DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF} M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF} M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom M Heavy Tank – The Tank Museum Here at Walmart. Your email address will never be sold or distributed to a third party for any reason. Sorry, but we can't respond to individual comments. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Customer Care. Your feedback helps us make Walmart shopping better for millions of customers. Recent searches Clear All. Enter Location. Update location. Learn more. Report incorrect product information. Kenneth Estes; Richard Chasemore. Walmart Free delivery Arrives by Tuesday, Nov 3. Pickup not available. Add to list. Add to registry. About This Item. We aim to show you accurate product information. Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. See our disclaimer. Specifications Series Title New Vanguard. Write a review See all reviews Write a review. Average Rating: 5. June 7, See more. Reviewed by Snugglebunnehh Snugglebunnehh. Average Rating: 4. May 9, Reviewed by CharlesFerdinand CharlesFerdinand. Written by a librarything. April 19, Reviewed by Shrike58 Shrike Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly. Your question required. Additional details. Send me an email when my question is answered. Please enter a valid email address. I agree to the Terms and Conditions. Cancel Submit. Pricing policy About our prices. We're committed to providing low prices every day, on everything. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. For the Marine Corps, it served the purpose defined for it in until the automotive and weapons technology of the United States could produce viable alternatives. Biographical Note. Kenneth W Estes is a Naval Academy graduate who served in a variety of command and staff assignments in the US Marine Corps until his retirement in He is the editor of several books, and has written extensively in military and academic journals throughout his career. Kenneth was made an Honorary Legionnaire in the Spanish Legion in You may also be interested in the following product s. More info. Military History. Subscribe to our newsletter. Subscribe To see how we use this information about you and how you can unsubscribe from our newsletter subscriptions, view our Privacy Policy. Related Content. See all related content. Google Books Search. New Vanguard: M Heavy Tank (Paperback) - - Unlike the T32, M's turret is massive and of limited durability, with only its mantlet and cheeks being somewhat durable. Further complicating things, the hull armor is also on the weak side, with only the upper glacis offering some meaningful protection. And if that were not enough, the M is also a very large tank and therefore a juicy target for artillery. Thankfully, what the M lacks in armor protection, it compensates in firepower and to a lesser extent mobility. Its top gun, the mm Gun M58, is the same gun used on the TE5 a tier higher, and comes with good rate of fire, penetration both standard and premium , a good -8 degrees of gun depression and decent gun handling and aimtime. Do be aware that the tank's ammo capacity is limited though, so you should make every shot count for maximum efficiency. As for mobility, while its speed is average at best and its reverse speed is plain terrible , for its size it is a fairly quick tank with good acceleration and ground resistance, and can keep up the pace during a push. Never rush to the frontlines though, as the M cannot take much punishment - leave that job to tougher heavy tanks like the German E 75 or the Soviet Object Overall, the M should be considered a "force multiplier", a tank that by itself is overall average, but that excels as support when part of a group. Use cover whenever possible, including your heavily armored allies, and seek opportunities to put your excellent firepower to good use, but never overcommit as that would only result in a trip back to the garage. Its long-ranged mm cannon was designed to hit enemy tanks at extreme distances, but it was never used in combat. In a series of tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Testing was unsatisfactory, and the tanks were all stored in August Only after recommending improvements, on 26 April the tank was standardized as the M Heavy Tank. The successive versions of the M shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 a main battle tank were all considered 90 mm gun medium tanks. Tracks, rollers and suspension elements were the same, with some modification to take into account the greater weight. The engine and transmission were never modified enough to give the extra power needed for the greater weight of the M, and as a result, the tank was relatively underpowered and the drive systems were fragile. The turret of the M was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. The driver sat in the hull. The armor is made from welded rolled and cast homogeneous steel of varying thickness. The US Army heavy armor battalion, in contrast to other armor units, was organized into four tank companies, composed of six platoons each, of which each platoon contained three M's, for a total of 18 tanks per company. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. Although the 21st century's M1 Abrams MBT utilizes the same caliber of main gun, the mm, the M's cannon was a rifled gun firing a fixed round, ejecting a lengthy brass shell casing The M1 tank's mm main gun is a smooth bore no rifling firing a semi-caseless round, ejecting only a back cap of the original loaded round; the bulk of the mm shell's casing is consumed during firing. Ammunition fired by the M's M58 cannon included:. Estes, K. Forty, G. Foss, C. Hunnicutt, R. Welcome to Wargaming. Tank Discussion. View Source View history. Jump to: navigation , search. These differences are taken into account in tooltip boxes. HP Hit Points Click here for more information. Expression error: Unrecognized word "unable". Additional Statistics Top Configuration. Camouflage Stationary: 4. Player Opinion. Pros and Cons Pros: Strong turret face armor and mantlet Good gun depression Well-rounded top gun with good performance across the board Huge tracks can help absorb shots when sidescraping Fast turret rotation for such a large turret Cons: Covered with weakspots, shockingly unreliable armor for a heavy tank Limited forward speed and horrible reverse speed Large target, the turret is especially huge Fragile ammo rack and engine modules Low ammo capacity Performance Coming from the T32 , the M could be quite the rude awakening for players used to typical American hull-down tactics. Early Research Players should first seek to upgrade to the mm, as the stock mm's low pen and accuracy is vastly inadequate when fighting other tier 9s and 10s. Members save with free shipping everyday! See details. Overview The T43 design represented the pinnacle of U. He is the editor of several books, and has written extensively in military and academic journals throughout his career. Kenneth was made an Honorary Legionnaire in the Spanish Legion in Related Searches. Allison-Engined P Mustang. North American Aviation's rapid and original design development of the P resulted in success versus Not enough credit is given to Allison-engined variants of one of the world's most famous fighters. We now View Product. Aston Martin. Aston Martin is a chronological account of the company's foundation in through to the Aston Martin is a chronological account of the company's foundation in through to the cenetenary celebrations -covering the the owners, financiers, and those that ran the company -and most importantly the cars. Richard Loveys details the extensive competition history including Curtiss P Long-nosed Tomahawks. In , with the threat of war in Europe growing by the day, the US In , with the threat of war in Europe growing by the day, the US Army Air Corps brass demanded a modern fighter that would combine the sterling handling qualities of the P with a boost in performance that would Hannie Richards. Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor house, and the other as an International smuggler. In this sharp and witty pastiche of the worlds of John Buchan and Rider Haggard, our heroine brings Jagdpanther vs SU Eastern Front The culmination of big-gun German and Soviet tank destroyer design can be found in their The culmination of big-gun German and Soviet tank destroyer design can be found in their clashes in Hungary in the spring of As World War II in Europe reached its end, armor development and doctrine had experienced several years Although tanks like the Sherman and Panther captured the headlines, the Allies' M10 tank destroyer While their mission was not principally fighting one M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tank Gunnery
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MHI Copy 3 FM 17-12 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL TANK GUNNERY HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NOVEMBER 1964 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com PREPARE TO FIRE Instructional Card (M41A3, M48, and M60 Tanks) TANK COMMANDER GUNNER DRIVER LOADER Commond: PREPARE TO Observe looder's actionr in Cleon periscopes, Check indicotor tape for FIRE. making check of replenisher in. lower seat, close proper amount of recoil oil Inspect coaxial machine- dicotor tope. Clean nd inspect hoatch, nd turn in replenilher. Check posi- gun ond telescope ports gunner s direct-fire sights. Check on master switch. tion of breechblock crank to ensure gun shield operaoion of sight covers if op. stop. Open breech (assisted cover is correctly posi- cable. Check instrument lights. by gunner); inspect cham- tioned ond clomps are Assist loader in opening breech. ber ond tube, and clote secure. Clean exterior breech. Check coxial lenses and vision devices. mochinegun and adjust and clean ond inspect head space if opplicble. commander's direct-fire Check coaxial machinegun sight(s). Inspect cupolao mount ond odjust solenoid. sowed ammunilion if Inspect turret-stowed am. applicable. munitlon. Command: CHECK FIR- Ploce main gun safety in FIRE Start auxiliary Place moin gun safety ING SWITCHES. position if located on right side engine (moin en- in FIREposition if loated If main gun has percus- of gun. Turn gun switch ON. gin. if tank has on left side of gun. If sion mechanism, cock gun Check firing triggers on power no auxiliary en- moin gun hoaspercussion for eoch firing check if control handle if applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub
    M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 PDF Book Army tank engineering of the late s. About This Item. Best for. The heavy tank proved fairly popular with its crews, who above all respected the powerful armament it carried. M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage. While the US Army deactivated its heavy armor units with the reception of the new M60 series main battle tanks in , the remaining Ms stayed within the US Marine Corps inventory until they began receiving the M60 series main battle tank. Post—World War II armies have shifted to the Main Battle Tank concept, in which a single model is expected to fulfill the breakthrough functions of a heavy tank while retaining the mobility of medium and light tanks. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. The M is a bit of a footnote in the history of US armour. Welcome to Wargaming. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. The last Ms were withdrawn from service in Walmart Services. Flag as inappropriate. See all related content. Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor Range A, Camp Pendleton, California. Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AIRCRAFT PROFILE] F8F Bearcat
    1 [REGISTER] [ACE OF THE MONTH] Lt.Gen. Vasily Fedorovich Golubev....................................... 3 [VEHICLE PROFILE] PzKpfw IV Ausf.C....................................................................... 6 Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. C with Prague writing on side, camouflage by JoKeR_BvB09 [AIR FORCES] Indonesian Air Force........................................................................ 10 Indonesian Air Force P-51, camouflage created by __StrafeMike__ [AIRCRAFT PROFILE] F8F Bearcat........................................................................... 13 F8F-1B from South Vietnam Air Forces, 1964; F8F-1 Bearcat of CV-37, USS Princeton. Camouflage created by ZeroZeroZeven [WEAPONS OF VICTORY] Dolgushin's La-7............................................................. 16 [HISTORICAL] The Heavy Tanks of the USA............................................................ 18 'M103 Old Wolf' camouflage by STALINGRAD34RUS [ACE TANKER] Johannes Kümmel.......................................................................... 22 Premium Pz.Kpfw. III Ausf. N in desert camouflage [VEHICLE PROFILE] M2A4 Light Tank..................................................................... 24 Premium M2A4 (1st Arm. Div.) [GROUND FORCES] 21. Panzerdivision (Africa Corps)............................................ 27 'Panzerkampfwagen II, German Africa Corps' camouflage by JoKeR_BvB09 [AIRCRAFT PROFILE] Mitsubishi J2M3 Raiden........................................................ 29 J2M3 Raiden, 352-37, 352 Flying Group, April 1945 camouflage
    [Show full text]
  • The Us Army and the Defense of West Germany
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CREATING DETERRENCE FOR LIMITED WAR: THE U.S. ARMY AND THE DEFENSE OF WEST GERMANY, 1953-1982 Ingo Wolfgang Trauschweizer, Ph.D., 2006 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jon T. Sumida, Department of History This dissertation addresses the role of the U.S. Army as an instrument of national and alliance strategy in the era of the Cold War. The army was confronted with the fundamental question of its utility in the nuclear age. This dissertation argues that after the Korean War army leaders pursued a consistent policy to create a force that could deter limited, i.e., conventional and tactical-nuclear war in Central Europe. This policy resulted in a three-decade long transition process, as the army had to respond to influences ranging from the Soviet threat to inter-service rivalry, budgetary concerns, rapidly evolving technology, and military and political developments in Europe and Asia. The transition process occurred in three stages. First, army leaders redefined the mission of their institution from war-fighting to the deterrence of war. Then, the structure of combat divisions was altered to reflect the requirements of nuclear as well as conventional battlefields. Finally, and only after the Vietnam War, doctrine was introduced that combined specific objectives in Central Europe, modern divisional structure, weapons technology, and newly defined principles of operational art in a coherent system of air and land warfare. At the heart of the dissertation rests the question of strategic decision-making and the impact of military institutions. But it also addresses NATO’s military and political capabilities and considers the effect of nuclear weapons on land warfare and the deterrence of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Armored Fighting Vehicals Preserved in the United States
