DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal Law and Welfare - International Perspectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal Law and Welfare - International Perspectives l Deborah Cao • Steven White More infonnution obout this series 01 hUp:/fwww.springer.comlseries/78S8 l Editors \ Animal Law and Welfare - International Perspectives 1 I I \ ~Springer • Editors Contents O.:boroh Cao Stev.:n While Law Fulures Centre Gri!Tllll l..a1v School Griffilh Univcr:;iw GriffiO\ Universi1y Brisbane. Qt.D. Au•tr:ilia Brisbllne. Qt.D, Auslr.llia 1 Introduction: Animal Proledion In an lnlm:onn~led Wolfd ......... .. Steven White and Debor~h Cao Part I General Issues In Animal Law and Welfare Sclcoce 2 Se<:ond Wave Animal Law and the Arrival of Animal Studies............ 1l Paul Waldau 3 International Animal Welfare Persp~llves, Including Wballng and Jnhwnanc Seal Killing .u a W.T.O. Publlc Morality Issue............................................. 4.5 ISSN 15)4-6781 ISSN 2214-9902 {elecoonic) Donald M. Broom lus Genlium: Comparaiivc Pc,..P"ctives on l..QW and Jus1i~ 4 ScieMe, Anln1gl Ethics and the Law ..................................................... 63 ISBN 978·3·3I9·26816·3 ISBN 978-J-~ 19-26818·7 (cBook) Joy M. Venind~r. Nicki McGr~th and Clive J.C. Phillips DOI 10.1007/978·3·319·26816-7 5 An International Treaty ror Animal Welrare........................................ 87 Libnity ofCongres& Cootrol Numbct: 201693040) David Favre SpringtT Chum Heidetberg New York Dordrc:cht London Part II Developments in Animal Protection in Different Jurisdictions 0 Sprin'->e' fruent.ationa.I Publis.lting Swi1u:rland 2016 This wort is subjccl to copyTI~tit All righ1S a.re n:s.t'f"VCd by 1hc Publis.mr. whc:lhec the: whole Of flAl1 of 6 Animal Protection Law in Australia: Bound by History..................... 109 the:: malt:rieJ is t~ncerncd. s.pccifically tttc rights of lr.Mls~tioo, n:prinlin~ re11$eOf illusin1ions. recitation. broadc-zting. reproduction on mi.cn:>film!i or in any 01~r ph)•siatl way. o.nd •mnsmission or informalion Steven White Moruie and rcuiev.d. electtonic adap~1ioo. rompvtcr softwact, or by r.imilar or dissimilar methodology now k00\1.10 or f'lcrc:lOcr dcvc:lopc:d. 7 Animal lnteresls and South African Law: The u~of t;enc-re.I Jescripti\·e naines. regis1ercd no mes, mi:ckmarks, :service ITl.UJ'b, e1c. Int.hi& ftUbllcalJol'\ The Elephant in the Room? ................................................................... 131 doc:; nol imply. C\<i:O in the flhsc™X or 11 ~pccific s1t.11ement. tl1ot such non)C& arc exempt from th(: rtlc\1ant prott:clivc law.c; und ~1.1)<1.tJons and therefore frc:c for general \ISC. David Bikhilz The publisher, ftl¢: :\Ulhors ~ml th!: <:di1ors an: snfe to ost.tinte lh.lt the o.dvia: o.nd infonnor'® in thi.s book 8 Animal Pro~tion Under lm1eli Lall'................................................... 157 arc hc:lic:,•i:d 1n be 1rue und e.ccurare nt !he dale of p\lblic;i.lion . .Neidlc:r th(: pubtidier not the all I.hots ctI.he <!ditors gh-c ~ w:tn':lTII)", C);.pn!S~ or implied, wi1h n::Spcct to the maierilll contained he«: in or for MY errors Yossi Wolfson (lf ornisr.ion.c; that mu~· hu"..: be-en olOdl!. 9 The Constillltlonal Defense ot Animals in Brazil................................. 181 Printed on acid·rrcc paper Tagore Trajano de Almeida Silva Springl!r fnt~ma1ional Publishing AO Switzerland is pan of Sprinter Sciencc+Bu9incss t-.1cdio (www. :springcr.cnm) v vi Contents 10 Regulatory Capture and lbe Welfare of Fann Contributors Animals In Australia............................................................................... 195 Jed Goodfellow 11 Blackfls/1 and Public Outcry: A Unique Polllical and ugal Opportunity for Fundamental Change to lhe Leg81 Protection of Marine Mammals in. Che Unl!A!d States................................................................................. 237 Joan E.. Schaffner 12 Wildlife Crime.! and Legal Proledion of Wiidiife in China................ 263 Deborah Cao Index................................................................................................................. 279 David Bilcbiu Depanmcnl of Public Law, University of Johannesburg. Johannesburg, South Africa Donald M. Uroom Centre for Animal Welfare nnd Anthrozoology. Dcparunent of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge. Cambridge, UK Debomb Cao Low Futures Centre. Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australiu David Favre Animal Legal & Historical Center, Michigan Sllltc Univctsity College of uw, East Lansing, Ml, USA Jed Goodfellow Dcpanment of Law, Mncqunric University, Sydney. NSW, lwsualia Nicki McGrath Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Vetcrinnry Science, Uniwn:ity of Queenslund, Gamon. QLD, Australia Clive J.C. Phillips Centre for Animol Welfare and Elltics, School of Veterinary Science. Univcrsi1y of Queensland. Gatton, QLD, Australia Joan E. Schaftner George Washington University Law School, Washing1on. DC. USA Tugore Trajano de Almeida Silva lirJdcntes Univcrsily, Arocaju, Sergipe. Bra7.il Joy M. Verrlndcr Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University ofQueensland. Gatton, QLD. Au.mafia Paul Waldau Canisius College, Buffalo, NY. USA Steven Whlle Grifith Law School. Griffith University, Brisbone, QLD, Australia Yossi Woltson Allorncy-at·Lnw, Jerusalem, Israel vii Chapter2 Second Wave Animal Law and the Arrival of Animal Studies Paul Waldau Abstract Mony socie1ic..~ today rclle.:11hat animal protectionists nre going beyond efforts 10 establish fundamenllll protections or the kind signaled by ccnns like "ooi­ mol rights.'' "animol welfore:· and even "animal libermioo." This Chapter uses four interrelated questions 10 explore this new stage of animal law: ( l) how should ani­ mal law courses in low school proceed given the obvious interdisciplinary reach of the larger field of Animal S1udies1; (2) wha1 is the place in second wave animol lnw for onsw~rs 10 tl1e roo1 queslion "who, what ore 'animals'?": (3) why is !he field of "Animal Swdies" important 10 legal cducotion and. more broadly. education a.< a whole?; and. (4) Whol roles have personal conncc1ion wilh and meeting of nonhu­ man animals played in firs! wove animal law, and whot roles might they ploy in second wave animal low, the larg~r field of Animal Studies and i1s sub-disciplines. and 1hc educotionol mega·ftcld.~ we know os "the humanities" ond "the sciences'"! 2.1 Introduction How do we go about our ntlempl to sec the future of animal law'! We COil speak rather specifically. ofcourse, about the near-term projccls on which we will focus in lhc cominl! few yearr.. But what I'm ofter is our need 10 assess the possible direc­ tions and shape of animal low decades 0111 i11to the ftmtre, which takes an altogether different imagination than docs looking only DI possible projocL~ in the coming years. To meet this need. I examine tlie burgeoning academic field known as "Animal Srndies." but which is known variously under nlhcr names such as "Anlhrowclogy," and "Human-Animal Studies" (there arc at least o holf-dozen other options tho! I do not list here. For further discussions, see Woldou 2013). In order 10 see why the field of law and the subfield of animol law need perspectives from Animal Studies, I employ whal l will refer 10 as three lenses- these include a gencralil.alion, a warn­ ing aboul social movements. and an imaginative image to holp us see the terrain we W;tlk as ethical crealuro$. Tlte generali!ario11 is this pithy observntion by Robert P. Wald•u (611 Canislus College. Buffalo. NY. USA •·mail: pwaldn•@gmoil.«>m O Spring<r lnlorn•tional PublishinH Swllwland 2016 I l P. Coo. S. \Vhi1e (eds.). Atu'm.al Law nnd 'V.ef(ur< - lnternntionnt Ptnpecti\'f!s, Jus. Gcntium: Comp.lr:U:isc f..:rsp«:thies on Law nnd Justice .53. DOI I0.10071978·3-3!9·26818-7_2 12 P. W•ldou 2 Second \Ya\•e Animal Law 11nd 1hc Arrl\•:il of An.imaf Studies 13 Cover ( 1986): "Law is rile projection ofan imagined faturt 11pooi reality." The wam· ret.lion~hips to other living beings-lhci:c signs arc oil about us in media, an, busi· ing is embodied in this obserYlllion about social movcme.nts: "It's hard enough to neis opportunities, scholarship of mt1ny kinds. religious communities. local and start a rei'Oilllion, even hanlu still /Q mstain it. and hatdesl ofall to win ii Bill it is Slllle government, natianal policy debates. •nd on and on. only aftcrwordJ, 011ce >ff'w won, tl1a1 rhe real difficiilties b~in." ' The lhird lens is Thi~ rich. cxtrnordinary ferment in humans' relations wilb other li~ing beings a simple, lhreo-word phrase !hat I take to be an imaginu1ive image luring us into a hus three important backgrounds or con1exts. One is lhat tbe changes in the way we heahhy in1ersection wilh lives beyond our species-this image is "the animal invilll­ think and feel about "animals" arc taking place even •s much else is in ferment in lion ." This image suggests ~>at olher animals h~vc lives 1ha1, ir we nolicc and l!lke our culture. Another background or conli:J<t for increasing concern for nonhuman lhem seriously, call out not only to the deep cthicol instincts so characteristic and animals i~ that ~1e increase takes place against prevailing human·cenl~rcdncsses definin1: of human lives bm alsn to our d~ire for communion or relationship with lhal are pervasive and often allogcther unhcnllhy. Finnlly, silifl< in auitudes about I.he huger life communi1y. Other-than-human animals invile us to inquire about anlmal issues are going forward even though we h•ve very SC1lous unresolved 1hcm, 10 taku them seriously, to lake enjoyment in oui similurilles and dilTerences. human problems. I toke it for granted 1hot todoy there is a greol deal of first·nlle and even to relo1e to !hem os communicy members. Using these lenses, this chapter evidence for three claims: (I) that change of mwiy kinds is happening all about us tries 10 look al both mid- o.nd lunger-tenn issues. So I will speculate about the future (lhi ~ has been going on forcenlurie.