DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Defense Appropriations for 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Defense Appropriations for 2013 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2013 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida, Chairman JERRY LEWIS, California NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana JACK KINGSTON, Georgia JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia KAY GRANGER, Texas MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey KEN CALVERT, California MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York JO BONNER, Alabama TOM COLE, Oklahoma NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Rogers, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Dicks, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. TOM MCLEMORE, JENNIFER MILLER, PAUL TERRY, WALTER HEARNE, ANN REESE, TIM PRINCE, BROOKE BOYER, B G WRIGHT, ADRIENNE RAMSAY, and MEGAN MILAM ROSENBUSCH, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 2 Page Fiscal Year 2013 Army Budget Overview .......................... 1 Defense Health Program ....................................................... 137 Fiscal Year 2013 National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Budget Overview .................................................. 333 U.S. Pacific Command / U.S. Forces Korea ........................ 451 Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization .......................................................................... 497 Outside Witness Statements ................................................. 545 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 79–874 WASHINGTON : 2013 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with HEARING VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:21 Apr 09, 2013 Jkt 079874 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 7513 Sfmt 7513 E:\HR\OC\79874P1.XXX 79874P1 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky, Chairman C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida 1 NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington JERRY LEWIS, California 1 MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana JACK KINGSTON, Georgia NITA M. LOWEY, New York RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey JOSE´ E. SERRANO, New York TOM LATHAM, Iowa ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia JO ANN EMERSON, Missouri JOHN W. OLVER, Massachusetts KAY GRANGER, Texas ED PASTOR, Arizona MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California DENNY REHBERG, Montana SAM FARR, California JOHN R. CARTER, Texas JESSE L. JACKSON, JR., Illinois RODNEY ALEXANDER, Louisiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania KEN CALVERT, California STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey JO BONNER, Alabama SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio BARBARA LEE, California TOM COLE, Oklahoma ADAM B. SCHIFF, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona MICHAEL M. HONDA, California MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota CHARLES W. DENT, Pennsylvania STEVE AUSTRIA, Ohio CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming TOM GRAVES, Georgia KEVIN YODER, Kansas STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas ALAN NUNNELEE, Mississippi ————— 1 Chairman Emeritus WILLIAM B. INGLEE, Clerk and Staff Director (II) wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with HEARING VerDate Mar 15 2010 10:21 Apr 09, 2013 Jkt 079874 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7513 Sfmt 7513 E:\HR\OC\79874P1.XXX 79874P1 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2013 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2012. FY2013 ARMY BUDGET OVERVIEW WITNESSES HON. JOHN M. MCHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY GENERAL RAYMOND T. ODIERNO, CHIEF OF STAFF, UNITED STATES ARMY OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN YOUNG Mr. YOUNG. Good morning. The Committee will be in order. This morning the Committee is holding a hearing on the budget for the United States Army for fiscal year 2013. We will be discussing per- sonnel matters, current operations and readiness, research and de- velopment and procurement, along with any other subject that our witnesses prefer to raise or that the members prefer to ask about. And we are very happy to welcome our distinguished witnesses, the Honorable John McHugh, Secretary of the Army, and General Raymond T. Odierno, Chief of Staff of the Army. And of course John McHugh has been one of our colleagues for many, many years, former chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and a colleague that we are very proud of, Mr. Secretary. And General, we are very, very happy to have you here. Your biography will be placed in the record, which is an extremely, extremely impressive biography. It will be placed in our record. Mr. Secretary, you have appeared several times before this sub- committee as Secretary of the Army. We welcome you back, as you are a veteran of the budget process and you bring to these pro- ceedings a wealth of experience based on your service in the House of Representatives and your ongoing service as Secretary of the Army. Representing the people of New York’s 23rd and 24th Dis- tricts, you served as ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee and you served on the Oversight and Government