    The USA Historical AFV Register Armored Fighting Vehicles Preserved in the United States of America V3.1 20 May 2011 Neil Baumgardner with help from Michel van Loon For the AFV Association 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 3 ALABAMA.......................................................................................................... 5 ALASKA............................................................................................................. 12 ARIZONA...........................................................................................................13 ARKANSAS........................................................................................................ 16 CALIFORNIA......................................................................................................19 Military Vehicle Technology Foundation................................................. 27 COLORADO........................................................................................................ 36 CONNECTICUT...................................................................................................39 DELAWARE........................................................................................................ 41 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA................................................................................... 42 FLORIDA..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Free Download
    M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 FREE DOWNLOAD Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom New Vanguard: M103 Heavy Tank 1950-74 (Paperback) Retrieved 25 August Inwith the threat of war in Europe growing by the day, the 1950-74 Army Air Corps brass demanded a modern fighter that would combine the sterling handling qualities of the P with a boost in performance that would Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests 1950-74 passions. Until the development of the M1 Abrams in the mids, it was the heaviest and most heavily armed tank in US service. Click here for more information. Login Create 1950-74. Overall, the M should be considered a "force multiplier", a tank that by itself is overall average, but that 1950-74 as support when part of a group. Following contemporary American design philosophy, the M was built with a two-piece, cast elliptic armor scheme, similar to the M48's design. Written by a librarything. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies M103 Heavy Tank battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. The T43 design represented the pinnacle of M103 Heavy Tank. Bundle Offer! Walmart Services. Kenneth Estes; Richard Chasemore. The T43 design represented the pinnacle of U. Read aloud. However, the development of extremely powerful 1950-74 compact engines improved the mobility of the later main battle tanks until it equaled that of the light tanks a decade earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery
    THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. About the Cover The cover shows the special logo developed for the Canadian Army Trophy, indicating the com- petition range and year. The six national flags represent the participating nations. The inner circle includes the insignia for HQ AFCENT flanked by CENTAG on the left and NORTHAG on the right, all superimposed over a maple leaf symbolizing the competition’s Canadian origins. (Ron Mihalko) THE CANADIAN ARMY TROPHY Achieving Excellence in Tank Gunnery Robert S. Cameron, Ph.D. U.S. Army Armor Branch Historian U.S. Army Armor School Fort Benning, Georgia 31905 iii iii iv iv Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward iii Introduction xi Chapter 1: The Early Years of the Canadian Army Trophy, 1963-1968 1 Evolving U.S. and NATO Policy 1 Competition Origins 3 CAT in the 1960s 5 Belgium’s American Cast-off 6 The German Armored Force Comes of Age 8 British Centurions 13 The Canadian Experience 15 The Netherlands 16 Whither the Americans? 17 Changing CAT 20 Chapter 2: Improving the Canadian Army Trophy, 1970-1979 25 NATO Developments 25 Updating CAT 28 Rule Britannia in 1970 29 The Doldrums of 1973 and 1975 33 Upping the Ante 37 O Canada in 1977 37 CAT 1979 44 The American Thunderbolt in Disarray 48 Reforging the Thunderbolt 53 Chapter 3: The Canadian Army Trophy in the Spotlight, 1981-1985 67 Cold War Background 67 Rules and Conditions 69 National Preparations 71 CAT 1981 75 Preparing for CAT 1983 79 CAT 1983 81 The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Very Simple Army Men (VSAM)
    Very Simple Army Men Saturday, July 16, 2011 Very Simple Army Men (VSAM) Operation Sandtrap is a registered trademarks of T. Sheil & A. Sheil © 1998. http://www.thortrains.net/armymen/wargame1.htm. Use of the trademark in this document is not intended to infringe upon or devalue the trademark. YOU MUST OWN Operation Sandtrap TO USE THESE VARIANTS! 1BC (One Brain-Cell) Toy Soldier Rules is a registered trademarks of Pete Kautz © 2001. http://www.alliancemartialarts.com/1BCToySoldiers.pdf. Use of the trademark in this document is not intended to infringe upon or devalue the trademark. YOU MUST OWN 1BC (One Brain-Cell) Toy Soldier Rules TO USE THESE VARIANTS! Fields of War is a registered trademarks of Alan Patrick © 2006. http://www.btinternet.com/~a.patrick/WW2Rules.htm. Use of the trademark in this document is not intended to infringe upon or devalue the trademark. YOU MUST OWN Fields of War TO USE THESE VARIANTS! World War II Rules is a registered trademarks of Ted Schulz © 2002. http://www.totalmodels.co.uk/workshop/pages/workshop_200.shtml. Use of the trademark in this document is not intended to infringe upon or devalue the trademark. YOU MUST OWN World War II Rules TO USE THESE VARIANTS! Fighting Plastic is a registered trademarks of T. Sheil & A. Sheil © 2005 written by Corey Butler. http://www.thortrains.net/armymen/newpic04/fpgame1.html. Use of the trademark in this document is not intended to infringe upon or devalue the trademark. YOU MUST OWN Fighting Plastic TO USE THESE VARIANTS! FUBAR is a registered trademark of Andrew Domino © 2011 Craig Cartmell.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Marine Corps' Tank Doctrine, 1920–50
