DOCSLIB.ORG

State Route 241 Foothill South and Tesoro Extensions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Route 241 Foothill South and Tesoro Extensions (' STATE ROUTE 241241 FOOTHILLFOOTIIILL SOUTHSOUTII ANDAND TESOROTESORO EXTENSIONS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This State Route 241 Foothill SouthSouth and Tesoro ExtensionsExtensions Settlement Agreement ("Agreement"), dated for referencereferenoe purposespurposes onlyonly asas ofNovemberof November /oAo ,2016, 2016, isis mademade byby and among, the following Parties: (i) Foothill/EasternFoothillÆastern Transportation ConidorCorridor Agency ("TCA"), a Joint Powers Authority comprised ofof thethe CountyCounty ofof OrangeOrange andand the cities of Anaheim, Dana Point, Irvine,kvine, Lake Forest, MissionMission Viejo,Viejo, Orange,Orange, RanchoRancho SantaSanta Margarita, SanSan Clemente,Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, Tustin andand Yorba Linda;Linda; (ii)(ii) National Audubon Society,Society, a New York nonprofit corporation dba AudubonAudubon California,California, CaliforniaCalifornia Coastal ProtectionProtectionNetwork, Network, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,corporation, CaliforniaCalifornia StateState Parks Foundation, aa CaliforniaCalifomia nonprofit public benefit corporation, Defenders ofof Wildlife,Wildlife, aa District of Columbia nonprofit corporation,cotporation, Endangered Habitats League,League, aa CaliforniaCalifornia nonprofitnonprofit public benefit corporation,corporation, Laguna Greenbelt, Inc., a CaliforniaCalifomia nonprofit public benefitbenefit corporation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., a New York nonprofit corporation, Orange County Coastkeeper, a CaliforniaCalifomia nonprofit public benefit corporation, SeaSea andand SageSage Audubon Society, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, SierraSierra Club, aa CaliforniaCalifornia nonprofit public benefit corporation, Surfrider Foundation, a CaliforniaCalifomia nonprofit public benefit corporation, and WiLDCOAST-COSTASALVAjE,TI/iLDCOAST-COSTASALVAjE, a California nonprofit benefit corporation (each an "SSOC"SSOC Member" and collectively the "Save"Save San Onofre Coalition" or "SSOC"); andand (iii)(iii) thethe PeoplePeople of the State of California ex rel. Kamala D. Harris, AttorneyAttomey GeneralGeneral ("People"), the Native American Heritage Commission ("NAHC"),("NAI{C"), and the CaliforniaCalifornia State Park and Recreation Commission ("CSPRC") (each aa"PaÍty" "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"). As used in this Agreement, the terms "Parties" andand "SSOC"SSOC Members"Members" includeinclude thethe officers,offîcers, governinggoverning boards, agents, and employees of each Party or SSOC Member. "Party""Party''does does notnot includeinclude thethe membersmembers of any membership organization that is a Party who areare not also officers, members of the governing board, agents or employees of the Party. The parties to each of the following actions, which thisthis AgreementAgreement seeks to resolve, shallshall file stipulations in substantially the same form as Exhibit A ("Stipulation("stipulation forfor Consolidation and Joinder") to consolidate forfor purposespulposes ofofjudgment judgment thosethose mattersmatters and permit the permissive joinder of Defenders of WildlifeV/ildlife andand WiLDCOAST-COSTASALVAjE, which areare SSOCSSOC Members: CaliforniaCaliþrnia State Parks Foundation etet al.al. v.v. FoothillFoothill Eastern/Transportation CorridorCorridor AgenqtAgency et al., San Diego County SuperiorSuperior CourtCourt CaseCase No. GIN051194GIN05 I I 94 and People of the State of CaliforniaCaffirnía et al. v. Foothill/Eastern TransportationTransportøtion CorridorCorridor Agency et ø/.,al., San Diego County Superior Court, Case No. GIN051371GIN05 I 3 7 1 (consolidated withwith CaseCase No. GI51194)GI5 I I 94) (hereafter the *2006 "2006 CEQA Lawsuits"); CaliforniaCaffirnia State Parks Foundation et al. v. FoothillFoothill Eastern/Transportation Corridor Agency et al., San Diego County Superior Court CaseCase No. 37- 2013-00049797-CU-WM-CTL2013-00049797-CU-WÌIr/-CTL andand People of thethe StateState ofof California,Caliþmiø, ex rel. AttornqtAttorney GeneralGeneral Kamala D. Harris v. Foothill/Eastern .TransportationTransportation CorridorCorridor Agency et al., Case No. 37-2013-37-2013- 00050001-CU-WM-NC00050001-CU-\ryM-NC (consolidated with Case No. 37-2013-00049797-CU-WM-CTL)37-2013-00049797-CU-WM-CTL) (hereafter the "2013 CEQA Lawsuits");Lawsuits"); andand Native American Heritage Commission v. Foothill/Eastern TransportationTransportatíon Corridor Agency, San Diego Superior Court, Case No. GIN051370 ("NAHC("NAHC Lawsuit"). Thereafter, the Parties shallshall file a stipulation for entry of judgmentjudgment and ("Stipulation for Judgment") in the lowestlowest numbered case