Azerbaijan English

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Azerbaijan English AZERBAIJAN AM005-X 1 EBRD BOARD of GOVERNORS’ 30th Annual Meeting July 1, 2021 Written Statement by Mr. Mikayil Jabbarov, Minister of Economy, EBRD Governor for the Republic of Azerbaijan Your Excellency Mr. Chairman, Honourable Ms. President, Fellow Governors, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, I would like to sincerely thank the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) for the organization of the virtual 30th Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of the Bank. Let me take this opportunity to congratulate the EBRD on its 30th anniversary and call your attention to another anniversary, later this year. Republic of Azerbaijan marks 30 years since the country gained its independence after collapse of the Soviet Union. Our success in transition towards a market economy is also the EBRD’s success as we have strong and lasting partnership over 29 years. The EBRD has so far invested 3.1 billion EUR through 177 projects in the country. The value of the current portfolio of projects supported by the EBRD in Azerbaijan is more than 1.15 billion EUR. In Azerbaijan, the EBRD helps small and medium-sized businesses grow and succeed through its network of experts. It provides business advice to local small and medium-sized enterprises and has helped more than 1,000 firms to improve their performance and growth. Furthermore, we are currently exploring the prospects of cooperation for the development of trade, SMEs and SOEs. We believe that the Memorandum of Understanding on cooperation between Entrepreneurship Development Fund under the Ministry of Economy and EBRD soon to be signed attests to our mutual intent and commitment towards reinforcing our collaboration. Dear All, We live in challenging times. Over the last year and a half, we have witnessed how the pandemic has affected our societies, our economies. Introduction of vaccines is the seeming light at the end of the COVID-19 tunnel, but the extent of the crisis and its AM005-X 2 implications are likely to be long-term. In this regard, the key to economic recovery and “building back better” is multilateral cooperation and global solidarity. The Government of Azerbaijan promptly took coordinated and effective measures to mitigate the negative impact of COVID-19 and maintain socioeconomic stability. In comparison to the same period in 2020, during January-May of 2021, Real GDP grew by 0.8 percent and GDP per capita grew by 0.3 percent. The value added in the oil and gas sectors in January-May 2021 was decreased by 6.7 percent. In the non-oil and gas sector this number was increased by 4.5 percent. The Government issued the Action Plan to minimize the impact of the pandemic, to strengthen social protection of the population, to protect human health and vulnerable sections of society, to provide financial support to affected entrepreneurs and employees. The Government also established the Task Force, consisting of senior officials from the relevant state authorities to coordinate the measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus. In order to facilitate the rapid response during pandemic, one permanent and 13 modular hospitals were built within the short period of time, and local production of face masks, disposable protective clothing, disinfectants, sanitizers and etc. was launched swiftly. Furthermore, the dedicated Coronavirus Response Fund was set up in order to provide financial assistance to the country’s response. Around 12 million US dollars were allocated to the Fund from the President`s Contingency Fund. The Government launched relief package worth of over 2 billion USD, businesses affected by the pandemic benefited from significant tax incentives and tax holidays. Other business support measures included granting state loan guarantee to entrepreneurs operating in the sectors affected by the pandemic, subsidization of loan interest rates and ensuring better access to finance by allocating additional funding to the Entrepreneurship Development Fund. The support program is not only an anti-crisis measure, but also a program of economic expansion credit expansion, and stimulation of aggregate demand. This wide-range support package adopted by the Government serves sustainable development goals, including the preservation of social balance and economic development in the post-pandemic period Furthermore, we provided direct financial support to individual entrepreneurs, implemented temporary exemptions from taxes, insurance, and customs payments, partial payment of salaries to employees, financial support to essential passenger transportation system, state guarantees and subsidizing interest rates on bank loans to businesses, subsidized interest rate on existing bank loans without state guarantees, salary increase for the medical staff and state support measures and promotion of private investments in the areas identified as the main priorities of the AM005-X 3 state's economic policy in mid-term period. As a result of these measures, the number of daily cases has been decreased and the quarantine regime has been gradually softened. Azerbaijan has reaffirmed its global solidarity by making a voluntary financial contribution of 10 million USD to the World Health Organization, and has provided humanitarian assistance to more than 30 countries. Our country has started vaccination campaign since the beginning of this year. We have already used 2.25 million doses of vaccines, including over 1 million people (10.4% of population) fully vaccinated. 