    The U.S. Marine Corps’ Tank Doctrine, 1920–50 Lieutenant Colonel Kenneth W. Estes, Romain Cansière Marine Corps History, Volume 6, Number 2, Winter 2020, pp. 45-71 (Article) Published by Marine Corps University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/796390/summary [ Access provided at 2 Oct 2021 00:55 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The U.S. Marine Corps’ Tank Doctrine, 1920–50 by Lieutenant Colonel Kenneth W. Estes, USMC (Ret), with Romain Cansière Abstract: Major Joseph DiDomenico’s study of U.S. Army influence on U.S. Marine Corps tank doctrine ap- peared in the Summer 2018 issue of this journal, titled “The U.S. Army’s Influence on Marine Corps Tank Doctrine.” Mobilizing an impressive array of primary and secondary sources, DiDomenico laid considerable credit for the Corps’ improvements to its nascent World War II tank and amphibious tractor doctrine on the Army’s Armor School at Fort Knox as well as the improved Army doctrinal publications that had emerged by 1944. Major DiDomenico excoriated the Marine Corps’ neglect of “critical vulnerabilities for armor supporting amphibious operations.” The benchmark for Marine Corps tank doctrine’s failures to “synthesize” Army tank doctrine for Marine Corps missions is unsurprisingly the Battle of Tarawa. According to DiDomenico, the fail- ures registered at Tarawa “indicated an institutional ignorance in the operational art of combined arms.” This article presents some common misconceptions of Marine Corps tank policy and doctrine and aims to correct those misconceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMOR May-June 2002
    Transformation: Addressing Sustained Unit Readiness See Page 7 PB 17-02-3 May-June 2002 Time to Saddle Up… Editor’s Note: The author, Jon T. Clemens, re- tired in March after 18 years as managing editor of ARMOR. The job of managing editor of ARMOR Maga- zine looked like an interesting prospect in 1983, when I drove over to the little house on Vine Grove Road for my interview. At that point, I had worked for newspapers for 16 years, had been managing editor of a magazine, had edited hun- dreds of stories, had written a weekly syndi- cated column on popular music, had published an underground newspaper, and had coached writers. I figured that the ARMOR job would be subscribers than were going to the addresses more of the same, and in any case, I wasn’t on the official mailing list. A lot of people obvi- committed to doing it for the rest of my life. ously cared about this magazine I was inherit- My interview with Colonel Steiner went well. ing. But I really had no idea the extent of it. As When he asked for questions, I asked about the the weeks passed, I realized that I had stumbled magazine’s budget to pay writers for articles. He into what any editor would consider a dream job, said there wasn’t any. “They get a nice certifi- as the middleman in a love affair between writ- cate and a couple of free copies, but that’s it,” ers, readers, and an institution with a history.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Department
    Secretary of Defense I Elliot L. Richardson's ... DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FY 1974 For Official Use Only Until Released by The House Armed Services Committee STATEMENT OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ELLIOT L. RICHARDSON BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON THE FY 1974 DEFENSE BUDGET AND FY 1974-1978 PROGRAM TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1973 PREPARED: 3/29/73 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price: $2.10 domestic postpaid; $1.75 GPO Bookstore Stock Number 0800-00187 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. THE SECRETARY'S SUMMARY .•.•••....................•... 1 U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES ...•... 20 A. The New Foreign Policy in Practice •......•.. 21 B. The Threat ...................•....••.•...... 31 THE FY 1974 DEFENSE BUDGET ................•.......... 41 A. The Relative Defense Burden ..•............•. 41 B. The FY 1974 Defense Budget in Real Terms .... 43 C. Defense Budget Trends ......••............... 47 THE FY 1974 PROGRAM AND FORCES 53 A. Strategic Forces .••......................•.. 53 B. General Purpose and Mobility Forces . 66 MANPOWER 93 A. Major Manpower Objectives .....•..........•.. 93 B. Manpower Requirements .•...............•..... 94 C. Manpower Costs . 97 D. Manning the Active Forces under Zero Draft .. 98 E. Manning Reserve Forces under Zero Draft ..... 106 F. Improving the Attractiveness of Military Life . 108 G. Special Problems: Equal Opportunity and Drug Abuse .................•.............. 110 H. Manpower Stabilization .....•..••..•......... 115 TABLE
    [Show full text]