Doctoral Dissertation by Yongsheng Huang

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Doctoral Dissertation by Yongsheng Huang Integrative Statistical Learning with Applications to Predicting Features of Diseases and Health by Yongsheng Huang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Bioinformatics) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Alfred O. Hero III, Co-Chair Professor Jay L. Hess, Co-Chair Professor Daniel Burns Jr Professor Gilbert S. Omenn Associate Professor Kerby Shedden © Yongsheng Huang 2011 All Rights Reserved I dedicate this dissertation to my parents and my sisters. It is their unconditional love that gave me the courage and perseverance to continue on this long and winding road towards personal and professional improvement. For so many years, they have quietly and patiently waited for me to grow up. I dedicate this work to my true friend Jiehua Guo who is like my brother and helped me tremendously at many critical moments along this journey. I also dedicate my dissertation to the University of Michigan for granting me such a privilege to its invaluable educational resources. The time I spent studying here will always be one of the most significant parts of my life. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is not even remotely possible without the guidance from Professor Alfred Hero, period. Professor Hero brought me into the world of mathematical statistics and taught me the true meaning of statistical thinking. He often worked with me late into the night and early in the morning, going through each analysis that I have performed and every sentence of manuscripts that I have written. He demonstrated the dedication and rigorous attitude towards science. Most important, he always challenged my intellectual capacity by showing me multiple elegant statistical approaches to a problem. That is the most powerful formula to motivate my desire to study more and think harder. And that is when I overcome the laziness inside of me and abandon the temptation to settle for easy solution. Dr. Jay Hess, kindly welcomed me into his laboratory to work with him and his team on the important problem of Hoxa9 protein. His scientific vision provided the biggest support to my research at the most challenging time when things do not piece together and make sense. He encouraged me to take the responsibility and ownership of my research and accepted my mistakes with forgiveness. As a mentor, both Prof. Hero and Dr. Hess genuinely care about my career development. They provided me complete academic freedom to pursue my research interests and to develop my professional skills. They showed, by example, the passion, scholarship, and mastery to scientific research. They emphasize and foster independent thinking and problem-solving ability. There has never been a doubt in my mind that I was granted a once-in-a-lifetime privilege to work with these two great mentors. iii During my study in Bioinformatics, Dr. Omenn has always been on my side whenever I make important decisions. From finding academic mentors to choosing post-graduation career path, I have always been prepared and blessed with his wisdom, encouragement, and positive energy. Professor Daniel Burns went his way to help me even before I arrived at Michigan. Over the years, he helped me so many times that I lost my count. But I do know, my experience would have been much much harder without his help. Professor Kerby Shedden is the first committee member I met before everyone else. He interviewed me on the recruitment day and we got to know each other since. He is kind and supportive to me and my research. But, what I would say if i were asked what I will always remember from all my interactions with him? Without a second of doubt, I would say it has to be the four words he gave me on the study of statistics — “know the stuff cold”. Plain simple! I never stopped working on it. Over the years, I have also been very fortunate to have the opportunities to collaborate with four groups of exceptional researchers from all around the world. I thank Dr. Aimee Zaas, Dr. Geoffrey Ginsberg, Dr. Christopher Woods, Dr. Timothy Veldman, Ms. Chris- tine Øien in the Duke University for the exceptional challenge study they have managed and the invaluable discussion they provided to my research. I also thank members of the Hess laboratory, especially Dr. Kajal Sitwala, Joel Bronstein, Daniel Sanders, and Mon- isha Dandekar. They have provided me superb data and biological insights. I thank Dr. Gordon Robertson and Mr. Timothee Cezard at the Genome Science Center in Vancouver, Canada. They generously shared with me their valuable knowledge on ChIP-sequencing. Particularly, I thank Dr. Robertson who literally taught me everything that I needed to know about next-generation sequencing