DOCSLIB.ORG

Read the NPI Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Neighborhood Planning Initiative STRATEGIC PLAN DECEMBER, 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Strategy & Approach 6—INTRODUCTION 8—NPI CORE VALUES 10—STRATEGY & APPROACH 1 12—INTEGRATION WITH BLUEPRINT Grouping & Sequencing 16—INDICATORS OF PLANNING NEED 18—NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING NEED 2 20—PLANNING AREAS MAP & PHASING NPI Process 24—PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS OVERVIEW 26—PLAN CONTENT OVERVIEW 28—SELECTING FOCUS TOPICS 29—PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW 3 32—STEPS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS Planning Areas at a Glance 40—INDEX OF PLANNING AREAS 4 3 6—INTRODUCTION 8—NPI CORE VALUES 10—STRATEGY & APPROACH 12—INTEGRATION WITH BLUEPRINT STRATEGY & APPROACH WHY DOES DENVER NEED NPI? INTRODUCTION Historically, small area plans in Denver have taken many forms including plans for neighborhoods, station areas, this would take approximately 78 years to achieve). WHAT IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING corridors, and other geographies. Small area plans do a Under NPI, area planning will occur according to a INITIATIVE? lot for communities: consistent, streamlined process common to all plans. The Neighborhood Planning Initiative (NPI) is a The multi-year work program will occur according to a ▪ They engage neighborhood stakeholders in new commitment to cover 100% of the city with DIA predictable schedule that is laid out in advance. Once identifying a future vision for the area and then area plans. This will be achieved over a period of 100% coverage of the city is achieved, NPI will continue provide strategies and recommendations for approximately 10-14 years, or faster if resources by cycling back through and updating the completed achieving that vision. allow (under Denver’s current planning approach of plans for each area. conducting one or two neighborhood plans at a time, ▪ They provide detailed recommendations for land use and future investments to help ensure neighborhoods grow as envisioned by the plan. Gateway - Green Valley Ranch Regis Chaffee Park Montbello ▪ They provide a level of analysis, detail, and Elyria Swansea guidance on issues affecting local areas that Stapleton Globeville citywide plans cannot. Berkeley Sunnyside Today, only about 19% of the city has a small area plan Northeast Park Hill adopted after Blueprint Denver (the 2002 citywide land Cole Clayton West Highland Highland use and transportation plan). Another 39% of the city has small area plans older than Blueprint Denver, indicating Five Points Whittier Skyland North Park Hill they are getting out-of-date and need to be refreshed. Jefferson Union Sloan Lake Park Station Finally, a significant percentage of the city (42%) has no City Park small area plan at all. New plans produced under NPI Auraria City Park South Park Hill CBD North West Capitol Hill would be the first area plans of any kind for many parts of East Colfax West Colfax Civic No adopted area or the city. Center Cheesman Plans adopted after Lincoln Park Park Hale neighborhood plan Capitol Hill Congress Park Montclair Blueprint (2002) The NPI area planning process offers neighborhood Villa Park Sun Valley stakeholders the opportunity to come together and f City shape the future of an area. By obtaining 100% coverage Country o (e Club t x Cherry Creek Hilltop c of the city with area plans, NPI will place all areas of the Barnum Barnum Valverde Speer Lowry Field n lu West Baker e d city on an equal footing on issues related to growth and c in r g development. Elected officials, Planning Board members, Wash e D Park 19.2% I and other decision-makers will have comparable Belcaro P A Westwood Athmar Park West Washington Windsor Washington Virginia Vale ) information and policy guidance to help with decision- Park 42% making regardless of location. Cory - Merrill Mar Lee Ruby Hill Platt Park Virginia Village Overland BACKGROUND ON DENVER’S 78 Indian 38.8% n NEIGHBORHOODS College View - Creek South Platte a University Park l Harvey Park The basis for the City’s neighborhood delineation Rosedale University Goldsmith w p it d was established in 1972 as part of a federally-funded h adopte community renewal program, driven by the need to keep Hampden consistent boundaries for the purposes of data tracking Bear Valley Harvey Park South Wellshire University Hills Kennedy and historical comparison. The resulting areas are called Plans adopted prior Neighborhood Statistical Areas (NSAs), and their purpose Southmoor to Blueprint (2002) Park is to maintain consistent and permanent boundaries Hampden South over time. The boundaries align with U.S. census tracts, Fort Logan allowing for historical comparison of data. The only years (current changes made to the map since this original effort have 78 planning been to reflect annexation of new land into Denver, such Marston approach) as DIA. NSAs are distinct from Registered Neighborhood years (NPI 10-14planning approach) Organizations (RNOs), which are organizations with Map produced 10/3/16 boundaries that are self-defined and may overlap. 