DOCSLIB.ORG

Of the Korean Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of the Korean Peninsula Journal288 of Species Research 9(3):288-323, 2020JOURNAL OF SPECIES RESEARCH Vol. 9, No. 3 A checklist of Trichoptera (Insecta) of the Korean Peninsula Sun-Jin Park and Dongsoo Kong* Department of Life Science, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea *Correspondent: [email protected] A revised checklist of Korean Trichoptera is provided for the species recorded from the Korean Peninsula, including both North and South Korea. The checklist includes bibliographic research as well as results after reexamination of some specimens. For each species, we provide the taxonomic literature that examined Korean Trichoptera materials or mentioned significant taxonomic treatments regarding to Korean species. We also provide the records of unnamed species based on larval identification for further study. Based on taxonomic considerations, 20 species among the previously known nominal species in Korea are deleted or synonymized, and three species omitted from the previous lists, Hydropsyche athene Malicky and Chantaramongkol, 2000, H. simulata Mosely, 1942 and Helicopsyche coreana Mey, 1991 are newly added to the checklist. Hydropsyche formosana Ulmer, 1911 is recorded from the Korean Peninsula for the first time by the identification of Hydropsyche KD. In addition, we recognized 14 species of larvae separated with only tentative alphabetic designations. As a result, this new Korean Trichoptera checklist includes 218 currently recognized species in 66 genera and 25 families from the Korean Peninsula. Keywords: ‌caddisflies, catalogue, history, North Korea, South Korea Ⓒ 2020 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2020.9.3.288 INTRODUCTION Democratic Republic (North Korea). Since the mid 1970s, several scientists within the Republic of Korea (South Trichoptera is the seventh-largest order among Insecta, Korea) have studied Trichoptera. Despite the various re- with more than 16,000 extant species (Morse et al., 2019). search materials, the knowledge about Trichoptera fauna This order also has more species than the total combined in Korea is still insufficient because of sporadic and un- with other primarily aquatic insect orders (Ephemeroptera, sustained studies. In addition, some species were record- Odonata, Plecoptera and Megaloptera) (Holzenthal et al., ed only based on their larval stage by reference to mostly 2007; Morse et al., 2019). The adults of this holometab- Japanese literature, and research on larva-adult associa- olous order are mainly aerial, terrestrial and nocturnal, tions using Korean materials is lacking. but their eggs, larvae and pupae mostly live in freshwa- Several checklists of Korean caddisflies have been ter. The larvae have a very unique character of producing published by some North and South Korean entomolo- silk, and attaching various materials from the aquatic en- gists (Cho, 1955; Ju, 1969; Yoon and Kim, 1994; Park vironment using the silk to build multiple types of cases and Bae, 1998b; Cho, 2003; Choi and Ko, 2006; Hwang, and retreats. Trichoptera is an essential component of the 2010; Jung et al., 2011). Recently, the National Institute aquatic ecosystem because they have been adapted to the of Biological Resources (Incheon, South Korea) pub- most aquatic habitats and contribute to the transfer of en- lished checklists of Korean insects including caddisflies, ergy and nutrients through the trophic levels of all fresh- based on the registered species in the National List of water ecosystems (Wiggins, 1996). Species of Korea (Hwang, 2012; Ahn et al., 2013; Park Taxonomic studies on Trichoptera from the Korean et al., 2019). However, the list overlooked some records Peninsula (Korea) have been intermittently conducted of Korean Trichoptera species and taxonomic treatments since the 1920s. From the 1920s to the 1950s, all the such as synonymy. Therefore, a revised checklist of Kore- Korean Trichoptera records were done by a few Japa- an Trichoptera based on scientific and taxonomic consid- nese scientists. After that time until the early 1990s, most eration is required in Korea. taxonomic studies were performed by a few European In this study, we provide an amended checklist of Ko- taxonomists, using materials from the Korean People′s rean Trichoptera based on not only bibliographic surveys August 2020 Park and Kong. Checklist of Korean Trichoptera 289 but also the reexamination of some specimens. We list (Stenopsychidae); Stactobia makartschenkoi Botosanea- the species included in taxonomic publications concerned nu and Levanidova, 1988 (Hydroptilidae); Glossosoma with Korean Trichoptera, but exclude some publications boltoni Curtis, 1834 (Glossosomatidae); Rhyacophila which provided only “Korea” as a distribution area, bib- hokkaidensis Iwata, 1927, R. nigrocephala Iwata, 1927 liographic checklists or illustration books. The