Re- form Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and that is quite a background. You are highly re- spected in the area of military affairs, and we are pleased that you are here today to discuss the Army budget request for fiscal year 2013. General, 38th Chief of Staff of the United States Army, welcome to you, sir. We note that you are a New Jersey native, as is one of our ranking members, who will be here shortly, that you are a West Point graduate and you are one of a very small company of officers who have commanded at division, corps and Army levels in (1) erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with HEARING VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:44 Apr 09, 2013 Jkt 079874 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 E:\HR\OC\A874P2.XXX A874P2 2 the same conflict. Quite a history and quite a record. And while serving in positions other than command, you were an assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and military advisor to Secretary of State Rice. You bring with you experience gained in three tours in Iraq, initially as commanding general 4th Infantry Division and culminating as Commander of the Multi-National Force Iraq and senior U.S. Military commander in Iraq. Impres- sive. At present you are guiding the Army through a ramping down of actions in Afghanistan and a shifting focus to the Asia-Pacific. Your assessment of the status of personnel, equipment and train- ing readiness will be of great assistance to this committee as we consider how to best allocate resources so that the Army might ac- complish its mission in defense of our Nation. OPERATIONS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN Mr. Secretary and General, salute you and the men and women, officers and enlisted soldiers, family members and civilian employ- ees that you represent. For the past decade the Army has carried a heavy load in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite multiple extended combat tours many soldiers and their families have continued to serve in the Army. They are proud of what they have done, as they should be, and what they continue to do for the Nation. ARMY END STRENGTH REDUCTION Although operations are ramping down in Afghanistan, we hope that they will be successful. Deployments do continue. Meanwhile the Secretary of Defense has announced that while the United States will continue an active approach to countering the threat posed by violent extremists, the focus of national defense will be balanced toward the Asia-Pacific region. A significant reduction in Army end strength is planned, yet the Army is expected to main- tain the capability to regenerate ground forces as necessary. ARMY READINESS Mr. Secretary, General, reversibility sounds great, but this com- mittee will want to hear how you ensure the Army when called to action can provide the needed units fully manned, equipped and trained. The 32nd Chief of Staff of the Army, General Gordon Sul- livan, frequently noted that hope is not a method. This Committee will continue to support an Army that is properly equipped, prop- erly supplied, and fully trained. The Committee will guard against a hollow Army, and we would like to hear your assessment of where you propose to accept risk in soldier end strength, training, equipment, readiness and modernization. SUICIDE AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT PREVENTION We will be interested in your plan to downsize the Army and pro- grams to prevent, important programs to prevent suicide and sex- ual harassment. Fiscal management and the frequency and mag- nitude of reprogramming requests are likely topics of discussion, as they were considerably last year. And we will be interested in your updates on key acquisition programs, including Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, Ground Combat Vehicle, Armed Aerial Scout, Abrams tank erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with HEARING VerDate Mar 15 2010 11:44 Apr 09, 2013 Jkt 079874 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\A874P2.XXX A874P2 3 and Paladin self-propelled Howitzer. We are interested as well in the performance of the Stryker vehicles that have the double V hull. NETWORK INTEGRATION EVALUATIONS (NIE) Finally, the Army has initiated a series of network integration evaluations at Fort Bliss in Texas. We will be interested to hear how that process is working and how the findings and rec- ommendations are used to inform acquisition programs. Mr. Secretary and General, we have an ambitious agenda this morning. We want to get started. But before we proceed I am going to complete my remarks. I should have just put them in the record, because what I said about all of you, you already know. Anyway, before we proceed I want to recognize Mr. Dicks, the former chair- man of the subcommittee and ranking member on the Full Com- mittee. Chairman Dicks. REMARKS OF MR. DICKS Mr. DICKS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. In welcoming both Sec- retary McHugh and General Odierno before the Committee, we ex- tend our sincere thanks to you both for your many years of service and dedication to our Nation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2001-12 A strategic plan for the Crusader Howitzer. Lockard, William M. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9707 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE CRUSADER HOWITZER by William M. Lockard December 2001 Thesis Advisor: David Matthews Associate Advisor: Keith Snider Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Title (Mix case letters) 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer 6. AUTHOR(S) William M. Lockard 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0