stipulating to the entry of final judgment and attaching a proposed final judgment incorporating the terms set forth in this Agreement (“Final Judgment”). The Stipulation for Judgment shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit B. Upon entry of the proposed Final Judgment, this Agreement shall be enforceable as an order of the court. This Agreement shall, however, be binding and enforceable as a contractual settlement agreement on and after the Effective Date, regardless of whether the court enters the Final Judgment. RECITALS A. This Agreement arises from TCA’s prior proposal to extend State Route 241 (“SR 241”) beyond its current terminus at Oso Parkway (“SR 241 Extension Project”). Actions taken by TCA related to this proposal have been subject to a number of pending lawsuits by SSOC Members, and by the People, NAHC, and CSPRC (collectively, “State Parties”). SSOC and TCA have also threatened litigation over actions taken by other public entities related to the extension of SR 241. By this Agreement, the Parties seek to finally resolve the pending lawsuits and potential lawsuits, avoid certain future claims, provide certainty as to the protection of certain natural and cultural resources, and establish a framework by which an alignment for the SR 241 Extension Project, as defined herein, can be identified, evaluated, and potentially advanced in a manner that is consistent with applicable laws and meets the transportation needs of TCA. B. On February 23, 2006, TCA certified a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (“2006 SEIR”) for the SR 241 Foothill South Extension and approved an alignment (the A7C-FEC-M-Initial Alternative, also known as the Green Alignment) in the DEIS/SEIR for the South Orange County Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Project (“2006 Approvals”). C. Thereafter, the 2006 SEIR and 2006 Approvals were challenged under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”) by certain SSOC Members, and by the People and the CSPRC, in the 2006 CEQA Lawsuits. The NAHC also filed the NAHC Lawsuit, seeking to enjoin construction, development, and permitting of the alignment approved by the 2006 Approvals under Public Resources Code §§ 5097.94 and 5097.97. D. In 2008, the California Coastal Commission determined that the alignment approved by TCA in 2006 was inconsistent with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.) (“CZMA”) due to its significant impacts on coastal resources and the availability of feasible alternatives to the alignment, and therefore objected to TCA’s CZMA consistency determination. On appeal, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce upheld the Coastal Commission’s objection. E. On April 18, 2013, TCA approved an Addendum to the 2006 SEIR (“2013 Addendum”) and approved an extension of SR 241 to Cow Camp Road (“2013 Approvals”), also known as the Tesoro Extension. The 2013 Approvals and 2013 Addendum were challenged under CEQA in the 2013 CEQA Lawsuits, filed by certain SSOC Members and by the People. 2 F. Through a series of decisions made between June 2013 and March 2015, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) denied TCA’s application for waste discharge requirements under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code §§ 13000 et seq.) for the Tesoro Extension (“WDR Denial”). On February 16, 2016, TCA and RWQCB entered into a tolling agreement by which the parties agreed to extend the time for TCA to file a legal challenge to the WDR Denial (as amended, “RWQCB Tolling Agreement”). G. In 2016, construction commenced on Los Patrones Parkway (formerly known as F Street), a county arterial road between Oso Parkway and Cow Camp Road occupying the same general footprint as the proposed Tesoro Extension. Construction of Los Patrones is expected to be complete in 2018. H. Between February and June, 2016 the County of Orange took certain actions resulting in the approval of the Oso Parkway Bridge project (“Bridge Project”) proposed by TCA, which would allow for a direct connection between SR 241 and Los Patrones Parkway under Oso Parkway. On May 2, 2016, SSOC, County of Orange, and TCA entered into an agreement by which the parties agreed to extend the time for SSOC to challenge the Bridge Project (as amended, “Bridge Tolling Agreement”). I. TCA is considering a mobility improvement project to address concerns regarding congestion on the Interstate 5 freeway in South Orange County. Mobility improvements would be conducted in a manner that would extend SR 241 utilizing an alignment that minimizes environmental and cultural resource impacts, is economically feasible and practicable, and is consistent with applicable state and federal environmental and cultural resources laws. To achieve these objectives, TCA will only build or fund an alignment that is located outside of the Avoidance Area, as defined in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning for a Coastal City: San Clemente’S Local Coastal Program