6 7 NPI CORE VALUES VALUES FOR THE NPI PLANNING PROGRAM The NPI planning process has three core values: intentional, equitable, and measurable. These values are the foundation of NPI and guided the development of the strategic plan. These core values will remain constant and continue into the future as area plans are developed over the coming years. INTENTIONAL EQUITABLE MEASURABLE VALUE 1 VALUE 2 VALUE 3 The planning process will be clear and participants will The planning process will treat neighborhoods fairly The planning process will make use of data to inform know what to expect. and promote balanced, equitable outcomes. decisions and track implementation progress. ▪ Focused. The planning process will target issues ▪ 100% Coverage. By obtaining 100% coverage ▪ Data-Informed. Indicators of planning need will most relevant for the community, and that can of the city with area plans, NPI will provide the be used to inform the order in which plans will be be effectively addressed through neighborhood same policy foundation for the entire city. undertaken. Decisions will be supported by data planning. and analysis throughout each planning process. ▪ Inclusive. The process will include diverse Information will be transparent and available. ▪ Streamlined. NPI will follow the same multi- perspectives and provide multiple ways to be phased model for each planning process as involved. ▪ Implementation Metrics. Wherever possible, defined by the NPI Strategic Plan. plan recommendations will be tied to metrics to ▪ Transparent. Information will be transparent help track progress toward implementation. ▪ Innovative. NPI will develop customized, and available. Draft materials will be created unique, and creative recommendations for each throughout the process. Stakeholders will planning area. have an opportunity to inform content as it is developed. Area plan phasing will provide the ▪ Informed. NPI will use relevant data and analysis community with advance notice of upcoming for informed decision making. planning efforts. ▪ Multi-Departmental. City agencies will coordinate with each other and the public in developing each plan. 8 9 STRATEGY & APPROACH NPI will result in 100% coverage of the city by small area plans within a timeframe of approximately 10-14 years. This will be accomplished by adhering to a planning approach consisting of nine components, organized here INTENTIONAL EQUITABLE MEASURABLE by their relationship to NPI’s three core values. 1. GROUP NEIGHBORHOODS TOGETHER 4. HAVE MULTIPLE PLANS IN PROCESS AT 7. PRIORITIZE PLAN SEQUENCING USING THE SAME TIME NEED-BASED FACTORS In the past, small area plans were conducted at a variety of scales, the most common of which was the With known resources as of the time of this Strategic NPI will systematically prepare plans for each of the 19 individual neighborhood-level. Under this system, Plan (2016), it is envisioned that there will be three planning areas. The sequencing of these plans will be each neighborhood plan took an average of two NPI plans in process at any given time. Sustaining this as objective as possible and informed by a number of years to complete. NPI will group neighborhoods level of planning over the course of many years will factors including planning need, previous planning, together to cover larger areas. Each of Denver’s 78 require identifying a consistent funding stream for the plan impact, funding, efficiency, and geographic statistical neighborhoods will be assigned to one of initiative. equity (see page 19 for more detail on each of these 19 groupings, and each grouping will receive its own factors). NPI area plans will occur in phases, with area plan. For more details on the proposed groupings, phase 1 plans occurring in the first 18-24 months of refer to the Grouping and Sequencing section 5. COMMIT TO AN ONGOING PROCESS the initiative, phase 2 plans occurring in the next 18- beginning on page 14 of this strategic plan. NPI represents a significant commitment to area 24 month period after that, and so on. As one phase planning and implementation over a long period of of the initiative is completed, the remaining areas of the city will be re-evaluated relative to the factors and 2. OBSERVE A MAXIMUM TIMELINE time. When one area plan is completed, the next will start. NPI’s initial goal will be to obtain 100% coverage the next phase announced. NPI area plans will be designed to be completed of the city with area plans, but NPI will not be over and adopted in 18 months and will take no longer when this is achieved. By the time the last plan is 8. FOCUSED IMPLEMENTATION than 2 years. Observing this timeline for each plan is completed, significant time will have passed and important in order to keep the larger 19-plan initiative the first few NPI area plans will need to be refreshed. Wherever possible, NPI plans will identify metrics on schedule. Some plans will use the entire two-year At that point, NPI will shift its focus to cycling back to track progress towards the implementation of timeframe, whereas others may be completed faster.
Recommended publications
  • Designated Urban Centers