99.94% of those 2 million doses of vaccines are “Sinovac” and the rest are “AstraZeneca”, “Pfizer” and “Sputnik”. Vaccination for citizens over the age of 18 is on voluntary basis and vaccinated people are entitled to COVID-19 passports. Also, I would like to highlight invaluable support and assistance provided by many Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), including EBRD, in designing measures to cope with the immediate disruption of the coronavirus crisis. The EBRD continued to be a strong and reliable partner to the countries. The Bank helped its members not only to protect the economy, but promote further development through building back better, ensuring greener economies, improving the essential infrastructure, supporting small businesses and providing advisory services. It is worth mentioning that the Bank was the first international financial institution to approve the comprehensive series of response and recovery measures included in the Solidarity Package and now the Bank is involved in the preparation for the post-pandemic era. Azerbaijan has already prioritized its post-pandemic future. In the beginning of this year the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan approved the National Priorities for Socio- Economic Development of our country for the next decade. This document sets out 5 national priorities to be achieved in the next ten years. The mentioned below priorities are of utmost importance for achieving sustainable, resilient recovery and long-term growth after COVID-19 pandemic and they have mapped the country's development vector for the subsequent decade. The priorities are in line with the goals and priorities set in the EBRD’s “Strategic and Capital Framework 2021-2025”, which creates potential for new areas of cooperation between the EBRD and Azerbaijan. Those priorities are: 1. Steadily growing, competitive economy; 2. Dynamic, inclusive society based on social justice; 3. Areas of modern innovations and competitive human capital; 4. The great return to the territories liberated from occupation: As you know, last year Azerbaijan put an end to nearly 30-year- occupation of almost 20% of its territories by Armenia. We finally managed to sign an agreement which AM005-X 4 stipulates the unconditional withdrawal of Armenian troops from the occupied territories and return of all IDPs to the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan. Nevertheless revanchist rhetoric against Azerbaijan in Armenia is a matter of serious concern. Unfortunately, amid signing this agreement Armenia tried to violate the ceasefire several times. We have also spotted members of Armenian reconnaissance-sabotage group that infiltrated into Azerbaijan’s territories to plant mines. Azerbaijan has obtained maps showing locations of 97,000 mines in Agdam only. Many Azerbaijanis, including civilians and just recently two journalists have died as a result of mine explosions in the liberated areas. We also have to stress that “Protocol II” of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which is an annex to the Geneva Convention prohibits the use of landmines, booby traps and other explosive devices. Breaking these rules is considered a war crime under the Geneva Convention. Using mines to cause unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury is illegal; directing these weapons against civilians or civilian objects is also illegitimate as is using these weapons indiscriminately. At the critical juncture of new openings for entire region, it is of vital importance to finally realize that repeating the mistakes of the past has no chance to bring a different outcome. Building a peaceful and prosperous future is simply impossible at the expense of legitimate rights of others and attacking their borders either verbally or physically. Now, as a result of the liberation of the occupied territories and in line with new realities, we have to ensure a sustainable resettlement and reintegration of the region into the national economy for further development of the region to the level it had before the occupation . It will not be only the beginning of
Recommended publications
  • ECONOMY of AZERBAIJAN 25 Years of Independence
    ECONOMY OF AZERBAIJAN 25 Years of Independence Prof. Dr. Osman Nuri Aras Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elchin Suleymanov Qafqaz University, Baku, Azerbaijan Assoc. Prof. Dr. Karim Mammadov Western University, Baku, Azerbaijan DESIGN Sahib Kazimov PRINTING AND BINDERING “Sharg-Garb” Publishing House A§iq aiesgar kiig., No: 17, Xatai rayonu, Baki, Azarbaycan; Tel: (+99412) 374 83 43 ISBN: 978-9952*468-57-1 © Prof. Dr. Osman Nuri Aras. Baki, 2016 © Assoc. Prof. Dr. Elchin Suleymanov. Baki. 2016 © Assoc. Prof. Dr. Karim Mammadov. Baki. 2016 Foreword During every work, whether it is academic or professional, we interact, get assistance and are guided by certain group of people who value and assist us to achieve our targets. We are sure that the people who support us and provide valuable contribution to the English version of this book will not be limited in a short list, but we would like to mention, and in certain ways, express our acknowledgement to the people who enabled us to get on a track and deliver the book in a few months. Thanks to Turan Agayeva, Ulker Gurbaneliyeva, Khayala Mahmudiu and especially to Tural Hasanov for their help in preparing and delivering this book to your valuable consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT AZERBAIJAN The Establishment of the Republic of Azerbaijan 28 May 1918 The independence Day 18 October 1991 Joining to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 30 January 1992 Joining to the United Nations 2 March 1992 Joining to the Commonweaith of independent States 19 September 1995 Joining to the Council of Europe 17 January2001 Area (thousand km^) 86.6 Population, (thousand person) (According to the beginning of 2015) 9593.0 Density of population in Ikm^(person) 111 Capital Baku Official Language Azerbaijan Currency Manat The course of Manat to Dollar (07.02.2016) 0.6389 The Head of State President ___ ________________________ ____ ______ ' .L-L; r - j = r .