<, of course), (2) that our society hos an as1onish· of animal law oul to, say, the yeBI 2030 and also about longer term issues rcg8J'ding ing number or fe<11un:s that attest we are decidedly "human-centcrcd," and (3) 1ha1 the shall" or anlmal Jaw at die end of this twenty-first century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COURT of APPEALS of the STATE of NEW YORK ------X in the Matter of a Proceeding Under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
    COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on Index Nos. 162358/15 behalf of TOMMY, (New York County); Petitioner-Appellant, 150149/16 (New York -against- County) PATRICK C. LAVERY, individually and as an of Circle L Trailer Sales, Inc., DIANE LAVERY, and CIRCLE L TRAILER SALES, INC., Respondents-Respondents, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of KIKO, Petitioner-Appellant, -against- CARMEN PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., CHRISTIE E. PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., and THE PRIMATE SANCTUARY, INC., Respondents-Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Steven M. Wise, Esq. 5 Dunhill Road (of the Bar of the State of New Hyde Park, New York Massachusetts) 11040 By Permission of the Court (516) 747-4726 5195 NW 112th Terrace [email protected] Coral Springs, Florida 33076 (954) 648-9864 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ................................................................................... iv Argument .................................................................................................... 1 I. Preliminary Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Postgraduate/Distance Learning Assignment Coversheet & Feedback Form
    Postgraduate/Distance Learning Assignment coversheet & feedback form THIS SHEET MUST BE THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ASSIGNMENT YOU ARE SUBMITTING (DO NOT SEND AS A SEPARATE FILE) For completion by the student: Student Name: SAMANTHA JANE HOLLAND Student University Email: [email protected] Module code: Student ID number: Educational support needs: 1001693 Yes/No Module title: DISSERTATION Assignment title: OTHAs AND ENVIRONMENT IN ANIMAL ETHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY: ONTOLOGY AND ETHICAL MOTIVATION BEYOND THE DICHOTOMIES OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM Assignment due date: 2 April 2013 This assignment is for the 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th module of the degree N/A Word count: 22,000 WORDS I confirm that this is my original work and that I have adhered to the University policy on plagiarism. Signed …………………………………………………………… Assignment Mark 1st Marker’s Provisional mark 2nd Marker’s/Moderator’s provisional mark External Examiner’s mark (if relevant) Final Mark NB. All marks are provisional until confirmed by the Final Examination Board. For completion by Marker 1 : Comments: Marker’s signature: Date: For completion by Marker 2/Moderator: Comments: Marker’s Signature: Date: External Examiner’s comments (if relevant) External Examiner’s Signature: Date: ii OTHAs AND ENVIRONMENT IN ANIMAL ETHICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY: ONTOLOGY AND ETHICAL MOTIVATION BEYOND THE DICHOTOMIES OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM Samantha Jane Holland March 2013 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA Nature University of Wales, Trinity Saint David Master’s Degrees by Examination and Dissertation Declaration Form. 1. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M
    Boston College Law Review Volume 43 Article 2 Issue 3 Number 3 5-1-2002 Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M. Wise Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Wise, Rattling the Cage Defended, 43 B.C.L. Rev. 623 (2002), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol43/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RATTLING THE CAGE DEFENDED STEVEN M. WISE* Abstract: In Rattling the Cage: Toward Levi Rights for Animals, the author advocated basic legal rights—specifically common law rights—for chimpanzees, bonobos, and other nonhuman animals. In this Article, the author responds to many of the major criticisms of Rattling the Cage. The author confronts critics of his historical arguments for legal rights for nonhuman animals, tracing those arguments through ancient philosophy and nineteenth century English statutes. The author also expands upon his legal arguments for animal rights, reexamining various theories of rights and justifications for treating animals as property, Finally, borrowing from his upcoming book Drawing the Line: Science and The Case for Animal Rights, the author defends his advocacy of legal rights for nonhuman animals based on the relative autonomy nonhuman animals possess. INTRODUCTION "The 'animal rights' movement is gathering steam and Steven Wise is one of the pistons."l Thus Judge Richard Posner began a Yale Law Journal review of my book, Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals, published in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]