    Designated Urban Centers

    Designated Urban Centers Within 1/4 Mile of Served by Transit Served by Transit Urban Center Name Community Rapid Transit with 15 Min. with 30 Min. System Station Headways or Less Headways or Less Candelas ArvadaNoNoNo Olde Town/New Town Arvada Yes No Yes Ralston Fields Arvada Yes No Yes 1st Avenue Center Aurora No Yes Yes 56th Avenue Aurora No No No Airport Gateway Aurora Yes No Yes Aurora City Center Aurora Yes Yes Yes Buckingham Center Aurora No Yes Yes Colfax Avenue Aurora No Yes Yes E‐470 / I‐70 Aurora No No No Fitzsimons Aurora Yes Yes Yes Hampden Town Center Aurora Yes No No I‐225/Parker Road Aurora Yes Yes Yes Iliff Avenue Center Aurora No Yes Yes Jewell Avenue Aurora No No No Smoky Hill Aurora No No No 28th/30th Streets (BVRC) Boulder Yes Yes Yes Downtown Boulder Boulder No Yes Yes Gunbarrel Activity Center Boulder No No Yes University Hill Boulder No Yes Yes Adams Crossing Activity Center Brighton No No No Bromley Park Activity Center Brighton No No Yes Downtown Brighton Activity Ctr Brighton No No Yes Prairie Center Activity Center Brighton No No No 1‐25 & SH 7 Activity Center Broomfield No No Yes Interlocken Loopp Activityy Center Broomfield Yes Yes Yes Original Broomfield TODBroomfieldNoNoNo Urban Transit Village Broomfield Yes Yes Yes 10th & Osage Station Denver Yes No Yes 29th Ave. Town Center Denver No Yes Yes 38th and Blake TOD Denver Yes No Yes 41st and Fox TOD Denver Yes No Yes 62nd and Pena TODDenverNoNoNo Alameda Station Denver Yes Yes Yes Bear Valley Denver No Yes Yes Bellview Station Denver Yes No Yes Broadway Station
  • FEMA Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans

    FEMA Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans

    Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101 Version 2.0 November 2010 I am pleased to announce the release of Version 2.0 of Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 101: Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101 provides guidance for developing emergency operations plans. It promotes a common understanding of the fundamentals of risk-informed planning and decision making to help planners examine a hazard or threat and produce integrated, coordinated, and synchronized plans. The goal of CPG 101 is to assist in making the planning process routine across all phases of emergency management and for all homeland security mission areas. This Guide helps planners at all levels of government in their efforts to develop and maintain viable, all-hazards, all-threats emergency plans. Based on input from state, territorial, tribal, and local officials from across the United States, this update of CPG 101 expands on the fundamentals contained in the first version. With this edition, greater emphasis is placed on representing and engaging the whole community—to include those with access and functional needs, children, and those with household pets and service animals. Residents and all sectors of the community have a critical role and shared responsibility to take appropriate actions to protect themselves, their families and organizations, and their properties. Planning that engages and includes the whole community serves as the focal point for building a collaborative and resilient community. CPG 101 is the foundation for state, territorial, tribal, and local emergency planning in the United States. Planners in other disciplines, organizations, and the private sector, as well as other levels of government, may find this Guide useful in the development of their emergency operations plans.
  • Designing Cities, Planning for People

    Designing Cities, Planning for People

    Designing cities, planning for people The guide books of Otto-Iivari Meurman and Edmund Bacon Minna Chudoba Tampere University of Technology School of Architecture [email protected] Abstract Urban theorists and critics write with an individual knowledge of the good urban life. Recently, writing about such life has boldly called for smart cities or even happy cities, stressing the importance of social connections and nearness to nature, or social and environmental capital. Although modernist planning has often been blamed for many current urban problems, the social and the environmental dimensions were not completely absent from earlier 20th century approaches to urban planning. Links can be found between the urban utopia of today and the mid-20th century ideas about good urban life. Changes in the ideas of what constitutes good urban life are investigated in this paper through two texts by two different 20th century planners: Otto-Iivari Meurman and Edmund Bacon. Both were taught by the Finnish planner Eliel Saarinen, and according to their teacher’s example, also wrote about their planning ideas. Meurman’s guide book for planners was published in 1947, and was a major influence on Finnish post-war planning. In Meurman’s case, the book answered a pedagogical need, as planners were trained to meet the demands of the structural changes of society and the needs of rapidly growing Finnish cities. Bacon, in a different context, stressed the importance of an urban design attitude even when planning the movement systems of a modern metropolis. Bacon’s book from 1967 was meant for both designers and city dwellers, exploring the dynamic nature of modern urbanity.
  • 2020 Edmund N. Bacon Urban Design Awards

