Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan's Post-Conflict Territories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan's Post-Conflict Territories ISSC INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES OF THE CAUCASUS _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Nazim MUZAFFARLI Eldar ISMAILOV BASIC PRINCIPLES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF AZERBAIJAN’S POST-CONFLICT TERRITORIES CA&CC Press® AB Stockholm – 2010 Nazim Muzaffarli Eldar Ismailov Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan’s Post-Conflict Territories Copyright © by CA&CC Press®, 2010 CA&CC Press® AB Hubertussigen 9 97455 Luleå Sweden All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, except for brief quotations in articles or reviews, without the written permission of the copyright owner. Any quotations must acknowledge the source. ISBN 978-91-86545-00-0 From the Authors Writing this book was not an easy task. We had to address a wide range and baffling variety of questions that needed answers and study a vast amount of relatively new information, while numerous problems called for detailed investigation and analysis. However, this did not dampen our enthusiasm; we have been working every day for the past two years, driven primarily by our sense of civic duty, as well as by the purely academic challenge it poses. We are fully aware of the fact that the government and the people of Azerbaijan, together with the leading states and international organiza- tions, will have to work hard to liberate the Armenia-occupied territories. Strictly speaking, their post-conflict status will begin only when the Armenian occupation ends. Thus, the term “post-conflict territories” as applied today is premature, but will be used throughout the text to describe these territories. We are convinced that sooner or later, these territories will be liberated, and that post-conflict rehabilitation should be planned well in advance. It was this conviction that inspired us as we worked on the conceptual foundations of post-conflict rehabilitation. The post-conflict rehabilitation conception on the whole, as well as its individual parts, gave rise to lengthy and ardent debates with our colleagues. Much of what was said was discussed at round tables, which greatly contributed to the formalization of the rehabilitation conception. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Doctor of Eco- nomics Shakhin Sadykhov, who heads the Economy and Financial and Crediting Policy Department of the Cabinet of Ministers of Azerbaijan, and PhD in architecture Elmir Abdullaev, who is a senior official at the Agency for Restoration and Reconstruction of the Territories of Azer- 3 baijan. During our discussions they showed a profound understanding of the problems and possible ways to address the specific tasks of rehabilitation of the liberated territories, the importance of which cannot be overestimated. We would also like to thank Mazakhir Sadykhov, Deputy Director of the Institute of Strategic Studies of the Caucasus, Nazim Ismailov, the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) General Director, PhD in economics Enver Abdullaev, Department Head at Azerenergy JSC, Vahid Husseynov, Senior Official of the Cabinet of Ministers of Azerbaijan, PhD in economics Fuad Murshudli, advisor to the President of the International Bank of Azerbaijan, and other colleagues who generously shared their suggestions and opinions. Ruzi Mammadov, who shouldered the burden of the auxiliary analytical efforts, deserves special mention and thanks. Prof. Frederick Starr, prominent American scholar, Chairman of the Central Asia – Caucasus Institute at Johns Hopkins University, has been involved in the effort from the very beginning and has agreed to write the Introduction. The fact that its first rendering was written before we completed the main part of the book inspired us immensely. We take pleasure in expressing our deep gratitude to Prof. Starr and are looking forward to working together on other joint projects. We were lucky to be able to refer to earlier projects by such as the Feasibility Study of the Program of Restoration and Reconstruction of the Territories of Azerbaijan Damaged by Foreign Aggression (1998) and the Program of Reconstruction of the Territories Liberated from Occupation – The Great Restoration (2005), both performed by Azeri and foreign experts. Our book is mainly devoted to the conceptual foundation of post- conflict rehabilitation and does not claim a full discussion of the problems related to post-liberation reconstruction and development of the still occupied territories of Azerbaijan. We have done our best to achieve a comprehensive discussion by linking together the elements of post-conflict rehabilitation in the spatial, functional (sectoral), financial, and resource respects. We are fully aware of the fact that the result is far from ideal and that our efforts must continue. 