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: a Political and Economic Analysis
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Vol. 5, No. 1, 2015, pp.27-44 ISSN: 2146-4553 www.econjournals.com Turkey-Azerbaijan Energy Relations: A Political and Economic Analysis Cagla Gul YESEVI Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] Burcu Yavuz TIFTIKCIGIL Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Gedik University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: It is now widely recognized that Turkey-Azerbaijan relations have always been strong and described with the phrase "one nation with two states”. This paper is concerned with economic and political nature of Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Initially, the evolution of Turkish- Azerbaijani relations after the independence of Azerbaijan has been examined. This paper gives an overview of the impacts of Nagorno-Karabagh issue and efforts to normalize the relations between Turkey and Armenia on relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Energy has a special place in the relationship between the two countries. Azerbaijan’s economy, energy sectors of Azerbaijan and Turkey has been assessed. Moreover, this paper gives a comparative analysis on economic relationship between Turkey and Azerbaijan. This study finally discusses the main trends and contributions of energy projects on Turkey-Azerbaijan relations. Keywords: Turkey; Azerbaijan; Politics; Economy; Energy JEL Classifications: O57; Q41; Q43; Q48 1. Introduction Turkey has distanced itself from the Turkic people of Soviet Union, with whom it has ethnic and language affiliations, since its establishment. The primary aim was determined as the prevention of the spread of communism within the country and Turanist movements were not supported.
    [Show full text]
  • Yukarı Karabağ'da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer
    Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory in Nagorno-Karabakh after 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА ISBN: 978-625-7779-91-3 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА © 2021 CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI İLETİŞİM BAŞKANLIĞI YAYINLARI © 2021 PUBLICATIONS BY PRESIDENCY’S DIRECTORATE OF COMMUNICATIONS © 2021 ИЗДАНИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ КОММУНИКАЦИИ ПРИ АДМИНИСТРАЦИИ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА Yayıncı Sertifika No: 45482 | Publication Certificate No.: 45482 | Сертификат издателя № 45482 1. Baskı, İstanbul, 2021 | 1st Edition, Istanbul | 1 Издание, Стамбул İletişim | Contact | Контакты Kızılırmak Mahallesi Mevlana Bulv. No:144 Çukurambar Ankara/TÜRKİYE T +90 312 590 20 00 | [email protected] Baskı | Print | Печать Prestij Grafik Rek. ve Mat. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. T 0 212 489 40 63, İstanbul Matbaa Sertifika No: 45590 Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Yukarı Karabağ’da 44 Günde Gelen Zafer: TÜRKIYE-AZERBAYCAN KARDEŞLIĞININ NIŞANESI Victory In Nagorno-Karabakh After 44 Days: THE TOKEN OF THE TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN BROTHERHOOD Победа в Нагорном Карабахе за 44 дня: ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВО БРАТСТВА ТУРЦИИ И АЗЕРБАЙДЖАНА İÇİNDEKİLER CONTENTS СОДЕРЖАНИЕ 1. Önsöz Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 07 Preface Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 101 Предисловие Recep Tayyip Erdoğan 199 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Azerbaijani-Armenian Escalation and Its Ramifications for the Middle East
    Position Paper The Azerbaijani-Armenian Escalation and Its Ramifications for the Middle East 05 Oct. 2020 Mohammad Al-Sayyad A researcher of ideological studies at Rasanah Contents Introduction ........................................................ 3 I-The Roots of the Conflict ................................. 4 II-Indicators and Reasons Behind the Latest Eruption of Fighting .......................................... 6 III-The Current Situation on the Ground ............ 9 IV.Regional and International Positions on the Renewed Dispute ............................................. 11 V.The Dangers and the Ramifications of the Conflict at the Regional and International Levels ............................................................... 21 VI.Future Scenarios ......................................... 23 Introduction The Azerbaijani-Armenian crisis witnessed a new escala- tion. Since 1990, it has raged on to varying degrees. On the morning of Saturday, September 27, 2020, Azerbaijan and Armenia announced the resumption of fighting. The two sides blamed one another for triggering the fresh round of fighting. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that Azerbaijan had launched a mis- sile and ground attack on the Nagorno-Karabakh region, an Armenian-majority region which declared its indepen- dence from Azerbaijan in 1992. Meanwhile, the Azerbaija- ni president asserted that Armenia had mounted an attack on Azerbaijani regions located along the line of contact be- tween the two countries, which was demarcated after the end of the major war between the two countries in 1994 that left more than 30,000 people dead and led Armenia to occupy almost 20 percent of Azerbaijani territories. This report intends to offer a realistic portrayal of the scope of the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict, evaluating the extent of its impact on the Middle East and the conflicts raging therein, and the potential opportunities it offers and challenges it poses to the region’s countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – Azerbaijan
    Country profile – Azerbaijan Version 2008 Recommended citation: FAO. 2008. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Azerbaijan. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict on the Economic Growth of Transcaucasia
    ZN WSH Zarządzanie 2020 (4), s. 137-150 Studium przypadku Case study Data wplywu/Received: 15.06.2020 Data recenzji/Accepted: 14.07.2020/17.07.2020 Data publikacji/Published: 31.12.2020 Źródła finansowania publikacji: środki własne DOI: Authors› Contribution: Study Design (projekt badania) Data Collection (zbieranie danych) Statistical Analysis (analiza statystyczna) Data Interpretation (interpretacja danych) Manuscript Preparation (redagowanie opracowania) Literature Search (badania literaturowe) Farman Yusubau, Ph.D. A B C D E F Yanka Kupala state University of Grodno, Belarus ORCID 0000-0001-6165-6757 THE IMPACT OF THE ARMENIAN-AZERBAIJANI NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF TRANSCAUCASIA WPŁYW KONFLIKTU ARMEŃSKO- -AZERBERDŻAŃSKIEGO W GÓRSKIM KARABACHU NA WZROST GOSPODARCZY ZAKAUKAZIA Abstract: The article deals with the frozen conflict between two sovereign States in Trans- caucasia: Armenia and Azerbaijan, which can be undermined at any time due to unresolved issues, and destroy the economy not only in the region. The purpose of the article is to elimi- 138 Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas. Zarządzanie nate this conflict with possible instruments aimed at eternal peace and ensuring economic security in the region. During the research, the author used methods such as analysis, syn- thesis, comparison, grouping, etc. The history and causes of this conflict have been studied. In the result of the analysis, it is concluded that the influence of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, today, in frozen form, has a negative impact, primarily on Azerbaijan’s economy since occupied over 20 percent of its territory, and, as a result of oc- cupation, destroyed towns, the entire infrastructure, and there was more than one million Azerbaijanis refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights
    GRAND CHAMBER DECISION Application no. 40167/06 Minas SARGSYAN against Azerbaijan The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 14 December 2011 as a Grand Chamber composed of: Nicolas Bratza, President, Jean-Paul Costa, Christos Rozakis, Françoise Tulkens, Josep Casadevall, Nina Vajić, Corneliu Bîrsan, Peer Lorenzen, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Elisabet Fura, Alvina Gyulumyan, Khanlar Hajiyev, Egbert Myjer, Sverre Erik Jebens, Giorgio Malinverni, George Nicolaou, Luis López Guerra, judges, and Michael O’Boyle, Deputy Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 August 2006, Having regard to the decision of 11 March 2010 by which the Chamber of the First Section to which the case had originally been assigned relinquished its jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber (Article 30 of the Convention), 2 SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN DECISION Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having regard to the comments submitted by the Armenian Government, Having regard to the oral submissions of the parties and the third party at the hearing on 15 September 2010, Having deliberated on 15, 16 and 22 September 2010 and on 14 December 2011 decides, on the last-mentioned date as follows: THE FACTS 1. The applicant, Mr Minas Sargsyan, is an Armenian national who was born in 1929 and died in 2009. His widow, Lena Sargsyan, born in 1936 and their children, Vladimir, Tsovinar and Nina Sargsyan, born in 1957, 1959, and 1966 respectively, have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf. The applicant is represented before the Court by Ms N.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Azerbaijan (Textbook)