    PLANNING FOR A COASTAL CITY: SAN CLEMENTE’S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM A Professional Project presented to California Coastal Commission, City of San Clemente, and the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning by Atousa Zolfaghari May 2013 © 2013 Atousa Zolfaghari ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ! ""! COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Planning for a Coastal City: San Clemente’s Local Coastal Program AUTHOR: Atousa Zolfaghari DATE SUBMITTED: May 2013 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Dr. Kelly Main, Assistant Professor, City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Chris Clark, JD, Lecturer, City and Regional Planning COMMITTEE MEMBER: Jeff Hook, Principal Planner at City of San Clemente COMMITTEE MEMBER: Jim Pechous, City Planner at City of San Clemente ! """! ABSTRACT PLANNING FOR A COASTAL CITY: SAN CLEMENTE’S LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Atousa Zolfaghari This professional project assesses current conditions and regulations within San Clemente’s Coastal Zone, and provides recommendations to the City and California Coastal Commission through a draft Land Use Plan. The amended Land Use Plan will be included in the certified Local Coastal Program, which will govern decisions that determine the short and long-term conservation and use of coastal resources within San Clemente’s Coastal Zone. Local Coastal Programs (LCPs) are planning guides used by local governments for development within the Coastal Zone. They contain goals and policies for development and protection of coastal resources throughout coastal cities and counties in California. LCPs identify appropriate locations for various land uses based on their goal of environmental and sustainable development and growth.
    [Show full text]
  • La Casa Vacia Free Ebook
    FREELA CASA VACIA EBOOK Rosamunde Pilcher | 192 pages | 01 Sep 2005 | DEBOLSILLO | 9788497595704 | English, Spanish | United States LA CASA VACÍA - Arquitectos Valencia Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Get A Copy. Paperbackpages. More Details Original Title. Other Editions 4. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Rating details. La Casa Vacia filters. Sort order. Jun 22, FP rated it liked it. This author makes La Casa Vacia ordinary seem so interesting. Carlos Cerda is a fine writer and he's crafted a very good book here. Both have their merits. The Carlos Cerda is a fine writer and he's crafted a very good book here. The advantage here is that we can concentrate on what happens to non-fringe, everyday lives and relationships after a great crisis. A crisis that was indeed a holocaust. What I gleaned here from Cerda is that people are just as petty and unsatisfied whether or not their country has been a victim of mass state-sponsored murder. This isn't a negative against the author, however. La Casa Vacia crafted realistic characters, characters that have grown up La Casa Vacia post-materialist dreams couched in philosophy studies and philosophers, characters that have bought completely the morality sold to them by the monsters that later perpetrate the atrocity, only to complain about it later when morality is no shield from the horror, no excuse, and no harbinger of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • RECORD PACKET COPY 180 Hday: April24~~ Staff: ALKILB Staff Report: March 5, 01 Hearing Date: April10-13, 2001 Item Tu 12B Commission Action: Approved with Conditions
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA- THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 Filed: October 27, 1999 1 • 49 h Day: December 15, 1999 1 RECORD PACKET COPY 180 hDay: April24~~ Staff: ALKILB Staff Report: March 5, 01 Hearing Date: April10-13, 2001 Item Tu 12b Commission Action: Approved with Conditions STAFF REPORT: REVISED FINDINGS AMENDMENT APPLICATION NUMBER: 5-99-376-A1 (P-81-7789) APPLICANT: John & Chereen langley AGENT: Stan Schrofer, Architect PROJECT LOCATION: 4055 Calle Isabella, San Clemente, (Orange County) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED: Subdivision of 19.2 acres of blufftop property (the former Nixon estate) to 17 single-family residential lots with provision for both vertical and lateral access. Project includes construction of a road, utility lines and demolition of five accessory structures . DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT: Amend permit to allow construction of a one-story, 6719 square foot single-family residence with in-ground pool and spa, wrought iron and concrete • block perimeter wall, hardscape improvements and an attached 1432 square foot six-car garage/storage area at the inlandmost residential lot. The import of 1160 cubic yards of fill will be used to raise the existing grade by one ( 1) foot in order to achieve positive drainage. DATE OF COMMISSION ACTION: January 11, 2000 COMMISSIONERS ON PREVAILING SIDE: Commissioners Daniels, Desser, Estolano, Kruer, Nava, Rose, Woolley and Chairman Wan. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the following revised findings in support of the Commission's action of January 11, 2000 approving the construction of a single family residence with attached garage, pool, spa, hardscape and landscape improvements subject to two (2) special conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Legends of the Surfer Subculture: Part Two