analysis and showed me how quality research is done in high speed. I am also thankful to the members of Hero group, particularly Dr. Mark Kliger, Dr. Arvind Rao, Dr. Patrick Harrington, Mr. Yilun Chen, Mr. Kevin Xu, and iv Mr. Arnau Tibau Puig, who helped my research in many ways. They always reminded me how similar statistics problems are approached from engineering perspectives — different disciplines, distinct applications, but same magic. I am grateful to Ms. Julia Eussen, Ms. Denise Taylor-Moon, and Ms. Michelle Curry in the Bioinformatics Program; Ms. Lynn McCain in the Department of Pathology; Ms. Michele Feldkamp in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Their wonderful assistance have protected me from things that would have taken lot of time away from my research. I especially want to thank Ms. Linda Kents in the UM International Center for her extraordinary support and advices on critical international student issues. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iii LIST OF FIGURES :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: x LIST OF TABLES ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: xiii ABSTRACT ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: xiv CHAPTER I. Introduction ................................1 1.1 Research Overview........................1 1.2 Outline of Dissertation.......................4 1.3 Contributions of Dissertation...................5 1.4 List of Relevant Publications and Softwares...........8 II. Temporal Dynamics of Host Molecular Responses Differentiate Symp- tomatic and Asymptomatic Influenza A Infection ........... 10 2.1 Introduction............................ 10 2.2 Results............................... 12 2.2.1 Temporal gene expression profiling of host transcrip- tional response..................... 12 2.2.2 Screening for genes with different temporal profiles between asymptomatic and symptomatic hosts.... 12 2.2.3 Co-clustering differentially expressed genes based on temporal expression dynamics............. 13 2.2.4 Intense activation of TLR and non-TLR mediated sig- naling in symptomatic subjects............. 15 2.2.5 A non-passive asymptomatic state is characterized by down-regulated expression of the NLRP3 inflamma- some, CASP5 and the IL1B pathway......... 17 vi 2.2.6 Distinct temporal kinetics of JAK-STAT pathway and SOCS family genes reveals a potential method of viral control in asymptomatic hosts............. 19 2.2.7 Ribosomal protein synthesis is enhanced in asymptomatic subjects as compared to symptomatic subjects..... 21 2.2.8 Unsupervised detection of disease signature with Bayesian Liner Unmixing (BLU)................. 22 2.2.9 Early and late phase disease stratification using a logis- tic boosting model................... 23 2.3 Discussion............................. 24 2.4 Materials and Methods...................... 28 2.5 Acknowledgements........................ 33 2.6 Supplementary Materials..................... 33 2.7 Supplementary Discussion..................... 46 III. Towards Early Detection: Temporal Spectrum of Host Response in Symptomatic Respiratory Viral Infection ................ 79 3.1 Introduction............................ 79 3.2 Results............................... 81 3.2.1 Similarity clustering: analysis of differential expres- sion for temporal profiling............... 81 3.2.2 Discriminatory clustering: Analysis of differential ex- pression for disease state prediction.......... 91 3.3 Discussion............................. 97 3.4 Materials and Methods...................... 102 IV. Identification of Hoxa9 and Meis1 Regulatory Functions ....... 129 4.1 Introduction............................ 129 4.2 Results............................... 131 4.2.1 High confidence Hoxa9/Meis1 (H/M) binding sites were determined with ChIP-seq analysis........... 131 4.2.2 Genome-wide analysis showed dominant distal bind- ing of Hoxa9 and Meis1................ 132 4.2.3 Hoxa9 and Mesi1 selectively bind to DNA sequences that are highly evolutionarily conserved........ 133 4.2.4 H/M peaks show high potential of regulatory functions 133 4.2.5 H/M peaks show epigenetic signatures that are charac- teristic of enhancers.................. 134 4.2.6 Temporal gene expression reveals Hoxa9 regulation on genes mediating proliferation, inflammation and differ- entiation........................ 135 vii 4.2.7 De novo motif discovery suggests binding of H/M col- laborators........................ 137 4.2.8 Motif enrichment analysis (MEA) revealed tiered or- ganization of transcriptional control.......... 139 4.2.9 Epigenetic state at H/M peaks are correlated with spe- cific motif configuration................ 141 4.3 Discussion............................. 142 4.4 Materials and Methods...................... 145 4.4.1 Statistical Analysis..................
