Relations Phylogénétiques Chez Les Termites Du Genre Reticulitermes En Europe. Description D'une Nouvelle Espèce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Relations Phylogénétiques Chez Les Termites Du Genre Reticulitermes En Europe. Description D'une Nouvelle Espèce Relations phylog´en´etiqueschez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle esp`ece. Paolo Uva To cite this version: Paolo Uva. Relations phylog´en´etiqueschez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle esp`ece.. Ecologie, Environnement. Universit´eFran¸coisRabelais - Tours, 2002. Fran¸cais. <tel-00114554> HAL Id: tel-00114554 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00114554 Submitted on 17 Nov 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. UNIVERSITÉ FRANÇOIS RABELAIS TOURS École Doctorale : Santé, Sciences, Technologies Année Universitaire : 2001/2002 THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS Discipline : Sciences de la Vie présentée et soutenue publiquement par : Paolo UVA Le 8 novembre 2002 Relations phylogénétiques chez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle espèce Directeur de thèse : Dr. BAGNÈRES-URBANY Anne-Geneviève Jury : CARIOU Marie-Louise, Directeur de Recherche CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette ROISIN Yves, Professeur Université de Bruxelles (Belgique) BAGNÈRES-URBANY Anne-Geneviève, CR1 CNRS Université de Tours CLÉMENT Jean-Luc, Professeur CNRS, Paris / Université de Tours ERRARD Christine, Maître de Conférence Université de Tours MARINI Mario, Professeur Université de Bologne (Italie) Remerciements Ce manuscrit est la conclusion de mes trois années en tant qu'étudiant de troisième cycle à l'Université François Rabelais de Tours. Le travail a été réalisé au sein du laboratoire de Neurobiologie du CNRS de Marseille, et pour la dernière année à l'Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de Insecte (IRBI) de Tours. Je voudrais exprimer ma gratitude envers Marie-Louise Cariou et Yves Roisin qui ont accepté d'être les rapporteurs scientifiques de ce travail, ainsi que les autres membres de mon jury. Je voudrais tout d'abord remercier la ville de Domène (Isère), le CNRS, le Ministère de l'Équipement, le Conseil Général de l'Isère et la Métro (Communauté de communes de l'agglomération grenobloise) qui ont co-financé cette thèse. Cette étude m'a permis de m'investir dans le côte appliqué de la recherche. J'adresse mes remerciements à Anne-Geneviève Bagnères pour son soutien et nos discussions fructueuses tout au long de mon travail. Je tiens également à la remercier pour sa confiance et sa disponibilité "sans horaire" que j'ai énormément appréciées. Je tiens à remercier Jean-Luc Clément pour m'avoir accueilli dans son laboratoire et pour la curiosité et l'énergie qu'il a toujours témoignées. Je remercie toutes les personnes qui m'ont aidé avec sympathie pendant mon séjour à Marseille : Marielle Renucci et Alain Tirard pour leurs conseils et leur patience pour ce nouveau collègue de paillasse ; Leam Sreng pour sa disponibilité et son humour ; Eric Provost pour sa gentillesse et sa sympathie ; George Dusticier pour son support technique ; Bernadette Besson pour son rôle de guide dans l'enchevêtrement de papiers à remplir, et enfin Sandrine et Sylvie pour tous les moments que j'ai pu partager avec elles. Je remercie également Marc Ohresser pour sa sympathie et tous ses conseils astucieux que l'on ne trouve pas dans les manuels. 1 Je remercie Josiane Aubert pour m'avoir aidé dans les premières étapes de ce travail, ainsi que toute l'équipe du laboratoire de Systématique Évolutive de Marseille pour son accueil. Merci à toutes les personnes de l'IRBI qui m'ont accueilli lors de mon déménagement à Tours : leur chaleur humaine a su largement compenser le changement climatique ! Je tiens à remercier James Austin pour notre collaboration fructueuse dans l'étude des relations phylogénétiques des termites européens. Merci également à Alexandre Quintana, pour sa collaboration et tous les échanges qu'on a eu au cours de notre parcours de thésards. Des échantillons de termites ont été obtenus grâce à la collaboration de DowAgrosciences, Hygiène et Charpentes (Marseille), Mr. Landrin (DDE13) et Dani Simon (Université de Tel Aviv, Israël) que je remercie vivement. Merci à l'Association des Villes Termitées et à la Section Française IUSSI pour leur aide financière concernant ma participation au congrès international au Japon. Je ne pouvais pas terminer sans remercier la petite "équipe termites" qui m'a accepté dans la salle des étudiants même si porteur d'un chromosome Y. Alors, merci à Fanny, Magda et Armelle. Je leur souhaite de garder toujours leur vitalité spontanée et d'être heureuses dans ce qu'elles entreprendront dans leur futur. Merci à toutes les personnes que j'ai eu l'occasion de rencontrer et qui ont marqué mon expérience en France dont la liste ne rentrerait pas dans cette page, et merci également à mes amis en Italie qui m'ont fait comprendre que l'amitié ne considère pas les distances. Et grazie à ma famille pour tout son soutien, et qui continue à se poser la question "Est-ce vraiment nécessaire de partir pendant si longtemps et si loin pour étudier des organismes aussi petits ?". 