Columbia River User Data Report I Draft Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Columbia River User Data Report I Draft Report C OLUMBIA R IVER U SER D ATA R EPORT Draft Report April 2012 Title VI The Columbia River Crossing project team ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefits and services resulting from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regarding WSDOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. For questions regarding ODOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at (503) 986-4350. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information If you would like copies of this document in an alternative format, please call the Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project office at (360) 737-2726 or (503) 256-2726. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the CRC project through the Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing 7-1-1. ¿Habla usted español? La informacion en esta publicación se puede traducir para usted. Para solicitar los servicios de traducción favor de llamar al (503) 731-4128. Columbia River User Data Report i Draft Report TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. EXISTING USER AND VESSEL DATA ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 User Data ................................................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.1 Commercial Tugs and Tows ................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.2 Recreational Sailboats and Powerboats ............................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.3 Marine Contractors ............................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.4.4 Federal Government ............................................................................................................................ 1-9 1.4.5 Marine Industries ................................................................................................................................ 1-10 1.4.6 Passenger Cruise ............................................................................................................................... 1-12 1.5 River Ports .............................................................................................................................................. 1-13 1.5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-13 1.5.2 Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1-13 2. FUTURE GROWTH ................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Environmental/Land Use Issues Related to Columbia River Scenic Gorge .............................................. 2-1 2.2 Port of Portland Plans ............................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Other River Ports ...................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.2 Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 USACE Plans for Locks and Maintenance Needs .................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 USACE Dredging Maintenance Plans ...................................................................................................... 2-4 2.6 Nuclear Shipments ................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.7 Plans for Existing Businesses and Potential New Users .......................................................................... 2-6 2.7.1 Commercial Tugs and Tows ................................................................................................................. 2-6 2.7.2 Recreational Sailboats and Powerboats ............................................................................................... 2-6 2.7.3 Marine Contractors ............................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.7.4 Federal Government ............................................................................................................................ 2-7 2.7.5 Marine Industries .................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.7.6 Passenger Cruise ................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.7.7 Other .................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 3. RIVER CLEARANCES ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 References ............................................................................................................................................... 3-5 4. RIVER LEVELS ..................................................................................................................................... 4-1 ii Columbia River User Data Report Draft Report List of Figures FIGURE 1-1. VERTICAL REFERENCE DIAGRAM ............................................................................................... 1-4 List of Tables TABLE 1-1: INITIALLY IDENTIFIED USERS ....................................................................................................... 1-2 TABLE 1-2: ADDITIONAL USERS .................................................................................................................... 