4 Contents ____________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS FROM THE AUTHORS 3 INTRODUCTION (By Prof. S. Frederick Starr) 9 1. BASIC PREMISES 21 2. METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES 29 2.1. Taking Account of International Experience 29 2.2. Reasonable Minimization of Costs 30 2.3. Restoring the Old and Building the New – The Two Approaches Combined 30 2.4. Flexible Territorial Planning 31 2.5. New Structure of the Resettlement System 32 2.6. Stage-by-Stage Progress 36 2.7. Cooperation between Independent and Government Experts 37 2.8. Cooperation with Foreign Experts 39 2.9. Permanent Improvement and Adjustment of the Program 39 2.10. Other Methodological Principles 40 3. PROGRAM TARGET 41 3.1. Spatial-Territorial Boundaries of the Program Target 41 3.1.1. Program Area in Terms of the Country’s Economic Zoning 42 5 REHABILITATION OF POST-CONFLICT TERRITORIES ____________________________________________________________________________________ 3.2. Program Area Prior to Occupation 43 3.2.1. The Agdam District 43 3.2.2. The Fizuli District 44 3.2.3. The Jabrayil District 46 3.2.4. The Zangilan District 47 3.2.5. The Qubadli District 48 3.2.6. The Lachin District 49 3.2.7. The Kalbajar District 51 3.2.8. Natural Resources of the Program Area 52 3.2.9. Protected Natural Zones 54 3.3. The Program Area Today: Classification of the Degrees of Destruction 56 4. THE GOVERNMENT AND SECURITY 61 4.1. Improving Administration 61 4.1.1. Establishing a State Structure to Control Post-Conflict Rehabilitation 61 4.1.2. Setting Up Special Units in the Functioning Government Units 64 4.1.3. Special Functions of the Local Administrations in the Post-Conflict Areas 65 4.2. Decontamination of the Post-Conflict Territories 67 4.3. Securing Borders 71 4.4. Internal Security 72 4.5. Regulatory-Legal Rehabilitation Underpinnings 73 5. RESTORATION OF THE VITAL SERVICE SYSTEMS 75 5.1. Repatriation 75 5.1.1. Organization of Repatriation 75 5.1.2. Repatriation Costs 80 6 Contents ____________________________________________________________________________________ 5.2. Restoration of Residential Properties 86 5.2.1. Cost of Residential Properties Restoration 96 5.3. Restoration of the Power Supply 98 5.4. Restoration of the Water Supply and Sewage Systems 105 5.5. Gas Supply 110 6. RESTORATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE 113 6.1. Restoration of the Civil Administration Infrastructure 113 6.2. Restoration of Transport Infrastructure 118 6.2.1. Roads 118 6.2.2. Railroads 124 6.2.3. Air Transport 127 6.3. Restoration of the Telecommunication Network 129 6.3.1. Telephone Service 130 6.3.2. Mobile Telephone Service 132 6.3.3. Television and Radio Broadcasting 133 6.3.4. Computerization 135 6.3.5. The Postal Service 137 6.4. Restoration of Social Facilities 140 6.4.1. Health Care 140 6.4.2. Education 154 6.4.3. Culture and Sport 162 6.4.4. Professional Training Centers 166 7. ECONOMIC REHABILITATION 170 7.1. Targets and Principles 170 7.2. The Branches of Comparative Advantages in the Post-Conflict Territories 172 7.3. State Support of the Projects of Comparative Advantages 179 7 REHABILITATION OF POST-CONFLICT TERRITORIES ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7.4. Employment 182 7.5. Land Privatization 183 7.6. Motivating Private Companies to Work in the Post-Conflict Areas 186 7.7. Attracting Foreign Private Companies to Post-Conflict Rehabilitation and Economic Revival 190 7.8. Resources for Economic Development 192 8. THE ROLE OF IFI AND FOREIGN DONOR ORGANIZATIONS IN POST-CONFLICT REHABILITATION 201 9. RISK MANAGEMENT 204 9.1. Types of Potential Risks 204 9.2. Neutralization or Reduction of Risks 205 9.2.1. External Risks 205 9.2.2. Internal Risks 208 CONCLUSION 212 8 Introduction ____________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION On Karabakh and the Occupied Territories In the year 1988 a war broke out between Azeris and Armenians over the province of Karabakh, which was part of Azerbaijan but claimed by Armenia. The Soviet Union still existed at the time and President Gorbachev, angry at Azerbaijan’s powerful and protective leader, Haidar Aliev, supported the Armenians with arms. By 1992, the USSR had collapsed but the conflict over Karabakh escalated to a new level. Now an independent Republic of Armenia sought to separate all of Karabakh from Azerbaijan by force of arms and to link it to Armenia. In a one-sided war Armenian troops not only seized Karabakh but large areas of adjacent provinces of Azerbaijan as well – in total a sixth of the land area of the new Republic of Azerbaijan. In the process, some ten thousand Azeris died fighting while thousands of
