DOCSLIB.ORG

The Seleucid Dynasty, Rulers in Asia Minor (305–63 BC) the ATTALIDS, RULERS of PERGAMON 283–129 BC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Seleucid Dynasty, Rulers in Asia Minor (305–63 BC) the ATTALIDS, RULERS of PERGAMON 283–129 BC This abridged list of rulers for the ancient Greek world is primarily for the rulers of the LIST OF GREEK / HELLENISTIC RULERS Hellenistic age (323–31 BC), after the time of Alexander the Great. In the preceding centuries, the dominant geopolitical unit was the polis or city-state. A variety of entities Rulers of Macedonia (496 BC – 168 BC) ruled Greek city-states, including kings, ― Alexander I 496–454 BC ― Philip II 360/59–336 BC oligarchies, tyrants, and, as in the case of ― Perdikkas II 454–413 BC ― Alexander III (the Great) (336–323 BC) Athens, a democracy. ― Archelaos I 413–399 BC ― Philip III Arrhidaios (323–317 BC) ― Aeropos II 398–395 BC ― Alexander IV 323–310 BC ― Amyntas II 395–394 BC ― Olympias 317–316 BC ― Amyntas III 393–370 BC ― Cassander 315–297 BC ― Perdiccas III 365–359 BC ― Philip IV 297 BC The Ptolemaic Dynasty of Egypt – 306 BC – 30BC ― Ptolemy I Soter ("Savior"; governor from 323) 306–282 BC) ― Cleopatra III (140–101 BC) ― Ptolemy II Philadelphos ("Sister-friend") (284–246 BC) ― Ptolemy X Alexander I (107–88 BC) ― Ptolemy III Euergetes ("Benefactor") (246–222 BC) ― Berenike III (100–80 BC) ― Ptolemy IV Philopator ("Father-friend") 222–204 BC) ― Ptolemy XI Alexander II (80 BC) ― Ptolemy V Epiphanes ("[God] Manifest") 210–180 BC ― Ptolemy XII Neos Dionysos Auletes ("the Piper") ― Cleopatra I (180–177 BC) (80–58, 55–51 BC) ― Ptolemy VI Philometor ("Mother-friend") 180–164, 163–145 BC ― Cleopatra V (80–69 BC) ― Cleopatra II 170–115 BC ― Berenike IV and Cleopatra VI (58–55 BC) ― Ptolemy VIII Euergetes II Physkon ("Potbelly") 170–163, 145–116 BC ― Ptolemy XIII (51–47 BC) ― Ptolemy VII Neos Philopator (with Ptolemy VI) 145–144 BC ― Cleopatra VII (51–30 BC) ― Ptolemy IX Soter II Lathyros ("the Bean") (116–107, 88–81 BC) ― Ptolemy XIV ( 47–44 BC) ― Caesarion (Ptolemy XV) (44–30 BC) The Seleucid Dynasty, Rulers in Asia Minor (305–63 BC) THE ATTALIDS, RULERS OF PERGAMON 283–129 BC ― Seleukos I Nikator ("Victor"; ruler from 312) (305–281 BC ― Philetairos (not king) 283–263 BC ― with Antichos I Soter 294 or 293–281 ― Eumenes I (not formally king) 263–241 BC ― Antiochos I Soter 281–261 BC ― Attalos I Soter 241–197 BC ― Antiochos II Theos ("the God") 261–246 BC ― Eumenes II Soter 197–159/8 BC ― Seleukos II Kallinikos ("the Glorious Victor") 246–226/5 BC ― Attalos II 159/8–139/8 BC ― Attalos III 139/8–133 BC ― Seleukos III 226/5–223 BC ― Aristonikos ("Eumenes III") 133–129 BC ― Antiochos III Megas ("the Great") 223–187 BC ― Seleukos IV Philopator 187–175 BC RULERS OF PONTUS ca. 280–63 BC ― Antiochos IV Epiphanes 175–164 BC ― Antiochos V Eupator ("of the Good Father") 164–162 BC ― Mithridates I ca. 280–ca. 266 BC ― Ariobarzanes ca. 266–ca. 255 BC ― Demetrios I Soter 162–150 BC ― Mithridates II ca. 255–ca. 220 BC ― Alexander Balas (Epiphanes) 150–145 BC ― Mithridates III ca. 220–ca. 185 BC ― Demetrios II Nikator 145–140, 129–126/5 BC ― Pharnaces I ca. 185–ca. 170 BC ― Antiochos VI Epiphanes 145–142 BC ― Mithridates IV Philopator ca. 170–ca. 150 BC ― Diodotos "Triophon," pretender 142–139/8 BC ― Mithridates V Euergetes ca. 150–120 BC ― Mithridates VI Eupator, "the Great" ca. 120–63 BC ― Antiochos VII Sidetes 139/8–129 BC ― ― Kleopatra Thea ("Goddess") 126/5–123 BC RULERS OF BAKTRIA 256–55 BC ― Antiochos VIII Grypos 126/5–96 BC ― Seleukos V 126 BC ― Diodotos I 256–248 BC ― Antiochos IX Philopator "of Kyzikos" 114/3–95 BC ― Diodotos II 248–235 BC ― Euthydemos I ca. 235–ca. 200 BC ― Seleukos VI 95 BC ― Euthydemos II ca. 200–ca. 190 BC ― Antiochos X Eusebes ("the Pious") Philopator 95 BC ― Demetrios I ca. 200–ca. 185 BC ― Demetrios III Philopator Soter (at Damascus) 95–88 BC ― Antimachos I ca. 195–ca. 185 BC ― Antiochos XI Epiphanes Philadelphos (in Cilicia) 95 BC ― Pantaleon ca. 185–ca. 180 BC ― Philip I (in Cilicia) 95–84/3 BC ― Demetrios II ca. 185–ca. 175 BC ― Agathokles ca. 180–ca. 165 BC ― Antiochos XII Dionysos (at Damascus) 87 BC ― Eukratides I (usurper?) ca. 171–ca. 155 BC ― Philip II 84/3 BC ― Agathokleia and Menandros ca. 155–ca. 130 BC ― Antiochos XIII Philadelphos 69–63 BC ― Kalliope and Hermaios ca. 75–ca. 55 BC VERUSAURUS.COM .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Hasmonean” Family Tree