1-3 TABLE 3-1: COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER NAVIGATION CLEARANCES ........................................................... 3-3 Appendices APPENDIX A – SUMMARY TABLES OF USER DATA APPENDIX B – REQUEST FOR RIVER USER DATA APPENDIX C – PUBLIC NOTICE AND LIST OF PUBLICATIONS APPENDIX D – RIVER USER DATA SHEET APPENDIX E – COMPLETED USER DATA SHEETS APPENDIX F – ADDITIONAL USER INFORMATION APPENDIX G – PORT INTERVIEWS APPENDIX H – RIVER LEVELS Columbia River User Data Report iii Draft Report ACRONYMS ADA Americans with Disabilities Act BN Burlington Northern CBC Columbia Business Center CRC Columbia River Crossing CRD Columbia River Datum DOE U.S. Department of Energy GMA General Management Area I-5 Interstate-5 LOA Length overall MLLW Mean Lower Low Water MSL Mean Sea Level NOAA National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration PTIP Public Transportation Improvement Plan SMA Special Management Area USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USCG U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Navy PSNS U.S. Navy Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility WIPP Waste Isolation Pilot Plant iv Columbia River User Data Report Draft Report This page left blank intentionally. Columbia River User Data Report v Draft Report DESCRIPTIONS Air Draft Height of the highest fixed point of the vessel above the water line Air Gap Clearance from the highest fixed point of the vessel to lowest part of bridge Beam Width of the vessel Draft Depth of vessel’s hull below the waterline Freeboard Height of vessel’s deck above the waterline Length Overall length of the vessel vi Columbia River User Data Report Draft Report This page left blank intentionally. Columbia River User Data Report 1 Draft Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to document the findings of a Columbia River user survey of vessels, equipment, and fabrications that currently transit, and may in the future transit, underneath the Interstate-5 Bridge both along the main channel and Oregon Slough. This data report does
Recommended publications
  • The 46Th Annual
    the 46th Annual 2018 TO BENEFIT NANTUCKET COMMUNITY SAILING PROUD TO SPONSOR MURRAY’S TOGGERY SHOP 62 MAIN STREET | 800-368-3134 2 STRAIGHT WHARF | 508-325-9600 1-800-892-4982 2018 elcome to the 15th Nantucket Race Week and the 46th Opera House Cup Regatta brought to you by Nantucket WCommunity Sailing, the Nantucket Yacht Club and the Great Harbor Yacht Club. We are happy to have you with us for an unparalleled week of competitive sailing for all ages and abilities, complemented by a full schedule of awards ceremonies and social events. We look forward to sharing the beauty of Nantucket and her waters with you. Thank you for coming! This program celebrates the winners and participants from last year’s Nantucket Race Week and the Opera House Cup Regatta and gives you everything you need to know about this year’s racing and social events. We are excited to welcome all sailors in the Nantucket community to join us for our inaugural Harbor Rendezvous on Sunday, August 12th. We are also pleased to welcome all our competitors, including young Opti and 420 racers; lasers, Hobies and kite boarders; the local one design fleets; the IOD Celebrity Invitational guest tacticians and amateur teams; and the big boat regatta competitors ranging from Alerions and Wianno Seniors to schooners and majestic classic yachts. Don’t forget that you can go aboard and admire some of these beautiful classics up close, when they will be on display to the public for the 5th Classic Yacht Exhibition on Saturday, August 18th.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on Waldo Lake Columbia Seaplane Pilots Association
    Columbia Seaplane Pilots Association 13200 Fielding Road President ARON FAEGRE 503-222-2546 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 Vice President BILL WAINWRIGHT 503-293-7627 Treasurer JAMIE GREENE 503-292-1495 Secretary JOHN CHLOPEK 503-810-7690 March 2009 Volume 30, Issue 1 CSPA An Update on Waldo Lake e-BULL-A-TON By Aron Faegre Inside this issue: As of a month ago both Stewart and federal government owns the lake. CSPA have each filed requests for sum- Cloran filed a brief with all the reasons President’s Message mary judgments with the court asking why the case should go on and not An Update on Waldo Lake 1-2 the judge to make his ruling. This is be- stop, and attached the Carrier affida- By Aron Faegre cause we feel the record strongly sup- vit. The judge said let’s have a confer- ports a finding that Waldo Lake is navi- Jamie Greene, making us proud. 3 ence call with all parties and talk gable, which means the Forest Service about it on Tuesday (before the The TSA Proposed LASP, and (FS) is not the agency allowed to regu- planned Friday meeting). At the con- “Playbook” Operations: An Opinion 3-5 from the Alaskan Experimental Air- late seaplane use of the lake. If the lake ference call there was extensive dis- craft Association. is navigable, it is owned by the State of cussion, following which the judge Watercraft Border Crossing Oregon, and it is the State that is al- said “no.” He said he wanted to have 6 By “Chuck I-Am-a-Boat” Jarecki lowed to regulate seaplane use.