  • The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap
    bs_bs_banner Journal of Applied Philosophy,Vol.31, No. 2, 2014 doi: 10.1111/japp.12051 The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap OSCAR HORTA ABSTRACT The argument from species overlap has been widely used in the literature on animal ethics and speciesism. However, there has been much confusion regarding what the argument proves and what it does not prove, and regarding the views it challenges.This article intends to clarify these confusions, and to show that the name most often used for this argument (‘the argument from marginal cases’) reflects and reinforces these misunderstandings.The article claims that the argument questions not only those defences of anthropocentrism that appeal to capacities believed to be typically human, but also those that appeal to special relations between humans. This means the scope of the argument is far wider than has been thought thus far. Finally, the article claims that, even if the argument cannot prove by itself that we should not disregard the interests of nonhuman animals, it provides us with strong reasons to do so, since the argument does prove that no defence of anthropocentrism appealing to non-definitional and testable criteria succeeds. 1. Introduction The argument from species overlap, which has also been called — misleadingly, I will argue — the argument from marginal cases, points out that the criteria that are com- monly used to deprive nonhuman animals of moral consideration fail to draw a line between human beings and other sentient animals, since there are also humans who fail to satisfy them.1 This argument has been widely used in the literature on animal ethics for two purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 21, No. 2 Fall 2010 ______
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS NEWSLETTER _____________________________________________________ Volume 21, No. 2 Fall 2010 _____________________________________________________ GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ISEE Membership: ISEE membership dues are now due annually by Earth Day—22 April—of each year. Please pay your 2010-2011 dues now if you have not already done so. You can either use the form on the last page of this Newsletter to mail a check to ISEE Treasurer Marion Hourdequin, or you can use PayPal with a credit card from the membership page of the ISEE website at: <http://www.cep.unt.edu/iseememb.html>. “Old World and New World Perspectives on Environmental Philosophy,” Eighth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Environmental Ethics (ISEE), Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 14-17 June 2011: Please see the full call for abstracts and conference details in the section CONFERENCES AND CALLS below. Abstracts are due by 6 December 2010. ISEE Newsletter Going Exclusively Electronic: Starting with the Spring 2011 issue (Volume 22, no. 1), hardcopies of the ISEE Newsletter will no longer be produced and mailed to ISEE members via snail mail. ISEE members will continue to receive the Newsletter electronically as a pdf and, of course, can print their own hardcopies. New ISEE Newsletter Editor: Starting with the Spring 2011 issue, the new ISEE Newsletter Editor will be William Grove-Fanning. Please submit all ISEE Newsletter items to him at: <[email protected]>. Welcome William! ISEE Newsletter Issues: There was no 2010 Spring/Summer issue of the ISEE Newsletter. Because of the ISEE Newsletter Editor transition from Mark Woods to William Grove-Fanning, there will be no Winter 2011 issue of the ISEE Newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • PHIL 221 – Ethical Theory (3 Credits) Course Description