Recommended publications
  • War in Nagorno-Karabakh: Shadow of Big Ottoman Brother Covers Azerbaijan
    Video: War in Nagorno-Karabakh: Shadow of Big Ottoman Brother Covers Azerbaijan By South Front Region: Asia, Europe Global Research, November 06, 2020 Theme: Intelligence, Militarization and South Front 5 November 2020 WMD The Turkish military continues to demonstrate its non-involvement in the war with Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. On November 4, the heroic defense ministry of Turkey announced that Azerbaijani forces had shot down one more Armenian Su-25 warplane in the conflict zone. Thus, the claimed number of downed Armenian warplanes has reached seven. The only issue is that Azerbaijan itself did not claim such an incident, when the Turkish defense ministry made its statement. So, it seems that Ankara knows much more than do the Azerbaijani forces themselves, who are allegedly alone in their fight against the mighty Armenian aggressors. Meanwhile, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev undertook another Twitter advance announcing the capture of the villages of Mirak and Kavdar in the Jabrayil district, Mashadiismayilli and Shafibayli in the Zangilan district, and Basharat, Garakishilar and Garajalli in the Gubadli district. The Azerbaijani military also reported clashes in the district of Adhere. In the last 48 hours, according to Azerbaijan, Armenian forces suffered multiple casualties and lost over two dozen equipment pieces. Fortified positions and settlements controlled by Armenian forces in the central and northern parts of Nagorno-Karabakh are regularly being targeted with air and artillery strikes by Azerbaijani forces. The most intense strikes hit the areas of Shusha and the Lachin corridor. https://southfront.org/wp-content/uploads/video/05.11.20_IMR_Armenia.mp4 Armenian officials kept apace with their Azerbaijani counterparts and also made several victorious statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Генеральная Ассамблея Distr.: General 26 February 2021 Russian
    Организация Объединенных Наций A/HRC/46/G/10 Генеральная Ассамблея Distr.: General 26 February 2021 Russian Original: English Совет по правам человека Сорок шестая сессия 22 февраля — 19 марта 2021 года Пункт 4 повестки дня Ситуации в области прав человека, требующие внимания со стороны Совета Вербальная нота Постоянного представительства Армении при Отделении Организации Объединенных Наций в Женеве от 12 февраля 2021 года в адрес Управления Верховного комиссара Организации Объединенных Наций по правам человека Постоянное представительство Республики Армения при Отделении Организации Объединенных Наций и других международных организациях в Женеве настоящим препровождает замечания Министра иностранных дел Республики Армения Ары Айвазяна по поводу Нагорно-карабахской войны и ее последствий, высказанные на заседании Комиссии по внешним связям Национального собрания Республики Армения (см. приложение). Постоянное представительство Армении просит Управление Верховного комиссара Организации Объединенных Наций по правам человека распространить настоящую вербальную ноту и приложение к ней* в качестве документа Совета по правам человека по пункту 4 повестки дня. * Воспроизводится в полученном виде только на том языке, на котором оно было представлено. GE.21-02689 (R) 260221 260221 A/HRC/46/G/10 Annex to the note verbale dated 12 February 2021 from the Permanent Mission of Armenia to the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Remarks by Foreign Minister Ara Aivazian dated 14 January 2021 at the meeting of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the National Assembly Dear colleagues, Members of Parliament, I attach great importance to regular contacts with the Standing Committee on Foreign Relations of the National Assembly, particularly to analyze and discuss the situation unfolded in the aftermath of November 9, as well as to exchange views on the challenges and opportunities we face in this new reality.