    DILGAM ISMAILOV HISTORY OF AZERBAIJAN (TEXTBOOK) Azerbaijan Architecture and Construction University Methodological Council of the meeting dated July 7, 2017, was published at the direction of № 6 BAKU - 2017 Dilgam Yunis Ismailov. History of Azerbaijan, AzMİU NPM, Baku, 2017, p.p.352 Referents: Anar Jamal Iskenderov Konul Ramiq Aliyeva All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means. Electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. In Azerbaijan University of Architecture and Construction, the book “History of Azerbaijan” is written on the basis of a syllabus covering all topics of the subject. Author paid special attention to the current events when analyzing the different periods of Azerbaijan. This book can be used by other high schools that also teach “History of Azerbaijan” in English to bachelor students, master students, teachers, as well as to the independent learners of our country’s history. 2 © Dilgam Ismailov, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword…………………………………….……… 9 I Theme. Introduction to the history of Azerbaijan 10 II Theme: The Primitive Society in Azerbaijan…. 18 1.The Initial Residential Dwellings……….............… 18 2.The Stone Age in Azerbaijan……………………… 19 3.The Copper, Bronze and Iron Ages in Azerbaijan… 23 4.The Collapse of the Primitive Communal System in Azerbaijan………………………………………….... 28 III Theme: The Ancient and Early States in Azer- baijan. The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms.. 30 1.The First Tribal Alliances and Initial Public Institutions in Azerbaijan……………………………. 30 2.The Kingdom of Manna…………………………… 34 3.The Atropatena and Albanian Kingdoms………….
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Frameworks: Geopolitical and Socio-Economic Considerations
    Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal, Volume 1 Issue 2, 2018 Azerbaijan frameworks: geopolitical and socio-economic considerations Nicoletta Varani Ph D, Full professor of Geography, Department of Education [DISFOR], University of Genoa, email: [email protected] Doi: 10.2478/gssfj-2018-0013 Abstract The contribution intends to present a framework as updated as possible on Azerbaijan, a country of which we are hearing more and more but not very well known and known to most, trying to provide an overview of what Azerbaijan is today, paying particular attention to the history of this interesting country in order to understand what it is today and even more what is the path taken for its future development. Therefore, some areas and aspects of the country have been identified, which will be, to follow, argued. Starting from the entirely geographical aspects to the more socio-cultural, then moving on to international relations and geopolitics and finally to the economic aspects. Keywords: Azerbaijan, geopolitics, tourism 1. Geo-social introduction Azerbaijan is the easternmost and largest (86,000 sq. km) country in the South Caucasus region; 800 km of coastline is on the Caspian Sea. More than 50% of the Azerbaijani territory is mountainous, and the morphological variety gives the country its own climatic, naturalistic and landscape peculiarities: nine of the eleven climate zones in Azerbaijan are located worldwide (Figure 1). In addition to this wealth of climate is a considerable wealth of minerals, represented by reserves of oil and natural gas. The socio-cultural aspects are defined in relation to the languages spoken on the territory: Azerbaijani (official language) 92.5%, Russian 1.4%, Armenian 1.4% and other 4.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Assessment of Economic & Export Diversification
    ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC AND EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION AZERBAIJAN ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC AND EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION AZERBAIJAN This report has been prepared in the frame of ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐďLJWƵďůŝĐƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ to Free Economy “Assessment of Economic ĂŶĚdžƉŽƌƚŝǀĞƌƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŝŶnjĞƌďĂŝũĂŶ ĂŶĚ<ĂnjĂŬŚƐƚĂŶ͟;Zt/ͿĂŶĚ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ/ŶŝƟĂƟǀĞWƵďůŝĐhŶŝŽŶ͞ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ŽĨĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚdžƉŽƌƚŝǀĞƌƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ KƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJŝŶnjĞƌďĂŝũĂŶ͟;K^/&Ϳ Authors: Kanan Aslanli Zohrab Ismayil Rovshan Aghayev njĞƌDĞŚƟLJĞǀ Edited: &dƌĂŶƐůĂƟŽŶ>>^ &ƵŶĚĞĚďLJZĞǀĞŶƵĞtĂƚĐŚ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ ΞWƵďůŝĐƐƐŽĐŝĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ to Free Economy, 2013 www.freeeconomy.az Cover photo belongs to www.bp.com CONTENTS Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................3 Summary .......................................