and Marine Corps in the Indo-Pacific region Marine Detachment, Dam Neck, VA. are faced with a choice to maintain Tmust assemble and deploy an expedi- current levels of forward naval pres- tionary strike group (ESG) built from ence and risk breaking its amphibious the capabilities and resources of each deployment and miss Exercise COBRA force, or reduce its presence and restore coalition partner and ally. The high op- GOLD. On a separate occasion, readiness through adequate training, 2 erational tempo of the last decade has after being ordered to respond to the upgrades, and maintenance. What resulted in deferred maintenance and 2010 Haitian earthquake just one has not changed over the last decade is reduced readiness for Navy and Marine month following a seven month de- the need for Navy and Marine Corps Corps units. In 2012, after the USS ployment, the USS Bataan (LHD-5) units to establish and maintain capable Essex (LHD-2) skipped maintenance suffered a double failure of its evapora- alliances and partnerships within the to satisfy operational requirements, the tors forcing the 22nd MEU to delay Indo-Pacific region. 31st MEU was forced to cut short its rescue operations in order to take on In his farewell letter to the force, former Secretary of Defense James N.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise Cobra Gold Ends Sentenced Aim/ Involved in Special Opera- Thins Cross Training
    r- What in the world are we Navy League awards all-around Marines Page A 1 doing in Asia? itPI Liarora Page A -2 `Bandits' snag another victory Page 13-1 Vol IA, No. 23 Published at MCAS KaneoNe Bay. Also serving 1st MED, Camp H.M. Smith and Marine Barracks, Hawaii. .1iine 14, 1990 Two Marines Exercise Cobra Gold ends sentenced Aim/ involved in special opera- thins cross training. for fraud, Cobra Gold 90, a joint- service exercise involving This year's Cobra Gold mail theft the armed forces of Thai- included an amphibious JrISO land and the United States, landing and joint/com- ended June 1. The exer- bined air and land opera- Two Kaneohe-based Ma- cise, which was conducted tions. rines were sentenced to a in and around Chonburi, total of eight years' con. in Nakhon Ratchasima Civic Action/humanitar- finement and dishonorable (Korat) and in Rayong ian projects that took place discharges resulting from Province, was the ninth in during the exercise involved their court-martial convic- the Cobra Gold series. combined U.S./Thai mobile tions on theft and fraud dental and medical teams. charges. The teams conducted daily For more on clinics in several villages The conviction capped a throughout the operational sear of proceedings and in- Cobra Gold, area. School buildings were vestigations by federal, used for primary health clin- civil and military authori- see page A-3 ics and others will be re- ties regarding a credit fraud ferred to existing civilian scheme involving Cpls health care facilities or the Gloria Sykes and Michael combined U.S./Thai medi- D.
    [Show full text]
  • SAF Concludes Participation in Multinational Exercise Cobra Gold 2020 in Thailand
    SAF Concludes Participation in Multinational Exercise Cobra Gold 2020 in Thailand 06 Mar 2020 Representatives from the participating countries at the opening ceremony of Exercise Cobra Gold 2020 The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) participated in Exercise Cobra Gold from 25 February to 6 March 2020 in Phitsanulok, Thailand. The exercise was co-hosted by the Royal Thai Armed Forces and the United States Indo-Pacific Command (US INDOPACOM). This year marks the SAF's 21st year of participation in the exercise. Exercise Cobra Gold 2020 focused on the coordination of multinational Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) operations. The SAF's Changi Regional HADR Coordination Centre (RHCC) and the US INDOPACOM's Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance jointly facilitated discussions on the regional HADR architecture and mechanisms for effective and efficient coordination of disaster response. This year's Exercise Cobra Gold also include a command post exercise, a field training exercise, and a cyber exercise. A 55-member SAF contingent, led by Chief Guards Officer Brigadier-General Seet Uei Lim, undertook various roles within the Multinational Combined Task Force, alongside their counterparts from the other participating nations. In addition, a five-member team of combat engineers from the Singapore Army also participated in a multinational Engineer Civic AssistanceProgram to construct a community hall and activity centre for the Ban Krang School, situated in Phitsanulok Province, Thailand. Exercise Cobra Gold is one of the largest multinational exercises in the Asia-Pacific region. In its 39th iteration, the annual exercise promotes friendship, interoperability, and mutual understanding amongst the participating armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Asia Solidifies Antiterrorism Support, Lobbies for Postwar Iraq Reconstruction