    Topics & Comments [As contributions to this section, the Editors welcome discussions, comments, or collections that are not of conventional article length, topic, or organization.] Legends of the Surfer Subculture: Part Two Tanis Thorne Coinciding with the release of the movie Gidget,' a new era in surfing was ushered in with the development of the light and durable, poly- urethane-foam and fiberglass-covered surfboard. Thousands of Southern California teenagers rushed to enjoy the new-found opportunity at their doorstep and to partake of the radical social identity that went along with surfing. The folklore of the youthful surfers of this period reflects their rebelliousness; with time and maturity, it grew to incorporate the per- vasive themes of political protest, drug-use, and Thoreauian naturalism. For many, surfing was one of the few remaining outlets from overly structured civilization; it was "the most unexplored, unjaded, un- pushbuttoned, pidgeon-holed trip."2 The renowned surfer, Phil Ed- wards, says surfing was first popularized in the United States by rebels -bands of kids on the run-seeking to escape organization and the standardization of man.8 Confirming that the first surfers were bohemians, the editor of Surfer magazine, Steve Pezman, comments that they were deliberately as "out- rageous" as they could be. The rebels would strip off their clothes at parties, wear Nazi uniforms in public for shock value, do "BA's" ("bare-assing") out car windows or next to passenger trains, and other "RF's" ("rat-finking"-i.e., capers, tricks, or practical jokes generally asocial in nature). Two popular stories of "capers" of the day were the "Famous Hood Ornament Trick" and the ubiquitous "Popcorn Box Caper." In the former anecdote, a naked surfer posed gracefully as the hood ornament of a car, while he was ceremoniously chauffeured around a busy, drive- in restaurant.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California
    Protecting Surf Breaks and Surfing Areas in California by Michael L. Blum Date: Approved: Dr. Michael K. Orbach, Adviser Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University May 2015 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................ x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... xiii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. STUDY APPROACH: A TOTAL ECOLOGY OF SURFING ................................................. 5 2.1 The Biophysical Ecology ...................................................................................................... 5 2.2 The Human Ecology ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Trestles Issue
    ISSUE 01 THE TRESTLES THE SPORT OF SURFING OF SPORT THE ISSUE 20 TRESTLES CALIFORNIA ISSUE 01 SEPT.2016 THE 26 TRESTLES ISSUE CONTENTS 04 A NEW BEGINNING An Oral History of Kelly Slater’s First Pro Victory 12 04 11 HOW TRESTLES WORKS By Dr. Falk Feddersen 12 GREAT MOMENTS COVER AND MAP ILLUSTRATIONS BY ALVAR SIRLIN AT TRESTLES Illustrations by Alvar Sirlin EDITOR’S NOTE 16 A TREK THROUGH Roughly 50 miles north of San Diego is an expanse of ocean in his distinctive style. Perhaps the most notable is the rst TRESTLES front, sand and cobblestones named after a railroad bridge. pro victory for an 18-year-old Kelly Slater. We compiled an 16 By photographer Chris Ortiz How did this spot, called “Trestles,” become the most oral history of Slater’s 1990 Trestles win with help from the important place to surf in the continental United States? 11-time world champion. 22 TWENTY REASONS We thought it would be fun to explore that question in this Trestles today stands as a rare example of what the To Be Fired Up About debut of Twenty, a magazine for anyone curious about the California coast looked like in the early part of the 20th the Hurley Pro sport of sur ng. century, when sur ng was a new import from Hawaii and It begins with the 37th President of the United States, not yet a widespread part of American culture. Photographer 24 ONSHORE WORKOUT Richard Nixon, who owned a compound just steps from Chris Ortiz offers a visual guide to this iconic place, and By Kevyn Dean Trestles while he was in the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Society Vehemently Says NO to Toll Road Through San Clemente!