    PHIL 221 – Ethical Theory (3 credits) Course Description: This course focuses on theories of morality rather than on contemporary moral issues (that is the topic of PHIL 120). That means that we will primarily be preoccupied with exploring what it means for an action—or a person—to be “good”. We will attempt to answer this question by looking at a mix of historical and contemporary texts primarily drawn from the Western European tradition, but also including some works from China and pre-colonial central America. We will begin by asking whether there are any universal and objectively valid moral rules, and chart several attempts to answer in both the affirmative and the negative: relativism, egoism, virtue ethics, consequentialism, deontology, the ethics of care, and contractarianism. We will consider the relationship between morality and the law, and whether morality is linked to human happiness. Finally, we will consider arguments for and against the idea that moral facts actually exist. Schedule of Readings Week 1 Introduction What are we trying to do? Charles L. Stevenson – The Nature of Ethical Disagreement Tom Regan – How Not to Answer Moral Questions Week 2 Relativism What counts as good depends on the moral standards of the group doing the evaluating. Mary Midgley – Trying Out One’s New Sword Martha Nussbaum – Judging Other Cultures: The Case of Genital Mutilation Plato – The Myth of Gyges (Republic II) Week 3 Egoism What’s good is just what’s good for me. Mencius – Mengzi (excerpts) James Rachels – Egoism and Moral Skepticism Week 4 Virtue Ethics Morality depends on having a virtuous character.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Of" Science and Poetry" by M. Midgley
    Swarthmore College Works Philosophy Faculty Works Philosophy 10-1-2003 Review Of "Science And Poetry" By M. Midgley Hans Oberdiek Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-philosophy Part of the Philosophy Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Hans Oberdiek. (2003). "Review Of "Science And Poetry" By M. Midgley". Ethics. Volume 114, Issue 1. 187-189. DOI: 10.1086/376710 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-philosophy/121 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mary Midgley, Science and Poetry Science and Poetry by Mary. Midgley, Review by: Reviewed by Hans Oberdiek Ethics, Vol. 114, No. 1 (October 2003), pp. 187-189 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/376710 . Accessed: 09/06/2015 16:15 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Research Paper Series
    Legal Research Paper Series NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY By Rita K. Lomio and J. Paul Lomio Research Paper No. 6 October 2005 Robert Crown Law Library Crown Quadrangle Stanford, California 94305-8612 NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRPAHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY I. Books II. Reports III. Law Review Articles IV. Newspaper Articles (including legal newspapers) V. Sound Recordings and Films VI. Web Resources I. Books RESEARCH GUIDES AND BIBLIOGRAPHIES Hoffman, Piper, and the Harvard Student Animal Legal Defense Fund The Guide to Animal Law Resources Hollis, New Hampshire: Puritan Press, 1999 Reference KF 3841 G85 “As law students, we have found that although more resources are available and more people are involved that the case just a few years ago, locating the resource or the person we need in a particular situation remains difficult. The Guide to Animal Law Resources represents our attempt to collect in one place some of the resources a legal professional, law professor or law student might want and have a hard time finding.” Guide includes citations to organizations and internships, animal law court cases, a bibliography, law schools where animal law courses are taught, Internet resources, conferences and lawyers devoted to the cause. The International Institute for Animal Law A Bibliography of Animal Law Resources Chicago, Illinois: The International Institute for Animal Law, 2001 KF 3841 A1 B53 Kistler, John M. Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2000 HV 4708 K57 Bibliography divided into six subject areas: Animal Rights: General Works, Animal Natures, Fatal Uses of Animals, Nonfatal Uses of Animals, Animal Populations, and Animal Speculations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Guardianship of Animals.Pdf
    Edna Cardozo Dias Lawyer, PhD in Law, Legal Consultant and University Professor The Legal Guardianship of Animals Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais 2020 © 2020 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS Editor Edna Cardozo Dias Final art Aderivaldo Sousa Santos Review Maria Celia Aun Cardozo, Edna The Legal Guardianship of Animals / — Edna Cardozo Dias: Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais - 2020 - 3ª edition. 