    [Show full text]
  • A/74/881–S/2020/503 Генеральная Ассамблея Совет Безопасности
    Организация Объединенных Наций A/74/881–S/2020/503 Генеральная Ассамблея Distr.: General 5 June 2020 Совет Безопасности Russian Original: English Генеральная Ассамблея Совет Безопасности Cемьдесят четвертая сессия Cемьдесят пятый год Пункты 32, 37, 68, 70, 75 и 83 повестки дня Затянувшиеся конфликты на пространстве ГУАМ и их последствия для международного мира, безопасности и развития Положение на оккупированных территориях Азербайджана Ликвидация расизма, расовой дискриминации, ксенофобии и связанной с ними нетерпимости Поощрение и защита прав человека Ответственность государств за международно- противоправные деяния Верховенство права на национальном и международном уровнях Письмо Постоянного представителя Азербайджана при Организации Объединенных Наций от 4 июня 2020 года на имя Генерального секретаря Агрессия Армении против Азербайджана привела к захвату значительной части территории моей страны, включая Нагорно-Карабахский регион и семь прилегающих к нему районов, которые по-прежнему находятся под оккупацией Армении, что является вопиющим нарушением международного права и резо- люций 822 (1993), 853 (1993), 874 (1993) и 884 (1993) Совета Безопасности. Эта война унесла жизни десятков тысяч людей и повлекла за собой серьезные раз- рушения объектов гражданской инфраструктуры, имущества и источников средств к существованию в Азербайджане. Оккупированные территории были этнически зачищены от всех азербайджанцев: более 1 миллиона человек были вынуждены оставить свои дома и имущество на этих территориях. В настоящее время на этих территориях
    [Show full text]
  • Armenophobia in Azerbaijan
    Հարգելի՛ ընթերցող, Արցախի Երիտասարդ Գիտնականների և Մասնագետների Միավորման (ԱԵԳՄՄ) նախագիծ հանդիսացող Արցախի Էլեկտրոնային Գրադարանի կայքում տեղադրվում են Արցախի վերաբերյալ գիտավերլուծական, ճանաչողական և գեղարվեստական նյութեր` հայերեն, ռուսերեն և անգլերեն լեզուներով: Նյութերը կարող եք ներբեռնել ԱՆՎՃԱՐ: Էլեկտրոնային գրադարանի նյութերն այլ կայքերում տեղադրելու համար պետք է ստանալ ԱԵԳՄՄ-ի թույլտվությունը և նշել անհրաժեշտ տվյալները: Շնորհակալություն ենք հայտնում բոլոր հեղինակներին և հրատարակիչներին` աշխատանքների էլեկտրոնային տարբերակները կայքում տեղադրելու թույլտվության համար: Уважаемый читатель! На сайте Электронной библиотеки Арцаха, являющейся проектом Объединения Молодых Учёных и Специалистов Арцаха (ОМУСA), размещаются научно-аналитические, познавательные и художественные материалы об Арцахе на армянском, русском и английском языках. Материалы можете скачать БЕСПЛАТНО. Для того, чтобы размещать любой материал Электронной библиотеки на другом сайте, вы должны сначала получить разрешение ОМУСА и указать необходимые данные. Мы благодарим всех авторов и издателей за разрешение размещать электронные версии своих работ на этом сайте. Dear reader, The Union of Young Scientists and Specialists of Artsakh (UYSSA) presents its project - Artsakh E-Library website, where you can find and download for FREE scientific and research, cognitive and literary materials on Artsakh in Armenian, Russian and English languages. If re-using any material from our site you have first to get the UYSSA approval and specify the required data. We thank all the authors
    [Show full text]
  • Azərbaycan Arxeologiyasi
    Cild: 17 Say: 1 ISSN 2218 – 0346 2014 AZƏRBAYCAN ARXEOLOGİYASI Təsisçi Hamlet İsaxanlı BaşRedaktor Qüdrət İsmayılzadə Redaktor müavinləri Roza Arazova Tarix Dostiyev Bəhlul İbrahimli Məsul katib Sevda Hüseynova İşçi heyəti Xaqani Həbibov Ləman Babaşlı Redaksiya heyəti Yüksel Sayan (Türkiyə) Ayman Dosimbayeva (Qazaxıstan) İsmayıl Hacıyev (Azərbaycan) Maya Rəhimova (Azərbaycan) Bertyill Lyonnet (Fransa) Mehmet İşıqlı (Türkiyə) Rauf Munçayev (Rusiya) Lauren Listven (ABŞ) Mehmet Ösdoğan (Türkiyə) Andreas Şaxner (Almaniya) Vəli Baxşəliyev (Azərbaycan) Murtuzəli Hacıyev (Rusiya) Otar Caparidze (Gürcüstan) Volume: 17 Number: 1 ISSN 2218-0346 2014 AZERBAIJAN ARCHAEOLOGY Founder Hamlet Isaxanli Editor in Chief Qudrat Ismayilzadeh Editorial Assistants Roza Arazova Tarikh Dostiyev Bahlul Ibrahimli Deputy Editors Sevda Huseynova Staff members Khaqani Habibov Laman Babashlı Editorial Board Yuksel Sayan (Turkey) Ayman Dosimbayeva (Kazakhstan) İsmail Haciyev (Azerbaijan) Maya Rahimova (Azerbaijan) Bertille Lyonnet (France) Mehmet Ishikli (Turkey) Rauf Munchayev (Russia) Lauren Listvest (USA) Mehmet Ozdoghan (Turkey) Andreas Schachner (Germany) Vali Baxshaliyev (Azerbaijan) Murtuzali Hacıyev (Russia) Otar Japaridzeh (Georgian) © COPYRIGHT©1999 BY KHAZAR UNIVERSITY PRESS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AZ1096 Azərbaycan Respublikası Khazar University 41 Mehseti str., Bakı şəhəri, Məhsəti küçəsi, 41 Baku AZ1096 Republic of Xəzər Universitəsi Azerbaijan Üz qabığında: Azıx mağarası- Azərbaycan Cover page depicts: Azykh cave- Azerbaijan На обложке: Пещера Азых-Азербайджан Telefon: (99412) 4217927 (219) Faks: (99412) 4989379 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] website: http://www.khazar.org www.azerbaijanarcheology.com KHAZAR UNIVERSITY PRESS Alim yenə qucaq-qucaq yığır qədim saxsıları, Yer altdakı hər kərpicin üstündəki yazıları. Səməd Vurğun Picking up ceramics the scientist enjoys, Undergraund writings on bricks he knows Samad Vurgun Ученый роется в земле.... Он собирает черепки, осколки утвари простой.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan English
    AZERBAIJAN AM005-X 1 EBRD BOARD of GOVERNORS’ 30th Annual Meeting July 1, 2021 Written Statement by Mr. Mikayil Jabbarov, Minister of Economy, EBRD Governor for the Republic of Azerbaijan Your Excellency Mr. Chairman, Honourable Ms. President, Fellow Governors, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to sincerely thank the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) for the organization of the virtual 30th Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of the Bank. Let me take this opportunity to congratulate the EBRD on its 30th anniversary and call your attention to another anniversary, later this year. Republic of Azerbaijan marks 30 years since the country gained its independence after collapse of the Soviet Union. Our success in transition towards a market economy is also the EBRD’s success as we have strong and lasting partnership over 29 years. The EBRD has so far invested 3.1 billion EUR through 177 projects in the country. The value of the current portfolio of projects supported by the EBRD in Azerbaijan is more than 1.15 billion EUR. In Azerbaijan, the EBRD helps small and medium-sized businesses grow and succeed through its network of experts. It provides business advice to local small and medium-sized enterprises and has helped more than 1,000 firms to improve their performance and growth. Furthermore, we are currently exploring the prospects of cooperation for the development of trade, SMEs and SOEs. We believe that the Memorandum of Understanding on cooperation between Entrepreneurship Development Fund under the Ministry of Economy and EBRD soon to be signed attests to our mutual intent and commitment towards reinforcing our collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrines and Sovereigns: Life, Death, and Religion in Rural Azerbaijan
    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2011;53(3):654–681. 0010-4175/11 $15.00 # Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2011 doi:10.1017/S0010417511000284 Shrines and Sovereigns: Life, Death, and Religion in Rural Azerbaijan BRUCE GRANT New York University Shrines fill the Eurasian land mass. They can be found from Turkey in the west to China in the east, from the Arctic Circle in the north to Afghanistan in the south. Between town and country, they can consist of full-scale architectural complexes, or they may compose no more than an open field, a pile of stones, a tree, or a small mausoleum. They have been at the centers and periph- eries of almost every major religious tradition of the region: Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism. Yet in the formerly socialist world, these places of pilgrimage have something even more in common: they were often cast as the last bastions of religious observance when churches, mosques, temples, and synagogues were sent crashing to the ground in rapid succession across the twentieth century. In this essay I draw attention to a number of such shrines in the south Cau- casus republic of Azerbaijan. My goal is not to celebrate these settings for their promotion of an alternative route to religiosity under communist rule, as many have done before me, but rather to consider the ways in which the very popular attachments to shrines over so many centuries offer a window onto the plas- ticity and porosity of political, religious, and social boundaries in a world area that otherwise became better known over the twentieth century for its leaders of steel, curtains of iron, and seemingly immobilized citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIEVAL DAMASCUS Arabic Book Culture, Library Culture and Reading Culture Is Significantly Enriched.’ Li Guo, University of Notre Dame and MEDIEVAL