    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Aiming Point Strategies for Field Artillery Against Area Targets a T H E S I S Presented to T H E F a C
    AN INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF GRADUATE STUDIES By LAWRENCE CARL PETERSEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1978 INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS Approved: Dougl&i C Montgome&fy, Chairman Leslie G. Callahan ' \ r-—: —' rrv[^rpvyvrm —~ Harrison M. Wadsworth Date approved by Chairman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Douglas C. Montgomery who served as my advisor and provided much assistance and guidance throughout this research. I am also grateful to the other members of the reading committee, Dr. Leslie G. Callahan and Dr. Harrison M. Wadsworth. Their suggestions and observations have greatly improved this thesis. I wish to thank Mr. Keith Myers and the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity for sponsoring the research; as well as Mr. Lonnie Minton of the Material Development Team, USAFAS, Fort Sill; Captain Allen Young of the TACFIRE Branch, Department of Combat Development, USAFAS, Fort Sill; and Mr. Merlyn Smith, BCS Technical Consultant for the Norden Division of United Technologies, for their valuable assistance. My most special thanks go to my wife, Barbara, for her patience, encouragement, and understanding during this research. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi SUMMARY viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 Description of the Problem Objective of the Research Scope of the Research II. LITERATURE REVIEW 6 The Coverage Problems Models III.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPORTS of Military Goods
    2019 EXPORTS of Military Goods www.exportcontrols.gc.ca - 0 - Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Summary of Key Data ........................................................................................................................... - 4 - 2. Canada’s Policy on the Export and Brokering of Military Items ........................................................... - 6 - Military Goods and Technology – “Groups 2 and 9” ............................................................................ - 7 - Export and Brokering Permit Assessment Process ............................................................................... - 8 - Brokering Controls ................................................................................................................................ - 9 - Notes on the Export of Firearms ........................................................................................................ - 10 - International Cooperation on Military Trade ..................................................................................... - 11 - The Canadian Defence, Security and Aerospace Industry………………………………………………………………- 11 - 3. Developments in 2019 ....................................................................................................................... - 11 - Coming into Force of Amendments to the Export and Import Permits Act ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery
    TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1 II. Current Field Artillery Weapons ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Additional Protocols 40 Years Later: New Conflicts, New Actors, New Perspectives”
    40th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law “The Additional Protocols 40 Years Later: New Conflicts, New Actors, New Perspectives” Sanremo, 7-9 September 2017 Col. (ret.) Noam Neuman, former Head, International Law Department, Military Advocate General’s Corps, Israel Defence Forces Considering the Principle of Precautions Introduction I would like to thank the organizers of the conference for inviting me to speak. It is a great honor and privilege to be here. Before I start, I would like to give the usual caveat - I am here in my personal capacity. The opinions and ideas in my presentation do not necessarily represent the views of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) or the Government of Israel. My point of reference for the discussion regarding precautionary duties under customary international law is the language of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (API). While it is widely accepted that custom mandates taking certain precautions in attack, it is important to keep in mind that not all states are parties to API (such as Israel and the US) and that there are some disagreements regarding the exact scope, and phrasing, of the customary rule in comparison to Article 57 of API. Nevertheless, API is a useful point of reference, considering the fact that so many militaries are bound by it. I will therefore use it as a point of reference during my presentation. To start, we should recall that in API there are two different obligations with regard to precautions. The first one, "precautions in attacks", refers to "active precautions" that the attacking party needs to take in the conduct of its military operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Uses of Foreign Military Financing, International Military
