OE Threat Assessment: Egypt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OE Threat Assessment: Egypt Dec 2012 OE Threat Assessment: Egypt TRADOC G-2 Intelligence Support Activity (TRISA) Complex Operational Environment and Threat Integration Directorate (CTID) [Type the author name] United States Army 6/1/2012 OE Threat Assessment: Egypt Introduction Egypt is located at an important crossroad, both geographically and politically. Physically, the country possesses the land on both sides of the Suez Canal, thus controlling a vital chokepoint for global maritime commerce. Politically, it is still attempting to develop a new constitution and a functioning government since the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak in early 2011. While the country faces many challenges including natural disasters, unemployment, terrorist activity, and drug trafficking, the absence of a stable government that is legitimate in the eyes of its own people overrides all other concerns. Political Egypt’s current political system is in a state of transition that began on 25 January 2011. At that time, the “Arab Spring” manifested in the country in the form of large protests and demonstrations against the government that only grew in size and intensity with each passing day. Long-time President and U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak resigned under pressure on 11 February 2011 and handed power to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), which immediately dissolved the Egyptian parliament and suspended the constitution. The SCAF put forth an interim constitution, approved by voters and put into force in March 2011, that outlined steps to achieving a new, permanent constitution. The document called for the creation of a constituent assembly to draft the new constitution, and also included reforms such as presidential term limits and an independent judiciary. Elections for a new Parliament were held November 2011-January 2012, and both houses convened shortly thereafter. The presidential election of May-June 2012 resulted in Mohammed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood candidate, winning the poll and taking office on 30 June 2012. The current Egyptian political system consists of executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The executive is headed by the president, who appoints the prime minister, at least one vice president, and the cabinet. The legislature consists of the 508-seat Majlis al-Sha’b (People’s Assembly) and the 270-seat Majlis al-Shura (Shura Council). 498 members of the former and 180 of the latter are elected; the remainder are appointed by the president. The judiciary includes general courts, special courts such as military courts, and the Supreme Constitutional Court. Four political alliances – each consisting of 3-7 political parties – and seven additional parties currently exist in Egypt. The most pressing issue in the country is political instability. The president and the judiciary are at loggerheads, as are the Islamist parties against the moderate and liberal parties. Examples of these conflicts include the following events: 2 UNCLASSIFIED OE Threat Assessment: Egypt • The Supreme Constitutional Court dissolved the People’s Assembly on 14 June 2012, which President Morsi subsequently attempted to reinstate – unsuccessfully – by presidential decree. • The first constituent assembly was also dissolved by the Court, which deemed it to be "unrepresentative.” A second assembly was then appointed, but was later boycotted by moderate and liberal political parties, who viewed it as being dominated by Islamists. • President Morsi issued a decree on 22 November 2012 granting himself new powers and removing the Supreme Constitutional Court’s right to overturn any of his decisions. Popular demonstrations immediately broke out, at one point forcing Morsi to flee the presidential palace. Morsi subsequently annulled the decree on 9 December after continuous protests, some of which turned violent. • The remaining members of the second constituent assembly rushed the completion of a proposed constitution, which is scheduled for a vote on 15 December 2012. Despite repeated requests by opposition members, Morsi has refused to delay the referendum. Moderate and liberal parties are protesting the vote, stating that the proposed constitution is unrepresentative and will impede on the rights of women and minorities. • Thousands of judges went on strike after Morsi’s 22 November decree. As it is judges who oversee popular elections in Egypt, it is possible that the referendum either will not be able to occur due to the refusal of the judiciary to oversee it, or that it will occur despite lack of judicial oversight and then be declared null and void by the courts. As these incidents show, Egypt remains politically unstable nearly two years after the resignation of Mubarak. Depending on the events surrounding the constitutional referendum – still slated for 15 December 2012 as of this writing – there is the real possibility that the country will fall back into fighting and undergo yet another revolution. Military Non-State Paramilitary Forces Battalion of the Martyr Abdullah Azzam The Battalion of the