346 p. 1. I.Título. Printed in Brazil All rights reserved Requests for this work Internet site shopping: amazon.com.br and amazon.com. Email: [email protected] 2 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS I dedicate this book To the common mother of all beings - the Earth - which contains the essence of all that lives, which feeds us from all joys, in the hope that this work may inaugurate a new era, marked by a firm purpose to restore the animal’s dignity, and the human being commitment with an ethic of life. THE LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP OF A NIMALS 3 Appreciate Professor Arthur Diniz, advisor of my doctoral thesis, defended at the Federal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, which was the first thesis on animal law in Brazil in February 2000, introducing this new branch of law in the academic and scientific world, starting the elaboration of a “Animal Rights Theory”. 4 EDNA CARDOZO DIAS Sumário Chapter 1 - PHILOSOPHY AND ANIMALS .................................................. 15 1.1 The Greeks 1.1.1 The Pre-Socratic 1.1.2 The Sophists 1.1.3 The Socratic Philosophy 1.1.4 Plato 1.1.5 Peripathetism 1.1.6 Epicureanism 1.1.7 The Stoic Philosophy 1.2 The Biblical View - The Saints and the Animals 1.2.1 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Princípios Do Direito Animal Brasileiro – Vicente De Paula Ataide Junior
    PRINCÍPIOS DO DIREITO ANIMAL BRASILEIRO PRINCIPLES OF THE BRAZILIAN ANIMAL LAW Recebido: 07.06.2019 Aprovado: 25.03.2020 Vicente de Paula Ataide Junior Pós-doutor em Direito Animal UFBA. Doutor pela UFPR. Professor UFPR. Juiz Federal titular no Paraná. EMAIL: [email protected] LATTES: wwws.cnpq.br/cvlattesweb/PKG_MENU.menu?f_ cod=D51B4D1287369F6BD0B5BAA2A7BD4125# ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-9928 RESUMO: É significativa a carência de estudos doutrinários sobre a dogmática e a principiologia do Direito Animal. Nesse contexto, o artigo tem o objetivo de lançar uma proposta de princípios jurídicos, exclusivos e não-exclusivos (compartilhados com outros ramos jurídicos), para o Direito Animal, extraídos do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, sobretudo do estrato constitucional, com o auxílio da teoria dos princípios de Humberto Ávila. Para tanto, enfrenta duas questões epistemológicas preliminares: a fixação da denominação e do conceito da disciplina jurídica estudada, que permitam bem identificar o objeto desse novo campo da enciclopédia jurídica. Direito Animal é a denominação proposta para fins de uniformização terminológica. O conceito para a disciplina leva em consideração o reconhecimento da sua autonomia em relação ao Direito Ambiental. Nesse particular, procede-se à desconstrução analítica do conceito proposto, para permitir a análise de seus elementos essenciais. Conforme se propõe, os princípios exclusivos ou típicos do Direito Animal são os seguintes: 1) princípio da dignidade animal; 2) princípio da universalidade; 3) princípio da primazia da liberdade natural e 4) princípio da educação animalista. Por sua vez, os princípios não-exclusivos ou compartilhados do Direito Animal têm uma listagem mais aberta, podendo ser indicados, ao menos, os seguintes: 1) princípio da precaução; 2) princípio da democracia participativa; 3) princípio do acesso à justiça e 4) princípio da proibição do retrocesso.
    [Show full text]
  • Jm Coetzee and Animal Rights
    J.M. COETZEE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS: ELIZABETH COSTELLO’S CHALLENGE TO PHILOSOPHY Richard Alan Northover SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PRETORIA, 0002, SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: Professor David Medalie OCTOBER 2009 © University of Pretoria Abstract The thesis relates Coetzee’s focus on animals to his more familiar themes of the possibility of fiction as a vehicle for serious ethical issues, the interrogation of power and authority, a concern for the voiceless and the marginalised, a keen sense of justice and the question of secular salvation. The concepts developed in substantial analyses of The Lives of Animals and Disgrace are thereafter applied to several other works of Coetzee. The thesis attempts to position J.M. Coetzee within the animal rights debate and to assess his use of his problematic persona, Elizabeth Costello, who controversially uses reason to attack the rationalism of the Western philosophical tradition and who espouses the sympathetic imagination as a means of developing respect for animals. Costello’s challenge to the philosophers is problematised by being traced back to Plato’s original formulation of the opposition between philosophers and poets. It is argued that Costello represents a fallible Socratic figure who critiques not reason per se but an unqualified rationalism. This characterisation of Costello explains her preoccupation with raising the ethical awareness of her audience, as midwife to the birth of ideas, and perceptions of her as a wise fool, a characterisation that is confirmed by the use of Bakhtin’s notion of the Socratic dialogue as one of the precursors of the modern novel.
    [Show full text]