    Report on the Uses of Foreign Military Financing, International Military Education and Training, and Peacekeeping Operations Funds (Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, FY 2006, Section 584) FT 2006 FOREIGN MILITARY FINANCING CUMULATIVE QUARTERLY REPORT - June 30,2014 ($ in thousands) OBLIGATIONS AS OF EXPENDITURES AS OF COUNTRY June 30,2014____________ June 30,2014_______ USE/PURPOSE OF FUNDS AFRICA Djibouti 3.960 3,960 Training ammunition; technical assistance construction; blanket order training; construction equipment; camouflage clothing; modular tent system. Ethiopia 1.980 1.980 Aircraft parts/accessories; VHF radios/equipment. Ghana 495 495 M16A4 spare parts, components, accessories, and maintenance support items w/ magazines Liberia 1.980 1.980 Coast Guard technical services. Nigeria 990 990 Modeling and simulation center; C-130 technical coordination program; spare parts for buoy tenders, blanket order training, and C-130H engine. 495 495 Weapons spares; blanket order training; vehicles; JANUS system; body armor; packing, crating, and handling. Africa Coastal/Border Security 3.960 3,200 Benin (S200K Supply Support for 27’ Defender Boats); Burundi (S130K Foreign Aircraft Spares); Ghana (S150K Supply Support for Balsam Class Buoy); Nigeria Program ($75K Supply Support); Sao Tome (S125K Boat Spares for Sea Turtle Conservation); Senegal (S150K Patrol Craft Spares); Mozambique (S520K communication equipment;inflatable boat); Comoros (S470K fast response boat); Mauritius ($270Kfast patrol boats); Cape Verde ($200K boat spares); Cameroon
    [Show full text]
  • M60 M2 Blyskawica
    Machine guns/1 Machine guns/2 M60 M2 Machine gun Heavy machine gun Can be used both offensive and defensive Nicknamed Ma Deuce by troops Usually operated by more than one soldier Designed by John Browning When tested in the field, the M60 was fairly effective Country USA Country USA Date 1900 Date 1932 Length (mm) 10 Length (mm) 1650 Weight (kg) 10 Weight (kg) 38 Speed (m/s) 85 Speed (m/s) 930 Cannon caliber (mm) 7,62 Cannon caliber (mm) 12,7 Machine guns/3 Machine guns/4 Blyskawica MP5 Submachine gun Submachine gun Probably the only weapon designed and mass The MP5s accuracy, reliability, and wide range of produced covertly in occupied Europe accessories and variants have made it the submachine gun of choice for law enforcement agencies worldwide. Country Poland Country Germany Date 1943 Date 1966 Length (mm) 730 Length (mm) 680 Weight (kg) 3,22 Weight (kg) 2,54 Speed (m/s) 400 Speed (m/s) 270 Cannon caliber (mm) 9 Cannon caliber (mm) 9 Machine guns/5 Machine guns/6 Sten Mark II AA-52 Service sub-machine gun Vehicle-mounted machine gun The name STEN is an acronym, deriving from One of the first French produced guns of the the names of the weapons chief designers post World War II era Over 4 million Stens would be made in the 1940s Country UK Country France Date 1941 Date 1960 Length (mm) 760 Length (mm) 1080 Weight (kg) 3,18 Weight (kg) 9,75 Speed (m/s) 365 Speed (m/s) 830 Cannon caliber (mm) 9 Cannon caliber (mm) 7,5 Machine guns/7 Guns/1 PM63-Rak Desert Eagle Sub-machine gun Semi-automatic, gas-operated pistol War service : Sino-Vietnamese
    [Show full text]
  • The Army's Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Background And
    The Army’s Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Background and Issues for Congress Updated July 10, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43240 The Army’s Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Background and Issues for Congress Summary The Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) is the Army’s replacement for the Vietnam-era M- 113 personnel carriers, which are still in service in a variety of support capacities in Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs). While M-113s no longer serve as infantry fighting vehicles, five variants of the M-113 are used as command and control vehicles, general purpose vehicles, mortar carriers, and medical treatment and evacuation vehicles. The AMPV is a nondevelopmental program (candidate vehicles would be either existing vehicles or modified existing vehicles—not vehicles that are specially designed and not currently in service). Some suggest a nondevelopmental vehicle might make it easier for the Army to eventually field this system to the force, as most of the Army’s past developmental programs, such as the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV), the Future Combat System (FCS), the Crusader self- propelled artillery system, and the Comanche helicopter, were cancelled before they could be fully developed and fielded. On November 26, 2013, the Army issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the AMPV. This RFP stipulated the Army planned to award a five-year Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract in May 2014 worth $458 million to a single contractor for 29 prototypes. While the March 2013 RFP established an Average Unit Manufacturing Cost Ceiling for each AMPV at $1.8 million, this was rescinded to permit vendors greater flexibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army's Future Combat Systems Program