Recommended publications
  • Mouse Germ Line Mutations Due to Retrotransposon Insertions Liane Gagnier1, Victoria P
    Gagnier et al. Mobile DNA (2019) 10:15 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-019-0157-4 REVIEW Open Access Mouse germ line mutations due to retrotransposon insertions Liane Gagnier1, Victoria P. Belancio2 and Dixie L. Mager1* Abstract Transposable element (TE) insertions are responsible for a significant fraction of spontaneous germ line mutations reported in inbred mouse strains. This major contribution of TEs to the mutational landscape in mouse contrasts with the situation in human, where their relative contribution as germ line insertional mutagens is much lower. In this focussed review, we provide comprehensive lists of TE-induced mouse mutations, discuss the different TE types involved in these insertional mutations and elaborate on particularly interesting cases. We also discuss differences and similarities between the mutational role of TEs in mice and humans. Keywords: Endogenous retroviruses, Long terminal repeats, Long interspersed elements, Short interspersed elements, Germ line mutation, Inbred mice, Insertional mutagenesis, Transcriptional interference Background promoter and polyadenylation motifs and often a splice The mouse and human genomes harbor similar types of donor site [10, 11]. Sequences of full-length ERVs can TEs that have been discussed in many reviews, to which encode gag, pol and sometimes env, although groups of we refer the reader for more in depth and general infor- LTR retrotransposons with little or no retroviral hom- mation [1–9]. In general, both human and mouse con- ology also exist [6–9]. While not the subject of this re- tain ancient families of DNA transposons, none view, ERV LTRs can often act as cellular enhancers or currently active, which comprise 1–3% of these genomes promoters, creating chimeric transcripts with genes, and as well as many families or groups of retrotransposons, have been implicated in other regulatory functions [11– which have caused all the TE insertional mutations in 13].
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation of Tic10, a Novel Antitumor Agent
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Efficacy and Mechanisticv E aluation of Tic10, A Novel Antitumor Agent Joshua Edward Allen University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Oncology Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Joshua Edward, "Efficacy and Mechanisticv E aluation of Tic10, A Novel Antitumor Agent" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 488. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/488 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/488 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Efficacy and Mechanisticv E aluation of Tic10, A Novel Antitumor Agent Abstract TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL; Apo2L) is an endogenous protein that selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells and is a critical effector in the immune surveillance of cancer. Recombinant TRAIL and TRAIL-agonist antibodies are in clinical trials for the treatment of solid malignancies due to the cancer-specific cytotoxicity of TRAIL. Recombinant TRAIL has a short serum half-life and both recombinant TRAIL and TRAIL receptor agonist antibodies have a limited capacity to perfuse to tissue compartments such as the brain, limiting their efficacy in certain malignancies. To overcome such limitations, we searched for small molecules capable of inducing the TRAIL gene using a high throughput luciferase reporter gene assay. We selected TRAIL-inducing compound 10 (TIC10) for further study based on its induction of TRAIL at the cell surface and its promising therapeutic index. TIC10 is a potent, stable, and orally active antitumor agent that crosses the blood-brain barrier and transcriptionally induces TRAIL and TRAIL-mediated cell death in a p53-independent manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms Involved Involved in the Interaction Effects of HCV and Ethanol on Liver Cirrhosis