    U.S.-Southeast Asia Relations: Southeast Asia Solidifies Antiterrorism Support, Lobbies For Postwar Iraq Reconstruction Sheldon W. Simon Political Science Department, Arizona State University The past quarter has witnessed growing antiterrorist cooperation by the core ASEAN states (Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand) with the United States to apprehend the Bali bombers and others bent on attacking Western interests. Although Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand were reticent about supporting the U.S. war in Iraq because of concern about the political backlash from their own Muslim populations, these states as well as Singapore and the Philippines – openly enthusiastic about Washington’s quick Iraq victory – are looking beyond the war to economic reconstruction opportunities there. American plans to reduce and reposition forces in the Pacific may have a Philippine component if Manila agrees to prepositioning military supplies there. The United States also expressed concern over Indonesia’s military assault on Aceh province, Cambodian violence against Thai residents, and Burma’s crackdown on the pro- democracy opposition. Antiterrorist Cooperation in the Philippines Controversy surrounds the joint Philippine-U.S. Balikatan 03 military exercises undertaken this year in Luzon and still in the planning stages for Mindanao. While the Luzon exercises near the former Clark Air Base went off smoothly, plans for the southern Philippines have yet to be implemented. The United States seemed to want to alter the “terms of reference” for the exercise to a “joint operation” that would take place in the Sulu archipelago, home to the Abu Sayyaf terrorist group against which last year’s Balikatan 02 had also been directed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Southeast Asia
    ISSN 0219-3213 2015 #20 Trends in Southeast Asia THAILAND’S POST-COUP RELATIONS WITH CHINA AND AMERICA: MORE BEIJING, LESS WASHINGTON IAN STOREY TRS20/15s ISBN 978-981-4695-70-1 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 789814 695701 Trends in Southeast Asia 15-03278 01 Trends_2015-20.indd 1 24/11/15 8:15 am The ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) was established in 1968. It is an autonomous regional research centre for scholars and specialists concerned with modern Southeast Asia. The Institute’s research is structured under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS) and Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and through country- based programmes. It also houses the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), Singapore’s APEC Study Centre, as well as the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) and its Archaeology Unit. 15-03278 01 Trends_2015-20.indd 2 24/11/15 8:15 am 2015 # 20 Trends in Southeast Asia THAILAND’S POST-COUP RELATIONS WITH CHINA AND AMERICA: MORE BEIJING, LESS WASHINGTON IAN STOREY 15-03278 01 Trends_2015-20.indd 3 24/11/15 8:15 am Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2015 ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission. The author is wholly responsible for the views expressed in this book which do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • AH200710.Pdf
    ◀ AD3 Eric Kern observes an aircraft descending from the flight deck to the hangar bay on an aircraft elevator aboard USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76). Photo by MC3 Kevin S. O’Brien [On the Front Cover] Sailors aboard USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) hroughout the year, All Hands tries to showcase the stand at attention as two military veterans are laid to rest in the Pacific Ocean during a burial-at- many ways that Sailors around the globe contribute sea ceremony. ADCS Gilberto Gordils Jr., formerly assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron 115, was one to the well-being of their nation. of the veterans laid to rest during the ceremony. Gordils’ former squadron is currently aboard Ronald T Reagan assigned to Carrier Air Wing 14 where many of the Sailors from the squadron gathered to pay You’ll find Sailors just about anywhere, supporting maritime security, fostering international their last respects. cooperation, providing humanitarian assistance, contributing boots on the ground and participating in a Photo by MC3 Joanna M. Rippee huge range of missions. You’ll find evidence of that right here in our annual “Any Day in the Navy” issue, [On the Back Cover] which is intended to highlight the Navy as seen by Navy photographers and others around the world. We Sailors assigned to USS Hawaii (SSN 776) stand at attention after hoisting the National Ensign and here on the staff of All Hands can’t be everywhere at once, but they are. Commissioning Pennant, placing the ship in active service. Hawaii is the third Virginia-class submarine It’s a challenge to take more than 12,000 photos taken between July 2006 and July 2007, and distill to be commissioned, and the first major U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster-Mgmt-Ref-Hdbk-Thailand.Pdf