    THE “HASMONEAN” FAMILY TREE Hasmoneus │ Simeon │ John │ Mattathias ┌──────────────┬─────────────────────┼─────────────────┬─────────┐ John Simon Judas Maccabee Eleazar Jonathan Murdered: Murdered: KIA: KIA: Murdered: 160/159 BC 134 BC 160 BC 162 BC 143 BC ┌────────┬────┴────┐ Judas John Hyrcanus Murdered: Murdered: Died: 134 BC 135 BC 104 BC ├──────────────────────┬─────────────┐ Aristobulus ═ Salome Alexander Antigonus Alexander ═══════ Salome Alexander Declared Himself “King”: Murdered: Declared “King”: Declared “Regent”: 104 BC 103 BC 103 BC 76 BC Died: Died: 103 BC 76 BC ┌──────┴──────┐ Hyrcanus II Aristobulus II Declared High Priest: 76 BC 1 THE “HASMONEAN” DYNASTY OF SIMON THE HIGH PRIEST 142 BC Simon, the last of the sons of Mattathias, was declared High Priest & “Ethnarch” (ruler of one’s own ethnic group) of the Jews by Demetrius II, King of the Seleucid Empire. 138 BC After Demetrius II was captured by the Parthians, his brother, Antiochus VII, affirmed Simon’s High Priesthood & requested assistance in dealing with Trypho, a usurper of the Seleucid throne. “King Antiochus to Simon the high priest and ethnarch and to the nation of the Jews, greetings. “Whereas certain scoundrels have gained control of the kingdom of our ancestors, and I intend to lay claim to the kingdom so that I may restore it as it formerly was, and have recruited a host of mercenary troops and have equipped warships, and intend to make a landing in the country so that I may proceed against those who have destroyed our country and those who have devastated many cities in my kingdom, now therefore I confirm to you all the tax remissions that the kings before me have granted you, and a release from all the other payments from which they have released you.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics and Policy: Rome and Liguria, 200-172 B.C
    Politics and policy: Rome and Liguria, 200-172 B.C. Eric Brousseau, Department of History McGill University, Montreal June, 2010 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. ©Eric Brousseau 2010 i Abstract Stephen Dyson’s The Creation of the Roman Frontier employs various anthropological models to explain the development of Rome’s republican frontiers. His treatment of the Ligurian frontier in the second century BC posits a Ligurian ‘policy’ crafted largely by the Senate and Roman ‘frontier tacticians’ (i.e. consuls). Dyson consciously avoids incorporating the pressures of domestic politics and the dynamics of aristocratic competition. But his insistence that these factors obscure policy continuities is incorrect. Politics determined policy. This thesis deals with the Ligurian frontier from 200 to 172 BC, years in which Roman involvement in the region was most intense. It shows that individual magistrates controlled policy to a much greater extent than Dyson and other scholars have allowed. The interplay between the competing forces of aristocratic competition and Senatorial consensus best explains the continuities and shifts in regional policy. Abstrait The Creation of the Roman Frontier, l’œuvre de Stephen Dyson, utilise plusieurs modèles anthropologiques pour illuminer le développement de la frontière républicaine. Son traitement de la frontière Ligurienne durant la deuxième siècle avant J.-C. postule une ‘politique’ envers les Liguriennes déterminer par le Sénat et les ‘tacticiens de la frontière romain’ (les consuls). Dyson fais exprès de ne pas tenir compte des forces de la politique domestique et la compétition aristocratique. Mais son insistance que ces forces cachent les continuités de la politique Ligurienne est incorrecte.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Echoes of the Salpinx: the Trumpet in Ancient Greek Culture
    Title Page Echoes of the salpinx: the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Carolyn Susan Bowyer. Royal Holloway, University of London. MPhil. 1 Declaration of Authorship I Carolyn Susan Bowyer hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Abstract The trumpet from the 5th century BC in ancient Greece, the salpinx, has been largely ignored in modern scholarship. My thesis begins with the origins and physical characteristics of the Greek trumpet, comparing trumpets from other ancient cultures. I then analyse the sounds made by the trumpet, and the emotions caused by these sounds, noting the growing sophistication of the language used by Greek authors. In particular, I highlight its distinctively Greek association with the human voice. I discuss the range of signals and instructions given by the trumpet on the battlefield, demonstrating a developing technical vocabulary in Greek historiography. In my final chapter, I examine the role of the trumpet in peacetime, playing its part in athletic competitions, sacrifice, ceremonies, entertainment and ritual. The thesis re-assesses and illustrates the significant and varied roles played by the trumpet in Greek culture. 3 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture Title page page 1 Declaration of Authorship page 2 Abstract page 3 Table of Contents pages