    [Show full text]
  • March 16,1865
    *Wima&mvciA~ Jit (ll I / < I ,s *'*iMt**Sf *««* ihnll ,-gaiatf^ a^bxjt ,DM.U —*“r ■*♦•- >’-*wA *i: aft _ “ ri A ■j"i?”s'"1 »iii*V ■«**■> tit * wrs»jt' i 4»Y>fw*-.»Sir^'> v,wi ".■i.,i:.!:L.^i.Y- ■' _ MahlMed June syear, in advance. "v^PMHiSSnKaacantt —n a- a.„n -,r i snow till at length I made my way into the ;>aTLAI3D Is AIL i KH3BB, * main igloo. Nukerton was not dead! She MISCELLANEOUS. MISCELLANEOUS. FOR BALE & TO LET. BUSINESS CARDS. BUSINESS CARlib. soiil, 1’. WiEMAIK. Editor, bieathed,and was much about the same as j merchandise. when I last saw her. I determined then to j ~=' .re puL'Ilehsa st He. 3XKSSXX.ay For Male. U IS SLl WP D « G2*EXCHANGE what I could for the CITY OF Dana & Co. H remain, doing dylug,— PORTLAND subscriber offers his fans* situated in Yar. i%ew & the 1865. Crop Sugar. Ti. A. FOSTER CO. The lamp was nearly out, cold was h»tcuee, PROSPECTUS FOR THEm u h, containing 45 ac es of good i&cd in- the thennometer outside being 51 degrees be- cluding abou' 6 a ires woodland. A two story Fish and SEWING l 8°I«i(l'8n«nUoag|U, and car, Sait, MAC FINES 150 the and I home, wood isg> huus >&. *»nd b »rn wit c-1 ,84 Rrxee Yellow now 1 AroR-rLABX>,>.iur low freezing point; though had on 0 Sugar, l.nding* fro:* FuK3eiapuiiiifiiiedat*s.ot B U NT IE S ! lar an ore an cf about 40 tree*, good Iruit Tl ere f.om M»l>iaaa.
    [Show full text]
  • The B I N N a C
    FALL 2014 THE B INNACLE Cruising Around Croatia Leukemia Cup Raises Record $421,000 Area III and Beer Can Awards Blue Jacket 40 Best Midsize Cruiser, 39–41 Feet Domestic Boat Of The Year 2014 2014 Ultimate Cruising Performance Blue Jacket 40 Blue Jacket 40 Winner of two Boat of the Year Awards from Cruising World, the Blue Jacket redefines the term “performance cruiser”. Complete with the high performance, 3 sail package, she is truly an Blue Jacket 40 In-Stock elegant and modern performance cruiser perfect for the Chicago sailor. Special Columbia Yacht Club Incentive Package Larsen Marine is offering this 2014 model with a special incentive package for Columbia Yacht Club members. Call for incentive details and personal tour of the Blue Jacket 40 in our heated showroom. NEW In-Stock: Dealer of the Year Sun Odyssey 41DS, 409, 379 & 349 Brokerage Marketing and Sales Experts www.larsenmarine.com Boat2 TSales H E & FinancingB I N N A C• Full L E Service F A L L Yard 2 0 1 • 4 Storage • Mobile Service • On Site & Online Ship Store Waukegan, IL (847) 336-5456 Fax (847) 336-5530 Fall 2014 ON THE WateR IN THIS ISSUE 06 RACING 18 CrUISING THROUGH 26 ACTIVITIES Area III and Beer Can results CROATIA Plans are underway for 2015 announced at this year’s Columbia members spend a events and parties—why not Boater’s Bash week cruising the Dalmatian join in the fun? coast 09 POWER FLEET 27 ASSOCIATES It’s been a lovely cruise 20 AMATEUR NIGHT RACE Racing, clubs and more, through the summer The first-ever Goose Island there’s something for every Amateur
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cr-00232-EGS Document 243 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 30
    Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 243 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 17-cr-232 (EGS) v. MICHAEL T. FLYNN, Defendant. REPLY BRIEF FOR COURT-APPOINTED AMICUS CURIAE Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 243 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT.................................................................................................................................. 1 I. The Court Has Discretion Under Rule 48(a) to Deny the Government’s Motion for Leave to Dismiss ........................................................................................................... 1 A. There Is a Live “Case or Controversy” Before the Court....................................... 1 B. The Court Has Discretion to Deny Leave Under Rule 48(a).................................. 2 C. Denial of a Rule 48(a) Motion Is Appropriate Where the Statement of Reasons Is Deficient or Where There Is Evidence of Gross Abuse ....................... 7 II. The Court Should Deny the Government’s Motion for Leave to Dismiss Under Rule 48(a)............................................................................................................... 10 A. The Government’s Statement of Reasons Is Deficient and Pretextual................. 11 1. Materiality................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the TREASURY 31 CFR Part 33 RIN 1505-AC72 DEPARTMENT of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES 45 CFR Parts 155 and 156 [CMS-99