    Cover and section photo credits Cover Photo: “Wat Yai Chai Mongkhon, Ayutthaya” (Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand) by DavideGorla is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/66321334@N00/16578276372/in/photolist-4Baas4 Country Overview Section Photo: “Long-tail Boat” (Mueang Krabi, Krabi, Thailand) by Ellen Munro is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellenmunro/4563601426/in/photolist-7XgDHd Disaster Overview Section Photo: “Bang Niang Tsunami Alert Center”, (Thailand) by Electrostatico is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/electrostatico/321187917/in/photolist-4MJtUH Organizational Structure for DM Section Photo: “Cobra Gold 18: Disaster Relief Rescue Operations” (Chachoengsao, Thailand) by Cpl. Breanna Weisenberger, III Marine Expeditionary Force. February 22, 2018. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/4159865/cobra-gold-18-disaster-relief-rescue-operations Infrastructure Section Photo: “Multicolored Traffic Jam in Bangkok” (Bang Khun Phrom, Bangkok, Thailand) by Christian Haugen is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/christianhaugen/3344053553/in/photolist-66v9BK Health Section Photo: “Hospital, Boats & Shops along the River” (Bangkok, Thailand) by Kathy is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/44603071@N00/14175574498/in/photolist-7XA9h6 Women, Peace and Security Section Photo: “Woman in Blue, Floating Market” (Bangkok, Thailand) by Julia Maudlin is licensed under CC BY-2.0. https://www.flickr.com/photos/juliamaudlin/14915627946/in/photolist-oJ3ux5 Conclusion Section Photo: “Floating Market, Thailand” (Ratchaburi, Thailand) by Russ Bowling, is licensed under CC BY-2.0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/robphoto/2901557255/in/photolist-5qpeTe Appendices Section Photo: “Bangkok, Chinatown” (Samphanthawong Khwaeng, Bangkok) by Chrisgel Ryan Cruz is licensed under CC BY-2.0.
    [Show full text]
  • US Pacific Command Will Oversee 146 Military Exercises This Year to Build Relationships and Hone Combat Readiness
    Sharpening the Spear USAF photo by SSgt. Lakisha A. Croley By Richard Halloran US Pacific Command will oversee 146 military exercises this year to build relationships and hone combat readiness. 72 AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2011 ar more than any other mili- tary force in the Asia-Pacific region, US Pacific Com- mand trains airmen, soldiers, Fsailors, and marines in an extensive array of exercises intended to give them an advantage over likely adversaries—and thus deter potential enemies. USAF photo TSgt.by Shane CuomoA. Some of the 146 exercises on PA- COM’s schedule for Fiscal 2011 are those of a single service; more focus on joint training. Others are bilateral, where the US seeks to build trust and confidence in the forces of another nation. Still others are multilateral coalition-building efforts. Among the newer type of exercises is training for humanitarian operations. Cobra Gold is representative. In the spring, all four US services are sched- uled to head to Thailand to take part in Cobra Gold alongside Thai forces and those of Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia, with a total Left: An F-15 is refueled during December’s Keen Sword exercise at Kadena AB, of 11,000 participants. The US Army Japan. Above: USAF, Thai Air Force, and Singapore Air Force members track a and Marine Corps alternate each year “downed” aircraft during a Cobra Gold exercise. Below: Photographers snap a C-17 Globemaster III during 2010’s RIMPAC exercise. PACOM participates in the most as the US ground element, with the exercises of any military force in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • SAF Participates in Exercise Cobra Gold
    SAF Participates in Exercise Cobra Gold 02 May 2005 BAN NONG LOM, TAK, THAILAND (8 May) - Singapore Armed Forces CPT (NS) (DR) Ashim Dutt and Royal Thai Air Force Group Captain Lerpong share their experience during a medical civilian assistance programme (MEDCAP) as part of Exercise Cobra Gold '05. (Courtesy photo) (Released) The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), together with the Royal Thai Armed Forces, the United States Armed Forces and the Japanese Self Defence Force will be conducting Exercise Cobra Gold from 2 to 13 May 2005 in Chiang Mai, Thailand. The SAF had sent observers to this annual multinational exercise since 1993 and became a full participant in 2000. This year’s exercise will focus on international humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations. The 86-member SAF contingent will be participating in the command post exercise phase of Exercise Cobra Gold, undertaking the role of staff planners for the multinational Combined Task Force alongside their Thai, US, and Japanese counterparts. The SAF delegation will be led by Chief Guards Officer, Brigadier-General Goh Kee Nguan, who is also the Assistant Combined Task Force Commander for the exercise. Observers for this year’s exercise include Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and New Zealand. 1 Exercise Cobra Gold enhances interoperability among the participating armed forces in areas such as joint operational planning processes, as well as command, control and co-ordination issues relating to HADR operations. Apart from enhancing professionalism, the exercise also promotes mutual understanding and friendship. BAN JINGTEENUEAN, Thailand (10 May) - Singapore Army MSG Timothy Rajah examines a local during a Medical Civil Action Program (MEDCAP) visit in support of Exercise Cobra Gold ‘05.
    [Show full text]