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction (Key Concepts and Methodology) ................................................................10 2. Macroeconomic Environment ...............................................................................................13 řǯȱȱȱ¡ȱęȱ¢ ......................................................................22 řǯŗǯȱȱȱȱȱȱ¡ȱę ........................................22 řǯŘǯȱȱęȱȱȱ...................................................22 řǯřǯȱ ȱȱĜȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¡ȱę ..........................................................................................................27 řǯŚǯȱ ȱȱȱȱȱę ............................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and Its Alternatives
    Forced displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict: return and its alternatives August 2011 conciliation resources Place-names in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict are contested. Place-names within Nagorny Karabakh itself have been contested throughout the conflict. Place-names in the adjacent occupied territories have become increasingly contested over time in some, but not all (and not official), Armenian sources. Contributors have used their preferred terms without editorial restrictions. Variant spellings of the same name (e.g., Nagorny Karabakh vs Nagorno-Karabakh, Sumgait vs Sumqayit) have also been used in this publication according to authors’ preferences. Terminology used in the contributors’ biographies reflects their choices, not those of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. For the map at the end of the publication, Conciliation Resources has used the place-names current in 1988; where appropriate, alternative names are given in brackets in the text at first usage. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of Conciliation Resources or the European Union. Altered street sign in Shusha (known as Shushi to Armenians). Source: bbcrussian.com Contents Executive summary and introduction to the Karabakh Contact Group 5 The Contact Group papers 1 Return and its alternatives: international law, norms and practices, and dilemmas of ethnocratic power, implementation, justice and development 7 Gerard Toal 2 Return and its alternatives: perspectives
    [Show full text]
  • National Minorities in South Caucasus
    Dr. Ahmad Shahidov Azerbaijan Institute for Democracy and Human Rights (AIDHR) www.aidhr.org [email protected] +99450 372 87 30 NATIONAL MINORITIES IN SOUTH CAUCASUS Today, Azerbaijan is distinguished with ethnic diversity. Besides Azerbaijani Turks, Mountain Jews, Tats, Talysh, Kurds, Molokans, Ingiloys, Tsakhurs, Avars, Lezgins, Khynalygs, Buduqlus, Grysz and other ethnic groups live in its territory. Although the representatives of ethnic groups consider themselves as Azerbaijanis but each group has retained distinctive elements of their different culture. This culture is reflected in domestic life, crafts, in kitchen and various ceremonies. Despite the difficulties being experienced by Azerbaijan, due to the unresolved armed conflict that continues more than a decade with neighboring Armenia, which occupies 20 percent of the Azerbaijani territory and the presence of about one million refugees and forcibly displaced persons - victims of ethnic cleansing organized by the Armenian armed forces and terrorist groups, among whom in addition to Azerbaijanis there are persons belonging to various minorities (Kurds, Russians, Jews and others), as well as problems connected with transitional period, the Government of Azerbaijan continues to pursue a consistent policy towards protection of minorities rights. 1 National minorities constitute 9.4 % of the population of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Here is a structural composition of population, languages and places of compact living of persons belonging to national minorities of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Lezgins - 178 thousand, compactly live in the Northern regions of Azerbaijan. Language of communication is Lezgins, relating to the Daghestan branch of the Caucasian languages, as well as Azerbaijani and Russian languages. Russians - 141,7 thousand, compactly live in the industrial cities, as well as a number of rural regions.
    [Show full text]