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/19/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-01175, and on govinfo.gov[Billing Code: 4120-01-P] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 31 CFR Part 33 RIN 1505-AC72 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 45 CFR Parts 155 and 156 [CMS-9914-F] RIN 0938-AU18 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2022; Updates to State Innovation Waiver (Section 1332 Waiver) Implementing Regulations AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This final rule sets forth provisions related to user fees for federally-facilitated Exchanges and State-based Exchanges on the Federal Platform. It includes changes related to acceptance of payments by issuers of individual market Qualified Health Plans and clarifies the regulation imposing network adequacy standards with regard to Qualified Health Plans that do not use provider networks. It also adds a new direct enrollment option for federally-facilitated Exchanges and State Exchanges and implements changes related to section 1332 State Innovation Waivers. DATES: These regulations are effective on March 15, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Wu, (301) 492-4305, Rogelyn McLean, (301) 492-4229, Usree Bandyopadhyay, (410) 786-6650, Grace Bristol, (410) 786-8437, or Kiahana Brooks, (301) 492-5229, for general information. Aaron Franz, (410) 786-8027, for matters related to user fees. Robert Yates, (301) 492-5151, for matters related to the direct enrollment option for federally-facilitated Exchange states, State-based Exchanges on the Federal Platform, and State Exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • 1899-10-03, [P ]
    H W^isMM •* "*"1 i\> I C, .1 V "^ItJ «. t * V » f A »*%» — " / f r * •* « t » i'j 4( ^i r ^ J.+ *c f t * «. * r j„ ^ # « •• I • "** ' - - ^.\TJ K **&»,mams, «aei®J5SflffiS©^;..ai.-A" ra»*S5iwf s-Tf,# ;•:% -STJ —^TBS-nrf^-^5* ^ ^ -J ' -ssiwr " ' ' ' J'^l •VMSH?* •*W$ sT-lT'•£''' *S- ** * / 1 v,"~'" .4^«AiTli- •-! - {•••••. L'. ; / •> " .. r r „ •..•'*-. -• •.- --• -•¥"; '•' -*.«-•• rwr^Jv TOr r^5J3>-" ~ %yw«r\IW •*TW»«6, «•';«», $&*$!& * * ORDER THE T.-H. FOR QUICKANDCOMPLKTS NKWS. LAST BDITIONi S O'CLOCK ^jf^y, pr#i :^ I ALU TMt NEWS, ? ^a «••*«•«» a The date In the Dally T.- ? THE RELIABLE NEWS. tOnlDare ^ *lth the dates on S, « ^ THE QUICKEST NEW8, — 1-—— other papers and CO IN THE "T.-H." vince yourselves which paper publishes ««C H* MONTH a* MAIL. SEND THE NEWS FIRST. ADORCSS AND MONCV. Then order the T.-R. (or quickest news. 1 fei -. THREE MONTHS, »V MAIL 91.98' •m. ^VOL.XXV. MARSHALLTOWN. IOWA, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1899 -NT). 248 ing the Shamrock, and drew up on her. silenced the grans of the foe, sunk the 2:40 p. m.—Columbia apparently had hostile fleet, demonstrated the suprem­ slight lead.'; Both are making short acy of American sea power and trans­ tacks and jockeying for position. The ferred to the United States the empire lead is likely to change at any moment. of the islands of the Pacific. Later, by Columbia ipas to windward. your display of large, powers of admin­ First Race Between Columbia and :47 p. m.—The boats have covered Dewey Presented With the Magnifi­ istration, by your pdlse and prudence, Most Alarming Reports on the Situ­ The Harris-Emery Department Store Shamrock Sailed Today—A about a third of the journey back to cent Sword Voted by Congress The Weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of the Courageous Mast Designers’ Forum by Arvel Gentry YACHTING Magazine, February 1975
    Design of the Courageous Mast Designers’ Forum By Arvel Gentry YACHTING Magazine, February 1975 (Arvel Gentry is a research aerodynamicist at the Douglas Aircraft Co., in Long Beach, Cal., and has long had a special fascination for sailboat aerodynamics, a subject with which he has had extensive practical experience on his successful Ranger 23 “Kittiwake.” His non-sailing weekends are spent with such December 1999 design projects as a sailing performance recorder for the new 79' ketch “Kialoa III” and mast shapes for ocean racers and 12-meters. Here he describes the work behind the mast section on the 1974 America's cup defender. Eds.) The America's Cup is defended and challenged by men sailing the most advanced boats afloat, and no 12-Meter skipper would want to go to the starting line with anything but the fastest boat and best equipment that designers and builders can produce. Since very small differences in boatspeed can mean the margin between victory and defeat, every part of the boat (hull, rigging, and sails) is reviewed and studied for any possible improvement. Much was written last summer and fall about hull shape (with the disappointment of the Chance-designed Mariner) and about sails (the Kevlar mainsails and the Hood versus North competition). Although other design Figure 2. Aluminum shapes used to test new spar designs on the author’s Ranger 23 (foreground) and on an Ericson 46 features were less spectacular and less obvious, they were (background). The restrictive 12-Meter rule prohibits any nonetheless important. A case in point was the new mast radical developments, as the similarity of these shapes section shapes that appeared on both the challenger, indicates.