    PLURALITY KONRAD HIRSCHLER ‘This is a tour de force of ferocious codex dissection, relentless bibliographical probing and imaginative reconstructive storytelling. Our knowledge of medieval MEDIEVAL DAMASCUS DAMASCUS MEDIEVAL Arabic book culture, library culture and reading culture is significantly enriched.’ Li Guo, University of Notre Dame AND MEDIEVAL The first documented insight into the content and DIVERSITY structure of a large-scale medieval Arabic library The written text was a pervasive feature of cultural practices in the medieval Middle East. At the heart of book circulation stood libraries that experienced a rapid expansion from the DAMASCUS twelfth century onwards. While the existence of these libraries is well known, our knowledge of their content and structure has been very limited as hardly any medieval Arabic catalogues have been preserved. This book discusses the largest and earliest medieval library of the PLURALITY AND Middle East for which we have documentation – the Ashrafiya library in the very centre of IN AN Damascus – and edits its catalogue. The catalogue shows that even book collections attached to Sunni religious institutions could hold very diverse titles, including Muʿtazilite theology, DIVERSITY IN AN Shiʿite prayers, medical handbooks, manuals for traders, stories from the 1001 Nights and texts extolling wine consumption. ARABIC LIBRARY ARABIC LIBRARY Listing over two thousand books the Ashrafiya catalogue is essential reading for anybody interested in the cultural and intellectual history of Arabic societies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Azerbaijani-Armenian Escalation and Its Ramifications for the Middle East
    Position Paper The Azerbaijani-Armenian Escalation and Its Ramifications for the Middle East 05 Oct. 2020 Mohammad Al-Sayyad A researcher of ideological studies at Rasanah Contents Introduction ........................................................ 3 I-The Roots of the Conflict ................................. 4 II-Indicators and Reasons Behind the Latest Eruption of Fighting .......................................... 6 III-The Current Situation on the Ground ............ 9 IV.Regional and International Positions on the Renewed Dispute ............................................. 11 V.The Dangers and the Ramifications of the Conflict at the Regional and International Levels ............................................................... 21 VI.Future Scenarios ......................................... 23 Introduction The Azerbaijani-Armenian crisis witnessed a new escala- tion. Since 1990, it has raged on to varying degrees. On the morning of Saturday, September 27, 2020, Azerbaijan and Armenia announced the resumption of fighting. The two sides blamed one another for triggering the fresh round of fighting. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that Azerbaijan had launched a mis- sile and ground attack on the Nagorno-Karabakh region, an Armenian-majority region which declared its indepen- dence from Azerbaijan in 1992. Meanwhile, the Azerbaija- ni president asserted that Armenia had mounted an attack on Azerbaijani regions located along the line of contact be- tween the two countries, which was demarcated after the end of the major war between the two countries in 1994 that left more than 30,000 people dead and led Armenia to occupy almost 20 percent of Azerbaijani territories. This report intends to offer a realistic portrayal of the scope of the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict, evaluating the extent of its impact on the Middle East and the conflicts raging therein, and the potential opportunities it offers and challenges it poses to the region’s countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Aşıq Şəmşirin Anadan Olmasının 120 Illiyinə Həsr Olunur
