A Cross-Taxonomic Comparison of Insect Responses to Grassland Management and Land-Use Legacies 1, 1 1 2 3 DIANE M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups. -
Relations Phylogénétiques Chez Les Termites Du Genre Reticulitermes En Europe. Description D'une Nouvelle Espèce
Relations phylog´en´etiqueschez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle esp`ece. Paolo Uva To cite this version: Paolo Uva. Relations phylog´en´etiqueschez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle esp`ece.. Ecologie, Environnement. Universit´eFran¸coisRabelais - Tours, 2002. Fran¸cais. <tel-00114554> HAL Id: tel-00114554 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00114554 Submitted on 17 Nov 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. UNIVERSITÉ FRANÇOIS RABELAIS TOURS École Doctorale : Santé, Sciences, Technologies Année Universitaire : 2001/2002 THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS Discipline : Sciences de la Vie présentée et soutenue publiquement par : Paolo UVA Le 8 novembre 2002 Relations phylogénétiques chez les termites du genre Reticulitermes en Europe. Description d'une nouvelle espèce Directeur de thèse : Dr. BAGNÈRES-URBANY Anne-Geneviève Jury : CARIOU Marie-Louise, Directeur de Recherche CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette ROISIN Yves, Professeur Université de Bruxelles (Belgique) BAGNÈRES-URBANY Anne-Geneviève, CR1 CNRS Université de Tours CLÉMENT Jean-Luc, Professeur CNRS, Paris / Université de Tours ERRARD Christine, Maître de Conférence Université de Tours MARINI Mario, Professeur Université de Bologne (Italie) Remerciements Ce manuscrit est la conclusion de mes trois années en tant qu'étudiant de troisième cycle à l'Université François Rabelais de Tours. -
Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Wisconsin
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 37 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 Numbers Article 3 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2004 April 2004 Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin Andrew H. Williams University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Andrew H. 2004. "Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wisconsin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 37 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol37/iss1/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Williams: Feeding Records of True Bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) From Wiscon 16 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 37, Nos. 1 & 2 FEEDING RECORDS OF TRUE BUGS (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA) FROM WISCONSIN Andrew H. Williams1 ABSTRACT Basic to our understanding of any animal and its habitat requirements is knowing what it eats. Reported here are observations of feeding by 49 species of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) encountered in Wisconsin over 1992-2002. ____________________ Knowing what an animal eats is basic to our understanding of that ani- mal and its habitat requirements. From 1992 through 2002, I accumulated many observations of insects feeding in Wisconsin. Presented here are data from 49 species and subspecies in 11 families including Alydidae, Berytidae, Coreidae, Cydnidae, Lygaeidae, Miridae, Nabidae, Pentatomidae, Reduviidae, Rhopalidae and Scutelleridae. -
The Evolution of Social Parasitism in Formica Ants Revealed by a Global Phylogeny – Supplementary Figures, Tables, and References
The evolution of social parasitism in Formica ants revealed by a global phylogeny – Supplementary figures, tables, and references Marek L. Borowiec Stefan P. Cover Christian Rabeling 1 Supplementary Methods Data availability Trimmed reads generated for this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (to be submit ted upon publication). Detailed voucher collection information, assembled sequences, analyzed matrices, configuration files and output of all analyses, and code used are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zen odo.4341310). Taxon sampling For this study we gathered samples collected in the past ~60 years which were available as either ethanol preserved or pointmounted specimens. Taxon sampling comprises 101 newly sequenced ingroup morphos pecies from all seven species groups of Formica ants Creighton (1950) that were recognized prior to our study and 8 outgroup species. Our sampling was guided by previous taxonomic and phylogenetic work Creighton (1950); Francoeur (1973); Snelling and Buren (1985); Seifert (2000, 2002, 2004); Goropashnaya et al. (2004, 2012); Trager et al. (2007); Trager (2013); Seifert and Schultz (2009a,b); MuñozLópez et al. (2012); Antonov and Bukin (2016); Chen and Zhou (2017); Romiguier et al. (2018) and included represen tatives from both the New and the Old World. Collection data associated with sequenced samples can be found in Table S1. Molecular data collection and sequencing We performed nondestructive extraction and preserved samespecimen vouchers for each newly sequenced sample. We remounted all vouchers, assigned unique specimen identifiers (Table S1), and deposited them in the ASU Social Insect Biodiversity Repository (contact: Christian Rabeling, [email protected]). -
Butterflies of North America
Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS -
Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL. -
Hymenoptera, Formicidae)1