    Subscribe Past Issues Translate Historical Society Vehemently Says NO to Toll Road Through San Clemente! Contact: Raad Ghantous, President FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tel: 949.212.8299 May 17th 2017 Email: [email protected] The San Clemente Historical Society hereby publicly states that it unanimously vehemently opposes any and all proposed, being discussed now or in the future suggested, Toll Roads or Toll Road Extensions that would go through any part of San Clemente! “This (San Clemente) is just a painting five miles long and over a mile wide. Its foreground is the sea. Its background the hills. We will use for our pigments flowers and shrubs and trees and red tile and white plaster. Our streets shall follow the contour of the ground. Our beach shall always be free from hurdey- gurdies and defilement. We believe beauty to be an asset as well as gold and silver …. I do not want people to be repulsed and sent away by ugliness in San Clemente as they have been by ugliness in other communities. This will be a place where man can breathe! The dissatisfied of other communities find rest and hope and peace here.” ~ Ole Hanson, visionary founder of San Clemente, The Spanish Village This land that Ole Hanson picked out of all California to found and build his dream city on in the 1920s had long held attraction. Its beauty had been recounted by members of the first Portola expedition a century and a half before; its desirability was seen by Father Crespi when he stood on that high hill in 1769 and gazed upon the picturesque land stretching gently down to meet the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • A Southern California Surfer's Perspective on Marine Spatial Planning
    Volume 31 Issue 2 Article 1 5-13-2020 A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Planning Edwin C. Kisiel III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Edwin C. Kisiel III, A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Planning, 31 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 225 (2020). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol31/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Kisiel: A Southern California Surfer's Perspective On Marine Spatial Plan 2020] A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SURFER’S PERSPECTIVE ON MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING EDWIN C. KISIEL III* ABSTRACT Increasing intensity in the use of ocean spaces and coastal development presents a threat to recreational uses of the ocean, such as surfing, diving, and snorkeling. Ocean recreational use brings an immense economic benefit to coastal communities. Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning provides a way to protect ocean recreational uses that cannot be replicated elsewhere. There are current legal authorities that permit state and federal agencies to conduct Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning. However, there are im- provements that could be made. This Article makes several recommendations of ways to implement Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning to protect ocean recreational resources from destruction and degradation from competing ocean uses and coastal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Advocacy Strategies for Environmental Protection in the Twenty-First Century
    Assembled V1I4 3.28.2012 (Do Not Delete) 3/28/2012 1:35 PM Lines in the Sand: Contrasting Advocacy Strategies for Environmental Protection in the Twenty-First Century Joel R. Reynolds and Damon K. Nagami* Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1126 I. The Foothill-South Toll Road: Citizen Activism and the Fight to Save San Onofre ................................................................................................................ 1128 A. The Resource: The California State Park at San Onofre State Beach ..... 1129 B. The Threat: The Foothill-South Toll Road ............................................ 1130 C. The Response: Administrative Advocacy, Citizen Action, and Litigation .... 1132 D. The Result: State and Federal Agencies Reject the Toll Road ............ 1142 II. Tejon Ranch: Negotiating for California’s Holy Grail of Conservation ........ 1144 A. The Resource: Tejon Ranch ...................................................................... 1145 B. The Threat: Proposed Development ....................................................... 1146 C. The Approach: Structured Negotiation .................................................. 1147 D. The Result: Tejon Ranch Conservation and Land Use Agreement ... 1153 III.Submarines, Sonar, and the Death of Whales: Citizen Enforcement in Winter v. NRDC ................................................................................................ 1156 A. Background: Whales and Sound..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landmark Agreement Ends 15-Year Dispute Over Sr 241 Toll Road Extension
    EXHIBIT G Joint Statement LANDMARK AGREEMENT ENDS 15-YEAR DISPUTE OVER SR 241 TOLL ROAD EXTENSION Agreement between Orange County toll road agency, Attorney General and a broad coalition of national and local environmental groups will protect San Onofre State Beach, the Richard and Donna O’Neill Conservancy and San Mateo Creek watershed while allowing exploration of other transportation solutions for South Orange County IRVINE, CALIF. – Announcing an end to the 15-year fight over the proposed Foothill-South Toll Road in southern Orange County and northern San Diego County, representatives from the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA), California Attorney General Kamala Harris, the Save San Onofre Coalition, the California Park and Recreation Commission and the Native American Heritage Commission detailed the elements of a historic, comprehensive settlement. The agreement presents an opportunity for TCA to consider a number of transportation project ideas including State Route 241 – Interstate 5 connection options while protecting sensitive lands and cultural resources within the San Mateo Creek watershed, including San Onofre State Beach, the Richard and Donna O’Neill Conservancy, and the Acjachemen/Juaneño village of Panhe. “TCA is very pleased to join over a dozen environmental organizations in this unprecedented outcome, which underscores the collaboration between the Agency’s leadership and leaders of the environmental community,” stated Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency Chairman Craig Young. “For the past two years, TCA and its team of experts have engaged in thoughtful and productive discussions about the future of improving transportation mobility and the importance of protecting environmentally sensitive areas. This agreement is a baseline for achieving both of those objectives,” added Transportation Corridor Agencies Chief Executive Officer Mike Kraman.