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • 32Nd Sunday in Ordinary Time - C
    32nd Sunday in Ordinary Time - C Note: Where a Scripture text is underlined in the body of this discussion, it is recommended that the reader look up and read that passage. 1st Reading - 2 Maccabees 7:1-2, 9-14 The title of 1 and 2 Maccabees is taken from the surname of Judas Maccabeus (1 Maccabees 2:4), the hero of the war of Jewish independence against Syria. The two books have separate authors. The first book is thought to have originally been written in Hebrew, although only a Greek translation survives, by a Palestinian Jew around 100 B.C. The second book is believed to have been composed in Greek by an Alexandrian Pharisee about 124 B.C. So, in fact, the second book was written before the first. Both books encompass a similar period in Jewish history, the first book covering 175 to 135 B.C., and the second covering 175 to 161 B.C. After the death of Alexander the Great in 323 B.C., Egypt and Syria contended over the possession of Palestine. The kings of Egypt, known as the Ptolemies, retained the overlordship over the Jews for more than 100 years. They treated the Jews mildly and permitted them to live undisturbed according to the laws of Moses. Still, Greek habits and ideas were widely adopted in Palestine, Greek culture (Hellenism) casting its spell especially over the higher classes. In 198 B.C., Antiochus II, Seleucid king of Syria, conquered Palestine and incorporated it with his own kingdom. The conqueror himself did not interfere with the religious life of the Jews, but his son and successor, Antiochus IV (Epiphanes), who ruled from 175 to 164 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Republican Army
    PART ONE THE IMPACT OF THE ROMAN REPUBLICAN ARMY Luuk De Ligt - 9789047430391 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 03:05:09AM via free access ROMAN MANPOWER RESOURCES AND THE PROLETARIANIZATION OF THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE SECOND CENTURY BC Luuk De Ligt Demographic developments In his account of the run-up to the passing of the lex Sempronia agraria of 133 bc Appian repeatedly underlines the military and demographic rationale of the Gracchan land reforms. In chapter 8, for instance, he describes Tiberius Gracchus as making a powerful speech in which the people of Italy (Italiotai) were characterized as excellent ghters but also as declining into poverty and depopulation. Similarly, Tiberius Gracchus is said to have defended his proposal by rhetorically asking whether a citizen was not always a better man than a slave, and a soldier more useful than a non-soldier. The same demographic and military theme is found also in Appian’s description of the undoing of the Gracchan reform programme, as a result of which ‘the numbers of both citizens and soldiers diminished still more’.1 At rst sight the census gures for the period 163–130 bc seem to tell a similar story: whereas the censors of 164/3 bc were able to reg- ister some 337,000 adult male citizens, the census gure for 130 bc is only 319,000. Although a decrease of less than 20,000 in more than three decades may not seem huge, the general trend for these years is in sharp contrast to the steep increase indicated by the census gures for the rst 35 years of the second century bc.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Picture of the Day” for April 28, 1999
    Physics - From Stargazers to Starships David P. Stern Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) www.ck12.org AUTHOR David P. Stern To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other interactive content, visit www.ck12.org EDITOR Alex Zaliznyak CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the FlexBook®, CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning, powered through the FlexBook Platform®. Copyright © 2014 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout: Daniel Lesson 7 Daniel 11:2-45 Covers the Period from the Persian Age to Seleucid Ruler Antiochus IV in Three Parts: 1