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Molecular Mechanisms Involved Involved in the Interaction Effects of HCV and Ethanol on Liver Cirrhosis Ryan Fassnacht Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Physiology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2246 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ryan C. Fassnacht 2010 All Rights Reserved Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the Interaction Effects of HCV and Ethanol on Liver Cirrhosis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Virginia Commonwealth University. by Ryan Christopher Fassnacht, B.S. Hampden Sydney University, 2005 M.S. Virginia Commonwealth University, 2010 Director: Valeria Mas, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Surgery and Pathology Division of Transplant Department of Surgery Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia July 9, 2010 Acknowledgement The Author wishes to thank his family and close friends for their support. He would also like to thank the members of the molecular transplant team for their help and advice. This project would not have been possible with out the help of Dr. Valeria Mas and her endearing
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1 the Four Gene Sets Derived from Gene Expression Profiles of Escs and Differentiated Cells
    Table S1 The four gene sets derived from gene expression profiles of ESCs and differentiated cells Uniform High Uniform Low ES Up ES Down EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol 269261 Rpl12 11354 Abpa 68239 Krt42 15132 Hbb-bh1 67891 Rpl4 11537 Cfd 26380 Esrrb 15126 Hba-x 55949 Eef1b2 11698 Ambn 73703 Dppa2 15111 Hand2 18148 Npm1 11730 Ang3 67374 Jam2 65255 Asb4 67427 Rps20 11731 Ang2 22702 Zfp42 17292 Mesp1 15481 Hspa8 11807 Apoa2 58865 Tdh 19737 Rgs5 100041686 LOC100041686 11814 Apoc3 26388 Ifi202b 225518 Prdm6 11983 Atpif1 11945 Atp4b 11614 Nr0b1 20378 Frzb 19241 Tmsb4x 12007 Azgp1 76815 Calcoco2 12767 Cxcr4 20116 Rps8 12044 Bcl2a1a 219132 D14Ertd668e 103889 Hoxb2 20103 Rps5 12047 Bcl2a1d 381411 Gm1967 17701 Msx1 14694 Gnb2l1 12049 Bcl2l10 20899 Stra8 23796 Aplnr 19941 Rpl26 12096 Bglap1 78625 1700061G19Rik 12627 Cfc1 12070 Ngfrap1 12097 Bglap2 21816 Tgm1 12622 Cer1 19989 Rpl7 12267 C3ar1 67405 Nts 21385 Tbx2 19896 Rpl10a 12279 C9 435337 EG435337 56720 Tdo2 20044 Rps14 12391 Cav3 545913 Zscan4d 16869 Lhx1 19175 Psmb6 12409 Cbr2 244448 Triml1 22253 Unc5c 22627 Ywhae 12477 Ctla4 69134 2200001I15Rik 14174 Fgf3 19951 Rpl32 12523 Cd84 66065 Hsd17b14 16542 Kdr 66152 1110020P15Rik 12524 Cd86 81879 Tcfcp2l1 15122 Hba-a1 66489 Rpl35 12640 Cga 17907 Mylpf 15414 Hoxb6 15519 Hsp90aa1 12642 Ch25h 26424 Nr5a2 210530 Leprel1 66483 Rpl36al 12655 Chi3l3 83560 Tex14 12338 Capn6 27370 Rps26 12796 Camp 17450 Morc1 20671 Sox17 66576 Uqcrh 12869 Cox8b 79455 Pdcl2 20613 Snai1 22154 Tubb5 12959 Cryba4 231821 Centa1 17897
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Parsing of Driver Mutations in the Colorectal Cancer Genome Reveals Numerous Suppressors of Anchorage-Independent
    Supplementary information Functional parsing of driver mutations in the colorectal cancer genome reveals numerous suppressors of anchorage-independent growth Ugur Eskiocak1, Sang Bum Kim1, Peter Ly1, Andres I. Roig1, Sebastian Biglione1, Kakajan Komurov2, Crystal Cornelius1, Woodring E. Wright1, Michael A. White1, and Jerry W. Shay1. 1Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9039. 2Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054. Supplementary Figure S1. K-rasV12 expressing cells are resistant to p53 induced apoptosis. Whole-cell extracts from immortalized K-rasV12 or p53 down regulated HCECs were immunoblotted with p53 and its down-stream effectors after 10 Gy gamma-radiation. ! Supplementary Figure S2. Quantitative validation of selected shRNAs for their ability to enhance soft-agar growth of immortalized shTP53 expressing HCECs. Each bar represents 8 data points (quadruplicates from two separate experiments). Arrows denote shRNAs that failed to enhance anchorage-independent growth in a statistically significant manner. Enhancement for all other shRNAs were significant (two tailed Studentʼs t-test, compared to none, mean ± s.e.m., P<0.05)." ! Supplementary Figure S3. Ability of shRNAs to knockdown expression was demonstrated by A, immunoblotting for K-ras or B-E, Quantitative RT-PCR for ERICH1, PTPRU, SLC22A15 and SLC44A4 48 hours after transfection into 293FT cells. Two out of 23 tested shRNAs did not provide any knockdown. " ! Supplementary Figure S4. shRNAs against A, PTEN and B, NF1 do not enhance soft agar growth in HCECs without oncogenic manipulations (Student!s t-test, compared to none, mean ± s.e.m., ns= non-significant).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) STANDARD PATENT (11) Application No. AU 2010325179 B2 (19) AUSTRALIAN PATENT OFFICE