Martyr Abdullah Azzam – not to be confused with the Abdullah Azzam Brigades – is a militant Egyptian Islamist group associated with al Qaeda to the extent that two 3 UNCLASSIFIED OE Threat Assessment: Egypt of its aliases are “al Qaeda in the Levant and Egypt” and “al Qaeda in Syria and Egypt.” The group’s goal is to remove non-Muslims and their influence from Middle Eastern Muslim countries. It is best known for sophisticated bomb attacks against popular tourist sites in Egypt, including the simultaneous vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED) bombings of multiple Sinai resorts in 2004. Though the group is not known to have committed any attacks after 2005, it was assessed to still be active as recently as 2008. Gama’a al-Islamiya (IG) Also known as Islamic Group or Egyptian Islamic Group, IG was formed in Egypt during the 1970s. Prominent former members include Omar abd ar-Rahman, aka the “Blind Sheikh”, and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the current leader of al Qaeda (AQ). IG’s primary goal is to establish an Islamic state in Egypt. Activities in the 1980s and 1990s included the assassination of then- President Anwar Sadat; the attempted assassination of then-President Hosni Mubarak; town uprisings; attacks on Christians, security forces, government officials, and tourists; and bank/train robberies. In 1997, the group formally announced its affiliation with AQ. An Egyptian crackdown on IG led to a ceasefire in March 1999, which was widely maintained until 2006. The group split in 2006, when Abu Jihad al Masri announced its merger with al Qaeda (AQ). Those primarily outside Egypt stayed with the Abu Jihad faction and AQ, while the majority of members inside Egypt went with Sayyid Imam al Sharif, aka Dr. Fadl, who rejected AQ tactics. The Fadl faction has continued to maintain the ceasefire, and now operates as the Building and Development Party – a legal Egyptian political party. The Abu Jihad faction operates primarily in Egypt, and common TTP include vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIED) – including suicide VBIEDs (SVBIEDs) – and small arms attacks against tourist locations such as hotels. Al-Takfir wa al-Hijra Al-Takfir wa al-Hijra (“Excommunication and exodus”) is a group of nebulous origin and identity. Some analysts believe it to be a Sunni Islamist religious group whose members include Ayman al-Zawahiri and the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Others think it is a derogatory name used by Egyptian and other nation’s officials for any militant Islamist group they cannot immediately identify. The group has been linked to or credited with attacks as diverse as the assassination of Anwar Sadat in Egypt in 1981, the attempted assassination of Osama bin Laden in Sudan in 1995, the murder of Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands in 2004, the killing of Iraqi Army recruits in Iraq in 2005, and the rocket-propelled grenade attack on a police building in Egypt in 2011. Additional Groups Groups that have previously been active in Egypt include the Abu Nidal Organization, the Islamic Liberation Organization, and the International Justice Group. While these groups have not been known to have committed any attacks in the past several years, there is insufficient 4 UNCLASSIFIED OE Threat Assessment: Egypt information to determine whether or not they are, in fact, still active. Another group, Egyptian Islamic Jihad – aka al-Jihad – merged with al Qaeda in 2001; it has not committed an attack in Egypt since 1995 and it is unknown if the group retains independent attack capability. Any one of these groups has the potential, given the right impetus, to regroup and recommence attacks in the country. Another group, the Muslim Brotherhood, denounced violence in the early 1980s and has since focused on instituting an Islamic government in Egypt via political means. President Morsi and the majority of Egyptian Parliament members belong to this group. Threat Actors Military Functions Mission Command Threat actors may conduct centralized planning, but will conduct decentralized operations. Threat actors will refrain from the use of electronic mediums for most important communication and instead rely upon couriers. While slower, the messenger system prevents the detection of the communication from sophisticated systems. Maneuver Most threat actors will operate on foot or in civilian vehicles to conduct their terrorist missions. INFOWAR All threat groups will attempt to shape the message that the open media gives the people, both internally and externally to the country. RISTA Most threat actors will use human intelligence (HUMINT) as their primary means to gain information. With their supporters scattered throughout the population, the information will eventually get to the threat actors. In planning any type of operation, the threat actors will most likely conduct personal reconnaissance of the target. Fire Support Threat actors in Egypt will have limited means of fire support. If a threat actor has indirect fire support, it will likely come from one or two mortars at most. Protection Threat actors have limited protection since they will travel on foot or in civilian vehicles.
