Between West and East People of the Globular Amphora Culture in Eastern Europe: 2950-2350 Bc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BETWEEN WEST AND EAST PEOPLE OF THE GLOBULAR AMPHORA CULTURE IN EASTERN EUROPE: 2950-2350 BC Marzena Szmyt V O L U M E 8 • 2010 BALTIC-PONTIC STUDIES 61-809 Poznań (Poland) Św. Marcin 78 Tel. (061) 8536709 ext. 147, Fax (061) 8533373 EDITOR Aleksander Kośko EDITORIAL COMMITEE Sophia S. Berezanskaya (Kiev), Aleksandra Cofta-Broniewska (Poznań), Mikhail Charniauski (Minsk), Lucyna Domańska (Łódź), Viktor I. Klochko (Kiev), Jan Machnik (Kraków), Valentin V. Otroshchenko (Kiev), Petro Tolochko (Kiev) SECRETARY Marzena Szmyt Second Edition ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF EASTERN STUDIES INSTITUTE OF PREHISTORY Poznań 2010 ISBN 83-86094-07-9 (print:1999) ISBN 978-83-86094-15-8 (CD-ROM) ISSN 1231-0344 BETWEEN WEST AND EAST PEOPLE OF THE GLOBULAR AMPHORA CULTURE IN EASTERN EUROPE: 2950-2350 BC Marzena Szmyt Translated by John Comber and Piotr T. Żebrowski V O L U M E 8 • 2010 c Copyright by B-PS and Author All rights reserved Cover Design: Eugeniusz Skorwider Linguistic consultation: John Comber Prepared in Poland Computer typeset by PSO Sp. z o.o. w Poznaniu CONTENTS Editor’s Foreword5 Introduction7 I SPACE. Settlement of the Globular Amphora Culture on the Territory of Eastern Europe 16 I.1 Classification of sources . 16 I.2 Characteristics of complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits . 18 I.2.1 Complexes of class I . 18 I.2.2 Complexes of class II . 34 I.3 Range of complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits . 36 I.4 Spatial distinction between complexes of Globular Amphora culture traits. The eastern group and its indicators . 42 I.5 Spatial relations of the eastern and centralGlobular Amphora culture groups . 44 II TIME. Chronology of Settlement of Globular Amphora Culture Populations in Eastern Europe 52 II.1 Relative chronology . 52 II.1.1 Seriation of pottery from grave assemblages . 53 II.1.2 Chronological change of other selected cultural traits . 62 II.2 Absolute chronology . 63 II.2.1 Catalogue of 14C dates and their critical analysis . 63 II.2.2 Globular Amphora culture chronology in Eastern Europe . 68 II.3 Dating of East European Globular Amphora culture settlement against the absolute chronologyof the central and western groups . 71 II.3.1 Absolute chronology of the central Globular Amphora culture group . 71 II.3.2 Absolute chronology of the western Globular Amphora culture group . 78 II.3.3 Comparative chronology of Globular Amphora culture groups 80 III NEIGHBOURS. Cultural Environment of Eastern Europe asthe Context of Globular Amphora Culture Populations 86 III.1 Endogenous structures . 86 III.1.1 The Baltic Coast and Forest zone . 89 III.1.2 The Forest-Steppe zone . 99 III.1.3 The Steppe zone . 103 III.1.4 The Caucasian units . 110 4 III.2 Exogenous structures . 111 III.2.1 The Funnel Beaker culture . 111 III.2.2 The Corded Ware culture . 113 III.3 Conclusion . 118 IV CONTACTS. Relations of the Globular Amphora Culture with Other Societies of Eastern Europe 119 IV.1 Identifiers of contacts . 119 IV.1.1 List of identifying traits of intercultural contacts . 120 IV.1.2 The Baltic Coast . 128 IV.1.3 The Forest zone . 135 IV.1.4 The Forest-Steppe and Steppe zones . 142 IV.1.5 Debatable issues: The Globular Amphora culture and the Kemi-Oba, Mikhailivka I, Maykop and Caucasus Dolmen cultures . 167 IV.2 Forms of contact . 174 IV.3 The Baltic Coast . 175 IV.3.1 The Forest zone . 176 IV.3.2 The Forest-Steppe zone . 178 IV.3.3 The Steppe zone . 184 V CONTINUITY AND CHANGE. An Outline of the History of the Globular Amphora Culture Population in Eastern Europe 189 V.1 Basic features of socio-economic structures of the Globular Amphora culture people . 189 V.2 East-European topogenesis . 192 V.2.1 Dissemination stage . 192 V.2.2 Differentiation — transformation stage . 196 V.3 Participation of eastern group societies in the cultural transformations in the Vistula drainage . 203 V.4 Conclusion. The role of the Globular Amphora culture population in the history of eastern European societies . 205 Instead of epilogue 207 Annexe 1. Catalogue of Globular Amphora culture sources 209 Annexe 2. List of 14C datings used in the book 231 Plates 245 References 315 Editor’s Foreword The societies of the Globular Amphora culture (GAC) in eastern Europe have already been discussed in one of the previous volumes of the Baltic-Pontic Studies (4). The papers included in it presented new Globular Amphora culture assemblages and new information categories (in particular, new radiocarbon dates). This volume gives a full description of source material foundations relating to the presence of GAC populations in eastern Europe, from the Baltic coast in the north to the Black Sea in the south and the Dnieper-Dvina line in the east. The sources