records (Rhyacophilidae); Agrypnia pagetana Curtis, 1835, solely based on the larval stage without any descriptions Semblis melaleuca (McLachlan, 1871) (Phryganeidae); or illustrations are also excluded, but some publications Lepidostoma ebenacanthus (Ito, 1992), L. japonicum including important information of Korean fauna are (Tsuda, 1936) (Lepidostomatidae); Goera pilosa (Fa- mentioned. There are many records of unnamed species bricius, 1775) (Goeridae); Dicosmoecus obscuripennis separated with or without only tentative alphabetic des- Banks, 1938 (Limnephilidae); and Psilotreta kisoensis ignations in Korea. We provide their information for the Iwata, 1928 (Odontoceridae). Three species, Stenopsy- future study. che sauteri Ulmer, 1907 (Stenopsychidae); Glossosoma In the checklist, we followed Morse et al. (2019) and intermedium (Klapálek, 1892) (Glossosomatidae); and Thomas et al. (2020) for the higher classification, and Oligotricha fulvipes Matsumura, 1904 (Phryganeidae), subfamilies, genera and species are arranged alphabet- which appeared in some illustration books or checklists ically in each family. The recorded country (North or (Esaki et al., 1938; Kuwayama, 1949; Takeuchi, 1955; South Korea), provincial localities, sex or stage, and Ko- Hwang, 2012; Yang et al., 2016) are also removed be- rean name of each species are provided. In case of giving cause there have not been any Korean records for them. new Korean names or correcting former Korean names, On the other hand, Hydropsyche athene Malicky and we put an asterisk beside the Korean name. The abbre- Chantaramongkol, 2000, H. simulata Mosely, 1942 (Hy- viations used in this list are as follows: N (North Korea) dropsychidae); and Helicopsyche coreana Mey, 1991 and S (South Korea) for countries; CB (Chungcheong- (Helicopsychidae), which were omitted from the previ- buk-do), CN (Chungcheongnam-do), GB (Gyeongsang- ous checklists are added to this list, and Hydropsyche buk-do), GG (Gyeonggi-do), GN (Gyeongsangnam-do), formosana Ulmer, 1911 (Hydropsychidae) is recorded GW (Gangwon-do), HGB (Hamgyeongbuk-do), HGN from the Korean Peninsula for the first time by the iden- (Hamgyeongnam-do), HHB (Hwanghaebuk-do), HHN tification ofHydropsyche KD. (Hwanghaenam-do), JB (Jeollabuk-do), JJ (Jeju-do), JN Additionally, we recognized 14 unnamed species sep- (Jeollanam-do), NGW (Gangwon-do in North Korea), PB arated with only tentative alphabetic designations as (Pyeonganbuk-do), PN (Pyeongannam-do), PY (Pyeong- follows: Hydropsyche KD as Hydropsyche formosana yang), RG (Ryanggang-do) and SL (Seoul) for provinces; Ulmer, 1911, Hydropsyche KF and Hydropsyche KUb A (adult), M (male adult), F (female adult), P (pupa) and L as Hydropsyche kozhantschikovi Martynov, 1924 (Hy- (larva) for sex or stage. dropsychidae); Apsilochorema KUa as Apsilochorema sutshanum Martynov, 1934 (Hydrobiosidae); Rhyacoph- ila sp. KA as Rhyacophila lata Martynov, 1918, Rhy- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION acophila sp. KB as Rhyacophila narvae Navás, 1926, Rhyacophila sp. RC as Rhyacophila retracta Martynov, In North Korean checklists (Ju, 1969; Lee and Kim, 1914, Rhyacophila sp. RE as Rhyacophila shikotsuensis 1993; Choi and Ko, 2006; Ahn et al., 2013), we found Iwata, 1927 (Rhyacophilidae); Oligotricha sp. as Oli- the records of Himalopsyche japonica (Morton, 1900) gotricha lapponica (Hagen, 1864), Neuronia sp. KA as (Rhyacophilidae), Semblis melaleuca (McLachlan, Semblis phalaenoides (Linnaeus, 1758) (Phryganeidae); 1871) (Phryganeidae), Uenoa tokunagai Iwata, 1927 Neophylax sp. KA as Neophylax ussuriensis (Martynov, (Uenoidae) and Perissoneura paradoxa McLachlan, 1914) (Uenoidae); Asynarchus KUa as Asynarchus amu- 1871 (Odontoceridae). They were based on the larval rensis (Ulmer, 1905) (Limnephilidae); Leptocerus sp. identification from North Korea and did not include any KD as Ceraclea shuotsuensis (Tsuda, 1942) (Leptoceri- detailed information. We did not include these species dae); and Gumaga KUa as Gumaga orientalis (Martynov, even at the generic level although these genera, un- 1935) (Sericostomatidae). In addition, we listed many known from Korea at present, may be found in the fu- unnamed ′species′ separated by the larval morphology. ture. As a result, 218 nominal species belonging to 66 gen- The following species have been removed from the era and 25 families were recognized in this study, but previously known Korean Trichoptera due to misidenti- 12 species of them were recorded only based on larval fications, synonyms or taxonomic problems mentioned identifications. Further study on Korean caddisfly fauna, in remarks for each species: Arctopsyche spinifera Ul- especially faunistic studies based on adult materials and mer, 1907, Hydropsyche
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Need and Reasonableness: August 10, 2012