2 Sommaire Figures ........................................................................................................... 5 Avant-propos.................................................................................................. 6 Structure de l'ouvrage ...................................................................... 6 Annexe confidentielle de la thèse........................................................ 7 Introduction ............................................................................................... 8 Le genre Reticulitermes en Europe : une taxonomie en évolution .................. 8 Systématique moléculaire du genre Reticulitermes ...................................... 10 Les Reticulitermes en GenBank ........................................................ 10 Le concept d'espèce – Le cas de R. sp. nov. .................................................. 11 Outils pour l'identification des espèces ........................................................ 14 Les hydrocarbures cuticulaires ......................................................... 14 Structure et fonctions de la cuticule.......................................... 14 Variations intra- et inter-coloniales........................................... 15 Les substances défensives des soldats .............................................. 16 Les marqueurs génétiques............................................................... 16 Le génome mitochondrial........................................................ 17 Le génome nucléaire : les ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer)........ 19 De la recherche à l'application : le cas de Reticulitermes sp. nov. ................ 20 Matériel et méthodes ............................................................................. 22 Matériel biologique ....................................................................................... 22 Morphologie.................................................................................................. 23 Hydrocarbures cuticulaires........................................................................... 23 Procédure d'extraction des composés cuticulaires ............................... 23 Analyse des données ...................................................................... 24 3 Analyse en composante principale (ACP) ................................... 24 Analyse génétique moléculaire ..................................................................... 25 Analyse phylogénétique .................................................................. 25 Terminologie......................................................................... 25 Alignement des séquences ...................................................... 26 Méthodes de reconstruction phylogénétique .............................. 26 Neighbor-Joining (NJ) .......................................................... 27 Maximum de Parcimonie (MP) ............................................... 27 Maximum de Vraisemblance (Maximum Likelihood, ML) ............ 28 Évaluation du support interne.................................................. 28 Utilisation de contraintes ........................................................ 29 Visualisation des arbres phylogénétiques .................................. 30 Analyse "Total Evidence".............................................................................. 30 Résultats et Discussion ......................................................................... 32 Systématique moléculaire de Reticulitermes sp. nov.................................... 32 Analyse comparative et combinée des Reticulitermes européens ................. 34 Analyse comparative des populations italiennes de Reticulitermes lucifugus37 Communications scientifiques ...................................................................... 39 Conclusion générale ............................................................................... 41 Références bibliographiques ........................................................................ 44 4 Figures 1) Aire de répartition des Reticulitermes dans
Recommended publications
  • Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Wisconsin