    [Show full text]
  • To Read the Full Writ of Mandate from the Reserve
    1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations DANIEL P. BANE, Cal. Bar No. 251144 3 ASHTON M. BRACKEN, Cal. Bar No. 307940 650 Town Center Drive, 4th Floor 4 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1993 Telephone: (714) 513-5100 5 Facsimile: (714) 513-5130 E mail [email protected] 6 [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Petitioner and Plaintiff THE RESERVE MAINTENANCE 8 CORPORATION 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT 11 CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER 12 THE RESERVE MAINTENANCE Case No. 30-2017-00934717-CU-WM-CXC CORPORATION, 13 Petitioner and Plaintiff, 14 VERIFIED PETITION FOR v. PEREMPTORY WRIT OF 15 MANDATE; COMPLAINT FOR FOOTHILL/EASTERN DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE 16 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR RELIEF AGENCY, a Joint Powers Agency; 17 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE [California Environmental Quality Act; FOOTHILL/EASTERN Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. § 1085; Cal. Govt. 18 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR Code §§ 54950 et seq.; Cal. Pub. Res. Code AGENCY; STATE OF CALIFORNIA 21168.5] 19 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and DOES 1 Judge Kim Dunning 20 through 10, Inclusive; Dept CX104 21 Respondents and Defendants. 22 NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY; CALIFORNIA COASTAL PROTECTION 23 NETWORK; CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION; DEFENDERS 24 OF WILDLIFE; ENDANGERED HABITATS LEAGUE; LAGUNA 25 GREENBELT, INC.; NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, 26 INC.; ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER; SEA AND SAGE 27 AUDUBON SOCIETY; SIERRA CLUB; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION; 28 WILDCOAST-COSTASALVAJE; -1- SMRH:483316417.5 VERIFIED PETITION FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 1 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Rivers in Southern California Generally Have Their Most Significant Sections Channelized and Their Embankments Encased in Concrete Or Rock Fill
    TRESTLES WETLANDS NATURAL PRESERVE HABITAT RESTORATION PLAN San Onofre State Park, California DRAFT: April, 2009 SAN MATEO CREEK CONSERVANCY [email protected] Draft April, 2009 San Mateo Creek Conservancy Trestles Wetlands Natural Preserve top: old Coast Highway; far left: Trestles Path; lower right: point at Lower Trestles surf break The Lagoon and Marsh Willow Woodland plant community fronting Lower Trestles ________________________________________________________________________ Trestles Wetlands Natural Preserve Habitat Restoration Plan 2 Draft April, 2009 San Mateo Creek Conservancy CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, GOALS AND ACTION p. 1 SECTION 1 WATERSHED OVERVIEW 1.1 San Mateo Creek p. 5 1.2 Trestles Wetlands Natural Preserve p. 7 SECTION 2 HABITAT RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION 2.1 Removal of Invasive Non-native Species p. 9 2.1.1 Arundo Donax 2.1.2 Cape Ivy p. 11 2.1.3 Canary Island & Washington Palms p. 11 2.1.4 Fennel p. 12 2.1.5 Eucalyptus, et al p. 12 2.2 Steelhead Recovery (note) p. 13 2.3 Removal of Rogue Campsites and Refuse p. 14 SECTION 3 REHABILITATION OF OLD FIELD 3.1 Description p. 15 3.2 Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum) & Removal p. 16 3.3 Planting p. 16 SECTION 4 PATH ENHANCEMENT, VIEWING PLATFORM & INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE 4.1 Fencing p. 19 4.2 Viewing Platform & Interpretive Signage p. 20 REFERENCES CITED OR CONSULTED p. 22 APPENDIX A PLANT COMMUNITIES Plant Community Map of Preserve p. a-1 A.1 Coastal Sage Scrub p. a-2 A.2 Willow Woodland p. a-4 A.3 Sycamore-Cottonwood p. a-6 A.4 Freshwater Marsh p.
    [Show full text]