    2020 Edmund N. Bacon Urban Design Awards

    2020 Edmund N. Bacon Urban Design Awards Student Design Competition Brief $25 | per entry at the time of submission $5,000 | First Prize Award Sign up now for more information www.PhiladelphiaCFA.org IMPORTANT DATES August 1, 2019: Full Competition Packet released + Competition opens November 22, 2019: Final date to submit entries February 2020 (date TBD): Awards Ceremony in Philadelphia EDMUND N. BACON URBAN DESIGN AWARDS Founded in 2006 in memory of Philadelphia’s iconic 20th century city planner, Edmund N. Bacon [1910-2005], this annual program honors both professionals and students whose work epitomize excellence in urban design. Each year, a professional who has made significant contributions to the field of urban planning is selected to receive our Edmund N. Bacon Award. In addition, the winners of an international student urban design competition, envisioning a better Philadelphia, are honored with our Edmund N. Bacon Student Awards. The combined awards ceremony is hosted in Philadelphia each February. 2020 STUDENT AWARDS COMPETITION TOPIC THE BIG PICTURE: REVEALING GERMANTOWN’S ASSETS Chelten Avenue is the heart of the Germantown business district in northwest Philadelphia. The most economically diverse neighborhood in the city, Germantown is an African American community which bridges the economically disadvantaged neighborhoods of North Philadelphia to the east with the wealthier Mount Airy and Chestnut Hill neighborhoods to the west. The Chelten Avenue shopping district benefits from two regional rail stations (along different train lines) and one of the busiest bus stops in the city, located midway between the stations. In addition, the southern end of the shopping district is just steps from the expansive Wissahickon Valley Park, one of the most wild places in Philadelphia, visited by over 1 million people each year.
  • The Challenge of Recreation Planning: Methodology and Factors to Consider

    The Challenge of Recreation Planning: Methodology and Factors to Consider

    THE CHALLENGE OF RECREATION PLANNING: METHODOLOGY AND FACTORS TO CONSIDER by RONALD B. ULECK, Research Associate, Department of For- estry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill. This paper is adapted from a Ph.D. dissertation, "Guidelines for preparing development plans for public resource-based outdoor recreation areas." submitted to New York State University College of Forestry at Syracuse Uni- versity, Syracuse, N. Y. ABSTRACT. The proposed methodology of planning is a descrip- tion, explanation, and justification of the methods or techniques that a planner should use in preparing outdoor recreation development plans. The sequence of steps required is described. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE In this paper, public outdoor recreation development planning is defined as a ra- UTDOOR RECREATION planning tional and systematic process, integrated 0 is a broad and complex activity. This with all the important social and physical paper deals with one aspect of that factors, for determining appropriate action activity: development planning - that is, in developing the natural resource to pro- planning of the natural resource base to vide outdoor recreational opportunities.* change its potential capacity for providing recreational opportunities. The primary The guidelines were developed from orientation is toward providing guidelines several sources. General planning theory, for planning an individual outdoor recrea- methodology, methods, and techniques for tion area or complex such as a state, county, various kinds of planning (e.g., urban, en- or regional
  • I-25 Central Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study

    I-25 Central Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study

    Existing Conditions Assessment I-25 Central Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study 2829 W. Howard Pl. Denver, CO 80204 [email protected] i25centralpel.codot.us This page intentionally left blank. Existing Conditions Assessment Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Location and Description ........................................................................................................ 1 Public and Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................... 3 Feedback Received To-Date ...................................................................................................... 5 Transportation Planning Context ....................................................................................................... 7 The History of I-25 Central ............................................................................................................... 7 Existing Land Use Context ............................................................................................................... 7 Section 1: 20th Street to Colfax Avenue ..................................................................................... 8 Section 2: Colfax Avenue to US 6/6th Avenue ............................................................................ 8 Section 3: US 6/6th Avenue to Santa Fe Drive/US 85 .............................................................
  • Planning Commission Handbook