    Handout: Daniel Lesson 7 Daniel 11:2-45 covers the period from the Persian Age to Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV in three parts: 1. The Persian kings from Cambyses to Xerxes I: 529-465 BC (11:2) 2. Alexander the Great and the division of his empire: 336-323 BC (11:3-4). 3. Battles of the Greek Seleucids, the kings of the north and the Greek Ptolemies, the kings of the south (11:5-45). Part three concerning the history of the Greek Seleucids and Greek Ptolemies divides into six sections (11:5-45): 1. The reigns Ptolemy I Soter, 323-285 BC, and Seleucus I Nicator 312/11-280 BC (11:5) 2. The intrigues of Ptolemy II Philadelphus 285-246 BC and Antiochus II Theos 261-246 BC (11:6). 3. The revenge of Ptolemy III Evergetes 246-221 for the deaths of his sister Berenice and her baby by making war against the kingdom of Seleucus II Collinicus 246-226 BC (11:7-9). 4. The reign of Antiochus IV the Great 223-187 BC (11:10-19). 5. The reign of Seleucus IV Philopator 187-175 BC (11:20). 6. The cruel reign of Antiochus IV Epiphanes 175-164 BC, his persecution of the Jews, and his destruction (11:21-45). 2 Three more kings are going to rise in Persia; a fourth will come and be richer than all the others, and when, thanks to his wealth, he has grown powerful, he will make war on all the kingdoms of Greece. The four kings of Persia who came after Cyrus: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions by the Roman Republic in Illyria 230 – 167 BC
    Interventions by the Roman Republic in Illyria 230 – 167 BC Submitted by Jack James Willoughby, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics, September 2018. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… Page 1 of 181 Abstract This thesis aims to determine how and why Rome undertook a series of interventions in Illyria during the period of 230 – 167 BC. The thesis is based on a detailed examination and consideration of the ancient written sources and the subsequent historiography on the subject. The Roman interventions in Illyria during this period have traditionally been treated as a component of wider studies of Roman expansion, although Rome’s involvement in Illyria has recently been examined by Dzino in his 2010 work Illyricum in Roman Politics 229BC-AD68. This work examined the development and integration of Illyricum in Roman political discourse, in which the Roman interventions were a smaller component in the broader study. A study of the Roman interventions in Illyria during the period of 230 – 167 BC has never previously been treated on this scale, nor effectively with a synthesis of the various approaches and pieces of evidence that are now available.
    [Show full text]
  • Histroy of Astrology
    THE HISTORY OF ASTROLOGY THE HISTORY OF ASTROLOGY Astrology consists of a number of belief systems which hold that there is a relationship between visible astronomical phenomena and events in the human world. In the West, astrology most often consists of a system of horoscopes that claim to predict aspects of an individual's personality or life history based on the positions of the sun, moon, and planetary objects at the time of their birth. Many other cultures have attached importance to astronomical events, and the Indian, Chinese, and Mayan cultures developed elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from celestial observations. Source : Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia THE HISTORY OF ASTROLOGY Astrology’s origins in Indo-European cultures trace to the third millennium BCE, with roots in calendrical systems used to predict seasonal shifts and to interpret celestial cycles as signs of divine communications. Through most of its history it was considered a scholarly tradition. It was accepted in political and academic contexts, and its concepts were built into other studies, such as astronomy, alchemy, meteorology, and medicine. At the end of the 17th century, new scientific concepts in astronomy (such as heliocentrism) began to damage the credibility of astrology, which subsequently lost its academic and theoretical standing. Astrology saw a popular revival in the 19th and 20th centuries as part of a general revival of spiritualism and later New Age philosophy, and through the influence of mass media such as newspaper horoscopes. ETYMOLOGY The word astrology comes from the Latin astrologia, deriving from the Greek noun αστρολογία , which combines ἄἄἄστρο astro, 'star, celestial body' with λογία logia, 'study of, theory, discourse (about)'.
    [Show full text]