Spermatophores in the Female's Bursa Copulatrix Accumulated Through
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Orden TRICHOPTERA Manual
Revista IDE@ - SEA, nº 64 (30-06-2015): 1–21. ISSN 2386-7183 1 Ibero Diversidad Entomológica @ccesible www.sea-entomologia.org/IDE@ Clase: Insecta Orden TRICHOPTERA Manual CLASE INSECTA Orden Trichoptera Carmen Zamora-Muñoz1, Marta Sáinz-Bariáin1 & Núria Bonada2 1 Departamento de Zoología. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de Granada. Campus de Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada (España). [email protected] 2 Grup de Recerca Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM), Departament d’Ecologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (España). Imagen superior: Óleo con larva y adulto de tricóptero. Autora: Ana Sánz. 1. Breve definición del grupo y principales caracteres diagnósticos Los tricópteros o frigáneas (Trichoptera, del griego trichos, "pelo" y pteron, "ala") son artrópodos de la Clase Insecta cuyos adultos portan alas cubiertas de pilosidad. Casi todas sus especies dependen del medio acuático para su desarrollo. La mayoría habitan en ríos y arroyos de aguas limpias y bien oxigena- das, aunque también se pueden encontrar en ambientes lénticos, terrestres e incluso marinos. Forman un grupo natural y están cercanamente emparentados con las mariposas y polillas (Lepi- doptera), que tienen escamas en sus alas y, como ellos, son capaces de producir seda. Ambos forman el superorden Amphiesmenoptera. De hecho, el grupo es sobre todo conocido por la habilidad de sus larvas para fabricar, con seda y diversos materiales, una gran variedad de construcciones como estuches portáti- les (Figura 1), refugios fijos, redes para la recogida de alimento y galerías, por lo que también se les ha denominado “arquitectos subacuáticos” (Mackay & Wiggins, 1979; Wiggins, 2004). Aunque para la cons- trucción de los estuches los tricópteros utilizan el material disponible en el lecho del río, el tipo y disposi- ción de las piezas que usan suele tener un marcado carácter filogenético (https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=3vr6Z54LJtM&spfreload=10). -
List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa -
Effects of Resource-Dependent Cannibalism on Population Size Distribution and Individual Life History in a Case-Bearing Caddisfly
RESEARCH ARTICLE Effects of resource-dependent cannibalism on population size distribution and individual life history in a case-bearing caddisfly Jun-ichi Okano1*, Noboru Okuda1,2 1 Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Hirano, Otsu, Shiga, Japan, 2 Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Motoyama, Kamigamo, Kyoto, Japan a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 Resource availability often determines the intensity of cannibalism, which has a consider- able effect on population size distribution and individual life history. Larvae of the caddisfly Psilotreta kisoensis build portable cases from sedimentary sands and often display canni- OPEN ACCESS balism. For this species, the availability of preferable case material is a critical factor that Citation: Okano J-i, Okuda N (2018) Effects of affects larval fitness, and material is locally variable depending on the underlying geology. In resource-dependent cannibalism on population this study, we investigated how sand quality as a case material determines cannibalism fre- size distribution and individual life history in a case- quency among larvae and, in turn, how the differential cannibalism frequency affects the bearing caddisfly. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0191925. body-size distribution and voltinism. Rearing experiments within a cohort revealed that a https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191925 bimodal size distribution developed regardless of material quality. However, as the prefera- Editor: Robert B. Srygley, USDA Agricultural ble material became abundant, the proportion of larger to smaller individuals increased. Research Service, UNITED STATES Consecutive experiments suggested that smaller larvae were more frequently cannibalized Received: September 19, 2017 by larger ones and excluded from the population when preferable smooth material was Accepted: January 12, 2018 abundant. -
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying -
Microsoft Outlook
Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA). -
The Trichoptera of North Carolina