    Planning Commission Handbook

    Routt County Planning Department Box 773749 Steamboat Springs, CO 80477 970-879-2704 Routt County Planning Commission Handbook March, 2015 PI2014-007 Introduction Welcome to the Planning Commission The Planning Commission is one of the most This handbook will help you understand the legal visible groups responsible for planning in and policy framework for planning. It will also unincorporated Routt County including the provide you with a reference for the powers and communities of Milner, Phippsburg, Toponas and duties of the planning commission. As a planning Hahns Peak. commissioner you must have some understanding of the following topics: The Planning Commission is an appointed board of residents with commissioners selected from 1. Comprehensive planning. four different districts and four municipalities in 2. Zoning and platting. Routt County (North Routt – District 1, Land 3. How the planning commission operates and around Steamboat Springs – District 2, West the role and responsibilities of each individual Routt - District 3, and South Routt – District 4, the member. Towns of Yampa, Hayden, Oak Creek, and the City 4. The authority and duties of the commission. of Steamboat Springs) established as an advisory 5. Legal aspects of commission conduct. group for the Board of County Commissioners on 6. Standards for commission decision-making. planning matters and to perform other duties authorized by state statute. Even though you may This Planning Commission Handbook covers all of have been appointed from a certain area, your these topics and you will be given copies of the job is to represent the whole community. The Routt County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations Planning Commission’s principle responsibility is and the Routt County Master Plan.
  • Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc

    Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc

    STATE OF DOWNTOWN DENVER SEPTEMBER 2012 Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc. With support from: STATE OF 1 DOWNTOWN DENVER INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Letter .................................................1 Dear Downtown Denver Stakeholder, Key Facts ...............................................................2 Thank you for picking up a copy of the Downtown Denver Partnership’s annual State of Downtown Denver report, a fact-driven report that provides timely, Denver’s Downtown Area Plan ..............................3 objective and accurate data about Downtown Denver. This year we are proud Notable Rankings ..................................................4 to collaborate with Newmark Knight Frank Frederick Ross to bring you the most complete statistics and analysis about Downtown Denver. Office Market .................................................... 6-7 Employers & Employees ..................................... 8-9 In his 2012 State of the City address, Mayor Michael B. Hancock remarked that a vibrant downtown core is essential to the health of the city. At the 2012 Retail & Restaurants .............................................11 Rocky Mountain Urban Leadership Symposium, Governor Hickenlooper and Downtown Residents ..................................... 12-13 other leaders in the Rocky Mountain West stressed the importance of urban centers in creating strong place-based economies that attract and retain top Transportation ............................................... 14-15 talent. Downtown Denver is one
  • Strategic Planning and Management Guidelines for Transportation Agencies

    Strategic Planning and Management Guidelines for Transportation Agencies

    331 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 33I STRATEGIC PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1990 OFFICERS Chairman: Wayne Muri, Chief Engineer, Missouri Highway & Transportation Department Vice Chairman: C. Michael Walton, Bess Harris Jones Centennial Professor and Chairman, College of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Executive Director: Thomas B. Deen, Transportation Research Board MEMBERS JAMES B. BUSEY IV, Federal Aviation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GILBERT E. CARMICHAEL, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation. (ex officio) BRIAN W. CLYMER, Urban Mass Transportation Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) JERRY R. CURRY, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ex officio) JOHN GRAY, President, Notional Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) THOMAS H. HANNA, President and Chief Executive Officer, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. (ex officio) HENRY J. HATCH, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ex officio) THOMAS D. LARSON, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GEORGE H. WAY, JR., Vice President for Research and Test Departments, Association
  • Broncosride Pickup Schedule for December 22, 2019