    CADDISFLIES ONLY Notations Used E Endangered T Threatened SC Special Concern N None (location records maintained by DNR, in most cases) N (X) None, and probably extirpated from Minnesota (location records maintained by DNR, in most cases) -- None (location records not yet maintained by DNR) * Change in scientific name accompanies change in status CHANGE IN STATUS; STATUS SHEET PROVIDED Common Name Scientific Name Current Proposed Status Status A Species of Northern Caddisfly Anabolia ozburni -- SC * A Species of Northern Caddisfly Asynarchus rossi SC T A Species of Long Horned Caddisfly Ceraclea brevis SC N Vertrees's Ceraclean Caddisfly Ceraclea vertreesi SC N Headwaters Chilostigman Caddisfly Chilostigma itascae E T A Species of Caddisfly Goera stylata -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila novicola SC N A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila quinola -- SC A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila rono -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Hydroptila waskesia -- E A Species of Northern Caddisfly Ironoquia punctatissima -- T A Species of Caddisfly Lepidostoma libum -- T A Species of Northern Caddisfly Limnephilus janus -- E A Species of Northern Caddisfly Limnephilus secludens -- E A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Ochrotrichia spinosa -- E A Species of Long Horned Caddisfly Oecetis ditissa -- T A Species of Purse Casemaker Caddisfly Oxyethira ecornuta SC T A Species of Netspinning Caddisfly Parapsyche apicalis -- T A Species of Tube Casemaker Caddisfly Polycentropus glacialis -- T A Species
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation for US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements
    Draft Biological Evaluation for US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Prepared for: US Forest Service, Chippewa National Forest Minnesota Department of Natural Resources May 2014 US Highwy 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Biological Evaluation This Biological Evaluation was prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, National Forest Management Act, and other applicable laws and regulations. For additional information, please contact the team leader for the US Trunk Highway 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Project. Ms. Christine Brown Chippewa National Forest Address: 200 Ash Avenue NW Cass Lake, MN 56633 Phone: (218) 335-8600 TTY: (218) 335-8632 FAX: (218)335-8637 Prepared by: ______________________________________ _______________ Antony Randazzo, HDR Engineering, Inc. Date Reviewed by: ______________________________________ _______________ Kirk W. Larson, U.S. Forest Service Date Chippewa National Forest Reviewed by: ______________________________________ _______________ Cory Mlodik, U.S. Forest Service Date Chippewa National Forest May 2014 Signature Page Page i US Highwy 2 Passing Lane and Turn Lane Improvements Biological Evaluation Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 1993 Band/Volume: 0025_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Malicky Hans Artikel/Article: Neue asiatische Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Psychomyidae, Ecnomidae, Hydropsychidae, Leptoceridae). 1099-1136 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 25/2 1099-1136 31.12.1993 Neue asiatische Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera: Philopotamidae, Polycentropodidae, Psychomyidae, Ecnomidae, Hydropsychidae, Leptoceridae) H. MALICKY Abstract. New species of caddisflies are described and figured which were found in Pakistan, India, Burma, Nepal, China, Malaysia, Sumatra, Sulawesi, Brunei, the Philippines (Luzon, Palawan, Sibuyan, Tawi Tawi), Western New Guinea and the Bismarck Islands, and which belong to the genera Chimarra (16 species), Doloclanes (1), Pseudoneureclipsis (4), Plectrocnemia (2), Nyctiophylax (6), Polyplectropus (7), Psychomyia (9), Padangpsyche nov.gen.(l), Tinodes (1), Ecnomus (4), Hydromanicus (4) and Leptocerus (5). The male genitalia of Plectrocnemia tortosa BANKS, Polyplectropus javanicus ULMER, Psychomyia fulmeki (ULMER), P. thienemanni (ULMER), Ecnomus tagalensis (BANKS), E. pseudotenellus ULMER and E. robustior ULMER are figured for comparison. Hier lege ich wieder einige Neubeschreibungen nach Material verschiede- ner Herkunft vor. Wenn nicht extra anders angegeben, habe ich es selber
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometries of Two Californian Populations of Gumaga Nigricula (Mclachlan 1871) (Trichoptera: Sericostomatidae)12
