Sample of Organizations Participating in Consolidated Appeals
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS ACF Fundación Seraphim MACCA UNAIDS ACF ACTED Handicap International Medair UNDP ACTED ADRA HELP NPA UNESCO ADRA AVSI IMC NRC UNFPA AVSI CARE INTERSOS OCHA UN-HABITAT CARE CARITAS IOM OHCHR UNHCR CARITAS CRS IRC Oxfam America UNICEF CRS Première CWS IRIN WFP CWS PAHO (WHO) DRC Islamic Relief Worldwide WHO DRC Save the Children FAO LWF World Vision FAO Solidarités International 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE I: REQUIREMENTS PER CLUSTER .................................................................................................. 3 TABLE II: REQUIREMENTS PER ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................... 4 2. CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES ..................................................................... 5 2.1 CONTEXT AND RESPONSE TO DATE ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES AND NEEDS ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 12 1. Collective Centres and Camp Management and Shelters& NFIs ........................................................... 12 2. Water and Sanitation .............................................................................................................................. 13 3. Food Assistance ...................................................................................................................................... 14 4. Health ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 5. Agriculture .............................................................................................................................................. 15 6. Education ................................................................................................................................................ 16 7. Protection ............................................................................................................................................... 16 8. Early Recovery ....................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 SCENARIOS .............................................................................................................................................. 18 3. RESPONSE PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 19 3.1 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE ......................................................................... 19 3.2. CLUSTER RESPONSE PLAN ............................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1. CCCM and SHELTER & NFI ............................................................................................................ 21 3.2.2. WATER, SANITATION AND HEALTH (WASH) ............................................................................... 23 3.2.3 FOOD ASSISTANCE .......................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.4 HEALTH ............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.2.5 AGRICULTURE ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.6 EDUCATION ...................................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.7 PROTECTION AND SECURITY ........................................................................................................ 29 3.2.8 EARLY RECOVERY ........................................................................................................................... 31 4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................. 32 ANNEX I. LIST OF PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................... 34 TABLE III: LIST OF APPEAL PROJECTS (GROUPED BY CLUSTER), WITH FUNDING STATUS OF EACH ............. 34 TABLE IV: TOTAL FUNDING TO DATE PER DONOR TO PROJECTS LISTED IN THE APPEAL ............................. 38 TABLE VI: TOTAL HUMANITARIAN FUNDING TO DATE PER DONOR (APPEAL PLUS OTHER)* ......................... 39 TABLE VII: HUMANITARIAN FUNDING TO DATE PER DONOR TO PROJECTS NOT LISTED IN THE APPEAL ........ 40 ANNEX II. IFRC PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY APPEAL ................................................................................ 41 ANNEX III. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 52 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net. Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from www.reliefweb.int/fts. iii iv 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The arrival of Tropical Depression 12E in El Salvador on 10 October 2011 brought unprecedented heavy rainfall, accumulating more rain than Hurricane Mitch in 1998, and exceeding rain levels registered in the last 50 years. Due to the persistence of the storm, two low-pressure systems were generated, leading to torrential rains for more than ten days, causing severe flooding and landslides in 181 municipalities of most of the country’s 14 departments, affecting more than 500,000 people and flooding 2,000 km2, equivalent to 10% of the country. This record-breaking rainfall levels caused all of the Revised Flash Appeal for El Salvador: nation’s dams to reach their maximum capacity levels, thus Key parameters triggering a rise in the discharge volume to 9,000 cubic Duration October – April 2011 metres per second, further flooding populated zones and Affected 500,000 people affected crops downstream, similar to what occurred with the population devastating Hurricane Mitch in 1998. Data from the Flood-affected regions Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources shows Areas along the coastline and that the levels of rainfall between 10 and 18 October targeted by the volcanic chain, the reached 1,500 millimetres. El Salvador’s historical annual Flash Appeal east and centre of the average rainfalls are 1,800mm. With 2,378 mm due to the country Shelter, Food Assistance, DT12E, 2011 in El Salvador is the second highest rainfall WASH, Health, Key sectors year. Agriculture, Education, for response Protection, Early Due to the extent and magnitude of the impact, as well as Recovery the severe damage caused by rains in agricultural areas and 125,223 for food infrastructure, El Salvador now faces one of the greatest 250,000 for health Key target disasters in its history. 29,355 for agriculture beneficiaries 304,238 for education (approximate According to the Economic Commission for Latin America 24,379 for protection figures) and the Caribbean, damages and losses are estimated at 10,335 for shelter over $840 million, equivalent to almost 4% of the gross 50,000 for WASH Funding domestic product. This figure takes into account around Total funding requested per $362 million of damages to assets and around $ 478 million requested beneficiary of losses due to the reduction of economic activity, Approximately $14,781,209 including production losses and higher service costs. $49 Sectors most affected are agriculture, road infrastructure, housing and social infrastructure (health and education). The consolidated report of damages and losses closed with 35 people dead, 59,854 people evacuated, 54,903 people in emergency shelter, a total of 669 collective centres were open during the emergency, in nine of the 14 departments of the country. Estimated flooded homes total 20,000, as well as 10,186 water wells, which 1,163 were destroyed and 9,082 damaged; at least 165,000 people will require food assistance and over 265,000 small holders who have lost part of their food crops will face serious livelihood challenges in the coming months. A total of 3,592 families require urgent intervention to provide them safer temporary shelter or repairing kits. To date only the families that have nowhere to go are still hosted in eight collective camps. Although the Government of El Salvador has quickly and effectively responded to the evolving emergency and swift support action has been ensured by national, municipal and community-based authorities, thus averting greater loss of life, there are still significant humanitarian gaps and needs in the response that this appeal seeks to meet. This Flash Appeal aims to solicit and mobilize from the international community additional and complementary support to the Government’s effort of maintaining basic standards of humanitarian aid, to effectively targeting the most immediate humanitarian needs and most vulnerable sectors of the affected population. Since the launch of the Flash Appeal, the appealing agencies have focused on coordinating the response of the humanitarian community through the activation of Clusters (Agriculture, Collective Centres and Shelters & Non-Food Items, Education, Food Assistance,