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 37 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 Numbers Article 3 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 April 2004 Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin Andrew H. Williams University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Andrew H. 2004. "Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 37 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol37/iss1/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Williams: Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wiscon 16 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 37, Nos. 1 & 2 FEEDING RECORDS OF TRUE BUGS (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA) FROM WISCONSIN Andrew H. Williams1 ABSTRACT Basic to our understanding of any animal and its habitat requirements is knowing what it eats. Reported here are observations of feeding by 49 species of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) encountered in Wisconsin over 1992-2002. ____________________ Knowing what an animal eats is basic to our understanding of that ani- mal and its habitat requirements. From 1992 through 2002, I accumulated many observations of insects feeding in Wisconsin. Presented here are data from 49 species and subspecies in 11 families including Alydidae, Berytidae, Coreidae, Cydnidae, Lygaeidae, Miridae, Nabidae, Pentatomidae, Reduviidae, Rhopalidae and Scutelleridae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Social Parasitism in Formica Ants Revealed by a Global Phylogeny – Supplementary Figures, Tables, and References
    The evolution of social parasitism in Formica ants revealed by a global phylogeny – Supplementary figures, tables, and references Marek L. Borowiec Stefan P. Cover Christian Rabeling 1 Supplementary Methods Data availability Trimmed reads generated for this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (to be submit­ ted upon publication). Detailed voucher collection information, assembled sequences, analyzed matrices, configuration files and output of all analyses, and code used are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zen­ odo.4341310). Taxon sampling For this study we gathered samples collected in the past ~60 years which were available as either ethanol­ preserved or point­mounted specimens. Taxon sampling comprises 101 newly sequenced ingroup morphos­ pecies from all seven species groups of Formica ants Creighton (1950) that were recognized prior to our study and 8 outgroup species. Our sampling was guided by previous taxonomic and phylogenetic work Creighton (1950); Francoeur (1973); Snelling and Buren (1985); Seifert (2000, 2002, 2004); Goropashnaya et al. (2004, 2012); Trager et al. (2007); Trager (2013); Seifert and Schultz (2009a,b); Muñoz­López et al. (2012); Antonov and Bukin (2016); Chen and Zhou (2017); Romiguier et al. (2018) and included represen­ tatives from both the New and the Old World. Collection data associated with sequenced samples can be found in Table S1. Molecular data collection and sequencing We performed non­destructive extraction and preserved same­specimen vouchers for each newly sequenced sample. We re­mounted all vouchers, assigned unique specimen identifiers (Table S1), and deposited them in the ASU Social Insect Biodiversity Repository (contact: Christian Rabeling, [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Formicidae)1
    THE ANTS OF THE KILDEER PLAIN AREA OF OHIO (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE)1 MARY ELIZABETH AMSTUTZ, 203 Samaritan Ave., Ashland, Ohio This paper consists of a description of the Kildeer Plain, a list of the varieties of ants found, and some notes in regard to their habits of nesting as observed in this area. Wherever variations in the geological conditions of a region occur, there are found corresponding differences both in the flora and fauna. The climatic conditions including temperature, precipitation, etc., may be quite similar, yet there appear an amazing number of different habitats for living organisms. The very fact that one type of soil is composed of clay while another is composed chiefly of sand or the fact that here may be good drainage while at some distant point may be none at all, certainly determines in no small measure the type of organism which will exist or fail to find desirable environment. This is true on a large scale across the entire width of the continent, on a smaller scale in the separate states and still more minutely, within the counties themselves. The species of ants found in the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio are of particular interest to the myrmecologist, for here is a small area which geologically is unusual in the state. The following list embracing twenty-seven species, subspecies and varieties is undoubtedly incomplete. Ants have been taken from as many varied habitats as a small plain area presents. They have been taken in a dense oak-hickory forest at the edge of the prairie, on sloping banks of the Tymochtee Creek, along roadsides, in open prairie fields, many of which have not been under cultivation for five or six decades, and open fields that are again being put under cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Actas Portuguesas De Horticultura