Families and genera within Trichoptera in North Carolina Spicipalpia (closed-cocoon makers) Integripalpia (portable-case makers) RHYACOPHILIDAE .................................................60 PHRYGANEIDAE .....................................................78 Rhyacophila (Agrypnia) HYDROPTILIDAE ...................................................62 (Banksiola) Oligostomis (Agraylea) (Phryganea) Dibusa Ptilostomis Hydroptila Leucotrichia BRACHYCENTRIDAE .............................................79 Mayatrichia Brachycentrus Neotrichia Micrasema Ochrotrichia LEPIDOSTOMATIDAE ............................................81 Orthotrichia Lepidostoma Oxyethira (Theliopsyche) Palaeagapetus LIMNEPHILIDAE .....................................................81 Stactobiella (Anabolia) GLOSSOSOMATIDAE ..............................................65 (Frenesia) Agapetus Hydatophylax Culoptila Ironoquia Glossosoma (Limnephilus) Matrioptila Platycentropus Protoptila Pseudostenophylax Pycnopsyche APATANIIDAE ..........................................................85 (fixed-retreat makers) Apatania Annulipalpia (Manophylax) PHILOPOTAMIDAE .................................................67 UENOIDAE .................................................................86 Chimarra Neophylax Dolophilodes GOERIDAE .................................................................87 (Fumanta) Goera (Sisko) (Goerita) Wormaldia LEPTOCERIDAE .......................................................88 PSYCHOMYIIDAE ....................................................68 -
Of the Korean Peninsula
Journal288 of Species Research 9(3):288-323, 2020JOURNAL OF SPECIES RESEARCH Vol. 9, No. 3 A checklist of Trichoptera (Insecta) of the Korean Peninsula Sun-Jin Park and Dongsoo Kong* Department of Life Science, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] A revised checklist of Korean Trichoptera is provided for the species recorded from the Korean Peninsula, including both North and South Korea. The checklist includes bibliographic research as well as results after reexamination of some specimens. For each species, we provide the taxonomic literature that examined Korean Trichoptera materials or mentioned significant taxonomic treatments regarding to Korean species. We also provide the records of unnamed species based on larval identification for further study. Based on taxonomic considerations, 20 species among the previously known nominal species in Korea are deleted or synonymized, and three species omitted from the previous lists, Hydropsyche athene Malicky and Chantaramongkol, 2000, H. simulata Mosely, 1942 and Helicopsyche coreana Mey, 1991 are newly added to the checklist. Hydropsyche formosana Ulmer, 1911 is recorded from the Korean Peninsula for the first time by the identification of Hydropsyche KD. In addition, we recognized 14 species of larvae separated with only tentative alphabetic designations. As a result, this new Korean Trichoptera checklist includes 218 currently recognized species in 66 genera and 25 families from the Korean Peninsula. Keywords: caddisflies, catalogue, history, North Korea, South Korea Ⓒ 2020 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2020.9.3.288 INTRODUCTION Democratic Republic (North Korea). Since the mid 1970s, several scientists within the Republic of Korea (South Trichoptera is the seventh-largest order among Insecta, Korea) have studied Trichoptera. -
Trichopterological Literature 1988 1981
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Braueria Jahr/Year: 1991 Band/Volume: 18 Autor(en)/Author(s): Malicky Hans Artikel/Article: Trichopterological Literature 23-28 © Hans Malicky/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 23 TRICHOPTEROLOGICAL LITERATURE 1988 Benson,L.J., Pearson,R.G., 1988, Diversity 1981 and _ seasonality of adult Trichoptera captured in a light-trap at Yuccabine McFarlane,A.G., Cowie,B., 1981, Descriptions Creek, a tropical Australian rainforest of new species and notes on some genera of stream. - Aust.J.Ecol. 13:337-344. New Zealand Trichoptera. - Rec.Canterbury Mus.9:353-385. Cianficconi,F., Moretti, G.P., Di Domenico,M., 1988, I Tricotteri del F.Vomano. - Boll.Mus.St.Nat.Lunigiana 1985 6-7(1986-1987): 151-155. Hönel,B., 1985, Ökologische Untersuchungen Dumnicka.E., Kasza.H., Kownacki.A., über die Trichopterenfauna des Frohns- und Krzyzanek.E., Kuflikowski,T., 1988, Effects Geißbaches (Saarland, Buntsandstein). of regulated stream on the hydrochemistry Dipl.-Arb., Univ.Saarbrücken. and zoobenthos in differently polluted parts of the upper Vistula River (Southern Neel,J.K.,Sr., 1985, A northern prairie Poland). - Hydrobiologia 169:183-191. stream. - Univ.of North Dakota Press, 274 pp. Kohl,R., 1988, Limnologisch-ökologische Untersuchungen an saarländischen Gewässern Ruiter.D.E., Lavigne,R.J., 1985, Distribution unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der of Wyoming Trichoptera. - People.Crops, Trichopterenfauna. - Diss.Univ.Saarbrücken, Soils, Livestock (Agr.Exper.Stat.,Univ.of math.-nat.Fak., 172 pp. Wyoming), SM 47, 102pp. Moretti,G.P., Cianficconi,F., Peroni,E., TogashijI., Tanida,K., 1985, Insects intruded Ronca,M., 1988, Considerazioni sulle into a tunnel. -