    Broncosride Pickup Schedule for December 22, 2019

    BroncosRide and Light Rail Service page 1 of 2 BroncosRide Schedule for: Sunday, December 22, 2019 Route: Park-n-Ride / Stop / Station Times are approximate Post game bus location** BR26: Dry Creek & University 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 12:55 PM Row 22 Arapahoe High School BR24: Alameda Havana 12:25 PM 12:40 PM 12:55 PM Row 21 BR10: Boulder High School 11:35 AM 11:55 AM 12:15 PM Row15-16 Arapahoe & 17th BR32: El Rancho 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:35 PM Row 4 BR32: Evergreen 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:20 PM Row 4 BR38: Federal Shuttle: Lincoln HS (Hazel Ct & Iliff) and bus stops on Federal Blvd 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5 - 10 minutes until 1:50 PM Row 28 between Evans and 8th Ave BR20: Longmont Park-n-Ride 11:30 AM 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:30 PM Rows 17-18 815 South Main Street BR44: Nine Mile (Ga te F) 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:00 PM Rows 23-24 BR8: Olde Town Arvada Discontinued Discontinued: Ride G-Line to DUS and Transfer to C, E or W-Lines to Broncos Stadium BR48: Parker 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM Row 19 BR48: Pinery 11:35 AM 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:05 PM 12:20 PM Row 19 BR56: South High School 11:40 AM 11:50 AM 12:00 PM 12:10 PM 12:20 PM 12:35 PM 12:50 PM Row 26 Louisiana & Gilpin BR4: Thornton (Gate C) 11:40 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM every 5-10 minutes until 1:35 PM Rows 9-12 BR10: US 36 & Broomfield Station (Gate 11:35 AM 11:45 AM 11:55 AM 12:05 PM 12:15 PM 12:25 PM 12:45 PM Rows 15-16 K) BR10: US 36 & McCaslin Stn (Gate A) 11:45
  • Strategic Planning Basics for Managers

    Strategic Planning Basics for Managers

    STRATEGIC PLANNING Guide for Managers 1 Strategic Planning Basics for Managers In all UN offices, departments and missions, it is critical that managers utilize the most effective approach toward developing a strategy for their existing programmes and when creating new programmes. Managers use the strategy to communicate the direction to staff members and guide the larger department or office work. Here you will find practical techniques based on global management best practices. Strategic planning defined Strategic planning is a process of looking into the future and identifying trends and issues against which to align organizational priorities of the Department or Office. Within the Departments and Offices, it means aligning a division, section, unit or team to a higher-level strategy. In the UN, strategy is often about achieving a goal in the most effective and efficient manner possible. For a few UN offices (and many organizations outside the UN), strategy is about achieving a mission comparatively better than another organization (i.e. competition). For everyone, strategic planning is about understanding the challenges, trends and issues; understanding who are the key beneficiaries or clients and what they need; and determining the most effective and efficient way possible to achieve the mandate. A good strategy drives focus, accountability, and results. How and where to apply strategic planning UN departments, offices, missions and programmes develop strategic plans to guide the delivery of an overall mandate and direct multiple streams of work. Sub-entities create compatible strategies depending on their size and operational focus. Smaller teams within a department/office or mission may not need to create strategies; there are, however, situations in which small and medium teams may need to think strategically, in which case the following best practices can help structure the thinking.
  • 2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview

    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and Fastracks Overview

    2013 Transit-Oriented Development Status Report RTD and FasTracks Overview RTD oversees a 47-mile rail transit system that services 46 stations on five corridors including: • The 5.3-mile Central Corridor and 1.8-mile Central Platte Valley (CPV) Spur in central Denver • The 8.7-mile Southwest Line to Englewood, Sheridan, and Littleton • The 19.2-mile Southeast Line to Lone Tree and Aurora • The 12.1-mile West Line to Lakewood and Golden The FasTracks program, approved by district voters in a 2004 ballot initiative will: • add 122 miles of rail service • 18 miles of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • approximately 60 new stations along six new corridors • extend three existing light rail lines image courtesy Gensler Grand Opening / image courtesy RTD Construction cranes dominated the skyline in RTD and TOD STAMPs Underway STAMPs Kicking Off 2013, as the result of an apartment boom in in 2014 the metro area. Development in 2013 centered Transit-oriented development is typically on the hub of the FasTracks program: Denver higher density and incorporates a mixture C-470/Lucent Station I-25/Broadway Station Area Master Plan Area Master Plan Union Station which is scheduled to open in of different uses that generate transit rider- spring 2014. Significant development has also ship. Multiple TODs contribute to creating 104th Ave. Station TOD Fitzsimons Parkway occurred around other existing and future transit-oriented communities where people Master Planning Study Station Area Master Plan stations as construction of FasTracks corridors can live, work, reduce transportation costs, continues at a rapid pace. and improve overall health through increased 88th Avenue Station Civic Center Station muli-modal activity.