    (12) STANDARD PATENT (11) Application No. AU 2010325179 B2 (19) AUSTRALIAN PATENT OFFICE (54) Title Blood transcriptional signature of active versus latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (51) International Patent Classification(s) C12N 15/31 (2006.01) G01N 33/15 (2006.01) C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) C12R 1/32 (2006.01) (21) Application No: 2010325179 (22) Date of Filing: 2010.08.19 (87) WIPONo: WO11/066008 (30) Priority Data (31) Number (32) Date (33) Country 12/628,148 2009.11.30 US (43) Publication Date: 2011.06.03 (44) Accepted Journal Date: 2015.03.12 (71) Applicant(s) Medical Research Council;Baylor Research lnstitute;lmperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (72) Inventor(s) Banchereau, Jacques F.;Chaussabel, Damien;O'Garra, Anne;Berry, Matthew;Kon, Onn Min (74) Agent / Attorney Pizzeys, PO Box 291, WODEN, ACT, 2606 (56) Related Art WO 2004/001070 BERRY, M.P.R. et al., Thorax, 2008, Vol. 63 (Suppl VII), page A63 STERN, J.N. et al., Immunologic Research, 2009, Vol. 45, pages 1-12 MISTRY, R. et al., The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2007, Vol. 195, pages 357-365 (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2011/066008 A3 3 June 2011 (03.06.2011) PCT (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: CHALKER, Daniel J. et al.; Chalker Flores, C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) G01N33/15 (2006.01) LLP, 14951 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400, Dallas, TX C12N15/31 (2006.01) C12R 1/32 (2006.01) 75254 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Figures 1-14 and Supplementary References
    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Spatial Cross-Talk Between Oxidative Stress and DNA Replication in Human Fibroblasts Marko Radulovic,1,2 Noor O Baqader,1 Kai Stoeber,3† and Jasminka Godovac-Zimmermann1* 1Division of Medicine, University College London, Center for Nephrology, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. 2Insitute of Oncology and Radiology, Pasterova 14, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3Research Department of Pathology and UCL Cancer Institute, Rockefeller Building, University College London, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK †Present Address: Shionogi Europe, 33 Kingsway, Holborn, London WC2B 6UF, UK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Supplementary Figures 1-14 and Supplementary References. Figure S-1. Network and joint spatial razor plot for 18 enzymes of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate shunt. Figure S-2. Correlation of SILAC ratios between OXS and OAC for proteins assigned to the SAME class. Figure S-3. Overlap matrix (r = 1) for groups of CORUM complexes containing 19 proteins of the 49-set. Figure S-4. Joint spatial razor plots for the Nop56p complex and FIB-associated complex involved in ribosome biogenesis. Figure S-5. Analysis of the response of emerin nuclear envelope complexes to OXS and OAC. Figure S-6. Joint spatial razor plots for the CCT protein folding complex, ATP synthase and V-Type ATPase. Figure S-7. Joint spatial razor plots showing changes in subcellular abundance and compartmental distribution for proteins annotated by GO to nucleocytoplasmic transport (GO:0006913). Figure S-8. Joint spatial razor plots showing changes in subcellular abundance and compartmental distribution for proteins annotated to endocytosis (GO:0006897). Figure S-9. Joint spatial razor plots for 401-set proteins annotated by GO to small GTPase mediated signal transduction (GO:0007264) and/or GTPase activity (GO:0003924).