    Aşıq Şəmşirin anadan olmasının 120 illiyinə həsr olunur. 2 AMEA FOLKLOR İNSTİTUTU “AŞIQ ŞƏMŞİR” MƏDƏNİYYƏT OCAĞI İCTIMAİ BİRLİYİ Aşıq Şəmşirin anadan olmasının 120 illiyinə həsr olunmuş AŞIQ SƏNƏTİNİN TARİXİ İNKİŞAF YOLLARI VƏ AŞIQ ŞƏMŞİR MƏRHƏLƏSİ mövzusunda Beynəlxalq Elmi Konfransın M A T E R İ A L L A R I BAKI – 2013 3 AMEA Folklor İnstitutu Elmi Şurasının qərarı ilə çap olunur. LAYİHƏ RƏHBƏRİ: Fil.ü.e.d. Muxtar KAZIMOĞLU (İMANOV) ELMİ REDAKTORLARI: Fil.ü.f.d. Adil CƏMİL Fil.ü.f.d. Səbinə İSAYEVA Fil.ü.f.d. Nail QURBANOV TƏRTİB EDƏNLƏRİ: Aynur QƏZƏNFƏRQIZI Əli ŞAMİL Aşıq Şəmşirin anadan olmasının 120 illiyinə həsr olunmuş “Aşıq sənətinin tarixi inkişaf yolları və Aşıq Şəmşir mərhə- ləsi” mövzusunda Beynəlxalq Elmi Konfransın materialları. Bakı, “Nurlan”, 2013, 408 səh. Kitabda 5 dekabr 2013-cü ildə Bakı şəhərində AMEA Folklor İnsti- tutu və “Aşıq Şəmşir” Mədəniyyət Ocağı İctimai Birliyinin təşkilatçılığı ilə keçirilən “Aşıq sənətinin tarixi inkişaf yolları və Aşıq Şəmşir mər- hələsi” mövzusunda Beynəlxalq Elmi Konfransın materialları toplan- mışdır. Topluya Azərbaycan alimləri ilə yanaşı, Türkiyədən, İrandan, Dağıstandan və Qırğızıstandan olan elm adamlarının da aşıq sənətinin tarixi keçmişi və bu günü ilə bağlı məqalələri daxil edilmişdir. folklorinstitutu.com M 4603000000 Qrifli nəşr N-098-2013 Folklor İnstitutu, 2013 4 KONFRANSIN TƏŞKİLAT KOMİTƏSİ SƏDARƏT Muxtar Kazımoğlu (İmanov) – filologiya üzrə elmlər doktoru, AMEA Folklor İnstitutunun direktoru. Qənbər Şəmşiroğlu – şair-publisist, ictimai xadim, “Aşıq Şəmşir” Mədəniyyət Ocağı İctimai Birliyinin sədri ELMİ HEYƏT Zəlimxan Yaqub – xalq şairi, Azərbaycan Aşıqlar Birli- yinin sədri Məhərrəm Qasımlı - fil.ü.e.d., professor, AMEA Ədə- biyyat İnstitutunda direktor müavini Qəzənfər Paşayev – fil. ü.
    [Show full text]
  • Coi Chronology
    COI CHRONOLOGY Country of Origin ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN Main subject The course of the Nagorno-Karabakh armed conflict and its impact on the civilian population Date of completion 10 November 2020 Disclaimer This chronology note has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this chronology has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in this chronology does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and asylum decision-making authorities. The chronology was finalised on 10 November 2020 and will be updated according to the development of the situation in the region. COI CHRONOLOGY Background Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous landlocked region within the borders of Azerbaijan1 and is mainly inhabited by ethnic Armenians.2 Recognized under international law as a part of Azerbaijan,
    [Show full text]
  • Key Considerations for Returns to Nagorno-Karabakh and the Adjacent Districts November 2020
    Key Considerations for Returns to Nagorno-Karabakh and the Adjacent Districts November 2020 With the latest developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) region and seven adjacent districts, the issue of return of persons originating from these areas (IDPs and refugees1), who were displaced in the past and most recent conflicts, has emerged as a new core issue that is also specifically mentioned, along with UNHCR’s supervisory role in this regard, in the statement on cessation of hostilities issued by the parties on 9 November 2020 under the auspices of the Russian Federation.2 Regarding specifically the return of IDPs from Azerbaijan, according to different sources, the Azeri authorities developed in 2005 broad elements of an IDP return concept, together with international agencies, which emphasizes the principle of voluntary returns in dignity and safety.3 No such plan exists for the return of refugees and persons in a refugee-like situation in Armenia, as the displacement of the Armenian population from NK only took place recently. It is also to note that the recent developments in NK do not open the possibility for the return of ethnic Armenian refugees and former refugees, who were displaced in the early 1990s from Baku, Sumgait and other parts of Azerbaijan, nor for the return of ethnic Azeris who left Armenia proper and settled in Azerbaijan and were since naturalized. The purpose of this note is to spell out the basic parameters to be considered under international law for these returns with a view to inform UNHCR and the UN’s possible support and assistance role.
    [Show full text]