    Morphometries of two Californian populations of Gumaga nigricula (McLachlan 1871) (Trichoptera: Sericostomatidae)12 Jorge A. Santiago-Blay3 J. Agrie, Univ. RR. 80(3):157-167 (1996) ABSTRACT Eighty Gumaga nigricula larvae from Hopland Spring and Big Sulphur Creek, northern California, USA, were studied to quantify possible dissimi­ larities among them. The populations are statistically different in two meris- tic characters: number of setae on the anterior margin of the pronotum and number of pleural sclerites on abdominal segment VIII. They also appear to be different in a continuous character, head width/length ratio. In all cases, specimens from Big Sulphur Creek have statistically significant higher val­ ues. These data are congruent with the hypothesis that there is biologically significant genetic isolation between these populations. Key words: Morphometries, Gumaga, Trichoptera, morphology, systematics, ecological indicator RESUMEN Morfometría en dos poblaciones california ñas de Gumaga nigricula (McLachlan 1871) {Trichoptera: Sericostomatidae) Ochenta larvas de Gumaga nigricula provenientes del Hopland Spring y del Big Sulphur Creek en el norte de California, Estados Unidos, se estudia­ ron para cuantificar las posibles diferencias entre ellas. Estas poblaciones son estadísticamente diferentes en dos características merísticas: el nú­ mero de cerdas en el margen anterior del pronoto y el número de escleritos pleurales en el segmento abdominal VIH. Estas poblaciones también pare­ cen ser diferentes en la característica continua, cociente ancho/largo de la 'Manuscript submitted to Editorial Board 15 February 1995, 2I wish to thank V. R. Resh for providing laboratory facilities, literature, and speci­ mens for this study. J. R. Wood also provided specimens, excellent advice, and a preview of the conclusions of his doctoral dissertation on the taxonomic question addressed in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 69-95 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.10 Biodiversity, DNA barcoding data and ecological traits of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) in the catchment area of the Mediterranean karst River Cetina (Croatia) IVAN VUČKOVIĆ1*, MLADEN KUČINIĆ2**, ANĐELA ĆUKUŠIĆ3, MARIJANA VUKOVIĆ4, RENATA ĆUK5, SVJETLANA STANIĆ-KOŠTROMAN6, DARKO CERJANEC7 & MLADEN PLANTAK1 1Elektroprojekt d.d., Civil and Architectural Engineering Department, Section of Ecology, Alexandera von Humboldta 4, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mails:[email protected]; [email protected] 2Department of Biology (Laboratory for Entomology), Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 3Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development, Radnička cesta 80/7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 4Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] 5Hrvatske vode, Central Water Management Laboratory, Ulica grada Vukovara 220, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail:[email protected] 6Faculty of Science and Education, University of Mostar, Matice hrvatske bb, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E-mail: [email protected] 7Primary School Barilović, Barilović 96, 47252 Barilović and Primary School Netretić, Netretić 1, 47271 E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author: [email protected] **Equally contributing author Received 2 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 19 July 2021 │ Published online 2 August 2021. Abstract The environmental and faunistic research conducted included defining the composition and distribution of caddisflies collected using ultraviolet (UV) light trap at 11 stations along the Cetina River, from the spring to the mouth, and also along its tributaries the Ruda River and the Grab River with two sampling stations each, and the Rumin River with one station.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Urban Pollution Influence Macroinvertebrate Traits In
    water Article How does Urban Pollution Influence Macroinvertebrate Traits in Forested Riverine Systems? Augustine O. Edegbene 1,* , Francis O. Arimoro 2 and Oghenekaro N. Odume 1 1 Unilever Centre for Environmental Water Quality, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown) 6140, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Biology (Applied Hydrobiology Unit), Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 65, Minna, Nigeria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: The influence of urbanization on macroinvertebrate traits was explored in forested rivers in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Physico-chemical variables were sampled on a monthly basis alongside macroinvertebrates in 20 sites of 11 rivers spanning 2008–2012. Physico-chemical variables were used to classify the 20 sites into three ecological classes, namely: least impacted sites (LIS), moderately impacted sites (MIS) and highly impacted sites (HIS) using principal component analysis. Our results based on RLQ (R = physico-chemical variables, L = macroinvertebrate taxa and Q = macroinvertebrate traits) and fourth-corner analyses revealed that large body size, grazing and hardshell were positively significantly associated with LIS on the RLQ. They were also either negatively correlated with any two of water temperature, nutrients, BOD5 and flow velocity or positively significantly correlated with increasing DO. Thus, these traits were considered sensitive to urban pollution in forested rivers. Burrowing, predation and pupa aquatic stage, which were positively associated with HIS, were also significantly negatively correlated with increasing DO, and were deemed tolerant of urban pollution in forested rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 2