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations in Pi(3,5)P2 Signaling and Neurodegeneration in Mouse and Human
    MUTATIONS IN PI(3,5)P2 SIGNALING AND NEURODEGENERATION IN MOUSE AND HUMAN by Clement Y. Chow A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Human Genetics) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Miriam H. Meisler, Chair Professor Sally A. Camper Professor David Ginsburg Associate Professor David C. Kohrman Assistant Professor Geoffrey G. Murphy Clement Y. Chow 2008 To my wife, Candace For all her love and support ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my mentor, Miriam Meisler. She is the consummate scientist. Miriam is inquisitive and interested in a wide range of topics. This trait has taught me to always ask the right questions and be skeptical of conclusions that are not supported by data. Miriam’s unending desire to make each oral presentation perfect drove me to improve my own skills. I came to this lab without any public presentation skills, but I am now greatly improved in my presentation abilities, a skill crucial for a successful scientific career. Miriam is a perfectionist when it comes to writing and always encouraged me to do the same. I will continue to strive to perfect my writing abilities. I came to the lab wanting to positionally clone a mouse mutant. I told Miriam that I would stay in the lab if she allowed me to do so. She was supportive and excited from the beginning, allowing me to pursue a project with an unknown future. This allowed me to learn, first hand, many aspects of genetics that such a project provides.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Clinical Response to Treatment with a Soluble Tnf-Antagonist Or Tnf, Or a Tnf Receptor Agonist
    (19) TZZ _ __T (11) EP 2 192 197 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 02.06.2010 Bulletin 2010/22 C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 08170119.5 (22) Date of filing: 27.11.2008 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventor: The designation of the inventor has not AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR yet been filed HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR (74) Representative: Habets, Winand Designated Extension States: Life Science Patents AL BA MK RS PO Box 5096 6130 PB Sittard (NL) (71) Applicant: Vereniging voor Christelijk Hoger Onderwijs, Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek en Patiëntenzorg 1081 HV Amsterdam (NL) (54) Predicting clinical response to treatment with a soluble tnf-antagonist or tnf, or a tnf receptor agonist (57) The invention relates to methods for predicting a clinical response to a therapy with a soluble TNF antagonist, TNF or a TNF receptor agonist and a kit for use in said methods. EP 2 192 197 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 192 197 A1 Description [0001] The invention relates to methods for predicting a clinical response to a treatment with a soluble TNF antagonist, with TNF or a TNF receptor agonist using expression levels of genes of the Type I INF pathway and a kit for use in said 5 methods. In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for evaluating a pharmacological effect of a treatment with a soluble TNF antagonist, TNF or a TNF receptor agonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for Hepg2 Experiments These Tables Show Details for All Gene Ontology Categories
    Supplementary Table 1: Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for HepG2 Experiments These tables show details for all Gene Ontology categories. Inferences for manual classification scheme shown at the bottom. Those categories used in Figure 1A are highlighted in bold. Standard Deviations are shown in parentheses. P-values less than 1E-20 are indicated with a "0". Rate r (hour^-1) Half-life < 2hr. Decay % GO Number Category Name Probe Sets Group Non-Group Distribution p-value In-Group Non-Group Representation p-value GO:0006350 transcription 1523 0.221 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.1 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006351 transcription, DNA-dependent 1498 0.220 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.0 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006355 regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent 1163 0.230 (0.011) 0.128 (0.002) FASTER 5.00E-21 14.2 (0.5) 4.6 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006366 transcription from Pol II promoter 845 0.225 (0.012) 0.130 (0.002) FASTER 1.88E-14 13.0 (0.5) 4.8 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006139 nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism3004 0.173 (0.006) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 1.28E-12 8.4 (0.2) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006357 regulation of transcription from Pol II promoter 487 0.231 (0.016) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 6.05E-10 13.5 (0.6) 4.9 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0008283 cell proliferation 625 0.189 (0.014) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 1.95E-05 10.1 (0.6) 5.0 (0.1) OVER 1.50E-20 GO:0006513 monoubiquitination 36 0.305 (0.049) 0.134 (0.002) FASTER 2.69E-04 25.4 (4.4) 5.1 (0.1) OVER 2.04E-06 GO:0007050 cell cycle arrest 57 0.311 (0.054) 0.133 (0.002)
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development
    Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Ganesh, Vijay S. 2012. Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9773743 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Copyright © 2012 by Vijay S. Ganesh All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Christopher A. Walsh Author: Vijay S. Ganesh Identification and Characterization of Genes Essential for Human Brain Development Abstract The human brain is a network of ninety billion neurons that allows for many of the behavioral adaptations considered unique to our species. One-fifth of these neurons are layered in an epithelial sheet known as the cerebral cortex, which is exquisitely folded into convolutions called gyri. Defects in neuronal number clinically present with microcephaly (Greek for “small head”), and in inherited cases these defects can be linked to mutations that identify genes essential for neural progenitor proliferation. Most microcephaly genes are characterized to play a role in the centrosome, however rarer presentations of microcephaly have identified different mechanisms. Charged multivesicular body protein/Chromatin modifying protein 1A (CHMP1A) is a member of the ESCRT-III endosomal sorting complex, but is also suggested to localize to the nuclear matrix and regulate chromatin.
    [Show full text]