    31 Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura 2020 VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura FICHA TÉCNICA Título: VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Coleção: Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, N.º 31 Propriedade e edição Associação Portuguesa de Horticultura (APH) Rua da Junqueira, 299, 1300-338 Lisboa http://www.aphorticultura.pt Editores Nuno Rodrigues Ana Cristina Ramos José Alberto Pereira Grafismo da capa: Nuno Rodrigues ISBN: 978-972-8936-38-9 Ano: 2020 Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, nº 31 (2020) i VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Comissões Comissão organizadora Ana Cristina Ramos (INIAV; APH) Cristina Sempiterno (INIAV) Francisco Pavão (CAP) José Alberto Pereira (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH) Margarida Oliveira (ESA-IPS) Nuno Barba (ESA-IPS) Nuno Rodrigues (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH) Pedro Jordão (INIAV), Presidente Rocío Arias Calderón (INIAV; APH) Comissão cientifica Ana Paula Silva (CITAB/UTAD) António Cordeiro (INIAV) António Ramos (ESA/IPCB) Augusto António Peixe (Univ. Évora) Encarnação Marcelo (INIAV) Fátima Peres (ESA-IPCB) Isabel Ferreira (ISA-UL) José Alberto Pereira (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH), Presidente José Peça (Univ. Évora) Laura Torres (CITAB, UTAD) Paula Baptista (CIMO/ESA-IPB) Pedro Reis (INIAV) Secretariado Carlos Reis (ESA/IPB) Marta Madureira (ESA/IPB) Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, nº 31 (2020) ii VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Prefácio A Associação Portuguesa de Horticultura (APH) tem o prazer de apresentar o volume 31 das Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, que contém parte das comunicações apresentadas, sob a forma de comunicações orais e em painéis, no VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura, que decorreu em Santarém de 7 a 10 de junho de 2018. É já longa a tradição do Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura, que ao longo de oito edições sempre se assumiu como o principal fórum de discussão, das problemáticas do setor no nosso País.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross-Taxonomic Comparison of Insect Responses to Grassland Management and Land-Use Legacies 1, 1 1 2 3 DIANE M
    Copyright of the Ecological Society of America. A cross-taxonomic comparison of insect responses to grassland management and land-use legacies 1, 1 1 2 3 DIANE M. DEBINSKI, RAYMOND A. MORANZ, JOHN T. DELANEY, JAMES R. MILLER, DAVID M. ENGLE, 1 4,7 5 6 LAURA B. WINKLER, DEVAN A. MCGRANAHAN, ROBERT J. BARNEY, JAMES C. TRAGER, 4 4 ANDREW L. STEPHENSON, AND MOLLY K. GILLESPIE 1Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA 2Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 USA 3Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 USA 4Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA 5Agricultural and Environmental Research Station, West Virginia State University, Institute, West Virginia 25112 USA 6Shaw Nature Reserve, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 USA Citation: Debinski, D. D., R. A. Moranz, J. T. Delaney, J. R. Miller, D. M. Engle, L. B. Winkler, D. A. McGranahan, R. J. Barney, J. C. Trager, A. L. Stephenson, and M. K. Gillespie. 2011. A cross-taxonomic comparison of insect responses to grassland management and land-use legacies. Ecosphere 2(12):131. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00226.1 Abstract. Many species of plants and animals associated with grasslands are rare or declining due to habitat loss and degradation. Although grassland plants and insects evolved in the context of both grazing and fire, the appropriate use of grazing and fire has been debated among those concerned with protecting insect communities. We established an experiment to test insect responses to three grassland management treatments: (1) patch-burn graze (burning of spatially distinct patches and free access by cattle), (2) graze- and-burn (burning of entire tract with free access by cattle), and (3) burn-only.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Social Hymenoptera (Ants, Some Bees, and Some Wasps), Colonies of Ants Appear to Live Longest