were subjected to extensive analytical procedures whose ultimate result is a new presentation of the temporal and spatial parameters of the development of GAC population settle- ment in eastern Europe. Of special interest is a detailed description of the cultural environments in which the settlement appeared as well the cultural processes in which GAC societies took part. Consequently, this book touches upon a number of controversial issues in the prehistory of the borderland between western and eastern Europe. We intend to continue this line of investigations in one of the next volumes focusing especially on the questions of social transformations characteristic of the 3rd millennium BC in the area of interest to us that need to be dealt anew. INTRODUCTION 1. SUBJECT, AIM AND SCOPE OF THIS WORK The name ‘Globular Amphora culture’ (GAC), which features in the title of this volume — one of the more humorous definitions, it must be said, in archaeological taxonomy — is of a nineteenth-century pedigree, similarly, moreover, to many other names given to archaeological cultures. It was used for the first time by the German researcher A. Götze [1900] in relation to grave assemblages in which the dominant type of vessel was the specific (key) form of two or four-handled vessel, with a globular belly. After many years of research, this term lost its original, narrow sphere of reference and became a purely conventional name, also applied to assemblages devoid of that key vessel type. The name is presently used to designate a set of traits from the field of material and symbolical culture, among which the following should be mentioned: forms, ornamentation and technology of ceramics, macrolithic flint products (axes and chisels), amber artifacts, cist graves, ritual features with animal burials etc. The majority of these traits can also be found in other taxonomical units; together, however, they compose a unique structure, which should be described as typical (‘classical’) for the GAC. More recent studies portray the dynamics of the formation of this structure, abandoning a static description and emphasising the chronological and spatial (regional) diversity of the traits which compose it and their relations [e.g. Szmyt 1996a; Müller 1997], with the result that the notion of archaeological culture in the case of the GAC approaches that of a polithetic category [Clarke 1968:248-249]. Sources of the GAC have been identified across a wide area of Central and Eastern Europe, from the Elbe basin in the west to the Dnieper in the east, and from the Baltic coast in the north to the Vltava basin, the Upper Vistula and Upper Dniester, Seret and Prut, and the Black Sea Coast in the south. Three territorial GAC groups are distinguished in this area (Fig. 1): western, central (or Polish) and eastern [Wiślański 1966:86-91; 1970:183-221; Sveshnikov 1983:Fig. 1]. The first of these covers territories in the basin of the Oder, Elbe and Vltava; the central group is concentrated in the basin of the Vistula, Warta, Noteć and Bug; and the eastern group is located in Eastern Europe, from the south-eastern Baltic coast to 8 F i g 1. Distribution of the Globular Amphora culture. Key: 1 - the western group, 2 - the central (Polish) group, 3 - the eastern group as defined by I.K. Sveshnikov, 4 - borders of the eastern group proposed herein. Source: Sveshnikov 1983, with modifications of the author. the basin of the Seret and Prut and the area between the Bug, Neman and Dnieper1. The aim of this work is the analysis and interpretation of GAC sources from the territory of Eastern Europe. Due to the present state of reference sources, I will focus on selected aspects of this question, namely on providing some form of spa- tial, temporal and cultural order to the information, drawing particular attention to the location of GAC complexes within the cultural environment of Eastern Europe. Thus, this volume does not represent a monograph of a given taxonomical unit, but rather creates a base for socio-cultural and economic interpretations, which will be the subject of a further study of a wider scope, utilising similarly-ordered sources from all three territorial groups of the GAC. In accordance with the accepted for- mula, I have also excluded anthropological questions, which, in any case, require a fresh specialised analysis. The spatial scope of this study covers the western part of Eastern Europe2, generally situated between the line of the Bug and Neman in 1It is against this spatial formula of the eastern group that I argue below. 2The categories of physiographic divisions according to Kondracki 1997, with modification. 9 the west and the Dnieper in the east. Within this territory, three principle ecolog- ical zones are distinguished: Forest (within which further distinction is made of the south-eastern Baltic coast), Forest-Steppe and Steppe [Ievlev 1991].