    [Show full text]
  • Situ Tt N Try WILSON
    7 t- y zj i r C i 1 11 j j a r- i I i 1w 4 1 0- f 4 rT 4 LT vJ j J J 1 J oTr4lrhka iss s wss COVlRSJTIOISO y 41v ifWISI o r a- lIT I4M Wb L 1 I z- t II JltII- tb t I D1futtel We saw how Wyacts early work SITu ion hi Wit a same o- tnsm Xl WAl xIUftf1I1If- asia BAr jUc 7Ich not tut his knowledge I The With nf n asia le- It wss UD rIsa pint 1tilt JIb to t did 11UfI JZX NT rtveals ef natural forms and Rut sill I for D to tbe- MX 0 cur conr know th e war la whIch he applied 4 01 Y e a nil 0 tho ftaleb abe liter L If Who J rfor USB tM Oevetmer 4 Wa Rena la a flolltude br Bits Baker that shows Is made an unflivor whiskey Big This 1 YacMs eatker a Ce e tr- OrlqwOhd sad N NICb eel very tbl finishit b t frtm Ota jitt linern Tg Columbia fInished at lea Cr g JsewK li v an equal mastery 01 drawing but what might l L I ABaaal Crate SI New Ttwfc O r- wWo on noire the Claim Is t t fr g eertI OetsnU the dmlopmwt ef this skill can c and M4 n- p tt- The following table ol That tte efWlfrt1 BM la the Afltta U of show siesta aM only es HUM t times Constitution end Columbia Part Teem His Trrttertl bt cooJeotured tar be died at to v ry mlaa Wta Aufcs st eat in Nefle OsSm wast a leg early to guoh Iielntensst over of course Uncls Davy Bill Ii beginning to flirt with have attained perfection Try WILSON The CoBttltutlon the Columbia Th LIO IIIULI BOX of oraftsaanahlp Hut that devalopnjent dftd Com- ¬ rust em He trota over to see the Hon and won one of tbs oup offered br coda tot near the ltlJfH all would bar placed him in the nut rank modore Lewis Ledyard y trday
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Wins America's Cup Races: Captain Is TRB&S Client Anonymous
    University of Mississippi eGrove Touche Ross Publications Deloitte Collection 1965 Constellation wins America's Cup races: Captain is TRB&S client Anonymous Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_tr Part of the Accounting Commons, and the Taxation Commons Recommended Citation Quarterly, Vol. 11, no. 3 (1965, September), p. 31-33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Deloitte Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touche Ross Publications by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Captain is TRB&S CLIENT w& fmebim& twe^ '*,;/•#&•• %»&# The America's Cup, 114 year old trophy won by the yacht America in 1851, has remained in the headquarters of the New York Yacht Club since that time. Last American vic­ tor over the British challengers is Eric Kidder with his 12-Meter yacht, "Constellation". Eric Ridder, of Locust Valley, Long Island, New York, enthroned in the New York Yacht Club through Ameri­ has two widely different titles. In the newspaper, T.V. and can victories over nineteen challengers for its possession. radio world, he is referred to as publisher Eric Ridder. In Americans across the country became aware of the the sea going and yacht loving and sports world he is significance and romance of yachting when Sir Thomas known as Skipper Eric Ridder, captain of the 12-meter Lipton, founder of Lipton, Inc.,* the most successful Eng­ yacht Constellation which, in September of 1964, in the lish yachtsman of his day, tried to return the trophy to 19th of the world-famed America's Gup Races off New­ England.