    PRAIRIE ANT COLONY LONGEVITY AND MOUND GROWTH BY GREGG HENDERSON 1, RUSSEL O. WAGNER2, AND ROBERT L. JEANNE INTRODUCTION Of the social Hymenoptera (ants, some bees, and some wasps), colonies of ants appear to live longest. However, little information bearing on ant colony longevity exists (Wilson, 1971; Tschinkel, 1988), and much of it is anecdotal. Darwin (1859), for example, commented that some ant colonies must live as long as a human generation, and Forel (1928), fascinated by a colony of Formica pratensis in his childhood, found the nest still active 56 years later. Donisthorpe (1915) knew of a rufa nest in Weybridge, England, that was active for at least 20 years. More recently, long-term monitoring of mound growth has been conducted in an attempt to understand colony population dynamics (Andrews, 1925; Dreyer and Park, 1932; Dreyer, 1942; Scherba, 1958; Talbot, 1961). Dreyer (1942) projected a 25- to 30-year maxi- mum colony lifetime for Formica ulkei Emery, based on average changes in mound size for a population of colonies. Andrews (1925) took mound measurements for 19 years on a single nest of Formica exsectoides Forel, showing a clear exponential growth in mound size in the first half of the colony's life. Recently Tschinkel (1988) found that colony growth in Solenopsis invicta Buren fits a logistic curve, supporting the hypothesis that the growth of social insect colonies is regulated by density-dependent negative feedback mech- anisms (Wilson, 1971; Oster and Wilson, 1978; Levings and Tra- niello, 1981; H611dobler, 1986; Rissing, 1987; Tschinkel, 1988). Individual ant-mounds of the prairie ant, Formica montana Emery, discovered in a prairie remnant in southwestern Wisconsin, were mapped in 1956.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
    The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio Journal of Science (Ohio Academy of Science) Ohio Journal of Science: Volume 43, Issue 4 (July, 1943) 1943-07 The Ants of the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Amstutz, Mary Elizabeth The Ohio Journal of Science. v43 n4 (July, 1943), 165-173 http://hdl.handle.net/1811/3330 Downloaded from the Knowledge Bank, The Ohio State University's institutional repository THE ANTS OF THE KILDEER PLAIN AREA OF OHIO (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE)1 MARY ELIZABETH AMSTUTZ, 203 Samaritan Ave., Ashland, Ohio This paper consists of a description of the Kildeer Plain, a list of the varieties of ants found, and some notes in regard to their habits of nesting as observed in this area. Wherever variations in the geological conditions of a region occur, there are found corresponding differences both in the flora and fauna. The climatic conditions including temperature, precipitation, etc., may be quite similar, yet there appear an amazing number of different habitats for living organisms. The very fact that one type of soil is composed of clay while another is composed chiefly of sand or the fact that here may be good drainage while at some distant point may be none at all, certainly determines in no small measure the type of organism which will exist or fail to find desirable environment. This is true on a large scale across the entire width of the continent, on a smaller scale in the separate states and still more minutely, within the counties themselves. The species of ants found in the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio are of particular interest to the myrmecologist, for here is a small area which geologically is unusual in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Ants of Montana By
    A CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF MONTANA BY GEORGE C. WHEELER AND JEANETTE WHEELER Research Associates, Florida Department of Agriculture The history of myrmecology in Montana probably began in 1913 with Wheeler's description of Formica subpolita from Helena and 1914 when he described a new species, Manica hunteri from Gallatin County. A considerable hiatus ensued until 1932 when Cole recorded Pogonomyrmex occidentalis from Custer County. In 1973 Borchert and Anderson published a thorough ecological analysis of the ants of the Bearpaw Mountains, one of the small ranges, which is mostly in Hill County. Thirty-three species were reported. In 1984 Youngs and Campbell published the results of a study of ants preying upon the western spruce budworm near the western border. They reported 4 species of Camponotus and 7 species of Formica from 3 localities in Missoula County and one in Sanders County, but they failed to indicate which species was taken in which locality. These records are indicated by YC. Six other authors have contributed a few records each. From Wing we got four records as spots on maps. D. R. Smith contrib- uted three species for the whole state. Five records are represented by gifts of specimens from Creighton. Finally we are greatly indebted to Roy R. Snelling for sending us 63 additional records based on specimens in the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum. During the summers of 1956, 1961, 1963, 1964 and 1965, while we were still at the University of North Dakota (Grand Forks), we made seven field trips into Montana to observe and collect ants in 32 of the 56 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.4 166.4 436 502,6 542,0 None Water 591,0 656,5 669,6 746,5 762.2