Recommended publications
  • CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat
    By Systems Assessment Group NDIA Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee August 1999 FEASIBILITY OF THIRD WORLD ADVANCED BALLISTIC AND CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat The Systems Assessment Group of the National Defense Industrial Association ( NDIA) Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee performed this study as a continuing examination of feasible Third World missile threats. Volume 1 provided an assessment of the feasibility of the long range ballistic missile threats (released by NDIA in October 1998). Volume 2 uses aerospace industry judgments and experience to assess Third World cruise missile acquisition and development that is “emerging” as a real capability now. The analyses performed by industry under the broad title of “Feasibility of Third World Advanced Ballistic & Cruise Missile Threat” incorporate information only from unclassified sources. Commercial GPS navigation instruments, compact avionics, flight programming software, and powerful, light-weight jet propulsion systems provide the tools needed for a Third World country to upgrade short-range anti-ship cruise missiles or to produce new land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs) today. This study focuses on the question of feasibility of likely production methods rather than relying on traditional intelligence based primarily upon observed data. Published evidence of technology and weapons exports bears witness to the failure of international agreements to curtail cruise missile proliferation. The study recognizes the role LACMs developed by Third World countries will play in conjunction with other new weapons, for regional force projection. LACMs are an “emerging” threat with immediate and dire implications for U.S. freedom of action in many regions .
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J
    Secretary of the Air Force Janies F. McGovern Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph Lv Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Col Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson. Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett. Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Mu linger Steven C. Garst. Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions ex- pressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as car- rying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a cour- tesy line. JOURNAL SPRING 1989. Vol. Ill, No. I AFRP 50 2 Editorial 2 Air Interdiction Col Clifford R. Kxieger, USAF 4 Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J. Krisinger, USAF 16 Paradox of the Headless Horseman Lt Col Joe Boyles, USAF Capt Greg K. Mittelman, USAF 29 A Rare Feeling of Satisfaction Maj Michael A. Kirtland, USAF 34 Weaseling in the BUFF Col A. Lee Harrell, USAF 36 Thinking About Air Power Maj Andrew J.
    [Show full text]
  • French : the Most Practical Foreign Language
    French : The Most Practical Foreign Language While any language will be useful for some jobs or for some regions, French is the only foreign language that can be useful throughout the world as well as in the United States. French as a foreign language is the second most frequently taught language in the world after English. The International Organization of Francophonie has 51 member states and governments. Of these, 28 countries have French as an official language. French is the only language other than English spoken on five continents. French and English are the only two global languages. When deciding on a foreign language for work or school, consider that French is the language that will give you the most choices later on in your studies or your career. French, along with English, is the official working language of ● the United Nations ● UNESCO ● NATO ● Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ● the International Labor Bureau ● the International Olympic Committee ● the 31-member Council of Europe ● the European Community ● the Universal Postal Union ● the International Red Cross ● Union of International Associations (UIA) French is the dominant working language at ● the European Court of Justice ● the European Tribunal of First Instance ● the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg. ● the Press Room at the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium One example of the importance of French can be seen in a recent listing of international jobs (8/29/06) distributed by the US State Department: 135 required or preferred French, 49 Spanish, 25 a UN language (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish), 6 Arabic, 6 Russian, 2 German, 2 Italian , and Chinese 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2001-12 A strategic plan for the Crusader Howitzer. Lockard, William M. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9707 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE CRUSADER HOWITZER by William M. Lockard December 2001 Thesis Advisor: David Matthews Associate Advisor: Keith Snider Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2001 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Title (Mix case letters) 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Strategic Plan for the Crusader Howitzer 6. AUTHOR(S) William M. Lockard 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ALERT a System to Provide Advanced Warning of an Anti-Ship Missile Attack
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Acoustic Littoral Engagement Response to Threats – ALERT A System to Provide Advanced Warning of an Anti-Ship Missile Attack Duane C. Tate Georgia Tech Research Institute Sensors and Electromagnetic Applications Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0800 [email protected] ABSTRACT Naval warfare is shifting from an almost exclusive deep water, open ocean engagement to a littoral environment where high-value surface ships are forced to operate in close proximity to land, exposing those ships to a new, significant threat - the high speed, sea skimming missile launched from coastal defenses, mobile land launchers, and patrol craft and maritime aircraft operating close to shore. This is a formidable threat. The anti-ship missile is a low radar signature target, making it difficult to detect in any environment. As a sea-skimmer, the missile trajectory is low on the radar's scan area, and in a high clutter region, adding to the detection difficulty. However, in this case, the clutter is magnified by the land background. With missile speeds in excess of ¾ Mach, there is precious little time between detection and missile impact in which to engage this threat. The Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) at the Georgia Institute of Technology has investigated a concept to provide early detection of these sea-skimming missiles and add additional response time for the surface ship. The Acoustic Littoral Engagement Response to Threats (ALERT) system employs an underwater vertical transducer array to detect airborne acoustic noise from the missile that penetrates the air-water boundary. The system capitalizes on the 6 dB signal enhancement due to the pressure-doubling effect at the air-water boundary to improve detectability of the signal, plus the factor of five increase in sound speed in water versus air to reduce detection time.
    [Show full text]
  • Countersea Operations
    COUNTERSEA OPERATIONS Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1.4 15 September 2005 This document complements related discussion found in Joint Publication 3-30, Command and Control for Joint Air Operations. BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE DOCTRINE DOCUMENT 2-1.4 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 15 SEPTEMBER 2005 SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This document is substantially revised. This revision’s overarching changes are new chapter headings and sections, terminology progression to “air and space” from “aerospace,” expanded discussion on planning and employment factors, operational considerations when conducting countersea operations, and effects-based methodology and the emphasis on operations vice capabilities or platforms. Specific changes with this revision are the additions of the naval warfighter’s perspective to enhance understanding the environment, doctrine, and operations of the maritime forces on page 3; comparison between Air Force and Navy/Marine Corp terminology, on page 7, included to ensure Air Force forces are aware of the difference in terms or semantics; a terminology matrix added to simplify that awareness on page 9; amphibious operations organization, command and control, and planning are also included throughout the document. Supersedes: AFDD 2-1.4, 4 June 1999 OPR: HQ AFDC/DS (Lt Col Richard Hughey) Certified by: AFDC/DR (Lt Col Eric Schnitzer) Pages: 66 Distribution: F Approved by: Bentley B. Rayburn, Major General, USAF Commander, Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center FOREWORD Countersea Operations are about the use of Air Force capabilities in the maritime environment to accomplish the joint force commander’s objectives. This doctrine supports DOD Directive 5100.1 requirements for surface sea surveillance, anti-air warfare, anti-surface ship warfare, and anti-submarine warfare.
