High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Paleogene, Nontropical Mixed Carbonate/Siliciclastic Shelf Sediments, North Carolina Coastal Plain, U
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Paleogene, Nontropical Mixed Carbonate/Siliciclastic Shelf Sediments, North Carolina Coastal Plain, U. S. A. by Brian Perry Coffey Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences J. Fred Read (Chair) K. A. Eriksson R. K. Bambach T. J. Burbey D. A. Textoris M. G. Imhof January 14, 2000 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Paleogene, sequence stratigraphy, nontropical, mixed carbonate-siliciclastic, North Carolina High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of Paleogene, Nontropical Mixed Carbonate/Siliciclastic Shelf Sediments, North Carolina Coastal Plain, U. S. A. by Brian Perry Coffey J. F. Read, Chairman Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Tech (ABSTRACT) The sequence stratigraphic development of the subsurface Paleogene, Albemarle Basin, North Carolina, was defined using well cuttings and wireline logs tied into largely published biostratigraphic and available seismic data. Facies include: silty and shelly sands and shell beds (estuarine/lagoon/protected inner shelf facies); clean quartz sands and sandy mollusk-fragment grainstones (shoreface/shallow shelf); phosphatic hardgrounds (current and wave-swept shoreface and shallow shelf); bryozoan and echinoderm grainstones/packstones (storm reworked middle shelf); and fine skeletal wackestones and planktonic marls (slightly storm-winnowed to sub-wave base, deeper shelf). Paleogene deposition on this high-energy, open-shelf was characterized by a distinctive shelf profile of inner shelf and inner shelf break, deep shelf and continental shelf/slope break. The successive positions of terminal supersequence inner-shelf-breaks ii parallel the modern day continental margin and its onshore arches. Thickness trends were strongly controlled by more rapid subsidence within the Albemarle Basin. The Paleocene supersequence is dominated by deep shelf marl and developed following flooding after the latest Cretaceous low-stand. Major shallowing occurred at the end of the Early Paleocene and near the end of the Late Paleocene. The Eocene supersequence developed following lowstand deposition (evident on seismic) just off the terminal Paleocene depositional shelf break. With flooding, a major transgressive sediment body developed (Pamlico spur), that formed a 50 km wide by 50 m high promontory at the inner shelf break, followed by HST progradation of quartzose and bryozoan-echinoderm open shelf carbonates that filled in the laterally adjacent shelf topography. This was followed by ancestral Gulf Stream incision of the southeast- trending, shallow shelf to the south, and deep shelf further northeast. Late Eocene- Oligocene deposition was initiated with localized lowstand sedimentation off the earlier terminal inner shelf break, followed by thin regional marl deposition and widespread highstand inner shelf, quartz sands and quartzose carbonates. Localized Late Oligocene lowstand deposition occurred along the earlier Oligocene terminal inner shelf break, followed by widespread deposition of quartzose facies over the shallow shelf. Oligocene units on the deep shelf were modified by highstand Gulf Stream scour. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the help of friends, colleagues, and family. I thank Fred Read for exposing me to the carbonate realm, both in the field and classroom, and for treating me as a friend and peer, with valuable suggestions and hours of engaging conversation. Members of the graduate committee, Richard Bambach, Thomas Burbey, Kenneth Eriksson, Matthias Imhof, and Daniel Textoris, are also thanked for their valuable input and instruction. Discussion with new and old friends who have called the Carbonate Lab home, particularly Aus Al-Tawil, Taury Smith, Amy Khetani, and Thomas Wynn, have helped improve my understanding of geology and made my time at Virginia Tech enjoyable. Also, I am fortunate to have met so many new friends while in the department, who have stimulated many scientific and social discussions. The office staff has been invaluable to everyday life, and is thanked for their kind assistance. Students helping to prepare the thousands of thin-sections needed for this study, Chris Chitty, Chad Haiar, Karen Michelson, and Miles Gentry provided great assistance and companionship during long hours in the Carbonate Lab. Richard Laws and Tim Bralower provided nannofossil age picks from critical stratigraphic intervals. This work has benefited greatly from grants from the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, the Department of Geological Sciences at Virginia Tech, the Geological Society of America, the North Carolina Geological Survey, and the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts. Special thanks for the ever-helpful personnel at the North Carolina Geologic Survey for providing access to data and materials. Quarry operators, Orrin Pilkey, and the personnel at the U.S. Geological Survey are thanked for allowing access to outcrops, dredge samples, cores, and seismic data. I thank my parents iv for unending encouragement and support and, most importantly, Ginger for companionship, support, and patience during the long 2½ years we were separated while I completed this degree. I thank you all for your help and value each of you as friends. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE..................................................................................................................................i ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................vi FIGURES..........................................................................................................................xi TABLES...........................................................................................................................xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2: CARBONATE SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY FROM WELL- CUTTINGS...................................................................................................................3 ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................3 GEOLOGIC SETTING..............................................................................................4 Regional Stratigraphy....................................................................................8 METHODS..............................................................................................................10 AGE CONTROL.....................................................................................................11 LITHOFACIES FROM CUTTINGS......................................................................12 Muddy Quartz Sands/Silts...........................................................................12 Quartz Sands/Skeletal Fragment Quartz Sands...........................................16 Sandy, Whole Mollusk Packstone/Grainstone............................................17 Sandy, Mollusk-Fragment Grainstone/Packstone.......................................20 Phosphatic Sands And Hardgrounds...........................................................21 Bryozoan/Echinoderm Grainstones/Packstones..........................................22 Glauconitic Sands........................................................................................26 Fine Wackestones/Mudstones.....................................................................27 Argillaceous, Variably Sandy Carbonate Mudstone (Marl)........................28 DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES FROM THE CUTTINGS DATA......................28 Sequence Boundaries..................................................................................29 Lowstand Systems Tracts...........................................................................29 Transgressive Systems Tracts.....................................................................29 vi Maximum Flooding Surfaces.......................................................................32 Highstand Systems Tracts............................................................................32 Sequence Stratigraphic Position of Hardgrounds........................................32 SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY AND LONG-TERM TRENDS FROM WELL CUTTINGS..................................................................................................33 LIMITATIONS ON THE CUTTINGS DATA.....................................................37 Downhole Mixing........................................................................................37 Sample Spacing...........................................................................................39 Sample Resolution.......................................................................................39 Time Requirements......................................................................................39 Interbedding Versus Mixing........................................................................40 CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................................................42