    [Show full text]
  • Herreshoff Collection Guide [PDF]
    Guide to The Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Collection The Design Records of The Herreshoff Manufacturing Company Bristol, Rhode Island The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collection Kurt Hasselbalch Frances Overcash & Angela Reddin The Francis Russell Hart Nautical Collections MIT Museum Cambridge, Massachusetts © 1997 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. Published by The MIT Museum 265 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 5 Historical Sketch 6 Scope and Content 8 Series Listing 10 Series Description I: Catalog Cards 11 Series Description II: Casting Cards (pattern use records) 12 Series Description III: HMCo Construction Record 13 Series Description IV: Offset Booklets 14 Series Description V: Drawings 26 Series Description VI: Technical and Business Records 38 Series Description VII: Half-Hull Models 55 Series Description VIII: Historic Microfilm 56 Description of Database 58 2 Acknowledgments The Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Project and this guide were made possible by generous private donations. Major funding for the Haffenreffer-Herreshoff Project was received from the Haffenreffer Family Fund, Mr. and Mrs. J. Philip Lee, Joel White (MIT class of 1954) and John Lednicky (MIT class of 1944). We are most grateful for their support. This guide is dedicated to the project donors, and to their belief in making material culture more accessible. We also acknowledge the advice and encouragement given by Maynard Bray, the donors and many other friends and colleagues. Ellen Stone, Manager of the Ships Plans Collection at Mystic Seaport Museum provided valuable cataloging advice. Ben Fuller also provided helpful consultation in organizing database structure. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge the excellent work accomplished by the three individuals who cataloged and processed the entire Haffenreffer-Herrehsoff Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Allendale Columbia School Student and Parent Handbook 2020-2021
    Allendale Columbia School Student and Parent Handbook 2020-2021 Rev. 09-16-2020 Table of Contents Disclaimer 7 Section 1: GENERAL SCHOOL-WIDE INFORMATION 8 Welcome from the Head of School 8 Mission 9 Core Values 9 Diversity Statement 9 History 9 Essential School/Parent Expectations 12 Parents Working with Schools 12 Schools Working with Parents 12 General Policies 13 Non-Discrimination Policy 13 Harassment Policy 13 Communication with Faculty 14 Dress Code 15 Privacy and Non-Solicitation Policy 15 Student Code of Conduct 15 Student Use of Personal Technology 16 Acceptable Use Policy 16 Social Media Policy 17 If you would not bring it into the classroom, do not post it online! 18 Health and Safety 19 Absence and Illness 19 Homework During Absences 20 Tobacco Free Campus 20 Pesticide Use Notification 20 Medicine Policy 20 Nut-Aware Policy 21 Immunizations 21 Health Appraisal Form 22 Allendale Columbia School Student and Parent Handbook Health Requirements for Sports 22 Crisis Planning and Management 22 Communication 23 Scenarios 23 Campus Map 24 Drop Off and Dismissal 26 Morning Drop Off 26 Afternoon Dismissal 26 Middle School 27 Upper School 27 Parking and Car Line Procedures 28 Bus Information 28 School Cancellation/Snow Days/Delays/Early Dismissal 29 Lunch Program 29 Allendale Columbia Special Events and Traditions 30 Homecoming 30 Lower School Socials 30 ​ Grandparents and Special Friends Day 30 Kindergarten Bake Sale 31 Holiday Breakfast 31 Upper School Cabaret 31 Evening of the Arts 31 TEDxAllendaleColumbiaSchool 31 Kite Day 31 Strawberry Breakfast 31 Lower School Moving On Ceremony 32 Middle School Recognition Ceremony 32 Upper School Honors Convocation 32 Commencement 32 AC Encore 32 Field Trips 32 Music Concerts by Division 32 Musicals by Division 32 Upper School Forums 32 Section 2: PARENTS OF ALLENDALE COLUMBIA KIDS (PACK) 34 PACK Officers for 2020-2021 34 ​ Class Liaisons and Traditional Class Responsibilities 34 Helping Hands Assistance 35 PACK By-Laws with Amendments 35 Section 3: PRE-PRIMARY AND LOWER SCHOOL 39 Allendale Columbia School Rev.
    [Show full text]