THE ANTS OF THE KILDEER PLAIN AREA OF OHIO (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE)1 MARY ELIZABETH AMSTUTZ, 203 Samaritan Ave., Ashland, Ohio This paper consists of a description of the Kildeer Plain, a list of the varieties of ants found, and some notes in regard to their habits of nesting as observed in this area. Wherever variations in the geological conditions of a region occur, there are found corresponding differences both in the flora and fauna. The climatic conditions including temperature, precipitation, etc., may be quite similar, yet there appear an amazing number of different habitats for living organisms. The very fact that one type of soil is composed of clay while another is composed chiefly of sand or the fact that here may be good drainage while at some distant point may be none at all, certainly determines in no small measure the type of organism which will exist or fail to find desirable environment. This is true on a large scale across the entire width of the continent, on a smaller scale in the separate states and still more minutely, within the counties themselves. The species of ants found in the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio are of particular interest to the myrmecologist, for here is a small area which geologically is unusual in the state. The following list embracing twenty-seven species, subspecies and varieties is undoubtedly incomplete. Ants have been taken from as many varied habitats as a small plain area presents. They have been taken in a dense oak-hickory forest at the edge of the prairie, on sloping banks of the Tymochtee Creek, along roadsides, in open prairie fields, many of which have not been under cultivation for five or six decades, and open fields that are again being put under cultivation. -
31 Actas Portuguesas De Horticultura
31 Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura 2020 VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura FICHA TÉCNICA Título: VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Coleção: Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, N.º 31 Propriedade e edição Associação Portuguesa de Horticultura (APH) Rua da Junqueira, 299, 1300-338 Lisboa http://www.aphorticultura.pt Editores Nuno Rodrigues Ana Cristina Ramos José Alberto Pereira Grafismo da capa: Nuno Rodrigues ISBN: 978-972-8936-38-9 Ano: 2020 Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, nº 31 (2020) i VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Comissões Comissão organizadora Ana Cristina Ramos (INIAV; APH) Cristina Sempiterno (INIAV) Francisco Pavão (CAP) José Alberto Pereira (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH) Margarida Oliveira (ESA-IPS) Nuno Barba (ESA-IPS) Nuno Rodrigues (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH) Pedro Jordão (INIAV), Presidente Rocío Arias Calderón (INIAV; APH) Comissão cientifica Ana Paula Silva (CITAB/UTAD) António Cordeiro (INIAV) António Ramos (ESA/IPCB) Augusto António Peixe (Univ. Évora) Encarnação Marcelo (INIAV) Fátima Peres (ESA-IPCB) Isabel Ferreira (ISA-UL) José Alberto Pereira (CIMO/ESA-IPB; APH), Presidente José Peça (Univ. Évora) Laura Torres (CITAB, UTAD) Paula Baptista (CIMO/ESA-IPB) Pedro Reis (INIAV) Secretariado Carlos Reis (ESA/IPB) Marta Madureira (ESA/IPB) Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, nº 31 (2020) ii VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura Prefácio A Associação Portuguesa de Horticultura (APH) tem o prazer de apresentar o volume 31 das Actas Portuguesas de Horticultura, que contém parte das comunicações apresentadas, sob a forma de comunicações orais e em painéis, no VIII Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura, que decorreu em Santarém de 7 a 10 de junho de 2018. É já longa a tradição do Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura, que ao longo de oito edições sempre se assumiu como o principal fórum de discussão, das problemáticas do setor no nosso País. -
Of the Social Hymenoptera (Ants, Some Bees, and Some Wasps), Colonies of Ants Appear to Live Longest
PRAIRIE ANT COLONY LONGEVITY AND MOUND GROWTH BY GREGG HENDERSON 1, RUSSEL O. WAGNER2, AND ROBERT L. JEANNE INTRODUCTION Of the social Hymenoptera (ants, some bees, and some wasps), colonies of ants appear to live longest. However, little information bearing on ant colony longevity exists (Wilson, 1971; Tschinkel, 1988), and much of it is anecdotal. Darwin (1859), for example, commented that some ant colonies must live as long as a human generation, and Forel (1928), fascinated by a colony of Formica pratensis in his childhood, found the nest still active 56 years later. Donisthorpe (1915) knew of a rufa nest in Weybridge, England, that was active for at least 20 years. More recently, long-term monitoring of mound growth has been conducted in an attempt to understand colony population dynamics (Andrews, 1925; Dreyer and Park, 1932; Dreyer, 1942; Scherba, 1958; Talbot, 1961). Dreyer (1942) projected a 25- to 30-year maxi- mum colony lifetime for Formica ulkei Emery, based on average changes in mound size for a population of colonies. Andrews (1925) took mound measurements for 19 years on a single nest of Formica exsectoides Forel, showing a clear exponential growth in mound size in the first half of the colony's life. Recently Tschinkel (1988) found that colony growth in Solenopsis invicta Buren fits a logistic curve, supporting the hypothesis that the growth of social insect colonies is regulated by density-dependent negative feedback mech- anisms (Wilson, 1971; Oster and Wilson, 1978; Levings and Tra- niello, 1981; H611dobler, 1986; Rissing, 1987; Tschinkel, 1988). Individual ant-mounds of the prairie ant, Formica montana Emery, discovered in a prairie remnant in southwestern Wisconsin, were mapped in 1956. -
Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio Journal of Science (Ohio Academy of Science) Ohio Journal of Science: Volume 43, Issue 4 (July, 1943) 1943-07 The Ants of the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Amstutz, Mary Elizabeth The Ohio Journal of Science. v43 n4 (July, 1943), 165-173 http://hdl.handle.net/1811/3330 Downloaded from the Knowledge Bank, The Ohio State University's institutional repository THE ANTS OF THE KILDEER PLAIN AREA OF OHIO (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE)1 MARY ELIZABETH AMSTUTZ, 203 Samaritan Ave., Ashland, Ohio This paper consists of a description of the Kildeer Plain, a list of the varieties of ants found, and some notes in regard to their habits of nesting as observed in this area. Wherever variations in the geological conditions of a region occur, there are found corresponding differences both in the flora and fauna. The climatic conditions including temperature, precipitation, etc., may be quite similar, yet there appear an amazing number of different habitats for living organisms. The very fact that one type of soil is composed of clay while another is composed chiefly of sand or the fact that here may be good drainage while at some distant point may be none at all, certainly determines in no small measure the type of organism which will exist or fail to find desirable environment. This is true on a large scale across the entire width of the continent, on a smaller scale in the separate states and still more minutely, within the counties themselves. The species of ants found in the Kildeer Plain Area of Ohio are of particular interest to the myrmecologist, for here is a small area which geologically is unusual in the state. -
A Checklist of the Ants of Montana By
A CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF MONTANA BY GEORGE C. WHEELER AND JEANETTE WHEELER Research Associates, Florida Department of Agriculture The history of myrmecology in Montana probably began in 1913 with Wheeler's description of Formica subpolita from Helena and 1914 when he described a new species, Manica hunteri from Gallatin County. A considerable hiatus ensued until 1932 when Cole recorded Pogonomyrmex occidentalis from Custer County. In 1973 Borchert and Anderson published a thorough ecological analysis of the ants of the Bearpaw Mountains, one of the small ranges, which is mostly in Hill County. Thirty-three species were reported. In 1984 Youngs and Campbell published the results of a study of ants preying upon the western spruce budworm near the western border. They reported 4 species of Camponotus and 7 species of Formica from 3 localities in Missoula County and one in Sanders County, but they failed to indicate which species was taken in which locality. These records are indicated by YC. Six other authors have contributed a few records each. From Wing we got four records as spots on maps. D. R. Smith contrib- uted three species for the whole state. Five records are represented by gifts of specimens from Creighton. Finally we are greatly indebted to Roy R. Snelling for sending us 63 additional records based on specimens in the Los Angeles County Natural History Museum. During the summers of 1956, 1961, 1963, 1964 and 1965, while we were still at the University of North Dakota (Grand Forks), we made seven field trips into Montana to observe and collect ants in 32 of the 56 counties. -
7.4 166.4 436 502,6 542,0 None Water 591,0 656,5 669,6 746,5 762.2
TABLE 3.8.1-7 Bald Eagle Winter Roost Habitat Evaluation along the Keystone Project Route State, Roost/Nest near Milepost Status County ROW Water Body Name - Comments Keystone Mainline 7.4 Frozen (no North Dakota, Nest Pembina River - 2 golden eagles perched roost survey) Cavalier near river 166.4 Frozen (no North Dakota, None Sheyenne River - no eagles observed roost survey) Ransom 436 Open South Dakota None Missouri River - 10 bald eagles about Yankton 5 miles upstream 502,6 Frozen (no Nebraska, None Elkhorn River- no eagles observed roost survey) Stanton 542,0 Limited open Nebraska, None Platte River - roosting more than 1 mile water Colfax/Buller upstream form ROW 591,0 Frozen (no Nebraska, None West Fork Big Blue River - no eagles roost survey) Saline observed 656,5 Open Kansas, Roost/nest Big Blue River - 2 baid eagles within 1 mile Marshall of ROW 669,6 Frozen (no Kansas, None South Fork Big Nemaha River - no eagles roost survey) Nemaha observed 746,5 Open Kansas! Roosts Missouri River - -12 eagles in or near ROW Missouri 762.2 Frozen (no Missouri, None Platte River - no eagles observed roost survey) Buchanan 772,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Castile Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Clinton 760,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Uttle Platte River - no eagles observed roost survey) Clinton 640,6 Open Missouri, None Grand River - no eagles observed Carroll 645,9 Frozen (no Missouri, None Salt Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Chariton 657,6 Frozen (no Missouri, None Mussel Fork Creek - no eagles observed roost survey) Chariton