    CBO TESTIMONY Statement of J. Michael Gilmore Assistant Director The Army’s Future Combat Systems Program before the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives April 4, 2006 This document is embargoed until it is delivered at 2 p.m. (EDT) on Tuesday, April 4, 2006. The contents may not be published, transmitted, or otherwise communicated by any print, broadcast, or electronic media before that time. CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE SECOND AND D STREETS, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 Mr. Chairman, Congressman Abercrombie, and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the Army’s Future Combat Systems (FCS) program and possible alternative approaches to moderniz- ing the Army’s forces. My statement is based on a forthcoming Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study that was requested by Mr. Abercrombie. CBO’s analysis of the FCS program and potential alternatives supports the follow- ing observations: B The FCS program must surmount substantial technical and funding challenges if it is to develop and initially field all of the individual FCS components as cur- rently scheduled—by December 2014. B According to the Army’s estimates, total annual costs to purchase the various FCS components could approach $10 billion.1 However, if such costs grew as those of similar programs have in the past, annual costs could reach $16 billion. B Moreover, if the Army fields FCS vehicles according to its current schedule, more than $2 billion of additional funding could be needed annually from 2010 through 2016—with lesser amounts required thereafter—to maintain and up- grade the Army’s inventory of aging ground combat systems.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Ground Forces and the Conventional Balance in Europe
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE JUNE 1988 U.S. Ground Forces and the Conventional Balance in Europe CBO STUDY U.S. GROUND FORCES AND THE CONVENTIONAL BALANCE IN EUROPE The Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 85-887 - 88 - 1 : QL 3 NOTES Unless otherwise indicated, all years referred to in this report are fiscal years. Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts reflect budget authority in constant fiscal year 1989 dollars. Details in the text, tables, and figures of this report may not add to totals because of rounding. PREFACE The conventional balance in Europe between the forces of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Warsaw Pact has been the topic of widespread debate since the two alliances were formed shortly after World War n. The recent agreement between the United States and the Soviet Union to eliminate the entire class of intermediate-range nuclear weapons has focused attention on the relative standing of the conventional forces that remain in Europe. Many suggestions have been made in recent years as to how to improve NATO's standing in relation to the Warsaw Pact, including numerous proposals for in- creasing the capability of NATO's ground forces. Yet the Congress, faced with budgetary constraints, must consider the cost of those op- tions as well as their benefits. This study by the Congressional Bud- get Office, performed at the request of the House Committee on Armed Services, first assesses the current standing of NATO relative to the Warsaw Pact, with emphasis on each alliance's ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soldier and the Industrial Base Chapter 11 Carbon Monoxide
    Carbon Monoxide Chapter 11 CARBON MONOXIDE TIMOTHY B. WEYANDT, M.D., M.P.H.* AND CHARLES DAVID RIDGELEY, Jr., M.D., M.S.† INTRODUCTION TYPICAL SOURCES OF EXPOSURE Steel Manufacturing Combustion Engine Exhaust Methylene Chloride Smoking MILITARY EXPOSURES World War I: Combat Mining Operations World War II: Tank Warfare The Modern Era: Armored Fighting Vehicles Military Aviation Household Heating PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EXPOSURE Carbon Monoxide’s Hemoglobin-Binding Affinity Carboxyhemoglobin and Oxyhemoglobin Dissociation HEALTH EFFECTS Autopsy Findings Signs and Symptoms of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Staging of Signs and Symptoms Exposure and Muscular Exertion Central Nervous System Effects Circulatory Effects Chronic Effects DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT Clinical Diagnosis Treatment HEALTH STANDARDS Occupational Safety and Health Administration American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Committee on Toxicology Military Standards MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SUMMARY *Director, Occupational Health Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802; Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army (ret); formerly, Medical Advisor for Clinical, Occupational, and Environmental Health; U.S. Army Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5010 †Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army; Occupational Medicine Physician, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Division, U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5422 397 Occupational Health: The Soldier and the Industrial Base INTRODUCTION Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless, taste- Many of the effects of what we now recognize as less and nonirritating gas formed as a by-product in carbon monoxide poisoning were discussed in an- the incomplete combustion of carbonaceous materi- cient literature. During the Middle Ages, these effects als. Frequently, but not reliably, the presence of were sometimes considered to be the work of demons carbon monoxide is accompanied by the odor of un- and witches.
    [Show full text]