    TABLE 3.8.1-7 Bald Eagle Winter Roost Habitat Evaluation along the Keystone Project Route State, Roost/Nest near Milepost Status County ROW Water Body Name - Comments Keystone Mainline 7.4 Frozen (no North Dakota, Nest Pembina River - 2 golden eagles perched roost survey) Cavalier near river 166.4 Frozen (no North Dakota, None Sheyenne River - no eagles observed roost survey) Ransom 436 Open South Dakota None Missouri River - 10 bald eagles about Yankton 5 miles upstream 502,6 Frozen (no Nebraska, None Elkhorn River- no eagles observed roost survey) Stanton 542,0 Limited open Nebraska, None Platte River - roosting more than 1 mile water Colfax/Buller upstream form ROW 591,0 Frozen (no Nebraska, None West Fork Big Blue River - no eagles roost survey) Saline observed 656,5 Open Kansas, Roost/nest Big Blue River - 2 baid eagles within 1 mile Marshall of ROW 669,6 Frozen (no Kansas, None South Fork Big Nemaha River - no eagles roost survey) Nemaha observed 746,5 Open Kansas! Roosts Missouri River - -12 eagles in or near ROW Missouri 762.2 Frozen (no Missouri, None Platte River - no eagles observed roost survey) Buchanan 772,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Castile Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Clinton 760,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Uttle Platte River - no eagles observed roost survey) Clinton 640,6 Open Missouri, None Grand River - no eagles observed Carroll 645,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Salt Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Chariton 657,6 Frozen (no Missouri, None Mussel Fork Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Chariton
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Species Diversity, Composition and Trophic Structure
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1986 Arthropod Species Diversity, Composition and Trophic Structure at the Soil Level Biotope of Three Northeastern Illinois Prairie Remnants, with Botanical Characterization for Each Site Dean George Stathakis Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Stathakis, Dean George, "Arthropod Species Diversity, Composition and Trophic Structure at the Soil Level Biotope of Three Northeastern Illinois Prairie Remnants, with Botanical Characterization for Each Site" (1986). Master's Theses. 3435. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1986 Dean George Stathakis ARTHROPOD SPECIES DIVERSITY, COMPOSITION AND TROPHIC STRUCTURE AT THE SOIL LEVEL BIOTOPE OF THREE NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS PRAIRIE REMNANTS, WITH BOTANICAL CHARACTERIZATION FOR EACH SITE by Dean George Stathakis A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science April 1986 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Drs. John Smarrelli and Walter J. Tabachnick for their valuable comments, criticisms and suggestions regarding this manuscript. Thanks also to Dr. John J. Janssen for his advice in developing the computer programs used in the data analysis; Don McFall, Illinois Department of Conservation for the information on Illinois prairies; Alberts.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrmecological News Myrmecologicalnews.Org
    Myrmecological News myrmecologicalnews.org Myrmecol. News 30 Digital supplementary material Digital supplementary material to DE LA MORA, A., SANKOVITZ, M. & PURCELL, J. 2020: Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as host and intruder: recent advances and future directions in the study of exploitative strategies. – Myrmecological News 30: 53-71. The content of this digital supplementary material was subject to the same scientific editorial processing as the article it accompanies. However, the authors are responsible for copyediting and layout. Supporting Material for: de la Mora, Sankovitz, & Purcell. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as host and intruder: recent advances and future directions in the study of exploitative strategies Table S1: This table summarizes host/parasite relationships that have been described or discussed in the literature since 2000. Host and parasite nomenclature is up‐to‐date based on AntWeb.org, but note that some of the taxonomy is controversial and/or not fully resolved. Names are likely to change further in coming years. Due to changing nomenclature, it can be challenging to track which species have been well‐studied. We provide recently changed species and genus names parenthetically. In addition, we have split this table to show recent taxonomic revisions, compilations (e.g. tables in empirical papers), reviews, books, or species descriptions supporting relationships between hosts and parasites in one column and articles studying characteristics of host/parasite relationships in a second column. For well‐studied species, we limit the ‘primary research’ column to five citations, which are selected to cover different topics and different research teams when such diverse citations exist. Because of the active work on taxonomy in many groups, some misinformation has been inadvertently propagated in previous articles.
    [Show full text]