    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Minnesota Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera)
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources BIODIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CADDISFLIES (INSECTA: TRICHOPTERA) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY DAVID CHARLES HOUGHTON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ralph W. Holzenthal, Advisor August 2002 1 © David Charles Houghton 2002 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As is often the case, the research that appears here under my name only could not have possibly been accomplished without the assistance of numerous individuals. First and foremost, I sincerely appreciate the assistance of my graduate advisor, Dr. Ralph. W. Holzenthal. His enthusiasm, guidance, and support of this project made it a reality. I also extend my gratitude to my graduate committee, Drs. Leonard C. Ferrington, Jr., Roger D. Moon, and Bruce Vondracek, for their helpful ideas and advice. I appreciate the efforts of all who have collected Minnesota caddisflies and accessioned them into the University of Minnesota Insect Museum, particularly Roger J. Blahnik, Donald G. Denning, David A. Etnier, Ralph W. Holzenthal, Jolanda Huisman, David B. MacLean, Margot P. Monson, and Phil A. Nasby. I also thank David A. Etnier (University of Tennessee), Colin Favret (Illinois Natural History Survey), and Oliver S. Flint, Jr. (National Museum of Natural History) for making caddisfly collections available for my examination. The laboratory assistance of the following individuals-my undergraduate "army"-was critical to the processing of the approximately one half million caddisfly specimens examined during this study and I extend my thanks: Geoffery D. Archibald, Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera
    Review Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera John C. Morse 1,*, Paul B. Frandsen 2,3, Wolfram Graf 4 and Jessica A. Thomas 5 1 Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, E-143 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant & Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 701 E University Parkway Drive, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20024, USA 4 BOKU, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York Y010 5DD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-864-656-5049 Received: 2 February 2019; Accepted: 12 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The holometabolous insect order Trichoptera (caddisflies) includes more known species than all of the other primarily aquatic orders of insects combined. They are distributed unevenly; with the greatest number and density occurring in the Oriental Biogeographic Region and the smallest in the East Palearctic. Ecosystem services provided by Trichoptera are also very diverse and include their essential roles in food webs, in biological monitoring of water quality, as food for fish and other predators (many of which are of human concern), and as engineers that stabilize gravel bed sediment. They are especially important in capturing and using a wide variety of nutrients in many forms, transforming them for use by other organisms in freshwaters and surrounding riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Ecological Performance and Aquatic Insect Diversity in High
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2012 Patterns of Ecological Performance and Aquatic Insect Diversity in High Quality Protected Area Networks Jason Lesley Robinson University of Tennessee Knoxville, [email protected] Recommended Citation Robinson, Jason Lesley, "Patterns of Ecological Performance and Aquatic Insect Diversity in High Quality Protected Area Networks. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1342 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jason Lesley Robinson entitled "Patterns of Ecological Performance and Aquatic Insect Diversity in High Quality Protected Area Networks." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. James A. Fordyce, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: J. Kevin Moulton, Nathan J. Sanders, Daniel Simberloff, Charles R. Parker Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Patterns of Ecological Performance and Aquatic Insect Diversity in High Quality Protected Area Networks A Dissertation Presented for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jason Lesley Robinson May 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Jason Lesley Robinson All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]