DBR Y W OREGON STATE
The Distribution and Biology of the A. 15 Oregon Trichoptera PEE .1l(-.", DBR Y w OREGON STATE Technical Bulletin 134 AGRICULTURAL 11 EXPERIMENTI STATION Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon INovember 1976 FOREWORD There are four major groups of insectswhoseimmature stages are almost all aquatic: the caddisflies (Trichoptera), the dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata), the mayflies (Ephemeroptera), and the stoneflies (Plecoptera). These groups are conspicuous and important elements in most freshwater habitats. There are about 7,000 described species of caddisflies known from the world, and about 1,200 of these are found in America north of Mexico. All play a significant ro'e in various aquatic ecosystems, some as carnivores and others as consumers of plant tissues. The latter group of species is an important converter of plant to animal biomass. Both groups provide food for fish, not only in larval but in pupal and adult stages as well. Experienced fishermen have long imitated these larvae and adults with a wide variety of flies and other artificial lures. It is not surprising, then, that the caddisflies have been studied in detail in many parts of the world, and Oregon, with its wide variety of aquatic habitats, is no exception. Any significant accumulation of these insects, including their various develop- mental stages (egg, larva, pupa, adult) requires the combined efforts of many people. Some collect, some describe new species or various life stages, and others concentrate on studying and describing the habits of one or more species. Gradually, a body of information accumulates about a group of insects for a particular region, but this information is often widely scattered and much effort is required to synthesize and collate the knowledge. -
Baseline Nongame Wildlife Surveys on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation
BASELINE NONGAME WILDLIFE SURVEYS ON THE FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION Prepared for: Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation Office of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 1027 Poplar, MT 59255 Tribal Government Resolution: #26-571-2012-03 Prepared by: Paul Hendricks, Susan Lenard, David Stagliano and Bryce A. Maxell Montana Natural Heritage Program A cooperative program of the Montana State Library and the University of Montana March 2013 i © 2013 Montana Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 201800, 1515 East Sixth Avenue, Helena, MT 59620-1800, 406-444-5354 This document should be cited as follows: Hendricks, P., S. Lenard, D. Stagliano, and B. A. Maxell. 2013. Baseline nongame wildlife surveys on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. Report to the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 83 pages. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A variety of animal surveys were conducted during summer (May- September) 2012 as a baseline assessment of nongame wildlife on tribal lands on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in northeastern Montana, the focus being all vertebrate groups (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, small mammals) and some aquatic invertebrate taxa (e.g. Mussels, Dragonflies) using relatively native habitats. Results of the surveys are intended to help guide stewardship and management of tribal lands as needs arise, whether they are in response to energy exploration and development, conflicts in land use practices, threats from invasive or non-native species, or other land management concerns. Of 72 total stream sites visited, fish were documented at 36 of 55 sites with water. -
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp. -
Surveys to Determine the Status of the Northern
SURVEYS TO DETERMINE THE STATUS OF THE NORTHERN FORESTFLY (LEDNIA BOREALIS) AND RAINIER ROACHFLY (SOLIPERLA FENDERI) ON THE OKANOGAN-WENATCHEE AND GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FORESTS OF WASHINGTON: YEAR 2 FINAL REPORT FROM THE XERCES SOCIETY TO THE INTERAGENCY SPECIAL STATUS / SENSITIVE SPECIES PROGRAM (ISSSSP) Assistance Agreement L13AC00102, Modification 4 Alpine creek near Rampart Lakes in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, WA BY CANDACE FALLON, MICHELE BLACKBURN, AND EMILIE BLEVINS THE XERCES SOCIETY FOR INVERTEBRATE CONSERVATION MARCH 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lednia borealis ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Soliperla fenderi ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................