    [Show full text]
  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0
    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Aiming Point Strategies for Field Artillery Against Area Targets a T H E S I S Presented to T H E F a C
    AN INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF GRADUATE STUDIES By LAWRENCE CARL PETERSEN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN OPERATIONS RESEARCH GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1978 INVESTIGATION OF AIMING POINT STRATEGIES FOR FIELD ARTILLERY AGAINST AREA TARGETS Approved: Dougl&i C Montgome&fy, Chairman Leslie G. Callahan ' \ r-—: —' rrv[^rpvyvrm —~ Harrison M. Wadsworth Date approved by Chairman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. Douglas C. Montgomery who served as my advisor and provided much assistance and guidance throughout this research. I am also grateful to the other members of the reading committee, Dr. Leslie G. Callahan and Dr. Harrison M. Wadsworth. Their suggestions and observations have greatly improved this thesis. I wish to thank Mr. Keith Myers and the U.S. Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity for sponsoring the research; as well as Mr. Lonnie Minton of the Material Development Team, USAFAS, Fort Sill; Captain Allen Young of the TACFIRE Branch, Department of Combat Development, USAFAS, Fort Sill; and Mr. Merlyn Smith, BCS Technical Consultant for the Norden Division of United Technologies, for their valuable assistance. My most special thanks go to my wife, Barbara, for her patience, encouragement, and understanding during this research. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi SUMMARY viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION 1 Description of the Problem Objective of the Research Scope of the Research II. LITERATURE REVIEW 6 The Coverage Problems Models III.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPORTS of Military Goods
    2019 EXPORTS of Military Goods www.exportcontrols.gc.ca - 0 - Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... - 3 - Summary of Key Data ........................................................................................................................... - 4 - 2. Canada’s Policy on the Export and Brokering of Military Items ........................................................... - 6 - Military Goods and Technology – “Groups 2 and 9” ............................................................................ - 7 - Export and Brokering Permit Assessment Process ............................................................................... - 8 - Brokering Controls ................................................................................................................................ - 9 - Notes on the Export of Firearms ........................................................................................................ - 10 - International Cooperation on Military Trade ..................................................................................... - 11 - The Canadian Defence, Security and Aerospace Industry………………………………………………………………- 11 - 3. Developments in 2019 ....................................................................................................................... - 11 - Coming into Force of Amendments to the Export and Import Permits Act ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ausa Background Brief Iraq Today- a Perspective
    AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF IRAQ TODAY- A PERSPECTIVE No. 25 September 1990 The Country Iraq is a virtually landlocked Middle East country bordered by Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Kuwait. It has a population of 17.8 million divided mostly between Arabs (75 percent) and Kurds (15 percent). The population is 95 percent Muslim and is fairly well educated (70 percent literacy rate). Iraq possesses about one-third of Middle East oil reserves, has ample water to meet minimum population needs, and has limited agricultural capability to meet some domestic food requirements (70 percent of food is imported). Because of the drain caused by the eight-year war with Iran and low oil prices, Iraq has accumulated about $80 billion in foreign debts; inflation is running at about 40 percent. Iraq spends about 40 percent of its GNP on defense. Its Leader The so-called "Father-Leader" of Iraq is Saddam Hussein At-Takriti, a minority Sunni Muslim who has gained a reputation as an audacious, ruthless ruler who quickly suppresses any potential threats to his position. He took over the leadership of the governing Ba'th Party in 1979. ( His first act was to arrange for the execution of 21 cabinet members, including one of his closest associates. In 1988, he used poison gas on the Kurdish town of Halabja, killing thousands of defenseless villagers. Saddam Hussein declared that " ... they collaborated against their own country." He showed no hesitancy in using missiles against the cities of Iran during that long war. The record is replete with examples that authenticate his total disregard for human life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles
    The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Product Code #F658 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Missile Forecast Analysis 3 The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................5 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................6 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................9 Table 1 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ................................................15 Table 2 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.................................................20 Figure 1 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................25 Figure 2 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles
    [Show full text]
  • Tm 9-3305 Technical Manual Principles of Artillery
    TM 9-3305 TECHNICAL MANUAL PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4 MAY 1981 *TM 9-3305 Technical Manual HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 9-3305 Washington, DC, 4 May 1981 PRINCIPLES OF ARTILLERY WEAPONS REPORTING ERRORS AND RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS You can help improve this manual. If you find any mistakes or if you know of a way to improve the procedures, please let us know. Mail your letter, DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms), or DA Form 2028-2, located in the back of this manual, direct to: Commander, US Army Armament Materiel Readiness Command, ATTN: DRSAR-MAS, Rock Island, IL 61299. A reply will be furnished to you. Para Page PART ONE. GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1-1 1-1 2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2-1 II. Development of United States Cannon Artillery......................................................... 2-8 2-5 III. Development of Rockets and Guided Missiles ......................................................... 2-11 2-21 CHAPTER 3. CLASSIFICATION OF CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS Section I. General ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3-1 II. Current Field Artillery Weapons ................................................................................
    [Show full text]